- Filters
- MN
- Crow Wing County
- 12/23/25
- 12/23/2025
- 39 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners discussed a range of issues during their recent meeting, with a focus on the development of solar farms and the revision of shoreline ordinances. The board considered new buffer requirements for lakes, examined current and potential regulations for solar energy projects, and debated the implications of these developments on the county’s landscape and environmental policies.
- MN
- Crow Wing County
- 12/18/25
- 12/18/2025
- 169 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners convened to address a series of land use and zoning applications, most notably a proposal to rezone a residential area for commercial use, discussions about shoreline vegetation buffers, and the affirmation of a staff decision denying a building permit based on historical restrictions.
- MN
- Crow Wing County
- 12/16/25
- 12/16/2025
- 137 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners meeting on December 16, 2025, addressed issues, including potential increases in landfill fees, community concerns regarding local developments, and budgetary allocations for 2026.
- MN
- Crow Wing County
- 11/25/25
- 11/25/2025
- 118 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners convened to address pressing community issues, particularly the proposal for a Lake Improvement District (LID) for Upper and Lower Mission Lakes and a debated land exchange with Bradley and Jane Holvig.
- MN
- Crow Wing County
- 11/20/25
- 11/20/2025
- 70 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners meeting was notably marked by extensive public concern over the proposed Trailside Preserve development, which aims to create 21 residential lots near Gilbert Lake. Residents raised issues regarding traffic congestion, environmental impact, and community character, urging the board to reconsider the development’s density and its potential implications.