- FL
- Brevard County
- 5/5/25
- 05/05/2025
- 42 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Brevard County Value Adjustment Board meeting, a central issue emerged concerning the Burkovich case, which involved a dispute over property valuation. The board overturned the property appraiser’s assessment, opting to use a “cost of cure” approach, which valued the property at approximately $1.388 million. This decision was based on evidence presented by the taxpayer’s representative, Alex Burkovich, who argued that the original assessment failed to adhere to proper appraisal standards.
- FL
- Brevard County
- 4/25/25
- 04/25/2025
- 92 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Brevard County Value Adjustment Board meeting spotlighted concerns regarding property appraisal discrepancies and the board’s procedural role in addressing them. A homeowner’s appeal over a property value affected by FEMA’s floodplain remapping and discrepancies in the appraisal process dominated discussions, revealing complexities in the board’s decision-making authority and the need for procedural clarity.
- FL
- Brevard County
- 8/2/24
- 08/02/2024
- 35 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the latest Brevard County Value Adjustment Board (VAB) meeting, the board approved the inclusion of a late applicant for the special magistrate position after a discussion among members. The meeting also covered routine approvals and scheduling for the upcoming year.
- FL
- Brevard County
- 3/19/24
- 03/19/2024
- 20 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Brevard County Value Adjustment Board (VAB) meeting. Former Commissioner Chuck Nelson, representing the appellants as a friend and neighbor, presented the case of two residents who, after buying out a third party’s interest in their shared property, lost their homestead exemption. This loss resulted in their property’s assessed value nearly doubling from $300,000 to almost $600,000. The appellants sought to have their exemption reinstated at the previous level, arguing that no changes in the home’s occupancy or ownership beyond the buyout had occurred.