- NJ
- Cape May County
- 11/25/24
- 11/25/2024
- 186 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a meeting of the Cape May Historic Preservation Commission, A discussion unfolded regarding a proposed swimming pool installation at a property on Hugh Street within the historic district. Concerns about visibility, noise, and adherence to historic standards were central to the debate, which also raised questions about the commission’s authority to revisit previously approved applications.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 10/21/24
- 10/21/2024
- 235 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a Cape May Historic Preservation Commission meeting, significant time was dedicated to addressing discrepancies in fence materials for a previously approved project, alongside discussions on historic integrity and proposed changes to various properties. A debate arose over the compliance of a metal fence installation instead of the approved wooden design.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 9/16/24
- 09/16/2024
- 144 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In its recent meeting, the Cape May Historic Preservation Commission approved a new fence enclosure for HVAC units at City Hall and engaged in discussions about various property redesigns, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the historic integrity of the neighborhood.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 8/12/24
- 08/12/2024
- 168 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cape May Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) held a meeting on August 12, 2024, where they discussed and approved several property renovations, debated the authenticity of proposed changes, and addressed new flood regulations potentially impacting historic properties.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 7/15/24
- 07/15/2024
- 180 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cape May Historic Preservation Commission held a meeting where topics included the approval of new construction proposals, discussions on the use of appropriate materials for renovations and new builds, and debates on the visual impact of various structural elements within the historic district. The commission addressed several substantial matters, such as the controversial use of synthetic turf at a prominent hotel, the choice of cedar shingles for a historic home, and the design of a new family home on Grant Street. Additionally, there was an ongoing conversation about the need to amend the roof pitch regulations and the utility of requiring 3D renderings for better visualization of proposed projects.