##VIDEO ID:xi1k_BkxMKI## WE GET TO THAT IF WE COULD GET  AN IDENTIFICATION OF THE STAFF  THAT ARE HERE. IF WE COULD MAKE SURE THAT'S ON  THE RECORD FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE  VIEWING. >> I WOULD ASK WE IDENTIFY THE  STAFF ONCE THE AGENDA HAS BEEN  APPROVED. >> MY MOTION IS THAT WE ADD ON  THE AGEA -- TO HAVE IT ADDED,  IT WAS REJECTED THREE TIMES --  TO HAVE THE KILLING OF  ALLISON -- SO WE CAN FILE ON OUR UNANIMOUS MOTION IN NOVEMBER. I UNDERTOOK TO DO SOME FOLLOW-UP THAT'S BEEN COMPLETED. AND WE NEED TO HAVE AN UPDATE ON WHAT THE CCPO DID AND THE  STATUS -- THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO  GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND GET A COPY OF THE MEMO THAT WAS SENT  TO THE CITY COUNCIL SO THAT IS  MY MOTION TO ADD THAT TO THE  AGENDA. IT'S OLD BUSINESS. I ASSUM IT MIGHT GO UNDER THE  REPORT SECTION OF THE AGEN. >> SO YOUR MOTION IS TO ADD IT. IS THERE A SECOND? >> SECOND. >> OKAY, IT'S BEEN MOTIONED AND  SECONDED. ANY DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ADD, I  THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE -- >> COMMISSIONER, THEY CAN'T HEAR YOU. YOUR MICROPHONE. >> I'M SORRY. THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE HERE  TODAY SPEAKING IN SUPPO OF  GETTING JUSTICE FOR ALLISON,  MAKING SURE THAT INDIGENOUS  WOMEN AND ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO  ARE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE ARE  NOT DISMISSED. HER CASE IS SO SIMILAR TO DAVIS  WHO WASOT PROTECTED BY THE  POLICE. HE ENDED UP BEING SHOT AND VERY  SERIOUSLY WOUNDED. THE DIFFERENCE IN THIS CASE IS  ALLISON MUSHAR WAS KILLED. AND THERE'SVIDENCE TO SUPPORT  THAT SHE MAY HAVE WELL BEEN  MURDERED. AND EVEN THOUGH BACK IN APRIL,  MPD PROMISED TO TREAT THE CASE  AS A SUSPICIOUS DEATH, WE  HAVEN'T SEEN ANY RESULTS OF  THAT. SO BACK IN NOVEMBER AFTER YET  AGAIN MORE PUBLIC COMMENT, WE  PASSED A UNANIMOUS MOTION TO  MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE GETTING  INVOLVED. I PERSONALLY SAID I WOULD  UNDERTAKE GETTING A LETTER  WRITTEN.IT TOOK LONGER THAN I T  AND I APOLOGIZED FOR THAT. IT WAS PROVIDED,T WAS SENT TO  THE CHAIR AND I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE AN UPDATE. FIVEINUTES ON THE AGENDA TO  FIND OUT WHAT PROCEEDED, WHAT  WERE THE RESULTS OF THAT TION, AND WHERE WE ARE WITH THAT. >> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?ALL R  DISCUSSION, CLERK, IF YOU WANT  TO CALL THE ROLL ON THE MOTION. >> MADAM CHAIR, TO BE CLEAR,  THIS IS TO ADOPT THE MOTION TO  AMEND THE AGENDA OR ADOPT THE MOTION AS AMENDED? >> AMEND THE AGENDA. >> COMMISSIONER SCHANFIELD. >> I'M VOTING NO. >> COMMISSIONER CLEMENT. >> ABSTAIN. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH-KOOIMAN. >> ABSTAIN. >> COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> ABSTAIN. >> COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER CANADAY. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH. >> YES. >> VICE CHAIR OLSEN. >> ABSTAIN. >> CHAIR REEVES.  ABSTAIN. >> THERE ARE THREE AYES, ONE  NAY, AND FIVE ABSTENTIONS. THAT CARRIES. >> THE MOTION CARRIES. MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. >> IS THAT WHERE YOU NEED A  SECOND? >> A MOTION FIRST TN A SECOND. >> I MOTION TO ADOPT THE AGENDA  AS AMENDED. >> SECOND. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. DO WE HAVE A DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT, CLERK CALL THE ROLL,  PLEASE. >> COMMISSIONER CLEMENT. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH-KOOIMAN. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> AYE. >> COMMIIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER CANADAY. >> AY >> COMMISSIONER SMITH. >> AYE. >> VICE CHAIR OLSEN. >> AYE. >> CHAIR REEVES. >> AYE. >> THERE ARE NINE AYES. >> THANK YOU. THE AYES HAVE IT AND THE AGENDA  IS ADOPTED. NEXT WE HAVE THE ACCEPTANCE OF  THE MINUTES FROM OUR JANUARY 6TH MEETING. MAY I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO ACCEPT THAT SET OF MINUTES? >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION  AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL THE ROLL. >> I HAD ONE COMMENT. I JUST WANTED TO THANK THE STAFF AND MAKE SURE THAT -- AND I SEE  THAT IN THE MINUTES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. MR. CLERK. >> COMMISSIONER SCHANFIELD. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER CLEMENT. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH-KOOIMAN. >> YES.>> COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER CANADAY. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH. >> AYE. >> VICE CHAIR OLSEN. >> YES. >> CHAIR REEVES. >> YES. >> THANK YOU. THERE ARE NINE AYES. >> THE AYES HAVE IT AND THE MIN. NEXT IS THE ORDER OF PUBLIC  COMMENTS. WE'LL OPEN THE FLOOR TO ANY  COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES TO ADDRESS  THE COMMISSION. WE'LL BE TAKING SPEAKERS IN THE  ORDER IN WHICH THEY REGISTERED. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE  COMMISSION TONIGHT AND HAVEN'T  ALREADY DONE SO, YOU CAN  REGISTER WITH TH CLERK AT THE  SITE OF THE DAIS. IF ANY CITIZEN HAS PRINTED  MATERIALS, PLEASE GIVE THOSE TO  THE CITY CLERK. WE INVITE FOLKS TO GE WRITTEN  COMMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE  PUBLIC COMMENT AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO SPEAKINGT TONIGHT'S COMMENT SESSION. EACH SPEAKER WILL BE GIVEN TWO  MINUTES TO ADDRESS THE  COMMISSION TONIGHT. WE HAVE A TIMER RIGHT HERE AT  THE DAIS TO ASSIST SPEAKERS IN  MONITORING THEIR USE OF TIME. WITH THAT, OUR FIRST SPEAKER  TONIGHT IS MARK ANDERSON. >> MADAM CHAIR, A POINT OF  ORDER. COULD WE GET THE STAFF  IDENTIFICATION AND  INTRODUCTIONS. >> MY APOLOGIES. IF WE CAN GET THE STAFF TO  IDENTIFY THEMSELVES SO PEOPLE  KNOW WHO'S HERE SO IF THE STAFF  DON'T MIND COMING UP TO  INTRODUCE THEMSELVES SO EVERYONE KNOWS WHO'S HERE. THANK YOU. MR. ANDERSON, IF I CAN HAVE YOU  STEP TO THE SIDE FOR JUST ONE  MOMENT. >> OFFICE OF POLICE CONDUCT  REVIEW. >> THANK YOU. >> LIEUTENANT BRYCE ROBINSON. MINNEAPOLIS POLICE  IMPLEMENTATION UNIT. >> GAVIN WOODLAND, HEALTH AND  WELLNESS, SME IMPLEMENTATION  UNIT. >> PART OF THE IMPLEMENTATION  UNIT AS A SENIOR PROJECT  MANAGER. >> CAPTAIN CARLISLE, MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT,  IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, MANAGER OF  COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT. >> HI EVERYONE, MPD INTERNAL  AFFAIRS CASE MANAGER. . >> HELLO, KRISTEN ANDERSON, CITY ATTORNEY. >> ADAM SAMANSKY, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR. ANDERSON, FOR  YOUR PATIENCE. >> HELLO. TODAY WE ARE HERE TO DISCUSS THE CASE OF ALLISON. HER ORY IS ONE OF HEARTBREAK,  NEGLECT, AND A FIGHT FOR  JUSTICE. AS A CHERISHED MEMBER OF THE  INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY, ALLISON'S  LIFEAS TRAGICALLY CUT SHORT  AND THE RESPONSE FROM THE  MINNPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT  HAS LEFT HER FAMILY AND LOVED  ONES GRAPPLING WITH UNANSWERED  QUESTIONS. ALLISON ENDURED A TUMULTUOUS AND ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIP WITHER ON AGAIN OFF AGAIN BOYFRIEND WHICH  LED TO SEVERAL CALLS FROM LAW  ENFORCEMENT. DESPITE HER DECEMBER PRATE PLEAS FOR HELP, THE SYSTEM REPEATEDLY  FAIL HER FROM DOCUMENTED PHONE CALLS TO RESTRAINING ORDERS, HER CRIES FOR PROTECTION WERE  IGNORED AND NO MEANINGFUL ACTION WAS TAKEN. TONIGHT YOU'LL HEAR ABOUT THE TIMELINE OF HER CASE, THE LACK  OF A RESPONSE FROM THE  MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT,  THE SIMILARITIES OF THIS CASE TO THE SHOOTING AND THE WORK THAT  HAS BEENONE LEADING UP TO THIS MOMENT. ON JULY 30, 2022, ALLISON FIRST  CONTACTED MPD ABOUT THE ABUSE  SHE WAS FACI. A REPORT WAS MADE WITH OFFICER  DUNCAN OF MPD DETAILING THE  ABUSE AND TORTURE THAT TOOK  PLACE THE WEEK BEFORE. THE FOLLOWING IS AN EXCERPT FROM THAT REPORT. SHE STATED LAST NIGHT AROUND  1300OURS BECAME ANGRY FROM A  PHONE CALL RECEIVED FROM AN  UNKNOWN NUMBER. HE PROCEEDED TO GRAB HER PHONE  AND THREW IT ACROSS HER THEN HIT HER IN THE HEAD WITH A CLOSED  FIST. HE GRABBED THE PHONE AND STARTED TO CALL THE NUMBERS ON THE  PHONE. EVERY TIME A MALE ANSWERED THE  PHONE, HE WOULD HIT HER AGAIN. HE HIT HER MORE THAN 25 TIMES. SHE MADE HERSELF SOME SOUP. FROST PROCEED TO GRAB THE SOUP AND DUMP IT OVER HER HEAD. HE PROCEEDED TO GRAB HER BY THE  HAIR AND GRAB HER AND PULL HER  INTO THE BATHROOM. WHILE IN THE BATHROOM, FROST  USED A CHAIN AND A METAL WIRE  HANGERO TIE HER UP. >> THANK YOU, JANELLE BROWN AND  I APOLOGIZE IF I SAID YOUR NAME  WRONG. >> USED A CHAIN AND METAL WIRE  TO TIE HER UP. FROST USED PLIERS TO SECURE THE  CHAIN AND WIRES SO THAT SHE  WOULD NOT GET OUT. FROST PROCEEDED TO KICK HER IN  THE CHEST AREA. FROST SAIDHAT IF SHE MADE A  SOUND, HE WOULD CONTINUE HITTING HER. SHE STATED THAT AFTER TYING HER  UP AND HITTING HER, HE LEFT HER  CHAINED IN THE BATHROOM WHILE HE LEFT. SHE DID NOT SAY HOW LONG SHE WAS CHAINED UP BUT STATED THAT HE  LEFT FOR A WHILE. ANOTHER INCIDENT ON NOVEMBER 19, 2022, REPORTED TO OFFICER DUNCAN THE NEXT DAY. THE FOLLOWING IS FROM THAT  REPORT. SHE STATED THAT ON 11/19/22, SHE WENT TO THE STORE AND WAS GONE LITTLE LONGER THAN 30 MINUTES. SHE RETURNED HOME AND HETARTED YELLING AT HER AROUND 11:30 A.M. ON WHY SHE TOOKO LONG BRINGING UP COMMENTS THAT SHE WAS WITH  ANOTHER GUY. THEY STARTED TO ARGUE ABOUT  THIS. SHE THEN STATED THAT HE BACKED  HER INTO A CORNER OF HER BEDROOM ON THE BED. FROST PROCEEDED TO HIT HER WITH A CLOSED FIST IN HER FACE ON THE BACK OF HER HEAD STATING TELL ME A NAME. SHE STATED THAT SHE GAVE HIM A  FAKE NAME SO HE WOULD STOP  HITTING HER. SHE STATED THAT THE ASSAULT  STOPPED FOR ABOUT AN HOUR AND  THEN HE STARTED ASSAULTING HER  AGAIN. SHE STATED THAT FROST MADE HER  TAKE OFF ALL HER CLOTHES AND  WHILE SHE WAS LAYING ON HER  RIGHT SIDE ON THE BED COVERING  HER FACE WITH HER HEAD AND ARMS  TO PROTECT HERSELF FROM GETTING  HIT IN THE FACE, SHE STATED THAT HE PROCEEDED TO STOMP ON HER  CAUSING BRUISING TO HER ARMS AND LEGS. SHE STATED THAT SOMETIME DURING  THE ASSAULT, HE ZIP TIED HER  WRISTS TOGETHER. SHE STATED THAT SHE WANTED TO  LEAVE BUT COULDN'T AND DIDN'T  TRY BECAUSE IT WOULD ONLY MAKE  THINGS WORSE. SHE ALSO STATED THAT HE HELD A  RAZOR BLADE TO HER LIPS SAYING I SHOULD CUT YOUR LIPS OFF. SOMETIME DURING THE ASSAULT HE THREATENED TO KILL HER SAYING I  SHOULD KILL YOU AND THROW YOU IN THE RIVER WHERE NOBODY CAN FIND  YOU. >> NEXT UP, TIFFANY JACKSON. >> HE STATED THAT SHE WAS VERY  SCARED AND IN FEAR OFER LIFE  DURING THE ASSAULT. SHE HAS STATED THAT FROST HAS  BEEN ABUSING HER FOR A WHILE  NOW. SHE STATED TT THE ASSAULT  OCCURRED OFF AND ON FROM 11:30  HOUR TO 1:30 HOUR. SHE SAID THAT BELIEVED HE WAS ON METH. AND IT WAS THIS MEETING WITH  OFFICER DUNCAN THAT ALLISON  INQUIRED ABOUT OBTAINING AN  ORDER FOR PROTECTION. IT WAS ALSO AT THIS TIME THAT  OFFICER DUNCAN -- ON JUNE 28,  20, THE FOLLOWING WAS  REPORTED. ALLISON REPORTED THAT SHE WAS  SITTING IN THE FRONT PASSENGER  SEAT OF CHARLES' VEHICLE DRIVING TO A SCRAPYARD IN WHICH CHARLES  WAS DRIVING. HEECAME UPSET WITH ALLISON AND BEGAN ASSAULTING HER INSIDE THE  VEHICLE. ALLISON REPORTED THAT SHE WAS  HIT ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE HEAD WITH THE BACKHAND OF CHARLES'  RIGHT CLOSED FIST. WHEN SHE LET GO OF HER HAIR TO  PUNCH HER IN THE BACK OF THE  HEAD, ALLISON REPORTED THAT SHE  WAS PUNCHED IN THE LEFT EYE  AREA. ALLISON'S ATTEMPT TO ESCAPE WITH NO SUCCESS. ALLISON REINED IN THE VEHICLE  WITH CHARLES WHO CONTINUED TO  DRIVE TO K&K SCRAPYARD. CHARLES STATED THAT HE WAS GOING TO KILL YOU AND THROW YOUR BODY  IN THE RIVER. ALLISON FILED FOR AN ORDER OF  PROTECTION ON OCTOBER 23, 2023,  AND AGAIN ON NOVEMBER 2, 2023. TENAYS LATER NEITH OF  THESE --  >> NEXT UP IS ADENE. >> ALLISON FILED FOR AN ORDER OF PROTECTION ON OCTOBER 22 OF 23  AND AGAIN ON NOVEMBER 10, OF 23. NEITHER OF THESE WERE SERVED. HAD THEY BEEN IT'S POSSIBLE  ALLISON WOULD STILL BE ALIVE  TODAY. OCTOBER 13, OFFICERAK  RESPONDED TO A 911 CALL FROM  ALLISON. THE CALL NOTES WER AS FOLLOW. UPON MY ARRIVAL, MY PARTNER AND  I MADE CONTACT WITH THE  CARETAKER FOR ENTRY. WE WENT UP TO APARTMENT 202 TO  SPEAK WITH THE VICTIM.THE VICTI  ALLISON. ALLISON HAD STATED THAT WHAT  OCRRED IN HER APARTMENT WAS  APPROXIMATELY 10-15 MINUTES AGO. SHE STATED HER BOYFRIEND HAD  KNOCKED DOWN HER DOOR AND  ALLISON HAD LET HIM INTO HER  APARTMENT. ALLISON IDENTIFIED HER BOYFRIEND AS CHARLES FROST. WHEN CHARLES ENTERED ALLISON'S  APARTMENT, HE STARTED TO CLAIM  THAT ALLISON HAD BEEN SLEEPING  WITH OTHER MEN. ALLISON STATED THAT SHE WAS NOT  AND NOT SEEN CHARLES IN A COUPLE OF DAYS. CHARLES THEN HIT AISON ON HER  RIGHT TEMPLE WITH A CLOSED FIST. ALLISON THEN ATTEMPTED TO LEAVE  HER APARTMENT. THAT'S WHEN CHARLES GOT BEHIND  HER AND PUT HIS ARM AROUND HER  NECK FROM BEHIND HER AND STATED  THAT YOU AREN'T LEAVING ME. AFTER HEARING THIS, I ASKED  ALLISON IF SHE WOULD LIKEO BE  SEEN BY EMS. AND SHE DECLINED. ALLISON WAS ABLE TO GET AWAY  FROM CHARLES AND MADE IT TO  APARTMENT 202 AND THEY CALLED  911. I ASKED ALLISON IF SHE HAD GONE  CONSCIOUS AT ALL DURING THE  INCIDENT. AND SHE STATED THAT SHE DID NOT. I ALSO ASKED IF CHARL HAD  SQUEEZED HER NECK WHEN HE HAD  HIS ARMS AROUND HER AND SHE  STATED THAT HE DID NOT. I ASKED ALLISON IF SHE FELT  DIZZY OR NAUSEOUS, SHE STATED  NO. I ASKED ALLISON IF SHE HAD --  SHE STATED NO. ACCORDING TO BOTH 911 CALLS MADE TO THE MPD STATING SHE HAD BEEN  CHOKED. >> NEXT UP WE HAVE MUHAMMAD. >> ACCORDING TO BOTH THE 911  CALL MADE TO MPD STATING THAT  SHE WAS BEING CHOKED AND THE  CALL MADE BY THE CARETAKER,  THERE WAS VISIBLE RED MARKS ON  ALLISON'S NECK. THEIR RECORD DOESN'T CORRELATE  WITH THE CALL MADE THAT NIGHT  DUE TO THE SEVERITY OF THE CALL. U ONLY HAVE UNTIL MIDNIGHT ON  FEBRUARY TO DO SO ACCORDING TO  MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION  6292341. ON FEBRUARY 17, 2024, ALLISON  ARRIVED HOME SHORTLY AFTER  MIDNIGHT, SHE HEARD SOMEONE  INSIDE. SHE WENT DOWNSTAIRS AND THAT'S  WHEN THEY CALLED 911. AT 12:36 A.M. THE SAME TWO  OFFICERS THAT CAME ON  FEBRUARY 13TH ARRIVED AT THE  SCENE. IT WAS THEN THAT THEY FOUND HIM  IN HER APARTMENT AND TOLD HIM TO LEAVE. THEY REPORTED HE LEFT WITHOUT  INCIDENT. THE OFFICER LET HIM GO CITING THAT IT WAS BEYOND THE 72 HOUR  STATUTE FOR PROBABLE CAUSE ARRE. LATER THAT DAY AT 5:00 P.M.,  ALLISON'S SISTER NICOLE TEXTED  HER. ALLISON RESPONDED I WANNA BUT  I'M SCARED TO LEAVE. CHARLES WAS INSIDE MY APARTMENT  LAST NIGHT, CALLED THE COPS AND  THEY ESCORTED HIM OUT. NOW HE TEXTED EARLIER IF I'M  GOING TO G HIM ARRESTED, HE'S  GOING TO GO TO JAIL FOR  SOMETHING GOOD SO I BETTER WATCH MY BACK. NICOLE THEN ASKED WHY THE POLICE DIDN'T ARREST HIM. ALLISON REPORTED BECAUSE T  PROTECTION ORDER WAS DONE AFTER  TEN DAYS. HE MUST BE SITTING SOMEWHERE IN  A STOLEN CAR WATCHING MY HOUSE  BECAUSE I ORDERED A PIZZA AND HE TEXTED ME AND SAID I'M LUCKY I  WAS -- >> TIME'S UP. THANK YOU. IS IT BOSH? APOLOGIES FOR THE  MISPRONUNCIATION. >> HE MUST BE SITTING SOMEWHERE  IN A STOLEN CAR WATCHING MY  HOUSE BECAUSE I ORDERED A PIZZA  AND HE TEXTED ME AND SAID I'M  LUCKY IT WAS AN F-ING DELIVERY  GUY. NICOLE THEN MADE ALLISON PROMISE SHE WOULD KEEPESSAGING HER  BACK. ALLISON REPLIED IF I DON'T, KNOW HE GOT ME FOR REAL THIS TIME. FOUR DAYS LATER ON FEBRUARY 22,  2024, ALLISON WAS FOUND DECEASED AFTER A WELFARE CHECK AROUND  2:30 P.M. FEBRUARY 22nd. AT THAT POINT MINNEAPOLIS PD  TOLD THE NEIGHBORS IT WAS A  SUSPICIOUS DEATH. AN AUTOPSY CONDUCTED BY THE  HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL  EXAMINER'S OFFICE FOUND A  SUBDERMAL HEMATOMA ON THE LEFT  SIDE OF HER HEAD. RESIDUAL AND NONLETHAL LEVELS OF METH PRODUCTS IN HER SYSTEM AND  PRESUMED THAT SHE HAD PASSED ON  THE 17th BASEDN THE  DECOMPOSITION OF HER BODY. STILL TO THIS DAY MPD DID NOT  PRESER ANY DATA OR VIDEO  RECORDINGS FROM SURROUNDING  BUSINESSES TO INVESTIGATE  WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS IN A  STOLEN CAR STALKINGLLISON THE  DAY SHE DIED. NOR DID THEY LOCATE HER PHONE IN HER APARTMENT ON FEBRUARY 22nd  WHEN THEY FOUND HER DECEASED. NOR DID THEY PING THE  EREABOUTS, SOME OF THE  SIMPLEST EVIDENCE IN GATHERING  SOME OF THE SIMPLES EVIDENCE  FOR HER HOMICIDE CASE. ON MARCH 1ST, SERGEANT HYER OF  THE HOMICIDE DETECTIVE WHO WAS  ASSIED TO THE CASE CONTACTED  JANA WILLIAMS, ALLISON'S AUNT  ABOUT THE CASE. IN THAT CONVERSATION,  MS. WILLIAMS ASKED THE SERGEANT  IF HE PULLED THE VIDEO CAMERA  COVERAGE IN THE CAMERA  APARTMENTS WHERE ALLISON  RESIDED. HIS RESPONSE, WHY WOULD I DO  THAT? MS. WILLIAMS ALSO ASKED IF THEY  FOUND HER PHONE. THE SERGEANT RESPONDED THEY DID  NOT HAVE IT IN THEIR POSSESSION. THE FAMILY ALONG WITH THE  INDIGENOUS PROTECTOR MOVEMENT,   NNIR'S OFFICE MET WITH COMMANDER ZIMMERMAN AND CHIEF GOODYEAR IN  MID-MARCH. IN THAT MEETING, ZIMMERMAN AND  THE CHIEF ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY RECEIVED THE 911 CALLROM  SOMEONE AT THE HOMELESS  ENCAMPMENT -- >> THANK YOU. DANIELLE. >> CHUCK WAS TELLING PEOPLE HE  THOUGHT HE HIT HER TOO HARD THIS TIME AND KILLED HER. ALONG WITH ACKNOWLEDGING THEY  DID NOT HAVE HER PHONE AND HAD  NO IDE WHERE IT WAS. THE FAMILY LEARNED SOMETIME  SHORTLY AFTER THAT, ALLISON'S  PHONE WAS IN FACT TAKEN AWAY BY  CHUCK FROST, BY A FEW ANONYMOUS  WOMEN WHEN HE WAS TELLING THEM  THAT HE THOUGHT LAW ENFORCEMENT  WAS MONITORING IT. THAT PHONE WAS TURNED IN  SOMETIME AFTER. MEANWHILE THE TOXICOLOGY REPORT  CAME BACK LISTING THE CAUSE OF  DEATH AS SUBDERMAL HEMATOMA. MANNER OF DEATH UNDETERMINED. IN NO WAY WAS AN OVERDOSE  DETERMINED TO BE A CAUSE OF  DEATH. THE MPD SENT ALLISON'S CASE TO  THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN  EARLY JUNE 2024. ON AUGUST 21ST, THE FAMILY ALONG WITH INDIGENOUS PROTECTOR  MOVEMENT MET WITH THE HENNEPIN  COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. IN THAT MEETING, THEY STATED --  COULDN'T HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY HER DRUG USE. ACCORDING TO THE COUNTYEDICAL  EXAMINER AND A DOCTOR AND  EVERYONE ELSE IN THE MEDICAL  FIELD, THAT THAT IS A MEDICAL  IMPOSSIBILITY. MS. LUTZLSO ACKNOWLEDGED THAT  MPD DID AN INCOMPLETE JOB OF  INVESTIGATING THE CASE AND  THEREFORE DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH  EVIDENCE TO MAKE A CASE AGAINST  CHARLES FROST TO PROVE BEYOND A  REASONABLE DOUBT. THE CASE OF ALLISON IS  REMARKABLY SIMILAR TO THE CASE  OF DAVIS WHO AS YOU KNOW WAS  SHOT AND HOSPITALIZED LAST  OCTOBEIN A NEAR FATAL HATE  CRIME AND I CURRENTLY THE  SUBJECT OF AN AFTER ACTION  REVIEW BEING CONDUCTED BY THE  CITY AUDITOR. THE RECORD IS CLEAR RIGHT FROM  HIS EMAILS TO THE MPD, THAT HE  WAS BEING STALKED, HARASSED, AND THREATENED. ON OCTOBER 17TH -- >> LIZZY PALMER. >> ON OCTOBER 17, 2024, 5 DAYS  BEFORE -- WAS SHOT. THIS IS ABOUT THE FOURTH OR  FIFTH INCIDENT FOR A WEAPON I  HAVE REPORTED AND PROBABLY THE  30TH TIME I'VE CALLED 911. IT CONTINUES TO GET MORE AND  MORE VIOLENT BY THE DAY. DESPITE MULTIPLE WARRANTS, THEY  STILL LET HIM GO. WHAT'S THE POINT OF BEING --  OCTOBER 24TH A DAY AFTER BEING  SHOT, BULLETS AND TUBES IN HIS  CHEST, DO YOU MIND EXPLAINING TO ME WHY OFFICERS AT YOUR COMMAND  LET HIM GO THE LAST TIME HE  ATTACKED WITH A SHOVEL? YOU BLAMED ME FOR THE ENTIRE  SERIES OF INCIDENTS AND PLACED  THE SAFETY OF YOUR SUBORDINATES  OVER MY LIFE THEY REACHED OUT TO MPD ON  NUMEROUS OCCASIONS ONLY FOR NO  ACTION TO BE TAKEN TO PROTECT  THEIR LIVES. THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME  ALLISON'S CASE HAS BEEN THE  SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMNT FOR  THE CCPO. ON AUGUST 7,2023, THE CCPO  RECEIVED A PRESENTATION FROM  FOUNDER AND EXECUTIVE  DIRECTOR -- AN INSTITUTIONAL  ANALYSIS OF POLICE RESPONSE TO  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. THE REPORTS ARE SCATHING AND  DOWNRIGHT SHAMEFUL TO MINNESOTA  AND SPECIFICALLY RESIDENTS OF  MINNEAPOLIS. NO PLACE WAS AS BAD A THE MPD. ON AUGUST 5TH, SPOKE DURING PUBLIC COMMENT AND FOUND  SIMILARITIES FOUND IN MPD'S LACK OF RESPON. ON NOVEMBER 15TH, I SPOKE  REQUESTING THA IT BE BROUGHT TO THE PUBLIC EYE DETAILING MANY OF THE SAME FACTS DISCUSSED HERE. THIS RESULTED IN -- REQUESTING  THE AUDITOR INVESTIGATE THE  DEATH AS PART OF THE AFTER ACTI. >> THANK YOU. JANA WILLIAMS. >> TONIGHT YOU'VE HEARD THE  TRAGIC TIMELINE OF HER CASE, THE LACK OF RESPONSE OF MINNEAPOLIS  PD, SIMILARITIES OF THIS CASE TO THE SHOOTING. AND THE WORK THAT HAS BEEN DONE  LEADING UP TO THIS MOMENT. MINNEAPOLIS PDANTED TO SWEEP  ALLISON'S CASE UNDER THE RUG. IF SHE WASN'T AN INDIGENOUS  WOMAN, HER PHONE WOULD HAVE BEEN FOD AND THE EVIDENCE FROM THE  SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND THE  EVIDENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN  PRESERVED, INSTEAD IT WAS NOT. THE IMPLICIT BIAS IS APPARENT IN HOW THEY TREATED HER DEATH. SO I LEAVE YOU WITH THIS, WE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF LOSING OUR  FRIENDS AND FAMILY. BLACK, BROWN, AND INDIGENOUS  COMMUNITIES SUFFER AND THE  BURDENS THEY BEAR ARE IMMENSE. IT IS A PAIN THAT MOST DO NOT  FEEL A BURDEN THAT MOST CANNOT  CARRY. EVEN SO, WE HAVE ALL LOST SO  MUCH AND SO MANY, WE WILL NOT  GIVE UP. OUR GATHERING HERE TODAY SPEAKS  TO THE POWER OF THE PEOPLE. ALL OF OUR COMMUNITIES COMING  TOGETHER FOR A JUST CAUSE. UNDERSTAND THIS, WE WILL  CONTINUE TO FIGHT UNTIL WE GET  JUSTICE FOR ALL OF OUR MISSING,  MURDERED, AND INDIGENOUS  RELATIVES. WE WILL CONTINUE UNTIL WE HAVE  JUSTICE FORALLISON. JUSTICE IS OUR DEMAND. NO PEACE ON STOLEN LAND. JUSTICE IS OUR DEMAND. NO PEACE ON STOLEN LAND. JUSTICE IS OUR DEMAND NO PEACE ON STOLEN LAND. JUSTICE FOR ALLISON. >> NEXT UP WE HAVE LYNN  ANRSON. >> MADAM CHAIR, COMMISSIONERS, I AM LYNN ANDERSON, BOARD CHAIR OF GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN, A  NONPROFIT BASED IN WARD 3. WE ARE LASER FOCUSEDN ENDING  VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN THROUGH  LEGAL REFORM AND SYSTEMIC  CHANGE. ONE IN THREE WOMEN EXPERIENCE  VIOLENCE OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE I. NATIVE WOMEN AND WOMEN OF COLOR  PERIENCE THIS VIOLENCE  DISPROPORTIONATELY AND 2 TO 3  TIMES MORE THAN WHITE WOMEN. 87% OF WOMEN ARE KILLED BY A MAN THEY KNOW, AN INTIMATE PARTNER,  OR A MALE RELATIVE. MOST OF THESE MURDERS OCCUR IN  THE HOME OR PRIVATE SPACES. WE'RE HERE TODAY IN SUPPORT OF  JANA WILLIAMS' AUDIT REQUEST AND CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT FOR HER  NIECE ALLISON. ALLISON WAS KILLED LAST FEBRUARY WHICH WAS EIGHT MONTHS AFTER WE, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE  MINNEAPOLIS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE  WORKINGGROUP, RELEASED OUR  ASSESSMENT OF THE MINNEAPOLIS  POLICE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE TO  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. AS PART OF THIS ASSESSMENT, WE  INTERVIEWED SURVIVORS WHOSE  EXPERIENCES WERE ROUTINELY  DISMISSED OR MINIMIZED, NO  POLICE REPORTS FILED, AND VIOLA  PROTECTION WERE NOT FOLLOWED UP  ON, PUTTING WOMEN AT EVEN  GREATER RISK FOR THEIR SAFETY. THIS IS ULTIMATELY WHAT LED TO  THDEATH OF ALLISON. GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN MADE  SEVEN MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR  IMPROVEMENT FOR MPD POLICY AND  PRACTICE. HAD THE RECOMMENDATIONS OFFERED  IN OUR REPORT BEEN FOLLOWED,  ALLISON WOULD STILL BE ALIVE. IT'S T LATE FOR ALLISON. BUT IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO PROTEC  COMMUNITY EXPERIENCING DOMESTIC  VIOLENCE. SO WE AGAIN IMPLORE YOU TO DO  THE RIGHT THING AND A ON THE  RECOMMENDATIONS IN OUR  ASSESSMENT. >> THANK YOU.>> THANK YOU. >> NEXT UP WE HAVE LACROUX  DUBOIS. >> GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS LAUREN DUBOIS. AND I AM HERE AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE  MADELINE KINGSBURYTART UP  FOUNDATION. MY FRIEND MADELINE KINGSBY WAS MURDERED IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN 2023 BY THE FATHER OF HER  CHILDREN. DURINGTIME, ALLISON'S AUNT JANA  REACHED OUT TO ME IN HOMES WE  COULD SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT HER  CASE. MADDIE RECEIVED JUSTICE THIS  PAST DECEMBER OF 2024. WHILE I WAS NOT ABLE TO PUT  MYSELF INTO MADELINE'S CASE DUE  TO SEQUESTRATION, I DECIDED TO  DELVE IN AND FAMILIARIZE MYSELF  WITH ALLISON'S CASE. I WAS APPALLED TO FIND THE  DISCREPANCIES IN THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT. I WAS APPALLED TO SEE THE NUMBER OF TIMES ALLISON HAD CALLED AND  ASKED FOR HELP. THE DOCUMENTATION AND THE PROOF  THAT THERE HAD BEEN VIOLENCE  AGAINST HER. WE'RE VERY LUCKY WITH MADELINE'S CASE THAT THE COUNTY PD ACTED  SWIFTLY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF  MADELINE BEING REPORTED MISSING  UNDER SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES,  THEY HAD POLICE CREWS IN THE  RIVER, IN THE WOODS, THEY WERE  OBTAINING VIDEO SURVEILLANCE,  THEY WERE OBTAINING INTERVIEWS  FROM NEIGHBORS, DOORBELL CAMS IN THE COMMUNITY. WHEN LOOKING AT ALLISON'S CASE,  NONE OF THAT WAS DONE.AND I CAN  WHITE SUBURBAN WOMAN CAN CATCH  THE EYE AND GAIN PUBLIC  TRACTION, BUT THE LIFE OF AN  INDIGENOUS WOMAN FACING THE SAME STRUGGLEDOES NOT. WHY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IS  ABLE TO LOOK PAST ALL OF THE  REPORTS THAT ALLISON MADE. AT THE MADELINE KINGSBURY  FOUNTION, WE BELIEVE THAT NO  VICTIM IS LESS IMPORTANT THAN  MADELINE. AND WE BELIEVE THAT ALL VOICES  SHOULD AND WILL BE HEARD. I'M ASKING YOU TO PLEASE ACT  WITH URGENCY ON ALLISON'S CASE  SO IT GOES INTO THE PROPER HAND  SO THAT SHE CAN TOO RECEIVEHE  JUSTICE SHE SO DESERVES.THANK Y. >> NEXT UP WE HAVE TERESA DURST. >> HELLO AND GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS TERESA DURST. I RESIDE AT 756 NORTH 4TH  STREET. APARTMENT NUMBER 202. AT THE TIME I WAS THE CARETAKER  WHO WAS QUITE POSSIBLY ONE OF  THE LAST PEOPLE ALLISON SAW AND  COMMUNICATED WITH. I WAS THE CARETAKER THERE FROM  FEBRUARY 2, 2022, UP TO 11/29 OF THIS LAST YEAR, 2024. I'M GOING TO -- IAVE MANY  EXPERIENCES BETWEEN HER AND  MYSELF AS A CARETAKER AS WELL AS A NEIGHBOR. WHEN I WAS A CARETAKER I WAS  ABLE TO HELP HER, I ESCORTED HER TO OUR OFFICE TO HAVE HER FILL  OUT T PAPERWORK TO GET  INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT SHE  NEEDED TO DO TO GET HER KEY  CHANGED. BACK IN DECEMBER OF 2023, WE DID THAT. WE GOT SOME KEYS MADE. BUT THEN BACK IN FEBRUARY I'M  GOING TO SAY, WE NEEDED TO GET  IT DONE AGAIN. SHE NEEDED MOR KEYS. SHE COULDN'T ALWAYS AFFORD TO  PAY THE PRICE OF THE KEY  CHANGES, THE LOCK CHANGES. AS A NEIGHBOR, I GAVE HER  PERMISSION TO COME TO MY DOOR  WHEN SHE NEEDED HELP. THE FIRST TIME I INTRODUCED  MYSELF TO GIVEER THAT  PERMISSION WAS AS SHE WAS  SITTING OUT ON THE FRONT STEPS  WAITING FOR THE POLICE TO  ARRIVE. SHE TOLD ME WHAT HAD HAPPENED AND I SAID ANYTIME. ANYTIME YOU NEED TO GET AWAY,  COME KNOCK ON MY DOOR. I WAS THERE TO ANSWER THE DOOR  ON THE 13th OFEBRUARY 2024. THIS IS TOUGH BECAUSE I HAVE  FORMATION. THIS CASE CANNOT GET CLOSED. THEY DON'T HAVE ALL OF THE  INFORMATION. >> COULD I HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL  COMMENTS BE WRITTEN COMMENTS. >> I CAN GIVE A STATEMENT TO  INDIVIDUALS AT ANYTIME. PLEASE DO NOT LET GO OF THIS. >> BONJOUR. I'M THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF  THE INDIGENOUS PROTECTION  MOVEMENT. I GREW UP WITH ALLISON IN SOUTH  MINNEAPOLIS. IN THE LITTLE EARTH HOUSING  PROJECT. I REMEMBER GOING TO HERHOME,  SINGING WITH HER STEPFATHER ON  THE DRUM. WHEN I HEARD OF THE PASSING OF  ALLISON,T BROKE MY HEART. I WAS OUT OF TOWN AND I MADE IT  BACK, WENT TO HER RESIDENCE  DOWNTOWN AND I HEARD HER SON  SPEAK AND HE WAS RECENTLY  INCARCERATED AND HE'S OUT NOW  AND HE'S TRYING TO GET HIS LIFE  TOGETHER AND NOW HE HAS TO DEAL  WITH HIS MOTHER BEING KILLED IN  A HORRIFIC W. AND HE HAS KIDS. ALLISON'S GRANDKIDS. AND ALL THEY WANT IS ANSWERS. THAT'S ALL THEY WANT IS ANSWERS. THEY WANT THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE TO BE TRANSPARENT AND LET THEM  KNOW SOMETHING, WHAT'S GOING ON  WITH THEIR MOTHER'S CASE. AND HE GETS NOTHING. SO I'M HERE TO STAND WITH THE  FAMILY. I'M HERE TO STAND WITH MY  COMMUNITY AND WE WANT ANERS. >> NEXT UP WE HAVE AARON  JOHNSON. AARON JOHNSON. >> HELLO, MY NAME IS AARON  HNSON. I'M FROM THE DOCUMENTARY ABOUT  THE ENCAMPMENTS IN MINNEAPOLIS. MY FILM IS REALLY FOCUSED ON --  LAST FEBRUARY, WE WERE STARTING  GETTING A LOT OF WEIRDOS AND  THREATS AT THAT ENCAMPMENT. IT'S PREDOMINANTLY INDIGENOUS. SOMEBODY BURNEDOWN THE  PORT-A-POTTY. THIS WAS REPORTED TO THE POLICE  AT THE 3rd PRECINCT. ABOUT THREE DAYS LATER, THE  ENTIRE CAMP BURNED DOWN. BUT BASICALLY, I PTED A VIDEO  ONLINE. THERE WAS A SUSPICIOUS PERSON, A SUSPECT, THERE WERE SUPPOSEDLY  GASOLINE CANISTERS AROUND. PLEASE REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE  IT. EXCUSE ME. LAST MONTH, I THINK THERE WAS  FOUR ENCAMPMENTS THAT BURNED  DOWN LAST MONTH AND TWO BURNED  DOWN 15 MINUTES APART. I PERSONALLY FOUND EMPTY  GASOLINE CANS AT THAT. I DOCUMENTED ALL OF THIS, I  REPORTED IT TO THE 3rd PRECINCT. NOTHING. DID NOT INVESTIGATE ANYTHING. THE ENCAMPMENT FIRE I WAS IN,  THERE WAS 50 OF US IN THER LUCKILY NO ONE DIED. THOSE LAST TWO, THERE WAS  BETWEEN 190 TO 230 PEOPLE  DISPLACED. ALL PEOPLE THAT WERE IN THESE  ENCAMPMENTS WHEN THEY BURNED  DOWN. SO THAT'S POTENTIALLY 230 COUNTS  ATTEMPTED MURDER. THE POLICE JUST, THEY DON'T  CARE. THEY DIDN'T EN SEARCH FOR  THESE GASOLINE CANISTERS THAT I  FOUND THE NEXT DAY WHILE THE  CAMP WAS BEING BULLDOZED. THE CITY WAS QUICK TO COME IN,  ANY POTENTIAL EVIDENCE, THEY  BULLDOZED IT, THAT'S WHAT THEY  DO. AND THEN THEY DUMP CONCRETE. THANK YOU. CHECK OUT MY YOUTUBE, THERE'S  MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THAT ON  THERE. >> NEXT UP WE HAVE ALYSSA  WASHINGTON. I'M SAYING IT RIGHT HOPEFULLY. ALISA WASHINGT. OKAY WE'LL SKIP THEM FOR NOW IN  CASE THEY WT TO THE RESTROOM. NEXT UP, KYLE. >> ALLISON. ALLISON. ALLISON. FOR FIVE CENTURIES EVERY STATE  BODY HAS DONE A FANTASTIC JOB OF MAKING INDIGENOUS PEOPLE  INVISIBLE AND NOT HEARD. WE OWE IT TO ALLISON FOR NOT  LOOKING INTO THIS CASE. AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED. THEY HAVE A HISTORY OF MAKING  INDIGENOUS STORIES DISAPPEAR. ALLISON LUCIER. ALLISON LUCIER. WE OWE IT TO HER. I OWE IT TO HER TO SPEAK HER  NAME SO SHE IS NOT INVISIBLE AND SHE'S NOT UNHEARD. IF YOU WERE MURDERED OR RAPED OR MURDERED OR RAPED, ANY OF YOU  WOMEN,OU DO NOT WANT TO TRUST  THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED. IF YOUR GRANDMOTHER WAS HURT OR  RAPED OR MURDERED, THE POLICE  DEPARTMENT IS NOT TO BE TRTED. YOU ARE TO BE ON TOP OF THEM. IF YOUR GREAT, GREAT  GRANDMOTHER, IF YOUR DAUGHTER OR YOUR CHILD, THEY ARE NOT TO BE  TRUSTED. WE OWE IT TO ALLISON LUCIER. WE OWE I TO ALLISON LUCIER. LOOK AT THAT SEAL YOU SIT IN  FRONT OF. INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ARE INVISIBLE  THERE. THEY DID A FANTASTIC JOB OF  MAKING NATIVES INVISIBLE AND  UNHEARD. ALLISON LUCIER. ALLISON LUCIER. ALLISON LUCIER. WE OWE IT TO HER. WE OWE IT TO HER FAMILY AND WE  OWE IT TO ALL OF OUR NATIVE  RELATIVES. WE OWE IT, BECAUSE FIVE  CENTURIES ARE BEING ATTAED,  EVERY ASSAULT IS A RESULT OF  NEGLIGENCE. >> NEXT UP WE HAVE ANNA. MS. WASHINGTON. >> HELLO EVERYONE. MY NAME IS ALYSSA WASHINGTON. FOUNDER OF THE WRONGFULLY  INCARCERATED. TODAY I WANT TO ADDRESS THE  CHARGE OF MURDER OF ALLISON  LUCIER AND THE MINNEAPOLIS  POLICE DEPARTMENT'S INADEQUATE  RESPONSE TO HER CALLS FOR HELP. THIS FAILURE MIRRORS THE TROUBL  CASES LIKE MY FIANCE'S WRONGL  CONVICTION WHERE SYSTEMATIC  ISSUES AND LACK OF  ACCOUNTABILITY HAVE LED TO  INJUSTICE. MY ORGANIZATION STANDS IN  SOLIDARITY WITH ALLISON'S FAMILY IN THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE. AND WE ALL CALL ON THE  COMMUNITY, THE MINNEAPOLIS  POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND THE  LAWMAKERS IN MINNEAPOLIS TO  ENACT REAL CHANGE. REAL CHANGE. WE'RE TIRED. WE'RE TIRED, BLACK, BROWN,  INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF  HAVING TO COME OUT HERE AND  FIGHT FOR WHAT'S CLEARLY OUR  RIGHTS. AND WE NEED PEOPLE TO ACT  SWIFTLY AND DILIGENTLY ON ALL OF THESE ISSUES. MINNESOTA NICE IS NOT MINNESOTA  NICE AT ALL. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE  OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TODAY. I'M THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AT  THE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT IN  MINNEAPOLIS. I'M HERE TO URGE THE COMMISSION  TO REVIEW THE CASE OF ALLISON  LUCIER. ALLISON WAS A CHERISHED MEMBER  OF OUR COMMUNITY, A DAUGHTER, A  MOTHER, A NIECE, AN AUNT, AND A  PERSON WITH HOPES AND DREAMS  JUST LIKE ANY OF US. HER DEATH HAS LEFT A PROFOUND  VOID IN THE LIVES OF THOSE WHO  KNEW HER AND UNFORTUNATELY THERE ARE QUESTIONS AND CONCERN THAT  REMAIN UNANSWERED. WEELY ON LAW ENFORCEMENT TO  PROTECT AND SERVE WITH TRANSPAR. WHEN SOMEONE IN OUR COMMUNITY  DIES UNDER SUSPICIOUS  CIRCUMSTANCES WITH A LONG  HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND A TRACK RECORD OF DEATH THREATS  BEING MADE AGAINST THEM BY THEIR PARTNER AS IS TRUE IN ALLISON'S  CA, IT IS VITAL THAT THESE  CASES ARE INVESTIGATED SO THAT  AT LEAST IN DEATH, THE VICTIM  CAN ATTAIN PEACE AND JUSTICE FOR THE HARM THAT THEY EXPERIENCED. TRUST IS THE FOUNDATION OF  COMMUNITY SAFETY AND  COOPERATION. THERE ARE MANY VICTIMS THAT WE  WORK WITH AT THE DOMESTIC ABUSE  PROJECT THAT DO NOT TRUST  POLICE. AND THERE ARE ALSO MANY THAT SAY THAT POLICE ABSOLUTELY SAVED TH. AND THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY  NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO SAY THE SAME THING. THE REALIT IS WE NEED BOTH  COMMUNITY-BASED STRONG RESOURCES AS WELL AS STRONG RELIEF SYSTEMS FOR THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO SEEK  SAFETY AND JUSTICEHROUGH THOSE SYSTEMS. FIRST IT WILL ENSURE A FAIR AND  IMPARTIAL INVESTIGATION AROUND  THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF ALLISON'S  CASE. SECOND, IT WILL DEMONSTRATE TO  THE COMMUNITY THAT  ACCOUNTABILITY MATTERS. AND THIRD, IT WILL OFFER THE  CHANCE TO LEARN FROM ANY  MISTAKES AND IMPLEMENT  MEANINGFUL CHANGES TO PREVENT  FUTURE TRAGEDIES. THIS COMMISSION IS ESTABLISHED  TO PROVIDE INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT AND SHINE A LIGHT SO THAT WE CAN SEE WHAT WE NEED TO SEE TO MAKE  NECESSY CHANGES SO THAT WE CAN SERVE THE COMMUNITY IN THE BEST  WAY THAT WE CAN. BY REVIEWING ALLIN'S CASE YOU  CAN OFFER CLARITY AND  REASSURANCE TO A GRIEVING  COMMUNITYHAT DEMANDS JUSTICE  AND TRUTH. THANK YOU. >> LAST SPEAKER WE HAVE --  >> EVENING COMMISSIONERS. HOWARD DODSON, WARD 2. I WENT TO HIGH SCHOOL WITH JANA  WILLIAMS. AND WHEN SHE SHARED TO ME WHAT  HAPPENED TO HER NIECE I SAID  THIS IS WHERE YOU NEED TO BE. AND I'M DISAPPOINTED THAT THAT  LETTER THAT WE REQUESTED THAT  YOU MADE ACTION ON, THAT YOU  DIDN'T ACT ON IT TONIGHT.I DID   OPCR FOR AN INTERNAL AFFAIRS  INVESTIGATION OF SERGEANT HYER  WHO REFUSES TO TALK TO JANA  WILLIAMS. THEY FAILED HER IN LIFE, AND NOW ARE FAILING HER IN DEATH. THOMAS JEFFERSON WROTE, "WE HAVE UNALIENABLE RIGHTS OF LIFE,  LIBERTY, AND PURSUIT OF  JUSTICE". BA A BASIC SERVICE OUR COUNTY  PROVIDES IS PUBLIC FETY, AND  WHEN SOMEONE IS MURDERED IN OUR  COMMUNITY, THERE NEEDS TO BE  JUSTICE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON  BETWEENHE POLICE CHIEF AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUT JUST LIKE  THE CITY AND THE COUNTY IN A HOT POTATO, KNOCK IT OFF. FIGURE IT OUT. CHARGE CHUCK FROST WITH MURDER  BECAUSE HE MURDERED ALLISON ON  FEBRUARY 17TH. AS A CHAPLAIN, I'VE WORKED WITH  100 FAMILIES AFTER HOMICIDE. I'VE BEEN WITH FAMILIES WHO  NEVER GET JUSTICE. AGINE IF YOU LOST A LOVED ONE  TO HOMICIDE AND YOU NEVER SAW  JUSTICE. WHAT WOULD YOUR GRIEF JOURNEY  BE? AS A CHAPLAIN, I WANT TO CITE A  VERSE FROM GENESIS 4: CAIN AND  ABEL. WHEN HE'S CONFRONTED, HE ASKS AM I MY BROTHER'S KEEPER AND GOD  EXPLAINS I CAN HEAR YOUR  BROTHER'S BLOOD CRYING OUT TO  ME. GOD CAN HEAR ALLISON'S BLOOD  CRYING OUT TO HIM. WHY CAN'T OUR LEADERS HEAR HER BLOOD CRYING OUT FOR JUSTICE? >> THANK YOU EVERYONE. WE'VE COMPLETED ALL PUBLIC  COMMENTS. THE NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS IS  REPORTS. I'VE ALLOCATED TEN MINUTES TO  EACH OF THESE REPOS. WE'LL BEGIN WITH THE OFFICE OF  POLICE CONDUCT REVIEW. >> WHEN IS THE MATTER OF ALLISON LUCIER GOING TO BE ON THE  AGENDA? WHERE IS IT GOING TO BE? >> NEW BUSINESS. >> BUT IT'S OLD BUSINESS BECAUSE WE PASSED A MOTION IN NOVEMBER  AND MY MOTION WAS TO HAVE IT  HEARD UNDER REPORTS. >> CAN YOU CLARIFY THE MOTION? BECAUSE THAT WASN'T MY  UNDERSTANDING WHEN SHE MADE THE  MOTION, WAS IT UNDER REPORTS? >> I BELIEVE THAT COMMISSIONER  GURIAN-SHERMAN SUGGESTED THAT  THIS MATTER COULD BE TAKEN UNDER REPORTS. >> OY. DO YOU WANT IT TO BE THE FIRST  REPORT OR AFTER THE REPORTS? >> I THINKHAT WOULD BE VERY  NICE AND ACCOMMODATING TO THE  PEOPLE WHO ARE RE. >> OKAY. I WILL JUST MENTION IN TERMS OF  THE REPORT, THE MEMO THAT  COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN  SUBMITTED TH WAS SUBMITTED TO  THE CITY COUNCIL. WE HAVE THE REPORT AND GOT  CONFIRMATION THAT THE REPORT WAS RECEIVED.  YOU WANT TO ADD ANY  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THAT? BUT THE MEMO WAS SENT AS  DIRECTED TO CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION ON WHATEVER THEY  WOULD LIKE TO DO WITH THAT  INFORMATION. >> MADAM CHAIR, I DON'T HAVE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. >> ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> THANK YOUERY MUCH FOR THAT  UPDATE. I APPRECIATE IT. JUST TO CLARIFY, MY TASK WAS T  SUBMIT A DRAFT OF A MOTION. IT WAS PRETTY DETAILED, FOUR PA  NOTES. AND WHAT I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT  WAS THAT MEMO EXACTLY SENT ON  THE LETTERHEAD OF THE CCPO? OR WAS SOMETHING DIFFERENT SENT? AND WHAT WAS WAS SENT BECAUSE  THE DRA I SENT WAS NOT  OFFICIAL. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND IF I  HAVE TO, I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WHATEVER WAS SENT TO THE CY  COUNCIL SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO  ALL OF THE COMMISSIONERS AND  SHOULD BE MADE PUBLIC. >> THE MEMO THAT YOU SENT WASN'T TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. >> THANK YOU. SO CAN WE GET A FINAL COPY OF  THAT? >> MADAM CHAIR -- THIS BODY'S  MEETING IN AUGUST, AS YOU'LL  RECALL, AND AGAIN AT THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR AND IN  JANUARY OF THIS YEAR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY HAVE USED THE  COMMENTS SECTION OF THE AGENDA  TO RAISE CONCERNS ABOUT THE  DEATH OF ALLISON LUCIER. AT THE NOVEMBER MEETING, A  MOTION WAS MADE TO AUTHORIZE THE OFFICERS TO SUBMIT A COMMENT ON  BEHALF OF THIS BODY TO THE CITY  COUNCIL REQUESTING THAT THEY  ALSO PUT INTO THE REQUEST TO THE CITY AUDITOR ALLISON LUCIER'S  CASE ALONG WITH THE CASE OF  DAVIS MATURI. CHAIR REEVES ON BEHALF OF THE  CC FORWARDED THE MOTION  CLIPPED FROM THE MINUTES AND  SENT THAT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON BEHALF OF THEODY AS SHE WAS  DIRECTED. I DO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE WAS  ANOTHER STATEMENT THAT  COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN HAD  DRAFTED AND SUBMITTED. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WAS  SUBMITTED TOHE FULL COUNCIL OR NOT. I KNOW THAT COMMISSIONER  GURIAN-SHERMAN CERTAIN CAN  SUBMIT HER COMMENT IN HER  PERSONAL CAPACITY ON BEHALF OF  THE BODY THE STATEMENT CLIPPED  FROM THE MINUTES WHICH WAS  ADOPTED BY THE BODY WAS  FORWARDED AS THE OFFICIAL  STATEMENT. I WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT THE CITY  COUNCIL SUBMIT ITS REQUEST TO  THE CITY AUDITOR FOR THE AFTER  ACTION REPORT INVOLVING THE  MATURI SHOOTING ATTS MEETING  ON OCTOBER 31ST OF LAST YEAR. THAT WAS A REQUEST TTHE CITY  AUDITOR. AS A REMINDER, THE AUDITOR IS AN INDEPENDENT OFFICIAL OF THE CIT WHO WAS APPOINTED IN REPORTS TO  THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOT THE  CITY COUNCIL. SO THE CITY COUNCIL MADE THE  REQUEST OF THE AUDITOR TO  CONSIDER ADDING THAT CASEF  ALLISON LUCIER TO THAT AFTER  ACTION REPORT. THAT INFMATION IS FOUND IN OUR LIMS STEM IN FILE NUMBER  202401293. I'M HAPPY TO FORWARD BOTH THAT L FROM CHAIR REEVES TO THE CITY  COUNCIL THAT CLIPPED THE MOTION  ADOPTED BY THIS BODY MAKING THAT SUGGESTION. THE AFTER ACTION REPORT WOULD BE REPORTED TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOT TO THE CITY COUNCIL IF AND  WHEN THE CITY AUDITOR COMPLETES  THAT REPORT, SO IT WILL BE  IMPORTANT TO WATCH THE UPCOMING  AGENDAS FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE  FOR ANY MOVEMENT ON THAT AFTER  ACTION REPORT. >> COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> I WOULD LIKE TO PAUSE AND SEE IF THERE'S ANYBODY ELSE THAT HAS ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE I GON  WITH MY NEXT ONE. I AM CONFUSED. THE MOTION THAT WASN THE  MINUTES IS ABOUT FOUR LINES. THE MOTION THAT I DRAFTED WAS F. SO WHAT I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT  IS WHAT WAS SENT TO THE CITY  COUNCIL, JUST THE MOTION WITHOUT THE MEMO THAT I WAS TASKED WITH  WRITING? IF IT WAS CHANGED, THAT'S UP TO  THE CHAIR AND THE CO-CHAIR AND  THE VICE CHAIR. BUT WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT WAS SENT AND I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE CCPO AND THE  PUBLIC BE PROVIDED AN EXACT  COPY, NOT THROUGH LIMS BUT  THROUGH THE MEANS BY OUR NEXT  MEETING OF WHAT EXACTLY WAS SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FROM THE  CHAIR AND THE VICE CHAIR. >> IS THERE A SECOND TO THAT  MOTION? >> SECOND. >> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGH MR. CLERK, IF Y  COULD TAKE THE ROLL CALL TO GET  THE EXACT COMMUNICATION SENT TO  COUNCILORS. >> COMMISSIONER SCHANFIELD. >> ABSTAIN. >> COMMISSIONER CLEMENT. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH-KOOIMAN. >> E. >> COMMISSIONER BOSTIC. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER CANADAY. >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH. >> AYE.  VICE CHAIR OLSEN. >> YES. >> CHAIR REEVES. >> YES. >> THE AYES HAVE IT AND ONE  ABSTENTION. >> ANY FURTHER --  >> KNOWING THAT THE -- IS IT THE AUDIT COMMISSION THAT'S GOING TO BE MAKING ACTIONS ONCE ACTION IS TAKEN, IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE  THEM DO A PRESENTATION HERE TO  THE CCPO? >> THROUGH THE CHAIR, I'LL SAY  CERTAINLY THIS BODY COULD  REQUEST THE CITY AUDITOR REPORT  FROM THE AUDIT COMMITTEE. IT WOULD BE UP TO THE CITY  AUDITOR AND THE AUDIT COMMITTEE  TO DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT THE  AUDITOR IS GOING TO MAKE A  PRESENTATION TO THIS BODY. THE CITY AUDITOR DOESN'T REPORT  TO THIS BODY AND HAS NO DIRECT  CONNECTION TO THIS BODY, BUT IF  THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OR THE  AUDITOR, I SUPPOSE, SAID THAT  THEY WERE WILNG TO COME TO YOU TO REPORT, THEY CERTAINLY COULD. >> THANK YOU. >> JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, I  ABSTAINED BECAUSE I WASN'T SURE  OF ALL OF THE DETAILS. IT'S UNCLEAR TO ME ABOUT THE  TIMING OF WHEN WE SENT  INFORMATION AND  MS. GURIAN-SHERMAN, IT TOOK YOU  LONGER THAN YOU EXPECTED SO  PERHAPS IT WASN'T MALL  --  MALINTENT, THAT'S WHAT I'M  TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. >> I AGREE. WHAT HAPPENED IN NOVEMBER, WE  WENT BAC AND FORTH ON THIS. THE CITY CLERK, AND THANK YOU  MR. CARL, PROVIDED SOME  CLARIFICATION ON WHAT WE SHOULD  DO. I SAID I WOULD UNDERTAKE TH. I THOUGHT I COULD WRITE THIS  MEMO AT THE END OF THE WEEK. THAT COULDN'T BE DONE BECAUSE I  WASN'T CLEAR ON WHAT EXACTLY WE  HAD PASSED BECAUSE WE DIDN'T  STATE THE MOTION. WE DIDN'T HAVE A MEETI IN  DECEMBER, SO I DIDN'T HAVE THE  ADVANTAGE OF THE MINUTES FROM  THAT MEETING UNTIL OUR JANUARY  MEETING. WHEN I SAW THE NOTES FROM THE  MEETING, I IMMEDIATELY WENT BACK TO THE YOUTUBE VIDEO AND FOUND  WHAT WE HAD TALKED AUT AND  BASED THE MEMO ON THAT. I DID THE RESEARCH, I ALSO MET  PERSONALLY WITH MS. JANA  WILLIAMS, THE AUNT OF ALLISON  LUCIER AND LIZZY PALMER WHO  REPRESENTS TWIN CITIES COALITION FOR JUSTICE WHO'S BEEN TOTALLY  ON TOP OF TS TO MAKE SURE THAT WHAT I WAS PROVIDING WAS  ACCURATE. I ALSO WAS IN TOUCH WITH  COUNCILMEMBER ROBIN WONSLEY'S STAFF BECAUSE SHE CHAIRS THE  COMMITTEE THAT WOULD MAKE THE  REQUEST. SO THAT IOULD FIND OUT HOW IT  WAS TO BE PROPERLY ADDRESSED. AND I ENDED UP SENDING OUT AN  EMAIL TO THE CCPO EXPLAINING  WHAT THAT PROCESS WAS AND  ATTACHING THE MEMO ON JANUARY  22nd. >> ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT UP THE OFFICE OF POLICE  CONDUCT REVIEW REPORT. >> GOOD EVENING. TAKING A LOOK AT OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING, WE'LL BE RUNNING  THROH SOME QUICK UPDATES WITH  STAFFING WITH THE CCPO. ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION  UPDATES AND THEN A QUICK REVIEW  OF PANEL OFHIS LAST MONTH AND  UPCOMING REVIEW PANELS THAT ARE  SCHEDULED. CURRENT MONTH, WE HAVE 12 CCPO  MEMBERS BUT THERE ARE THREE  VACANCIES. OF THE 12 SEAD MEMBERS, WE  HAVE EIGHT MEMBERS THAT ARE  ELIGIBLE TO SIT ON REVIEW  PANELS. MOST OF THE REVIEW PANELS ARE  THE SESSIONS THAT REVIEW CASES  FROM INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND THE  OFFICE OF POLICE CONDUCT RIEW  THAT HAVE GONE THROUGH AN  INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS AND ARE ON THEIR WAY TO THE CHIEF O POLICE FOR HIS DISPOSITION. THESE EIGHT MEMBERS ARE ELIGIBLE BASED ON THEIR TRAINING  COMPLETION AND OTHER  REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE COMPLET  IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE  ORDINANCE. TO FILL THESE THREE VACANCIES  BUT ALSO IN ANTICIPATION OF THE  COLETION OF TERMS IN MAY. THE CLERK'S OFFICE, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND THE  COMMUNICATIONS TEAM HAVE ALL  PARTNERED FOR A MORE ROBUST,  MORE THOROUGH RECRUITMENT  PROCESS THAT OPENED TS PAST  FRIDAY, I BELIEVE. REALLY IT'S IN AN EFFORT TO FILL THE THREE VACANCIES CURRENTLY,  BUT ALSO IN THE ANTICIPATION OF  THE VACANCIES THAT WILL ARISE AT THE END OF THE TERM IN MAY.SO W  OUTREACH ACROSS THE CITY. OUR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT IS  ALREADY DISTRIBUTING ACROSS THE  CITY. WE HAVE REALLY A FULL COURT  PRESS WITH THE PROMOTIONAL  MATERIALS AND JUST GETTING THE  INFORMATION OUT THERE TO THE  PUBL. JUST LOOKI AT OUR INTAKE UNIT, IT'S ALWAYS HELPFUL TO TAKE A  LOOK AT THE MONTH TO MONTH  TRENDS OF THE CONTEXT THAT OUR  OFFICE HAS. HERE YOU CAN SEE TOWARDS THE END OF 2024, THERE WAS A  CONSIDERABLE SPIKE. THAT'S IN BOTH CONTACTS AND  COMPLAINTS. SO WE REALLY SEE THERE'S AN  UPTICK IN THE REPORTINGF  ALLEGED POLICE MISCONDUCT. THAT'S WHAT WE WANT, WE WANT TO  BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC, WE  WANT TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO PEOPLE  WHO FEEL THERE HAS BEEN A  VIOLATION OFPOLICY. THAT ALSO DOES CREATE A LARGER  BODY OF WORK FOR OUR OFFICE AND  HISTORICALLY TRYING TO WORK  THROUGH THE BACKLOG HAS BEEN A  CHALLENGE. I THINK IN THE JANUARY MEETING,  WE COULD HIGHLIGHT THAT WE HAVE  COMPLETED ALL CASES FROM OUR  INTAKE BACKLOG AND THAT MEANS  CASES OF COMPLAINTS THAT WE  RECEIVED PRIOR TO MAY 23, 2024. SO ALL OF THOSE CASES HAVE GONE  THROUGH OUR INTAKE PROCESS WHICH IS A HUGE ACCOMPLISHMENT SINCE I THINK THE NUMBER WAS 234 CASES  IN INTAKE AS OF OCTOBER 2024. WE STILL HAVE A LOT OF WORK TO  DO. WE HAVE 101 COMPLAINTS THAT ARE  IN QUEUE AND 83 OF THOSE ARE  BEYOND THE 30 DAY MARK IN  INTAKE. SO THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE  TRYING TO BRING DOWN AS WE TALK  ABOUT INCREASING STAFFING IS  MOVING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION TO SUPPORT THIS WORK AND TO HELP US ADHERE TO TIMELINES THAT ARE  OUTLINED IN THE SETTLEMENT AGRE  DECREE. THIS IS THE BODY OF WORK THAT  HAS RESULTED FROM THE WORK IN  INTAKE AND CATCHING UP ON THAT  BACKLOG. AND AGAIN WE HAVE THE SAME TIME  PERIOD IN CONSULTATION WE'VE  HELPED TO ESTABLISH THESE. YOU CAN SEE THE BREAKDOWN OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS BY STATUS BY TIMEFRAME HERE. AND THE PRIORITY FOR YEAR ONE  FOR ELEFA AND NDHR IS CLEARING  THE BACKLOG.WE'RE MAKING SUBSTA  PROGRESS. WE'RE WORKING TODENTIFY AN  APPROPRIATE TARGET DATE AS WE  STAFF UP FULLY WITH OUR  INVESTIGATORS D AS WE REALLY  UNDERSTAND WHAT OUR CASE  CLEARANCE RATE WILL BE SO THAT  WE CAN PROVIDE EFFECTIVELY A  TARGET DATE FOR COMPLETION. REVIEW PANELS. WE VERY MUCH APPRECIATE, I  THINK, AS WE MENTIONED IN THE  PAST MEETING JUST THE ADOPTION  OF THE 2025 CCPO CALENDAR. THAT HAS IMMENSELY SIMPLIFIED TE DATES ON WHICH WE CAN HOLD  REVIEW PANELS. OBVIOUSLY THERE WILL STILL BE  OBSTACLES WHETHER THAT IS WORK  SCHEDULES, PERSONAL  ACCOMMODATIONS, THE NUMBERS HERE HAVE CHANGED FOR THE UPCOMING  MONTH OF FEBRUARY. I WILL SAY I JANUARY, WE DID  HAVE THREE NELS. WE WERE ABLE TO HEAR SIX CASES. COMING UP IN FEBRUARY, I  MENTIONED THERE WERE SOME  CHANGES HERE. WE DID HAVE TO CANCEL ONE THAT  WAS SCHEDULED ON THE 7th DUE TO  A PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCE. I WILL SAY IT IS MUCH LESS OF A  CONCERN NOW THAT WE HAVE A  STANDING CALENDAR. THERE ARE FOUR ADDITIONAL HOLDS  THROUGHOUT THE REST OF THE MONTH FOR WHICH WE CAN HOLD PANELS  INCLUDING SATURDAY. SO IMMEDIATELY, WE'RE ABLE TO  TAKE THAT CASE TO THE NEXT  SCHEDULED DATE AND REALLY NOT  HAVE AS MUCH CONCERN. THERE STILL IS CONCERN JUST  BECAUSE OF THE SHEER VOLUME OF  CASES THAT ARE COMING IN THE  PIPELINE. YOU CAN SEE RIGHT HERE AS OF  LAST WEEK WHEN THIS REPORT WAS  SUBMITTED, THERE ARE 12 CASES. I HAVE I MY NOTES THERE ARE 18  NOW. THAT'S 12 ACROSS CR AND SIX  FROM IA. AND I THINK THIS, IT'S REALLY  JUST IMPORTANTOR US TO KEEP  MOVING AND TO ENSURE THAT WE  HIGHLIGHT THE EFFORTS THAT HAVE  BEEN DONE, BUT KNOW THAT WE HAVE TO KEEP MOVING IN TERMS OF  HEARING THESE CASES, SITTING FOR PANEL, COMPLETING TRAINING AS  REQUIRED AND JUST REALL BEING  FULLY STAFFED AT THE CCPO SO  THAT WE CAN STAFF AND HOLD AS  MANY PANELS AS POSBLE  THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE  YEAR. WITH TRAINING, THIS IS  PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT AS WE ARE LOOKING TO FILL THE THREE  VACANCIES ANDHEN WITH UPCOMING NEW COMMISSIONERS POTENTIALLY IN THE SPRING AND SUMMER, WE  CONTINUE TO WORK WITH STAFF AT  THE CCPO. BUT ALSO STAFF AT THE ENTERPRISE WITH I.T. AND OTHER DEPARTMENTS  TO CREATE SORT OF SELF-GUIDED  TRAINING MODULES. IT REALLY GIVES ENORMOUSLY MORE  FLEXIBILITY TO ALL OF YOU AND TO INCOMING MEMBERS AS WELL AS OUR  STAFF WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY HAD TO SCHEDULE AND COORDINATE  ESSENTIALLY WHAT ARE RECORDED  TRAININGS. AND SO I THINK THIS GIVES A MUCH MORE ROBUST TRAING SUITE. WE'RE PARTNERING WITH NACOLE AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND REALLY  BEST PRACTICE TO DELIVER THE  MOST EFFECTIVE TRAINING TO EQUIP ALL OF THE CCPO COMMISSIONERS TO FULFILL THEIR REQUIREMENTS BASED ON THE ORDINANCE. SO WE'LL CONTINUE TO PROVIDE  UPDATES ON OUR PROGRESS WITH  I.T. AND OTHERS AS THESE ARE  DEVELOPED AND ROLLED OUT. SO MORE TO COME ON THAT AT  FUTURE MEETINGS AND FUTURE WORK. WITH THAT, I OPEN IT UP TO ANY  QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COMMISSIONER BOSTIC.  -- BASTICK. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AS YOU KNOW I'VE BEEN ASKING  SOME QUESTIONS AND I HAVE SOME  GRAV CONCERNS ABOUT THE TWO  PANEL POOL. I HAVE A TWO PART QUESTION  IMMEDIATELY IS THAT YOU WERE  KIND ENOUGH TO LET US KNOW THAT  WE ONLY HAVE 2/3 OF OUR EXISTING MEMBERS. WE HAVE 12 MEMBERSND ONLY  EIGHT OF US ARE CURRENTLY  QUALIFIED. FOR THE PUBLIC, TT MEANS  COMPLETED ALL MANDATORY TRAINING AND GONE THROUGH AND PASSED THE  FBI BACKGROUND CHECK. AND I KNOW FROM PERSONAL  EXPERIENCE THAT THAT CAN  ACTUALLY BE ACCOMPLISHED IN  UNDER TWO MONTHS. NCE I AM THE SECOND NEWEST  MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION, I  SIMPLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY WE  HAVE A NUMBER OF OUR  COMMISSIONERS WHO AREN'T READY  TO GO AND HELP US ACTUALLY  PERFORM THOSE PANEL REVIEWS  BECAUSE IT PUTS AN INORDINATE  AMOUNT OF BURDEN ON THE EIGHT  PEOPLE TO DOHOSE PANELS  BECAUSE THEY TAKE A GREAT DEAL  OF TIME. THE SECOND PART OF THAT QUESTION THOUGH AS YOU WERE KIND ENOUGH  TO PROVIDE US WITH THE  ORDINANCE, I'M GOING TO READ  THIS OUT. THERE MUST BE AT ALL TIMES AT  LEAST TEN MEMBERS OF THE  COMMISSION WHO HAVE PASSED THE  REQUIRED BACKGROUND CHECK. SO THIS DOES RATHER BEG THE  QUESTION IF ONLY EIGHT  INDIVIDUALS OUT OF THE 12 ARE  CURRENTLY ELIGIBLE TO SIT ON  THOSE REVIEW PANELS WHICH WE ARE DOING AT NIGHT, ON WEEKENDS, ARE YOU MEETING THAT CITY  REQUIREMENT RIGHT NOW? DO YOU HAVE TEN PEOPLE ON THIS  COMMISSION WHO HAVE PASSED THE  FBI BACKGROUND CHECK? >> IT'S ACTUALLY THE MPD BACKGROUND CHECK. >> LET ME JUST SAY THE  BACKGROUND CHECK. YOU CANNOT SIT ON THE PANEL WITHOUT THAT? >> CORRECT. AND FOR THIS I'LL ACTUALLY, THE  CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, I'LL  DEFER. >> THROUGH THE CHAIR, MY  UNDERSTANDING, IF IT IS CORRECT, THAT THERE ARE EIGHT MEMBERS. THAT NUMBER NOT BEING REACHED, I DON'T THINK THAT THE REMEDY FOR  THAT IS TO SHUT DOWN THE PANELS  BUT TO ENDEAVOR TO REACH THAT  NUMBER AND HOPEFULLY TO REACH A  GREATER AMOUNT THAN THAT NUMBER. I CONCUR THAT MEMBERS SHOULD  BECOME QUALIFIED AND SERVE ON  PANELS IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. THANK YOU. >> MAY I ASK A QUESTION? THANK YOU. IS IT, TO MY UNDERSTANDING, IF  MRS. BASTICK WAS ABLE TOE  QUALIFIED IN THE TWO MONTHS  TIME, IF AN ACTUAL COMMISSIONER  SAT ON THAT DOING WHAT THEY NEED TO DO -- SO I'VE DONE WHAT I  NEEDED TO DO TO DO THAT. BUT I AM NOTICING SITTING ON  PANELS THERE ARE NAMES OF PEOPLE I'VE NEVER SEEN ON PANELS. AND OF THOSE SIX PANELS, I WAS  PROBABLY ON I DON'T WANT TO SAY  ALL OF THEM, BUT MOST OF THEM. AND THERE ARE NAMES THAT I DON'T SEE THAT HAVE BEEN ON THE  COMMISSION -- SO IS IT A  COISSIONER THING OR IS IT  SOMETHING YOU ALL ARE OFFERING? I'M CONFUSED BY THAT. THANK YOU. >> AGAIN, I'LL DEFER TO THE CITY ATTORN. >> THANK YOU, DIRECTOR. WITH REGARD TO THAT QUESTION,  THAT SEEMS TO DELVE INTO  INDIVIDUAL COMMISSIONERS STATUS  AND I DON'T THINK IT WOULD BE  APPROPRIATE TO DISCUSS  INDIVIDUAL COMMISSIONER STATUS   THIS POINT. >> OKAY THEN CAN I ASK A FOLLOW  UP. >> ONE MOMENT. WE HAVE EXPIRED OUR TEN MINUTES. >> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO  EXTEND DISCUSSION FOR ANOTHER  TEN MINUTES. >> SECOND. >>LL RIGHT, ANY DISCUSSION? >> HOW ABOUT SEVEN MINUTES? >> TEN SEEMS TOO LONG. >> I WOULD ASK JUST TO VOTE HOW  YOU LIKE TO VOTE ON THE MOTION. THE MOTION IS FOR TEN MINUTES. IT'S BEEN SECONDED. >> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? >> I WOULD JUST CALL FOR A VOICE VOTE. >> VOICE VOTE IS FINE. TEN MINUTES, VOICE VOTE. YES. >> AYE. >> AY >> THREE. ANY NO'S? >> NO. >> NO. >> SOUNDS LIKE THE NO'S HAVE IT. SO NOT FOR TEN MINUTES. >> I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN  INDIVIDUAL COUNT IF WE CAN. >> OKAY. IT MIGHT BE EASIER JUST TO CALL  THE ROLL, PLEASE. >> THIS IS FOR TEN ADDITIONAL  MINUTES. >> COMMISSIONER SCHANFIELD. >> I'M VOTING NO. >> COMMISSIONER CLEMENT. >> ABSTAIN. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH-KOOIMAN. >> NO. >> COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONERGURIAN-SHERMAN. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER CANADAY. >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER SMITH. >> NO. >> VICE CHAIR OLSEN. >> NO. >> CHAIR REEVES. >> NO. >> THERE ARE THREE AYES, FIVE  NAYS, AND ONE ABSTENTION. >> OKAY, THAT MOTION FAILS. >> MOTION TO EXTEND THE  DISCUSSION BY FIV MINUTES. >> IS THERE A SECOND TO THAT  MOTION? >> SECOND. >> ALL RIGHT, MOTION AND SECOND. CAN WE PLEASE DO A VOICE TE. ALL IN FAVOR FIVE MINUTES? >> AYE. >> SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE GOOD. LET'S DO FIVE MINUTE COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> SO JUST TO RECONFIRM THEN,  THANK YOU, THE CITY IS INACT  OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH ITS OWN  ORDINANCE THEN. WE DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE TEN  PEOPLE ON THIS COMMISSION WHO  HAVE PASSED THE BACKGROUND CHECK THAT THE MPD INITIATES -- >> POINT OF INFORMATION. HOW MANY NEW MEMBERS HAVE THERE  BEEN IN THE CCPO? LIKE HOW MANY VACANCIES VERSUS  NEW MEMBERS BEING ADDED ON. KNOWING I'VE ONLY BEEN HERE A  MONTH. >> CLERK, DO YOU HAVE THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION OFF THE TOP OF  YOUR HEAD. >> WITHIN THE LAST YEAR I KNOW  COMMISSIONERS CANADAY, BASTICK,  AND SMITH-KOOIMAN ARE THE THREE  NEWEST. >> HOW MANY VACANCIES IN THE  LAST YEAR, DO WE KNOW? >> THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL  VACANCIES, MANY OF WHICH ARE NOW FILLED. THERE ARE THREE CURRENT  VACANCIES THAT ARE STILL  PENDING. >> IT SEEMS TO ME THAT GIVEN THE OUNT OF TURNOVER IN THE  COMMITTEE, IT WOULD MAKE SENSE  IF THERE'S NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE  TRAINED YET FOR PANELS. >> COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> WE AOLUTELY KNOWING THAT  I'M THE NEWEST COMMISSIONER  AGAIN I REPEAT THIS DEFINITELY  THERE'S BEEN OPPORTUNITY -- >> POINT OF ORDER. IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO  UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S NOT ONL  COMMISSIONERS' EFFORT, IT'S ALSO YOUR OWN BACKGROUND. YOU MIGHT NOT BE ELIGIBLE TO  SERVE ON THE PANEL. THAT MIGHT NOT BE OF YOUR OWN  VOLITION. >> YES, THE ORDINANCE DOES MAKE  AN ALLOWANCE FOR THOSE TO SIT ON THE COMMISSION TT CANNOT SERVE ON THE PANEL. WE DO NOT WANT TO SINGLE ANYONE  OUT, THAT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE ON THIS BODYF WHO DID NOT PASS THE BACKGROUND CHECK. IT'S VERY CLEAR WE DON'T HAVE  TEN RIGHT NOW. THE CITY IS MAKING AN EFFORT TO  GET TEN. WE DEFINITELY WANT TO MAKE SURE  THE PANELS CONTINUE. SO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE  AWARE, WE HAVE EIGHT AND THE  ORDINANCE SAYS TEN. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE  CONTINUING THE PANELS WHERE THE  COMMUNITIES CAN GET THOSE  RESOLVED IN SOME MATTER. SO YES, IT'S UNFORTUNATE WE  DON'T HAVE TEN. I DO BELIEVE THE CITY IS MAKING  EVERY EFFORT TO GET US TO TEN SO WE CAN HAVE WHAT THE CITY  ORDINANCE HAS. UNFORTUNATELY DUE TO THE VACANCIES AND THINGS THAT HAVE  HAPPENED, THIS IS WHERE WE ARE. BUT I'M GLAD THE PANELS ARE  CONTINUING. >> JUST MAKE A QUICK NOTE ABOUT  THE TIMEFRAME. SOME OF US WORK MULTIPLE JOBS  AND SO JUST BECAUSE ONE PERSON  CAN GET THE TRAININGS DONE IN  TWO MONTHS, DOESOT MEAN THAT  CAN BE APPLIED TO EVERYBODY ELSE WHO IS ON THE COMMISSI. SO JUST SPEAKING FOR MYSELF  PERSONALLY. >> THANK YOU. I'M HAVING A HARD TIME SEEING  EVERYBODY. RAISE YOUR HANDS IF I CAN SEE  YOU. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I CATCH YOU BECAUSE I CAN'T RECOGNIZE THE VOICE. GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> IID NOTICE THAT IN THE  REQUIRED TRAINING, THERE IS ONE  LITTLE TINY PIECE THAT I HAVEN'T FOUND ANY REFERENCE TO, BUT IT  IS ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL ONCE YOU  PASS YR BACKGROUND CHECK YOU  GET INVITED OR SHOULD GET  INVITED TO DO THE MANDATORY  CGIAS TRAINING WHICH I AN  ONLINE TRAINING YOU HAVE TO  ACTUALLY GENERATE A COMPLETION  CERTIFICATE. THERE'S NO REFERENCE TO IT IN  ANY OF THE MATERIALS I COULD  FIND. AND I WOULD ASK THAT YOU ARE  CLEARER ON THAT S THAT WHEN  ESPECIALLY FOR NEW COMMISSIONERS WHEN THEY LOOK AT THIS LIST,  THEY COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND WHAT  THEY HAVE TO DO. AND OF COURSE THAT REQUIRES THAT THE CITY GENERATES ACCESS TO  THAT AND IF WE COULD BE CLEARER  ONTHAT, I THINK THAT WOULD BE  HELPFUL. >> DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO  ADD? >> I THINK I AGREE WITH  EVERYTHING THE COMMISSIONER HAVE BEEN SAYING. AND TO COMMISSIONER  SMITH-KOOIMAN'S POINT, THAT IS  WHY WE ARE TRYINGO DEVELOP  SELF-GUIDED MODULES JUST TO  INCREASEHE FLEXIBILITY BECAUSE WE KNOW AND WE ARE TRYING TO IN  TERMS OF FUTURE RECRUITMENT MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE A  REPRESENTATIVE BODY AND  SOMETIMES THAT MEANS THA YOU  DIDN'T HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY OF  ATTENDING TRAININGS DURING A  9:00 TO 5:00 OR IN THE EVENING  OR WITH CHILD CARE. WE ARE TRYING TO OVERCOME THOSE  BURDENS SO I APPRECIATE YOU  SAYI THAT. AND TO YOUR POINT, COMMISSIONER  BASTICK, ABSOLUTELY WE CAN  INCLUDE EXPLICITLY THAT  REFERENCE. BUT I WILL SAY THAT WE'RE GOING  IN AND CLOSELY MANAGING AND  MONITORING TT CERTIFICATION AS IT IS A CRITICAL PIECE AND  QUALIFIER FOR ELIGIBILITY TO SIT ON THE PANEL. >> THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONER RIAN-SHERMAN. >> I KEEP FORGETTING TO DO THAT. I APOLOGIZE. I WANTED TO ADDRESS THE QUESTION THAT CAME UP IN MARCH OF LAST  YEAR, SO WE'RE GOING ON ALMOST A YEAR. I WROTE AN EMAIL ON APRIL 15,  2024,EXPRESSING MY DEEP CONCERN ABOUT WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN OUT OF THE BLUE, WE ARE THE FIRST  INDEPENDENT CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT  TO BE REQUIRED TO TAKE THE  CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION  SYSTEM TRAINING. I'VE HAD TO TAK IT IN OTHER  CAPACITIES AND IT'S NEVER BEEN  REQUIRED. ONE OF THE THINGS I'M MOST  CONCERNED ABOUT IS WE WERE TOLD  BY MR. FUSSY THAT WE ARE IN  VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW IF WE  DON'T TAKE THA TRAINING. AND ONE OF MY QUESTIONS, ONE OF  THE THINGS I POSED AND T CITY  ATTORNEY IS HERE AND I'LL BE  GLAD TO SEND HER THE QUESTIONS,  WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PANELS THAT WE DID WHEN PEOPLE DID NOT HAVE  THE TRAINING? ARE THEY NULL AND VOID? ARE THE OFFICERS THAT WERE  SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE BEING  TOLD, ARE THEIR COUNSEL BEING  TOLD THAT PEOPLE WERE SITTING ON THE PANELS THAT DID NOT HAVE THE TRAINING? YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. I'D LIKE TO FINISH MY THOUGHT -- >> POINT OF ORDER, PLEASE. >> LET HIM ANSWER THE QUESTION  BECAUSE THE TIME IS EXPIRED AND  -->> I HAVEN'T FINISHED MY  QUESTION. YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS THAT YOU WOUL REQUIRE US TO TAKE THE TRAINING OUT OF THE BLUE WITH NO JUSTIFICATION, NOTHING THAT'S  BEEN CHANGE FIRST TIME EVER IN THE HISTORY  -- >> POINT OF ORDER, PLEASE. >> COMMISSIONER  GURIAN-SHERMAN --  >> WHEN CAN I EXPECT ANSWERS TO  MY QUESTIONS. >> THE MIKE HAS BEEN MUTED. WHO HAD THE FIRST POINT OF  ORDER. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER OLSEN. GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER OLSEN. >> POINT OF ORDER, THE TIME HAS  EXPIRED. >> ALL RIGHT. THE TIME HAS EXPIRED. I THOUGHT I HEARD SOMEONE ELSE  OVER HERE IF I MISSED SOMEBODY. SO THE TIME HAS EXPIRED ON THIS  DISCUSSION. I WOULD ASK COMMISSIONER  GURIAN-SHERMAN TO ADDSS ANY  OTHER QUESTIONS TO YOU, BUT IF  YOU COULD ANSWER THE QUESTION  THAT YOU DID HEAR SINCE SHE DID  ASKHE QUESTION, IF YOU COULD  PLEASE ANSWER THAT. >> FOR THAT, I WILL DEFER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. >> THROUGH THE CHAIR, I DON'T  THINK I HAD ANY FURTHER COMMENT. I KNOW THAT THE CGIS TRAINING IS REQUIRED TO ACCESS THE REVIEW  PANEL DATA ON MOST OF THE CASES. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PRACTICE  WAS IF THERE WERE OTHER CASES IN WHICH THAT WASN'T THE CASE, BUT  I CAN'T COMMENT ON ANY  INDIVIDUAL CASES. I JUST KNOW HOW THE LAW IS SET  UP NOW AND THAT IS A REQUIREMENT UNDER THE ORDINANCE AND UNDER  FEDERAL LAW. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS FROM APRIL 15, 2024? >> THROUGH THE CHAIR -- >> POINT OF ORDER. >> I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T HEAR WHO  SAID IT. >> I DID. >> COMMISSIONER CLEMENT. >> I WOULD ASK THAT YOU SUBMIT  ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TO  STAFF. >> I'M GOING TO SUBMIT THEM TO  THE CY ATTORNEY BECAUSE THIS  IS SERIOUS -- SO YOU CAN EXPECT  MY EMAIL THIS WEEK. THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE  POLICE DEPARTMENT'S INTERNAL  AFFAIRS DIVISION REPORT. I WOULD INVITE MS. HASTINGS TO  COME UP AND PRESENT. THANK YOU. >> I'M LILY HASTINGS, CASE  MANAGER FOR INTERNAL AFIRS. TONIGHT WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER  JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS. WE'RE GOING TO DO A QUICK UPDATE FOR THE 2-100 MPD POLICY AND  PROCEDURE UPDATE THAT WAS SEN  TO THE PPRR COMMITTEE. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO TALK A  LITTLE BIT ABOUT OUR BACKLOG  UPDATES SINCE WE IMPLEMENTED OUR BACKLOG PLAN IN OCTOBER OF 2024. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER  OUR CURRENT STATISTICS AND  TRENDS. AGAIN,UST A VERY BRIEF UPDATE, WE DID RECEIVE ALL OF THE  COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONSROM  THE PPRR COMMITTEE. SO WE'RE REVIEWING THEM AND  PROCESSING THOSE SUGGESTIONS  RIGHT NOW FOR WHAT WE CAN  CHANGE. WE'RE STILL IN THE PROCESS OF  WORKING THROUGH THIS POLICY WITH ELEFA AND INTERNAL CONCURRENCE  RIGHT NOW. SO THAT'S KIND OF JUST WHERE  THAT IS AT RIGHT NOW. WE'RE JUST REVIEWING AND MAKING  IMPLEMENTATIONS AS WE CAN. THE NEXT PART IS THE IA BACKLOG UPDATE SINCE OCTOBER 2024. SO HERE WE HAVE SOME PRETTY  MAJOR PROGRESS THAT IS BEING  SHOWN. SO THIS SPECIFIC GRAPH IS THE  TOTAL NUMBER OF OPEN ADMIN  INVESTIGATIONS. AS OF, WHAT WAS THAT? SEPTEMBER 27, 2024, THERE WERE  112 OPEN ADMIN INVESTIGATIONS. AS OF JANUARY 30, THERE WERE 66  OPEN ADMIN INVESTIGATIONS. AND ONLY 44 OF THAT 66 ARE  BACKLOG INVESTIGATIONS MEANING  THAT THEY' OVER 180 DAYS OLD. OUR OLDEST AGE OF INTAKE CASES  HAS GONE DOWN. THAT WAS SOMETHING WE'VE TALKED  ABOUT MULTIPLE MONTHS IS GETTING THAT DOWN TO 30. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR AVERAGE AGE  AT 30. BUT WE ALSO STRIVE TO HAVE OUR  OLDEST AGE AT 30 AT THIS POINT. AS OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2024, WE HAD AN OEST AGE OF 77 DAYS FOR  OPEN INTAKE CASES AND NOW OUR  OLDEST AGE AS OF JANUARY 30TH  AND MY APOLOGIES THAT'S SUPPOSED TO SAY 2025, NOT 2024 FOR  JANUARY 30TH. OUR OLDEST AGE IS 35 DAYS FOR  OPEN INTAKE CASES. THE NEXT ONE AGAIN IS WE ARE  LIKELY TO SEE THIS COMEOWN AS  WE'RE PROCESSING THROUGH  INVESTIGATION CASES. BUT THIS IS THE OLDEST AGE OF  OPEN ADMIN INVESTIGATIONS. PREVIOUSLY BACK IN SEPTEMBER 27  OF 2024 WE HAD REPORTED THAT OUR OLDEST CASE WAS 1,190 DAYS OLD. AS WE BEGIN PROCESSING THROUGH  THOSE INVESTIGATIONS AND MOVING  THEM ALONG TO REVIEW PANEL AND  THE PROCEDURES THAT FOLLOW AFTER REVIEW PANEL, OUR OLDEST CASE  NOW AT JANUARY 30, 2025, IS 789  DAYS OLD. AND THLOWEST CASE AFTER THAT  IS ABOUT 150 DAYS LESS THAN  THAT. THE ONLY OTHER THING I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT, MY APOLOGIES THERE IS NOT A SLIDE, BUT IF WE ARE  LOOKING AT THE PREVIOUS CCPO  UPDATES, OUR AVERAGE AGE OF  ADMIN CASES JUST SINCE LAST  MONTH WENT DOWN 50 DAYS AS WELL. ALL RIGHT, MOVING ON TO IA  STATISTICS. AS OF JANUARY 30, 2025, WE HAD  20 OPEN INTAKES. THE AVERAGE AGE IS 27 DAYS O. AND OUR AVERAGE DURATION TO  COMPLETE THE INTAKE PHASE IS 25  DAYS. AGAIN THAT'S THE UNDER 30 DAYS  TIMELINE. FOR OPEN INVESTIGATIONS, THIS IS ADMIN INVESTIGATIONS AS OF  JANUARY 30, 2025, WE HAVE 66  CASES. THE AVERAGE AGE IS 349 DAYS. THAT'S THE POINT THAT'S LOWER  THAN ABOUT 50 SINCE OUR LAST  REPORT HERE. 44 OF THOSE 66 CASES ARE  CONSIDERED BACKLOG CASES. 22 ARE CONSIDERED CURRENT CASES. 63 OF THOSE 66 ARE ASSIGNED AND  THREE OF THE 66 ARE UNASSIGNED. THE UNASSIGNED CASESRE CURRENT CASES THAT ARE UNDER 180 DAYS  OLD AND THEY GET ASSIGNED OUT AS THE INVESTIGATORS ARE COMPLETING THEIR BACKLOG CASES JUST BECAUSE WE WANT THEM TO PRIORITIZE THAT  WORK AND NOT SKIP AHEAD AND TRY  TO DO A CURRENT CASE INSTEAD. OPEN CASES AND EXPEDITED  DISPOSITION. AS OF JANUARY 30, 2025, WE HAVE  116 CASES. 83 OF THOSE 116 ARE CONSIDERED  BACKLOG AND 33 OF THOSE 116 ARE  CONSIDERED CURRENT CASES. THE LAST PART IS OPEN  INVESTIGATION CASES AND  SUPERVISORY REEW. AS OF JANUARY 30, 2025, THIS IS  36 CASES. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY  EXPEDITED DISPOSITION CASES THAT ARE IN SUPERVISORY REVIEW, ONLY  ADMIN CASES. AND THEN MOVING ON TO CONTINUING ON TNDING DATA THAT WE HAVE  BEEN PROVIDING. SO FOR JANUARY, WE HAVE 21  INCOMING COMPLAINTS AND WE HAD 20 INTAKES ACTUALLY COMPLETED IN JANUARY. AGAIN AS WE TALKED ABOUT LAST  MONTH, THIS IS KIND OF BUILDING  UPON EACH MONTH. IT'S NOT JUST WE GOT 21 IN AND  WE ONLY DID 20 OF THOSE 21. THOSE STATISTICS BUILD EACH  MONTH. THIS IS JUST OUR OPEN ADMIN  CASES. AGAIN WE TALKED ABOUT 44 BACKLOG ADMIN INVESTIGATIONS. 22 CURRENT ADMIN INVESTIGATIONS. 83 BACKLOG EXPEDED AND CURRENT EXPEDITED. AND LAST ONE IS PERCENTAGE OF  THE BACKLOG CLEARED. AGAIN WE' STILL SITTING AT  36%. THE REASON YOU'LL SEE THAT IS  BECAUSE THAT REQUIRES US TO GET  ALL OF THE WAY THROUGH CLOSED  FINAL STATUS. JUST BECAUSE WE'RE CLEARING  THROUGH OUR INVESTIGATION  BACKLOG DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE  ARE CLEARED THROUGH THE BACKLOG  PERSALLY BECAUSE WE HAVE TO  GET IT THROUGH REVIEW PANEL,  CHIEF'S OFFICE. IF A GRIEVANCE IS FILED AT THIS  POINT, IT HAS TO GET ALL THE WAY THROUGH GRIEVANCE AND  POTENTIALLY ARBITRATION FILED IN ORDER TO BE CLEARED OF THE  BACKLOG AND FINALLY CLOSED. WITH THAT, ANY QUESTIONS? >> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, ANY ESTIONS? >> THANKS FOR MENTIONING THE  POLICY REVIEW AND ITS  COURAGING THAT THE WORK THAT  WE DID ON THAT COMMITTEE IS  ACTUALLY BEING CONSIDERED. BUT I HAVE ONE QUESTION. YOU MENTIONED THA PART OF THE  PROCESS NOW THAT THE GROUP IS  WORKING ON IS SOMETHING I THINK  YOU SAID CONCURRENCE. IT'S GOING THROUGH A CONCURRENCE PROCESS. CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THAT IS? >> YEAH, SO PART OF OUR POLICY  UPDATES AND VIEW IS SOMETHING  CALLED INTERNAL CONCURRENCE. AND THAT POINT, I HOPE THEY CAN  EXPLAIN IT A LITTLE BIT AND THEN I CAN TRY AND MAYBE YOU CAN STEP IN IF I NEED. TO MY UNDERSTANDING, WE DO SEND  OUT OUR DRAFT POLICIES WITHIN  MPD LEADERSHIP IN ORDER TO GET  FEEDBACK FROM LEADERS AS WELL. YEAH? >> YOU'RE PRETTY MUCH CORRECT. IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE  DEPARTMENT'S LEADERSHIP AS WELL  AS OFFICERS TO ENGAGE AND  PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON THE POLICY  CHANGES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED. >> GREAT, THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> THANK YOU. MS. HASTINGS, IS THERE ANYTHING  DIFFERENT, IN PARTICULAR, IN  TERMS OF INFORMATION THAT YOU'VE REPORTED ON IN THIS FEBRUARY  REPORT THAN YOU HAVE IN JANUARY  OR PREVIOUS MONTHS? >> IN PREVIOUS MONTHS WE'VE  TALKED ABOUT STAFFING AND  TRAINING AND THERE JUST WEREN'T  ANY UPDATES FOR THIS MOH. >> SO DO YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU'RE PROVIDING THE INFORMATION THAT  IS PERTINENT TO US UNDER THE  ORDINANCE IN OUR SUPERVISION  ROLE? >> YES, I DO BELIEVE SO. >> THANK YOU. YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE  ORDINANCE THAT REQUIRES QUOTE  COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION AND  DISCIPLINE RECORDS TO BE  PROVIDED CONSISTENT WITH  MINNESOTA STATUTES AND OTHER  APPLICABLE LAW SHALL BE SHARED  WITH THE MEMRS OF THE  COMMUNITY COMMISSION ON POLICE  OVERSIGHT. I GOT AN EMAIL THAT SAYS THEY  ARE IN ZERO COMPLIANCE OF THAT. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT SINCE THIS  IS -- AND IT IS MANDATED TO BE  PROVIDED DO WE AS COMMISSION  HAVE TO REQUEST THIS INFORMATION COME FROM OPCR AND IA OR SHOULD  IT BE HAPPENING AUTOMATICALLY? >> I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN. I DID RECEIVE THE EMAIL FROM  CHUCK AS WELL. BUT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION, I  WOULD HAVE TO DEFER TO OUR CITY  ATTORNEY REGARDING THE SHALL USE THERE. >> SO SAME QUESTION. SINCE THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES  TH, DO WE HAVE TO MAKE A  SPECIFIC MOTION TO REQUEST WHAT  IS REQUIRED UNDER ORDINANCE? >> MADAM CHAIR AND  COMMISSIONERS, I DON'TAVE ANY  OTHER COMMENTS THAN THE OTHER  SIX TIMES THAT I'VE ADDRESSED  THAT. THERE'S BEENO UPDATES THAT I'M AWARE OF. I KNOW IT'S DIFFICULT  SITUATION WITH REGARD TO  COMPLIANCE ON THIS MATTER. I KNOW THERE IS AN ORDINANCE  DRAFT OF AMENDMENTS THAT IS  BEING WORKED ON BY THE CITY  ATTORNEY, BUT I DON'T HAVE ANY  DITIONAL INFORMATION WITH  REGARD TO THIS MATTER. AND I KNOW IT'S BEEN DISCUSSED  MULTIPLE TIMES. >> IF IT'S BEEN DISCUSSED  MULTIPLE TIMES AND YOU'VE GIVEN  ANSWERS, CAN YOU SIMPLY REPEAT  WHAT YOU'VE PROVIDED? >> I DON'T HAVE ANY FURTHER  COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. WE HAVE REACHED TIME ON THIS  ITEM. THANK YOU, MS. HASTINGS. ALL RIGHT. I'LL DIRECT THE CLERK TO RECEIVE AND FILE THAT REPORT. FINALLY WE HAVE THE REPORT FROM  THE POLICE PARTMENT'S  IMPLEMENTATION TEAM. I'LL INVITE THE IMPLEMENTATION  TEAM TO COME UP, INTRODUCE  THEMSELVES AND GIVE THE  PRESENTATION. >> IMPLEMENTATION UNIT. THIS IBRENDAN. THANK YOU GUYS FOR HAVING ME  HERE TODAY. WE'RE GOING TO START WITH  TALKING ABOUT PREVIOUS REQUESTS, KEY UPDATES, COMMUNITY  ENGAGEMENT, POLICY, TRAINING,  HEALTH AND WELLNESS AND THEN R NEXT STEPS. PREVIOUS REQUESTS, YOU GUYS  REQUESTED OUR ORGANIZATIONAL  CHART AND OUR FIRST AND LAST  NAMES ON THE ORGANIZATIONAL  CHART. SO WE PROVIDED TT. TWO OF THE PREVIOUS QUESTIONS I  BELIEVE IN THE LAST MEETING WAS  HOW MANY PEOPLE ON AVERAGE  RESPOND TOUR POLICY REQUESTS. ON AVERAGE WEECEIVE 3.3  RESPONSES TO OUR POLICY. I KNOW THAT CAN BE DECEIVING,  THAT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE A LOT. BUT EACH ONE OF THOSE OFTEN IS A COMMUNITY GROUP WHICH REPRESENTS MULTIPLE COMMUNITY MEMBERS. OUR TEAMEMBERS THAT REVIEW ALL FEEDBACK AND THEY LOOK TO  INTEGRATE THAT INTO THE POLICY. ALSO WE DO OFFICER AND  SUPERVISOR FEEDBACK SESSIONS. WE MEET WITH OFFICERS, WE  PRESENT THE POLICY, AND WE GET  THEIR FEEDBACK ON WHAT THEY THINK AND WE BRING THAT ALSO TO  OUR POLICY TEAM. HOW DO WE RESPOND TO THESE  POLICY EMAILS? WE'RE GOING TO COVER THAT IN OUR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMEN UPDATE BUT  SO FAR WE'VE RECEIVED OVER 400  SIGN UP REQUESTS FOR THE POLICY  NOTIFICATIONS. SOME OF THE OTHER PVIOUS  REQUESTS YOU WANTED US TO EXPAND ON, THE OFFICER WELLNESS AND  SUPPORT. WE'RE DEVELOPING A PEER SUPPORT  TEAM. I BELIEVE WE HAVE WE HAVE OVER  15, MAYBE 18 NEW PEERUPPORT  OFFICERS. WE'RE ALSO ATTEMPTING TO GET  OFFICER BUY IN BY ADDRESSING  MENTALEALTH AND PHYSICAL  HEALTH WE'VE ALSO PLANNING AN EVENT  CALLED THE SNOWSHOE SHUFFLE  APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND REC. IT'S GOING TO BE BETWEEN  1:00 P.M. AND 9:00 P.M.  SOME OF THE KEY UPDATES HERE. ONE OF THE CONCERNS WAS THE  COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMUNITY. SOME OF THE PEOPLE WHOON'T  HAVE WIFI OR INTERNET. WE HAVE BEEN PROVIDING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PRESENTATION VIA  PAPER COPIES TO PEOPLE AT THE  COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS OF THE  PARK AND RECS FACILITIES. ANOTHER THING WE'VE DONE TO  ENHANCE TRANSPARENCY AND ENHANCE VISIBILITY IS RECRUITED THAT  SUBSCRIBER LIST FOR OUR  POLICIES. SO ANYBODY CAN GO ON THE  WEBSITE. AND ANYTIME WE PT ANYING  LIKE AN UPDATE FOR  IMPLEMENTATION PAGE AND  POLIES, AN EMAIL BLAST GETS  SENT OUT AND EVERYONE GETS  NOTIFIED. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE  COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STEPS AND  INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBSCRIBING. SO IF YOU GO TO E WEBSITE,  YOU'RE CONFUSED ON HOW T SIGN  UP, WE HAVE INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW  TO SIGN UP AND DO THIS. OUR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TEAM  ALSO PASSES THIS OUT. PAPER COPIES SO COMMUNITY  MEMBERS CAN SCAN YOUR PHONE. IF THEY HAVE ACCESS TO A  COMPUTER, THEY CAN SIGN UP FOR  THOSE UPDATES. WE'RE CURRENTLY WORKING ON  CITATIONS AND ARRESTS,  ENGAGEMENT WITH MINORS, EIS,  HEALTH AND WELLNESS POLICY. THERE'S ONLY A FEW POLICIES  WRITTEN HERE, BUT THIS IS A LOT  OF WORK. THERE'S MULTIPLE PAGES TO EACH  ONE OF THESE. AND GOING THROUGH EVERY SINGLE  PIECE OF FEEDBACK IS DAUNTING. IT'S EXTRAORDINARY WHAT OUR  THREE POLICY WRITERS ARE DOING. IT'S A LOT OF WORK AND I GIVE MY HATS OFF TO THEM. AND SOE'RE ACTIVELY WORKING ON IT. THIS IS OUR PLANNED TRAINING  SCHEDULE FOR 2025. THIS IS THE FLIER FOR THE  SNOWSHOE SHUFFLE ON  FEBRUARY 15TH. WE'RE WORKING WITH THE  MINNEAPOLIS POLICE FOUNDATION. 0% OF THE PROCEEDS BENEFIT  OFFICER SUPPORT AND WELLNESS. WE'RE GOING TO BE USING THOSE  FUNDS TO PURCHASE A HEALTH RATE  VARIABILITY, MEASURENT KITS  VO2 MAX ANALYZER AND TACTICAL  WELLNESS HEART SCREENINGS. OFFICERS CAN MONITOR THEIR  STRESS LEVEL WITH SOME OFHAT  EQUIPMENT AND LOOK AT WHAT THE  RECOVERY IS LIKE SO THEY CAN  ADDRESS THEIR REST TIMES AND  THEY CAN ACTUALLY LOOK AND SEE  HOW THEIR BODY IS RECOVERING AND MAYBE THEY SHOULDN'T WORK. OFFICER SUPPORT SYSTEMS, THIS IS FORMALLY KNOWN AS EIS. IT'S EARLY INTERVENTION SYSTEM. IT'S BASICALLY DESIGNED TO GIVE  ALERTS AND FOR OFFICERS THAT  MIGHT NEED SUPPORT. AND THEN A SUPERVISOR WOULD GET  THAT ALERT AND THEY'D EVALUATE  AND BUILD A PLAN WITH THAT  OFFICER AND IMPLEMENT SOME KIND  OF INTERVENTION AND THEN  EVALUATE. AND ALSO OUR PEER SUPPORT PLAN  OR PROGRAM ALSOIKE I  MENTIONED, WE ARE CURRENTLY  BUILDING THE TEAM UP. WE HAD 21 APPLICANTS, I BELIEVE  WE SELTED 18 LIKE I MENTIONED  EARLIER. NEXT STEPS, LOOKING TOONTINUE  TO WORK ON THAT POLICY. IT'S REALLY BIG THIS FIRST YEAR, AND IT'S A LOT OF WORK LIKE I  MENTIONED AND WE'RE GOING TO  CONTINUE TO REFI BOTH OUR  INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL REPORTING. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU.  APPRECIATE YOU ANSWERING THE  QUESTIONS CLEARLY FROM  PREVIOUSLY ON YOUR SLIDE. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER SCHANFIELD BECAUSE  I HAVEN'T HEARD FROM HER TODAY. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. REALLY APPRECIATE THE CLEAR  INFORMATION, THE LAYOUT OF THE  POLICIES IS REALLY HELPFUL. ONE OFFER, YOU'VE MENTIONED THE  THREE FOLKS WHO ARE GOING  THROUGH THE POLICY VERY  DELIBERATELY.WE HAVE BANDWIDTH D THE CHAIR OF THE PPRR COMMITTEE, IF THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN HELP  YOU WITH, WE WOULD INVITE THEM  TO COME TOUR NEXT MEETING,  NEXT MONDAY, THE 10th IN THE  COMMUNITY PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER. WE WOULD LOVE IF ONE OF THEM COULD COME AND THAT WAY WE COULD ALIGN OUR EFFORTS AND SEE IF WE  COUL HELP REDUCE THE  DUPLICATION OF EFFORTS. WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO HELP. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE THE  ORGANIZATIONAL CHART. TERRIFIC. I NOTICE THERE'S 24 POSITIONS. TEN OF THEM COME WITH NAMES AND  THEN THERE ARE LOOKS LIKE 14  THAT DON'T HAVE NAMES ATTACHED TO THEM AND THEN TWO THAT ARE  OPEN. OF THE 14 THAT DON'T HAVE NAMES  ATTACHED TO THEM, ARE ALL OF  THOSE OPEN AS WELL? BECAUSE THE TWO THAT DON'T HAVE  NAMES SAY THAT THEY'RE OPEN. SO CAN WE GET THE NAMES OF THE  OTHER 14 PEOPLE AND THEIR  POSITIONS? >> I'D HAVE TO TALK TO MY  COMMANDER ABOUT THAT, BUT I  DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH THAT. I THINK ORIGINALLY WE JUST PUT  THE MANAGERS ON THERE AND THE  FIRST AND LAST NAMES AND WE JUST PUT THE MANAGERSON. >> GREAT. THAT WOULD BE GREAT. I ALSO WANT TO COMMEND YOU FOR  THE PAGES ABOUT COMMUNITY  ENGAGEMENT AND HOW TO SUBSCRIBE  TO THE IMPLEMENTATION UPDATES. I DO WANT TO SUGGEST, I DON'T  KNOW WHO EXACTLY IS DOING IT,  BUT SOME OF US AGREED TO BE AT  THE CONFERENCE THIS WEEK. AND I THINK THIS WOULD BE AN  EXCELLENT HANDOUT TO PROVIDE AT  THE COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS EVENT. PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW HOW TO SIGN  UP AND GET THESE. SO I'M WILLING TO MAKE THAT  SUGGESTION TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ORGANIZINGT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR THAT. I NOTICED THE SNOWSHOES SHUFFLE. IS THIS PART OF THE COMMUNITY  ENGAGEMENT THAT FALLS UNDER THE MDHR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT? >> NO, MA'AM. >> OKAY. ARE THERE ANY PLANS TO PARTNER  WITH COMMUNITY GROUPS TO DO  SIMILAR TYPE OF FUNDRAISING  EVENTS OR EVENTS? WE JUST HAD A LOT OF PEOPLE  SPEAKING ABOUT ALLISON LUCIER. WE KNOW THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE  WHO HAVE BEEN SURVIVORS OF  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, FAMILY  MEMBERS WHO HAVE LOST PEOPLE. IT WOULD BE VERY GOOD FOR THE  POLICE DARTMENT TO BE HAVING  HEALTH AND WELLNESS EVENTS THAT  ALSO TAKE INTO ACCOU THE  PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED  BY MPD IN THE PAST AND MAYBE  EVEN PRESENTLY AS WELL. AND I THINK IT WOULD GO A LONG  WA IN SHOWING THAT THIS ISN'T A ONE-SIDED KIND OF THING. >> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. >> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> EXCELLENT REPORT. I LOVE THE WAY THAT YOU ARE  OPENLY ADDRESSED PAST QUESTIONS  AND SAYING THIS IS A QUESTION WE HEARD LAST TIME, HERE'S THE  ANSWER. LOVE IT. I REALIZE THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DECREE HAS NOT BEEN  SIGNED YET. THEREFORE IT'S NOT OFFICIALLY IN PLACE. BUT HAVING READ IT, I AM  WONDERING, I'M ALSO ON THE PPRR  COMMITTEE AS WELL. I AM WONDERING IF YOU ARE BEING  SOMEWHAT MINDFUL OF POTENTIAL  CHANGES THAT MIGHT IN FACT  IMPACT THE POLICY AS YOU'RE  UPDATING POLICIES? >> I KNOW IN SOME OF THE, LIKE  YOU MENTIONED, SOME OF THE  POLICIES THAT WE'RE WORKING ON,  WE'RE IMPLEMENTING SOME OF THOSE WITH CHANGES INTO THAT POLICY. >> SUPER, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. TI HAS EXPIRED ON THIS REPORT. RECEIVE AND FILE FOR THE CLERK. THANK YOU, SIR. NEXT WE'LL TAKE REPORTS FROM OUR ANDING COMMITTEES. THE FIRST REPORT IS FROM OUR  POLICE POLICY RESEARCH AND  RECOMMENDATIONS COMMITTEE. THAT REPORT WILL BE GIVEN BY THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, COMMISSIONER  SCHANFIELD. >> THANKS. HOW MUCH TIME ON THE AGENDA? N MINUTES, OKAY. WE'LL SEE IF WE CAN SPEED  THROUGH. DELIGHTED TO HEAR THAT THE  FEEDBACK THAT OUR GROUP WORKED HARD ON WENT TO THE  IMPLEMENTATION UNIT AS WELL AS  IA. I ALSO READ IN THE  IMPLEMENTATION UNIT'S MEMO  RECENTLY FROM THE  SUBSCRIPTIONIST WHETHER OR NOT  THE CONSENT DECREE IS SIGNED  THAT THE CONTENTS OF THAT WILL  BE FOLLOWED. I WAS DELIGHT TO READ THAT AS  WELL. WE WILL CERTAINLY KEEP THAT IN  MIND AS WE REVIEW THE POLICIES. FOR THE OFFICIAL MEETING IN  JANUARY, WE REVIEWED POLICY FOR  223, A SET OF POLICIES UNDER THE 2100s AS MS. HASTINGS MENTIONED  AND THE POLICY SERIES 2500. THOSE WERE WHAT WE UNDERSTOOD TO BE POSTED FOR REVIEW. AND SO WE SENT IN OUR FEEDBACK. IN THE FUTURE, MY INTENTION IS  TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR NOTES GET  TO THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT  COMMISSION SO THAT EVERYONE  ESSENTIALLY HERE WILL BE ABLE TO SEE THOSE AND THAT IT WILL COME  BACK AROUND TO OUR GROUP. SO IT WILL BE SUBMITTED ON  BEHALF OF THE WHOLE COMMISSION,  NOT JUST MYSELF AND THE  COMMITTEE. WHAT I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SHARE  IS THAT IT WOULD BE REALLY  HELPFUL. WE WOULD SORT OF FORMALLY  INVITE, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER,  WE WOULD FORMALLY INVITE SOMEONE FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION UNIT TO  JOIN OUR FORMALEETINGS. I'LL HAPPILY SEND THE DATES AS  WELL IN ADVANCE. WE'LL SPEND OUR TIME REVIEWING  POLICIES. AND WE ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH  AS MUCH AS WE CAN. AND IF WE DO IT IN AN ORDER THAT IS HELPFUL TO YOU, THAWOULD BE IDEAL. SO THAT KIND OF COLLABORATION  ACROSS THE IMPLENTATION UNIT  AND THE CCPO WOULD BE REALLY  BENEFICIAL TO EVERYONE. I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE THE OTHER MEMBERS BECAUSE WE HAVE EIGHT  MINUTES, TWO MINUTES EACH IF  THEY WOULD LIKE TO ADD ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE AND SORT OF ANYTHING  THEY'D LIKE TO ADD TO THE  DISCUSSION. >> I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANYTHING  TO ADD, BUT I DO WANT TO THANK  THE CLERK AND THE STAFF FOR THE  TREMENUS AMOUNT OF ASSISTANCE  ON THIS STUFF AND HELPING US  ORGANIZE AND PRESENT OUR  THOUGHTS WAY MORE COHERENTLY  THAN WE EXPRESSED THEM IN OUR  MEETING. >> COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> I WAS GOING TO GIVE MY TIME  TO FOLKS ON THE COMMITTEE AND  THEN WE WOULD WELCOME QUESTIONS. >> I'LL JUST MAKE ONE BRIEF  COMMENT TO THE EXTENT THIS IS  SOMETHING THAT THE  IMPLEMENTATION UNIT OR ANYONE  ELSE IN THE CITY STAFF WHO MAY  BE HEARING THIS COULD KEEP IN  MIND. LAST MONTH WE REVIEWED I THINK  MAYBE 15 SEPARATE POLICIES. FOR SOME OF THEM WE HAD RED  LINES, FOR SOME OF THEM WE  DIDN'T. YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE HOW MUCH  MORE DIFFICULT IT IS TO FUNCTION AS A COMMUNITY WHEN WE'RE NOT  STARTING WITH A CLEAR IDEA AND A SURE UNDERSTANDING OF THE  CHANGES AS THEY'RE BNG POSED. SO I THINK WE ALL LEARNED A  LESSON WE'LL BE TRYING TO SLOW  DOWN OURSELF. T I THOUGHT IT WAS WORTH  SHARING TO THINK ABOUT THAT AS  YOU'RE PASSING THESE POLICIES ON FOR PUBLIC REVIEW, I THINK IT'S  EQUALLY TRUE THAT YOU'RE GOING  TO GET A BETTER PRODUCT OUT OF ♪ PEOPLE IF WE ALL MAKE SURE THAT  THERE'S A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IT'S BEING CHANGED FROM AND WHAT IT'S BEING PROPOSED TO  CHANGE TO. >> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> I WOULD ECHO WHAT  COMMISSIONER CANADAY SAID IS  THAT ANYONE THAT'S ABLE TO HELP  , WE'VE GOT NINE POLICIES THAT WE'RE GOING TO I BELIEVE BE  LOOKING AT NEXT MONDAY. IF WE COULD GET A RED LINE, I'M  NOT AWARE THAT WE'VE BEEN  GETTING ONE, THAT IS ENORMOUSLY  HELPFUL. THIS IS REALLY COMPLICATED STUFF AND IT HELPS US SPEED THROUGH  IT. THANK YOU. >> FOR A LITTLE BIT OF  CLARIFICATION, THE RED LINE WERE THE POLICIES POSTED FOR FEEDBACK ON EITHER JANUARY 30TH OR  FEBRUARY 2ND. SO THEY WERE POSTED AND THE IMPLEMENTATION UNIT SENT US THE  RED LINES DIRECTLY. THAT WAS REALLY HELPFUL. I FND ON THE WEBSITE THEY WERE ALSO POSTED UNDER THE FIRST  POLICY IN THAT SERIES OF POLICIES. SO I THINK PLEASE REMIND ME, WE  WILL LOOK AT THAT. BUT I'M ASSUMING THERE WERE ONLY BE RED LINES FOR THE POLICS  CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW SO THAT'S SOMETHING I WOULD LOVE SOME  CLARIFICATION ON. THAT WOULDE REALLY HELPFUL. >> ANYONE ELSE FROM THE  COMMITTEE? ALL RIGHT, HEARING NO OTHER  MMENTS FROM THE COMMITTEE,  LET'S OPEN IT UP FOR DISCUSSION. ANY QUESTION COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> YES, I THINK THE JANUARY 29TH MEMO IS REALLY EASY TO READ. I CAN REALLY APPRECIATE HAVING  NINE OF THESE IN FRONT OF US. SO I HAVE TWO SPECIFIC  QUESTIONS. UNDER THE ORDINANCE WE HAVE A  MANDATE THAT SAYS QUOTE, THE  COMMISSION SHALL REVIEW OR  PROVIDE THE PUBLIC WITH ITS  ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION  WITHIN 120 DAYS OF PROPOSED  CHANGES TO POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND SPECIAL ORDERS, ET CETERA. HOW ARE WE MAKING THIS AVAILABLE TO THE PUIC? I DON'T THINK THAT ATTACHING A  REPORT TO THE CCPOGENDA IS  SUFFICIENT TO BE MAKING IT TO  THE PUBLIC. AND I'M NOT POINTING FINGERS AT  THE PPRR COMMITTEE, YOU HAVE  ENOUGH TO DO. I THINK WE HAVE NOT YET TACKLED  THIS AS A COMMISSION, AND I  THINK IT HAS TO BE ON SOMEONE'S  AGENDA WHETHER IT'S A COMTTEE  OR US AS A WHOLE. WE NEED TO LET THE COMMUNITY  KNOW WE'RE LOOKING THESE OVER  AND WE HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS. AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT THAT IS. I JUST WANT TO BRING THAT UP. SO WE HAVE TO TACKLE THAT. I ALSO WANT TO SAY ON MY WAY  OVER HERE TAY, I HEARD ON MPR  AN INTERVIEW WITH A REPORTER WHO HAD AD THE ELEFA REPORT ON  POLICY, AND THERE WERE THINGS TO HIGHLIGHT AND TO SUGGEST THAT  THINGS WERE GOING IN THE RIGHT  DIRECTION. AND THEN THERE WERE THINGS  PARTICULARLY ON USE OF FORCE. AGAIN, WHAT I WANT TO KNOW AND  AGAIN I'M NOT DIRECTING THIS TO  ANYONE IN PARTICULAR, BUT TO US, WE HAVE TO TACKLE WHEN ELEFA  COMES OUT WITH MONITORING  REPORTS, HOW ARE WE REVIEWING  THEM AND GETTING OUT TO THE  PUBLIC OUR TAKE ON THAT. THE USE OF FORCE -- >> POINT OF ORDER, CAN WE GET A  CLARIFICATION ON EXACTLY WHAT  THE QUESTION IS, PLEASE, AND WHO IT'S DIRECTED TO? >> THERE IS NO QUESTION, IT'S A  COMMENT. I DON'T HAVE TO ASK A QUESTION. THAT IS NOT A REQUIREMENT. I WAS CALLED ON, I HAVE TWO  MINUTES THAT I CAN SPEAK TO THIS ISSUE ACCORDINGO RULES. SO I'M SAYING THERE ARE TWO  MATTERS THAT WE HAVE TO TACKLE  AS A COISSION. HOW WE GET THIS PUBLIC  INFORMATION OUT IN 120 DAYS, AND HOW DO WE TACKLE REVIEW OF THE  ELEFA MONITORING REPORT WITH THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND  HOPEFULLY WITH THE FEDERAL  CONSENT DECREE. >> OKAY. >> MADAM CHAIR, I WANT TO  RESPOND TO THE FIRST PART OF  THAT IF I COULD BECAUSE WE'VE  TALKED ABOUT THIS A FEW TIMES AT THIS BODY'S LEVEL, THE CCPO. WITH THE TWO STANDING  MMITTEES, THE INTENTION OF  THAT PROCESS WAS THAT THE POLICE POLICY REVIEW AND  RECOMMENDATIONS COMMITTEE WOULD  MEET FIRST SO THAT IT COULD  REVIEW AND PROVIDE COMMENT AND  FEEDBACK ON THOSE POLICIES AND  TH WOULD REFER THEIR  RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE IN THE NEXT WEEK. SO THAT AS PUBLICATION OF THAT  AGENDA THAT'S NOTICED TO THE  PUBLIC, THE MATERIALS WILL BE  INCLUDED WH THAT AGENDA AND AT THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT  MEETING, THE COMMITTEE MEETING,  THERE WOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY  FOR THE COMMITTEE TO SHARE THAT  INFORMATION WITH THE PUBLIC AND  TO TAKE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT OR  FEEDBACK ON THIS BODY THROUGH  THE PPRR COMMITTEE ON ITS  POSITIONS ON THOSE POLICIES. THAT WOULD THEN BE REPORTED BACK TO THE FULL BODY SO THAT THE  FULL BODY COULD CONSIDER THE  RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ITS POLICE  POLICY REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS CD THROUGH THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE BEFORE MAKING A FINAL  ADOPTIONN ALL OF THOSE  POLICIES AND SUBMITTING THEM  WITHIN A 30 DAY WINDOW AS WE'VE  DISCUSSED MULTIPLE TIMES TO THE  POLICE IMPLEMENTATION UNIT. SO THAT WAS THE INTENTION BEHIND THAT STRUCTURE. IT DIDN'T WORK INTS FIRST TIME THIS YEAR. WE DID HAVE THE COMMUNITY  ENGAGEMENT MEETING SCHEDULED BUT FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS THAT  MEETING DIDN'T HAPPEN. SO FOR THOSE AND I BELIEVE'M  GOING TO SPEAK FOR YOU, CHAIR  SCHANFIELD, BUT WE HAD INTENDED  FOR THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT  COMMITTEE FOR THAT PURPOSE, THE  COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE  DIDN'T HAVE A MEETING. WE DID NOT WANT TO LOSE THE  WINDOW, SO CHAIR SCHANFIELD HAD  BEEN AUTHORIZED BY A PREVIOUS  MOTION BY THIS BODY TO SUBMIT  THE FEEDBACK JUST IN CASE. SO SHE DID THAT ON BEHALF OF THE POLICE POLICY REVIEW AND  RECOMMENDATIONS COMMITTEE. GOING FORWARD I BELIEVE IT IS T  PROCESS WHERE THE POLICE POLICY  REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS COMMITTEE TAKES UP AND MAKES REVIEW AND  RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE POLICY AS DRAFTED. IT'S NOTICED BY THE PUBLISHED  AGENDA. THE PUBLIC IS ASKED TO COME  SPEAK TO WHAT THE PP COMMITTEE HAD SUGGEST AND HAD GIVE ITS  FEEDBACK THEN THE COMMUNITY  ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE WOULD BRING ALL OF THAT BACK TO THE FULL  BODY. THEY WOULD REVIEW AND TAKE  SERIOUSLY THE FEEDBACK FROM THE  REVIEW AND THE PUBLIAND MAKE A FINAL REPORT. I WOULD ALSO NOTE, CHAIR  SCHANFIELD, YOU DIDN'T MENTION  THIS, BUT IT WAS ENCOURAGING I  BELIEVE TO HEAR FROM THE  IMPLEMENTATION UNIT THAT EVEN IF THIS BODY WERE TO SUBMIT ITS  RECOMMENDATIONS OUTSIDE OF THAT  30 DAY WINDOW, THE POLICE  IMPLEMENTATION UNIT WOULD ACCEPT THEM. SO THE PRESSURE TO COMPLETE  EVERYTHING AS WE DISCUSSED MANY  TIMES WITHIN THAT 30 DAY WINDOW  IS SOMEWHAT ALLEVIATED BECAUSE  WE WEREIVEN ASSURANCES, AND  CHAIR SCHANFIELD MAY WANT TO  SPEAK TO THIS, THAT EVEN OUTSIDE OF THAT WINDOW THEY WOULD TAKE  THE FEEDBACK FROM THE CCPO FROM  THIS BODY ON THEIR POLICY  DRAFTS. >> THAT'S RIGHT. IT WAS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY  WHO KINDLY ATTENDED OUR MEETING  AND SHE SAID THAT ANYTHING  THAT'S SUBMITTED TO THE  IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE DOES  HAVE TO BE REVIEWED WHETHER OR  NOT IT'S WITHIN THE WINDOW. TO YOUR INT, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. TIME HAS EXPIRED. >> IF THAT'S WRONG, WE WOULD  LIKE TO KNOW. THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THE ROOM  THAT KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT, SO IF THAT'S NOT THE CASE, PLEASE  DO LET US KNOW. >> TIME HAS EXPIRED ON THIS. I'D LIKE THE CLERK TO RECEIVE  ANDILE THE PPRR COMMITTEE  REPORT. THE COMMITTUNITY ENGAGEMENT  COMMITTEE DID NOT MEET THIS  MONTH. I'LL CHECK IF THERE ARE ANY  COMMENTS FROM THE CHAIR. >> NOT AT THIS TIME. BUT THE DESCRIPTION OF THE  PROCESS WOULD BE PLANNED FOR OUR FEBRUARY 17TH MEETING. >> THATOMPLETES THE REPORT FOR AGENDA TONIGHT. WE'RE UP TO NEW BUSINESS. WE HAVE A FEW ITEMS HERE. FIRST UP AN UPDATE ON THE CITY'S CONSENT DECREE WITH THE U.S.  DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. I'VE ALLOCATED TEN MINUTES FOR  THIS PRESENTATION. HERE TO PROVIDE THAT UPDATE IS  OUR CITY ATTORNEY, KRISTEN  ANDERSON. WELCOME.  THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. COMMISSIONERS, I HAVE WITH ME AN ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY IN MY  OFFICE. WE WEREN'T AWARE THAT WE ONLY  HAD TEN MINUTES SO WE HAVE  SLIDES THAT MAYBE WILL GO A  LITTLE BIT LONGER THAN TEN MINU. BUT YOU ALL ARE OBVIOUSLY AWARE  WE'VE ENTERED INTO A CONSENT  DECREE WITH THE FEDERAL  DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IT'S 170  SOME PAGE DOCUMENT. SOME PROVISIONS ARE IN THE SAME  NATURE BUT OVER AND ABOVE AND  THEN THERE ARE SOME NEW  PROVISIONS. SO WHAT OUR PRESENTATION WILL  TRY TO ADDRESS IS REALLY KIND OF THE BEST HITS OF THE NEW THINGS. SOME OF THEM, YOU WILL BE LIK  THAT DOESN'T SEEM ALL THAT NEW. BUT THE THINGS THAT WE THINK ARE MOST NOTABLE ABOUT THE CONSENT  DECREES. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO ADAM TO  COVER THE FIRST FEW SLIDES. >> I'LL START WITH THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SECTION, WE WILL BE  IMPLEMENTING A  COMMUNITY-ORIENTED APPROACH TO  POLICING. SECONDLY, I WOULD SAY THE  HIGHLIGHT OF THIS SECTION WOULD  BE FOR CERTAIN CATEGORIES AND  POLICIES LIKE USE OF FORCE FOR  EXAMPLE, THERE WOULD BE A 45 DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. THIS IS SIMILAR TO THE BUCKETS  IN THE STLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT HAVE A SIMILAR COMMENT PERIOD. THE NEXT SECTION IS USE OF  FORCE. IT HAS A THREE-LEVEL SYSTEM LIKE THE SETTLEMT AGREEMENT. THERE'S SOME DIFFERENCES THERE  THAT WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. THE PRIMARY HIGHLIGHT OF THIS SECTION IS THE LEVELS OF  ACCOUNTABILITY. THE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF REVIEW  THAT ARE ADDED FROM WHAT THE  SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT HAD. THERE WOULD BE A 15 FOR EXAMPLE  FORCE INVESTIGATION TEAM THAT  WOULD BE INVESTIGATING USES OF  FORCE. THERE WOULD ALSO BE THINGS LIKE  A FOR REVIEW BOARD THAT WILL  LOOK AT TRENDS AND ANALYSES AS  WELL AS REPRESENTATIVE EXAMPLES  OF CERTAIN USES OF FORCE.FAIR A  SECTION. THE HIGHLIGHT OF THIS SECTION  WILL BE THAT MP WILL CREATE A  PLAN TO ADDRESS HOW ENFORCEMENT  STRATEGIES ADDRESS CONCERNS AND  SIGNIFICANT RACIAL DISPARITIES. THERE'S A SPECIFIC SECTION FOR  INTERACTIONS WITH YOUTH. IT HAS CERTAIN THINGS LIKE  POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR USES  OF FORCE AS WELL AS REQUIRING  SPECIFIC TRAININGS FOR HOW TO  INTERACT WITH YOUTH. IT WILL ALSO INCLUDE ENGAGING  THEM IN SOME FORM OR ANOTHER. ENGAGING PEOPLE WITH EXPERTISE  DEALING WITH YOUTH IN SOME FORM  OR ANOTHER IN DEVELOPING THOSE  TRAININGS. LAST ON THIS SLIDE I BODY-WORN  CAMERAS, THE PRIMARY HIGHLIGHT  FOR THIS WOULD BE MOVING FROM  SORT OF A 30 SECOND AUDIO  CAPTURE FROM WHEN THE BODY-WORN  CAMERAS ENGAGE TO NOW A MINUTE  INTO THE PAST. AND THIS IS SORRY VIDEO. SORRY I APOLOGIZE, VIDEO  CAPTURE, NOT AUDIO. AN THIS IS IN LINE WITH WHAT  THE STATE TROOPERS DO CURRENTLY. IT INCLUDES LIKE AN INCIDENT  COMMAND FOR FIRST AMENDMENT  AMENDMENT ENGAGING PERHAPS WITH  THE LEADER OF THAT PROTEST,  ESTABLISHING SOME LINES OF  COMMUNICATION, THERE ARE  RESTRICTIONS ON DISPERSAL ORDERS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. THERE'S PROTECTIONS FOR  JOURNALISTS AS WELL AS POLICE  ACTIVITY AND WHAT THEY'RE  ALLOWED TO DO AS WELL. NOT ADDRESSED TO THIS LEVEL AT  ALL IN THEETTLEMENT AGREEMENT  AND PROVIDES ADDITIONAL  PROTECTIONS FOR FIRST AMENDMENT  RELATED ACTIVITY. >>HE NEXT SECTION I'D LIKE TO  TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IS A  SECTION THAT ISASICALLY NEW IN THE CONSENT DECREE. THERE'S ONE PARAGRAPH ABOUT  BEHAVIORAL HEALTH RESPONSE. IT'S A VERY SHORT PARAGRAPH WITH NOT A LOT OF MEAT ON THE BONES. BUT ONE OF THE BIG FEATURES OF  THE DOJ INVESTIGATION REALLY  DELVED AITTLE BIT MORE  SPECIFICALLY INTO ALTERNATIVES  TO POLICING AND PARTICULARLY FOR MENTAL HEALTH-RELATED CALLS. THIS SECTION IN THE CONSENT  DECREE IS PRETTY ROBUST. IT BUILDS ON A LOT OF THE MENTAL CRISIS RESPONSE CAPACITY THAT  THE CITY ALREADY HAS. WE ALREADY HAVE 24/7 RESPONSE. BUT THE WAY THE CONSENT DECREE  LOOKS AT THIS SECTION IS A VERY  INTERDISCIPLINARY WAY. WE HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR OUR  MOBILE CRISIS RESPONDER. WE HAVE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS  FOR TRAINING FOR MPD. ALL OFFICERS WILL GET MORE  TRAINING AND THEN THERE WILL B  A SORT OF SPECIAL VOLUNTARY  GROUP OF ADVANCED DIRTORS IN  CHARGE OF THAT PROGRAM. IN 911 SIMILARLY, EVERY 911 CALL TAKER AND DISPATCHER WILL HAVE  ADVANCED TRAINING ON RESPONDING  TO CALLS RELATED TO MENTAL  HEALTH ISSUES BUT WITHIN THE 911 SEGMENT, THERE WILL BE AGAIN AN  ADDITIONAL CADRE OF FOLKS WITHIN THAT GROUP TT HAVE EXPERT  TRAINING SO THAT THERE WILL BE  FOLKS WITHIN 911 WHO HAVE  SPECIFIC EXPERTISE TO HELP  OTHERS DEAL WITH THOSE CRISIS  CALLS WITHI MPD DEPENDING ON  AVAILABILITY IT COULD BE ONE OF  THOSE ADVANCED TRAINED OFFICERS  THATOES OUT TO THE FIELD. BUT AGAIN EVERYBODY WILL GET  ADDITIONAL TRAINING. AND THEN THERE ARE SOME CALLS  THAT DO HAVE A LAW ENFORCEMENT  COMPONENT TO IT AND ALSO A  MENTAL HEALTH COMPONENT. SO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SPECIALISTS AND MPD OFFICERS ARE GOING TO BE TRAINED TOGETHER AND WL  RESPOND TO THOSE SITUATIONS. AND ALL OF THE TRAINING THAT'S  BEING DONE WITH ALL OF THESE  FOLKS AGAIN IS VERY CROSS  FUNCTIONAL, CROSS DEPARTMENTAL  NOT ONLY WITH 911 AND PD AND THE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOLKS BUT ALSO WITH THE EMTS AND WITH FIRE. AGAIN WE'RE HAVING MORE OF AN  ECOSYSTEM TYPE OF APPROACH TO  BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INCIDENTS. ANOTHER SECTION THAT HAS SEEN  SOME AMOUNT OF CHANGE IS THE  MISCONDUCT AND ACCOUNTABILITY  SECTION. WE STILL WILL HAVE AS YOU'RE  VERY, VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE TWO TRACKS OF OPCR HAVING  INVESTIGATORY AUTRITY OVER  COMMUNITY COMPLAINTS AND  INTERNAL AFFAIRS HAVING  INVESTIGATIVE AUTHORITY OVER  EMPLOYEE COMPLAINTS OR OFFICER  COMPLAINTS. BUT THE PROTOCOLS WILL BE  SOMEWHAT ENHANCED. THERE'S CALL OUTS FOR SPECIFIC  SITUATIONS IN WHICH CASES CAN BE DISMISSED PRIOR TO  INVESTIGATION. ONE OF WHICH ACTUALLY INCLUDES A SITUATN WHERE AN OFFICER  ESSENTIALLY KIND OF WANTS TO  PLEAD GUILTY AND ACCT A  PUNISHMENT. AND THAT WOULD JUSTIFY NOT GOING THROUGH THE ENTIRE REVIEW  PROCESS. THERE'S A VERY SPECIFIC LIS OF  SORTS OF OFFENSES THAT WOULD BE  ELIGIBLE FOR THAT. EN THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS,  AGAIN VERY, VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE HAVE NO I THINK PROBABLY THE BIGGEST  DIFFERENCE IS THAT AT THE END OF THE INVESTIGATO PROCESSES, THE IAD COMMANDER OR THE OPCR  DIRECTOR WILL ACTUALLY BE MAKING RECOMMENDED FINDINGS WITH  RESPECT TO POLICY. AND IT'S FOUR OPTIONS,  SUSTAINED, UNSUSTAINED,  EXONERATED, AND THE FOURTH THAT  I CAN'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF  MY HEAD. THIS IS ACTUALLY IN LINE WITH  BEST PRACTICES. AND JUST REALLY CLEAR FOR THIS  GROUP, WHEN THOSE  RECOMMENDATIONS GO TO THE REVIEW PANEL, THEY ARE NOT FINDING ON  THE REVIEW PANEL. THEY'RE THERE TO TRY TO GIVE  SOME SORT OF GUIDANCE TO THE  REVIEW PANEL ESPECIALLY TO TRY   FOR THE CIVILIAN REVIEWERS ON THE REVIEW PANEL TO HAVE A  LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION  ABOUT WHAT SORTS OF POLICIES ARE ACTUALLY IMPLICATED. BUT THE REVIEW PANEL IS NOT  BOUND BY THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS. THE REVIEW PANEL WILL STILL GET  THE FULL SCOPE OF THE  INFORMATION WILL BE ABLE TO  REVIEW ALL OF THE INFORMATION,  DE NOVO AND COME UP WITH THEIR  OWN RECOMMENDATION. IF THE RECOMMENDATION ACTUALLY  DEPARTS WITH THE RECMENDATION  OF THE DIRECTOR, THAT'S OKAY. AND THE REVIEW PANEL WILL SIMPLY HAVE TO JUST DOCUMENT. DOES THAT MEAN THAT I'M DONE WITH MY PRESENTATION? >> I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR ANOTHER TEN MINUTESOR THE  CITY ATTORNEY'S PRESENTATION ON  THE FEDERAL CONSENT DECREE. >> SECOND. >> YES. >> PLEASE CONTIN. >> THANK YOU. I'M SORRY, I'M A LITTLE LONG  WINDED SOMETIMES. SUPERVISION IS -- ADAM MENTIONED BEFORE THERE ARE SOME BIG BUCKET POLICIES THAT GET A 45 DAY  COMMENT PERIOD. A FUTURE OF THE CONSENT DECREE   IN FACT ALL OF THE POLICIES  THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE CONSENT DECREE THAT DON'T FALL UNDER  THOSE BIG BUCKETS STILL HAVE TO  GO THROUGH A REVIEW AND COMMENT PERIOD. AND YOU CAN IMAGINE THERE ARE  MANY, MANY, MANY POLICIES THAT  ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED UNDER  THE CONSENT DECREE AND THEY WILL ALL GET A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. SUPERVISION, THIS IS AIN  DIFFERENT FROM THE SETTLEMENT  AGREEMENT. THERE IS A SPECIFIC CALL UP FOR  A REQUIRENT THAT FOR  SUPERVISION THERE'S WHAT WE CALL UNITY OF COMMAND AND SPAN OF  CONTROL. SO THAT MEANS THAT UNDER THE  CONSENT DECREE, SUPERVISORS ARE  REQUIRED TO SUPERVISOR NO MORE  THAN EIGHT OFFICERS AND BE  SCHEDULED ON THE MAIN. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S SOME -- IN THE MAIN SUPERVISO ARE TO BE  SCHEDULED FOR THE SAME SCHEDULES AS THE OFFICERS THAT THEY  SUPERVISE SO THISHOLE SYSTEM  REALLY DEPENDS ON GOOD  SUPERVISION. SO THIS IS A REALLY BIG FEATURET ADDRESSED IN THE SETTLEMENT  AGREEMENT. RECRUITMENT AND HIRING IS  SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT IN THE  CONSENT DECREE. THE CITY IS REQUIRED UNDER THE  CONSENT DECREE TO HAVE A ROBUST  RECRUITMENT AND HIRING PLAN AND  PROGRAM. OFFICER WELLNESS IS ADDRESSEDN THE CONSENT DECREE VERY  SIMILARLY TO THE SETTLEMENT  AGREEMENT AND DATA, DATA, DATA. THAT'S HOW WE SHOW COMPLIANCE. THAT'S THE VERY QUICK RUN DOWN  OF AN EXTREMELY COMPLICATED  DOCUMENT THAT'170 PAGES LONG. SO A VERY HIGH-LEVEL THUMBNL  OF WHAT I WOULD SAY ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN  THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND THE CONSENT DECREE. >> THANK YOU FOR THAT REPORT. I WOULD ASK WHAT WERE THE  CHANGES IF ANY FOR CCPO WITHIN  THIS CONSENT DECREE? >> MADAM CHAIR, THE CONSENT  DECREE DOES TALK ABOUT THE CCPO. IT TKS ABOUT THE CCPO BEING  STAFFED AND SUPPORTED. I THINK SUBSTANTIVELY IS NOT  VERY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT'S IN  THIS AGREEMENT, BUT IT'S CLED  OUT SPECIFICALLY IN THE CONSENT  DECREE. >> ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER SCNFIELD. >> I THOUGHT THERE WAS ONE PIECE IN THE CONSENT DECREE THAT I  MIGHT HAVE MISUNDERSTD IT, BUT THAT AFTER THE PANELS THAT WE  WOULD HEAR BACK FROM THE CHIEF. IS THAT ACCURATE OR COULD YOU  HELP ME UNDERSTAND THAT PART A  LITTLE BITETTER? >> I HAVE TO SAY, COMMISSIONER,  I'M GOING TO HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT. I DON'T RECALL THAT OFF THE TOP  OF MY HEAD. I DO KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT IF  THE CHIEF DEPARTS FROM THE  RECOMMENDATIONS OF E PANEL, HE NEEDS TO DOCUMENT THAT. I DON'T RECALL THAT THOSE  RATIONALES GO BACK TO THE PANEL. >> COULD WE LEARN FROM WHEN THE  CHIEF DEPARTS, WE'D REALLY LIKE  TO UNDERSTAND THAT AS A FULL  CIRCLE OF FEEDBACK. >> MADAM COMMISSIONER, I THINK  MAYBE WHAT YOU'RE REMEMBENG  BUT I'M NOT REMEMBERING,  OBVIOUSLY INDIVIDUAL CASES WHEN  THERE'S PRIVATE PERSONAL DATA,  THAT CAN'T GET BACK TO, BUT  THERE IS A PROVISION IN THE  CONSENT DECREE. THERE'S A LOT OF DATA PROVISIONS THAT ARE VERY HIGH LEVEL,  STATISTICAL SORT OF DATA WHERE  THERE WILL BE REPORTING ON LIKE  HOW MANY TIMES DID THE CHIEF  DEPART FROM THE RECOMMENDATIONS  OF THE PANEL. SO AGAIN YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE  ABLE TO FIGURE OUT WEL THAT WAS MY CASE OR NOT BECAUSE OF THE  DATA PRACTICES ACT. BUT IT WILL BE KINDF A  HIGH-LEVEL STATISTICAL REPORTING IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE THINKING  OF. >> I DO RECALL THAT BEING SENT. COMMISSIONER SMITH. >> TWO BRIEF QUESTIS. THE FIRST IS TO CLARIFY ONCE A  PANEL MAKES A RECOMMENDATION, IT GOES STRAIGHT TO THE CHIEF. THE SUPERVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS  THAT COME IN TO THE PANEL, IT  DOESN'T GO BACK TO THEM FOR  THEIR REVIEW BEFORE IT GOES TO  THE -- >> NO, IT MIGHT GO BACK TO THE  SUPERVISOR JUST TO SORT OF CHECK THE BOX, BUT THE SUPERVISOR DOES NOT CHANGE THEIR RECOMMENDATION  OR ANYTHING ABOUT THE PANEL  RECOMMENDATION. THEHOLE PACKAGE THEN GETS  PICKED UP AND PROVIDED TO THE  CHIEF FOR HIS ULTIMATE  DETERMINATION. >> THANK YOU. AND COULD YOU ALSO BRIEFLY  DESCRIBE THE OFFUTY RELATED  PROVISIONS IN THE CONSENT  DECREE. >> YES, SO THERE ARE A FEW  PROBABLY THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IS THAT ONE OF THE FINDINGS OF THE  DOJ WAS THAT THERE'S SORT OF AN  INHERENT CONICT OF INTEREST, I DON'T MEAN THAT IN A LEGAL TERM  OF WORD, BUT THE CURRENT SYSTEM  ALLOWS FOR SUBORDINATE OFFICERS  TO SCHEDULE SUPERIOR OFFICERS  FOR OFF DUTY WORK ASSIMENTS. SO ONE OF THE PROVISIONS IN THE  CONSENT DECREE IS THAT THAT  CAN'T HAPPEN ANYMORE. SO THERE'S A BAR ON BASICALLY  SCHEDUNG YOUR SUPERVISORS. ERE'S ALSO I THINK PROVISIONS  IN OFF DUTY THAT THERE'S MORE  AGAIN DATA COLLECTION. THERE'S AN HOURS CAP THAT'S  ACTUALLY THE SAME HOURS CAP THAT EXISTS IN THE SETTLEMENT  AGREEMENT. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER CANADAY. >> THANK YOU FOR THE  PRESENTATION. IT WAS VERY HELPFUL. THERE WAS ALREADY A REFERENCE  HERE TONIGHT TO SOME STATEMENTS  THAT HAVE BEEN MADE ABOUT THE  CITY BEING COMMITTED TO THE  TERMS OF THE CONSENT DECREE  REGARDLESS OF WHAT HAPPENS WITH  COURT APPROVAL. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN  SAY ABOUT WHERE WE'RE AT IN THE  PROCESS ON THAT ISSUE? >> COMMISSIONER MEMBERS, SO WE   JUSTICE A JOINT MOTION BEFORE  THE FEDERAL COURT, PAUL MAGNUSON IS THE JUDGE ASSIGNED ON THE  CASE. THEY NEED TIME TO REVIEW THE  TERIALS WHICH IS  UNDERSTANDABLE GIVEN THAT IT'S A 170 PAGE DOCUMENT. BUT AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, WE  FEDERAL COURT. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAS  NOT TAKEN ANY OTHER ACTION. SO MY GO TO RIGHT NOW IS THAT  I'M IN FEDERAL COU AND I'M  FIGHTING IN FAVOR OF THIS  CONSENT DECREE.I DON'T HAVE CON  MIGHT HAPPEN, I KNOW THAT WE  HAVE PRESENTED THE COURT WITH  WHAT I THINK IS A REALLY, REALLY GOOD DOCUMENT AND A VERY, VERY  DEFENSIBLE DOCUMENT IN TERMS OF  ASKING THE COURT TO HAVE FEDERAL OVERSIGHT. IF THE WORST COMES TO PASS AND  THE COURT DOESN'T APPROVE IT FOR SOME REASON OR SOMETHI GOES  WRONG, I THINK YOU'VE HEARD THE  CITY SAY MANY TIMES, WE ARE  COMMITTED TO DOING THE WORK. WE PREFER TO DO THE WORK WITH  FEDERAL COURTOVERSIGHT. BUT WE WILL DO THE WORK. WE HAVE A GREAT MONITOR IN PLACE AND I THINK THE MONITOR IS READY TO MONITOR US DOING THE WORK  REGARDLESS OF THE SITUATION. BUT I THINK THAT HAVING A  FEDERAL ORDER IS A REALLY  VALUABLE THING. AND SO THAT'S MY POSITION. >> I WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE WE  HAVE ELEFA HERE IN THE ROOM. DIRECTOR DOUGLAS IS IN THE BACK. JUST WAN TO RECOGNIZE THAT. COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. I THINK BETWEEN YOUR PRESENTATI  COMMISSIONERS, NAILED IT. SO MANY OF MY QUESTIONS AFTER I  READ THE DECREE THE FIRST TIME  THROUGH HAVE BEEN ADDRESD. I'VE GOT A VERY SPECIFIC ONE FOR YOU AND I WILL FOLLOW UP WITH AN EMAIL. IF YOU'VE BEEN HERE FOR THE ♪RET OF THE MEETING WHICH I THINK YOU HAVE, I HAVE A VERY STRONG  CONCERN ABOUT THE REVIEW PANELS  AND THE POOL. SOMETHING THAT JUMPS OUT AT ME,  PAGE 100, THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT POLICE OVERSIGHT REVIEW  PANELS MUST PRIOR TO  DELIBERATIONS BE PROVIDED ORA  INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO EVALUATE  AND WEIGH EVIDENCE. AND RIGHT NOW AS DIRECTOR  PHILLIPS IS AWARE, WE DON'T HAVE ANY SPECIFIC TRAINING FOR REVIEW PANELS. WE DID HAVE A TRAINING THAT WAS  PROVIDED AT OUR DECEMBER MEETING AFTER I HAD POINTED OUT THAT I  HAD NEVER SEEN ANY TRAINING  ABOUT A PARTICULAR PANEL. SO I WOULD BE INTERESTED. AGAIN I WILL OFFER UP AN  INTERPRETATION OF WHAT ORAL  INSTRUCTIONS, I'M GOING TO GUESS AT IT WOULDN'T BE EVERY SINGLE PANEL, BUT I WOULD STRONGLY,  STRONGLY URGE THE CITY TO FOLLOW UP WITH THAT ORAL BIT. IN OTHER WORDS, I WOULD LOVE TO  SEE THAT OFFERED AS A STAND  ALE TRAINING, MUCH LIKE YOUR  TRAINING. >> COMMISSIONER, I'LL GIVE YOU  MY INTERPRETATION; AT THE END OF THE DAY IT IS THE MONITOR WHO  WILL TELL US WHA THIS PROVISION MEANS. BUT I DO THINK WHAT WAS REALLY  INTENDED ON PAGE 100 IS KIND OF  LIKE JURY INSTRUCTIONS THAT  WOULD TRULY ORALLY HAPPEN AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF EVERY REVIEW  PANEL. SO IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE LONG  AND IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE  COMPLICATED. BUT THE CONSENT DECREE LAYS OUT  THE SPECIFIC THINGS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED IN TERMS OF NOT  CONSIDERING ANYTHING OTHER THAN  THE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU, ET  CETERA. BUT I THINK THE IDEA AGAIN IS  REALLY LIKE JURY INSTRUCTIONS  THAT WOULD BE GIVEN TO ANY JURY  TO KIND OF EVEN IF YOU'VE SAT ON OTHER JURIES BEFORE.  OKAY, WE HAVE TWIS
EXHAUSTED T  TIME ON THIS REPORT. >> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR AN EXTRA TWO MINUTES.I JUST HAV  QUICK QUESTIONS THAT GO TO THE  CONSENT DECREE SO I'D LIKE TO  MAKE THAT MOTION. >> IS THERE A SECOND? >> TWO EXTRA MINUTES.  SECOND FOR TWO MINUTES. >> ANY DISCUSSION? >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY YES. >> YES. >> YES, LET'S HAV IT. COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> I DON'T EXPECT YOU TO ANSWER  THESE TODAY. I DO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR A  TERRIFIC PRESENTATION. I HOPE WE CAN GET THE POWEOINT SO THAT WE CAN GO THROUGH THAT. I UNDERSTAND THAT ON EITHER FEB  SURE, YOU'LL BE MAKING A  PRESENTATION TO THE CITY  COUNCIL. AND IF SO WILL IT BE PRETTY MUCH WHAT YOU'VE PRESENTED TO US? >> COMMISSIONER, SO WE GAVE THIS PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ALREADY, IT WAS BEFORE THE  SUBCOMMITTEE, NDHR SUBCOMMITTEE  OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. IT WAS IN JANUARY, MID-JANUARY  OR SO. AND SO OBVIOUSLY I TOOK A LITTLE BIT, WE TOOK A LITTLE BIT MORE  TIME DURING TT PRESENTATION. SO IT WOULD BE VERY EASY FOR US  TO PROVIDE THAT ONE TO YOU AND  YOU CAN WATCH THE LONGER  PRESENTATION. >> THAT WOULD BE GREAT. I'M NOT SURE IF YOU'RE AWARE  THAT COMMISSIONER PHIL STURM  RESIGNED BECAUSE HE HAD GREAT  NCERNS WITH WHAT HE BELIEVES  ARE AN INCONCIONABLE BASICALLY  CONFLICT OF INTEREST. I'M NOT SURE IF YOU COULD  ADDRESS THAT OR COME BACK IN  MARCH, I SHARE THOSE CONCERNS. NONE OF US WANTS TO GO THROUGH  THE MANY AREAS OF GOING THROUGH  A REVIEW PANEL AND THEN HAVE IT  COMPROMISED. SO IF YOU COULD ADDRESS HIS  CONCERNS AND WHETHER YOU AGREE  WITH HIM OR DISAGREE WITH HIM,  AND IF YOU DISAGREE WITH HIM,  WHY. AND FINALLY, I WANT TO SAY  SOMETHING ABOUT THE 16 HOUR  LIMIT THAT WOULD BE FOR OFF DUTY AND ON DUTY, I FIND THAT  INCREDIBLY TROUBLING. I DON'T WANT TO HAVE A SURGEON  OPERATE ON ME GOING INTO THEIR  16th HOUR OR 15th HOUR. AND WHAT THAT TELLS ME IS THE  DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAUDED THE 16 HOURIMITATION IN THE  PRESENTATION IT GAVE ON  JANUARY 14TH. IT TELLS ME THAT OFFICERS ARE  WORKING MORE THAN THAT. SO AGAIN IF WE COULD GET A  LITTLE MORE CLARIFICATION ON HOW SUCH A LARGE NUMBER WAS GIVEN THAT ALLOWS POLICE OFFICERS TO  WORK 16 STRAIGHT HOURS IN A DAY. I KNOW YOU CAN'T DIVULGE THE  DISCUSSIONS, BUT WHAT WERE SOME  OFHE RATIONALE? IT DOESN'T SEEM LIMITING TO ME  AND IT'S VERY TROUBLING. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. EXPIRED TIME.THANK YOU, ATTORNE. WE APPRECIATE YOU. I'LL ORDER THE CLERK TO RECEIVE  AND FILE THAT REPORT. NEXT IS A REPORT ABOUT REVIEW  PANEL TRAING AND SCHEDULING  ISSUES. I'VE ALLOCATED TEN MINUTES FOR  THIS RORT WHICH WILL BE  PRESENTED BY DIRECTOR FUJISAWA. >> I DON'T ENVISIONHIS TAKING  THE FULL TEN MINUTES, BUT JUST  NTED TO DO A QUICK  PRESENTATION ON PANELS  SPECIFICALLY. SOME PROCEDURES THERE AND  SCHEDULING WITH SE QUESTIONS  THAT WERE PRESENTED RECENTLY. WE'LL TALK ABOUT THE REVIEW  DATES, THE COMPOSITION WHICH I  KNOW WAS A QUESTION WHICH WAS  PARTIALLY ADDRESSED EARLIER AND  THEN THE QSTION AROUND CASE  ROUTING WHICH ALSO DID BRIEFLY  JUST ARISE. AS WE'VE DISCUSSED, THE 2025  CALENDAR HAS BEEN ADOPTED. IT INCLUDES 46 REVIEW PANEL  SESSIONS. YOU CAN SEE THE SECOND AND  FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF EACH MONTH,  THE FIRST AND THIRD FRIDAY WITH  A COUPLE OF EXCEPTIONS. WE HAVE HAD A NUMBER GOING BACK  INTO DECEMBER, A NUMBER OF THOSE PANEL DATES WHERE W HAD TWO  PANELS HELD CONCURRENTLY. SO THIS IS THE MINIMUM, THE 46  THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT WITH THE  EIGHT ELIGIBLE THAT WE HAVE NOW  WITH THE RECRUITMENT TO FILL THE THREE SEATS AND THEN POTENTIAL  FUTURE SEATS. WE ARE REALLY DOING AS MUCH AS  WE CAN LOGISTICALLY AND FROM A  STAFFING PERSPECTIVE TO SUPPORT  AS MANY PANELS AS POSSIBLE. WE ALREADY DO HAVAS I  MENTIONED EARLIER, I THINK THE  15th OF FEBRUARY IS A DATE WHER  SCHEDULED SO THAT IS A SATURDAY. THAT IS CAO IS PARTICIPATING, WE HAVE STAFF TO LEAD IN. WE'REETTING THOSE CASE FILES. SO WE CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE  CCPO AND WITH COMMISSIONERS TO  MAKE SURE THIS HAPPENS. AS CASES GO THROUGH, WE NEED THE CASES TO GO SOMEWHERE AND FOR  PANEL SESSIONS TO BE HELD AND  COMMISSIONERS TO REVIEW THEM. SO APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS. CONTINUE TO REPLY TO THE POLLS  BECAUSE THAT REALLY HELPS US  PLAN ACCORDINGLY AND GET  MATERIALS OUT AHEAD OF THE SEVEN DAY LEAD TIME THAT WE STRIVE  FOR. COMPOSITION OF THOSE PANELS, I  THINK EVERYBODY KNOWS PER THE  ORDINANCE, IT IS THREE CIVILIAN  COMMISSIONERS WITH TWO SWO  MEMBERS AT THE RANK OF  LIEUTENANT OR HIGHER. AS WE DISCUSSED WITH EIGHT  ELIGIBLE COMMISSIONERS TO SIT ON PANEL PER THE REQUIREMENTS IN  THE ORDINANCE, THE ELIGIBLE  SWORN POOL IS COMPOSED OF 14  COMMANDERS AND 18 LIEUTENANTS. WE HAVE WORKED WH THE DEPUTY  CHIEF OF OPERATIONS WITHIN MPD  TO SET UP A ROTATING SCHEDULE OF THIS POOL OF OFFICERS SO THAT I  THINK IT'S EITHER A FOUR OR A  SIX WEEK ROTATION AND THEN AFTER ONE CYCLE, THEY WILL BE  STAGGERED SO THA THOSE SWORN  MEMBERS ARE NOT PAIRED UP FOR  SUBSEQUENT PANEL REVIEWS. AND THESE ARE SCHEDULED  THROUGHOUT THE CALENDAR YEAR  THAT MATCH UP WITH THE ADOPTED CALENDAR. SO WE ARE TRACKING PARTICIPATION ON THE SWORN SIDE AS WELL AS  PARTICIPATION ON THE CIVILIAN  COMMISSION SIDE. AND WE WILL HAVE THAT DA AND  WE WILL TRACK IT INTERNALLY AND  POTENTIALLY IT CAN BE SHARED  WITH THIS BODY. A QUESTION AROUND CASE ROUTING,  AND I KNOW THIS CAME UP  PREVIOUSLY. I THINK IT'S VERY CLEAR. SO RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE MADE BY THE PANEL DO COME BACK TO THE OFFICE OF POLICE CONDUCT REVIEW  BECAUSE THE OFFICE OF POLICE  CONDUCT REVIEW IS THE SHEPHERD  FOR THOSE CASE MATERIALS TO AND  FROM PANEL. WE TAKE THE MATERIALS, I RECEIVE TH MATERIALS, CONFIRM THAT A  RECOMMENDATION HAS BEEN MADE AND THAT THE CASE HAS NOT BEEN  REMANDED. THAT IS THE EXTENT OF MY REVIEW. AND THEN THOSE FILESRE SAVED  AS A PDF UPLOADED TO THE CASE  FILE, UPLOADED TO THE SHAREPOINT AND THOSE MATERIALS ARE THEN  PROVIDED TO THE CHIEF, HIS  STAFF, AND INTERNAL AFFAIRS AS  WELL AS THEY ARE THE SHEPHERDS  OF CASE MATERIALS WITH THE  CHIEF'S OFFICE. AT NO POINT IS ANYBODY CHANGING  A RECOMMENDATION OR ABLE TO DO  SO. SO HOPEFULLY THAT CLARIFIES SOME QUESTIONS AND SOME AMBIGUITY  THAT WAS OUT THERE. I KNOW DURING THE PPRR  CONVERSATION, THERE WAS SOME  QUESTION AROUND THAT OFFICE AT NO POINT IS ANYBODY WITHIN  THE OFFICE OF POLICE CONDUCT  REVIEW OR INTERNAL AFFAIRS  MAKING OR HAS T AUTHORITY TO  MAKE CHANGES ON THOSE  RECOMMENDAONS. WITH THAT, THAT IS ALL I HAVE. >> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER BASTICK. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. AS YOU KNOW I'VE BEEN EMAILING  YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ANSWERING  ALL OF MY QUESTIONS. I AM GOING TO ASK YOU FOR, I'VE  JUST SIGNED UP FOR THAT  FEBRUARY 15TH PANEL BY THE WAY. SO IT SOUNDS AS THOUGH THERE  WERE TWO BACK TO BACK, WHEN I  SAY BACK TO BACK, TWO CASES. SOME OF US JUST WENT THROUGH A  REALLY, REALLY PRETTY HEAVY DUTY DOUBLE CASE THE OTHER DAY. I WOD LIKE TO ASK THAT BECAUSE OF THE ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF REVIEW THAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO DO, IT'S  NOT ONLY THE WRITTEN MATERIALS,  BUT THE BODY-WORN CAMERA FOOTAGE THAT IN AN INSTANCE WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO GIVE US BACK TO BACK  CASES THAT YOU PLEASE GIVE US  MORE TIME THAN AWEEK. SO YOU'RE GIVING US SEVEN DAYS  RIGHT NOW FOR A SINGLE SE. IT DOESN MAKE ANY SENSE AND I  KNOW THAT FROM MY RECENT  EXPERIENCE. IF WE COULD GET ME TIME FOR  TWO CASES. IT WAS AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF  WORK. AND ALSO IF THAT CONSIDERATION  COULD BE GIVEN AS YOU PREPARE  THE MATERIALS TO TH AMOUNT OF  PAGES, READING WE HAVE TO DO,  AND THE AMOUNT OF FOOTAGE THAT  WE HAVE TO LOOK AT. AND ESPECIALLY IF THERE ARE  MULTIPLE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN  THE INCIDENT. BECAUSE OUR CASES HAD MULTIPLE  OFFICERS, BOTH CASES, AND WE HAD THREE DIFFERENT VIOLATIONS IN  THE SECOND CASE. AND EVERY SINGLE OFFICER, FOR  EVERY SINGLE VIOLATION HAS TO  HAVE A RECOMMENDATION. AND THAT WOULD BE MY REQUEST. SO AT LEAST MAYBE TEN DAYS FOR A BACK TO BAC CASE WOULD BE  GREAT. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> THANK YOU. I REALLY LOVE THE IA OF HAVING A SEPARATE REPORT ON THE PANELS. I THINK THAT'S VERY, VERY  HELPFUL AND I HOPE WE CONTINUE  THAT. AGAIN, I HAVEN'T READ THE ELEFA  REPORT. I READ ABOUT IT ON THE NPR. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THE  REPORTER WAS SAYING WAS THEY  FOUND PROBLEMS WITH STILL THE  BACKLOG AND DISCIPLINARY CASES  AND THEY ATTRIBUTE MOST OF THAT  TO STAFFING. IF THAT'S THE CASE, I HAVE  TROUBLE WITH THAT. IT HASN'T JUST BEEN STAFFING. IT'S BEEN TRAINING, IT'S BEEN  OTHER THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN  BROUGHT UP AT TODAY'S MEETING. SO I WE'RE GOING TO GET A  HANDLE ON GETTING BACKLOG CASES  TOGETHER, WE HAVE TO UNDERSTAND  THAT IWASN'T JUST A MATTER OF  STAFFING. WE HAVE THREE VACANCIES AND THEN WE HAVE ALL SORTS OF TERMS THAT  ARE COMING UP. AND I KNOW IT'S COMING UP IN THE NEXT PRESENTATION ABOUT  RECRUITMENT. BUT IT GOES TO THE PANELS. WE ARE NOT BEING HONEST WITH THE PUBLIC ABOUT WHAT THE TIME  COMMITMENT IS FOR THIS  COMMISSION. AND WE HAVE AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT  OF POWERS THAT ARE  DISCRETIONARY. WE'VE TAKEN SOME ON INCLUDING  WE'LL BE DISCUSSING THE POLICE  CHIEF'S REVIEW. BUT NOBODY IS TELLING THE PUBLIC THE AMOUNT OF HOURS THAT IS  VOLVED IN PREPARING THESE  CASES FOR REVIEW, REVIEWING  HOURS, SOMETIMES DOZENS OF HOURS OF BODY-WORN CAMERA. WE PUT OUT A VIDEO THAT DOESN'T  GET INTO THIS. SO I WANT TO KNOW IS OPCR  COMMITTED TO PUTTING OUT A FACT  THIS SIX MONTH RECRUITING PERIOD THAT LETS PEOPLE KNOW WHAT THE  TIME COMMITMENT IS? IT'S IMPORTANT. WE DON'T WANT TO GET PEOPLE  EXCITED ABOUT THIS AND THEN COME IN HERE AND SAY OH MY GOD, I  WORK TWO JOBS OR THREE JOBS, I  CAN'T COMMIT THIS KIND OF  SCHEDULE AND D WORK ON THE  COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE  AND THE PPRR COMMITTEE AND CE  TO THE MEETINGS AND PREPARE FOR  THAT. WE HAVE A DIFFERENT MANDATE THAN ANY OTHER COMMISSION THAT I'VE  SEEN. AND WE NEED TO BE HONEST ABOUT  THAT. SO CAN WE GET A FACT SHEET OUT  AND IF YOU NEED PEOPLE TO  VOLUNTEER FOR THAT, LET US KNOW, THAT REALLY DEFINES THE  COMMITMENT OF HOURS. THAT IS THE SINGLE BIGGEST  QUESTION THAT I AM GETTING FROM  PEOPLE WHO ARE INTERESTED ALL  ACROSS THE CITY ABOUT APPLYING  FOR CCPO VACANCIES. >> I CAN APPRECIATE THAT,  ABSOLUTELY. ESPECIALLY WITH THE BODY OF WORK THAT'S COMING. I CAN LOOK AT IN GREATER DETAIL  THE RECRUITMENT AND SOME OF THE  DETAILS THERE IF THAT'S EXPLICI. I DO KNOW IN CONVERSATIONS WITH  ELEFA AND MDHR ON THE  RECRUITMENT STRATEGY FOR THE  CCPO THAT THERE IS DISCUSSION OF A TIME COMMITMENT. I CAN'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF  MY HEAD EXACTLY WHAT THAT NUMBER IS SO I DON'T WANT TO MISSPEAK  HERE. BUT THAT  DEFINITELY SOMETHING THAT WE ARE ACTIVELY WORKING TO  COMMUNICATE WHEN HAVING THESE  CONVERSATIONS ABOUT WHAT THE  COMMITMENT LOOKS LIKE. >> AND I'LL JUST ADD TO THAT, IT IS A TIME COMMITMENT SO THE  CASES LOOK DIFFERENT. AS SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN HERE QUITE SOME TIME AND HAS SAT ON SEVERAL PANELS, THE TIME COMMITMENT IS  DIFFERENT DEPENDING ON THE CASE. BUT DURING THE INTERVIEW PROCESS THAT WAS EXTENSIVELY REPEATED IF YOU WANT TO MEET THAT TIME  COMMITMENT WHEN YOU APPLY. BUT IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR THE  COMMUNITY TO KNOW AN IDEA OF  WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE PER  MONTH. THE VIDEO I BELIEVE TEN HOURS  WAS WHAT I SAID PER MONTH. I THINK THAT'S PRETTY ACCURATE  IN TERMS OF A TIME COMMITMENT  FOR ME. BUT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> CAN WE GET THAT RIGHT NOW  DURING THE SIX WEEK RECRUITING  PERIOD? I DON'T WANT TO SEE THIS -- WE  HAVEN OPPORTUNITY THIS WEEK TO BE GIVING OUT INFORMATION AT THE COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS  CONFERENCE. CAN WE GET SOMETHING IN WRITING  THAT WILL HELP PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE TIME COMMITMENT IS EVEN IF IT'S JUST LAYING OUT ALL OF  THE DIFFERENT ROLES AND  RESPONSIBILITIES? >> I CAN SEE WHAT WE CAN DO TO  PUT TOGETHER SOME MATERIALS THAT WOULD HELP PEOPLE MAKE A  DECISION ON WHETHER OR NOT TO  EXESS INTEREST IN APPLYING. >> THANK YOU. APPRECIATE THAT. >> THANK YOU -- >> COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU  FOR A VERY WELL LAID OUT REPORT  BECAUSE IT'S GREAT INFORMATION. >> ALL THE TIME HAS EXPIRED ON  THIS AGENDA ITEM. I DIRECT THE CLERK TO RECEIVE  AND FILE THE REPORT. THE NEXT ITEM PERTAINS TO  MEMBERSHIP AND VACANCIES AND  WILL BE GIVEN BY THE CITY CLERK. I'LL RECOGNIZE THE CLERK FOR  THAT UPDATE. >> THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. PEFULLY AT YOUR SEATS YOU'VE  ALL RECEIVED THIS MEMO FROM ME. IT IS TITLED CCPO MEMBERSHIP  ISSUES. BASICALLY WHAT I'VE DONE IS  IDENTIFY THE FACT THAT THERE ARE CURRENTLY AS WE'VE SAID SEVERAL  TIMES THIS EVENING THREE CURRENT VACANCIES. THE ARE IN SEATS 1, 11, AND  12. THOSE ARE HIGHLIGHTED ON THE ME  INCLUDED ON THAT PIECE OF PAPER  IN FRONT OF YOU IN YELLOW. BUT WE ALSO KNOW THAT END OF  TERM VACANCIES ARE COMINGN  FIVE ADDITIONAL SEATS. THOSE ARE IN SEATS 2, 3, 6, 9,  AND 14. THOSE SEATS WILL EXPIRE THE  NATURAL TERMS ON MAY 31ST OF  THIS YEAR. THAT REFLECTS THIS BODY IS NOW  IN ITS SECOND YEAR IN  ESTABLISHING A BRAND NEW BOARD  ORCOMMISSION. IN ORDER TO STAGGER THE TERMS,  WE DIVIDE THE BOARD UP RANDOMLY  BY DRAWING LOTS AND ASSIGN A  FIRST ONE-YE TERM AND FIRST  TWO-YEAR TERM TO THE BOARD. HALF THE SEATS ARE ONE YEAR,  HALF THE SEATS ARE TWO YEARS. SO THE FIRST HALF OF THOSE  INITIAL TERMS HAVE EXPIRED AND  NEW MEMBERS HAVE BEEN APPOINTED. THE SECOND HALF OF THOSE, THOSE  MEMBERS WHO WERE INITIALLY  APPOINTED TO A TWO YEAR TERM,  THOSE TERMS WILL EXPIRE IN MAY  OF THIS YEAR. GOING FORWARD ALL APPOINTMENTS  LL BE FOR A FULL THREE YEAR  TERM. SO ONCE ESTABLISHED THE TERM IS  THREE FULL YEARS. YOU CAN SEE I'VE HIGHLIGHTED IN  BLUE ON THE MEMBERSHIP ROSTER  THOSE DITIONAL SEATS THAT WILL EXPIRE IN MAY OF THIS YEAR. SO AS HAS BEEN NOTED, IT IS OUR  INTENTION TO LEVERAGE THIS  CURRENT SIX WEEK RECRUITMENT  CAMPAIGN TO FIRST FILL THE  UNEXPIRED PORTIONS OF THE TERMS  FOR SEATS 1, 11, AND 12 THROUGH MAY. AND THEN TO HAVE THE POOL OF  POTENTIAAPPLICANTS AVAILABLE  TO FILL ALL OF THE VACANCIES  THAT WILL BE OCCURRING AT  MAY 31ST FOR BEGINNING TERMS OF  JUNE 1. I HAVE BN IN CORRESPONDENCE  WITH COMMISSIONER BASTICK OVER  THE LAST SEVERAL DAYS ABOUT  APPOINTMENTS AND SO TOOK THE  OPPORTUNITY TO CAPTURE SOME OF  HER QUESTIONS TO FILL IN THE  REST OF THE DETAILS THAT AREN'T  ON PAGE TWO. I WOULD HIGHLIG FOR YOUR  INFORMATION THAT I'VE INCLUDED A LINK ON THIS DOCUMENT TO THE  CCPO'S BOARD DETAILS PAGE IN  LIMS. FOR THE PUBLIC, I WOULD SAY YOU  COULD GET TO THIS PAGE BY TYPING INTO A BROWSER LIMS, THAT'S  L-I-M-S, lims.minneapolismn.gov. THAT'S THE HOME GE. AND IF YOU CLICK ON THE BOX THAT SAYS APPLY NOW, YOU CAN CLICK ON THE SEAT THAT YOU WISH TO APPLY  FOR AND ALLOW YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR APPLICATION NOW THROUGH I  BELIEVE THE PERIOD ENDS  MARCH 16TH. SO NOW THRGH MARCH 16TH. WE OPENED IT LAST FRIDAY. WE ARE CONDUCTING A SIX WEEK  RECRUITMENT PERIOD. AND ON THE BACK OF THE MEMO I  WOULD SAY AGAIN WVE DONE AN  EXTENSIVE RECRUITMENT EFFORT. THERE WAS A VIDEO THAT S  PRODUCED. THERE'S A WEBSITE ON THE CITY'S  MAIN PAGE THAT TALKS ABOUT THE  CCPO. APPRECIATE THE CHAIR AND MEMBERS WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE VIDEO TO PROMOTE THE CCPO. MEMBERS WHO ARE CURRENT MEMBERS  WHO WH TO BE CONSIDERED FOR  REAPPOINTMENT WILL STILL NEED TO FILL OUT AN APPLICATION FORM. THE POLICY ON ALL OF OUR BOARDS  AND COMMISSIONS IS WHETHER IT'S  A FIRST-TIME APPOINTMENT OR  REAPPOINTMENT, EVERYONE HAS TO  FILL OUT AN APPLICATION FORM. IF YOU ARE IN CURRENTLY ONE OF  THOSE SEATS THAT I'VE NAMED, YOU WILL HAVE TO FILL OUT AN  APPLICATION FORM TO BE  CONSIDERED FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO  BE CONSIDERED AT THE APPROPRIA TIME. I WILL ALSO NOTE THAT FOR EACH  TERM THAT SERVED, IT'S LIKE  ELECTED OFFICE. FOR EVERY APPOINTED TERM, EACH  COMMISSIONER WILL HAVE TO  COMPLETE A NEW OATH OF OFFICE. YOU'LL HAVE TO COMPLETE A  PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT. AND YOU'LL HAVE TO COMPLETE THE  REQUIRED TRAININGS WHICH  INCLUDES THE ORIENTATION AND THE MANDATED COD OF ETHICS TRAINING THAT ALL BOARD MEMBERS ARE  REQUIRED TO DO. I AM NOT SURE AS I INDICATED IN  MY MEMO IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS THAT COMMISSIONER BASTICK RAISED ABOUT TRAININGS MANDATED BY THE  ORDINANCE FOR CCPO MEMBERS. SO THAT WOULD BE A QUESTION FOR  THE CIVIL RHTS DEPARTMENT  AND/OR THE CITY ATTORNEY'S  OFFICE TO ADDRESS. MY ASSUMPTION IS THAT THO WILL BE AN ONGOING SERIES OF TRAININ  EVERY YEAR TO MAKE SURE THAT  COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TRAININGS WHETHERHAT'S A REUPPING OF AN  EXISTING TRAINING OR A NEW  TRAINING. AN THAT TRAINING SCHEDULE IS  MANAGED BY DIRECTOR FUJISAWA AN  POLICE CONDUCT REVIEW. I ALSO KNOW THAT DECTOR  FUJISAWA REFERENCED THE FACT  THAT THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS  THAT WE ARE PUTTING IN PLACE FOR THIS BODY GIVEN ITS HIGH PROFILE STANCE AND THE INSTITUTE OF  ISSUES THAT IT DEALS WITH,  COMMISSIONER GURIAN-SHERMAN  STATED THIS BOARD IS UNLIKE ANY  OTHER BOARD THAT WE HAVE. THE DIRECTOR HAS SUBMITTED THAT  POLICY TO ELEFA FOR REVIEW. JUST SO YOU KNOW THAT ALSO HAS  TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED. >> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER, WE'RE ALLOWING TEN SECONDS TO SAY WE ENCOURAGE ALL  COMMUNITY TO APPLY TO THE OPEN  POSITIONS. THANK YOU. I'LL ASK THE CLERK TO RECEIVE  AND FILE THAT REPORT. THE NEXT ITEM WE HAD UP WAS FOR  THE POLICE CHIEF'S APPOINTMENT  EVALUATION. >> MADAM CHAIR. >> YES? >> ON THIS ONE, I DON'T MEAN TO  CUT YOU SHORT, BUT I KNOW WE'RE  RUNNING OUT OF TIME. I HAD A CHANCE TO SPEAK TO  COMMISSIONER BARNETT ABOUT THIS  AND I KNOW YOU HAD A  CONVERSATION WITH HIM AND HE  COMMITTED TO YOU THAT HE WOULD  BE HERE TONIGHT TO DISCUSS THIS  ISSUE. I'M SORRY TO HAVE TO REPORT ON  HIS BEHALF THERE HAVE BEEN SOME  THINGS THAT HAVE COME UP JUST IN THE LAST 48 HOURS AND THAT THAT  WAS NOT POSSIBLE FOR HIM TO BE  HERE TONIGHT AND I KNOW  FACILITATED SOME DISCUSSION  BETWEEN THE TWO OF YOU AND THAT  YOU INDICAT YOU WOULD BE  WILLING TO ACCEPT MOVING THIS  ISSUE TO THE NEXT MONTHLY  MEETING IN MARCH. I THINK THAT'S MARCH 3RD JUST SO WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME CALENDAR. BUT THAT IT WOULD BE ON THE  AGENDA IN MARCH AND HE  UNDERSTOOD THA AND WILL BE HERE IN MARCH AND ASKED ME TO CONVEY  ON HIS BEHALF HIS REGRETS FOR  NOT BEING ABLE TOE HERE  TONIGHT. >> YES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'LL HAVE THAT AGENDA ITEM  FOR THE POLICE CHIEF'S  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION  DISCUSSION FOR CCPO ON MARCH 3RD AT 6:00 P.M. IN THIS CHAMBER. WITH THAT -- COMMISSIONER  GURIAN-SHERMAN. >> I'M SORRY, CAN I ASK ONE  QUESTION. I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT YOU  LETTING US KNOW OR LET ME KNOW  THAT. I HAD ASKED FOR THE ANDA ITEM  ABOUT THE ORDINANCE. WILL THAT BE SOMETHING, DOES THE CITY CLERK OR ANYBODY ELSE KNOW  WILL THAT PRESENTATION ON  REVISIONS TO THE CCPO ORDINANCE  BE DONE IN MARCH OR IS IT GOING  TO BE DELAYED BECAUSE OF THE  FEDERAL CONSENT DECREE? >> MADAM CHAIR, TO COMMIIONER  GURIAN-SHERMAN'S SPECIFIC POINT, I AM NOT SURE WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY ATTORNEY AND COUNCIL  PRESIDENT PAYNE ARE READY TO  PRESENT THAT. I DO KNOW THAT IT IS TOPMOST OF  THEIR MIND AS THEY THINK N  ONLY ABOUT THE CITY PROGRESSING  THROUGH A POTENTIAL CONSENT  DECREE AND GETTING THAT DONE  WHICH IS TOP PRIORITY THAT THE  CHANGES IN ORDINANCE WHICH  ADDRESS MANY, AS YOU'RE WELL  AWARE, MANY PARTS OF THAT  ORDINANCE ARE BEING PRIORITIZED  WHETHER WE CAN BRING FORWARD  CHANGES SORT OF PIECEMEAL TO GET IT DONE FASTER OR WHETHER WE DO  A HOLISTIC CHANGE. AND I KNOW THAT THOSE  CONVERSATIONS ARE HAPPENG  BETWEEN THE CITY ATTORNEY AND  COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAYNE. I DON'T KNOW AND CAN'T SPEAK TO  WHETHER OR NOT THAT WILL BE  READY IN LESS THAN A MONTH WHICH WILL BE FOR THE MARCH 3RD  MEETING. >> THANK YOU. >> WITH THAT, WE'VE COMPLETED  ALL ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA FOR THIS EVENING. WITHOUT ANY OBJECTION, THE  COMMISSION STANDS ADJOURNED. HAVE A GOOD EVENING EVERYONE.