##VIDEO ID:QZm0VsNfcQo## good right e e I'd like to call to order the village of bisane Park Cod compliance meeting Wednesday September 18 it is 6:01 p.m. this is a meeting of the village of biscane Park Cod compliance board the board is au oh I'm sorry let me back off a second Vanessa would you call the role okay Jenny Anderson Dell blinton present Roda baranto Judy hammerberg here Michael L here Daren C Grant Luciana nibs present Rafael Gres Vanessa Cherry present getting ahead on myself sorry this is the meeting of the village of biscane Park Code Compliance board the board is authorized pursuant to chapter 14 of The Village's Land Development code to ensure compliance with The Village's code of ordinances the members of this board are citizens and residents of the village of biscane Park we volunteer our time and are not paid for our services the purpose of each hearing is to give any alleged violators the opportunity to contest the decision of the co- compliance officer which resulted in the issuance of a notice of violation and to determine whether a violation of The Village's code has occurred or is occurring we are not authorized to dismiss violations based on hardships ignorance of the or the fact that others may be guilty of the same violation these hearings are conducted in a quasy Judicial manner our responsibilities is to act much like a judge in a court that is to hear cases presented by The Village's Code Compliance officers and to hear contradictory arguments presented by the alleged violators we are not authorized to change the code The Village commission is solely authorized to enact or revise codes conversely neither the commission nor the manager have the authority to overwhel the findings of the board pursuant to chapter 162 of the Florida statute orders of the board can only be appealed to the Circuit Court of Miami Dade County we have the authority to assess and order the payment of civil penalties to issue orders having the force of law to command whatever steps are necessary to bring a violation into compliance and to assess administrative costs in order to make a finding upholding The Code Compliance officer's decision we must find that there is substantial competent evidence that the named violator was responsible for a violation of the relevant section of the code AS charge all documentary evidence presented by the parties must be submitted for placement in the hearing file no documentary evidence will be considered unless the alleged violator or C- compliance officer submits a copy for the hearing file each party shall have the right to call and examine witnesses to introduce exhibits to cross-examine opposing Witnesses on any matter relevant to the issues even though that matter was not covered in the direct examination to impeach any witness regardless of which party first call them to testify and to rebut the evidence against them if you intend to address the board and you haven't signed in please do so and anyone wanting to address the board please stand and raise your right hand Vanessa will administer the oath please stand please raise your right hand do you swear or affirm that the testimon you about to give will be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth are there any additions deletions or changes to the agenda just an update Dorian Grant Code Compliance board Department this is an update for case number e-22 0383 for the property located at 826 Northeast 121st Street this case was heard today before the Miami dat County and safe structure board um the building official did present the case however attorneys for the respondent asked that the case be postponed by a month so the case has been postponed by a month V house V house Reserve thank you I I would like to see the minutes be moved to the end oh yeah Vanessa H please if you would always put the the minutes at the end because sometimes it takes us a little bit of time and it's not fair for these folks thank you um I want to add if we could a discussion item the October meeting date October 16th yes if we one board dar's going to be absent and if there's any way we can change it but that's for the end ready for the first case again my name is Doran Grant from The Code Compliance board I'm sorry Code Compliance Department first case is in Old business it's um under 7.1 for the property located at 739 Northeast 118th Street it's case number c-23 d285 belonging to pbp6 LLC in care of their registered agent rodon Law PC we're bringing this case before the board because we found them to be in violation of chapter 5 .6 off street parking for a driveway that does not meet design standards they are they have applied for a permit however they haven't paid the $500 that's um owing for the violation and administrative cost and we're asking for an intent to lean but they have applied for the permit they have comments from the board as for the record the permit that has been applied for is a permit for demolition they will demolish the property and change the whole structure oh I remember this one yeah because I the daily F did stop however the $500 which is for the violation and and the administrative cost is still outstanding I believe not I'll make motion any questions Bo I'm good um on case number c-23 d285 I would um direct the make a motion to direct The Village to affirm and direct the to affirm the outstanding in fine and administrative cost totaling $500 and to request the move that the village move forward with filing a lean I second um shouldn't lean fees be added to that filing fees so file the intent just to make sure we know your motion file the intent to lean for the outstanding 500 any applicable filing fee please go ahead and process that okay and and before um Dorian with regard to the building application that was on August 21st like what's the status of that um I haven't looked at the status of the application but we can it's dem2 24-6 we'll give you the update in a minute because I mean I thought that when this came up the guy wasn't like a guy that was here and he was saying that they're going to demolish it and were like we why are we going to make him do that when that's a different case that's a different one that was a different property okay status of the perit on September 11th 2024 we have um a plumbing plans review plans must be stamped and approved by durm so that's being currently held held up in the building department so the permits are in process they are waiting for durm to approve okay so is this motion that is now going to hit the sky for these for for fines for not getting a driveway done when we already know he's going to demolish the building and he's in that process I'm just trying to understand that is that what we're saying that's up to the board to decide at the time this was heard none of that was present I would imagine this was already heard uh back November was it the notice of violation was November of last year apparently bear with me I got no problem reaffirming with the property Chang hands after that but the original violation was heard in November I'm sorry August of 23 they had time to come into compliance before selling the property and property owner now has plans so so this is a new property owner from when it was first a inherent I have no problem reaffirming but I'm just saying that the understanding is that this thing is going to get raised and they're going to build something else but we're going to be finding them for not having a driveway in but we're not we're not doing daily fines this is just the fine for the original infra the for the Reformation okay and that's it no no continuing no no all right and understand this the original owner like some of them have come in and said why am I going to put a driveway up I'm tearing the house exactly right got it got it original owners who simply ignored the nous nervous of violation hence the fine and we know that this uh notification for tonight was sent to the new owner right yes he was and and our staff is working on it it's taking their time the city should be reimbursed for it yeah and if we don't lean the property it's not going to be right yeah no I just want to understand the scope of it because I had a misunderstanding so now I understand have a motion in a second all in favor I I motion passes start zero next item is under old business it's item number 7.2 for the property located at 1103 Northeast 117th Street case number c n -23 d447 the new owners of this property at Aqua king1 r l LC through their registered agent Thomas G Sherman PA we were bringing this case uh tonight for a progress report however they have applied for a permit a permit has now been issued and i' would like to enter into the record permit number D ws-24 d43 for a drive way um it would be up to the board if they want to continue this case for another progress report or close it Al together there is a copy of the building permit that's correct it's been issued issued we're good they're good yeah but it but if we close it and they don't go ahead and do it so should we keep it open would recite them I don't think we want to keep it open because they' technically come into compliance correct so if they don't then it becomes a new case because right now they've got a viable permit they've complied as I was at City Hall when a gentleman came in and said I don't care I'll take out the permit I'm not putting a driveway in we've had several cases like that however if a permit is not issued there's a difference between a permit being applied for and a permit per being issued this permit has been issued meaning it's gone through the process and they're ready to build that understand I totally understand what Judy saying someone may rather pay the few hundred for the permit and just let it expire right then you guys will be back out there but we can't continue a case the technically is inli but thank you that's a very good point so do I have a motion yes I'd like to make a motion on case number cn- 23-4 4 47 that they have come into compliance and to close the case second second Michael so the second was Michael or Judy Michael all in favor I iOS motion passes 5 next case is item 7.3 for the address 119 21-23 noreast 12th Avenue case number is c-23 d339 foret M and Janee Pierre this is a progress report for a driveway the plans have now been approved um aret is not here today um she's just waiting to start building she has an outstanding fine of$ 375 she paid $125 of the 500 that was assessed last notation I'm seeing she still had to bring in the impervious perious information did she do that she did that and the plans have been approved by planning and design not she did plans have been approved by planning and design good to go yeah I did see that she's on this coming um planning and design review now the issue of course is there's still $375 outstanding I would like to see us set a deadline for that 375 to be paid if not come back because see the way I understand it from the attorney is that we can't just say start theine process it has to be essentially a hearing and since it's not notated tonight F an intent toine I I don't think that's the route we should take but I would like to give a deadline and then say if she doesn't meet the deadline bring it back in October's meeting for the intent to lean you please speak in the mic Miss Madame chair he we can hear you okay let me try let me try that one again better yes thank you um according to the attorney As I understood it there has to be an actual hearing before even the intent to lean can be initiated so since it's not agendized as an attent to lean tonight I would like to make make a motion that we set October 1st as her deadline for paying the remaining $375 if she doesn't bring her back at the October meeting for the intent to leave well if I remember this resident neighbor uh she's the one that had to get a uh a new contractor and all that stuff correct yes I think that looking at it she made a partial payment of 125 bucks like back in June 13 so it sounded like finances were a very uh integral part of this process and the delay and all that stuff I mean you know $375 is a lot of money I me if F was a nurse or something like that or or some kind of a caregiver um yeah obviously you know the money is ow but you know as far as the leash and how long it is you know before we start leaning your house I don't want to give like 30 days and we're going to start leaning your house maybe do a progress report in uh October I don't remember we don't I said if she doesn't pay it by I'm sorry my motion was that if she doesn't pay it by October 1st we bring her back at October's meeting for the intent toan hearing when she has the time to come in and represent herself explain because it's still outstanding no but that's two weeks that's two weeks my thought is that the village I mean the village would just bring it back as they have on several cases when they saw fit to um place because if the property owner is cooperating and paying to get the permit and they're in the process because she will be having some uh cost Ur incurred um to pay for the per it's not an expensive item to pay for per I would rather let the village bring it back when they saw fit to request um following a lean because if she doesn't pay I know they'll be BR back for us may I ask apprach if you absolutely that's that sounds fine we can keep following up with her to remind her to make the payments if if not then we'll decide in maybe a couple months three months to bring it back for intent toine if she doesn't pay I I believe she will right because has made the effort whole store right so we could bring it all back at the same time right right right well then we take no action this evening exactly so then your motion would be motion would be we take no action bring it back in October for an update I'll second that all in favor I motion passes 5 we have finished with old business and moving on to new business first case and new business is case number 8 well item number 8.1 for 701 noreast 109th Street for case number 24501 uh this case was for a dumpster permit that wasn't obtained um on a construction site they have come into compliance as of this afternoon they have paid for they have obtained the permit I'm really GL to hear that cuz quite honestly I couldn't find the dumpster in any of the pictures I had isn't there's no dumpster the construction debris is here no dumpster so the violation was for not having a dumpster not correct not okay it says construction dumpster in the front yard oh you're right where's the picture for the dumpster we should have had a picture for it's a picture wasn't in the documentation though no the the debris The debris field in front of the house is in the picture right but the all right I will okay I apologize give us a minute okay they paid for a permit do you have it in system if the if the dumpster has been the permits been um obtained that's correct the per the permit was just obtained this afternoon and I believe the property owner is here would you like to come to the podium hello hi everyone if you would is that mic working now because it wasn't in commission meeting what hello hello hello that works yeah well if you would identify yourself and your relationship property my name is Austina I live right right across uh the street I'm the sister of the owner of the of the property you live on the opposite side of the Avenue or the street I live in 11 19901 120 street street yes and the was right in the corner so the dump the dumpster permit was paid for because this afternoon now descrition says dumpster in front of correct yard the we didn't have there was for one day we didn't is the first time that we're doing construction I live in the neighbor but I didn't do construction uh so it was there for one day we took the trash out and we didn't know so it's not there anymore but one more case but did anybody like to make a motion on this particular case on case number c-24 4-50 like to make a motion uh to close the case D the permit's been applied for second all in favor I I opposed motion passes 5 Z there's one more case for the same address and same Property Owners this is for we're asking for an order of enforcement on that violation for Windows that were installed without permits however I'm looking at the my notes here they did apply for a permit and the permit is now in review yes we were here the last hearing we were approved they made only just one comment we submitted all the drawings they haven't buil in Department I believe it's in review process by building yes it was approved by pnd exactly okay um yeah it just they're in review but yeah so so the next step is how long does it take for them so it's well on its way to getting the permit ABS the permit will be issued soon it's in review by building it's already passed through p& and it's been approved so a few more days they have paid all right right well if there are no other questions I'd like to make motion on case number c-24 d508 that a violation had occurred it's now in the process of being of having the permit issued and to fine a a fine of 250 and the administrative costs of 250 I second all in favor I I I motion passes 5 Z thank you so much thank you so much it is it is I think it's Millie's old house the next case is 8.3 address is 720 Northeast 117th Street for the case number c-24 d381 property owners icon capital l C in care of the registered agent Jeffrey KH we're asking for an order of enforcement they were found to be in violation of section 8.4.3 one property maintenance this um house needs to be painted is the property owner here property owner is not here but we have been in contact with them and what say they they said they would comply but they haven't I was just say the courtesy notice was in May and the notice of violation was issued in August and August the 8th and as of September the 4th it's still and it's overgrown even further but that's not what we're here for you you didn't get a response from Mr Khan Raphael from that September 12th correspondence as so um as of this morning we have not heard from them we spoke to them on the phone and they aware of all these violations the in the email is the conversation that that are this morning they contacted me and then I reply back to them and that's the copy of the email and then we never heard from them again okay would anybody like are there any further questions from the board would anyone like to make a motion on the first case yeah I'll make I'll make a motion on Cen 24- 381 that a violation has occurred and that we assess a fee of $250 and $250 administrative byly to pull a permit uh this is on the paint so for the next meeting well a permit they're within the it doesn't cost anything and they are they're within the colors in the colors you didn't even go to PNC no I I don't think we should have I should be up to us to have no no but our NE before our next meeting well because actually paint Andor clean so maybe they decide to pressure wash and maybe that brings them in compliance so we could set a tighter deadline because that's one of the things they the options they've been given paint and or clean and maintain exterior W now might I suggest Judy um three weeks which would give them enough time to obtain it and need to paint it and clean it that would be October 9th okay so let's say that they need to come into compliance by October the 9th otherwise is a $250 fine and $250 administrative and $250 violation fine and 250 administrative but if they don't don't under compliance then it's a 250 daily dat correct okay I'll second all in favor I I motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.4 for the same address and same owners this violation is for a fence fence maintenance in violation of section 11. 6.7 ABDC um the fence on the right side of the property facing Northeast 117th Street is um in bad condition is there a pool back there yes yes that's correct oh yes and do we know whether the pool is f those violations are coming after uh the reason we issued this violation is for that very reason there's a swimming pool in the back and we need security okay um yeah if there no questions I'd like to make a motion uh and case number c-24 d383 that a violation has occurred set a fine of $250 plus an administrative cost of $250 uh comply by pulling a permit and getting the fence or rectifying the issue by October the 9th or for a $250 a day fund thereafter second for discussion okay I don't know that that would require a permit just to rep your fence no they can correct that fence without a permit oh um I you wouldn't mind I didn't know if fence needed completely done I just sort of soled no it's it looks like it just needs an adjustment just needs to be adjusted then to comply by how long will it take you to get the notice of violence I mean the out are we still scheduled for Friday yes so I'm going to have an early I'm G have an Friday of this week so they will mailed out mid mid next week am I correct correct okay I'm considering U that this is a safety issue October 9 sounds good well I mean I can Ty I wouldn't mind tighten it up till October absolutely a full a week and a week and a half to come into compliance good idea so it's the same motion but amended to strike the pull permit part correct rectify the sit situation by October the 2nd for $250 day there and I second all in favor I opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.5 for the same address and same owners case number Cen 24- 596 they were found to V violation of section 8.4.3 point1 B C and H Property Maintenance the driveway and walkway uh walkway paved surface has been has is showing signs of discoloration and cracks throughout the entire surface area is any living at this house it's vacant sure looks vacant definitely will require permitting yep yes September the 30th they would need their documentation by week and week and a half yeah could be pushing it yeah October the 14th next is that your motion no I was just giving out the dates I didn't know if anybody had any questions if not I'd make a motion any any other questions from the board dils brought up the suggestion that we give them a deadline of October 14th to get all their paperwork in that would get them on the 21st planning and design Review Board second that there any fines well I haven't made the motion yet but on case number c-24 d596 uh find a violation they're not in compliance a violation has occurred and assess aine of $250 plus a $250 um administrative cost apply for and pull a per apply for pull a permit by October the 14th for assess the F of $250 per day I'll oh I'm sorry Judy second it second it all in favor I any opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.6 same address and same Property Owners they were found to be in violation of section 11. 9.1.3 point5 swimming pools this swimming pool is not screened um by fence and is UN safe any questions okay um I'd like to make a motion in the case of the N24 d652 a violation has occurred assess a $250 fine $250 admin costs compliance date of getting that pool greened in secured whether they put wood over it whatever has to happen to make it secure a deadline of 101 or $250 daily fine I'll second all in favor I opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.7 for the same address and same Property Owners found to be in violation of section 11.9.51 swimming pool is filled with water um I'll say they have had partial compliance they they pumped some of the water out but there's a lot of Mark on the bottom of this swimming pool so I we were not able to give them full compliance on this we are asking for an order of enforcement considering the severity of the violation any question all right I'd like to make a motion on c-24 d653 that a violation has occurred that it's not uh and give assess a fine of $250 administrative cost of 250 comply by date to have the uh pool drained by uh October the 1st if not a $250 dat on second all in favor I oos motion passes 5 Z next I is 8.8 for the same address and same Property Owners we asking for an order of enforcement we have found them in violation of section 8.4.2 e lot maintenance and cleanup this property has provided a breeding ground for mosquitoes because of the swimming pool and has overgrowth over the pool the pool was had so much overgrowth you couldn't see the swimming pool they've moved some of the overgrowth but the rest of the property is still overgrown well it still looks like it's filled with green pea soup I mean it's really bad that's we just roll out this one's basically for the property maintenance okay any question sorry go ahead any questions no okay if not I'd like to make a motion in case number Cen 24- 654 violation has occurred ass say $50 fine 250 administrative costs give a compliance date of 101 to get that all cleaned up or 250 daily a second all in favor I opposed motion passes 5 next item is 8.9 for the property located at 80 5 Northeast 115th Street it's per case number CN 24- 316 for Daniel Lopez this case is now in compliance it was a violation for offense um yeah I saw that was in compliance I was just wondering when did it come in compliance um compliance date oh by the date all right I can get the date for you you give me a second well if it was done by the compliance dat I'd like it was it complied by on case number c n-24 d316 i uh find that the property is uh in compliance and move to close second we have a motion in a second all in favor I I motion passes by Z next item is 8.10 for the same property 805 Northeast 115th Street this is for case number Cen 24- 450 um we were going to ask for an order of enforcement for a driveway surface that has several cracks throughout however they came in today and applied for a permit so they do have a driveway permit and I would like to enter into the record permit number W bws d24 d55 there are no questions do we have a motion I'll make a motion on C 24- 591 since they're in compliance with their permit that we close the case I'll second all in favor I I I motion passes 5 Z the next item is 8.11 this is for the property located at 820 Northeast 118th Street case number CN 24- 591 you tell Omar Romero and betric Gonzales we are asking for an order of enforcement we found them to be in violation of section 18.4 permitted days and hours of construction they were working installing a driveway outside of permitted hours they started at 7:30 in the morning and um disturbing the neighbors we are asking for a $250 penalty for this violation hi everybody second any questions from the board and just remind us the the time that it's supposed to start is what 8 8 in the morning okay would identify yourself and your relationship to the property uh my name is Beatrice I'm the owner of the property sorry my English is not perfect so I'm sorry for that so this is the situation the builders left the material in in my door the day before the violation so the violation day I woke up in the morning very very early and I saw the raining was coming hard so now I called the builders uh asking them to come early to cover the materials the sand and everything because I was scared that all the materials that I pay and cost me a lot would be would be destroyed so they came at 7:30 and they moved the material from one side to the other side so the inspector came and knocked my door and explained to me about the time the start time that I didn't know that I never saw I never saw any information about it so I said say okay that's fine I can stop and that's it I didn't know that it's a special situation because the rain was coming and I was trying to cover the materials so he he told me okay I understand they stop the builders go went to their um cars they was inside their cars waiting for 8 a.m. and minut minutes later I saw the the paper so this is the situation I'm so sorry for that I didn't know that it was an special uh situation this is your case yes yes it is um did you tell me what you observed on the property when you got there was there actual construction work being done was it covering something to protect it from the rain was it raining can kind of fill us in at that particular day I was doing a sweep and I came across that property when I saw that there was a cement truck outside and it was actively uh tumbling I also saw workers there in the driveway putting down a driveway there was concrete and they were smoothing it out it the weather at that time started to was looking murky but it wasn't raining as yet so I told the property owner they need to stop the work and resume it at 8:00 and we stop right and they did stop yeah thank you I I do see on the there is a photo of concrete be important yeah yeah Luciana so you're saying that when you went there that you saw uh the cement truck tumbling and you saw like this looks like a guy's got a hose there there was active concrete work that was being done that is correct yes okay so he's what he's saying is is that he went there and it wasn't just picking up stuff and covering up sand and things so it wouldn't get wet there was actually um concrete being poured meaning that work was being done I don't know anything about like construction or pictures so maybe they was trying to do something uh that they want to do it after that I don't know I really I don't know the only know that the only thing that I know is I expain you was the guy right to knock my door that is correct I told him because he was very kind he explained to me what is happened and I say I didn't know that the rain was coming and this is the only thing that I know but I don't know anything about construction if they if they was doing something not trying to cover trying to doing something early because the rain is coming or whatever I didn't know that I don't know so contractors don't prepare I'm sorry to interrupt you contractors don't prepare concrete to pour when they see that the weather is getting bad they were prepared to work they were prepared to pour that concrete when he arrived at the property and and the picture shows the hose pumping out concrete on one picture and the guys with the shovel trying to to to control the concrete I don't see anything do you know what the worker was 20 days working in my home working at the regular time because I have the the regular permit so for me have not make sense that they work in a irregular time it was an special moment because the Rainy was coming I'm not trying to explain what they was doing but I promised you it was because the raining was coming and they was trying to do something because of that ma'am our our times don't say well if it's going to rain later you can start at 7:30 okay yeah yeah understand got to be fair to everybody hence why enforcement for everybody I do you know what can I say something for the for the future for another people maybe um because you sent us 200 forms to understand everything about the construction well as a matter of fact any constru from here on out part of what property owners will receive is a sign to hang on the property stating what all the hours are stating where trucks can be parked so that going forward is going to be for anything major so what you say is is inside the forms this information it will be part of what you will be given at that time okay I believe it is a part of our forms isn't it a part of is a part of the package that they receive all the instructions and are in there and it's also just common courtesy because before 8:00 a lot of people are still sleeping I understand so concrete truck makes a lot of noise and that's not fair for your neighbors I understand I mean I just wanted to just make an observation because uh you know Mr nibs tell told us what his observations were and um beatric I think that's how introduced yourself uh you know had advised that she instructed them to come and cover things up but then when when when I asked her specifically if they were doing the things that Mr nibs had had observed and what appears to be what is going on in the picture I mean that's and she didn't know I mean I think Mr nibs is you know I don't know if it's testimony or his observations um they're unrebutted in other words that it was going the tumbler was going on and there was concrete being poured so you know that's unfortunately you know you didn't know uh what was being done there so you said you had them come in for one purpose but apparently they were doing another thing when they were there because they were doing more than just covering up um you know covering up materials indicated and my neighborhood are so sweet so I'm sorry for that and he was really really kind so I'm sorry it's the only thing that I can say think we're ready for motion in case number cn24 d591 a violation has occurred assess a $250 fine and close the case I'll second that all in favor I I motion passes 5 Z no right that's no no in this Cas there's not exactly so there there was a fine $250 250 it's it's City Hall no no we're closed now get tomorrow you're welcome thank you next item is 82 for the property located at 835 Northeast 120th Street this is for case number Cen 24679 the property owner is 800 Home realy LLC through their registered agent C I don't want to pronounce your name wrong but this is Alejandro um and the other owner is gamma product worldwide LLC we have found them to be in violation of chapter 16.2 development permits a permit was issued um to install to renovate a property um however a section that was denied by pnz for the kitchen to be installed over a garage was installed after the fact this violation was reported To Us by the building official after he found information online of the property being advertised for sale uh with a kitchen installed over the driveway we're asking for an order of enforcement because this is a repeat offense the first violation was issued Because the actual work that was done in the house was done without permits was started without permits and we are asking for a $500 violation fine and the daily fine of 50 if compliance is not achieved of 500 if compliance is not achieved the documents we the P we just received it shows that it has been the pictures you you you're looking at were pictures that he sent um this afternoon saying that they are in compliance however I cannot confirm this compliance because I'm looking at kitchen cabinets and we have this situations happen in the village of biscane where people come to the board they bring pictures like this as soon as the case is closed they put their appliances back and just go on and we've had that issue with this particular respondent in the p time the same type of offense and you see one of the building officials emails he had this discussion with them last year that's correct this was not a surprise that you don't pull a permit and then go make what you want not a surprise so no and the building officials also very clear everything has to come out all the electric the cabinets everything right other questions so so essentially with with the with the setup over the over the garage it was kind of like a duplex situation is that I'm not sure what that was before however the in that zoning District they cannot have more than one living unit they can have a Grandma's bedroom sort of set up in the back but they cannot have a kitchen it's in a single family zoning district and they cannot have two Kitchens on that property and and was the uh was a kitchen ever applied for there and denied in the first application he applied with a kitchen over the garage planning and design review board was very clear that cannot be done and then submitted a second set of plans without the kitchen those plans were approved however he went back and installed the kitchen per the plans that were denied got it good evening Bor my name is Daniel PUO I'm the owner of gamma products I'm one of the owners not Alejandro cichella he's actually home his wife isn't feeling well um so I want to maybe take a step back I think you guys have these pictures correct okay so we were issued this violation actually on Friday not on Thursday like it's saying I was posted on Friday right I was actually present at the home when they were posted um I'm the owner of many properties in the park as well as Miami Shores and you know we did apply uh for a permit with and I could actually show you guys what was approved was actually a new wet bar area and so we do have the Cabinetry approved um I spoke to Mr gagee uh from the pnz board on Monday he expressed that his main concern was anything that was cooking related uh again I don't oversee my properties I have several of them we have a GC we have PMS on site they did install these items you know we did call them out um as far as being a repeat offense we've never been cited for this uh we were cited for uh demolition without permits we we we cited you for the renov ation that you started in that property major Renovations without permits correct demolition without permits no no that's a different violation you were renovating that property without permits I was there myself I saw it okay but would it be a repeat offense with the kitchen so renovate I can I can I can explain so you were doing construction work at that property without permits that kitchen was installed without permits I can add the right the correct permit but it was installed without a permit you could have applied for a variance because it's outside of the code but you didn't so the main violation is doing work without permits so that particular kitchen that you installed was done without permits this is the first offense it was construction without permits okay not demolition without okay and then uh we did did get approved I did share this with Gage on Monday the the pnz did approve uh stop you for just a second the one who has the final Authority as to what will make compliance is the building official and the building official says very clearly we apologize the the problem with that alarm it keeps going off all non-approved cabinets and appliances together with electrical cables that were not approved so he is saying there's apparently Cabinetry that's not approved either and it's what the building official says is what it will take to Comm in a compli I I would ask that you guys revise the Cabinetry on the we we we will not revise that what you will have to do sir is going and have another meeting with Pedro the building official you will sit down with him and show him or bring him to the property show him what you have constructed and let him see if it matches the plans that was submitted this is not how this works let me just ask a question I just might be just confused the uh the the second floor which has been described as the kitchen had all the apperences of a kitchen you know a stove and all that stuff is is is what you're saying I guess is testimony because you sort to tell the truth at the beginning uh that that this that this stove and and all appliances that are related to a kitchen were put in without your approval they they weren't no not without my approval I don't oversee them so yes they were installed all these things were purchased far far you know back so and then and then and then at some point once they were in I'd assume you probably went up there and looked at it or at least looked at the ad is where where my confusion came is we had several inspections and we actually passed all our final inspections final building inspection received our Co July 29th that was not there when they passed the inspection it was done after the fact I have pictures Well videos Pedro would have said that he reported this when he saw the advertisement he knew what he closed and finaled and it didn't match what he saw on the advertisement that's with the building official also says uh he says I met with building inspectors and revoke the final inspections and approvals oh just understand what you're what you're saying is is that Pedro had done a final inspection on July 30th and provided the co but it didn't have a stove and refrigerator and all other per the Cabinetry because as as as you hear him say he says it was a wet bar if you look at those pictures this is a kitchen with plugs and everything have now been covered sealed to look like that doesn't look like a wet bar to me but however Pedro said this is not what he issued the co4 there was major changes that were made were you there the day that Pedro was going through uh no I was not okay but um I I mean I don't I don't want to throw anyone under the water Pedro's been beyond amazing through this process honestly we had some issues with our first contractor he helped us sort it out a very busy guy and I appreciate time uh you know I thought I sent our electrician the second that we were posted this which was right around 3:15 p.m. on Friday I had it taken care of over the weekend by Monday was not only did we remove them but everything all the electrical and I I'd urge you to come inspected or Pedro or whoever uh has been cut off and then you can see the picture on the electrical panel all the breakers were actually removed and capped off so it is non it is a nonworking uh how about your advertisement did you did you change the advertisement has been completely changed Gage specified we do not want dwellings in detached structures so we change he said can be a gym can be a yoga gym it can be a workshop it can be an office so that was made very clear that's been changed as well we can submitted um the pictures were taken down that you know one of the pictures that showed the previous kitchen the photography was taken weeks ago if not months ago so yeah we're not we're not trying to pull a fast one you know um it's just a little surprise that we've been down this road before right not that long ago now here we are on that road again I'm sorry I I personally haven't I when I became aware of this I actually I live I live in Miami Shores and hopefully I can become a resident of biscan park with one of the other properties that we're getting ready to do so you know I have a question for the Village um building official they um are available Tuesdays and Thursdays yes they are and just so he knows this permit has been reopened the CEO is no longer valid until that's corrected inspected and passed that you cannot have anyone living in that house understood the house is for sale I think it's a gem compared to you know that house has been a blight in the community for 20 years oh I I I I saw the house so I saw the house and I was I I I heard your guys when they were working when they started the work however I just needed you to know the COO is no longer valid um and um the building official has to come out there and do the final inspection I'm aware we've had great traction from you know the community we've got a lot of interest and I don't think I have to say what this house represents in taxes to the community when it sells you know but we're mixing out the LA interest interest here we're not debating the structure or that its value or anything else we're debating workation right I I just want electrical that's where we are I wanted to clarify that you know we came into compliance Within 24 hours of that's or we attempt we're we're you know I'm trying to show how proactive has determined yet I am any questions or are we ready for a motion appreciate that thank you making a motion okay n a c N24 - 679 violation has occurred since this is a second violation assess a $500 fine and if just as a sidebar for a moment if you look at the last order of enforcement we assessed a $500 administrative fee considering all the effort that is now gone into this and this case is certainly not at its conclusion I would like to put forward a $11,000 administr a fee with the property owner until September 30th to come into full compliance or a $500 daily F that gives I'll second that okay for discussion that gives two attempts for the building um uh manager to come in inspect the property corre right well Tuesday and th I mean Tuesday and Thursday good 24th and the 26 26th right I would think he could probably make that okay and the building back has to come and like look at what he's done now and what and what it is like now and issue another Co that's correct I will report this to the building official the outcome of this meeting and the building official will be happy to go there as soon as possible okay and if it's not in complain you given them until September 30th and then $500 daily fund I'll repeat my motion violation has occurred it says a $500 fine a $11,000 administrative fine give the property owner until September 30th to come into complete compliance for a $500 daily F I'll second it again all in favor I opposed motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.1 3 for the property located at 960960 Northeast 121st Street this is for the case number cn- 24453 um for SN Ventures Group Inc in care of their registered agent Sebastian MAA we asking for we were asking for an order of enforcement are they here today the owner you can go to the podium sir we were asking for an order of enforcement for the maintenance of the driveway and the swell area um but from what I understand the property owner is here to present his plans for demolishing that building good evening bear with us J Let Me See board members have any questions I have no questions now that um it he will be submitting plans for demolition building question if you would introduce yourself and your relationship to the property definitely um I'm Sebastian MOA and uh I'm a co-owner of the property so my wife and I own the property you're going to raise the building and build something else there yeah So the plan is to demolish the building and we're going to build um brand new we have the plans uh apparently we met with a new contractor and apparently from what they understand what the code there's some slight changes we need to make so we're just finalizing it's like almost done hopefully um by next month November the latest we should be able to actually present and go through the official channels to open up the permit and then go through you know the entire process yeah the house is empty now the house is completely empty um you know we've tried to fix up as much as we can but the driveway is the lasting so ideally we wouldn't want to pay to do a brand new driveway we're going to demolish it that's um hopefully that's what we can come to a conclusion on and work it out yeah are you planning to submit plans to um I mean for a permit and to go before the uh planning and design board then within 30 days uh 30 leading into November the latest I would say say6 to be fair to give you a little cushion yeah a little cushion because you know we have full-time work you have you'll have to pardon my concern if you drive around our city I'm sure you see numerous projects in various states of limbo so I'm always a little bit leery as to okay you're going to demolish and you've got to plans together and now six or eight months down the road we're still having the same discussion so are you comfortable that within 60 days you will be in the process yes I need to I even have all the plans here here just to show our progress but I don't want to take up time but we should I'd like to give them just I mean to apply for go before p and Z by November the 8th I mainly because that's one starting point three four that's four um um hearings and that's at least a starting a almost two months it's less little shy of two months okay um if I can if I can just add a few thing I'm looking at the calendar for pnz and their their meeting on November the 4th and the 18th right so they have to have oh October the they're meeting October oh but he was just for them to apply not for them to apply they don't apply by November the 8th it's not going to be heard on December 2nd that's correct right okay yes no it's November 5th for December 2nd yes November the 8th for November the 18 yeah so apply by right any any questions any objections that your motion I'm sorry yeah I'd like to make a motion on case number c-24 that 453 um get the property owner until November the 8th to apply for a permit and to be heard before the p in planning and design committee if not uh a $250 per day fine thereafter and administrative cost of 250 but you're saying only if he doesn't only if he doesn't enough time I I hope so that's what we're gonna do well you can always come back come back okay we need to give you this kind of sense of urgency to get process appreciate the process can always come back and ask okay that makes sense thank you has to apply for um a permit and to be heard by November the 8th okay if not a $250 per date F thereafter and a administrative cost f i 2 a second all in favor I any opposed motion passes 5 Z thank you Jane is second no Michael next item is item 8.14 8.14 for the address 1141 Northeast 8th Court this is for case number cn24 d122 uh property appraiser information is protected we are asking for an order of enforcement uh we have found them to be in violation of section 8.4 4.5d they have put storm shatters and protective window covers um over the windows um which is um not allowed per quote we had been in contact with the property owner he asked for a continuance we asked him to put him put it in writing but he said he had no access to a computer we were anticipating two witnesses who are his neighbors to come forward to speak again against him however because of the inclement weather they have not been able to come I apologize for the you can go to the podium I'm so sorry something oh she's quiet I apologize for that any questions from the board no no if you would introduce yourself surely my name is Penny seberg and I live at 11339 Northeast 8th Court this gentleman has been our neighbor for many many years we've been in our house more than 50 years and we have had many many complaints with code enforcement and nothing has been done the pieces of plywood that are on the bedroom windows which face our house have been there probably more than 25 years the boards are rotten wood the roof above it is falling apart that he does have the lawn cut but they only cut the front yard they can't get to the side they can't get to the back there's a car in the backyard that's been there 20 plus years there is so much overgrowth he has trees growing out of his roof nobody's living there right no he's he's living there he's living there yes he is except when we knock on the door he doesn't answer he disabled should someone the only thing that we were told many years ago was that he worked for the Miami Beach police department whether that was true or not I don't know well it might be because his um name his information is withheld why very possible but the place is a disgrace I'm trying to imagine where this is you're on the north side of that eighth court right and 1013 on the east side the east side and then and then uh but on the north side of that eighth court right the eth Court's got 113th going through it right no 100 and um what we're close to 115 115th you're close to 115 okay 115th and 113th and we're right here okay I'm trying to imagine this house can you even see it from the road can you see sure oh this house okay I didn't have the front view it's like second end third end I think uhuh second second end and everything is overgrown things of are just he has a separate Garage in the back and everything you you can barely see the garage because there's so much overgrowth and all of that stuff is growing over our yard my husband tries to keep it trimmed it's really getting out of hand everything is just growing especially now with all the with the weather I know Mr Mr nibs can can he comes by and takes a look every couple weeks apologize for interrupting a second is it to the point yet where perhaps The Village needs to look into doing something because that's a health hazard if it is that bad which just what we're seeing but can you next if the backyard is completely out of control we're talking verman to this one the two vans in the front you got vans in three vans right do they move they stay in do they drive them just one drives one y but I'm concerned the witness testimony is very important in making a determination on how the city can move forward we have never seen the back we've seen the front and we've taken pictures from the side you say there's a tree growing in his roof yep there lots of trees growing out of his roof now we're talking you know and actually imagine it not be leaking because the wood on on the side the fascia it's all rotten it's falling down yeah that's visible in one of the photos we have and we've had trouble with r I think they're living thereis that yeah and fortunately we are not able to see this from the from the street but your W witness testimony is really important for as to to determine how we can move forward okay and your and your house is on the north side of it or the South side of it north of him you're on the North side same side of the road north and your it grows over into your yard and you can see in the back and you can see all that yep okay there are no further questions I think we're ready for a motion and and the and the homeowner was notified to be here today right he was notified we spoke with him and listening to testimony I understand why there was so much push back I asked him to put it in writing that he was asking for more time but he pushed back he he he had no email address I need to use the facts he he pushed back really hard pushed back on what and providing written notice in in providing um something in writing to say he needed more time to clean up the property I wish 25 years isn't enough okay thank you thank you I may have a motion in c24 d122 a violation has occurred assess a $250 fine $250 admin fee give a compliance gate of October one or $250 daily on second all in favor I I motion passes 5 Z next case is for the same address and the same owner it's case number c-24 d156 and we have found them in violation of section 8.47 B lot maintenance and clean up excessive and and unattended overgrowth brush branches and other overgrowth in the re of the property neighbor and um testimony of the village and it's obvious that it's overgrown excessive overgrown beats and brush um and I would have liked to have seen something come before us with regards to the structure of the house or the roof but um maybe that'll be in the future but if there no questions I'd like to go ahead and make a motion yes please in case number c-24 d156 that a violation property is in violation of excessive uh undergrowth and weeds and brush on the property in the rear and sides and assess a fine of $250 plus a administrative cost of 200 come into compliance 250 I mean 250 is that what I said 250 and comply by October the first if not a $250 per day therea I'll second all in favor iOS motion passes 5 Z the next item is 8.16 for the address 11520 noreast 8th Avenue case number c-24 d322 for Neil Allan Tyler and Joan Tyler we asking or we were going to ask for an over order of enforcement however they have removed the vehicle and they are now in compliance right they removed the vehicle when oh they have registered the vehicle I apologize for that mixup they have now registered the vehicle um do you know when so this when did they register I was just know photograph is from today September 13th is when we found I make a motion because I do see there was a courtesy notice and then a notice of violation and we're here today and they um just done it on case number c-24 d322 I'd like to um make a motion that a violation had occurred has been rectified they now in compliance but assess A administrative cost of $250 second all in favor I I motion passes 5 Z next item is 8.17 8.17 and it's for the address 11636 Northeast 7th Avenue case number c-24 d62 three for the property owners P RB P LLC in care of their registered agent rodon Law LLC this case is now in compliance they applied for a permit today and I would like to enter onto the record permit number dm-24 d17 or the 16th they applied for the permit on the 16th yesterday two days ago with the compliance date of August 19th do I have a motion I can make a motion um on c 24623 a violation has occurred and to assess a $250 fine and a $250 administrative fine as they are in compliance now well the last time we just did they came in compliance you just a 250 fine only not administrative but what would be the difference here I mean I can see 250 fine I mean you know but I don't know about it about the admin I mean at least okay I can amend it that's what people feel I was going to say I agree with Mike because the uh our first case under new business um we just assessed the um admin all right cost $250 administrative cost second all in favor I I'm sorry second is once the Fin's paid to close the case is normally how we phrase that we should have thought to say that [Music] wow that's it those were all the cases we brought before the board tonight minutes quick discussion has everybody had chance to read the um August minutes yes yes personally I thought they were very good I did too okay and I was going to move to um approve the minutes Vanessa it is not Vanessa on fire yes she is I'll second that good job I'll second it very proud all in favor of Vanessa being on fire say I I passes 5 okay so minutes approved I'm sorry who made the motion made the motion Judy seconded Miss in favor I okay quick discussion October's meeting is 16th of October you would remember I will be out of town I was going to ask for abs I am too actually Michael at my 40th high school reunion in New Hampshire so I got to go I really definitely want to change the meeting if we can because essentially I'm I'm sorry and I am saying this publicly I cannot get any answer as to our so-called alternate Ashlin if you're in if you're listening we'd like to have you here so can't count on that alternate if God forbid one of the three of us get sick with the two of you out no we got to try to move let see what we got because that almost happened if you guys remember yeah oh we sat here that almost happened beg people to be patient waiting for ralo to get here well I am I will be out of the state from October the 11th through the 21st the 21st I'm actually leaving on the 16th so 16 17 18 I'll be out be back I would how would October 23rd work for staff and for members I think I can do that I mean we're not married to a Wednesday it doesn't have to be but I just went forward we have the meeting is the is H thank you I need to C you're right I need to and see if there's something else up catch unfortunately October 23rd third may not work very well because the next meeting would be the November the 6th we only have a week in between to prepare 6 was that early we have a lot of lot of cases that we could uh put them all till November the 6 ha um we could do that we could combine October with November okay how about two meetings in November although it gets close to Thanksgiving right problem and you're leaving on you I'm sorry D you're leaving the 11th 11th through the 21st Thanksgiving is November [Music] 28 Judy you said you were out the week of the six the fourth I'm gonna be gone the fourth until the um the 13th I think it is November October October so and I'm sorry jul you're gone from window October 4th to the 13th why don't we just roll everything to the November if there if there's enough there's not enough where it's going to be overwhelming we could do that we could roll those cases it will be a bigger agenda and we could roll the cases over to November okay I like that idea okay yeah because if we have we don't have enough time for next I mean first week of October that's the problem if we move it too late in October it gives them no turnaround time and just because you know how I am about Optics I don't want anyone thinking we just didn't bother to have an October meeting I'd like to see November's publicized as combined October November meeting because in fact we are doubling up and I I just want the public to realize that that we're not just flapping things off but yeah I feel much better about that because knowing for sure two of you would be gone God forbid somebody's stucking traffic or whatever so um g g given that our alternate hasn't um shown for any hasn't been present at all to come us find out interested and then how do we get the notify the commission make a recation repl the commission appointed themselves leison to the different boards and um Jonathan is ours and I've talked to him about that I'm going to have to give him give him a call back is he's supposed to look into it you know I'm not looking to be rude if the gentleman really wants to be involved you know we welcome him and we invite him to the November meeting to see where he stands is it alternate supposed to come to the meetings should have been coming to the meetings it shouldn't be a problem if this is something you really want to do you would show up anywhere I was an alternate for years but it's not required nowhere in the ordinance does it require of the alternate to be there which basically the alternate useless because you need to learn I mean it took me months to feel comfortable to even make a motion I did impart it to Jonathan and I will follow up with Jonathan to see where we are um one of things I know we had uh there was a a home on griffing that that um the they come before us because they had installed a fence basically Gates on on gripping and and and somewhat of a corner lock and they removed it before just prior to it coming before us I notice the F there's a gate there now variance they went through a variance there was a variance that's why I want to know if a variance was applied it was approved okay that little corner that little yeah yeah yeah I mean it looks nice I just wanted to know if it was yeah they partially approved it for Griffin but they didn't approve for 111 street right it is a there's a lot of backstory that's fine I mean I just as long as it was variance if that's what so be it and the the the property that they're building the new house on that was abandoned for a long period of time that's where they're doing the new drain system you know I'm talking about next to uh Ross's place that they sold oh yeah yeah yeah I heard of that did they stop that at for some time be huh is that David Kell's old house no his is the vacant lot next it's it's just the one North and was there some issue with that they built too close to the water at some point and