##VIDEO ID:Mbiucr6S_DE## e e e e testing it's working Janie should I leave it on and turn it off e e he hey m took yeah I know I always forget sor [Music] beautiful beautiful e yeah saw [Music] that's be a short ready to go that's good Janie Anderson Dell blinton present Roda bantos Judy hammerberg Michael L here vill staff Daren C Grant Luciano nibs present Rafael gutterz pres Vanessa Cherry present and good evening once again everyone this is a meeting of the village of biscan Park Code Compliance board the board is authorized pursuant to chapter 14 of The Village's Land Development code to ensure compliance with The Village's code of ordinances the members of the board are citizens and residents of the village of dise Park and we volunteer our time and are not paid for our services the purpose of each hearing is to give any alleged violators the opportunity to contest the decision of the code compliance officer which resulted in the issuance of of a notice of violation and to determine whether a violation of The Village's code has occurred or is occurring we are not authorized to dismiss violations based on hardships ignorance or the fact that others may be guilty of the same violation these hearings are conducted in a quasi judicial manner our responsibility is to act much like a judge in a court and that is to hear cases presented by The villous Code Compliance officers and to hear contradictory arguments presented by the alleged violators we are not authorized to change the code The Village commission is solely authorized to enact or revise codes conversely neither the commission nor the village manager have the authority to overrule the findings of the board pursuant to chapter 162 of the Florida Statutes orders of the board can only be appealed through the Circuit Court of Miami Dade County we have the authority to assess and order the payment of civil penalties to issue orders having the force of law to command whatever steps are necessary to bring a violation into compliance and to assess administrative costs in order to make a finding upholding The Code Compliance officer's decision we must find that there is substantial competent evidence that the named violator was responsible for a violation of the relevant section of the code as charged all documentary evidence presented by the parties must be submitted for placement in the hearing file no documentary evidence will be considered unless the alleged violator or code compliance officer submits a copy for the hearing file each party shall have the right to call and examine witnesses to introduce exhibits to cross-examine opposing Witnesses on any matter relevant to the issues even though the matter was not covered in the direct examination to impeach any Witnesses regardless of which party first called them to testify and to rebut the evidence against them if you intend to address the board and have not signed in please do so and anyone wishing to address the board please stand raise your right hand so that you may be sworn in you are reminded that this board is a quasi judicial board and giving false testimony can be penalized please stand up raise your right hand do you swear or affirm that the testimony you about to give will be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth maybe SE it do we have any additions deletions or changes I'd like to see the minutes to the end of the meeting right Bessa if you could remember always put the minutes as our last item before discussion that way folks don't have to sit and listen through and I would like to just add two very short discussion items procedure for expired permits and the need for an alternate for this board I promise I'll make it short any other changes additions or deletions none we're ready for our first case good evening Mar Grant Code Compliance Department in Old business which is section s of the agenda 7.1 for the address located at 720 Northeast 117th Street for case number c-24 d381 for Icon Capital LLC in care of their registered agent Jeffrey ion this Cas is being brought before the board for an intent to lean they were viated uh under Section 8.4.3 point1 property maintenance for paint and maintenance of the exterior wall they have complied on the violation and I would like to enter onto the record permit number ep2 24-23 they however remain non-compliant with the fine of $500 I'm looking at the two pictures side by side the one titled violation and the one titled compliance it looks like the same staining still exists yet that's correct I believe the order was for them to get a permit by certain date okay they have actually pulled the permit correct they're not complied as any done into the house yet they are working on a lot of other that's correct I was a little confused same question that's a little confused okay questions from the board if there are no questions I'd like to make a motion please like to make a motion to affirm and move to file a lean against the property for $500 plus applicable filing fees a second yeah we have a motion and a second we file the intent to lean for the outstanding fine and any applicable filing fees and all in fav favor I I I any opposed motion passes 5 next item is 7.2 for the same address and same Property Owners case number Cen 24- 383 Cas Brad for intent toine for a fence maintenance violation of section 11.6.3 A B C and D they are now in compliance with the fence it was repaired however they haven't paid the final $500 I sort of got the same question as in case number one um our picture showing compliance is of an open gate how are we to know that in fact it is now Plum and it fits okay you know properly if there's a pool back there when it's an gate um I looked at it a little differently and that the first one the hinges are missing the brackets are missing the second one the Hing is there and it's to me that's complied it just happens to be okay good catch thank you I was expecting a picture of a Clos Gap but thank you but anyone any questions from the board no and N for me if there are no questions I'd like to make a motion like to make a motion in case number c-24 d383 uh to affirm uh and request the village move forward to file a lean against the property for $500 plus any applicable filing fees second I have a motion in a second all in favor I I opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 7.3 for the same address and same Property Owners this is for case number c-24 d596 and intent toan they were found to be in violation of section 8.4.3 point1 B C and H for property maintenance the driveway and walk walkway paved surface has been showing signs of discolorations and cracks um through the entire surface area they applied for a permit and i' would like to enter onto the record DW s-24 -57 however this permit was rejected by planning and design review board on October 22nd 20124 they still owe $500 in fines we know why the uh permit was rejected um I read the notes and they just say rejected there was no explanation they've already been issued puts us in a tough position they've already been issued the Affidavit of compliance the Affidavit of compliance was I mean the the the order of the board was for them to pull a permit for the driveway so the driveway has been pulled is that yes it's in process it's fine okay has there been any communication from the property owner yes you will see in the next case which is um C 24- um 652 that we've had uh numerous email exchanges with the property owner in terms of settling this situation yes they will be going back to Planning and Zoning after they make the corrections that they need to make any other questions motion yes I'd like to make a motion in case number c-24 d596 uh motion to affirm the uh and move that the village file a lean against the property for $500 and applicable filing fees second okay we have a motion second all in favor I opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 7.4 same address and same Property Owners the case number is c-24 d652 this is an intent toine we will found them in violation of section 11.9.19 35 swimming pools the gate um the swimming pool was insecure because of the same gate that we saw in the previous case it's now in compliance that they still allow $500 in um administrative um fees and a violation fine of 250 was all was all this stuff done with these violations they were all done at at the same time or different times they were done at different times okay so that's why you're saying that you are asking for an administrative fee on the same property for like the second or third time administrative fee was already assessed the violation fine was already assessed so they owe $500 on this case for the administrative fee or for the fine the administrative fee was 250 the fine was $ 250 250250 for both okay and this is the one that you had all the communication with the the homeowner with the text messages and the emails yes yes and do you know why they're not here tonight I did you communicate about that then I was hoping they would be here they're not here tonight they didn't say why they're not here in the meeting tonight I was hoping again that they would be here because we've had extensive communication with them they didn't want us to do a reinspection okay F in the um admin find were suspect in September right I mean are they renovating the house is that I mean what what's going on with the whole situation as you understand it they are renovating the house and they've gone ahead and applied for some permits however I was very concerned about the swimming pool because it was in very bad shape and I was hoping they would allow us onto the property to reinspect the swimming pool but the owner was adamant that he's not going to let us on to the property and why was that I have no idea well he's saying that he's not going allow you to reinspect the the pool correct and I did explain to him in detail that if we do not reinspect for compliance we cannot comply case you know what I realized when I looked at the Dropbox file today all of this additional paperwork that I have um copies is not on the Dropbox file well may I don't know I don't think I have that I mean I've got all the communications the the next the next next one I believe coming up is is what you're is what you're addressing it has to do with the pool itself okay this one has to do with the fact of the pool was not secured um because the because of the Gate of the gate right but that I mean so that's what I was actually thinking of because you got one for the gate and then you got one for the pool so have two for the swimming pool one for mosquitoes and the other one was for the pool not being drained okay well I see the pictures they're not pleasant as far as the violation goes technically in compliance right yes but but if it's technically in compliance and they don't allow for that's the next one that's that's coming up this is bound by the fence once the fence was repaired this problem is solved except the finest to and we were able to reinspect the gate because it's in plain view the swimming pool is not it's in the back of the property okay um any I was going to say if there no further questions I'd like to make gates open then it's not securing the property the picture of the gate shows the gate open you have another picture he has another picture of the gate closed I think on the day when they went uh to take the picture the gate was open there might have been some people on the property cleaning out the I I'll I'll take that that's fine and and just so I'm clear the the pool thing is because of the the previous F was because of the the the the uh the draining and also the bugs and then they wouldn't give you an opportunity to you know to clear that which is okay that's where it stays okay right with the two violations that I'm about to read now they did not allow us to go on the property and do a compliance inspect got because it was the gate we could see outside so if there no further questions in everybody's I'd like to make a motion on case number c-2 4- 652 like make a motion to affirm the violation and to move the village to follow lean against the property for $500 plus applicable filing fees second we have a first and a second all in favor I I motion passes 5 Z Judy second yeah next item is 7. five for the same address and same Property Owners this is an intent toine they were found to be in violation of section 11.9.18 A Day total fins do $9,250 just seems counterproductive but that's his he doesn't want can't bring the case to conclusion the fines will continue to grow so just so I can understand this because it seems like there was a lot of communication there's text messages emails there's there's a lot of back and forth did um uh did did the point in time was there a point in time at the which was the same time that you know don't come on my property and the communication stopped is that is that what happened there was some bright line because he's not here we don't know why he's not here because you haven't been able to communicate with him but you also have a lot of evidence that you did so when did that happen um we have different dates actually the text messages came earlier right after we issued the first violations um we got in contact with his assistant in the office but at some point if you read the messages he said the assistant does not speak on my behalf I I have to be the one that gives permission she did give us permission to go and do the initial inspections but he was very angry about that he wasn't he according to him he did not give her permission for us not permission to speak on his behalf so there was that confusion towards the end the assistant was in communication with us again she sent us several emails that she said she had been sending to us I hadn't seen those emails but she had some pictures that she says confirmed compliance I did explain to her that I canot use her pictures or anyone else's pictures I had to get on the property to get compliances it's the same principle you can't write a violation on somebody else's pictures you can't cure a violation on one either it's not legal no and this person I mean because I'm trying to Vision like who this person is cuz obviously they're not here and they had notice of being here right you know there might have been some older person that you know just was very private this sounds like a guy with an assistance is somewhat sophisticated this is a business right Vanessa was just telling me some of the mail we've we've been sending um to the legal address that's in the uh County uh records has been coming back and claimed however he is aware of the violations because as you can see he's been in constant communication with us since this is a safety issue does the village have any legal recourse because let's face it if this hasn't been tended to it's got any number of potential safety ramifications when we were on the commission we passed a ordinance about putting um uh plywood over unsafe pools but at the same time add um Deion our our lawyer was very specific to tell us that it's a slippery slippery walk on to cross onto somebody else's property so basically it was done more as a um we're trying to make a statement here plus they got I mean the fence is there I mean the fence he's got his property secured right the property is secure um initially it wasn't as you can see the gate was broken and we saw the swimming pool from the neighbors property we didn't see it from the front mhm so the neighbors are the ones who actually mentioned that there was a swimming pool there with if you look at the initial pictures for the swimming pool you see that we couldn't even see the swimming pool at first we we couldn't have known there's a swimming pool if no one told us Michael I'm thinking more than just a child falling in or something I'm thinking an animal greeting ground for all sorts of verman and neighbors have yes yeah the property has been so poorly maintained it's vacant we understand that however the the maintenance has been so poor that they could have an accident could have happened there it was an accident waiting to happen and this is uh I mean the the owner is icon Capital LLC doing business as Jeffrey Khan that's correct okay so it's a bus I mean this is a business it is a business okay all right all right there there are no more questions or comments I'll make a motion I'll make a motion that in Cen 24- 653 um we uh lean the property for the amount that is owed as of this date with whatever uh filing fees are also owed I'll second and that amount is $9,250 as which will change of course by the time they fil up today I have a first and a second all in favor I I motion passes 5 Z next item is 7.6 same address and same property owner this is for case number cn- 24654 we're bringing this case for inent toan with they were found to be in violation of section 8.4.2 E Law maintenance and cleanup this um swimming pool was providing a breeding ground for mosquitoes so I was talking about the in the last case about them together this is just the second of that right you had the one where the pool was filled it need to be drained and this one is now the mosquito one okay just want to understand that we're talking about different things but one big thing any more questions or comments can I have a motion I'd like to make a motion in case number B-24 d64 motion to affirm the violation and move the village to lean against the property for $9,250 as of November the 6th 2024 plus applicable filing fees I'll second all in favor I any opposed motion passes 5 next item 7.7 this is for the address located at 820 Northeast 111 Street case number c-23 d315 Rey's Investments 820 LLC in care of his registered agent Raul Reyes we were bringing this case for intent to lean however the property owner has paid uh the fine for the violation and it's now in compliance any questions not a motion on Cas number c-23 um as the president has complied and paid the applicable pleas I move to close the case I'll second all in favor I motion pass is 5 Z next item is 7.8 address 11335 north is 11th Place this is for case number cn2 24276 eido Gonzalez we are bringing this case for an intent toine on of the violation of chapter 5.6 of street parking the driveway did not meet design standards however the driveway was replenished today it's now in compliance fines have run in the amount of $20,000 since Mr Gonzalez is in in compliance we are recommending that we provide him with an application for a fine reduction so he can get the fine reduced is here today Mr Gonzalez he needs to he needs to be sworn in V they came in late please raise your hand do you swear or affirm that the testimony you about to give would be the truth the whole truth or nothing but the truth okay good go um folks first and foremost I apologize for my my tardiness traffic um so if you would identify yourself and your relationship to the property oh I'm sorry I'm ago Gonzalez and I'm the owner and uh evening uh I I guess Daren was very helpful yesterday when when we spoke as I shared with GRE I had received uh a letter uh from from this uh The Village um for a meeting uh on July 17th and um fortunately I cannot attend in person like I can today due to my wife's he problems and um therefore I I spoke with Vanessa and she provided a zoom meeting number and uh which I dialed in and I kept receiving these messages and uh where basically it's telling this is probably word Mission proclamations please wait and wait and wait and I did U from 609 all the way to 6:31 I just took uh um screenshot thank you for during that sure no I would have preferred to have been in person but but could um did we know that that do we had problems communicating no but I mean like is are people people having that problem right now um I don't believe did we provide a zoom number to we didn't provide a zoom we only provide the zoom number if someone tells us in advance that they would like to come on Zoom okay I personally I appreciated that that option fact that I couldn't be here in person but like I said I attempted to to do so to identify or understand what the issue was um finally uh yesterday D Daren explained what the issue was quite frankly I I think that this whole thing was um a mistake um we have um gravel uh on our driveway and it's white and I've since Googling and whatnot learned that um uh gray Granite chips of gr granates are more durable more lasting better for the environment so on so for lay it down on looks good and and you don't need to worry about it anymore and we did that we started doing that shortly before we were fine and I think the gray Granite stood out from the white and it appeared like well this is you know partially done and that kind of deal and I think that's that's what happened and that was uh resolved today thanks to dorine sharing my question would be seeing how this appears to be more than 50% deteriorated at the beginning wouldn't it have to come into uh uh driveway standard code because uh this is not properly um uh bound the boundaries are not according to code right and there's there's to be a border at the front where it meets the uh Street as well as the border around the perimeter um so while there may be gravel replacement I don't see where it's come to compliance as far as being a proper driveway so and if I may uh we we are bounded on on on three sides uh partially well the I'm sorry the par just to answer the question it looks like railroad I mean the little ties that you find in a parking lot that are placed and I don't think that that is according to our um code I don't know I'm leaving that up to code officers I'm only pointing out that right now according to what I'm seeing I don't see where it is meeing in compliance well I mean you said if it was needed 50% or more but correct what what he was saying was that he had enough of the rocks in there before he was just gradually making a change and it made an appear as though it was not that it was and that's what I took into consideration when I looked at his case he had white gravel in the beginning and then they threw the granite over the gravel am I saying that right yeah so it looked a little halfhazard it wasn't that the driveway was completely it was under 50% when I looked at it and that's why I was um so you don't believe it was more than 50% at the time it was more of a optical illusion it was an visual you know uh I I don't want to call it an illusion Mirage however darker darker Granite versus contrast and give the appearance as though something is missing at the picture of July 10th I'm looking at Major gaps of gravel not contrasting gravel but gaps of of gravel and anything more than 50% no I think I think they're not they're little rocks what what I'm looking at is the order of of enforcement and it says um that a violation occurred there shall be full compliance with the stated provisions of code of ordinances by pulling the necessary permits to install the driveway it didn't say replace it said to install a driveway that's that's the order of enforcement that's correct however I did review the case like as I I stated after I spoke with Mr Gonzalez I reviewed the case and reviewed the pictures and it was my conclusion that there was miscommunication especially on the illusion of the the white stone and the Greystone and and and what you were saying when you when you wrote you wrote that right no I didn't um one of my offices issued okay the violation okay but was it predicated upon the the uh the notion that it was less than 50% be when he looked at the um when he issued the viation that was the the idea it was predicated on something that we've just that you took into consider I had to go and that I had to verify so I went back and looked at the the case again more than 50% requires an actual border and the border that concrete has to be below gr that's that's right but what he but what she is saying and what he is testified to under oath is that it was more than 50 it w it was fine in terms of the amount of rocks that were there he's just changing the rocks created an illusion that looked like more than 50% which you still believe it is from looking at the photograph not looking from the iPad where you can go in in great detail and see that those are little rocks there they are not uh that current picture as of today I'm this is the old one this this is the old one July yeah this is the one from July if you look at those are little rocks in there they're not surrounded by dark rocks that PE gravel compresses when you drive on it and turns into sand but it's not have to reexamine it myself I'll go I'll let me just restate my position at this point I'll I'll leave it up to the code officer um Code Department to bring it back before us if there's a a request for a reduction currently I don't see where the Border meets the standard I would be hardpressed to see with little round board um things down here and then on the other side it's um got tubular tubular concrete things it's not even they're not even what's the word and set in the ground the two sides there's no uniformity to the border of this property that's a problem well that's a problem now that that when you're looking at problem whenever it was there the predicate of all of that was the was the appearance that there was less than 50% of the driveway that was there which we was not we're focus on the Rocks you have to focus on the the entire driveway and when you look at the Podge Podge border some of which is broken up that to me is also part of the driveway and that contributes to the more than 50% deteri well maybe maybe that's a violation that that comes next but I think that the predicate of why we're here today wasn't anything to do with those borders it it all was predicated upon the amount or the appearance of the amount or lack of rocks that were there because he's changing the color so that's not for that what you're talking about is in my humble opinion is not for today right I Mike I'm sorry Janie Mike I agree with you in part I'm only going by the order of enforcement which was to pull a permit and bring the driveway into compliance so right now we're not at any of it there's been cooperation I'll leave it up I'd rather leave it up to the board I mean to uh code Conant officers bring back a proper uh hearing cor fine reduction whatever but I would be hard pressed and as a neighbor if I were a neighbor of here and having to think that came into compliance I do respect anybody else to drive way as such as that for um the residents and the property owners who but this property or any tenants that AB but the property you know it's it's we shouldn't have to settle wellon if I may if if I may interrupt in keeping with uh Mr lat's uh point I did myself a disservice by upgrading from gravel to Granite it's simply what happened here that's a no good de go UNP punished basically sir I'm I'm not even stressing just the gravel I'm looking at borders that border as part of your driveway and when I see the condition of that border to me that's that together is more than 50% that's where I'm having a problem our standards require concrete that's sunk in I believe 4 Ines to enclose the gravel on all four sides so that the gravel doesn't go free onto the street we respect observations of the board and we will work with Mr Gonzalez to make sure that border is done we will bring him back in December for a fine reduction but we will ask that he brings pictures of the Border done correctly yeah I guess and and end of I may and I apologize for taking up any more of your time and keeping with Mr L well we appreciate that thank you ER the Catalyst for this uh violation if you would was in fact and not an optical illusion but simply a visual issue and I did myself a disservice by wanting to upgrade from gravel to to Grant it and and I respectfully request that that be taken into consideration um as we we'll provide you with information on how you can bring that border into compliance Mr Gonzalez and I'll be happy to give you this form to fill out it's $50 to apply for reduction very good thank you sir our meeting sir our meeting in December is December 18th would you be able to make that meeting I think we'd really appreciate if you be there don't know yeah the the problem is is people can watch it on Zoom but you can't really participate on Zoom because we don't have an interaction with the zoom so the zoom is for watching it later it's really not a way we have nobody to monitor Zoom to take care of interative Vanessa very kindly provided the number I the meeting I right you can watch the meeting participate there's no further questions and I would like to make a motion in cn24 d276 that we table this till the December meeting give the property owner a chance to come back and apply for a fine reduction a second all in favor I I motion passes 5 Z you can read it is the fine reduction you guys don't think that it's who seconded the motion Michael thank you I just wanted to mention to the board that a representative for cases already heard for property 720 Northeast 117th Street is here however we will have to speak with them at the end of the meeting if the board so desires next item 7.9 11141 Northeast 8th Court is for case number Cen 24122 property appraiser information protected this um case appeared before the board for violations and we are here asking for an intentan found to be in violation of section 8.4.4 D they still have the storm shs on the on the property they on over the windows they haven't removed them has there been any communication with the homeowner we were in communication we spoke to him on the phone I believe before the first hearing he was very upset that we are issuing him with violations um he did think we are being fair and he hasn't been in communication after that just what he thought and then he do you it if you remember at the last hearing the neighbors Yeah couple that was here right so he just B the communication was to tell you what he thought about everything and then that was it that's correct okay and how long ago was that I think it's about a month and a half ago we spoke with him no two months because we didn't have a hearing they are from yeah from September this is plywood correct it's not shutter um is plywood yes that's correct that is um iWood boarded up Windows questions anyone like to make a motion sure case number I'd like to make a motion in case number c-24 d122 make a motion to affirm the violation and move uh the billage to follow lean against the property for $9,250 as of 116 and applicable filing fees second I have a motion in a second all in favor I I any opposed motion pass is 5 Z it's Dale Judy Dale and Judy thank you next case 7.10 for the same address and same property owner in tent toan in violation of section 8.47 they have EX excessive unattended growth of weeds Brash branches and overgrowth in the ray of the property outstanding fine is $9,250 any questions yeah nothing's changed since nothing has changed um if there's no questions I'd like to make a motion Cas number c-24 d156 before you do the people live there as far as you know right it's not vacant it's not vacant the gentleman lives there okay that a motion to affirm violation occurred to affirm the violation and move that the village uh lean against the property for $9,250 as of November the 6 2024 and any applicable violence second we have a motion in a second all in favor I iOS motion passes 5 Z moving to new business which is section8 of the agenda 8.1 is for the address 620 Northeast 116th Street this is for case number Cen 24659 Alexander J Rubin and Ariel Gilder they were requesting an administrative hearing for a citation $25 olded they have paid the violation and it's now in compliance make a motion in CN 24-65 659 a violation didar the property owner is come into compliance let's close the case second all in favor I motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.2 for 640 Northeast 115th Street this is for case number c-24 625 Ricardo Jose Lucina and Johanna Lucina we ask asking for an order of enforcement they have been found to be in violation of section 16.3 point1 building permits required for the construction of a structure in the rear of the property without first obtaining permits they have since obtained a permit and I would like to enter onto the record permit number 15305 44 when was that obtained still in process two hours ago three hours ago still in process since uh sorry it applied this afternoon my name is uh your name and your relationship to the property okay my name is Juan Rodriguez and I represent him to uh Aron engineering which going to be handling the their jobs so we already got the drawing some mles and uh we got a power of attorney be from now on I going to be in touch with Raphael and anybody in charge the core compliance this is a part of attorney that's from the owners to me so I can address and uh we already got the processings I was trying to upload the the files but uh the system was changed so it was rejecting me not password accessible and accessible and think finally um I believe it was a day before yesterday it went through with C with the new one so it's already in the system so there's no actual it hasn't gone in front of pnz or anything else for this not yet no not yet they they applied this afternoon yes correct and and they are right the the system has been transferring from our old system to a new to new system according to the notice of violation they were given a compliance date of September 9th so we're two months past that's correct this was cited August well I mean the homeowners are here right so maybe we can hear from them and find out what the delay was it maybe it was excusable delay I I I was hired by them by the time but the thing is that um I'm partially partially being working on it because I am a cancer survivor and I've been in treatment so I couldn't put myself a fulltime in there so I be by the time I was hired so I was uh at the uh um in treatment and I still carry a pump that it was installed call on me because of the chemotherapy for for my liver so but they did the right thing I am the one in I app to we represent we're doing the drawing and we're trying to get it all together for them so we can get the permit well first of all I hope you're doing well thank you sir okay and second of all when you guys were in contact uh what yall why don't you guys come up here and let me ask you guys so you got to introduce yourselves please and your relationship to the property Ricardo and joen the owners of the property and and you guys were in contact with the contractor correct correct so I mean um when we started talking probably uh late August um in the beginning we were trying to figure out first of all what this whole thing entailed and we were uh extremely ignorant of of the process of what had to be done and which iiz and I know that you mention all were at one point believe me you are not alone again but we're not making any excuse to it uh that's why we uh hired Mr Juan because we were lost in uh uh in what the process was he's been kind enough to uh help us uh done all the drawings um translating the Chinese of that to me uh but again uh we're extremely apologetic and we're making no excuse for being late I know we've tried to communicate with the city a couple times and we're working in it uh trying to buy us some time to get everything in order I know Mr Gutierrez has been in the house a couple times he's been trying to guide us and help us and we appreciate that uh but the bottom line is that you were in touch with Mr Juan in correct in late August after you got the correct correct and we I mean if you want we have communications with them that we can show you no but I'm just trying to understand the timeline the timeline because there's been a discussion here about the delay because of certain compliance dates that were not met now you know you talked about being in communication one of the things you may wanted to have said was that Mr Juan was in cancer treatment at and therefore unavailable to give 100% of his time because he's trying to survive at and then now he's in a good shape where he can now devote your property and that's why you're here on you know November November 6 instead of in reality my biggest issue is when construction on the outside is started without a permit there has again a potential safety issue you you can't do construction without a permit at all probably that was the whole thing for me was yeah regardless of a contractor or not construction was begun without a permit in August that's how we the notice of violation came about and for up to September to uh take some action to obtain a permit right no um actually they applied for it they have to go in front of p and Z before it gets granted or denied right theyve applied for it in the meantime there is this outside structure constructed minus any permitting or inspections right well I Mr Juan have you have you looked at the property do it looked like it's an imminent danger of falling on a child or somebody out there not unfe it's just that they all they did is they put couple of walls of block but they got a they got a re reinforcing on it so I'm going to try to do is as soon as we get something that that we get the approval from the city start getting you know but the villages inspectors have not been there right so we're we're not we're not sure if this whatever is already up there is going to be allowed to stand we don't know if it meets our codes we don't know if it meets the setbacks we don't know anything on it as of Mr are you a general contractor DC professional okay so so the the outfit that you work with is are General Contractors okay did any of those guys look at the property are you are you an engineer or a contractor but but what what is your background are you an engineer are you a general contractor okay but you're not a general contractor or an engineer okay so has anybody looked at that wall that was an engineer or a general contractor contractor that signed the without the city's involvement we have no idea no he said no if this will be alled to remain standing it could be in a setback there's any number of things we don't know but he being presented in uh in the drawings with the setbacks and everything it's being presented you don't know to this point right we what my issue as I see it is is how it's cited construct um construction of a structure of the real property without a permit so to me we're here because a permit hasn't been wasn't wasn't issued prior to construct starting construction so one is is since then so I assume they paid a double permit fee that's correct and they will move forward with the next action so it's somewhat in compliance now to a to a degree a small degree but the issue is did or did not they start construction without a permit me yes I'm going moving forward I'm looking at it the violation did occur I told them that because they shouldn't but they didn't know they were not aware if if there are no more questions any anything more you fed like that um I just want to reassure that we're gonna try well we're going to do everything possible to be um case number CN d 24- 625 like to make a motion that a uh violation has occurred assess a fine of $250 administrative costs of $250 and to come into compliance by December the 20th which which allows for two pnz planning and develop and design meetings if not a 250 December What 20th and we have it on the 18th so we can bring it back to the board the meeting is on the 18th November December December oh all right de by December the 18th I thought I was looking at the planning and design and the case that yes or 250 you know they got comments or revision or something that have to be done you can ask for an EXT okay on the 18 that gives you two two um planning and one that gives you actually three is it three no it gives them two the 25th and the 9th 25th and the 9th it gives you two planning and design meetings to attend get it approved the second and the 16th excuse me I was looking at the it gives you two to um to go to to obtain it if if you haven't gotten it by then and it's still in the works you ask for an extension when you you come back to us on I mean for the 18th we'll have a hearing on the 18th hopefully by this I'll second that motion you're saying they did y That's a fine then you want to come in the compliance by 122 12 18 1218 that means having a finalized permit both with you know going to B and D planning and uh design and having it approved if they haven't they can come back to us on the 18th two days later and say you know we're working with them here's where we are I'd like an extension okay and that and that wall that you built how tall is that wall right now it's like at 6 68 68 okay so we have a motion in a second all in favor I'm sorry no I was just going to restate so it's 250 fine 250 administrative fee uh come into compliance by December the 18th or $250 per day fine thereafter now second all in favor I I oppos motion passes 5 Z you guys look at that thanks for help right thank you gonna do something send ra it should be okay yeah thank you right okay second J the next items are 8.3 8.4 and 8.5 there's a special report on this particular property um in the recent past our Police Department was called to this house they found ERS living on the property there was criminal activity they found firearms and narcotics on um inside the house three gentlemen were arrested the house has now been boarded up for protection to secure it and we are asking the board for a continuance on this case the property owner has an open permit for new construction meaning they would like to demo this house um although we don't have an demo permit in the system we do have an open permit for new construction now with the situation that occurred we are asking for some time for the property owner to be able to sort out the legal issues with the house now go ahead and apply for a demo permit is is this the house that somebody had passed away and then it changed ownership right after after her death okay yes an extension do you think would be appropriate during um January January the meeting we haven't set um unfortunately we haven't set up the calendar yet and we'll be providing that calendar for next year um on December 18th we can do it for we can give them an EXT I mean a continuance till December 18th I'll get in touch with the property owner for a progress report is that okay everyone all right I would make a motion then in cases c24 d662 663 and 665 that they be tabled to December's code meeting for an update I second all in favor iOS motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.6 for 8:30 Northeast 116th Street this is for case number Cen 24471 Matthew bone Ashley cbook bone I pronounced that right um we they were found to be in violation of chapter 8.4.2 property maintenance for their mail mailbox that was loose on the ground they have now uh corrected this violation and are in compliance any questions no any questions sure I'd like in case number uh c-24 472 I'll make a motion I no a violation occur make a motion that a violation has occurred assess a fine of $250 plus administrative cost of 250 and that it courtesy this has been pending since the courtesy notice of July the 3 a second we have a motion and a second all in favor I iOS motion passes 5 Z next item 8.7 same address same Property Owners this is for case number cn- 24472 um the address on the property was not displayed so they were inv found to be in violation of chapter 8.46 they are now in compliance I'd like to make a motion in cn24 472 a violation did occur but they have since come into compliance assess a $250 fine and a $250 admin fee second all in favor I opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.8 for the same address and same Property Owners this is for case number c-24 d584 they were found to be in violation of section 18.5.19 um 8.8 no I i' like to make a motion on case number c-24 d584 that a violation occurred it's now in compliance that's a f of 250 250 administrative costs second we have a motion in a second all in favor I I oppose motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.9 for for the property located at 931 Northeast 120th Street this is for case number cn- 24289 property owners at 931 North East 120th at LLC we are asking for an order of enforcement they were found to be in violation of 16.13 exterior paint permit the wall on the left side of the dup duplex has a large Rusty Mark and the wall on the right side of the duplex has paint chipping at the bottom I only see pictures on the left side you any on the right viation is the left the left right side is the property owner here no no questions well no questions I'll just make a comment I do see a courtesy notice was given back in May the 3 2024 and the not notice of violation was on September the 17th with compliance date of uh 102 um has has there been any correspondence from the property owner there has been no correspondence from that property owner so may are they so are they living there at the property at the property they have tenants there but no property owner okaye property dlex address is yes and this property has been advertised for sale um there no questions I'd like to make a motion on case number c-24 289 uh that property is in violation a violation has occurred assess a fine of $250 plus administrative cost of $250 uh come into compliance by November 24th or $250 per day fond thereafter a second the right yeah that's their iPad how it side that's your right I'm sorry Jo the compliance date the 24th yes 11:24 okay because pulling a permit if it's a pre approved color requires it does okay I'll second all all in favor I I I any opposed motion passes 5 Z moving on to 8.1 8.12 and 8.13 is 10 one starting at 8.10 11 12 and 13 the property uh located at 10801 Griffin Boulevard and property owner is Griffin Miami LLC in care of their registered agent Zen business Inc we had an issue with this particular property owner they had um paid some um violations that had fines on them and fees however the vendor informed us that the the fees were contested disputed and um we had to bring them to the board so we could get leans on this um on these uh four violations however they did come in and pay the violations so they are in compliance so all all of these cases all all four of them right um well if there are no questions I'd like to make a motion on case number c-23 d353 c-24 d468 c-24 d475 and c-24 D 476 that the lines have been paid and move to close I'll second all in favor iose motion passes 5 next item 8.14 this is for the property located at 11270 Northeast 11th Avenue the case number is Cen 24486 Swami real estate Corp we asking for an order of enforcement they were found to be in violation of 16.14 dable fines for columns that were installed in front of the property facing 9th Avenue without first obtaining permits are you it's 9th a okay 11 11 no it's not it is 9 it's just ninth okay oh Ninth Avenue you're right sorry I'll just I talk my name is Danel I'm the okay questions from the board any questions what so the the the violation is just for not getting the uh the permits not the columns the colum but but the columns are okay they just get a permit colums are fine but they need to get permits for them they need to to go through planning and design review in fact the violation was reported by the chairperson for the planning and design review they said this is not optic code so we don't know if the we don't know if the uh columns are fine and that's right until they go through Planning and Zoning again looking at positioning we don't know if they're setback it appears to be in this anchored that's what happens when things get done minus the permitting process they are beautiful yes they are but I have to say they're not like build they're just Coral columns that we put to put the address because it was really hard to find it even if you would to find the address I'm sorry if you would your name and your relationship okay danina I am the tenant the owner because it's under a company so it's all that it's not so much what they're built out of or whatever it's placement it's securing them again but something outside yes could go Airborne or it could fall on a child I mean they need five people to move them but the only reason we thought it was okay which I have no problem going through all the process and trying to see I mean I can just remove them my landscaper was the one who installed them it's not a big honesty deal but we see all over the neighbor like this concrete rocks to protect their outside the prop property line that we didn't think this was Major we were just making a beautiful and try to show our address because it's hard find have to make absolutely excuse the concern would be if there was a child standing there and a car tapped into it and it fell over on a child um also it appears to be in the sale it doesn't appear to be on your property so you're not allowed to put anything unless it's vegetation that's not on your property okay but that's up to pnz whether it meets they they'll they'll ask you for a survey and how they're secured and all that and they're not so I would just probably have to remove them because they're just extremely heavy you need five people to install them but they're not they're just placed in there that is the reality so I'll probably just remove them instead of going through all that trouble wish should would I wish you would try really I'll try I'll give it a shot any other questions can I have a motion I'll make a motion on case number c-24 d486 that a violation has occurred that's aying of $250 administrative cost of 250 and the uh property owner to apply for for permit by and obtain a permit by December the 18th or to or remove um if not uh by December the 18th if not a $250 fine second all in favor I any opposed motion passes 5 Z I have one more call me next item is 8.15 for the same address and same property owner we asking for an order of re enforcement in case number cn- 24- 497 double permit fees for a trellis installed on the property facing 9th Avenue without first obtaining permits isn't that kind of in their interior yard because their whole yard is fced off but but if you're facing night actually facing my driver yes yeah but if you're building anything on the exterior trellis or whatever I mean when I put up my screen enclosure and it was just screening I had to get everything permitted and inspected from the slab on up any structure needs a permit do I need a GC for then do I need to get a general contractor for this for the per you can you can apply for permits as a property owner but it's up to you if you want to use a contractor year okay just what they would just apply for the permit and thenay the dou and then just be done correct when they apply for the permit the idea is it goes through the process of planning and design reviewing to ensure that it's properly done and it's up to code and then it goes through plan uh building review to make sure it was properly done and if they pass it and the permits are paid for we comp comply the case I walk every day and that too may be something that requires a survey because I have to tell you when we put in hand railing had to have a survey for the permit yeah yeah you everything in this town requires permits we are right now on we're working with and I thought I was going to be able to get this done before because we are doing a whole remodelation of the house we're on working with an architect to almost not knock it down but a lot of it to make it bigger for our families so we know all this is going to go anyway it's going to be gone sooner than later okay any further questions if not I'll make a motion in case cn24 497 a violation did occur assess a $250 fine 250 admin fee come into compliance by pulling a permit or removing by December 18th or 250 daily perect second all in favor I any opposed well for the reason of the description that it says is facing 9th Avenue and I don't think that it is and the other things that I saw from the discussion no okay so motion passes five four try it again 41 thank you thank you have a good night 8.16 another case 4140 Northeast 8th Court this is case number Cen 247 d278 property appraisal information protected you've already heard two cases on this property that came for intent to lean this is new case and we're asking for an order of enforcement for a large hole in in the S on the Eastern side of the house this is the property owner that's not talking to you anymore correct um I have a question uh to obtain a permit for um the correction or replacement of I mean of of the sofit would that have to go before P and D I'm not sure yeah that would be I didn't have to when I had to repair mine I had to pull a permit but because I was replacing what was already existing I didn't have to go in front of them I think it depends on the size of the project for some permits yeah permit yes but I I have a feeling when it's replaced probably would not unless they see it is so major but it's not going to not going to make a visual difference I wouldn't think anyway if there's no more questions we have a motion in case number c-24 d708 like to uh make a motion that a violation has occurred assess a fine of $250 plus $250 administrative costs come into compliance by having a permit pulled by November the 24th or a $250 per day F therea second all in favor I I any opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.17 for the same address and same property owner case number c-24 d709 we asking for an order of enforcement this property is very poorly maintained there are a lot of unsightly trash and objects on the front porch any questions questions in that case I'll make a motion in Cas cn24 d79 a violation has occurred assess a $250 fine 250 admin fee if the property owner until November 24th to come into compliance or 250 daily second go ahead J all in favor I I any opposed motion passes 5 Z next item 8.18 property address 11820 Northeast 12pt case number c-24 d607 for Sean and lordes do we're asking for an order of enforcement for a trailer that's um parked on the property on the right side of the property facing 12 court right um this is in violation of chapter 7.3.1 conditions for store storage of recreational vehicles and trailers that all the same trailer or three different ones it's all the same trailer I assume I can't see what you're looking at I only have one trailer the white green one and yeah so okay my name is Sean DL I the property owner so um yeah so I bought the trailer because I have a pickup truck as well but I'm hoping to sell it and you know I always need things whatever I'm doing and so I needed a a trailer and so I like the idea of a pickup truck trailer because it's versatile so I bought it and then Luciano said you can't have a recreational or not a recreational utility trailer so I've been trying to sell it and as you can imagine the the first picture it's taller uh and it's green kind of unsightly if you depending on if you ask my wife especially um but uh so all the feedback I got was that it's too tall don't really like it and so it's been for sale for a while so I said okay let me let me fix the things the feedback that I'm getting so I lowered it and I I painted it a primer gray um so that hopefully it's a little more appealing fact of the matter is I'm still trying to sell it I don't I don't know where to put it I mean if I I'm happy to park it here I'm happy to park it at the police station I don't know where else to keep it other than my driveway there are storage facilities that you can park it at and that's where most people have recreational vehicles around here they'll find a storage facility that they can rent a space at to park it okay or can if it can fit in the back of your property or to the side with a fence uh it possibly could fit behind the fence but then if you'll I was here before about having a fence issue and I don't want to take the fence down to put the trailer there and then be in violation for that not a gooda so I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place here problem I'm having is it's already gone on three months and we have a lot of people who I'm sure are not happy with the fact that they can't have trailers RVs whatever in the front yard so there's a limit to how far we can go we got a price too high well that's the thing I I don't have it priced to high I had it for 750 I mean I I don't know when else I I could park it somewhere and just give it away at this point I mean because if I get hit with all these fines and then if I pay a monthly fee somewhere I'm definitely I've got more in storage Fe is that cars for kids maybe they want a trailer there's there's I mean WLRN takes donated Vehicles you get a little tax write off tax ride off for it but there's other maybe that's the way to go I mean yeah I'm just kind of I'm at a loss I don't know I can't put it anywhere I don't know how to sell it any faster otherwise it would be gone already oh you did this you did the literal you put the cart before the horse right exact oh well yeah I there are plenty of people in the neighborhood that have utility trailers so I don't I didn't see the issue before I bought it I I mean I think that that's obvious I known it was going to be a violation I never would have bought it but um so yeah I literally put the cart before the horse and now I I'm kind of stuck I don't know what to do I'm open to suggestions I guess I could donate it that's the best suggestion I have because I I can't just drop it somewhere then I'm gonna get not a good idea you know so I don't know or if you have a neighbor who has a backyard it would fit in to let you put it there temporarily until do you have one Jude no now my my you can see clear through my fence yeah wouldn't help you so and and so one thing Luciana did say is is if it's beside the house then maybe that's a thing but mine's a duplex and so the front the the one unit is up front and mine's kind of off in the back and then it's technically in front of my house not beside it even though it's beside the the structure it's not beside yeah so I guess donate I I I genuinely do not know what to do un unless anyone knows someone that wants to buy a trailer or knows that needs a trailer at this point apparently I'm giving it away too if there's no more questions can I have a motion case number case number c-24 d607 the violation has occurred $250 fine $250 administrative fee and to come in compliance by November the 24th or $250 per day they F thereafter I mean do you think November 24th you can figure it out by then yeah I mean if I'm gonna be donating it it won't take that long I just like what two weeks two weeks I don't have anywhere to take it well the day is the 6 yep um I mean he's had actually since uh August the 14th well he's been trying to sell it $750 is apparently too high I know I had a similar I'm only going by experience with a trailer that we had and and Lou was cited well it took no time for him to find a a place to put it okay um at Public Storage so and I pay each month we pay each month so a lot of people want to be able to keep their RVs and trailers and front more they see people doing it the more it's like well why not meet so we have to kind of balance well I understand but he's making active efforts if you're comfortable that you can get get it done by 1124 then I'm fine with that I mean I I yeah I'll be able to get rid of it but I mean I'm going have to give it away apparently selling it it's not gonna happen I've been trying I went all the effort to paint it and and appeal to a broader audience but offer up and that's Facebook and you know or no next next door yeah neighbors okay so anybody from the village let them know also that they have to put it yeah well there's plenty of people we all walk around there's at least four trailers in people's driveways that I see every day but there happening there are some situations where people have been grandfathered but there are also situations where these folks may we cited them already I'm sorry we may have cited them already also before the code changed that didn't allow for them anymore people who had them at that time so long as they were licensed and whatever were allowed to be grandfathered in for that one vehicle if they could prove they couldn't get it behind the front facing of the house right if they couldn't get it before the front face of the house and I second's motion all in favor I any opposed so to be clear the the fines are happening regardless whether or not I get rid of it before the 24th no no that's yeah the violation fine yeah and and the administrative uh cost of the daily fine will start yeah you don't want to deal that do you need a trailer I'll drop it off of your house free delivery have a I don't have a little pitch on my Tes all right Sean it couldn't ask it could Hur to ask the guys in public works yeah they may know somebody okay ask some of you know Village staff they may know okay sounds good well like I said I was trying to sell it not give it away but now and maybe somebody in public works would buy it for cheap to reach nobody's even offered 500 I mean it's not that I've been playing hard ball with them yeah wouldn't to reach out to those guys some of them have Landscaping businesses and whatever yeah you never know okay all right thank you all and I hope we don't see each other like this again I hope so hope who was the second Janie was Janie I thank you next item is 8.19 for the property located at 12022 Griffin Boulevard this is for case number c-24 d190 Harmon and I do not want Beno figeroa want to mess up your name I go by Ben it's easier all right Ben hi and we are asking for a continuance because he was not going to attend but here now so so I open I open a permit one second sir one second let me finish let the board have their right so we have found them to be in violation of 16.3 building permits they had installed Windows without first obtaining permits so we were going to ask for a continuance like I I was saying because he was UN aable to attend but he's here so we are asking for an order of enforcement like he first appli the property owner first applied back in May May the violation violation of April yeah the the notice of violation was April 23d but it shows that he applied for the permit in May but there's nothing since that we have any update from PN did it ever end up in front of PNC what was the did he is it says receipt of notorized application on hold because the application I believe was not notorized it wasn't complete no the application is notorized there were some questions in the am I able to speak now okay all right uh there were some questions on the on the application I called um I believe I spoke to uh Luciano nibs Mr nibs and he gave me some guidance I went in to attempt to complete the application it required some information that I didn't have and this all stem from the fact that we actually had somebody who was going to do the windows a contractor who ripped us off and you know long story but here we are so I took the job over myself and I've been slowly getting it done so what I'm asking for is the time for me to complete the permit which I can do by the end of this week and then I'll come back and apply I know there's a double uh a double find for the permit so I'll comply whatever is necessary just give an opportunity to finish a job one that you started without having the permit and two nothing since ma'am let me let me correct that that statement I I did not start it without permit I hired somebody to start it let me let me explain how we got here I hired somebody to start it and the person stole the money and what have you and I had to take over so therefore I learned at that point when I re there was a notice placed on my door I learned at that point what I needed to do and I took action there were some there was some information in fact in my permit application I I put in a lot of documents to support what I'm what I'm telling you um and in the process there are some very specific questions that I didn't know how to answer I actually went to the window manufacturer uh who's located in H I found to the labels to get additional labels and screws that I needed learning everything from YouTube uh and that's where I'm at I I'm going to comply I'm going to I I know I started it and I didn't follow through because there were other things going on but I'm I'm pressed I'm here I changed my schedule yesterday I I attempted to get a continuance for next month um I was told that you guys were going to have this hearing without me attending and I am behem opposed to having somebody speak on on about me on my property without me being present to address it just for future reference sir and believe me anybody who's done construction work in South Florida we know there can be various just let's say ethical issues with some contractors but it still comes down to property owner yes I and I acknowledge and I accept it The Bu stops with each of us as Property Owners but the permit is also going to have to go in front of planning and design I know I had to do that with my windows Yep okay I I'll make I'll follow through like I said I will complete the application and I'll move forward my original intention were to ask for a continuance thinking that this could be postponed to next week um I I believe it was you Miss Grant who explained to me that the next hearing was uh December the 18th so what I did I moved things so I could be here today because I didn't my wa but if if I'm allowed by the 18th I'll be in full compliance there's no more questions can I have a motion okay uh I'll make a motion on Cen 24- 190 that a violation has occurred and that we assess a $250 fine with the $250 Administration um fee um and that we give a date of what's the date we've been using is it December 18th December 18th um for things to have gone through p and z and the permits to be taken care of otherwise it'll be a $250 day fine second all in favor I any oppos no I was just say yes we'll do thank you I'm gonna vote I vote no motion passes 41 but yes okay I'm sorry what's the difference between the yes and the no just I didn't think that you should have got I would I would have would have given you a thank get all those done and they come back and compliance I I appreciate it but once building starts without a permit we're kind of understood we can't not we can't pretend it didn't happen exactly right understood and thank you thank you all for your time and please sir if you can our meeting is December 18th I'll be here I already have it on my calendar thank you good oh thank you there good to see you next item is 8.20 for1 12085 West Dixie Highway it's for case number c-24 d706 partio doour they were found to be in violation of chapter 1 19. 1.3.9 a and be short-term vacation rental license required horatia is advertising to rent a property on a short-term basis without first obtaining a permit a license questions from the board yes any questions from the board on this case no all right sir if you would identify yourself in your relationship sorry sorry sorry my English is bad bad bad only for publ McDonald I speak with Rafael Rodriguez Rafael you want can you translate did anybody have an objection we'll let the gentleman speak in Spanish and Rafael would you translate I'd be fine the gentleman will be more comfortable in okay okay thank you [Music] well dlex okay hear from ra okay okay before he has too much okay this is okay uh so Mr orio um um he went to Argentina for some eye surgery so he was there for a while what during his absence his son who also resides on the property um went ahead and listed the the unit with Airbnb without his knowledge so prior um then we um issued the um I think it's a notice was it a notice violation October yeah so then we should location so so therefore when he came back he found the notice from us so his intent I think excuse me so um so upon his return then he went ahead head and um took off the listing from Airbnb and so it's no longer being advertized um through Airbnb and he's going to go back to Argentina to proceed with the eye surgery we have confirmation that it has been removed from the platform the package we are passing around was printed at 3 p.m. today the property is still being advertised on Airbnb when did he go for the surgery now he said that um couple before coming into the hearing the hearing um he son told him that he son took down the listing this this says document day going back to 2016 also there's a review from September this year that um addresses his hospitality and mentions him by name or is you're a very good host ear oh okay um so he's going to proceed and apply for the license the stvr he's going to yes spe for speee foree hope you got a good memory [Music] ra oh he was just sharing with me an issue that he's having with FPL so there's some electrical issues in his property and he he contacted FPL five time and he hasn't been taken care of so he wanted to know if there was anything we could do to help him city does have some contact with fpnl um I know our prior managers did and I am sure that you can dig up the information if you can't I'll be happy to reach out to Mario um yeah um we can check with Dena because she pretty much deals with issues like this so then discuss that but we need to kind of get this to a conclusion yeah so the conclusion is that he is going to apply for the rental the stbr license and he the violation was without his consent while he was traveling in Argentina he is going to apply for he's going to apply for the license so if we have no further questions could we have a motion let you guys do it um I'll make a motion in case number cn-4 706 given the testimony of the property owner that it was done without his consent I'd like to just assess an administrative fine of $250 and uh to have the come into compliance by either removing the listing or pulling the um application uh or obtaining the application by November the 24th the violations violation been going on since 2016 that wasn't what was brought before us okay I mean the citation and to be fair to Horatio the ordinance wasn't active in 2016 well um 2021 come into compliance by November the 26 that's um if not a $250 per day find there so right now it's just the administrative fee of 250 fly by November the 26th if not a $250 per day F thereafter oh second favor hi any oppos motion passes 5 Z could U you so I'm going to explain to him yeah [Music] or take it off or or or take it off no on second see for [Music] exactly exact we do have to R this you could please translate oh yeah yeah well I'm just telling you know that that he he needs to apply what basically what Rafael said that he needs to apply for the permit for the permit for for the rental 246 you know any time from tomorrow till then you know he's he's he was assuming that you know he had to do it by then he said he's not all that's some that's something he needs that's something he needs to go into Village Hall and talk we need to go to the next case see good rapael thank thank you Senor thank you very much thank you those were all the cases we had for the board tonight however had said the G the lady for the property 720 right she she's here it's up to the board if you want to speak with her or give her a moment 720 Northeast 117 street that the one 117 yeah yes the first six cases they've already ruled on the cases um and we'll be preparing orders if you had anything you wanted to tell them you can your name and your relationship to the property please of course uh Kirsten gral I'm the assistant to Jeffrey KH he's the property owner so first of all you got late right yeah one minute late needs to be swor in please raise your right hand do you swear or affirm that the testimony about to give would be the truth the whole Tru or nothing but the truth yes perfect so I do have a site plan with me I don't know if you guys want to look at it so the whole purpose of this property is going to be an investment property the violations that we've had on the property granted they were supposed to get taken care of so I know that's the owner's responsibility so the whole plan moving forward is to get them taken care of so we can move forward and continue with the renovations we have a whole entire plan to upkeep the property I know the current state definitely says otherwise but again it's an investment property we want to get it up to par the other homes in the neighborhood they they're really nice so the complaint we hear you guys out completely I just we moving forward with the leans it's going to inhibit us to continue to make changes the contractor won't work with us right now got over $20,000 a piece yeah I know but I I I do want to say we came into compliance with everything before the dates that were set last meeting you didn't allow inspections on the pool yeah the owner didn't allow you guys on the property so that's not compliance issues there's a significant amount of fines outstanding and the almost bigger issue is is not allowing our code off to reinspect that we have what two or three violations that we don't know 18,500 that for the mosquitoes and for the pool that were required because he said no and he's a business he's sophisticated he's got some assistant we kind of I I just started in September so there was an assistant that said that apparently you know you can't go on the property or whatever and nobody speaks for me and and all that stuff and now he got a daily fine because he was you know not allowing help him yeah and let me just explain so I don't want to paint him in a bad light but his understanding was that the violation was given based on whoever had looked over the neighbor's property I believe is that correct so his understanding was okay can they not look at to make sure we're in compliance with the pool especially with viewing it the same way it was given but I I I understand you guys still have to look at the property yourself take your own photos that's what Daren was telling me so I guess just moving forward we want to make changes to the property so what's the next step so we can do that if the leans are put on there it makes us a lot harder to do that job we don't have a chice question of the village how long does it take to follow lean if if they pay off um the current fines within the next uh 10 days would the village have proceeded that quickly no so you may have a two weeks they may have right if we can get on the property and close out the cases for the swimming pool that's if they're in compliance you they can pay the $500 for the bigger leans you can come December 18 and ask for reductions only if there's compliance okay and then let me make one more Point as well so the paint job that was done for the property maintenance on the exterior of the home that was submitted I Believe by me on October the 9th that one is good we CL that one but you have $500 outstanding yes no and and that's fine and then there was another permit for the driveway walkway slab so that went against the planning board so we all we need to do is do the swall the swall sale sorry for the RightWay because the impervious impervious calculations were not correct so we're we're working on it your your bigger issues are the two pool issues that the gentleman will not allow okay so yeah we'll definitely get you guys to come on the property and get it taken care of finds continue to build okay until he allows for inspection and they can see compliance so w50 a day 71 72 73 74 and let me see I don't know about oh yeah 74 those are $500 each those are just the original violations that that need and and and administrative costs that haven't been paid by doing starting whatever you needed to well like they said the other two as of today you're at 92 9,250 each continue once youve coming he's coming to clients and had the village do it then you can come before us and ask for a fine reduction if it's been complied with if not then you know I would think that the village has already been directed to move so you may want to move on that quickly so that tomorrow yeah so that the village doesn't move forward with following those leans they've already been um it's 500 a day right 250 250 a day no yeah 250 on each on each 50 a day on each violation of the those two probably would have been a couple $500 fin just like the other one if he hadn't said don't come on my property exactly so you got to tell that guy he's got to like you know work with uh Village I mean you know he got violated and he's they're trying to help him help his own situation yeah I guess the way he's been looking at it is just there's a bunch of fines so it's just been overwhelming but I I completely hear you what he did by by by his perspective that he made it worse right right it was kind productive for to do that yeah and we don't want to fight I I know we've had some conversations as well the goal is just to come to into compliance we can make make changes make some Revenue hopefully more $500 he has almost almost 10,000 okay they can come on so I do have one more quick question um just to make sure I go over everything so for the pool I know I had sent her photos as well with the whole cleaning making sure it's not a mosquito breeding ground before the date of the cut off but it's still not usable to take away those fees because legally Legally for example no one can Cote officers cannot write violations based on third- party info all right they also can't close a violation based on third party info they have to witness we can take it into consideration if you provided it yeah but right now I get it until you go on there yeah okay that's fine see it okay and you can come before us for a fine reduction okay and I believe you guys needed written authorization from the owner correct to get on the property so can we take that am I okay to give uh consent to Rafael to go my concern if it's not in writing okay is your owner has shown a propensity for kind of not being one of the things that we heard was T night was that apparently there was initial consent go actor through an assistant yeah that would have been me nobody speaks on my me right and and you got all out under the collar about the fact that you had allowed uh the village to do their job and get on the property and then after that that's when he shut it off so you know that's you know why one of the reasons why we require writing because get situations like that yeah and again I'm not the owner I was open to the idea so it's it's not always in my control but I will get authorization from him tomorrow no worries after tonight's meeting if we can come up with some type of brainstorming and solution I'm fine with it so no worries of course is compliance yeah I know I know I know want that contract yeah no worries yeah so much I appreciate you hanging in there end yeah I'm trying to get everything up to code so hopefully now that I'm you know in the picture we can get everything done and moving forward for everything we do if if our people don't see it it's not to code yeah it's the same with with the building permit if the building official is not allowed on the property to inspect it it's not done and it won't be passed you can't send them pictures they don't know if the pictures are of that property or another property in today's world of Photoshop and other things visual no it makes sense now yeah thank you guys for your time appreciate thank you little discussions I promise to keep it very very Bri um what is thank you did everyone read I one question on it and I may have Miss I may not have written it down correctly on 8.9 did I had that Michael had um seconded 89 was Dale and James pardon was Dale and yeah I may have miswrote on mine I that's why I was just asking if anybody else yeah I have Dale and Judy okay all right then I have no Dale and Janie I'm sorry did I say Judy down here is D and Judy and I have D and JY on my writing oh are you minutes oh it's the minutes we're looking at this girl September on my notes I have the L 9 okay that's fine did you say Dale and Judy for 8.9 not today 8.9 the minutes 8.9 the minutes yeah we have it correct I just wanted clarification sometimes I don't get two second things and I just wanted to clarify okay do I have a motion to approve I make a motion to approve the minutes of September the 18th all second all in favor I any opposed okay what is the procedure for expired permit somebody has a permited they have renewed it the maximum amount of time are allowed do the village follow because we're just seeing so many languishing that's it there a said yeah so in the past what has been happening was when a permit expired it just sits there now if someone else wants to buy the property or property owner comes in for another type of permit the building clerk now notices there's another expired permit she does send them note um emails or messages sometimes not always but if she notices that they have a permit that didn't go through or has expired they charge them the full amount plus half is it depending on the type of permit or double for an expired permit MH I believe it's a full amount and a half I I could be wrong but they charge them to close it they just don't close it if someone comes in for a lean search and there's an expired permit they have to pay for them to close the permit now recently we've looked at the permits like uh the chairperson says there's been too many so when we find these permits now we started bringing these cases to the board so that they can be um closed out or ruled upon because they can't just leave these permits apply for permits and just leave exactly because you're starting to hear from more and more people you know that there are jobs that have already been done the permit doesn't get closed out and it just sits there so thank you one other quick question the alternate does he get the um agendas and everything every yes all I needed to know because now I can follow through we did send an email inviting him to this hearing by the way I did call yes but I left the voice message I wanted to know so I can then approach the commission that they need to find another alternate wait minute no I still have questions on the permitting that and I'll keep it quick Janie that you brought up so a pay a permit that has expired you'll be bringing them before us correct I mean I mean the qu I my question is so you you'll be looking and going the it hasn't been done correct so a per perit would never close and it will have an outstanding amount in the system if it's not closed so I'll bring them to the board because now they have this find that's sitting there they don't pay it and close it we lean the property I mean we come here to get the order to lean the property it's mean oh I'm just trying to think so if they pull the permit to pull a permit to paint and the property's Never painted and it's never been before us yes then what would you be citing them if the permit is expired and they never painted it wouldn't you be also site I mean citing them for um paint to paint the property I mean that you no longer have a valid permit yes that's what the process should be actually okay right because whether the permit's expired or not they have to do the work they need to do the work I mean if the permit's expired you no longer have a permit you may have paid I mean it's a free permit to begin with so the issue would be if it's painting job you're bring a notice of violation to paint your paint your property now correction if someone just wants to paint a their house for leisure it's not a violation we are not bringing that kind of permit here no the free permit right there are a lot of permits that people apply for that they start a job and they are supposed to get a final per um inspection they never get a final inspection you'll be surprised how many permits we found that people never got a final inspection and they're sitting there for two and three years those are the type of permits I'm talking about you mean like installing a bathroom and they never install a bathroom I never they they continued living in the house sold the house without a final permit yes I just want to know what we were talking what are we looking at and what's our remedy because yes remedy for us is to bring them finalize the permit or finalize the permit right or a daily fine or something or daily fine or we Le the for the outstanding amount okay some repercussion just to make them comply I got a better understanding expired expired permits usually an open permit we don't touch because an open permit means something is still going on and some permits can be open for two years some permits can be open for six months so we don't touch those we're talking about expired per motion to adjourn second favor I