##VIDEO ID:LTC38b5qjFc## .  GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THIS MEETING AUGUST 29TH MEETING OF THE BLOOMINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION.  THE COMMISSION IS MADE UP OF SEVEN MEMBERS. WE HAVE FOUR PRESENT THIS EVENING.  EACH MEMBER VOLUNTEERS THEIR TIME AND IS A BLOOMINGTON RESIDENT.  MEMBERS ARE APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.  THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS IS ADVISORY TO THE CITY FOR MOST ITEMS THE COMMISSION MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE CITY COUNCIL HAS FINAL DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY. THERE ARE CERTAIN APPLICATIONS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION CAN APPROVE OR DENY ON ITS OWN SUBJECT TO THE APPEAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR EACH ITEM THERE WILL BE A STAFF REPORT THEN A CHANCE THE APPLICANT TO PRESENT THEN A CHANCE FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TESTIMONY. WE LIMIT EACH PERSON'S TIME TO 3 MINUTES BUT THERE WILL BE A AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO FURTHER.  YOU NEED TO FOR A SECOND ROUND AND THEN THE COMMISSION WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSS THE ITEM BEFORE THE ACTION IS TAKEN OUR ORDER OF BUSINESS TONIGHT IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEASE STAND IF YOU'RE ABLE PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.  ALL RIGHT, FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS PLANNING MANAGER MARK PICARD. WE HAVE A PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE SCHEDULE. WOULD YOU PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE?  YES. CHAIR ALBRECHT COMMISSIONERS, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT WE WILL RUN INTO A QUORUM CONCERN AT APPROXIMATELY 7:00 THIS EVENING A MEMBER NEEDS TO DEPART THAT TIME. SO GIVEN THE QUORUM ISSUE I WOULD RECOMMEND CHANGING THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA SPECIFICALLY RATHER SPECIFICALLY STARTING WITH ITEM FOUR, THEN ITEM THREE, THEN ITEM TWO AND THEN ITEM ONE AND THEN GOING ON TO ITEMS FIVE AND SIX THAT WOULD THE PURPOSE OF THAT WOULD TO ALLOW US TO MAXIMIZE HOW MANY ITEMS WE CAN COMPLETE BEFORE WE LOSE THE QUORUM TONIGHT AND PLANNING MANAGER MARK PICARD DOES THAT REQUIRE A MOTION CHAIR?  THAT'S CORRECT. IT WOULD REQUIRE A MOTION A MAJORITY IN FAVOR.  SO I'M LOOKING FOR A MOTION. MADAM CHAIR, I MOVED TO REORDER THE AGENDA AS PROPOSED . SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION.  A SECOND ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION?  ALL THOSE IN FAVOR I I I ANY OPPOSED THAT MOTION PASSES FOR . ALL RIGHT. GIVEN THE CHANGE IN THE AGENDA WE ARE LOOKING AT ITEM FOUR TO BEGIN TONIGHT'S MEETING. ITEM IS A MAJOR REVISION TO THE FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR AN TO AN EXISTING WAREHOUSE. PLANNER ODAY YOU HAVE THE STAFF REPORT. I DO. THANK YOU. CAN YOU HEAR ME? THERE YOU GO.  SO YES, ITEM FOUR SCHEDULED TO ITEM ONE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA IS FOR A FINAL TIME BUILDING PLAN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING ADDITION. SUBJECT ADDRESS 1900 WEST 96TH STREET JUST NORTH OF CITY HALL ON 96TH STREET. SURROUNDING LAND USES ARE INDUSTRIAL KIND OF OFFICE WAREHOUSE RELATED USES.  SO WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IS A THREE PHASE KIND OF BUILDING RENOVATION AND SITE RENOVATION . THE FIRST PHASE IS AN INTERIOR RENOVATION OF THE BUILDING THAT'S ALREADY BEEN PERMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND THE SECOND PHASE IS A EXTERIOR FACADE MODIFICATION WITH THE VESTIBULE ADDITION. THAT'S CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW UNDER KIND OF INTERNAL STAFF REVIEW.  AND THEN THE THIRD PHASE WHICH IS THE BUILDING ADDITION WHICH IS 4500 SQUARE FEET WAREHOUSE ADDITION OFF THE BACK OF THE BUILDING OUTLINED IN RED ON THE SCREEN.  THIS COMPRISES ABOUT 24.7% INCREASE IN ADDITIONAL FLOOR AREA AND THEN P.S. THIS DOES REQUIRE PC APPROVAL BECAUSE IT IS MORE THAN PERCENT SO THERE ARE A COUPLE BUILDING.  THE TOP IMAGE IS SHOWING THE EAST ELEVATION KIND OF SHOWING THE CHANGE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND THEN THE ADDITION THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE IMAGE THERE SHOWING FOR ADDITIONAL DOCK DOORS, BUILDING MATERIALS INCLUDE PRECAST STONE AND STUCCO AND THEN THE EXISTING BUILDING WOULD BE METAL PANELS AND FS .  SO AT THAT PRETTY SHORT AND SWEET PRESENTATION FOR YOU TONIGHT.  THIS IS A FINAL DECISION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION SUBJECT TO APPEAL TO ACCOUNT FOR THE LABOR DAY HOLIDAY. SO THE APPEAL PERIOD ENDS ON SEPTEMBER 4TH AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE.  PERSON SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?  SEEING NONE. WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM  IF YOU COULD JUST INTRODUCE YOURSELF THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL.  THANK YOU. COMMISSION MY NAME'S CHAD HALLORAN WITH 10-K.  I'M THE PROJECT ARCHITECT. THE OWNER IS ON HIS WAY AND UNFORTUNATELY HE COULDN'T. HE'S NOT HERE IN TIME WITH THE BUT I'LL JUST SAY THAT THE APPLICANT IS QUALITY INSULATION WHO'S A SMALL BUSINESS THEY DO COMMERCIAL INSULATION FOR MOSTLY MULTIFAMILY AND OTHER COMMERCIAL PROJECTS.  THE EXPANSION ITSELF WE'VE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH STAFF THROUGH THAT PROCESS WE'RE PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ISLANDS, SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARKING AS WELL AS ADDRESSING STORMWATER RETENTION. SO I THINK WE'RE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO MEET THE CITY'S REQUIREMENTS, HOPE THAT THE COMMISSION CAN SEE IT THAT WAY AS WELL. THANK YOU MR..  QUESTIONS FOR MR. HALLER COMMISSIONER COOK THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. MR. HELLER IS THIS A BUSINESS THAT'S CURRENTLY LOCATED IN BLOOMINGTON OR ARE YOU MOVING HERE? THEY'RE ACTUALLY LOCATED SAINT LOUIS PARK CURRENTLY AND RELOCATING TO BLOOMINGTON. TERRIFIC. THANK.  ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS?  THANK YOU, MR. HELLER. IT IT. THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO.  WE WILL OFFICIALLY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ANYONE IS INTERESTED IN TESTIFYING MAY COME UP AND SIGN IN AND PROVIDE ANY TESTIMONY. PLANNING MANAGER MARKET GUIDE IS THERE ANYONE ON LINE CHAIR ALBRECHT WE HAVE NO ONE ON LINE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT, JUST GIVE IT A SECOND. YOU SEE, ONE WANTS TO TESTIFY . ALL RIGHT?  LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SO SIR, WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND A SECOND ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I, I OPPOSED SAY NAY. THAT MOTION PASSES FOR ZERO. ALL RIGHT. DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM.  THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. REVIEWING THE STAFF REPORT AND THE YOU KNOW IT'S MEETING EVERY REQUIREMENT OUTLINED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT. I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS OF APPROVING THIS ITEM.  COMMISSIONER, YOU THINK, CHAIR YEAH, I AGREE. IT SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.  I WILL ADD MY $0.02 AS WELL SEEMS FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD. THANK YOU FOR THE APPLICATION AND EXCITED TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL BUSINESS HERE IN BLOOMINGTON WITH FACTS DO WE HAVE A MOTION COMMISSIONER CURRY THANK YOU CHAIR HAVING TO HAVING BEEN ABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS I MOVE TO APPROVE MAJOR REVISION TO FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR AN ADDITION ONTO AN EXISTING WAREHOUSE BUILDING SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT.  SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION AND A FOR THE FOR THE MOTION ON THE SCREEN ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I ALL THOSE OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES FOR ZERO. THAT IS A FINAL DECISION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS AN APPEAL IS RECEIVED OR APPEAL REQUEST IS RECEIVED BY 4:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 4TH. ALL RIGHT. WE ARE GOING TO MOVE TO OUR SECOND ITEM WHICH IS ACTUALLY ITEM THREE ON YOUR AGENDA. THAT IS REZONING AND WE ARE LOOKING FOR STAFF REPORT PLANNER HAS SUSPECT OF THE STAFF REPORT. GOOD EVENING. YES SO I HAVE ITEM 3/2 WHICH IS REZONING THE SOUTH APARTMENTS.  SO THIS SCREENSHOT SHOWS THE FOUR PROPERTIES ON ARE PROPOSED TO BE REZONE FROM OUR FOUR TO OUR M 24.  THERE IS THE REASON THAT THE APPLICANT IS WANTING TO GO THROUGH THIS REZONING IS BECAUSE THERE'S A POTENTIAL THE FUTURE TO ADD ADDITIONAL APARTMENT UNITS WITHIN THE BUILDING BUT THAT IS NOT BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IT'S JUST THE REZONING TO ALLOW FOR HIGHER DENSITIES SO SURROUNDING THESE APARTMENT BUILDINGS ARE SOME SINGLE FAMILY USES OFFICE SOME ALSO MULTIPLE FAMILY USES AND THEN SMITH PARK TO THE WEST THESE PROPERTIES ARE GUIDED HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WHICH CALLS FOR A 10 TO 150 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WHICH THESE PROPERTIES FALL WITHIN.  SO JUST I GUESS A QUICK OVERVIEW FOR UNIT NUMBERS AND TOTAL THERE ARE 244 APARTMENT UNITS BETWEEN THESE FOUR BUILDINGS.  HERE IS A TABLE SHOWING SOME THE STANDARDS FOR THE ARM 24 ZONING DISTRICT. EVERYTHING ON THIS LIST IS CONFORMING THOSE STANDARDS THE DENSITY RANGES ARE IMPORTANT BECAUSE EVEN ADDING POTENTIAL UNITS WOULD KEEP THEM IN THIS RANGE BUT ACTUALLY IN THE EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT THAT THEY'RE IN AND ARE FOR THEY'RE OUT OF THE ARE FOR DENSITY RANGE. SO THIS WOULD BRING THEM MORE COMPLIANCE.  HERE ARE SOME MORE STANDARDS ALL STRUCTURE SETBACKS ARE MET THE FOUR AREA RATIO IS MET AND THEY REALLY HAVE ABUNDANT OPEN SPACE AND THOSE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET .  I PUT THIS ON HERE. WELL FIRST OF ALL, THE PARKING STRUCTURE SETBACKS ARE ALSO FOR THIS BUT THEN THIS TABLE ALSO SHOWS THE REQUIREMENT FOR PARKING WHICH IS ACTUALLY BASED ON THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF UNITS NOT THE ZONING DISTRICT.  SO THIS IS MORE FOR INFORMATION BUT THE PROPERTIES ARE BELOW THE CODE REQUIRED PARKING SPACE A NUMBER BUT THERE'S NO CHANGE IN UNIT THAT'S BEING PROPOSED RIGHT NOW SO PARKING ACTUALLY B AFFECTED.  IT'S MORE TO SHOW KIND OF IN THE FUTURE WHERE THEY WOULD NEED TO GO BUT THIS IS NOT SPECIFIC TO THE ZONING DISTRICT. IT'S MORE TO THE MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING USE AND SO WITH THAT STAFF THINKS THAT THE SOUTH GAY APARTMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE 24 DISTRICT INTENT AND STANDARDS AND THAT ADDITIONAL UNITS ON THE SITE IN THE FUTURE IS CONSISTENT WITH GUIDANCE.  THE BLOOMINGTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WE HAVE WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. I HAVE THAT ON THE NEXT SLIDE. THE QUESTIONS ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER COOKED IT IT'S BEEN I'M SURE MISSPOKE FOR THE PEOPLE WATCHING AT HOME. CAN YOU DESCRIBE WHAT THE 24 IN ALM 24 MEANS? YEAH CHAIR COMMISSIONER CLIFTON THAT HAS DO WITH ON THIS SLIDE THE ARM 24 THAT'S YOU WITH THE DENSITY RANGE SO IT GOES UP TO 24 UNITS PER ACRE COMMISSIONER THIS HAS BACK WITH THE FUTURE ADDED DENSITY POTENTIAL AT A DENSITY WOULD DEDICATION FEES STILL APPLY TO THE NEW UNITS OR WOULD IT BE GRANDFATHERED IN AND NOT NEEDED? CHAIR A COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I THINK WOULD STILL BE NEEDED BUT I WILL HAVE GLEN ANSWER THAT. YEAH.  CHAIR ALBRECHT COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM IN BLOOMINGTON PARK DEDICATION IS TREATED ONLY WITH PLANNING SO IF PRE-PLANNING DID OCCUR FOR SOME REASON THAT WOULD TRIGGER A PARK DEDICATION ON THOSE NEWER UNITS. BUT IF THERE'S NO REPLANTING THERE WOULD NOT BE PARK DEDICATION.  THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER KIRBY THANK CHAIR JUST IN THE CONFORMITY TABLE I GUESS MAYBE I MIGHT HAVE MISSED IT BUT IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT BETWEEN THE CURRENT ZONING AND THE PROPOSED ZONING CHAIR COMMISSIONER CURRY SO BUILDING HEIGHT IS ACTUALLY BASED ON A HEIGHTS MAP THAT WE HAVE SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT BUT YEAH GLEN I DON'T KNOW IF YOU A BETTER ANSWER TO THAT YEAH. COMMISSIONER ALBRIGHT COMMISSIONER CURRY CORRECT.  NO IMPACT AND WITH THE REZONING THE HEIGHT LIMITS WOULD REMAIN AS THEY ARE TODAY. THANK YOU.  ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?  ALL RIGHT WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?  COME UP AND INTRODUCE YOURSELF PLEASE.  I REMEMBER WHEN MY NAME IS FRANK FRENCH. I'M THE PRESIDENT OF MID-CONTINENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION.  WE MANAGE SOUTH GATE APARTMENTS AND OUR INTEREST BRINGING ADDITIONAL HOUSING STOCK TO THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON AND SOME PREEXISTING UNDERUTILIZED.  SO OUR GOAL IS TO ADD ADDITIONAL THREE BEDROOM UNITS TO THE HOUSING STOCK HERE FOR THE FAMILIES IN THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON.  AND WE FEEL THAT THIS IS AN IDEAL SCENARIO AND THE FACT THAT THIS IS ALREADY AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, PREEXISTING SPACE UNDERUTILIZED.  THANK YOU, MR. FRENCH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT I HAVE ONE QUESTION BASED ON WHAT YOU SAID YOU WOULD NOT BE INCREASING THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE PARCEL IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. THANK.  ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?  THANK YOU. THANK YOU.  THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING SO I WILL OFFICIALLY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO TESTIFY THEY CAN COME UP AND INTRODUCE THEMSELVES.  PLANNING MANAGER MARK AAGAARD IS THERE ANYONE ON LINE?  ALL RIGHT. NO ONE ON THE LINE FOR THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL GIVE IT A SECOND. YOU WANT US TO TESTIFY?  ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE I WILL ENTERTAIN EMOTION. I'M SURE I MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, THERE IS A MOTION CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND A SECOND ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION?  ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I OPPOSED THAT MOTION FOUR ZERO. ALL RIGHT.  WE WILL MOVE TO THE COMMISSION DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER COOKED . THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. THIS CERTAINLY IS IN LINE WITH OUR HOUSING FOR THE CITY OF NATURALLY A NATURALLY OCCURRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND IT'S GREAT TO SEE REINVESTMENT IN OUR EXISTING PROPERTIES.  I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS COMMITTEE . COMMISSIONER CURRY THANK CHAIR YEAH I AGREE IDEA MAKES SENSE TO ME ALL RIGHT. AND I WOULD AGREE THAT I THINK PARTICULARLY IN THE LOCATION THAT IS THAT WITH THE PARK AMENITIES IT IS A GREAT SPOT TO LIVE SO THAT IS WILL BE A BENEFIT TO THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON.  ALL RIGHT. IF ANYONE IS WILLING TO MAKE A MOTION.  COMMISSIONER GUPTA THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. I MOVE TO RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP.  THERESA ON THE LOTS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT FROM OUR FOR TO OUR M24 MULTI MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SECOND ALL RIGHT THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION.  ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSE SAY NAY MOTION PASSES FOR ZERO.  ALL RIGHT THAT IS THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE SEPTEMBER 30TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING.  RIGHT NEXT ITEM WHICH IS ITEM TWO ON YOUR BUT WILL BE ITEM THREE FOR US IS IS A FIVE YEAR INTERIM USE PERMIT AND COMMISSIONER CAPTAIN HAS SOMETHING HE WOULD LIKE TO ADD . MADAM CHAIR THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED TO JUST STATE FOR THE MINUTES THAT I AM EMPLOYED BY THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION WHO OWNS AND OPERATES AIRPORTS.  HOWEVER, MY ROLE AT THE MCC DOES NOT INTERFACE PARKING OR THE OPERATIONS OF PARKING AND SO AFTER CONSIDERATION I DO NOT FEEL I HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON THIS ITEM. THANK YOU FOR CANDOR.  THAT THAT'S GREAT. ALL RIGHT SO WE ARE LOOKING FOR A STAFF REPORT PLANNING SUPERVISOR CENTENARIO YOU HAVE THE STAFF REPORT LIGATURE.  GOOD EVENING PLANNING COMMISSION SO WE HAVE NEXT ON THE AGENDA A REQUEST FOR A FIVE YEAR INNER MUSE PERMIT.  A COUPLE OF OUR COMMISSIONERS ARE PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE THE PARKING GO REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING FACILITY AT LEAST THAT'S HOW WHAT WE CALL IN THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON A REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING AND SO PARKING GO LOCATED ON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE IN IN THE CITY SOUTH LOOP DISTRICT IT'S ABOUT TWO ONE HALF ACRES AND YOU CAN SEE IT ON THE SCREEN AS BOUND BY INTERNATIONAL DRIVE TO THE WEST INTERSTATE 494 TO THE NORTH, 34TH AVENUE TO THE EAST AND THEN AMERICAN EAST TO THE SOUTH. SO OBVIOUSLY THIS IS RIGHT ALONG THE BLUE LRT AND HAS THERE'S A THE SOUTHBOUND STOP JUST YOU KNOW ALONG 34TH AVENUE. SO THE IN TERMS OF THE SITE THERE THERE IS A SMALL BUILDING ON SITE MANAGEMENT BUILDING WITH ABOUT 1300 PARKING SPACES.  THE REQUEST IS FOR A FIVE YEAR IP OR OR AN EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING IP AND THAT WOULD BRING THE INTERVIEWS PERMIT FOR REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING TO OCTOBER OF 2029. SO IT WAS I COULDN'T FIND AERIAL IMAGERY FROM THE NINETIES THERE WAS THE EIGHTIES AND THEN THERE WAS 23 . SO YOU HAVE AN IMAGE HERE FROM 2003 SO OVER 20 YEARS AGO AND YOU CAN SEE PARKING PRETTY MUCH OPERATING EXACTLY HOW IT IS TODAY SAME PARKING LOT ROUGHLY THE SAME CAPACITY AND IT'S BEEN OPERATING IN A SIMILAR CAPACITY FOR OVER 30 YEARS AND SO THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL FOR IT WAS FOR A TEMPORARY USE IN 1991. THE WHOLE IDEA WAS REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING AS A IT WAS A HOLDING USE AWAITING PERMANENT DEVELOPMENT. SO THERE WAS NEVER REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING IT WAS NEVER CONSIDERED A PERMANENT LAND USE.  THAT SAID, IT'S BEEN THE INTERVIEWS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN EXTENDED MULTIPLE TIMES OVER THE LAST 30 PLUS YEARS AND WE ARE NOT RECOMMENDING THAT THEY CONTINUE THAT THIS INTERIM USE PERMIT CONTINUED TO BE EXTENDED.  SO I WANT TO TOUCH ON A LITTLE BIT ON THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT THIS THAT THE PARKING GO SITE 79 ON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE PRESENTS THIS IS A GRAPHIC FROM OUR SOUTH LOOP DISTRICT PLAN AND WHEN WE'RE EVALUATING DEVELOPER PROPOSALS WE GO TO THE OF COURSE THE CITY CODE BUT THEN WE ALSO LOOK FOR GUIDANCE FROM THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE SOUTH OF DISTRICT PLAN AND SO THIS SITE IN PARTICULAR REALLY HAS BLOOMINGTON'S BEST TRANSIT SERVICE.  NOT ONLY IS IT IS IT ACCESSIBLE TO BUS SERVICE BUT IT GET IT IS QUITE LITERALLY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AN LRT STATION IT ALSO IS 12 AND A HALF OF CONTIGUOUS ACRES, DEVELOPABLE ACRES IS EXTREMELY RARE IN A MOSTLY BUILT OUT COMMUNITY. AND SO WHEN WE LOOK AT THE SOUTH OF DISTRICT PLAN VISION FOR THE SITE IT IS IT IS EXPLICITLY FOR HIGH DENSITY MIXED USE AND INTENSE USES. SO PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED, TRANSIT ORIENTED AND VERY INTENSE FRANKLY THE OPPOSITE OF REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING.  SO I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH EACH ITEM, EACH BULLET POINT. I JUST WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT A COUPLE BITS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO IF YOU LOOK TO THIRD BULLET POINT PAGE 2.2, ONE OF THE STRATEGIES THAT HAS BEEN ADOPTED BY THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS TO SUPPORT HIGHER USE INTENSITIES AND MIXED USE IN AREAS CURRENTLY ARE PROPOSED TO BE WELL SERVED BY TRANSIT WELL THIS IS THE SITE IS EXTREMELY WELL SERVED BY TRANSIT BUT IT HAS A VERY FROM A LAND USE PERSPECTIVE IT IS NOT AN INTENSE OR AN IS NOT MIXED USE AND ANOTHER ITEM I WANT TO CALL OUT IS ON PAGE 2.4 THE FOURTH BULLET CITY'S ADAPTIVE STRATEGY TO PROMOTE ADDITIONAL HIGH INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT ALONG I-4 94 CORRIDOR ESPECIALLY WITHIN THE CITY'S THREE PRIMARY GROWTH NODE SOUTH LOOP PAN-AMERICAN INTERMODAL AND OF COURSE THE PARK AND GO SITE IS WITHIN THE SOUTH OF DISTRICT PLAN SO ARE SOUTH LOOP DISTRICT.  SO FROM A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERSPECTIVE PERMANENT REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING OR CONTINUATION OF REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING WOULD BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDANCE THAT WE SEE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEN WE GO TO THE SOUTH OF DISTRICT PLAN WHICH KIND OF DELVES DEEPER INTO THE SOUTH OF DISTRICT SPECIFICALLY WE HAVE ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK AND GUIDANCE THAT DOES GET QUITE EXPLICIT AND IF YOU GO TO THE FIFTH BULLET AND PAGE 3.31 IT CALLS OUT THE INNER LAND USES MEANING REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING AS A KEY OPPORTUNITY AND THAT IT STATES THAT IT OCCUPIES TWO THIRDS OF THE DEVELOPABLE AREA WITHIN THE SOUTH OF DISTRICTS AND UNDER UNDERDEVELOPED LAND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AN LRT STATION REPRESENTS AN EXCELLENT OPPORTUNITY FOR NEW TIDIER ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT.  SO AGAIN THIS SITE PROVIDES A TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR GROWTH WITHIN CITY AND IT IS THAT'S WHAT THE CITY PLANS FOR NOW IN THE STAFF REPORT WE OUTLINED YOU KNOW THE SOME OF THE I GUESS ENDEAVORS OR THINGS THAT THE CITY HAS TRIED TO PHASE DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE WE UNDERSTAND THAT 12 AND A HALF ACRES DOESN'T JUST DEVELOP IN ONE PHASE OR OVERNIGHT AND SO AS OF AS RECENT APPROVALS ATTEST DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES TO THE INTERIM USE PERMIT WHERE IN INTERVIEWS WOULD BE EXTENDED BUT THEN IT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO AN INITIAL PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT THE IDEA BEING THAT THE INNER THE REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING WOULD EVENTUALLY BE PHASED OUT OVER TIME AND THEN THE THOSE DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES HAS CERTAIN COMPLIANCE DATES AND SO THOSE COMPLIANCE DATES ARE ON THE SCREEN IN THE FIRST FEW THEY JUST DEAL WITH KIND OF LIKE SETTING THE STAGE FOR A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION THOSE WILL THE APPLICANT WAS IN COMPLIANCE BUT THEN THE REMAIN THE REMAINDER AS OF MAY OF 2021 THE IF WAS GOING TO BE A REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT OR FINAL DEVELOPED PLAN SO THE ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS WERE TO BE APPLIED FOR IN 2021. WE DID NOT RECEIVE A COMPLETE APPLICATION SIMILARLY TO THE PLANT AND THEN THE CONSTRUCTION WAS INTENDED TO START IN 2022. WE DID NOT RECEIVE A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION OF COURSE AND NO CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION HAS STARTED AND SO WE'RE SEEING THE APPLICANT HAS NOT BEEN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES THAT WERE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.  I WANT TO TOUCH ON INTERVIEW'S PREMISE MORE GENERALLY AND THIS IS JUST OUT OF THE CITY CODE THE PURPOSE YOU KNOW THERE'S FIVE FIVE PURPOSE STATEMENTS BY HIGHLIGHTED A COUPLE AND ONE IS TO ENSURE THAT TEMPORARY USES REMAIN TEMPORARY IN NATURE.  SO WHAT IS TEMPORARY IS YOU KNOW, THAT'S A SUBJECTIVE TERM BUT OVER 30 YEARS YOU HAVE TO ASK THE QUESTION WHEN REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING TRULY AN INTERIM USE AND THEN THE FOURTH STATEMENT IS TO ENSURE THAT APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS ARE ATTACHED TO ENHANCE COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING USERS AND WE DON'T FEEL LIKE THAT'S BEEN DONE ON THE SITE.  SO AGAIN A LOT OF TEXT I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT BUT WHEN WE'RE REVIEWING INTERVIEWS PERMITS IT COMES DOWN TO THE FINDINGS AND HERE ARE THE FINDINGS THAT ARE OUTLINED IN CITY CODE THERE THERE ARE SEVEN TOTAL THERE ARE THE SIX MAIN FINDINGS THAT APPLY TO ANY INTERVIEWS PERMIT AND THEN THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL FINDING THAT'S ALSO IN THAT SECTION WHEN THERE'S AN EXTENSION REQUEST AND WE FEEL THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL THAT FINDINGS THAT WE CANNOT MAKE AS STAFF ONE BEING THAT THE INTERIM USE PERMIT OR THE REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING USE WILL DELAY PERMIT DEVELOPMENT AND.  WE FEEL THAT IT HAS DELAYED PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE SO WE CANNOT MAKE THAT FINDING . THE SECOND WILL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT IMPLEMENTATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ADOPTED DISTRICT PLAN. I OUTLINED SOME OF THE GUIDANCE FROM THAT IN THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN AND SOUTH OF DISTRICT PLAN AND WE FEEL THAT CONTINUATION OF REMOTE AIRPORT IN PERPETUITY ADVERSELY IMPACTS IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE PLANS FOR THREE, FOUR AND FIVE. YOU KNOW I CAN GO IN MORE DETAIL BUT I FEEL THOSE FINDINGS HAVE BEEN MET AND ITEM SIX RELATED TO OPEN ENFORCEMENT THERE ARE OPEN ORDERS FOR THE PARKING PARKING GO FACILITY DUE TO LACK OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOPER MILESTONES. SO CANNOT MAKE THAT FINDING AND THEN LASTLY THAT ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN SATISFIED RELATED TO PREVIOUS INTERVIEWS PERMITS AND AGAIN WE WE HAVE NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THOSE CONDITIONS SO WE COULDN'T MAKE THAT FINDING.  SO THE CITY HAS MADE SEVERAL OR A FAIR AMOUNT OF ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS ON TRYING TO MOVE ALONG THE DEVELOPMENT PHASE DEVELOPMENT OF PARKING GO AND THAT STARTED IN 2022.  WE'VE HAD A FEW MEETINGS WITH THE APPLICANT ABOUT POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS BUT WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS AND THEN IN THE SPRING IT REFERRED TO A VERMOUTH DIVISION FOR ENFORCEMENT AND THERE WAS A CITATION ISSUED YOU KNOW A LITTLE OVER A MONTH AGO BASED ON NONCOMPLIANCE. SO THE ENFORCEMENT IS STILL ACTIVE, ONGOING AND SO WE ARE. MR. CENTENARIO YES.  CAN I SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD A LITTLE BIT ON THAT? YEAH, THIS IS KEVIN TASK ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY AND GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY. CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS WE TURN IT OVER TO ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. WE DO ENFORCEMENT FOR CHAPTER ONE OF OUR CITY CODE WHICH AUTHORIZES CIVIL FINES FOR PROPERTY RELATED VIOLATIONS. SO WE TURN IT OVER. THEY FOLLOWED THEIR NORMAL PROCESSES IT WAS ISSUED A $1,000 FINE ON JULY 24TH PER CITY CODE YOU HAVE 25 DAYS AFTER THAT TO REQUEST A CONFERENCE WITH MY OR PAY THE FINE THOSE THINGS DID NOT HAPPEN CITY CODE STATES THAT FAILURE TO DO THOSE TWO THINGS OPERATES AS AN ADMISSION OF THE CHARGES SO THAT'S WHERE ENFORCEMENT IS AT RIGHT NOW THAT THERE HASN'T BEEN COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS SO THAT THE OPEN ENFORCEMENT FILE FOR HEALTH IS ONGOING. SO ANY QUESTIONS ELSE ON THAT ? I CAN ANSWER THEM BUT THAT'S KIND OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF ENFORCEMENT THANK YOU MR..  AND THEN A RECOMMENDATION TO CONCLUDE THE PRESENTATION IS THAT WE ARE RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE INTERVIEWS PERMIT FOR PARKING GO BASED ON OUR INABILITY TO MAKE FINDINGS 1 TO 6 AND THEN SO H TWO IN THE CITY CODE . ALL RIGHT THANK YOU MR..  ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM THANK MADAM CHAIR, PLANNING SUPERVISOR OF CENTENARIO TWO QUESTIONS TO THE REPRESENTATIVE OF PARKING GO ATTEND THE DRC MEETINGS YOU REFERENCED IN YOUR TIMELINE IS A COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM THE APPLICANT WAS IN ATTENDANCE A DRC AND SECOND QUESTION HAS THE APPLICANT WORKED WITH CITY OR APPROACHED THE CITY TO MODIFY OR CHANGE ANY ZONING REGULATIONS RELATED TO THEIR LOCATION?  SURE. THE CHAIR ALBRECHT COMMISSIONER YEAH THAT THAT IS ONE OF THE APPLICATIONS THAT WE ACTUALLY THOUGHT WE WERE GOING TO THE IDEA BEING ACTUALLY CHANGE THE CODE TO MAKE REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING PERMANENT USE AND THEN THE IDEA BEING THAT FIGURE OUT A WAY TO YOU KNOW FIND A COMPROMISE ALLOWS REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING BUT THEN ALLOWS DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SOUTH OF DISTRICT NOT SURE HOW THAT WOULD HAVE ENDED UP WE DIDN'T HAVE WE NEVER RECEIVED THAT APPLICATION THANK YOU I CAN I CAN SUPPLEMENT SOME MORE AS WELL CHAIR COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM SORRY NOT NOT FORCE OF HABIT YET SO THE ORIGINAL INTERIM USE PERMIT WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL AND IN 2019 SEPTEMBER 9TH THE CITY DID SEND A DEFAULT LETTER IN 2020 SO THEY WERE ALREADY IN DEFAULT OF CONDITIONS IN 2020 IN RESPONSE.  SO THEY DID COME BACK AND REQUEST OF MILESTONES THAT DID OCCUR DECEMBER 2020 SO THAT'S WHEN THE CURRENT MILESTONES WERE ESTABLISHED. SO AT LEAST FOR A TIME THEY DID COME BACK AND REQUEST CHANGES AND THOSE WERE GRANTED . SO THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED SINCE THEN. THANKS.  THANK YOU.  ON THAT SAME LINE MR. CENTENARIO, HAS THE COUNCIL DISCUSSED MAKING REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING GIVEN THE APPROXIMATE MONEY TO THE AIRPORT NOT AN INTERIM USE BUT A PERMANENT USE? AND HAS THERE BEEN A DISCUSSION AT THE COUNCIL OVER COMMISSIONERS?  YOU KNOW I KNOW I THINK IT'S BEEN DISCUSSED I DON'T I'D HAVE TO DEFER TO PLANNING MARK GUARD IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY SPECIFIC POLICY GUIDANCE THAT WE'VE RECEIVED FROM THE COUNCIL I'M NOT I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY YEAH.  CHAIR ALBRECHT COMMISSIONERS STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED THEIR POLICY FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. IT HAS NOT BEEN ADDED TO OF OUR WORK PLANS SO WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED SUCH DIRECTION THANK YOU COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM SORRY I HAD ONE MORE QUESTION I FORGOT TO WRITE DOWN. THERE IS A ANOTHER AIRPORT'S SHORT TERM PARKING PARCEL DIRECTLY TO THE EAST. ARE THEY UNDER SIMILAR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GUIDANCE AND ON A DIFFERENT TIMELINE? SURE YOU'RE ALBRECHT COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM THERE THEY ARE UNDER AN INTERIM USE PERMIT SIMILAR TO PARKING GO AND THERE THERE ARE THE DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES SO THERE'S THERE WAS A SIMILAR APPROACH THE APPLICANT AT THE OTHER REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING FACILITY APPLIED TO HAVE A ONE YEAR EXTENSION IT'S HARD TO GET INTO THE WEEDS WITHOUT HAVING A BROADER DISCUSSION BUT I'LL JUST TRY TO SUMMARIZE BY SAYING THEY THEY APPLIED TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE AND THEY ULTIMATELY WERE APPROVED THOSE MODIFICATIONS ULTIMATELY APPROVE A CITY COUNCIL SO THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER CURRIE THANK YOU CHAIR.  I DON'T KNOW KIND OF DIFFERENT I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY ABOUT THE SITUATION HERE. I THINK BASED ON THE HISTORY THE RECENT HISTORY FROM THE APPLICANT SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.  I'M MORE CURIOUS WHAT IS THE CITY DONE WITH THE THUNDERBIRD HOTEL SITE FOR REDEVELOPMENT OVER THE PAST EIGHT YEARS? HAVE WE PUT MUCH EFFORT INTO GETTING THAT REDEVELOPED?  THE PORT AUTHORITY AND CHARLES WORKED COMMISSIONER CURRY I UNFORTUNATELY I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE EFFORTS FROM THE PORT AUTHORITY OR THE CITY. YEAH SURE OVER IT. COMMISSIONER CURRY A LOT OF EFFORTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THAT SITE. THE BIGGEST BEING THAT IT WAS PART OF THE POTENTIAL EXPO SITE THE CITY HAD A BID FOR THE WORLD'S FAIR OR EXPO ULTIMATELY DID NOT RECEIVE BID BUT THAT SITE WAS RESERVED IN PART FOR THAT PROJECT.  GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER COOK TO MR. SINCE SCENARIO WHERE DOES THE CURRENT INTERIM USE PERMIT EXPIRE THE?  COMMISSIONER KICKED IN IT'S OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR WE HAVE DATE IS IT THE 16TH OF I WANT TO SAY IT WAS LIVE IT'S THE 13TH 13TH IT SOUNDS CORRECT. THANK YOU. OKAY MR. CENTENARIO.  WHAT HAPPENS ON OCTOBER 13TH IF THE COUNCIL DOES NOT APPROVE THIS EXTENSION IT CONSIDERS THE ULTIMATELY INTERVIEWS PERMIT WOULD EXPIRE AND SO YOU KNOW PRESUMING THAT PARKING GO WOULDN'T STOP IT WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OR BE A LAND USE VIOLATION IF THEY CONTINUE TO OPERATE. SO EVERY DAY WOULD BE COULD BE CONSIDERED A NEW VIOLATION IF THEY'RE TO OPERATE AND AS WE PLAY THAT OUT, WHAT THE USE COMMISSIONERS YOU KNOW I'M GOING TO HAVE TO DEFER TO MR. TABERSKI ON THE ULTIMATE END GAME BUT THE CITY HAS INITIATED ENFORCEMENT ACTION AND SO THE CITY COULD CONTINUE TO FINE AND THOSE FINES COULD BE RAMPED UP ULTIMATELY ON A DATED AND EVERY DAY THERE COULD BE A NEW FINE IN ORDER TO CEASE OPERATIONS OF THE REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING FACILITY AND TOTAL I I THINK THAT WOULD REQUIRE SOME COURT ORDER BUT I'D WANT DEFER TO MR. TUSK. YEAH. CHAIR COMMISSIONER COOKED IN THERE SEVERAL CIVIL REMEDIES FROM CIVIL FINES WHICH WE TALKED ABOUT THERE'S INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. YOU GO ASK A COURT TO MAKE THEM STOP AND IF THEY CONTINUE IT'S CONTEMPT BASICALLY THERE'S CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN OUR CIVIL ZONING CODE FOR MISDEMEANOR CRIMES FOR CONTINUING TO OPERATE A VARIETY ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS SO WE'RE NOT BOUND TO DO ANY SINGLE ONE OR ANY AT ALL OR THEY'RE OUT THERE. SO THANK YOU.  ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?  ALL RIGHT.  IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK THANK YOU WOULD YOU INTRODUCE YOURSELF?  HELLO, MY NAME IS DANNY WILLIAMSON. I'M THE MANAGER AT PARK AND GO AND ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IT SOUNDS PRETTY GRIM DOESN'T IT ON PARKING GO HAS BEEN CONTINUOUSLY WORKING DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY YOU SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A PACKET ABOUT THIS SIZE SHOWS THE NUMEROUS DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE WE ACTUALLY GOT VERY CLOSE TO MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PROJECT IN 2023. MIKE KNOWS THAT I PRESENTED THAT TO HIM BUT IT DOES REQUIRE AN INTEREST CAVEAT IN THE CAVEAT AS OUR BUSINESS HAS TO KEEP OPERATING AS WE MOVE THROUGH A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OVER TIME AND THE DESIGN WAS INTENDED TO PHASE OUT THE PARKING OVER A NUMBER OF YEARS THOSE DRAWINGS ARE AVAILABLE TO YOU. IT WAS 164 UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BUILT ON TOP OF 1152 I BELIEVE COVERED PARKING SPOTS AND A LITTLE BIT OF RETAIL AND THEN MULTIPLE PHASES GOING FORWARD WITH A FINAL WHERE WE WOULD TAKE THE PARKING RAMPS WHICH WOULD HAVE EXTRA TO CEILING HEIGHT AND CONVERT THOSE OVER TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SLOWLY THE PARKING WOULD PHASE OUT THE CATCH TO THIS AND THE REASON WE'LL NEVER BE ABLE TO MEET THE MILESTONES IS REALLY KIND OF LIKE A LIKE THE THE MOUSE ON THE WHEEL OUR OWNER IS NOT GOING TO SPEND 800 TO $1000000 AND $1,000 MILLION ON AN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGN TO COME INTO THE COUNCIL, FIND OUT IT CAN'T BE APPROVED. HE'S JUST NOT GOING TO SPEND THAT KIND OF MONEY.  SO WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH DEVELOPERS OVER THE LAST I'VE BEEN WITH THEM 19 YEARS AND YOU KNOW SOMETIMES THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS YOU DO THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND IT DOESN'T WORK WELL WE DID THAT FOR SIX AND A HALF YEARS AND THE DEVELOPERS NEVER COME THROUGH. THEY WORK ON IT. GIVE US A CARTOON AN OVERINFLATED PRICE. EIGHT AND A HALF MONTHS LATER WE FIND OUT IT DOESN'T WORK.  THERE'S TOO MUCH EQUITY OR TOO MUCH COST INVOLVED IN NO PROFIT.  SO FINALLY WE HAVE THE BENEFIT THAT WE HAVE A PERSON IN HOUSE THAT CAN ACTUALLY DRAW UP A SET OF DRAWINGS.  WE DON'T HAVE AUTOCAD BUT WE DO IT THE OLD FASHIONED WAY AND WE HAND DREW UP IN OTHER WORDS DESIGNED A PROJECT THAT WE THEN TOOK TO A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR WHO THEN GAVE US A PRICE A GUARANTEED PRICE THAT SUDDENLY WAS ON BUDGET.  SO I HATE TO PICK ON THE DEVELOPERS THEY WERE ALL INFLATING THE PRICES OVER AND OVER AND OVER. THAT BUDGET ACTUALLY WORKED IN 2023 AND MIKE AND I WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT BUT THE CATCH WAS HOW DO WE BRING IT TO THE COUNCIL BECAUSE WE HAVE TO HAVE CAVEAT THAT SOMEHOW YOU GOT TO FINANCE THE PARKING WHILE YOU MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THE PROPERTY OVER TIME I MEET WITH TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS AND I SHOWED THEM THE PROJECT. THEY BOTH LIKED IT OKAY?  THEY THOUGHT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA. THEIR SUGGESTIONS WERE WELL ONE COULD BE AN EXTENDED MIXED USE I'M SORRY EXTENDED INTERIM USE ON THE PARKING RAMP SO IT COULD BE FUNDED BUT BANKS NOT GOING TO LOAN MONEY IN FIVE YEARS OR THEY SAID MAYBE YOU COULD DO A PERMANENT ZONING CHANGE TO ALLOW THE OFF AIRPORT PARKING TO OPERATE WHILE THAT CHANGE COMES OVER TIME AND THERE IS A DRAWING THAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET THAT SHOWS THOSE PHASES WE CONTINUE TO WORK THAT EVEN TO THIS DAY WE KNOW ABOUT THE FINE. I DID CALL AND TALK TO THE PERSON THAT EXECUTED THE FINE AND HIS RESPONSE WAS LET'S SEE WHAT HAPPENS WITH COUNCIL TO SEE IF IT'S GOING TO BE A SECOND FINE BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY WE WRITE THE CHECK FOR $1,000 THAT'S THAT'S NOT CHANGING ANYTHING WE DO ANY DAY SOON. BUT THE POINT IS IT'S EITHER YOU PAY THE FINE OR I GUESS IT GETS ATTACHED YOUR PROPERTY TAXES BUT WE'VE BEEN GOING BACK FORTH. WE PAID A FINE OR WAIT TILL WE SEE WHAT THE COUNCIL DECIDES ON THE NINTH. SO WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS WE'VE NOT BEEN TRYING TO IGNORE ANYTHING BUT THE ISSUE IS WE ALMOST HAVE TO FIND AND THAT'S WHAT I WAS TALKING TO MAKE IT ABOUT HOW DO GO TO THE COUNCIL TO REQUEST THIS CHANGE SO THAT THE WHO IS VERY EXCITED TO DO SOME DEVELOPMENT. HE'S NOT TRYING TO DODGE THIS . HOW DOES HE FINALLY HAVE SOME ASSURANCES THAT WE CAN BUILD SOMETHING IT CAN BE FINANCED AND IT'S WORTH PUTTING HIS MONEY INTO AND THAT'S THIS LITTLE WHEEL RIGHT? THAT'S WHY IT SOUNDS GRIM BUT NOBODY'S TRYING TO AVOID ANYTHING. WE CAN'T MEET THE MILESTONES YOUR REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MILESTONES SUBMITTALS REQUIRE AN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING FIRM TO PRODUCE THE DOCUMENTS. WE'RE NOT TO SPEND THAT MONEY. I PRODUCED THE DOCUMENTS. IT IS A REAL PROJECT. IT IS ACTUALLY DRAWN UP WITH ARCHITECTONIC GRIDS IN THEIR ELECTRICAL PLUMBING FINISHES. IT'S ALL IN THOSE DRAWINGS BUT THE ISSUE IS WE HAVE TO HAVE A WAY TO FINANCE THAT PROJECT AND THE OWNER IS READY TO GO. WE'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING AT A HOTEL OPTION TOMORROW SO WE HAVE MULTIPLE THINGS ON THE TABLE BUT WE TRIED FOR SIX AND A HALF YEARS TO ADD SOME OF THIS LITTLE BOOKLET TELLS YOU THAT STORY BUT IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY. WE'RE KIND OF AT THE POINT WE HAVE TO DO THIS OURSELVES OR IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN SO I'M OPEN TO QUESTIONS. I TRIED TO DO 3 MINUTES BUT IT'S A MUCH LONGER STORY OBVIOUSLY I.  THANK YOU MR. WILLIAMSON. QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT I DO LIKE THAT YOU LIKE OUR PROPERTY COMMISSIONER COOKSON THANKS MR. CHAIR.  MR. WILLIAMSON FOLLOWING UP ON THE QUESTIONS I ASKED STAFF IF THE COUNCIL DOES NOT APPROVE THIS INTERIM USE PERMIT, WHAT'S YOUR PLAN?  FORWARD PARKED CARS THAT'S HOW WE MAKE OUR MONEY. THAT'S WHAT OUR BUSINESS DOES WITHOUT A PERMIT WE'LL JUST HAVE TO KEEP MOVING.  I CAN'T SPEAK FOR WHAT THE OWNER WILL DO BUT I KNOW HE WON'T JUST BACK DOWN ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM MR. WILLIAMSON YOU MENTIONED I READ THROUGH MOST OF THE HUNDRED 65 PAGE REPORT LAST NIGHT AND YOU YOU MENTIONED KIND OF THE CURRENT ITERATION OF THIS PLAN HAS MIXED USE AT GRADEOMMERCIAL AND UNITS ABOVE WITH A 152 PARKING SPACES AND INSIDE AND YOU MENTIONED THE RAMP COULD BE IN THE FUTURE RETROFITTED A AN APARTMENT USE WITH WITH THE LEVEL OF THE PLANS RIGHT RIGHT NOW DO YOU KNOW THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE OF THE PARKING RAMP WELL YEAH AND KIND OF HOW YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO RETROFIT IF POSSIBLE IF YOU'LL LOOK AT THAT PLAN REALLY CAREFULLY THE FRONT THE FRONT STREET SIDE IS ALREADY UNITS SO ALL THAT'S HAPPENING IS YOU'RE INFILLING THE PERIMETERS THAT'S REDUCING THE PARKING BUT THEN YOU NEED PARKING FOR THOSE ADDITIONAL UNITS.  ONE OF THE TRICKS THAT CAME INTO THIS THING IS WHEN WE WERE READY TO START THIS THING LAST 2023 IN THE SPRING IF THE INTEREST RATES HAD STAYED DOWN WHICH THEY DID NOT AND THAT'S WHERE JOHN CALLED ME AND SAID STOP EVERYTHING.  THAT'S WHAT KILLED IT WHEN THE INTEREST RATES GOT TOO HIGH EVEN THE PARKING INVOLVED THE PARKING HAS TO BE THERE. IT'S WHAT MAKES THE REVENUE TO MAKE THIS WHOLE PROJECT GO WITHOUT THE REVENUE FOR THE PARKING. THIS IS A NON PROFITABLE PROJECT WOULD COST US ABOUT $70 MILLION A YEAR INSTEAD OF MAKING PROFIT ON THE PROPERTY SO IT JUST IT WON'T GO WITH THE PARKING IN THERE WE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN BUT ONCE THOSE INTEREST RATES WENT UP I DID CHECK RENTAL RATES TO MAKE SURE IF WE COULD INFLATE THOSE WE CAN'T. AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT THE LAST OF CONSTRUCTION COST EVEN THOUGH I FOUND A LOWER NUMBER, THEY'RE STILL HIGHER THAN WHAT WE CAN DO AND THOSE ARE IN THE PRO FORMA AS YOU CAN TAKE A LOOK AT THAT IF YOU WANT.  I MEAN I'LL ADD ON TO THAT IF YOU LIKE. NO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  THE REASON I WAS ASKING ABOUT THE INFILL IN THE PACKET THERE WAS A NOTE THAT THE PARKING GARAGE WOULD BE POST CONCRETE AND I HAVE EXTENSIVE PRIVATE MY PRIVATE LIFE I WORK I'VE WORKED ALMOST A DECADE FOR A COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND RETROFIT IN POST ENGINE CONCRETE CAN BE QUITE DIFFICULT YOU'RE PRONE TO BLOW ATTENDANT OUT THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND JEOPARDIZE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE STRUCTURE. AND SO I GUESS IS IT POSSIBLE WITH YOUR PLANNING TO PRECISELY LEAVE FOR WHERE YOU WOULD PROPOSE TO DO RESTROOMS AND KITCHENS AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH SLABS? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT OUR PLAN WAS ALL THAT WAS BEING BUILT IN AHEAD OF TIME. SO WE WERE INVESTING A LITTLE MORE MONEY TO GET THE EXTRA FLOOR TO FLOOR WHICH YOU WOULD NEED WHICH BY THE WAY IS THE CORE PROBLEM WITH A LOT OF WHAT THEY CALL THESE TEXTS WRAPS YOU'VE BUILT ALL OVER THE PLACE THE MIDDLE IS UNUSABLE ONCE THAT PARKING CHANGES AND WE START TO USE LIGHT RAIL OR WHATEVER OTHER SYSTEMS WE'RE GOING TO FIND WE GOT ALL KINDS OF PARKING RAMPS THAT I DON'T KNOW WHAT GOING TO DO WITH. IT'S A PROBLEM. SO THAT'S SOMETHING I'VE BEEN TALKING TO GLENN AND MIKE.  OUR PLAN IS TO HAVE IT SO IT CAN BE CONVERTED OVER THE LONG TERM BECAUSE WHO KNOWS WHAT WILL REALLY BE NEEDED IN THE FUTURE.  THANK YOU. LAST QUESTION FOR ME. YOU SAID YOU'RE WITH A HOTEL USER TOMORROW CURRENTLY THERE'S A HOTEL USER REALLY WANT TO BE ON TOP OF A PARKING RAMP? WELL, IF YOU LOOK AT THAT PLAN REALLY CAREFULLY, WE BUILT 164 UNITS ON TOP OF THE PARKING RAMP. IF YOU LOOK RIGHT NEXT TO IT, THERE'S A HOTEL PLANNED WE KIND OF THOUGHT BACK IN 2023 IF WE DID THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS WE FELT THE APARTMENTS WERE GOING TO COME VERY QUICKLY.  SO WE WERE TRYING TO BUILD MORE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON TOP OF THAT RAMP, COVER THAT ACREAGE WE WOULD LOSE BECAUSE THERE'S SOME REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE SO MANY UNITS PER ACRE. SO THESE TWO THINGS HAVE BEEN IN I MEAN WE'RE NOT HOTEL PEOPLE, WE'RE NOT APAMENT PEOPLE. THAT'S WHY WE DIDN'T BUILD THREE OR 400 UNITS BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO TAKE TOO MUCH RISK. WE DO PARKING ALL OF THE UNITED STATES THAT'S WHAT WE DO. SO THOSE TWO THINGS WE THINK WOULD HAPPEN VERY QUICKLY AND THE HOTEL PEOPLE DON'T MIND BEING A TOP OF THE RAMP. THEY ACTUALLY LIKE IT BECAUSE THEN THEIR CUSTOMERS COULD USE THE SHUTTLE BUSSES TO GO TO THE AIRPORT OR THEY COULD USE THE LIGHT RAIL ACROSS THE STREET THANK YOU.  ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS?  ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. WILLIAMS.  THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES INCLUDE A PUBLIC HEARING SO WE WILL OFFICIALLY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IF THERE'S ANYONE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO TESTIFY, FEEL FREE TO COME UP.  PLANNING MANAGER MARK GUARD IS THERE ANYONE ON LINE CHAIR ALBRECHT NO ONE ON LINE FOR THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL GIVE IT A SECOND .  ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. I LOOK FOR A MOTION CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING MOTION IN CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING.  SECOND, THERE IS A MOTION TO THE PUBLIC HEARING IN A SECOND ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSED AND THAT MOTION PASSES FOR ZERO DISCUSSION.  COMMISSIONER CURRIE THANK YOU CHAIR YEAH I THINK I THINK THE APPLICANT SUMMED IT UP PRETTY WELL. I THINK INSANITY IS ONE WORD TO DESCRIBE THE SITUATION SOUNDS LIKE THEY HAVE A LOT OF OPTIONS. THAT'S WHAT HE AND THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO SPEND ANY MONEY AND CAN'T MAKE ANY MONEY PARKING I MEAN TO BE HONEST IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THE BEST PATH FORWARD IS TO TERMINATE THE USE AND LET THEM FIGURE OUT A NEW DEAL WITH THE CITY THAT'S MY THINKING .  I'LL CHIME IN HERE WE.  MR. HOOK AND I AT LEAST HAVE BEEN ON THE COUNT FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A WHILE AND HAVE SEEN SOME APPLICATIONS COME THROUGH FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF PARKING GOES AND WHILE I UNDERSTAND THE CHALLENGE MAKING SURE THAT YOU GET AND YOU PAY FOR ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS I THINK THERE IS A REALLY GOOD SOUND REASON REASONING FOR THAT AND I BELIEVE THAT THE CITY HAS THE THE STAFF HAS THE CITY'S BEST INTERESTS IN MIND AND I THINK THAT THAT IS PART OF THE PROCESS. THAT'S A REASON THERE'S A PART OF THE AND IN A SIMILAR WAY WE'VE HAD WE'VE HAD SOME DISCUSSION AT THIS BODY ABOUT REMOTE AIRPORT FOR AIRPORT PARKING AND DEVELOPMENT ON THOSE PARCELS AND HAVE HAD GOOD DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WHAT THE MARKET IS LIKE INTEREST RATES, CONSTRUCTION PRICES ALL OF THAT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED HERE AND I THINK THE CONCLUSION THAT WE CAME TO ON THE OTHER SITE AS MR. CENTENARIO SAID WAS THAT WE WERE ALLOWING FOR AN EXTENSION OF THOSE TIMELINES BUT THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE OF PLAN THE SMALL AREA PLAN STILL GUIDES THE USE TO NOT BE REMOTE PARKING ANY LONGER AND SO IN ORDER TO DO THAT I THINK WE DO NEED TO SEE SOME MOVEMENT HERE. SO I AM IN SUPPORT OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION COMMISSIONER LOOKED AT THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR. YES.  THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME WE'VE SEEN PARKING GO. THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THE CITY HAS SEEN PARKING GO. IT'S BEEN AN AWFULLY LONG JOURNEY ALMOST AS OLD AS I AM AND SO JUST LIKE TO SAY I MUST SAY I'M A LITTLE OFFENDED THIS EVENING ABOUT THE COMMENTS OF NOT HAVING LICENSED PROFESSIONALS ON THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS AS SOMEONE WHO HOLDS A PD IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA THERE'S A DARN GOOD REASON WE DO THAT IT'S FOR LIFE SAFETY AND IT'S NOT ABOUT WHETHER YOU HAVE A CAT IN YOUR OFFICE. IT'S ABOUT SAFETY AND THAT'S WHAT ARCHITECTS DO AND THAT'S WHAT LICENSED ENGINEERS DO AND WE'RE ALL LUCKY TO HAVE THEM. AND SO I'M NOT AT ALL INCLINED TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY ON SOMETHING LIKE THAT MOVING ON IT'S HARD TO IGNORE THAT IN THIS VERY SAME NEIGHBORHOOD WITHIN BLOCKS WE'VE SEEN FOUR OR FIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAST THREE OR FOUR YEARS AND THOSE WERE ON EMPTY LOTS THAT WEREN'T MAKING ANY REVENUE AND SO SOMEHOW THOSE FOUND A WAY TO PENCIL OUT AND.  THEY DIDN'T HAVE A REVENUE STREAM WHERE THIS HAS HAD A CONSISTENT REVENUE STREAM 1991 I HAVE TO EXPRESS MY DISAPPOINTMENT WITH MY QUESTION OF WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN NEXT MONTH THIS IF THIS INTERIM USE PERMIT WERE TO EXPIRE AND THEY GET ANSWER OF WE'RE GOING TO PARK CARS THAT DOES NOT ALIGN WITH MY BELIEFS OF BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR AND A GOOD RESIDENT AND A GOOD PARTNER WITH THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON. IT GOES AGAINST EVERYTHING I BELIEVE IN IN THAT SENSE. FROM THERE I LIKE TO ASK MR. SCENARIO TO GO TO THE SLIDE WITH THE FINDINGS IF I COULD PLEASE AND THIS IS WHAT WE'RE HERE, RIGHT?  IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER IF I LIKE REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF I THINK THE APPLICANT IS NOT DOING THEIR HARDEST. WHAT MATTERS IS THE FINDINGS AND WE HAVE FINDINGS TO MAKE AND WHAT HAPPENS HERE IS THAT IF WE CARE IF WE CAN'T MAKE THE FINDINGS WE CANNOT APPROVE THE APPLICATION.  SO AS I LOOK THROUGH THESE REQUIRED FINDING NUMBER ONE SAYS THE USE WILL NOT DELAY PERMANENT DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE. THIS INTERIM USE PERMIT WOULD DELAY DEVELOPMENT PERMANENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE I CANNOT MAKE A FINDING NUMBER ONE REQUIRED FUNDING NUMBER TWO SAYS THE PROPOSAL YOU PROPOSED USE WILL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT AMORTIZATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE AND DISTRICT USE PLANS. THIS WOULD IMPACT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE PLANS . I CANNOT MAKE FINDING NUMBER TWO FINDING NUMBER SIX THE PROPERTY IN WHICH THE USE IS SITUATED HAS NO OTHER ENFORCEMENT ORDERS. WE KNOW THAT IS NOT THE CASE THEREFORE CANNOT MAKE FINDING NUMBER SIX IN THE LAST SUB FINDING THERE ALL PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. WE KNOW THAT ALSO IS NOT FOR THAT REASON I CAN NOT MAKE THAT FINDING AND CANNOT APPROVE THIS APPLICATION THIS EVENING ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION  MR. MARKER GAAD WOULD YOU PLEASE I KNOW COMMISSIONER COOKSON MENTIONED THE LEVEL OF DISCRETION THAT THE PLANNING PLANNING COMMITTEE HAS PLANNING COMMISSION HAS. WOULD YOU JUST REMIND US AGAIN THE LEVEL OF DISCRETION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM?  YES. CHAIR ALBRIGHT COMMISSIONERS THE LEVEL OF DISCRETION IS RELATIVELY LOW BUT THAT RELATES THE FINDINGS AT PLAY. JUST AS COMMISSIONER CAPTAIN MENTIONED, IT'S ALL ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT YOU CAN MAKE THE FINDINGS AND IF YOU CANNOT THERE'S NO WAY TO APPROVE THE ITEM. THANK YOU.  COMMISSIONER CURRIE. YEAH. I GOT ONE MORE. THANK YOU. SURE. I GOT  ONE MORE COMMENT. AGAIN, I GUESS JUST KIND OF BASED ON THE APPLICANT'S COMMENTARY WE'RE NOT GOING TO SPEND MONEY CAN'T MAKE MONEY WITHOUT PARKING. I MEAN IN GENERAL THEY JUST SOUND LIKE KIND OF THE WRONG PARTY TO HAVE AS A PARTNER IN FULFILLING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HERE. SO AGAIN, I THINK THIS COURSE OF ACTION IS JUST TERMINATE THE USE AND THEY CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO TRY TO DO WITH THE SITE AND WE'LL JUST PUSH FORWARD WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.  I WE HAVE SOME SORT OF DIRECTION HERE. SO LOOKING FOR A MOTION COMMISSIONER GUPTA MADAM CHAIR HAVING BEEN UNABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS NUMBER ONE TO ANSWER IN SECTION 21.5 01. 05E AND UNABLE TO MAKE THE ADDITIONAL REQUIRED IN SECTION 21.50 1.0 5H2I MOVED TO RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL DENY AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING AT 7901 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. AS A REMINDER, IF YOU ARE VOTING I THAT MEANS THAT YOU AGREE WITH THE MOTION OF BEING UNABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS NAY WOULD BE THAT YOU ARE YOU ARE IN DISAGREEMENT WITH BEING UNABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR THAT ITEM ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION?  ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I, I OPPOSED THAT MOTION PASSES ZERO. THAT ITEM WILL AS AN A CONSENT AGENDA ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 9TH UNLESS IT'S THE RECOMMENDATION WAS NOT THE SAME THEN BUT IT WILL IT WILL APPEAR AS CONSENT AGENDA ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 9TH. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.  FINAL ITEM I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER NEEDS TO EXCUSE HIMSELF IS ANOTHER SO WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER ONE WHICH IS ON YOUR AGENDA WHICH IS OUR ITEM NUMBER.  THAT IS A MAJOR REVISION TO PRELIMINARY AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A PARTIAL REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTH SHOPPING CENTER.  COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM, I BELIEVE YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU TO ADD, SAID CHAIR ALBRECHT I WILL BE ABSTAINING FROM PARTICIPATION IN THIS ITEM DUE TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CANDOR AND . WE WILL WAIT. AS COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM EXCUSED HIMSELF.  ALL RIGHT SO UNFORTUNATELY WE ARE NOW AT TWO COMMISSIONERS WHICH IS NOT A QUORUM SO WE WILL CONTINUE WITH THE ITEM BUT ARE UNABLE AS A BODY TO MAKE ANY RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL BASED ON LACK OF QUORUM. SO WE WILL BE HEARING FROM STAFF AND THEN WE WILL OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONTINUING THIS ITEM. SO CHAIR ALBRECHT I JUST THAT A LITTLE BIT. SURE. CHAIR COMMISSIONER SO IT'S ONE RULE 1.6 IN YOUR PC RULES OF PROCEDURE OR A LESSER AMOUNT OF QUORUM CAN OPEN A MEETING AND HOLD TAKE TESTIMONY. YOU JUST CAN'T FINALLY ACT LIKE YOU SAID. SO I'M JUST SAYING THAT'S OUR RULES. WE CAN DO THAT SO EVERYBODY KNOWS THANKS.  THANK YOU, MR. TUSK.  ALL RIGHT, MR. CENTENARIO, I BELIEVE YOU HAVE STAFF REPORT . THANK YOU. YOUR ALBERT COMMISSIONERS. I'LL BE VERY BRIEF.  I JUST WANT TO INTRODUCE THE PROJECT AND FOR THE FOLKS OR LISTENING. BUT THIS IS A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPED PLANS FOR THE SOUTH SHOPPING CENTER AND WE'VE SEEN OTHER AT DOWNTOWN COME AND GO BUT RECENT APPROVALS OR RECENT APPLICATIONS RATHER DID NOT MATERIALIZE.  SO WE'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH WHERE SOUTH SIDE SHOPPING CENTER IS. THIS IS A FRANKLY A MASSIVE PROPERTY THAT'S BETWEEN PINE AVENUE ON THE WEST INTERSTATE 494 ON THE NORTH AMERICAN BOULEVARD WEST THE SOUTH AND THEN ON THE EAST IS KNOX AVENUE.  WHAT'S UNIQUE IS YOU'LL PROBABLY HEAR US REFER TO KNOX AVENUE AS THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE THAT'S ACTUALLY A PRIVATE STREET BUT SOME FOLKS IN OUR OFFICE CALL IT NOT KNOX. SOME CALL IT KNOX AVENUE EXTENDED. I THINK I'LL PROBABLY JUST CALL IT KNOX JUST FOR EASE. BUT JUST WANTED TO JUST WANT TO KNOW THAT THAT THAT IS A PRIVATE STREET. BUT IT IS IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TERMS OF HOW THE DEVELOPMENT IS ORIENTED AND HOW THINGS GET REDEVELOPED.  SO THE THE APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER, THEY PRODUCED A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND YOU CAN SEE THAT ON SCREEN HERE. SO THE RED DASHES JUST TO IDENTIFY WHAT THAT MEANS THAT THAT IS A THAT IDENTIFIES THE SCOPE OF WORK WITH THE INITIAL PHASE. SO JUST TO EXPLAIN PDP'S VERSUS EFTPOS PDP'S FOR A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. SO THAT'S YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES YOU CAN REFER TO IT AS THE MASTER PLAN THAT MIGHT BE MULTIPLE PHASES THAT ARE IN THE FUTURE THAT HAVE THAT HAVE NOT MATERIALIZED YET.  SO USUALLY THAT IS ACCOMPANIED BY A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHICH IS THE NEXT PHASE OF THAT REDEVELOPMENT.  SO IF YOU ARE DEVELOPING A FIVE PHASE PROJECT YOU WOULD HAVE A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FIVE PHASES BUT YOU'D LIKELY HAVE A FAILED PLAN FOR THE FIRST PHASE OR WHATEVER PHASE THAT YOU'RE WORKING ON.  AND SO WHAT YOU WHAT YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THE REDEVELOPMENT THE HERBERGER IS AND TOYS R US BUILDING HAS BEEN REMOVED. THERE WOULD BE SOME ADDITIONAL RETAIL THAT'S NORTH OF THE BOWLING ALLEY AND THE FORMER BED BATH BEYOND SPACE THAT WOULD ALSO BE REMOVED AND IN ITS PLACE THE APPLICANT WOULD CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY HUNDRED AND 20,000 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING WITH AN OUTDOOR ATHLETIC FIELD THE USER BEING DICK'S HOUSE THE SPORT.  SO THAT'S THAT'S THE PHASE THAT THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING APPROVAL FOR NOW TO BUILD TO CONSTRUCT NOW THE FUTURE PHASE THAT'S IDENTIFIED IN THE PDP IS FOR A 100,000 SQUARE FOOT FOUR STOREY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING.  SO AGAIN FUTURE PHASE. THE OTHER ANOTHER PHASE THAT IS NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE PDP YET WAS IDENTIFIED THE STAFF REPORT AND IN THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IS IS A FUTURE PHASE AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE OR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KNOX AND AMERICAN. AND SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ZONING MAP THAT ACTUALLY HAS A DIFFERENT ZONING DESIGNATION AND IT WAS NEGOTIATED BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE CITY THAT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD MEET CERTAIN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, ONE OF THEM BEING A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO. SO THAT NOT ON THE PDP. HOWEVER THE CITY IS FEELS THAT IS A VERY SITE AND THERE ARE A MYRIAD OF REASONS THAT'S NOT BEING SHOWN HERE ONE BEING CHALLENGES WITH SERVICES CITY SERVICES. SO THAT'S A VERY DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PDP AND THE FTP. SO WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO BUILD NOW IS ON THE SCREEN YOU SEE THE RETAIL BUILDING ON THE NORTH END OF THE SITE SEE THE THE PAD,  THE FUTURE OFFICE BUILDING IN THE NORTHEAST SECTION AND THEN YOU SEE RECONSTRUCT ONE OF THE REALLY THE ROUGHLY THE EASTERN HALF OF THE PARKING LOT IT'S IN THERE IS VIRTUALLY NO LANDSCAPING IN THE PARKING FACILITY TODAY AND THE APPLICANT WOULD BE BRINGING THE THE PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS THE LIGHTING, THE LANDSCAPING INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THIS WITH THIS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.  AND SO WE ARE THAT IS JUST AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PRELIMINARY FILE DEVELOPED PLANS FOR SOUTHTOWN AND DUE TO THE COURTROOM ISSUE WE ARE RECOMMENDING CONTINUANCE TO THE SEPTEMBER 5TH MEETING. THANK YOU MR. CENTENARIO ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ALL RIGHT . SEEING NONE. WOULD THE APPLICANT TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM  PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURSELF. I AM JOHN DREYER WITH CARLA ANDERSON THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SUPERVISOR CENTENARIO MANAGER MARK HOGAN.  COMMISSIONERS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO PUSH FOR THE CONTINUANCE TO THE SEPTEMBER 5TH MEETING. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING AND AS MR. TUSK YOU MENTIONED, WE CAN OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND HEAR ANY TESTIMONY OF FOLKS WHO ARE HERE TONIGHT. WE WILL THIS ITEM LIKELY AND THEN THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL TIME TO TESTIFY AT THE OTHER MEETING. SO I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING SO ANYONE WHO IS INTERESTED IN SPEAKING CAN COME UP AND INTRODUCE.  WE HAVE A SIGN IN SO IT'S SOMETHING WE DO.  OH, WE ALREADY SIGNED IT. GREAT. COME ON.  AND HOW WE'LL DO THIS IS WE HAVE SHOT UP HERE WITH 3 MINUTES AND WE'LL GIVE EVERYONE WHO IS IN THE CHAMBERS AND ONLINE TONIGHT 3 MINUTES TO TESTIFY AND THEN WE WILL WAIT TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY ADDITIONAL TESTIFIERS AND THEN WE'LL ASK IF ANYONE HAS ADDITIONAL THINGS THEY WANT TO ADD AND WE'LL GIVE ANYONE NEEDS ADDITIONAL 3 MINUTES AN ADDITIONAL 3 MINUTES. WELCOME.  HELLO. MY NAME IS ROBERT COLEMAN AND I'M A RESIDENT OF BLOOMINGTON . I AM DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED BY THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT THAT CROSS HENDERSON BROUGHT FORWARD TODAY AND I ASK THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND REJECTION.  THEY HAVE THE CHANCE THE PLANNING THE PAN-AMERICAN DISTRICT IS ONE OF THE PROJECTS I'VE BEEN MOST EXCITED ABOUT BUT THE FACT THAT IT IS I FIND IT SAD IS NOT A REASON ENOUGH TO REJECT IT WHICH IS WHY I WILL ALSO BE GIVING AN ARGUMENT OF HOW I BELIEVE IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE PAN-AMERICAN PLAN IN THE SENATE REPORT IT SAYS THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING AND LAND USE GUIDELINES IN THE PLAN AND I SORT OF AGREE I'LL TALK ABOUT THE FLOOR AREA RATIO BUT I ALSO BELIEVE THAT IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE IN THE IN THE THE PLAN AND SPECIFICALLY THE GOALS AND THE STRATEGIES THAT THE CITY WILL EMPLOYEE IN DETERMINING WHAT REDEVELOPMENT WOULD LOOK LIKE WHEN IT WAS WHEN THERE WAS THE PRESENTATION PORT AUTHORITY MEETING THE THE MOOD WAS NOT VERY GOOD.  I FOUND THAT CROSS EVERSON WAS IMMEDIATELY ON THE DEFENSIVE SAYING HOW THEY BELIEVE THEIR PROPOSAL MEETS THE PLAN BUT AT THE SAME TIME CLAIMING THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO MEET THE PLAN. THEY SEEK A TIFF TO POACH A RETAILER FROM RICHFIELD AND WANT TO USE THE LOSS OF THE SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY FOR OFFICE SPACE AND DELAY ANY KEY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UNTIL AFTER CAPACITY HAS ENDED WITH VERY LITTLE.  THERE'S NOT A GOOD PATH FORWARD ON FUNDING FOR IT.  WE MAY NOT SEE THAT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UNTIL 28, 29, 30 THEY HID BEHIND ARTS TO HIDE THE FACT THAT THE PHASE ONE AND TWO DON'T CONTAIN ANYTHING LIKE WHAT THE IMAGES DEPICT.  THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT ALIGN WITH GOAL 3.1 TO CREATE A PUBLIC OKAY THE THE OPTION OF PARKING DOES NOTHING TO CREATE ATTRACTIVE PUBLIC SPACES AND I WOULD NOT DESCRIBE DICK'S HOUSE OF SUPPORT AS BEING A QUALITY DESIGN. THE LANDSCAPING THEY ARE TOUTING IS A JOKE AND BASICALLY ONLY CONSISTS OF PARKING ISLAND TREES WHICH IS BETTER THAN NOTHING. YES BUT THERE'S VERY LITTLE A HUMAN BEING CAN DO TO ENJOY A PARKING ISLAND TREE. I HAVE SOME EXAMPLES IF I HAVE MORE TIME OF THE HIGHLAND BRIDGE AREA OF DEVELOPMENT IN SAINT PAUL THAT I THINK THE PAN-AMERICAN SHOULD EMULATE THE LAYOUT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT DOESN'T ALIGN WITH THE PLANS PROPOSED STREET GRID INSTEAD OF REAFFIRMING THE CAR DEPENDENT MID-CENTURY DESIGN AND LIKEWISE DOES THE BARE MINIMUM FOR PEDESTRIANS WITHOUT THE PLANS A MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS FILLING GOAL 2.4 THE FORMER RATIO IS INCREASED IN THIS PLAN BUT IT WILL BE 0.37 WHICH IS BELOW SEA THREE'S MINIMUM OF FIVE AND ALSO BELOW THE PREVIOUSLY AGREED UPON SPECIAL MINIMUM OF 0.4 FILLING GOAL 1.1 AND MOST IMPORTANTLY IF THIS IS APPROVED IT WILL PUT IN JEOPARDY THE THE PROPOSED ARE THE THE PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT LEVELS I HAVE NUMBERS FOR HOW IT WILL BE BUT IF THERE'S NOT IF WE DON'T SEE THE SEWER CAPACITY INCREASE BY BY 2030 THEN WE'RE NOT GOING TO MEET THE 1540 HOUSING UNITS. WE'RE GOING TO BE FAR BEHIND AT 603. I HOPE TO HAVE ANOTHER 3 MINUTES. I'M SORRY THAT I HAVE SO MUCH TIME.  THANK YOU. I SEE ANYONE ELSE IN THE CHAMBERS WHO LIKE TO TESTIFY.  MR. MARKEGARD IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO TESTIFY?  CHAIR ALBRIGHT NO ONE ONLINE FOR THIS ITEM.  GREAT. ANY ADDITIONAL FOLKS IN THE CHAMBERS WHO WANT TO TESTIFY?  ALL RIGHT, FEEL FREE.  COME UP. YOU HAVE AN ADDITIONAL 3 MINUTES. THANK YOU SO MUCH.  OKAY.  IF THE IF THIS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS APPROVED, THEN IT WILL LOCK IN THE DESIGN FEATURES THAT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN FOR DECADES.  THEY'RE NOT GOING TO WANT TO TEAR DOWN THE BUILDINGS. OF COURSE.  AND IN THE WORDS OF MAYOR BUSSEY, THEY NEED TO DREAM BIG SO I'M HERE TO HELP. I HAVE PICKED SOME OTHER REDEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY LIKE ONE OF THEM WAS JUST APPROVED BY THE CITY OF A DINER AND ONE OF THEM IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH MANY PHASES IN SAINT PAUL THAT HAVE FEATURES THAT I THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE EMULATED.  FIRST UP THIS THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE MACY'S FURNITURE STORE AND A DINER BACK HERE IS FRANCE.  IT HAS TO IT IS MUCH MORE AMBITIOUS AND IT SHOULD BE MORE LIKE WHAT WE EXPECT WE SHOULD EXPECT FROM PAN AMERICAN. IT IS AN EIGHT ACRE SITE THAT MANAGES TO HAVE MORE DENSITY THAN THIS PROPOSAL EVEN THOUGH IT ALSO HAS SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT. IT HAS THREE SEVEN STORY BUILDINGS AND 111 STORY BUILDING. IT CONTAINS 57,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE, 15,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL WHICH IS MUCH LESS BUT IT ALSO INCLUDES 523 APARTMENT UNITS AND 49 SENIOR CONDOS WITH PERCENT OF BOTH TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL AFFORDABLE AT 60% AMI IT SITS ON TOP OF A 33 INCH SANITARY SEWER LINE THAT IS SUPPOSEDLY AT 167% CAPACITY AND IN THIS IS FROM THE THE PLANNING UH THE PROJECT NARRATIVE THAT THE DEVELOPERS SUBMITTED THERE THEY ARE WORKING WITH THE CITY TO SHARE THE COSTS OF THE UPGRADE TO A 42 OR 48 INCH LINE AND THAT IS COINCIDING WITH RELOCATION THAT IS REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT.  AND THEN THE SECOND PART I HAVE IS HIGHLAND BRIDGE IN SAINT PAUL.  HIGHLAND BRIDGE IS A REDEVELOPMENT SAINT PAUL THAT IS A WHOLE DISTRICT THAT IS SLIGHTLY SMALLER THAN PAN AMERICAN AT 135 ACRES. IT SITS ON THE FORMER FORD MOTOR PLANT IN SAINT PAUL ALTHOUGH IT DOESN'T HAVE VOLTAGE LINES OR SEWER CAPACITY ISSUES, IT ALSO HAS ITS OWN ISSUE ABOUT AN OBVIOUSLY A FORMER CAR FACTORY IS A BROWNFIELD AND EVEN THOUGH IT HAS GOTTEN YEARS OF REHABILITATION IS STILL LIMITED BY THE MPCA ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION STARTED IN TWO 2021 THOUGH THE DISTRICT IS FAR FROM COMPLETE. I TOOK THESE PICTURES YESTERDAY YOU SEE THE ONES IN BARCLAY'S OPENED IN 2023 WITH APARTMENTS ON TOP THIS IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION THIS IS A SENIOR LIVING BUILDING. THIS IS THE JUST OPENED 75 APARTMENTS PLUS 60 HOMES FOR WOMEN THROUGH THE M.A., A 60,000 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING.  THIS THEY HAVE TOWNHOMES A REALLY PARK THAT I WAS FLOORED BY IT MY JOB WAS ON THE GROUND WHEN I SAW IT ACTUAL PEDESTRIAN DESIGN HERE IS A RAISED CROSSWALK WITH A PLAZA OVER HERE AND THE BUILDING THAT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION OBVIOUSLY HAS A MUCH MORE LAND TO EXPAND TO AND REAL ACTUAL LANDSCAPING THAT CAN ENJOY A HUGE POND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE A WATERFALL TREES THAT WRAP UP HERE THANK THANK YOU I THINK THAT I THINK THAT WE SHOULD DO THESE MORE WE SHOULD EMULATE THESE IN BLOOMINGTON AND I THAT CROSS ANDERSON KNOWS THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SELL YOU A BAD PRODUCT SO I HOPE THAT YOU REJECT IT.  ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND SINCE WE DO NOT HAVE A QUORUM, I  WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. SO I'M LOOKING FOR A MOTION KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN SO AND YOU CAN SAY SECOND YES YOU CAN TAKE YOUR SECOND. YEAH, SURE. YEAH.  ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR I OPPOSED MOTION PASSES TO ZERO THAT ITEM BE PUSHED VERY QUICKLY. OH, ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.  JUST WANT TO SAY A COUPLE OF THINGS I APPRECIATE MEMBERS OF THE APPLICANT TEAM COMING HERE. SORRY WE COULDN'T TAKE ACTION ON THIS THIS EVENING.  I THINK IN MY FIVE YEARS ON THE COMMISSION IS THE FIRST TIME WE'VE EVER NOT HAD A QUORUM SO UNLUCKY EVENING FOR FOR THE FOLKS THAT DID SHOW UP ALSO MR. CENTENARIO, HAVE YOU BEEN IN DIRECT WITH THE TESTIMONY WE HEARD THIS EVENING WITH THE GENTLEMAN COMMISSIONERS?  I HAVE NOT SPOKEN WITH THE GENTLEMAN WHO ANSWERED MAYBE THIS ISN'T EVEN YOUR APPLICATION. IT IS COMMISSIONER.  BUT I HAVE NOT SPOKEN WITH THE GENTLEMAN WHO WHO SPOKE TODAY. WELL, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO REACH OUT TO CITY STAFF AND WHEN WE PUT THINGS IN WRITING THEY SHOW UP IN OUR PACKET AND THEN THAT GIVES US AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THEM BEFORE WE'RE GETTING READY TO MAKE A DECISION. SO IF YOU DO CHOOSE TO DO THAT THAT'LL OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MORE TIME TO VIEW YOUR TESTIMONY BEFORE WE SEE THIS ITEM AGAIN.  GREAT POINT COMMISSIONER COOK . THANK YOU. YES AND THAT ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED SO GOING TO CONTINUE THAT ITEM TO SEPTEMBER 5TH IT WILL BE BACK HERE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 6 P.M..  THANK YOU.  COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM I BELIEVE CAN REJOIN US WELCOME BACK .  EXCELLENT. ALL RIGHT.  THE NEXT ITEM WE HAVE IS ACTUALLY ITEM FIVE. IT IS ITEM FIVE ON OUR AGENDA IT'S A STUDY ITEMS.  THERE IS NO PUBLIC HEARING. IT IS TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT AUGUST 15TH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SYNOPSIS UNFORTUNATELY WE DO NOT HAVE QUORUM OF THE FOLKS WHO WERE AT THE MEETING AT THAT MEETING TO TAKE ACTION ON THAT SO I'M LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO MOVE THAT ITEM TO THE SEPTEMBER FIFTH MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I'M SURE I MOVE TO MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE DATE PROPOSED SECOND THANK YOU WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I. I OPPOSED MOTION PASSES THREE ZERO THAT ITEM WILL MOVE TO THE SEPTEMBER 5TH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HERE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 6 P.M. ALREADY ITEM SIX IS ALSO A STUDY ITEM AND IT IS THE PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY AND ISSUES UPDATE MR. MERKUR GARDE CHAIR ALBRECHT AND COMMISSIONERS OUR NEXT MEETING IS IN ONE WEEK SEPTEMBER 5TH. ON THAT AGENDA WE NOW HAVE THREE ITEMS THREE DEVELOPMENT ITEMS THE ONE THAT YOU CONTINUED THIS EVENING THE SOUTHTOWN ITEM WILL BE ON THAT AGENDA ALONG WITH PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MEASURE REVISION OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR AN EVENT CENTER THAT'S LOCATED AT 4210 WEST OR SHAKOPEE ROAD AND THEN SECOND OR THIRD PUBLIC HEARING ON THAT AGENDA WOULD BE OUR STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE THAT YOU'VE TALKED ABOUT AND A STUDY SESSION PREVIOUSLY THE NEXT AFTER THAT SEPTEMBER 19TH. WE CURRENTLY HAVE FOUR ITEMS ON THAT AGENDA WE HAVE A TIED THREE PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANTS THAT'S TO SUBDIVIDE TWO ARTS INTO 15 TOWNHOME LOTS AND ONE COMMON LOTS AND ADDRESS THERE 8525 AND 8545 PINE AVENUE SOUTH THIS IS ONE THAT YOU'VE SEEN IN THE PAST AND IT'S TECHNICALLY NOT A REVISION BECAUSE PREVIOUS APPROVAL WAS NOT RECORDED SO IT WILL COME YOU AS A NEW PLANT ITEM TOO AND THAT AGENDA IS A REQUEST BY DISCOUNT TIRE FOR A SMALL ADDITION B A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MAJOR TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS.  ITEM THREE ON THAT AGENDA WOULD BE A PRELIMINARY FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY 54,000 SQUARE FOOT AUTO DEALERSHIP.  THAT'S THE LUTHER KEY FACILITY ON AMERICAN BOULEVARD IN THE PANAMERICAN DISTRICT. AND THEN FINALLY WE HAVE A STUDY ITEM ON THAT AGENDA REGARDING PARK DEDICATION AND PLANNING STANDARDS. THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE COMING UP . ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY ITEMS THAT THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS BART SEEING NONE THAT WE WILL CONCLUDE OUR AUGUST 29TH, 2024 MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THANK YOU