##VIDEO ID:Vq1z2bPui5M## I WILL GO SEE THEM AND EDUCATE  THEM ON A SOLID WASTE  GUIDELINES MORE LESS MORE  FOCUSED RECYCLE PART OF AFTER  THAT I WILL DRIVE AROUND THE  CITY AND I ACTUALLY EXPECT  CYCLE CONTAINERS MANUALLY. FOR  CONTAMINATION.  ♪ AND THEN I WILL TAKE CALLS  FROM DRIVERS IF THERE'S  ♪ ANY ISSUES WITHOUT REPEAT.  GARBAGE RECYCLE AND I WILL GO  EDUCATE THE WHAT I LOVE MOST  ABOUT THE CITY OF NORTH PORT  IS THERE ARE FROM ALL OVER THE  WORLD.  ♪ I GET TO LEARN ABOUT THE SOLID  WASTE GUIDELINES WHEN THEY  COME FROM AS WELL AS EDUCATE  THEM  ♪ ON THE CITY NORTH PORT'S  ALWAYS GUIDELINES HOW TO  RECYCLE PROPERLY.  >> BELIEVE THAT THE NATURAL  RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WILL BE  INTEGRAL PART FOR THE CITY'S  GROWTH IS WE WANT TO ACHIEVE A  MORE BALANCED APPROACH OF  DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE WHAT  WE REALLY WANT TO DO IS SEE  SENSIBLE DEVELOPMENT  SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.  >> AND ABOUT A MONTH THAT IN  LYON WAIVES WHAT WE DO HAVE  ALREADY HAVE HASTENED WE WANT  TO PRESERVE AS MUCH AS WE CAN  OF NATURAL RESOURCES, SO THAT  IS STILL PLACE FULL ON THE OF  ZAW ALL MIKE WRITING BAD  SADDLED THE OF THE SPECIES  THAT AND SURVIVED IT ALL  HABITAT THAT ROLE SYSTEMS. BIG  PART OF.  >> THE WAYS YOU CALL SYSTEMS  FUNCTION AND IMPORTANT PARTS  FOR OUR COMMUNITY, OUR LIST  THE SPECIES THEY STABILIZE THE  SOIL THEY PROVIDE. SO MANY  DIFFERENT BENEFITS, INCLUDING  SHADE LIMITING THE HEAT ISLAND  EFFECTS WITHIN OUR CITY  ♪ PROVIDING HABITAT PROVIDING  SHELTER FOR THE SPECIES. JUST  TO ALSO FOR OUR IS THAT HE CAN  JOIN MINCE WELL AS AN A LOT OF  WHAT I DO IS.  >> MAKING SURE THAT  DEVELOPMENT CONFORMS TO THE  TREE PROTECTION CODE SO ONE  THING WE ALREADY HAVE IN PLACE  SINCE APRIL OF 2022. IS A TREE  PROTECTION CODE WHICH IS QUITE  ROBUST AND THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT THAT WAS ADOPTED BY  COMMISSION AND THE CITY ALSO A  LOT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT  AND SO WE'RE VERY HAPPY TO  HAVE THE TREE PROTECTION CODE  SO.  >> WHAT I DO A LOT OF WHAT I  DO IS MAKING SURE THAT  DEVELOPMENT IN THE RESIDENTIAL  OR COMMERCIAL CONFORMS TO THAT  CODE WE OFF SUCH A PASSIONATE  TEAM WE COME FROM.  >> FACT I THINK BETWEEN US WE  HAVE A 100 DAYS OF EXPERIENCE  WE ARE EVERY RIGHT WING TO GO  OUT AND YOU KNOW WE KNOW WHAT  HE'S CUT OUT. WITH A  ♪ HAPPY TO TAKE THE CHALLENGE TO  DIVISION COMMUNITY  INVOLVEMENT.  >> AND LEADERSHIP IN THE CITY  WE REALLY HAVE TO MAKE GREAT  STRIDES AND PROTECTING WHAT WE  HAVE HERE AND FINDING THAT  BALANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT AND  ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, I'M  EXCITED TO BE A PART OF THIS  TEAM REALLY.  >> SEEKING AND LOOKING FORWARD  TO THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR US TO  BE ABLE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.  ♪ >> REX HAS A FULL CLASS TRX  CAMP IS A NEW CLASS FOR ME,  ALTHOUGH I'VE BEEN USING TRX  FOR MANY YEARS WITH PERSONAL  TRAINING THAT I DO OR IN OTHER  STYLES CLASSES THAT I'VE DONE.  BUT AN ACTUAL FOCUS WITH JUST  TRX THIS IS A NEW CLASSROOM. I  LOVE THE CAMARADERIE TO SAY  WITH ALL  ♪ THE PARTICIPANTS. I THINK WE  HAVE A LOT OF FUN. FIRST OF  ALL EVERYONE GETS TO THE MANS  THAT YEAR EXPENSE OF BEING  THAT WE HAVE 5 STATIONS SO WE  HAVE OVERFLOW OR MORE THAN 5  PEOPLE. PART OF THE PEOPLE ON  THEM AND THE OTHER PEOPLE ARE  DOING FOR WORK AND THEN WE'LL  SWITCH SO EVERYBODY GETS AN  OPPORTUNITY TO BE AN IT IS  TUESDAY 8/6/2024 IT IS.  >> AND WE ARE IN THE CITY  CHAMBERS AND I ALL CITY  COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING TO  ORDER.  >> THIS IS WOULD BEATING THIS  MEETING HAS BEEN PROPERLY  NOTICED AND WILL BE CONDUCTED  AS A HYBRID MEETING. THE QUIET  THE USE OF COMMUNICATIONS  MEDIA TECHNOLOGY CMT A  PHYSICAL FORM VOTING MEMBERS  IS PRESENT AND CITY COMMISSION  CHAMBERS, A HYBRID MEETING  ALLOWED VOTING MEMBERS TO  ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE WITHOUT  PHYSICALLY BEING PRESENT IN  THE ROOM WITH THIS WARM AS CAN  BE. WELL VICE MAYOR STOKES  MYSELF MAYOR WHITE  COMMISSIONER LANGDON AND  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL WILL NOW  HEAR FROM COMMISSIONER IMAGE.  >> GOOD EVENING. HAS  AUTHORIZED BY CITY COMMISSION  POLICY NUMBER 2021. KEN I'M  ATTENDING THE HYBRID MEETING  VIA COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA  TECHNOLOGY BECAUSE I'M  EXPERIENCING A MEDICAL  CONDITION. THANK YOU.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU, I'M  LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO  APPROVE THE USE OF CMT FOR  THIS HYBRID MOVED SECOND. I  HAD A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON TO  APPROVE THE USE OF CMT FOR  THIS HYBRID MEETING AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY. ICE MAY OR WE  WILL HAVE A VOICE.  >> I  >> SPARE PLACEMENTS YES, THEY  ARE THE S LANGDON SAY YES  ALAMO.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> YES.  >> ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 4  TO ALSO PRESENT WE HAVE CITY  MANAGER FLETCHER CITY ATTORNEY  SLAYTON WE HAVE CITY CLERK  ASKED SPECIALIST OVER. THE  FIRE WE HAVE CHIEF HURLEY  CORRECT ALL RIGHT AND FOR  POLICE IS THAT COMMANDER  WILLIAM I HAVE THAT YEAH.  OKAY, SORRY CAPTAIN MARVEL  OKAY AT.  >> I THANK YOU FOR CORRECTING  ME ON THAT AND FOR LATEST ON  THAT. WHAT DO ALL AND SHERRY  TO  >> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  AND TO STANDS ONE NATION UNDER  GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY  JUSTICE FOR ALL.  >> ALL RIGHT. THANK I'M  LOOKING FOR AND APPROVAL OF  THE AGENDA.  >> MOVES.  >> I HAVE FULL APPROVAL OF THE  AGENDA MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL SECONDED  BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON IF  THERE'S NOTHING ELSE WE WILL  DO A VOICE VO ICE EXPERIENCE.  MAYOR YES, LANGDON MISTER I  MEAN ALL RIGHT SO THAT AFTER I  WE ARE ON OUR WAY. WE'RE GOING  GO TO ITEM 2 WHICH IS PUBLIC  COMMENT. I JUST WANTED TO  REMIND PEOPLE ABOUT OUR RULES  OF DECORUM  >> WE LOVE TO HEAR PEOPLE  MAKING THEIR COMMENTS I KNOW.  >> I DO AND I HAVE IN THE PAST  AND IF YOU AGREE WITH SOMEBODY  A THUMBS UP IF YOU DON'T SOME  STOUT BECAUSE WE CAN SEE THAT  FROM HERE AND THAT ALSO  PREVENTS PEOPLE BEING  INTIMIDATED IF THEY HAVE AN  OPPOSING VIEW OF YOURS. TO BE  ABLE TO COME UP HERE FREELY  SPEAK THEIR MIND AS WELL.  >> AND THAT YOU HAVE 3 MINUTES  AND IF YOU WANTED TO MAKE A  PUBLIC CAR COMMENT IS SURE YOU  BUILD OUT A CARD AND IT'S IT'S  UP HERE. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT AS WE DO ALL RIGHT.  >> PAM TOPE CALLING REGARDING  AGENDA. ONE I DON'T TAX 3 SAID  I'M  >> AND THE MEETING THEY 6. I  COMMENT AND. EXAMPLE THAT I  THE CITY THE WEBSITE REGARDING  THE REFERENDUM. UNDERNEATH FAQ  SECTION THAT HE'S LIKE GROW A  FRONT ROW LIVE ON DEVELOPERS  TO TAKE THE INFRASTRUCTURE  PROBLEM. THEY CAN ONLY PAY  WITH DEVELOPMENT. SPECIFICALLY  IMPACTS TO THEIR CONSTRUCTION  PROJECTS A LOT EXPENSES ALONG  PROJECTS WILL BENEFIT CITIZENS  MANY FUTURE. BUT THEY HAVE THE  ABILITY ABILITY TO INCUR BUT  THE CAUSE OF THE IMPROVEMENT  ACROSS THE PRESIDENT ARE  REQUIRED ENTIRE PROJECT  RESULTING IN HIGHER I DID  QUESTION. A FEW MONTHS GOING  FORWARD WITH ACTIVITIES THAT  ARE 6.10 HOW THE  INFRASTRUCTURE AND WOULD BE  PAID FOR AND SHE DID ASSURE ME  THAT STRUCTURE IN AREAS WON'T  BE COVERED BUT THE IMPACT FOR  THOSE AREAS. WE COULD GET TO  AREA WHERE IT'S KIND  DEVELOPMENT. MAYBE WE'RE NOT  ABLE PAY ONLY COST TO EXTEND  THE INFRASTRUCTURE. OKAY,  MEANTIME THE WEB SITE THAT  WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO BORROW  MONEY TO IMPROVE OUR  INFRASTRUCTURE. AND THIS  RADIATING WE WOULD HAVE THE  DEVELOPERS PAY FOR THE AREAS.  AND THAT WORKS FOR THE AREA,  WHAT ABOUT THE RESIDENTS IN  THIS SMALL THAT'S WHEN THE  WATER AND SEWER. NOT THE ONE  TO THE PROPERTY FOR A WHILE  THEY WILL COME, BUT KNOW WHAT  A WEEK FOR THE CITY TO BORROW  MONEY TO IMPROVE THE  INFRASTRUCTURE TO AREA. NO WE  WERE LIKE WHAT PRIORITY CITY  PUTS THE PROJECT CAME TO THE  NOT BE ABLE TO SELL AND  DEVELOP PROPERTY THAT THEY  WANT. THE MIGHT GO THROUGH  KNOWING  HE WOULD THE RED THOSE SMALLER  NEIGHBORHOOD, COUNTER IT. I  NEED CHANGE  >> TO HOW TO BY TO MEETING  DATED 2024.  >> 2020 FORECAST, 1320 24 DASH  15.  >> EVERYTHING COMMISSION  MEETING IN PERSON AND A LOT  PLEADING WITH THE  COMMISSIONERS TO DO THE RIGHT  THING FOR COMMUNITY. WORKING I  WANTED TO MAKE UP. CITY  COMMISSIONERS, THE PAINTING BY  PLANNING IMPLEMENT CHANGE IT  WHICH OBVIOUSLY TO DETRIMENT  OF THE REST CARE AFTER  CONSIDERATION, IT CAME ME  AT THINK THAT THAT AND MAYBE  THE COMMISSIONERS MAY NEED  COMFORT EACH AND SURE YOU'VE  THE FINE AND AND COURSE ANY  OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF ITS  HEART IT WOULD APPRECIATE A  PARTY WITH CAKE BALLOONS I  THINK MAKING UNETHICAL  POSSIBLY ILLEGAL DETENTION. WE  HAVE CONSTITUENTS IS FOR  INDIVIDUAL WHO WORK FOR THE  THE PEOPLE SHE WAS GOING THE  PEOPLE THAT TO DO THE RIGHT  THING FOR  >> HE TO JUST TRANSFERRING  TREAT THIS CAUGHT FIRST I 2024  OUT. I THE AGENDA I WANT  MISSION I BACK QUESTION IS  WHETHER. THEY WILL SAID HE  WOULD GOING TO PRESERVE THE  GET WHAT PAY. HAVE TO DO JUST  HAVE A HAVE A PARTIAL TO  APPROVE A NEW DO POINT 3 POINT  OUT. THING. DR. PUBLIC  COMMISSIONER'S REPORT POSES  IMMINENT YOU ALWAYS FEEL NOW.  THE COMMISSION A CONCERN. AND  PUBLIC DISCUSSION  >> RATE A BARREL. IT I THINK  UNDERSTANDING COMMISSION WILL  RELINQUISH ELECTED OFFICIAL  OVERSIGHT PUT RELATED TO TO TO  WANT A PARTY IN THE HELP  STRUCTURE VARYING DECISIONS  SHOULD SHOWING YOU THINK THAT  IT BUT READ IT AND HAVING OUR  COMMUNITY CAN  2 OF ACTUAL IN THE NATION AND  I THE PART PAINTING WHICH WE  HAVE TO BUILDING EXPERTISE HIS  TOUR AREA ABOUT A RATION  PERCENT. AND BEING DEMOLISHED.  WHAT HAPPENED TO WANT TO IF  ARE LOT DECISION-MAKING WITH  NO A COMMISSION OR AND YOU CAN  TAKE AND THE RESPONSIBILITY  ELECTED OFFICIAL  I DON'T THINK YOU TO HAVE IT'S  A REALLY  IT IN  OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. THIS  THE  >> 8 OF THEM MAKING AGENDA  ITEMS ORDER NUMBER 2020  FORECAST ON TRAIN AND 24 DASH  ONE. CHANGING THE DEFINITION  OF STUDY SECTION DAY.  I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE  RESIDENTS TRY PUBLIC TO BE  TAKEN AWAY CITY COMMISSIONER  PLAY IN DECISION. A CHANCE FOR  MAJOR AND ALL THE THANK VERY  MUCH.  >> COST FROM OR TAX. MEETING  EVENING WHICH TO STAY THAT  2024.  2024 13 AND WATER NUMBER 2020  BOARD I LIKE TO CALL DO NOT  CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF  PLAN AND I WOULD LIKE TO SAY  DO NOT ALLOW YOU ABOUT OF  MONEY TO BE USED TO JUSTIFY  GOLF COURSE PLAN BUILD THE  FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. AND  SHOULDN'T OUT I HOPE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT  ESTABLISH NEW DENSITY  INTENSITY AND LAND USES AND  ARE 8 PRETTY IT AND THAT'S  HAVE THANK YOU.  >> THE MEETING DATE IS AUGUST  TIMES 6 THE COMMISSION MEETING  FOR TONIGHT AGENDA ITEMS 2024  TO 1320 24 18. I DON'T CHARGE  YOU NEED A COMMISSION TO VOTE  NO OR TO CONTINUE ON 2024 TO  1320 2415 FOR THE FOLLOWING  REASONS ON MAY 28 THAT WAS A  COMMISSION WHICH I INTENDED BE  THE STAFF DID NOT PROVIDE THE  COMMISSION WITH THE COMMISSION  TO PLAN QUESTIONING HE SAID  REGARD TO 2024. DESCHANEL NOT.  DO WE DO ADDITIONAL ITEMS OF  THE SECTARIAN CREEK AND NORTH  PORT DEVELOPMENT CONCERN IS  HOW THESE TORTOISES  TWENTY-TWENTY OR 1320 2417  DEVELOPMENT PARCEL K. COULD  YOU PLEASE GET ANSWERS TO THE  FOLLOWING 2 QUESTIONS SO WE  THE PUBLIC TOTAL OF 2024 OUT  THERE DEVELOP DEVELOP LOCATED  PASSAGE THINK ANY APPEAL TO  THAT YOU MAKE DECISION  REGARDING PARCEL PAYING OFF.  ♪ ♪ ONE COMMISSIONER STATE CARL  PEI FINAL AND THERE'S NOT MUCH  TO TO THE END MY FIRST  QUESTION IS BECAUSE THE  CONTINUES TO PROVIDE  INFORMATION OF THE STUFF ARE  THERE WERE SOMETHING NOBODY  WANTS TO TALK WHEN YOU FINALLY  GET UNDERSTAND THE ANSWERS TO  THE QUESTIONS BECAUSE I'M SURE  OF SEEMS ACTIONS OF A 28.  COMMUNICATION WITH THE JUNE 18  PART OF THE THAT WAS AN  ADMINISTRATIVE A QUESTION.  AND THAT COMMISSION MEETING  GETTING IN THE WON'T BUT THE  ANSWER IS THEY LOCATED CAN BE  DEVELOPED 39 PER ACRE BY  ORDINANCE AND IT ABOUT THE  COVER NEEDED TO MAKE THE WHOLE  SITUATION GO AWAY. THE  DEVELOPER USE ALL OF A BRIDGE  IN DETERMINING I DON'T YOUR  PORES BETTER THAN PROVIDE  TRANSPARENCY HOLD PEOPLE  ACCOUNTABLE. THE COMMISSION'S  MISTER YOU NEED TO MAKE  CHANGES IN THE PROCESS THAT  ALLOWED TRANSPARENCY AND FOR  THE RESIDENTS TO BELIEVE IN  NEED FOR THE DEVELOPER TOLD  PEOPLE THAT.  >> THINK THAT LITTLE BIT  >> POINT. AND  9, 8, 8, ALL ABOUT AT 06:00PM  AT A BRIEF PREVIOUSLY  COMMERCIAL LED AN END HIGH OR  LOW INTENSITY.  >> THAT IT CAN INTENSITY.  YOU'RE CHANGING COUNTY IN  OR AND YOU WANT CALL YOU'RE  TRYING ALLOW TALLER BUILDING  AND A LOT OF COMMERCIAL  PROPERTY. I'M HAPPY PROPERTY  >> CARRY A LOT SHOULD NOT A  COMMERCIAL, BUT YOU REALLY  DON'T WANT TO BE COMMERCIAL.  I'M SURE THE CITIZENS OF PORT.  ONLY DONATIONS ARE GOING GOING  TOO THAT WOULD ALL BE HERE  THEY WOULD ALL BE UP IN ARMS,  YOU'RE DOING THAT MIND. I  THINK YOUR JOB REALLY GET  INJURED UP TO BE WORKING FOR  AND THINK REALLY CHANGING  COLORS BEHIND PEOPLE AND FOR  LIVING AND OVER  AND DON'T A THAT HAVE TO PICK  I KNOW ANYWAY. THANKFULLY  BEFORE YOU GO ON  >> AND CONSIDER THE PEOPLE IN  REPORT BEFORE MAKE ANY  >> TORY HUTCHINSON GOOD  EVENING COMMISSIONERS, I'M  WRITING TO OPPOSE THE PROPOSED  REZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL TO  COMMERCIAL AS PRESENTED. I  UNDERSTAND POTENTIAL NEED TO  DIVERSIFY THE CITY'S TAX BASE  HOWEVER WE'RE SEEING THE  CONSEQUENCES FOR DEVELOPMENT  OR DEVELOPMENT THE LAW  FLOODING ALONG WITH OTHER  IMPACTS OF NATURAL DISASTERS  WILL ONLY GET WORSE AS WE  BUILD MORE AND MORE HAVING  LARGE COMMERCIAL VENTURES  LOCATED NEAR AND WERE WITHIN  RESIDENTIAL AREAS WILL THOSE  PROPERTIES PROBLEMS FOR THEM  OR THERE'S LIKELY TO BE  SIGNIFICANT COST TO IMPROVE  THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THESE  AREAS TO BE ABLE TO ACCEPT  COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND THE  TRAFFIC THAT COMES ALONG AREAS  IN THE PROPOSED REZONING MAPS  THAT ARE ALREADY SENSITIVE TO  FLOODING AND DO THAT LACK  INFRASTRUCTURE, SIGNIFICANT  COSTS WILL BE INCURRED TO  MITIGATE DISASTER RISKS AND  IMPROVE INFRASTRUCTURE WHICH  WILL MOSTLY BE PAID FOR BY THE  TAXPAYERS. DEVELOPMENT HAS A  RIPPLE EFFECT AS NEIGHBORHOOD  SURROUNDING NEW COMMERCIAL  DEVELOPMENT WILL ALSO BE  AFFECTED. POSSIBLY NEEDING  COSTLY MITIGATION AND  INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS,  NORTH PORT IS A GREAT CITY,  BUT IT HAS ITS LIMITATIONS  LIKE ALL CITIES DO. THE MORE  WE CONTINUE TO BATTLE AGAINST  WHAT NORTH PORT WAS MEANT TO  BE THE MORE WILL END UP PAYING  IN THE LONG RUN NATURE ALWAYS  WINS. PERSON, DAVID FOLLOWED  BY SPROUTS AND THE CENTER AND  W BLACKWELL.  >> DAVID AVENUE PORT.  >> FIRST I WANT TO SAY WAS  THANK YOU COMMISSIONER MC YOU  KNOW START SO LAST TERM OVER  THE YEARS CERTAINLY THERE'S  PLENTY THINGS I DON'T AGREE  WITH THEIR OWN. BUT I NEVER  HAD DOUBT THAT SHE HAD.  TAXPAYERS IN MIND WITH  EVERYTHING SHE DID. AND SHE  ASKED QUESTIONS THAT REFLECTED  WHAT. WORKING CLASS CITIZENS  OF THIS TIME WE WANT TO KNOW  SEE COMMISSION  JUST DO. AND I WANT TO THANK  HER FOR HER SERVICE AND  UNDERSTANDING WHAT IT MEANS TO  ELECTED REPRESENTING BECAUSE  THAT'S WHAT LIKE TO REFERENCE  REPRESENTATIVE DOES. THEY  DON'T COME THERE AND SAY WELL  THE STAFF OF EXPERTS AND WE  JUST SIGN OFF ON THAT. THAT IS  NOT WHAT YOUR JOB IS THE CITY  CHARTER WAYS OUT THERE THAT  YOU GUYS THE ONLY LEGISLATIVE  POWER IN THE CITY WHICH MEANS  YOU NEED TO BE THE CHAT. ON  THE GOVERNMENT ON THE FOR THE  PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO JUST  PUT ALL THIS STUFF FOR YOU  GUYS TO SAY WELL, I KNOW BEST  AND NOT THINK ABOUT THE  CITIZENS MEANS OUR SYSTEM IS  COMPLETELY BROKEN. IF YOU GUYS  DON'T DO YOUR JOB. WE DON'T  HAVE A FUNCTIONING GOVERNMENT  AND CHANGES TO THE FUTURE USE  LAND MAP WHICH ARE PART OF A  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ARE SO  IMPORTANT. BUT THE STATE HAS  STATUTES THAT YOU HAVE TO  FOLLOW WHEN YOU DO THIS I  BELIEVE YOU GUYS HAVE VIOLATED  THOSE STATUTES BUT HAD NO  MEANINGFUL INPUT FROM THE  CITIZENS ON THESE DRASTIC  REZONING PLANS IN THE CITY,  YOUR RADICALLY CHANGING THE  CITY, EVERYBODY 1520 YEARS AGO  THAT PRICE BOULEVARD GET WHY  BECAUSE THE CITY WON EVERYBODY  KNEW THAT PINE TREES ON TOLEDO  BLADE GET PLOWED NOW,  EVERYBODY KNEW THAT SOMETHING  WOULD GET DEVELOPED EVERYBODY  KNEW THAT THERE HAD SOLD A  BILL COMMERCIAL ZONE  PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE  NEIGHBORHOODS BUT NOBODY SO  THAT YOU GUYS WOULD SAY LET'S  QUADRUPLE OR 10 TIMES THE  AMOUNT OF THESE PROBLEM  PROPERTIES THAT ARE ZONED  COMMERCIAL IN NEIGHBORHOODS  AND DRASTICALLY INCREASE THE  INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT THAT  YOU CAN PUT JUST COMPLETELY  WRONG PEOPLE MOVE TO THESE  NEIGHBORHOODS ANY REASONABLE  PERSON THAT MOVED INTO THESE  NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE OFF  COLLECTOR ROADS WITH THINK  THIS IS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.  THERE IS NO YOU WOULD THINK  THAT APARTMENT COMPLEX WILL BE  BUILT DIRECTLY IN YOUR  NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS CRIMINAL  WHAT YOU'RE DOING TO THE TO  THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THIS  TIME. WHAT'S REALLY SAD AND  DISAPPOINTING ABOUT ALL THIS  MASTERCLASS UNDEMOCRATIC  GOVERNMENT THAT YOU GUYS ARE  PUTTING ON IS THAT YOU KNOW I  TRY GET PEOPLE TO COME OUT AND  SPEAK. REALLY BOTHERS ME IS  THEY ALL SAY TO ME WHY IT  DOESN'T MATTER. AND. THAT'S  THAT'S WHAT YOU WITH THAT. AND  MEAN FOR PROBLEMS DISSENTED  IT.  >> I'M JUST GOING LEAD INTO  SOMETHING UP SEVERAL TIMES  TONIGHT. BUT WHAT I DO WANT TO  SAY IS THAT WE COME BEFORE YOU  AND I'M GOING BACK UPDATED A  LOT OF THINGS HE SAID WE COME  BEFORE YOU BECOME BEFORE YOU  HEAR FROM THE PEOPLE HEAR FROM  US.  AND WHAT LIKE WERE IGNORED.  >> AND HE IS WHY WE CAN'T GET  PEOPLE TO SHOW UP ANYMORE  BECAUSE THEY SAY WHAT THE HECK  THEY LISTEN TO US ANYWAY. THEY  DON'T CARE THEY JUST MAKE UP  THEIR OWN MINDS. THEY HAVE  THEIR OWN AGENDAS AND THIS IS  WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO. AND  THIS THE PROBABLY GOING TO  HAVE WITH THE REFERENDUM AND  JUST BASICALLY EVERYTHING THAT  YOU REALLY WANT TO TRY AND GET  BY THE PEOPLE BECAUSE THE  OPPOSITION BECAUSE WE FEEL NOT  LISTEN TO WE COME BEFORE YOU  AND WE HAVE EXPERTISE IN SO  MANY SUBJECT MATTERS THAT  WOULD BE EQUIVALENT TO STEP  AND GO BEYOND THAT, ESPECIALLY  MYSELF WHEN I COME BEFORE YOU  AND I GIVE YOU RECOMMENDATIONS  AND I AND I TELL YOU WHAT  SHOULD BE WHAT SUGGESTING  SHOULD BE DONE AND IT JUST  LIKE THEY WOULD LIMBAUGH. THEY  DON'T KNOW WHERE I HID  NOTHING. I DON'T EVEN SEE THEM  INCORPORATE IT IT'S LIKE I'M  TALKING TO THE WIND AND I'M  STILL COMING UP THE FLOOR YOU  EVERY SINGLE TIME AND I GET  EMOTIONAL BECAUSE I LOVE THIS  CITY SO MUCH AND WHAT YOU'RE  ABOUT TO DO. IT'S JUST KICKING  US IN THE EXCUSE MY LANGUAGE,  BUT HOW MANY TIMES WE HAVE TO  GET BEFORE YOU AND PLEA TO YOU  TO NOT DO CERTAIN THINGS AND  DO NOT INVADE IN CERTAIN  ASPECTS OF NEIGHBORHOODS. IT'S  NOT RIGHT. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY  HOTEL NEXT TO WHERE YOU LIVE  WHAT A MECHANIC SHOP NEXT THE  WAY YOU LIVE. ALL OF NIGHT PUT  NEXT TO IT IT MOVE WE COULD BE  APPEALED TO THE OPPOSITION  TOO. AND WE'RE NOT A VOCAL  MINORITY AND I REALLY A THING  REFERRED TO THAT AS A VOCAL  MINORITY WE ARE CITIZENS WHO  CARE ABOUT THIS CITY. WE HAVE  A VOICE WE USE VOICE WE SHOULD  NOT BE REFERRED TO AS A VOCAL  MINORITY. WITH JUST THE ONES  WHO GET UP HERE AND BEFORE  TIME OF THE TIME AND AGAIN CAN  ACTUALLY SPEAK BEFORE YOU WHO  ARE NOT GIVING UP. HAVE NOT  GIVEN UP. THAT'S IT I CAN GO  ON AND ON ABOUT HOW MY HEART  IS BREAKING FOR WHAT'S GOING  ON.  >> PLAY THE.  GOOD EVENING. I'M  DEBBY BLACKWELL I LIVE IN THE  WARM MINERAL SPRINGS  NEIGHBORHOOD AND THAT CAST  MAYOR LIKE THAT FOR NOW AND  THEY'RE RUNNING. THIS COPY OF  THE CONSTITUTION UNITED STATES  OF AMERICA THAT THE LATE  SENATOR ROBERT BYRD GAVE ME  WHEN I WAS DEN LEADER DEBBIE  UP IN WEST, VIRGINIA.  >> HE KEPT IN HIS POCKET ALL  THE TIME SOMETIMES SENATOR  MADE SOME MISTAKES HE MADE  SOME BIG MISTAKES AND WHEN YOU  MAKE THOSE MISTAKES YOU  REALIZE IT'S A MISTAKE ANY  CHANGED ITS PATH. WE THE  PEOPLE ARE WONDERING.  COMPETITIVE BIDDING IS A  FORMAL PROCESS THAT ALLOWS  BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENT  AGENCIES TO REQUEST THEM  IDENTIFY SERVICES AND  EQUIPMENT AND THEN INVITE  MULTIPLE VENDORS TO BID ON  THEM. IT'S OFTEN USED WHEN A  LARGE SCALE DELIVERY OF  PRODUCTS OR SERVICES IS  REQUIRED. LET'S BUILD A NEW  POLICE HEADQUARTERS  222 MILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS  BRING THE VOTERS THAT WE MUST  HAVE IT AND NO COMPETITIVE  BIDS ARE REQUIRED. LET'S DO  NOTHING. ONE BID IS FINE.  LET'S HEAD THE P 3 FOR WARM  MINERAL SPRINGS, ALL OF A  SUDDEN THE PLAN IS IN PLACE  AND IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.  LET'S DO NOTHING. THE CITIZENS  REQUESTED CERTAIN RECOMMEND  IT'S 2 NOTHING. LET'S IGNORE  THE WARM MINERAL SPRINGS PARK  AND HAVE THE PARKS AND  RECREATION DEPARTMENT DO NOT  THINK DESPITE ALL THAT TALENT  AND EDUCATION AVAILABLE THERE.  IN THAT DEPARTMENT NO TRAILS  NEW SOCCER FIELD OFF. WENT  FENCE. LET'S DO NOTHING FOR  THE ONLY PROPER THE PARK IN  THE CITY. WE NEED TO HAVE  ACCESS TO MILLIONS OF DOLLARS  FOR EMERGENCIES. THERE'S A  POINT SPOT UP. LET'S HAVE A  REFERENDUM THIS YEAR SO WE CAN  GET ACCESS TO MILLIONS OF  TAXPAYER DOLLARS. LET'S DO  NOTHING TO PREVENT  INFRASTRUCTURE FAILURE PROVEN  INCREASE THE SEWER AND WATER  LINES, LET'S DO NOTHING. THE  CITIZENS CAN BE EASILY  BAMBOOZLED AND TO CHANGES IN  THEIR PROPERTY SETTING AND  CITIES IT. WE WILL HAVE THEM  FOCUS ON CARS PARKED IN GRASSY  LAWNS AND WE SEE IT AS WE SEND  NEIGHBORHOODS FOR THE COMFORT  OF DEVELOPERS ADD WHATEVER IS  PROFITABLE. IT'S 2 NOTHING  ABOUT SAVING THE TREE CANOPY  AND THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS AND  SAFE CLIMATE PLANNING FOR THE  VOTERS IN THE YEAR 2065. DID  YOU SEE THE PHOTOS ARE SO WE  FEEL FROM YESTERDAY. THAT'S  FROM OVER PLANT THAT'S OVER  DEVELOPMENT. THINK  >> AND TODAY CARLO ALBAN NOT  AND AND LOW BACK. ANSWER TO  CARLO CUTHBERT AVENUE PORT.  THERE ARE FEW ISSUES I'D LIKE  TO POINT OUT FOR EXAMPLE, THIS  REZONING ISSUE IS A HIGH  INTEREST AS I'M SURE YOU KNEW  IT WOULD BE. SO INSTEAD OF  TAKING THE MINIMAL. EXTRA  EFFORT TO NOTIFY ALL THE  CITIZENS YOU DECIDED TO TAKE  THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE  AND SNEAK IT THROUGH YOU DUG  DEEP TO FIND THE MOST MINIMAL  REQUIREMENTS YOU COULD LEGALLY  GET AWAY WITH TO REZONE  PROPERTY. YOU ALL KNOW FULL  WELL THAT THE PRIVATE VERY  SMALL LOCAL NEWSPAPER THAT YOU  ADVERTISED IN TWICE TO FULFILL  YOUR MINIMUM REQUIREMENT HAS  AN EXTREMELY LOW CIRCULATION.  IT SEEMS PRETTY UNDERHANDED  AND SNAKE. SAME FOR THE  EMERGENCY MONEY ARE  REQUESTING. I PERSONALLY THINK  IT NEEDS TO BE TABLED AND NOT  GROUPED TOGETHER WITH ANOTHER  ORDINANCE. I HOPE TONIGHT IS  THAT EVERYONE IN THIS AUDIENCE  AND EVERYONE IN THE COMMUNITY  REMEMBER THAT MOST OF THESE  COMMISSIONERS, BUT WE ONLY  DESERVED THE MINIMUM COME  ELECTION TIME LET'S SHOW THEM  OUR APPRECIATION.  >> MY NAME IS JUDY YOU I'M A  RESIDENT OF NORTH PORT FEEL  LIKE THIS IS MY LAST  OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK OUT  AGAINST THE REZONE AND IT'S  REALLY SAD THAT THE  EXPECTATION IS THAT YOU GUYS  ARE GOING OR WHAT EVERYONE  SAYS AND JUST PAST ANYWAYS WE  ALL KNOW THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT'S  GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE WE'VE  THROUGH.  >> SO MANY NEEDLES WITH TONS  OF PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> AND YOU JUST DO THE EXACT  OPPOSITE OF WHAT EVERYONE  WANTS. AND IT'S LIKE FOR ME  SAID IT'S LIKE VERY SNEAKY THE  WAY IT'S BEEN DONE. IT DOESN'T  HAVE THE INTERESTS OF THE  PEOPLE IN MIND REZONING OF  RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN  THE WAY THAT YOU'VE DONE IT IS  JUST COMPLETELY WRONG. IT'S  GOING DESTROY OUR CITY AND  IT'S GOING TO BE THE LEGACY  THAT YOU LEAVE BEHIND. AND  IT'S REALLY GOING TO MAKE IT  UNLIVABLE PLACE SO THANK YOU.  >> BEEN CALLED ON YOU. CITY  MANAGER REST OF YOUR A LITTLE  AGAIN OF THE ATTORNEY FOR THE  AIR AND FREE COMMUNITY  ASSOCIATION.  COMMUNITY OF LOVE. 831 HOLES  AND THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE  YOUR CONSTITUENTS. AND I RISE  AT THIS POINT HAVING. PRACTICE  LAND USE OF THE PIER BEFORE  MISSIONS LIKE THIS FOR WELL  OVER 30 YEARS. BUT COUNTLESS  TIMES. I HAVE NEVER SEEN 3  MINUTES ALLOWED. A CITIZEN TO  ADDRESS AMENDMENTS TO THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS  TO LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,  HUNDREDS OF PAGES. YOU CAN'T  DO IT WITHIN THAT CALL IT. YOU  HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY AND AND  THANK YOU FOR NOT MAKING WAIT  8 HOURS TO GET TO IT AS YOU  DID THE LAST 2 TIMES.  HOPEFULLY THIS POINT THOUGH  TOO LONG YOU HAVE AN  OPPORTUNITY TO ENGAGE WITH THE  PUBLIC. GAMES WITH ME ON THEIR  BEHALF, I'M EXPERT AT THESE  KIND OF THINGS I HAVE SPECIFIC  LANGUAGE FOR YOU IF YOU LIKE  ASK YOU PLANS BEING REQUIRED  AFTER THE DRI EXPIRES FORT  SENSE. YOU KNOW ONE 30 THIS  AFTERNOON STAFF RESPONDED TO.  SOME POINT SITES ENTER YOU  INTO THEM. WEST THE PREVIOUS  NIGHT AND I WAS WIDE AGAIN 2  HOURS LATER AND I IF I COULD  ASK TO BE THOSE OF YOU HAVE  NOT IN THE LAST COUPLE OF  HOURS HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT  MY REPLIES. BUT STAFF OTHER  THAN ONE POINT LIGHT AT THE  END WHERE THEY HAD SOME SO  THINGS THAT WERE COMPLETELY  NOT TRUE. THEY'RE PROBABLY  GOING TO BE GIVEN A CHANCE  TONIGHT IF YOU WANT TO HEAR  WHAT THE PUBLIC IS ASKING  ABOUT AT ALL. WHICH HAS BEEN  LARGELY DISREGARDED. AND ALL  THESE HEARINGS TODAY YOU WANT  TO HAVE A DIALOGUE. YOU'RE  PROBABLY LET STAFF HAVE  UNLIMITED TIME TO SAY THINGS  THAT FRANKLY WITH ALL RESPECT  TO STAFF ARE LARGELY UNTRUE.  WE CAN TELL YOU WHY THEY ARE.  BUT I RISE SPECIFICS RIGHT  NOW. YOU KNOW THEY ARE UP  MINUTES LATER ON THE SPEAK TO  THOSE. THAT'S REALLY NEEDED  AND YOU CAN GRANTED IF YOU  WANT TO. BUT TO SUGGEST TO YOU  FROM MY AND FOR THE HEARTS OF  THE PEOPLE IN BUT THE WAY TO  HAVE UNITY IN YOUR COMMUNITY.  WHICH WAS YOUR BIG RIGHT NOW  CITY MANAGER SPEAKS TO  WEBSITES YOU KNOW GET UNITY IN  YOUR COMMUNITY BY SUPPRESSING.  EXPRESSIONS OF CONCERN AND  POLICY. WELL YOUR RESIDENCE.  YOU KNOW I ANALYZED AND ALL  GUYS TO THAT IS WELL IT'S  OBVIOUSLY MUCH MORE HARSH. BUT  SO DAD TOO. YOU KNOW WE'RE NOT  GOING TO PEOPLE SPEAK. WE'RE  NOT GOING TO LET PEOPLE HAVE A  MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY FOR  INPUT, WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE  DIALOGUE WOULD GO TO DIFFERENT  COMPLETELY THE STAFF. MAKES  POLICY CONFERRING BEHIND THE  WITH DEVELOP.  >> IT'S NOT RIGHT. YOU HAVE A  CHANCE TO TURN THE CORNER  TONIGHT WE SEE. AND I HOPE YOU  THANK YOU TAKE A DIFFERENT  PATH. THANKS TO LOW BACK. IS  THAT IT. ALL  >> MOVING ON TO ITEM 3 WHICH  IS THE CONSENT AGENDA CITY  MANAGER HAVE ANY ITEMS BEEN  YES, MADAM MAYOR. WE FOR THAT  ONE THAT'S THE ONLY AND IT OF  THAT. WE'RE JUST GOING TO  DISCUSS THAT CORRECT. JUST  DON'T THINK WE'LL BE VOTING ON  RIGHT. YOU DON'T REALLY HAVE  TO PUT A A POLL  >> WITHOUT OKAY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL TAKE NEW.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU MAYOR  THE REASON WHY HOLD THAT IS  NOT FOR THE ENTIRE CONSENT  AGENDA MINUTES, BUT ONE  SPECIFIC SET OF MINUTES AND  THAT IS THE ONE STATED MAY  14TH 2024. I HAD SUBMITTED TO  THE CITY CLERK. SOME  RECOMMENDED THOSE RECOMMENDED  CHANGES HAD TO DO WITH A VOTE  THAT WAS INACCURATELY RECORDED  IN THESE MINUTES PRESENTED. IT  WAS ACTUALLY ONE YES VOTE 3 NO  VOTES AND ABSENT BOW. THE CITY  CLERK REVIEWED MY  RECOMMENDATION SAID YES WE  NEED TO CORRECT IT BUT FOR  SOME REASON THAT WAS NOT UP  LOADED OR DISCUSSED TO BE  CORRECT. SO THAT'S I DID  ADVISE THE CITY PARK AND THE  CITY MANAGER IS TO THE REASON  WHY WAS PULLING IT. AND HERE  WE ARE TODAY. OK  >> YES THAT IS NOT CHANGE TAKE  SO WE APPROVE THOSE AS AMENDED  YOU CAN APPROVE ALL THE OTHER  ONES AND THEN APPROVED THOSE  AMENDED TO UPDATE THE. THE  MOTION YES, SO IT'S JUST A MAY  14 MAY NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED  FOR THE VOTE FOR THE  DISCUSSION WE HAD REGARDING  THE THINK TANK THE COUNTY AND  THE STATE OFFICIALS.  >> THE MOTION FAILED ON THE  FOLLOWING VOTE OF. YES FOR  MCDOWELL KNOW FOR WHITE STOKES  AND LANGDON AND I'M RICH WAS  ABSENT THAT IS THE CORRECT  VOTE. BUT IT WAS NOT CAPTURED  IN SPOTLIGHT. THEY HAD ME DOWN  AS A NO VOTE TONIGHT WILL YES,  OK. THAT'S LONG SHORT OF IT'S  PLAIN THAT REALLY WELL BECAUSE  YOU KNOW I GOT IT THANK YOU.  >> SO WE COULD APPROVE JULY  11TH MAY 28 APRIL 23RD AND  THIS WILL COME BACK IS THAT  SOME UNDERSTANDING CITY WAKING  UP WITH THOSE WINDS AS  PRESENTED AND THEN APPROVED  THE MAY 14 AS AMENDED.  >> AND WE WILL AMEND THEM.  OKAY AT THE MAKE A MOTION  COMMISSIONER. IF THERE'S NO  FURTHER DISCUSSION FOR MY  FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. COMMENT.  >> MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE  THE MEETING MINUTES DATED JULY  11. MAY 28. APRIL 23RD AS  PRESENTED AND CHANGING THE  MEETING MINUTES FROM A 14. TO  REFLECT THE ACCURACY OF THE  VOTE HAS WITH THE E-MAIL DATED  JUNE 4TH TO THE CITY PARK.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WE HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL TO APPROVE THE  MINUTES OF JULY 11 MAY 28 AND  APRIL 23RD AS PRESENTED AND  THE MINUTES FROM MAY 14.  CHANGING THEM CHANGING THOSE  MINUTES REFLECT THE ACTUAL  ACCURATE CORRECT. AS THAT  SOUNDS COMMISSIONER DO I HAVE  A SECOND DO.  >> ALL SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR.  IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE WILL  DO A VOICE. BOTH VICE MAYOR  VICE MAYOR MAYOR ZS LAND MCS  MICHELLE, YES COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE. YES ALL RIGHT SO THAT  PASSES 5 TO 0. MAY NOT ITEM  FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS. ORDINANCE  SECOND READINGS A 2024 DASH 20  I. THIS IS A QUASI JUDICIAL  HEARING CITY CLERK. AND YOU  THIS BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 25 AND  ORDINANCE OF THE CITY IN NORTH  PORT FLORIDA REZONING  APPROXIMATELY 27.7 8, 1, 6  ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF  SOUTH TAMIAMI TRAIL US 41 EAST  OF SOUTH WEST VILLAGES  PARKWAY.  >> IN SECTION 3233 TOWNSHIP 39  RANGE 20 EAST OF SARASOTA  COUNTY AND FOR THE DESCRIBING  INSTRUMENT NUMBER 201-514-1220  IN OFFICIAL RECORDS IN  SARASOTA COUNTY FROM NOSING  DESIGNATION DISTRICT ANDY DE  ESTE OCCASION TO VILLAGE BE  CLASSIFICATION AMENDING THE  OFFICIAL ZONING MAP PROVIDING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  FILING OF APPROVED DOCUMENTS  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE  CAN EVERYONE WISHING TO  PROVIDE TESTIMONY PLEASE STAND  RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. FAR  FROM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE  ABOUT TO PROVIDE IS TRUE AND  ACCURATE TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE  TO HELP YOU GOT THANK YOU.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU DO WE  HAVE ANY EX PARTE  COMMUNICATIONS VICE MAYOR.  >> NO NOTHING SINCE THE LAST  MEETING WE HAD.  >> OK THE SAME NOTHING SINCE  THE LAST MEETING LIKE LINE  DONE NOTHING SINCE FIRST  READING. COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  ON THE ONLY IS WHAT I  DISCLOSED AT FIRST READING.  COMMISSIONER AND RICH.  >> NOTHING EXTRA ACCEPT FOR  WHAT I DISCLOSED FIRST READ  >> OK THANK CITY CLERK DO WE  HAVE ANY AGGRIEVED KNOW  AGGRIEVED PARTIES FOR US THE  MOUNTAIN. ALRIGHT PRESENTATION  BY APPLICANT.  >> AGAIN FOR THE RECORD  JACKSON TENANTS ARE IN LAW  FIRM ENGINE FOR THE APPLICANT  PROPERTY OWNER SAID THE  MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSERT SOME  COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL  DISTRICT. WE BASICALLY THE  LONG AND SHORT OF IT AT FIRST  READING VERY SIMPLE REZONING  REQUEST. WE'VE MADE THE RECORD  EFFORTS READING AS WELL OPT  INTO THIS READING AND  RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR  APPROVAL, THANK YOU. RIGHT  SHORT AND SWEET.  ♪ ♪ >> PRESENTATION BY STAFF.  >> GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS  FOR THE RECORD SHERRY WILL ACT  ON AND PLAN OR 3 PLANNING AND  ZONING DIVISION. I HAVE BEEN  SWORN. STAFF DOES NOT HAVE A  PRESENTATION THIS EVENING.  EVERYTHING WAS ADDRESSED AT  FIRST READING STAFF IS  RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING  APPROVAL FOR THE REZONING  ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION. THANK  YOU ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.  >> FOR THE APPLICANT ANY  REBUTTAL. NO MA'AM NO REBUTTAL  ALL RIGHT AND FOR THE RECORD  STEPH ANY REBUTTAL. STAFF HAS  REBUTTAL. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT  ANY PUBLIC COMMENT CITY CLERK.  LOOKING FOR ANY COMMISSIONER  QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE YOU HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> MOVING ON TO CLOSING  ARGUMENTS ANYTHING FROM. STAFF  HAS NO CLOSING ARGUMENTS THANK  YOU. THANK APPLICANT ANY  CLOSING ARGUMENTS. ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU. SO I CLOSE PORTION  OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I'M  LOOKING FOR A MAKE ONE MAYOR  GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO APPROVE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2025 24 DASH  25.  >> AND FIND THAT BASED ON THE  COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE  THE REZONING WILL NOT  ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PUBLIC  INTEREST HEALTH SAFETY AND  GENERAL WELFARE AND THAT THE  SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS AND THE  CITY NOT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.  >> AND THE STANDARD LISTED IN  SECTION ONE DASH 33 ANYONE OF  THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT  CODE HAVE BEEN MET.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WE HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON AND SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TO  APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 20 I. WE FIND THAT BASED  ON THE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL  EVIDENCE THE REZONING WILL NOT  ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PUBLIC  INTEREST HELP SAFETY AND  GENERAL WELFARE AND THAT  SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS AND THE  CITY OF NORTH PORT  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE  STANDARDS.  >> THIS IS A DONE SECTION ONE  DASH 33.81 OF THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE HAVE BEEN.  >> MET. WE HAVE A SECOND IS  THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.  A I'M GOING TO CALL FOR THE  VOTE. I AIR BASE YES.  >> THEY ARE ZS LANGDON IS YES  MCDOWELL, YES, COMMISSIONER  EMRICH.  >> YES, ALL RIGHT SO THAT  PASSES HIGH  >> ON TO ITEM B ORDINANCE  NUMBER 20 2024 DASH 26 AGAIN  IS JUDICIAL AND GOING ON THE  BY TITLE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 26 AND ORDINANCE OF THE  FL AMENDING THE VILLAGE  VILLAGE DISTRICT PATTERN PLAN  WEST VILLAGES AK WELLEN PARK.  >> AMENDING THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE, 2 BEST  FRIENDS THEM ENDED VILLAGE  DISTRICT PATTERN PLAN,  PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE  YOU HAVE A MOTION BY PROVIDE  TESTIMONY PLEASE STAND RAISE  YOUR RIGHT HAND. SARAH FROM  THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE  ABOUT TO PROVIDE AS ACCURATE  TO THE BEST YEAR KNOWLEDGE SO  HELP YOU GOD. I DO THINK  HAPPENED.  >> AND AGAIN I'M GONNA CALL  FOR DISCLOSURE OF ANY EX PARTE  COMMUNICATIONS VICE MAYOR OF  THING IS FRUSTRATING. NOTHING  NEW SINCE FIRST READING  LANGDON NOTHING NEW SINCE  FIRST READING.  >> ONLY THEY EX PARTE  COMMUNICATION I DISCLOSED AT  FIRST READING.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  NOTHING NEWSOM'S FIRST READING  RIGHT. THANK YOU. CITY CLERK,  ANY AGGRIEVED PARTIES RIGHT.  SO MOVING ON TO A PRESENTATION  BY APPLICANT.  >> AGAIN FOR THE RECORD  JACKSON ASIAN FOR THE  APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERS  OR SO THE COUNTY PUBLIC  HOSPITAL DISTRICT COMING AS A  SMIDGE WE DO HAVE THE SAME  PROJECT TEAM THAT WAS HERE AT  FIRST READING THAT TO  PIGGYBACK ON THE PRESENTATION  FOR THE REZONING VERY WE COVER  LONG AND THE SHORT OF IT AT  FIRST READING WE DO HAVE FOR  YOU ALL AS PART OF THE FOR  APPROVAL TONIGHT. CHANGES WE  DISCUSSED THE FIRST READING  HAVE BEEN MADE AND HAVE BEEN  INCORPORATED IN A MONTH IN  SPACE HAS BEEN PROVIDED WE'VE  REMOVED THAT PROPOSED  EXCLUSION FROM THE WEST  VILLAGE'S REVIEW COMMITTEE  APPROVAL PROCESS ALSO IM  PLEASED TO SAY AS WE MENTIONED  AT THE FIRST READING BETWEEN  JULY 23RD AND TODAY AUGUST 6  WILL BE WORKING WITH HOME  PARK. WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO  RESOLVE THAT MATTER WITH THEM  AND HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT  WITH AS WELL. SO THANK YOU FOR  PLACING FAITH AND BOTH OF US  TO BE ABLE TO PUT THAT  TOGETHER AND A VERY PLEASE  SHARE THAT WITH YOU WITH THAT  SAID. THIS IS ALL PART OF A  MASTER PLANNING PROCESS AGES  LOOKING FORWARD TO COMPLETING  THAT. EVENTUAL SOME MIDDLE FOR  PERMITS FOR THE SITE AND ALSO  I WOULD BE REMISS THANK STAFF  FOR THE HARD WORK THAT THEY'VE  PUT IN IN THIS APPLICATION  PROCESS AS WELL WITH THAT ALL  SAID WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST  YOUR APPROVAL FOR THE VP AMEND  THAT AND WERE AVAILABLE YOU  HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.  THANK YOU. ALRIGHT  PRESENTATION BY STAFF.  >> GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS  AGAIN SURE WE WILL LET ON  PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION I  HAVE STAFF IS INCORPORATED THE  CHANGES THAT COMMISSION MADE A  LAST MEETING INTO THE DOCUMENT  AND STAFF IS RESPECTFULLY  REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR  ADOPTION, THANK YOU. THANK  YOU.  >> MOVING ON TO BOTTLES  APPLICANT ANY REBUTTALS. NO  ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU STAFF AND  THEY RESETTLE. STAFF HAS TO  REBUTTAL. THANK YOU ALL RIGHT,  THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY  PUBLIC COMMENT TIME ALL RIGHT  MOVING ON TO COMMISSIONER  QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> YES, MAYOR I JUST HAVE 3  SMALL ONES I'M THE FIRST ONE  HAS TO DO WITH PAGE, 13  THERE'S UP DEVELOPMENT  STANDARDS CHURCH. AND WHEN YOU  LOOK AT CHART. THERE'S A  FOOTNOTE TITLE NUMBER 8 PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USES AND CIVIC  SPACES. BUT IN THE ACTUAL  CHURCH THERE IS NO PLACEMENT  OF THAT FOOTNOTE AND I'M  CURIOUS WHERE IS THAT FOOTNOTE  NUMBER 8 SUPPOSED TO  >> SO  >> I GUESS IT AND I I MAY NOT  UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION FIRST  PLEASE BEAR WITH ME ALL OF THE  NOTES UNDERNEATH THEIR ONE  THROUGH 8. ARE STACKED IN  CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER AND  THEY'RE NOT REFERENCE ANY  WHERE SPECIFICALLY ON THE  CHART THAT'S THE FORMAT WAS  APPROVED AND WE JUST HAD NO  MEMORY.  >> OKAY, SO IF YOU LOOK AT FOR  EXAMPLE. NO NUMBER 3 FLOOR  AREA RATIO IN THE CHART. THERE  IS A NUMBER 3 AFTER THE FLOOR  AREA RATIO. WHEN YOU LOOK AT  PERMITTED USES THERE'S A  FOOTNOTE. DESIGNATED 1, 6, 7,  AND THEN THAT DESIGNATION IS  IN THE NOSE RELATING TO 1, 6,  7, SO I SEE A NOTE FOR NUMBER  8, BUT I DO NOT SEE A  PLACEMENT OF NUMBER 8 IN THAT  CHART.  >> UNDERSTOOD I PERSONALLY  WOULD IMAGINE STAFF'S POSITION  TO IS THAT IT DOES NOT NEED TO  BE INCORPORATED IN THAT  MANNER. THERE IS NO CONFUSION  HERE. I WOULD SAY IF YOU LOOK  AT NO NUMBER 7 WORKS AS LAKES  AND PONDS MAY BE USED FOR  IRRIGATION AND OR STORAGE OF  RECLAIMED WATER. THAT'S PUTIN  PERMITTED USES BUT THAT IT'S  NOT NECESSARILY A DOMINANT  USED ON THE SITE IF YOU HAVE A  COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. YOU HAVE  A THE LAKE THAT SHE'S FIRST  WATER. IT'S NOT A I LINCOLN  PAWN THESE PROPERTY AND  COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. SO I  UNDERSTAND I JUST DON'T THINK  THERE'S ANY CONFUSION OR ANY  AIR GENERATED BY NOT HAVING 8  INCORPORATED INTO ANY OF THAT  >> NORMALLY WHEN THERE'S A  CHART. AND THEN THERE'S  FOOTNOTE A FOOTNOTE HAS A  DESIGNATION IN THE CHART IS TO  WEAR THAT FOOTNOTE DISPLACED,  AND THAT'S WHY WAS BRINGING IT  TO YOUR ATTENTION STAFF. DID  YOU WANT TO WEIGH IN ON THAT.  WE'LL HAVE MISSION OR.  >> AND LIKE WHAT'S THE PURPOSE  OF THE FOOTNOTE IF THERE'S NO  PLACEMENT OF  >> SO THE FOOTNOTE IS RELATED  TO THE PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL  USES IN CIVIC SPACES THIS KNOW  WOULD APPLY.  >> TO THAT COLUMN.  >> IT GIVES THE COMMISSION.  >> BY CONSENSUS WE CAN SURELY  ADD THAT THE NEW AFTER.  >> THE CIVIC SPACES THAT  DOESN'T FEEL IT'S NECESSARY  BECAUSE IT DOES CALL IT OUT.  >> NUMBER 8 WHERE IT'S A  PICKLEBALL TOO SO IT IS TO PUT  THE BALL TO PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USES.  >> AND CIVIC SPACES. SO IT IS  CLEAR.  >> I JUST WANTED TO BRING TO  YOUR ATTENTION YOU HAVE NOTES  ONE THROUGH 7 AND THEY ARE  SPECIFICALLY PLACED IN THE  CHART 8 HE'S NOT THAT'S WHY I  WANTED TO BRING A TEAR TO OF  COURSE ON IF YOU ALSO LOOK AT  NUMBER 8 THE NOTE. IT SAYS  THE. MY CLASSES AND SECONDLY  GETTING OLD. IT SAYS USE  PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED  TO HERE TO THIS SECTION. 3.8.  VILLAGE MISCELLANEOUS  PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND 3.9  BILITY DESIGN STANDARDS AND  YOU'LL BE LANDSCAPING PARKING  IN SIGNAGE REGULATIONS.  >> THE COMMISSION. THE  COMMISSION GAVE DIRECTION TOO  WAIVE THE PARKING TO BE  COMPLETED AT THE MOSS STAGE  AND THE WAY I'M READING THIS  IS WE ARE WAIVING THE PARKING  REQUIREMENTS AND THAT'S NOT  WHAT WE DID WE SAID IT HAS TO  BE CALCULATED AT NAS STAGE AND  I HAVE A MOTION IF YOU NEED ME  TO READ DIDN'T ELECT THE THIS.  >> SO THE THE STAFF. STAFF  CONDITION WAS FOR PARKING  ADDED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE  TIME OF NAS. WHICH IS  DIFFERENT THEN EXPECT FLEET  WHICH IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT  YOU'RE SAYING NOW. THE PARKING  STANDARD. IT'S TOO. YOU HAVE  THE STANDARDS THAT ARE DONE  FROM THE ULDC AND OR FROM THE  V P P IF THE VP HAS A STANDARD  THAT STANDARD TRUMP'S THE ULDC  IF DPP DOES NOT IT FALLS TO  THE ULDC SO SOMETIMES THERE  COULD BE A GRAY AREA WHERE THE  PPP HAS. 40% OF WHAT WOULD BE  COVERED IN THE PARKING THEY  PICK OUT THOSE PARTICULAR  ITEMS AND THEN AT THE FALSE  THE ULDC STILL MY  UNDERSTANDING OF STAFF'S  CONDITION IN MY UNDERSTANDING  OF WHAT THE VOTE WAS FIRST  READING IS THAT THE PARKING  STANDARDS AS THEY WERE PUT  TOGETHER MOST OF THE DPP AND  THEN THE ULDC FOR US HERE WE  ARE WAIVING THOSE BUT AT THE  TIME OF NAS WE HAVE TO SUBMIT  DATA TO JUSTIFY.  >> THE PROPOSED PARKING COUNT  ON THE PROPERTY AND I DON'T  DISAGREE WITH THAT, BUT THIS  IS SAYING THAT WERE WAVING THE  PARKING REQUIREMENTS.  >> AND FORGETTING ABOUT THE  REST OF THE REQUIREMENT THAT  IT BE CALCULATED AT AND THEY  YOU KNOW ME AND THAT'S A  CONDITION WITH THE APPROVAL.  SO THAT SURVIVES WITH THIS.  >> THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL,  IT WOULD SURVIVE THAT AND  ALSO. IT'S IT WOULD THEY WOULD  STILL HAVE TO MEET THE PARKING  REQUIREMENTS AS WE DISCUSS IT  STATES THEY WOULD STILL HAVE  TO MEET WHAT THE CODE SAID AND  ALSO BUT IT'S REVIEWED FOR THE  TIME OF DEVELOPMENT IS WHEN WE  WILL REVIEW THOSE PARKING  CALCULATIONS AS WE STATED IN  THIS CONDITION DOES GO. THIS  WAS WHAT COMMISSION HAD  ADOPTED THIS DOES CARRY  THROUGH. BUT IT WOULD BE AT  THE TIME OTHER THAN  >> RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH  WHAT YOU ARE SAYING HOWEVER,  WHAT I READ IN THAT FOOTNOTE  IS SAYING THAT WE ARE WAIVING  PARKING REGULATIONS. IT  DOESN'T MENTION THAT WE ARE  WAVING IT WITH THE CAP YACHT  OF THE MAP AND STAGE.  >> WHEN THIS IS THE PPP. AND  IT SAYS THEY WERE WAVING THE  PARKING REQUIREMENTS. WHICH IS  TRUE WE HOWEVER, WE ADDED A  LITTLE EXTRA OF WE ARE WAIVING  THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND  THAT THEY MUST BE CALCULATED  IT'S CHURCH.  >> COMMISSIONER WITH ALL DUE I  THINK YOU'VE LOST TRACK OF A  FUNDAMENTAL. ASPECT OF  INTERPRETING.  >> STATUTES THIS IS A STATE  STATUTE. CITY CODE LATES  THROUGH THE ORDINANCE YOU  YOU'RE REQUIRED TO FIRST READ.  WHAT COULD OTHERWISE BE  CONFLICTING LANGUAGE TO MAKE  THEM MAKE SENSE TOGETHER. AND  ENGINE IN YOUR CITY ATTORNEY  SHIPPING RED CORRECT THIS IS  WHAT WE LAWYERS ONE LAW  SCHOOL. IF YOU'RE CAPABLE OF  READING THE 2 PROVISIONS  TOGETHER WHERE THEY CAN MAKE  SENSE THEN THAT'S THE  INTERPRETATION THAT CARRIES  THE DAY. SO HERE CLEARLY YOU  CAN READ. BOTH OF THESE BOTH  OF THESE PROVISIONS IN A WAY  THAT MAKES THEM MAKE SENSE.  THERE'S A WAIVER BUT THE DATA  HAS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME  >> SO THE WALL WOULD IS NOT  STATED HERE IS WHAT I'M TRYING  BUT THE LAW BUT THE LAW WOULD  SAY THAT THE WAY YOU INTERPRET  THAT.  >> MAYBE MAYBE WE JUST HAVE TO  AGREE TO DISAGREE ON THAT, BUT  THE LAW I THINK PRETTY CLEARLY  WOULD SAY THAT YOU CAN  INTERPRET IT THAT WAY AND THAT  EXACTLY WHAT WAS DECIDED. I GO  BY WRITTEN WORDS, NOT  INTERPRETATION.  >> THE OTHER THING IS ON PAGE  47. IF YOU LOOK AT THE CHART  3.9. 0.9 I APOLOGIZE IT'S ON  PAGE 47 PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL  USES THAT CIVIC SPACES THE  MINIMUM LAND REQUIRED IS 10%  WITH NO MASKS MOM. SO THE  MINIMUM. LAND REQUIRED. WOULD  BE 48 ACRES BECAUSE THERE'S  4480 ACRES 10% IS 48 ACRES BUT  THIS PARCEL IS ONLY 27 ACRES.  AND I'D LIKE TO KNOW HOW. THAT  IT COULD BE A SIMPLE MATH  THERE. I DON'T I DON'T KNOW  THAT'S WHY I WANTED TO BRING  TO YOUR ATTENTION AND THEN  WHEN YOU ADD UP THE  REQUIREMENT. IT DOES NOT 100%.  >> COMMISSIONER WOULD HAVE  LOOKED THERE ARE A FEW OTHER  PROJECTS THAT ARE OUT THERE  THERE IS A CHARTER SCHOOL  WHICH MEETS THAT DEFINITION OF  INSTITUTIONAL AS WELL AS THE  UTILITY JUST 30. IT WOULD  EXCEED THE MINIMUM OF THE 10%  OF THE ACREAGE. WITH STAFF WAS  DOING THE REVIEW WE HAVE  RESEARCH THAT CALCULATED IT.  SO IT WAS. SO THE 10% WAS  ACTUALLY 306.4 3 ACRES WHICH  IS ON THE FRONT PAGES AS WELL  AS THE DEBT ADDING THE 27.70.  334 POINT TO 100% OF THAT  APPROXIMATELY 33. 33.4 THE  CHARTER SCHOOL IS 12 ACRES.  THERE IS THE TILLIS SITE AND  THEN WITH THE SMH THAT'S  ROUGHLY 40 ACRES.  >> UTILITY SITE DISTRICT  VILLAGE SHOULD FOUND  CALCULATED IT WITH THE CHARTER  SCHOOL ITSELF.  >> IT  >> IT DOES IT SAY THAT 10% AND  WHEN IT'S BUILT OUT. AT THIS  TIME WANTED TO MAKE SURE  BECAUSE I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT  OTHER PROJECTS AND I JUST WANT  MAKE TO THE MATH ISN'T THERE  AND IT WAS. MY UNDERSTANDING  AT FIRST READING THAT THIS IS  THE ONLY PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL  LAND USE IN THIS VILLAGE NOW  I'M HERE SOME YES, THERE'S  THANK YOU. YES, ABSOLUTELY.  >> ALL RIGHT. THANK VICE  MAYOR.  >> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THANK  BOTH PARTIES FOR WORKING  THROUGH THE DESIGN STANDARD I  KNOW IT WAS A CHALLENGE AND  SHOULD THAT WORK YOUR WAY  THROUGH WE DO LOOK FORWARD TO  HOSPITAL. OKAY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON.  >> YES I WON PYLON I NEVER HAD  A DOUBT. I KNOW THAT THE  PARTIES WOULD COME TOGETHER  AND FIGURE IT OUT SO THANK  YOU.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE TO DO  HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENT.  >> NOW BASICALLY IS JUST THE  OUTGOING OF IT I KNEW THAT  THEY CAN GET THAT WORKED OUT  RATHER THAN LEAVE ENDED UP FOR  US TO THE SIDE TO MAKE A  DECISION. I'M GLAD THEY WORKS  SO LOOKING FORWARD THANK YOU  MAYOR.  >> YES, THANK YOU.  >> ALL RIGHT DO WE CLOSING  ARGUMENTS BY. STILL HAS NO  CLOSING ARGUMENTS THANK YOU  COMMISSIONER, THANK YOU WE  HAVE CLOSING ARGUMENTS BY  SHORT AND SWEET AS FAR WE  THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME FIRST  READING NOW SECOND READING  RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR  APPROVAL.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU SO  NOTHING FURTHER I WILL CLOSE  PORTION OF THE.  >> PUBLIC HEARING. AND REQUEST  A MOTION MAKE.  >> VICE MAYOR MOVE TO APPROVE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2, 0, 2, 4  DASH 2, 6, AS PERCENT BACK AT.  >> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY VICE MAYOR STOVES TO  APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DES 26 AS PRESENTED AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY.  >> COMMISSIONER LANGDON. VICE  MAYOR. I AM A YES MAYOR ZS  LANGDON SAY YES SICK DO. YES.  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> I MEAN YES.  >> ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5  TO 0. THANK YOU. YOU YOU NOT I  REALLY THIS GOING TO RIGHT.  >> BY  >> OK MOVING TO ITEM.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  13.  >> CITY CLERK AND YOU READ  THIS BY TITLE ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 DASH 13 AN ORDINANCE OF  THE CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  AMENDING UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT KILLING ALL  CHAPTERS EXCEPT CHEKATT 29  SIGN REGULATIONS CREATING NEW  CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS  CREATING A NEW CHAPTER TO  DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, CREATING A  NEW CHAPTER 3 ZONING CREATING  A NEW CHAPTER FOR SITE  DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CREATING  A NEW CHAPTER 6 NATURAL  RESOURCES, CREATING A APPENDIX  THAT INCLUDES DEFINITIONS AND  TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS  PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL OF  DOCUMENTS PROVIDING FOR  CODIFICATION OF BUYING  EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> I THANK YOU CITY MANAGER  THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK ON THIS ORDINANCE IS  AMENDING THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE KILLING ALL  CHAPTERS EXCEPT NUMBER 29. YES  TONIGHT ON SECOND READING OF  THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED  ORDINANCE NUMBER 4 DASH 13.  THANK YOU.  >> DO WE HAVE A PRESENTATION  OR NOT.  >> THERE ARE PRESENTATIONS FOR  THE SOUTH THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT  WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO  QUESTIONS BY. COMMISSIONERS OR  DISCUSSION COMMENTS AND. WE'LL  START WITH 5 ROUNDS JUST SO WE  CAN GET EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE  TO SAY SOMETHING PERSONAL.  HAVE OTHER GROUND AGAINST A  SARI. COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> YEAH, IF SOMEBODY ELSE  WANTS TO GO FIRST I CAN WAIT  TILL THE END I HAVE QUESTIONS.  >> ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER  QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER AVERAGE  DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TAKEN  AWAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH  MAYOR. SO MY FIRST QUESTION  HAS TO DO WITH WHEN I WENT  BACK TO MAKE SURE WORDING FOR  THAT VACANT. PROPERTY SENSE  WAS ACCURATE. AND MAKE SURE  THAT IT WAS CAPTURED CORRECTLY  AND I APPRECIATE WHAT STAFF  PUT IN THERE, THANK YOU VERY  MUCH FOR THAT HOWEVER THEN  WENT RED REST OF THE THINGS  BECAUSE MY HUSBAND AND I ARE  THINKING ABOUT PUTTING A FENCE  ON HER PROPERTY. AND LEARNED  THAT THERE'S NO PERMIT. AND NO  SURVEY REQUIRED ANYMORE. AND  I'M SHERRI A SENSE TOO.  >> IS THAT A GOOD  >> THE OTHER CONCERN THAT I  HAVE IS WHEN I CONTINUED TO  READ IT. IF YOU LOOK PAGE ONE  19 FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT WANT  TO FOLLOW ALONG. IT SAYS THAT  A FENCE OR WALL MAY BE  CONSTRUCTED PROPERTY WHY. SO I  IMMEDIATELY HAD DEJA TO THE  DOLLAR GENERAL WHEN THEY. WHEN  THE COVID ALLOWED THE FENCE TO  BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY  LINE. AND REALIZE THIS IS A  DISASTER WAITING TO HAPPEN  BECAUSE OF THE INCOMPATIBLE  LAND USES WHAT'S THE POINT  BUFFERING IF THERE'S A FENCE  OR WALL ON A PROPERTY LINE  THAT IS REQUIRED TO HAVE X  AMOUNT OF FEET OF BUFFERING.  THE OTHER PART IS. IF IT'S ON  THE PROPERTY LINE. AND I HAVE  IN MY BACKYARD, I HAVE A  DRAINAGE DITCH. NORMALLY THE  CURRENT CODE HAS A 20 FOOT  EASEMENT 22 SHAPE TO BE ABLE  TO A FENCE UP. IT'S PUT IT ON  THE PROPERTY LINE. NOT ONLY  DOES THAT APPLY TO MY  BACKYARD. BECAUSE THE COLD HAS  NO DIFFERENTIATION ABOUT  BACKYARD FRONT YARD OR SIDE  YARD LOCATION. IT CLEARLY SAYS  PROPERTY. I CAN PUT THE FENCE.  ALL THE WAY SNAPPED UP. TO THE  FRONT YARD OF MY PROPERTY. AND  IT DOESN'T HAVE TO JUST BE A  CHAIN LINK FENCE IT COULD BE A  FENCE MADE OF. WHAT WHAT WHAT  IS THE. MASON OR YOUR OUR IRON  OR METAL OR AND I JUST WANTED  TO MAKE SURE THAT. I HAVE I  HAVE SERIOUS RESERVATIONS  ABOUT ALLOWING A FENCE OR  WALL. THE PROPERTY LINE. I  COULD BASICALLY SQUARE OFF MY  PROPERTY. AND NOBODY WILL BE  ABLE STOP THE WAY THAT THIS  CODE IS WRITTEN. OKAY RIGHT UP  TO WHERE THAT POLLS ARE THAT'S  MY PROPERTY LINE. RIGHT ALL  THE WAY TO THE BACK FOR MY  SURVEY ALLOWS OFFENSE TO GO  ALONG THE DRAINAGE DITCH AND  GOD FORBID THESE INCOMPATIBLE  LAND USES THAT WE. 10 YEARS  AGO. DESPERATELY WITH THE  COMMISSION AND STAFF AT THAT  TIME TO ENSURE THAT THE  INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES HAD  BUFFERING INSTEAD OF LOOKING  AT A WALL. WE SHOULD KNOW THAT  YOU WANT SOMEONE I WAS STOP  THE CLOCK TO  >> MAGIC WE HAVE SOMEBODY  DRESSED THAT AND CLARIFY THAT.  >> ALL RIGHT ON DIRECTOR  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THERE  WERE SEVERAL CONCERNS.  COMMUNICATED I HOPE I DIE AND  ACROSS THE MALL DESPITE A  ABSENT SOME QUESTIONS. THE  CURRENT. REGULATIONS. US NOT  TO ALLOW I SPOKE UP SAYS IN  THE EASEMENTS. CLEARLY PROMISE  OF ALL AND PERMIT THAT THAT  SUMMIT  >> AND ALL COMMUNICATION  REGARDING THE REGULATIONS.  CLEARLY COMMUNICATE TO THE  PROPERTY OWNER THAT ANYTHING  AND THEY PLACE IN THE CITY  EASEMENT IS PLACED AT THEIR  REST. AND THAT THE CITY NEEDS  TO REMOVE THAT IN ORDER ACCESS  THEIR TIME THE CITY MAY DO SO  AND IS NOT REQUIRED TO  REPLACE.  >> AS FAR AS ALLOWING TO THE  PROPERTY LINE. OUR REGULATIONS  STILL ALLOW YOU TO PUT YOUR  PANTS ON YOUR PROPERTY LOT. WE  DO NOT REQUIRE A SURVEY RIGHT  OFFENSE IS PLACED THE ON ONE'S  PROPERTY ON COMES TO CIVIL  MATTER BETWEEN REGARDING THE.  REQUIREMENTS OR COMMENTING  UNDER THE CURRENT REDS AND THE  ELIMINATION. THE CITY STAFF  SPENDS AN INORDINATE AMOUNT  TIME ALSO ALL WE DO NOT VERIFY  THE PLACEMENT OF THE UN SAYS  WITH IN SOMEONE'S PROPERTY  HIGH AGAIN THAT PROPERTY  OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY. THE  CIVIL MATTER WE VERIFIED THAT  THEY COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN  REQUIREMENTS. HI LOCATION. AND  STUFF.  >> THAT IS ALL.  >> AND WE DO UNDER THE CURRENT  PERMANENT. OUR INTENT IS TO  ELIMINATE THAT PERMITTING  REQUIREMENTS SO THAT STAFF CAN  SPEND ON ON MORE SUBSTANTIAL  REVIEW ISSUES RATHER THAN  FENCES. WE HAVE INFORMATION  PLIERS AVAILABLE PEOPLE  CONTACT FOR RACE NOT ALLOWED.  NOW SOMEONE DOES PLAY SOME  THOUGHTS THAT DOES NOT COMPLY.  >> WITH  >> REQUIREMENTS THEY COULD BE  SUBJECT TO CODE ENFORCEMENT.  WE JUST FEEL. TIME IS BETTER  INVESTED AND PROCESSING EYE  LEVEL PERMITS AS OPPOSED TO  FRANCIS AS FAR AS COMPATIBLE  LAND USE IS A SHARE RIGHT IT  IS CHAPTER 4 OF THE DRAFT  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT  INCORPORATES BUFFER  REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN  COMPATIBLE LAND USES. PER  CHAPTER WON THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE WHERE  PROVISIONS IN THE CODE SLEPT  MOST STRINGENT PREVAIL, SO  FENCES IN GENERAL, YES ARE IN  CHAPTER THAT SITS BETWEEN  INCOMPATIBLE USES ARE IN  CHAPTER 4 THE BUFFERING  SECTION WHICH HAS NOT WHICH  REQUIRE THE LANDSCAPE AND BE  PLACED ON THE OUTSIDE FOR WALL  A LEMONADE AND THE ABILITY TO  PLACE YOUR ALL ALRIGHT  COMMERCIAL ADJACENT TO SINGLE  ON THE PARKING LOT. I THINK I  COVERED ALL OF THOSE AND THIS  >> YES GOING.  >> SO IN THE EXISTING CODE  OFFENSE IS NOT ALLOWED MORE  LESS THAN IT DID.  >> IT DEPENDS ON HOW YOU WANT  TO READ IT FENCE LOCATIONS  MORE THAN 20 FEET FROM THE  BODY OF WATER. THAT'S IN THE  EXISTING CODE. AND AND IN THE  CURRENT PROPOSED PO THERE'S  NOTHING STATING THAT THE CITY  CAN REMOVE ANYTHING IN THE  EASEMENT IT'S NOT IN THE CODE.  SO IF YOU TRY TO REMOVE MY  FENCE.  >> NOT IN THE DROPPED CODED  YES UNDER ENCROACH CUTS. THERE  ARE STATEMENTS AND THE AND THE  DRAFT THAT DO INDICATE THAT  ANYTHING PLACED IN THESE  MINUTES, HOW THE PROPERTY ON  CRUST THE WATERFRONT SETBACK  DIFFERENT THAN IT IS MEANT  SETBACK AS IT WERE. ART OR NOT  ALLOWING THAT'S EASEMENT WE'VE  GOT A LOT OF DRAINAGE. WANT  MAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT  ALONG THAT THEY ARE ALL  WATERFRONT PROPERTIES. SO THAT  PEOPLE CAN PLACE THEIR PRIDE  ON THEIR PROPERTY LINE AND THE  REAR. WE'RE FINE AND MORE AND  MORE THAT'S A MULTIFAMILY  PROPERTY OWNERS ARE EXTREMELY  FRUSTRATED BECAUSE SAYING I  WANT. 8520 FOOT. SO ALL OF  THEIR BACKYARD THAT THEY CAN'T  USE. AND THAT'S BECAUSE  THEY'RE A WATERFRONT LAW.  THEY'RE GIVEN LAST RITES TO  FENCING THEY ARE WATERFRONT  NEIGHBORHOODS. THAT'S WHY THE  CODE IS DRAFTED OF THIS.  >> SHE HAD THE CONVERSATION,  THANK YOU I JUST. DON'T HAVE  TO AGREE WITH THAT, BUT THAT'S  A THIS IS AN INCENTIVES. IF  YOU LOOK AT IT. SO PAGE ONE  11. BACK TO THE FENCING AND  WHILE THING DURING ONE OF THE  PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS, STAFF  YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO ADD  THE DIAGRAM TO THE CODE AND  THAT NEVER GOT ADDED. AND I  WAS JUST CURIOUS TO NEW  DIRECTION TO AT THAT.  I KNOW  MISS LORY A FRUSTRATING TO  KNOW  >> THE FIRST RATING THERE WAS  DISCUSSION ABOUT ADDING  DIAGRAMS. THE DIAGRAM THAT IS  IN THE CURRENT CODE A LOT OF  CLEANING UP THAT IS GOING TO  TAKE TIME. WE KNOW THAT THERE  ARE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT.  WELL BE BEING BROUGHT FORWARD  TO THE THEN THAT'S INCLUDING  INCORPORATING THE NEW DIAGRAM  FOR THE OFFICE. A NEW DIAGRAM  FOR THE DOCKS. IT'S TAKE TIME  AND EFFORT AND SOMETIMES  INVESTMENT DOLLARS TO HAVE.  AND ALICE TRAITOR PROVIDE FOR  US SO WE'D LIKE TO HAVE THE  CODE ADOPTED PLACE IN THE DOT.  AND WE'LL BRING BACK THE  DIAGRAMS THAT. AND DANCE.  REGULATIONS FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE  MORE OF THIS INITIALLY OR  >> I'M GOING TO THE BONE A  SECTION OF THE CODE. BONUS  INCENTIVES. I UNDERSTAND THAT  THESE ARE STACKABLE AND IT'S  ALREADY IT'S. THEY HAVE A  PERMITTED RIGHT AND THEN IF  YOU THEY WANT BONUSES AND  INCENTIVES THOSE ARE  STACKABLE. AND I'M CURIOUS IF  DENSITY CAN STACK FOR EACH  DEVELOPMENT TYPE. FOR EXAMPLE,  THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING HAS 4  DIFFERENT EYES, THERE'S AN AGE  RESTRICTION THAT THEY MIGHT  QUALIFY FOR THIS INCENTIVE.  THEY MIGHT PUT IN A COMMUNITY  GARDEN AND AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE  CHARGING STATION. NOT TOO SURE  ABOUT THIS HURRICANE RESISTANT  INSTRUCTION BECAUSE I THOUGHT  THAT REQUIRED BY STATE LAW AND  FLORIDA BUILDING CODE BUT  ANYWAYS AND THEN MAYBE  ASSEMBLY THAT WOULD ALLOW THEM  TO STACK DENSITY ON TOP OF  WHATEVER IS ALREADY ALLOWED BY  RIGHT UP TO ABOUT MORE THAN 40  DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND  I'M CURIOUS IF THAT IS. WE  INTENDED THIS TO BE BECAUSE  THEY'RE ALLOWED 30 DWELLING  UNITS BY RIGHT AND THEN THEY  HAVE ALL THESE BONUSES AND  INCENTIVES THAT CAN BE STACKED  THAT MAKES IT 70 DWELLING  UNITS.  >> THE BUILDING HIGH  INCENTIVES DO NOT TALKING  ABOUT BUILDING HEIGHT I WAS  TALKING ABOUT DENSITY THE  BUILDING HEIGHT INCENTIVES DO  NOT STOP THERE ARE OTHER  REGULATIONS INCLUDING MINIMUM  OPEN SPACE. STORM WATER  REQUIREMENTS PARKING  REQUIREMENTS AT OFFERS THAT  ARE NATURALLY GOING HAVE THAT  ALONG WITH THE BELTON HIGH.  >> THE ACTUAL AMOUNT OF A  BONUS THAT IS ACHIEVABLE ON  ANY PARTICULAR SITE. IT'S  UNLIKELY THAT 70 UNITS PER  ACRE WILL. YOU REACHED. UNDER  AN INCENTIVE. PACKAGE WITH ALL  OF THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS THAT  BEAT OPERATE IT INTO THE  DESIGN ALONG WITH THE BUILDING  HEIGHT LIMITATIONS. PROBABLY  NOT LIKE  >> IT IS IT POSSIBLE. THEY ARE  STACKABLE TO THE EXTENT THAT  THEY CAN ACTUALLY CONSTRUCT ON  THE SIDE.  >> WHILE MEETING ALL OF OTHER  APPLICABLE REGULATIONS THAT  APPLY UP  >> AND MAYOR BEFORE LEADING TO  A FINAL ADOPTION MOTION. I  WILL. REQUEST A FEW DIFFERENT  EMOTIONS. THERE'S BEEN A MEMO  CIRCULATING AND THANK YOU  STAFF FOR SENDING US THAT MEMO  ABOUT THE TREES ON THE FRONT  YARD. I KNOW WE HAD A  DISCUSSION ABOUT DURING FIRST  READING BUT IN LIGHT OF WHAT  STAFF IN THAT MEMO THAT THEY  SENT TO US BASED ON. E-MAILS  THAT HE HAD RECEIVED FROM THE  PUBLIC AND SOME SOCIAL MEDIA  POSTS. THE INTENT TO THAT  STAFF IS SAYING IN DOES NOT  MATCH THE WORDS IN THE  DOCUMENT AND I HAD I'M KIND OF  GIVEN STAFF A HEADS UP THAT I  I WOULD BE BRINGING THIS UP  AGAIN AND HOPEFULLY THAT YOU  GUYS WOULD HAVE SOME DRAFT  DRAFT LANGUAGE READY WORK FOR  TO CAPTURE WHAT YOUR INTENT  WAS IN THE ACTUAL CODE AND I  DON'T KNOW IF YOU WERE ABLE TO  DO THAT OR IF YOU WOULD LIKE.  TO DISCUSS FURTHER.  >> I TAKE VIEW FROM THE SCREEN  UP PLEASE. WE DID NOT DRAFT  ANY NEW LANGUAGE UNDER CHAPTER  4 ARTICLE 3 SECTION 4.3 POINTS  WON WHICH THE ARTICLE IN WHICH  THE WANTED  FAMILY DWELLING UNIT  LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS ARE  INCORPORATED.  >> THERE ARE EXEMPTIONS. 4.  >> EXPANSION OF EXISTING  WANTED TO FAMILY DWELLINGS AND  EXPANSION OF EXISTING  MULTI-FAMILY. BY NO MORE THAN.  24.9% INCREASE IN GRIP OR  GROSS FLOOR AREA WILL NOT  >> SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS  OF THIS ARTICLE WERE CERTAINLY  DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO  THE ADDITION OF LANGUAGE HERE  SO MAKE IT EXPLICIT THAT  EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES  ARE NOT SUBJECT TO  REQUIREMENT. WE THINK IT'S  CLEAR THAT YOU KNOW WHAT TO  EXPECT IN YOUR EXISTING SINGLE  FAMILY HOME AND ITS NOT  APPLICABLE THAT. REASON THAT  IF YOU HAVE AN MUCH PEOPLE  LEAVE HOME AND APPLY TO YOU.  AGAIN ALL OF PROVISIONS OF  CHAPTER FOR DEVELOPMENTS AND  YOU ALRIGHT PREEXISTING  DEVELOP PROPERTY. THE START-UP  LIKE TO YOU UNLESS UNTIL YOU  COME CITY ASKING FOR A  MODIFICATION TO YOUR SITE.  >> SO MAYOR I'LL BE ASKING FOR  A COUPLE OF MOTIONS TO  INCORPORATE IN THE CODE WHAT  THE STAFF SAID IN NEAR THE  MOUNT AND FOR THOSE OF YOU  THAT ARE WATCHING IN SITTING  HERE, BUT THAT MAY NOT BE  PRIVY TO WHAT THAT MEMO IS IS  THAT STAFF WAS SAYING THAT THE  PROVISIONS OF THIS WHAT'S UP  ON THE SCREEN DO NOT APPLY TO  EXISTING HOMES EXISTING HOMES  WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO HAVE  TREES OR SHRUBS THE PROVISION  ONLY APPLIES TO NEW HOMES  BUILT AFTER JULY 1ST. IT GOES  ON FURTHER TO SAY THE CITY  WILL NEVER REQUIRE SOMEONE TO  PLANT TREES OR SHRUBS OVER  SEPTIC SYSTEM OR ANYWHERE THAT  WOULD COMPROMISE THE SO THOSE  ARE THE MOTIONS I'M GOING TO  BE LOOKING FOR BASED ON MEMO  THE MOUNT.  >> ONE OF THE LAST THINGS THAT  I'M GOING TO TRY TO DO. WAY  BACK IN NOVEMBER OF 2022 WE  HAD A WORKSHOP THAT TALKED  ABOUT GENERAL PROVISIONS AND I  WAS REMISS IN NOT BRINGING  THIS UP LAST READING. THERE  WAS A PROVISION IN RELATION TO  THE COMP PLAN THAT SAID AND  SHARON'S TO PRESCRIBE  STANDARDS BY THE LAND  DEVELOPER OF THOSE REQUIRED  IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT BECOME  A CHARGE ON THIS CITIZENS AND  TAXPAYERS EXISTING AREAS. THIS  WAS REMOVED AT FIRST READING I  BELIEVE THAT WAS ALSO REMOVED  AT THE DRAFT I DIDN'T GET A  CHANCE TO DOUBLE CHECK THAT  AND I REALLY THINK THAT'S A  VERY IMPORTANT PROVISION. I  DON'T KNOW WHY IT WAS REMOVED  BETWEEN NOVEMBER OF 20 TO  CAUSE WE NEVER DISCUSSED UNTIL  THE I KNOW DRAFT BUT I REALLY  THINK IT NEEDS TO BE BACK IN  THERE BECAUSE IT STATES  EXPLICITLY SAYING THAT THE  EXISTING TAXPAYERS ARE GOING  TO HAVE TO PAY FOR THE LAND  DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND  IMPROVEMENTS SO AGAIN MAYOR I  WILL BE ASKING FOR MOTION ON  THAT ONE. THE LAST MOTION I  WILL MAKE.  ♪ ♪ IT'S A FINAL PLEA TO MY  COMMISSIONERS. TO NOTIFY  PROPERTY OWNERS THAT'S OUR  PROPERTY IS BEING REZONED I  HAD PHONE CALL TODAY FROM THE  CITIZEN SO UPSET BECAUSE THEY  JUST FOUND OUT THAT THEY  CANNOT BUILD A HOUSE ON THEIR  PROPERTY IF THIS REZONING GOES  THROUGH. IS. UNCONSCIONABLE.  >> WE HAD A WE HAD.  >> REZONE JUST EARLIER TODAY  IN PARK THAT DEVELOPER WAS  REQUIRED TO NOTIFY THE  PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 1300  FEET OF THAT PROPERTY THAT  DEVELOPED WAS REQUIRED TO HAVE  A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. MY  REQUEST IS NOT TO NOTIFY. THE  PROPERTIES WITHIN 1300 FEET.  SO TOO WITH LEAST NOTIFY THE  PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE BEING  AFFECTED. SO AGAIN I WILL BE  SEEKING ANOTHER TOP OPTION.  OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE ANOTHER  MOTION TO REQUIRE THIS AND IF  WE HAVE TO PUSH OUT SECOND  READING TO A 3RD READING AND  THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO DO. I  HAVE PLENTY THAT I CAN TALK  ABOUT PLENTY MORE REQUESTS  THAT I REALLY THINK NEED TO BE  CAPTURED IN THIS CODE. BUT I  PROMISED MYSELF I WOULD STICK  TO 5. AND THEN AT THE END I  WILL HAVE COMMENTS AND I WILL  BE REQUESTING TO MAKE A FEW  MOTIONS MAYOR.  >> OKAY. COMMISSIONER RICHARD  YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.  ♪ ♪ >> NO MA'AM.  >> OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT. GRAHAM.  >> SECTION 1006.3  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FUND  DOES NOT INCLUDE THIS INCLUDE  THE SALARY FOR THE NEWLY HIRED  ENVIRONMENTAL EMPLOYEES  IN NORTH PORT IF NOT PROPOSE  THAT THE TREE FUND CAN BE USED  TO COVER THEIR SALARIES.  >> AND HER HAVE FOLLOWED ROLE  IN ALL OF AND JANICE  >> EVENING AGAIN. THIS SO MUCH  I HAVE BEEN REVIEWING THIS YOU  WILL SEETHING US NOW I HAVE  WORKED WITH THE CITY. ALMOST  8, 9, YEARS. SPECIFICALLY  ENDANGERED AND THREATENED  SPECIES THAT I HAVE SEEN THAT  IN THIS. A LOT OF THE  RECOMMENDATIONS THAT I WE BOTH  AGREED UPON I'M NOT THERE.  THEY'RE MISSING.  >> AS FAR AS THE.  >> ULDC I SEE THAT A LOT OF.  THE AUTHORITY AND  DECISION-MAKING. IS GOING  TOWARDS. AND HANDLED BY  ADMINISTRATION. NOT COMING  BEFORE THE COMMISSION. WHAT'S  UP WITH THAT. WHY ISN'T COMING  BEFORE THE COMMISSION A LOT OF  THESE DEVELOPMENT AND WE JEWS  AND IT'S LIKE WE'RE THE CHECKS  AND BALANCES ITS STAFF  RUNNING. THE CITY AND I MEAN  NO DISRESPECT TO ANYBODY ON  STAFF BECAUSE I ALMOST KNOW  ALL OF YOU AND AND I RESPECT  ALL OF YOU. THIS IS A GENERAL  STATEMENT THAT IS JUST NOT  RIGHT. LEGISLATIVE BODY. THE  COMMISSION RUNS THE CITY. AND  YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO HAVE TO SAY  SO THAT STAFF MAKING UP AND  ALL THE SUDDEN WE HAVE NO WAY  AND NO RECOURSE EXCEPT TO JUST  SAY OH WELL, WE DON'T EVEN  KNOW THINGS ANYMORE BECAUSE  NOW THEY'RE NOT COMING BEFORE  THE COMMISSION. SO I'M PRETTY  OUTRAGED ABOUT THAT. AS  FOLLOWS THE ULDC ADMINISTRATOR  IN THE LAND. MEAN NO  DISRESPECT. YOU DON'T HAVE THE  EXPERTISE AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL  SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS AND THE  DECISION MAKING WITH SOME OF  THOSE HISTORIC FINDINGS AND  WHAT I'M SEEING YEAR. YOU GET  THE SO YOU CAN DETERMINE THAT  THE SCHOOL IS HISTORIC. ALL  LOGIC LEE SIGNIFICANT. WELL  THAT'S WHAT IT'S THAT'S WHAT'S  IN THERE.  >> ANOTHER THING IS THE LITTLE  SALT SPRING, YOU HAVE A UP TO  6. THAT THE ABUSES. SPECIAL  EXCEPTION. WHAT IS A SPECIAL  EXCEPTION FOR A LITTLE SALT  SPRINGS, SHOULD BE NO SPECIAL  EXCEPTIONS. EDITION THING BUT  THE WARM MINERAL SPRINGS, THE  ADMINISTRATOR HAS THE POWER  ASSESSING SIGNIFICANT AGAINST  FINES AND NOTIFICATIONS SHOULD  BE IMMEDIATE AND WORK OR WHAT  SHOULD CEASE IMMEDIATELY.  >> THAT SHOULD BE A TWO-WAY 2  DAY WAITING PERIOD.  >> SO WE NEED A THE SCHOOL A  LOCK UP THE AL JUST ON STAFF  WHERE WE NEED TO CONFER WITH  THE COUNTY'S ARCHAEOLOGISTS  AND SOME OF THE SIGNIFICANT  FINDINGS, YOU DON'T HAVE THAT  EXPERTISE ON SORRY. FAR AS THE  GOPHER TORTOISE IS THE WORD  HARM ALSO NEEDS TO BE  INCORPORATED INTO ITS NOT JUST  PROTECTION OF THE IT WAS THE  GOPHER TORTOISE IT'S ALSO  ACHES.  >> FLORIDA SCRUB GO ON AND ON  0 BC IT'S IT'S CRAZY.  >> THANK YOU MISS ROBIN. WE  HAVE OTHER.  >> ITS ROLE ALL OF THE YEAR  AND THEN JANICE WHAT WORKED.  >> COMMISSIONERS THANK YOU  APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY  TALK LES MISERABLES OVER. I  LOVE THAT THE 2 WENT THROUGH  WHAT PERRY AND THEY HAVE OF  OUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND  I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOU TO  CAREFULLY CONSIDER. THE POINT  HURT OF THE ONES THAT DO YOU  MAKE THAT THEY FOR YOU'D UP.  NEW ULDC. GO BACK TO ONE OF  THE COMMENTS THAT THAT YOU  HEARD EARLIER WHICH WAS NOT TO  CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF  DENSITY. TRADITIONALLY HAS  BEEN A NUMBER OF UNITS PER  ACRE. WITH ULDC SECTION 3, 3,  WHEN THIS ALLOWED THE DENSITY  BECAUSE UNTREATED FROM A LARGE  PARCEL OF WHAT IS DIVIDED INTO  SMALLER PARCELS WITHOUT  LIMITATION. THIS HAS  WIDESPREAD IMPLICATIONS NOT  VERY QUICK. BUT A WEAPON  TIRES, IT. WHAT NEW A  DEFINITION IS CODIFIED IN THE  ULDC ARGUABLY IT BECOMES  ENTIRE MONTH FOR EVERY DEVELOP  AND SAY PROBABLY CAN'T TAKE  AWAY FROM THAT. IT'S AN SO  WITH THAT WHAT ARE SOME OF THE  IMPLICATIONS IF IN AREA IS LOW  DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IN THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH IS MY  NEIGHBORHOOD. DO NEW DENSITY  CALCULATION TO NEW DENSITY  CALCULATION TO PUT EXTREMELY  HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENTS NEXT  A SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN  VIOLATION. THE 4 POINT OH  DENSITY LIMITATION UNDER THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH YOU  HAVE A PRO. EITHER WAY THIS IS  EXACTLY WHAT VERY DEVELOPER IS  TRYING TO DO A PARCEL K.  JUSTIFY BUILDING A 150 CONDOS  IN FOR STORY BUILDINGS ON THE  PARCEL THE DENSITY WAS  CALCULATED USING ENTIRE 391  ACRES WHICH OF WHICH INCLUDES.  GOLF COURSE LAND WE'RE PART OF  THE K IS LOCATED. THE DENSITY  FOR THE PROJECT HAS IT TURNED  OUT TO BE A 15.3 5, 3, 8,  UNITS PER ACRE IT SAID A 4.0.  THIS PROJECT IS CURRENTLY  UNDER APPEAL BY OUR H.O.A. FOR  THIS REASON AND FOR OTHER  REASONS. THE SAME 291 ACRES  INCLUDES 15 HOLES OF GOLF.  OWNED AARON CREEK GOLF COUNTRY  CUP. YOU IS A NEW ULDC DENSITY  TO BE USED JUSTIFY CONVERTING  ANY GOLF COURSE LAND TO BUILD  HOUSING UNITS. AND THEY LET  OUR ATTORNEY ADDRESS SOME OF  POINT.  COMMISSIONERS AND IS  JANICE WILBUR NORTH PORT  FLORIDA. WELL HERE WE GO  AGAIN.  >> HOMEOWNERS ON PRICE  BOULEVARD BETWEEN SUMTER AND  TOLEDO BLADE. BUT NOW THE  HOMEOWNERS BEHIND PRICE  BOULEVARD ARE NOW IN JEOPARDY  AS WELL. EVERY TIME WE HAVE A  NEW CITY MANAGER. AND 3 NEW  MEMBERS ON THE COMMISSION.  THINGS BEGIN TO CHANGE. THINK  THEY ALWAYS HAVE A BETTER  IDEA. UNFORTUNATELY. THIS THEY  WANT TO CHANGE RESIDENTIAL  PROPERTY TO COMMERCIAL  PROPERTY. WHY THE RESIDENCE  PRICE BOULEVARD. BETWEEN  SUMTER AND TOLEDO BLADE.  ALWAYS PICKED THIS ISN'T  ESTABLISHED AREA. YET THIS  AREA'S ALWAYS A MAIN TARGET.  IT'S NOT THE WIDENING PRICE  BOULEVARD THAT WE'RE CONCERNED  ABOUT NOW. THIS IS THE  CHANGING A RESIDENTIAL  PROPERTY TO COMMERCIAL  PROPERTY. THIS IS OUR CONCERN.  IT'S QUITE OBVIOUS. BUT THESE  4 BOARD MEMBERS AND THE CITY  MANAGER COULD CARE LESS ABOUT  HOMEOWNERS THAT THIS AFFECTED  BY THIS. BECAUSE IT DOESN'T  AFFECT THEIR HOME. AND IT  DOESN'T COME.  IN FACT OR COULD EFFECT. THE  NEIGHBORHOOD. WELL REALLY  DON'T THEY LIKE HOW MANY HOMES  WOULD BE AFFECTED ON THE EAST  SIDE OF TOLEDO BLADE. HOW MANY  AREAS ARE OPEN. AND  ESPECIALLY. HAVE I REACHED OUT  TO COMMISSIONERS. MISTER AND  MISS WHITE. REGARDING THIS  CHANGE. MISTER EMERY DIDN'T  RETURN MY CALL AND HE SAID TO  ME DON'T WORRY. LOOK HOW MANY  YEARS IT TOOK TO WIDEN PRICE.  WILL NOT HAPPEN. WELL MISTER  EMERGE. WELL CALL FAST THIS  COMMISSION HAS HAS MOVED TO  PUNISH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AGAIN.  ARE YOU VOTING FOR THIS  CHANGE. I PRAY NOT THIS WHITE.  YOU NEVER RETURNED MY CALL. AS  THAT CALL AND I EXPLAINED WHY  I WAS CALLING YOU. DO NOT CARE  ABOUT THE PEOPLE THAT VOTED  FOR YOU TO BE A COMMISSIONER  YOU ASKED FOR OUR BOAT. NOW WE  ARE ASKING FOR YOUR VOTE.  PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE  RESIDENTIAL. 2 COMMERCIAL  PROPERTY. WHAT WILL HAPPEN  WITH THE HOMEOWNERS. INSURANCE  AND TAXES GOING FROM  RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL. DID  THINK ABOUT THIS. NO BECAUSE  IT DIDN'T AFFECT YOU OR  DOESN'T AFFECT YOU. WELL  REMEMBER WHAT GOES AROUND  COMES AROUND. A FORMER  COMMISSIONER MISTER BLITZER  WAS ALL FOR THE DOLLAR  GENERAL. VOTED AGAINST US. BUT  NOW MISTER BLITZER WHO LIVED  SABAL TRACE GOLF COMMUNITY.  >> COMMUNITY WAS HAPPENING  WASN'T TALKING AND HAVING HIS  OWN PRIVACY. HE HAS NO A  PRIVATE SOMETHING THAT THANK  YOU. MINUTES IS WANT TO SAY  YES. I CERTAINLY HOPE SO.  >> THOMAS CAKE. AND AND CHUCK  ENGLISH.  >> THOMAS GERMAN. I LIVE IN  CITY OF PORT. RIGHT BEHIND THE  DOLLAR GENERAL. SO I'VE BEEN  DOWN THIS ROAD BEFORE I KNOW A  LITTLE WHAT ABOUT. IT SEEMS  LIKE IT. EVERY TIME THE BOARD  GET THE BALL GOT THERE, BUT.  THEY WANT TO CHANGE THINGS AND  NOT FAVOR OF THE PEOPLE PUT  YOU THERE. I'M NOT GOING TO  IT. I DON'T YOU WANT TO VOTE  YOU VOTE FOR THAT CHANGE  INCLUDING THE CITY MANAGER AS  I KNOW, HE'S GOT GO RIGHT  BEHIND IT. YOUR PEOPLE IF YOU  WANT YOUR JOB. AGAINST IT. BUT  TELLING YOU RIGHT CAMPAIGN  AGAINST AS HARD ANYTHING. IF  YOU VOTE FOR WE HAVE SOMETHING  ELSE RIGHT.  >> WELL WHEN IT WAS GREAT 5286  PLAYED INSIDE HERE IN CREEK.  SO TO READ THIS TO YOU BUT I  WANT MAKE SURE I GET CORRECTED  SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE GOING GET  RIPPED A RED BUT OFTEN YOU  FOUND YOURSELF IN  CONVERSATION.  >> SOMEONE HAD SAID SOMETHING  ELSE WITH I WORRY ABOUT KIDS  AND GRANDCHILDREN. IF WE  SPECIALLY YOU'RE THE  COMMISSIONERS, A  PRESERVING NORTH PORT KEEPING  ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY FOR  CHILDREN AND FAMILIES HOW CAN  WE KEEP SELLING OUT TO  DEVELOPERS TO TAKE AWAY. ALL  OF THE GREEN SPACE AVAILABLE  AND FILL IT WITH A CONCRETE  METAL VERY SIMILAR SABAL  TRACE. I HAVE THAT THE BIG  IT'S ONE STILL A SCRUB JAYS  AND THE COMMISSIONERS ALLOWED  THE DEVELOPER TO CLOSE  SANCTUARY THAT THE TREES AND  THE PLANTS AND HERE IN CREEK  CLEAN THE YEAR AND PROVIDE  SHELTER FOR NUMEROUS ANIMALS  WELL AS ENJOYMENT FOR ITS  RESIDENTS. THE LAND. THE GOLF  COURSE IN HERE CREATE PROVIDES  ENTERTAINMENT NOT ONLY ARE  CREEK RESIDENTS. BUT FOR MANY  A NORTH PORT RESIDENTS AND  VISITORS. IT ALSO IS A OF  EMPLOYMENT FOR MANY OF OUR  RESIDENTS. ALLOWING MORE  BUILDING ON THE GOLF COURSE IN  CREEK PROPERTY. JUST TAKES WAY  SO MANY AVAILABLE RESOURCES.  DO THE RIGHT THING FOR TODAY  AND FOR THE FUTURE DON'T SO TO  THE DEVELOPER AND SHORT  CHANGE. YOUR RESIDENCE. THE  VOICE OF THE CITIZENS. THAT'S  WHY WE ELECTED YOU.  >> NOW I'D LIKE TO TRY ONE  EVERYTHING OK IF YOU DON'T ALL  THIS IS ABOUT THE TIME YOU  NEED TO BREAK ANY WAY TO SIT  BACK IN YOUR CHAIR CLOSE YOUR  EYES THINK ABOUT ONE MOST  IMPORTANT. TRANSACTION THAT  YOU TOOK PART. I IT WAS IT WAS  THE MOST IMPORTANT YOU ARE  **** HAPPY ABOUT IT YOU  COULDN'T WAIT TO GET IT, OKAY.  COULD BE YOU TIRED I'M LIKE MY  ARE COULD BEEN SOMETHING ELSE  ALL RIGHT. BUT YOU'VE GOT THAT  OKAY. IT'S SO HAPPY YOU WERE  THESE ARE THE RULES THIS IS  WHAT IT WILL COST. AND YOU  WANT IT. NOW OPEN UP YOUR EYES  FIND OUT THE DEVELOPER LIFE.  >> BEFORE  >> YOU START THE CLOCK TO I  THINK FIREPLACE FOR ADEQUATE  TIME IS TONIGHT. YES,  EVERYBODY GETS I'M GLAD YOU  ANSWERED CONCERNS THERE ABOUT  THE TEENS. EMPLOYEES HAVE OPEN  EARS AND MINDS ABOUT THIS  BECAUSE THIS IS REALLY REALLY  IMPORTANT THE PEOPLE EFFECTS.  THIS WOULD DELETE FROM YOUR  DEFINITIONS. THE DEFINITION OF  CITY AND WITH ROSE WHICH SAYS  TODAY THAT WHEN YOU'RE  CALCULATING DENSITY IT'S BASED  ON THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN THE  ACRE IN THE PARCEL. FROM FROM  THE DEFINITIONS. INSTEAD YOU  HAVE SOMETHING THE STAFF'S  POINTED TO THAT SAYS YOU LOOK  AT THE NUMBER PARCEL. AND  THEY'VE ADDED SOMETHING TO SAY  YOU TAKE THE WHOLE AREA. IN  THE HERE CREEK. AND YOU CAN IT  ALL DOWN TO A SINGLE PARCEL OR  WHATEVER HASN'T BEEN USED LIKE  THEY'RE DOING PARTIAL PAY AND  THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THIS IS  NONSENSE. IT'S NOT LOW DENSITY  RESIDENTIAL WHEN YOU HAVE MORE  THAN HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.  BEING BUILT NEXT TO SINGLE  FAMILY HOMES AND HOW CAN YOU  SAY YOU'RE INCREASING THE  RATIO OF COMMERCIAL  RESIDENTIAL. WHEN YOU'RE  STRIPPING AWAY ALL THE LIMITS  ARE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN  PORT. POLICIES SUCH AS THIS  AND STAFF SAYS IF YOU DON'T  ADD THIS NEW POLICY. THEY  CAN'T CONTINUE TO HAVE POSTER  HOUSING. IT HAD CLOSED OR  HOUSING AND THE CURRENT POLICY  THAT WE WANT YOU EAT. ITS  TOTAL GASLIGHTING SAY THAT.  AND THEN TO THE OTHER AND THAT  IS THE WHAT WAS ON THE OTHER  DAY THAT YOU DIDN'T ALLOW THAT  RESPOND TO IS COMPLETELY  INADEQUATE GASLIGHT AGO.  THE SAY THAT. WHEN THE THE BRI  CREEK EXPIRES. IF THE GOLF  WANTS  ANY NEW ZONING. OR DEVELOPMENT  RIGHTS OR A NEW COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN PROVISION. YOU HAVE TO  AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN  AS A FOOTNOTE AND ACTIVITY  CENTER 2 LOT OF POLICY. BY  THAT PLACEMENT COULD BE ARGUED  NOT TO APPLY THE REST OF  HEARING CREEK. AND WHAT  HAPPENS WHEN THE DEVELOPERS  ALREADY SAID THEY THEY HAVE AN  INTEREST AND DEVELOPING THE  GOLF COURSE COUPLE YEARS AGO.  WHEN EXPIRES THE DEVELOPER IS  GOING TO ARGUE THEY HAVE WITH  THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT  THAT THAT PROPERTY. WHICH IS  ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND  ZONING CODE RESIDENTIAL  DEVELOPMENT AT A LIMITED  DENSITY BASED ON WHAT I JUST  CRITICIZED BEFORE. SO THIS  INADEQUATE PROVISION DOESN'T  GIVE YOU COVER. YOU'RE LEAVING  A VERY PRETTY EXPOSED.  RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE  GOLF COURSE. THE CHANGES BEING  MADE IN THIS ULDC BECAUSE  YOU'RE STRIPPING REALLY MASTER  PLANS. I HAVE SPECIFIC WORDING  TO GIVE YOU IS SPECIFIC  SECTION THAT WOULD KEEP THE  MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT. AND  CITY COMMISSION CONTROL ONCE  THE DRI EXPIRED.  >> LED OFF BUT I THINK YOU  JUST HAVE STILL FACES AND THAT  I SAY THAT THAT'S A LITTLE  >> GOOD EVENING.  >> I WISH I COULD GIVE BACK MY  5 MINUTE 3 MINUTES. HE'S KNOWS  WHAT HE'S SAYING TO YOU. AND  YOU KNOW A SINCERE AND HE'S  RIGHT. THERE'S NO DOUBT. AND  WHAT YOU'RE DOING THESE PEOPLE  HERE IN CREEK. IS NOT RIGHT. I  REMEMBER HAD FREQUENT AS MARCH  STREET YOU ARE AND THEN THEY  CHANGED AGAIN HERE IS WE NEED  THAT ALL RIGHT. THE THING THAT  ELIMINATED WAS A LOT OF.  ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT AND THEY  SWITCH TO HERON CREEK. YOU  STILL NEED TO REMEMBER ABOUT  THE LANDFILL STILL AIR AND  THEY ASKED X AND ALL. AREA  ALONG THAT AREA. TO INCLUDE.  >> SO IT WILL TRACE SO RACE IS  AN EXAMPLE.  >> WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.  BEEN HEARING FROM PEOPLE WE'LL  HAVE. BUT AS YOU TO A NEW  SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE.  YOU'VE BEEN HERE AND SUBJECT  MATTER HAS EXPERTISE FROM  ROBIN, EVEN HERE IN SUBJECT  MATTER EXPERTISE FOR MANY MANY  OTHER CITIZENS. CHANGES YOUR  MOOD CAN TONIGHT. AFFECT THIS  COMMUNITY FOR DECADES. AND YOU  KNOW THAT TOO. LISTEN TO SOME  OF THESE QUESTIONS LISTEN TO  SOME OF THESE ANSWERS LISTEN  TO SOME OF THESE PERSPECTIVES.  I'M GOING TO MAIN POINT.  THEY'RE REZONING. THERE'S NO  STATE STATUTE THAT SAYS YOU  CAN NOT. AND FOR HIM. PUBLIC.  THE REZONING OF THEIR  PROPERTIES. ONLY REASON YOU'RE  DOING IT AS YOU DON'T WANT  MORE PEOPLE KNOW SO THEY MAY  GO WHAT I'M HEARING ABOUT AS A  CLASS ACTION SUIT. IT. BUT THE  CITY DOESN'T CARE BECAUSE  THEY'VE GOT THE PACKETS THE  TAXPAYERS POCKETS. THANK YOU.  THANK YOU. MISTER ENGLISH.  THAT'S OK.  >> ALL RIGHT DO WE HAVE ANY  OTHER COMMENTS BEFORE I KNOW  COMMISSIONER WANTS TO MAKE  SOME OCEANS BUT OTHER.  COMMISSIONERS DID YOU WANT  GOOD FINAL COMMENT.  COMMISSIONER LANGDON I'M GOOD  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE OU THERE  DID YOU WANT ANY COMMENTS  QUESTIONS.  >> YES MAYOR. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL GOING TO BRING UP  ABOUT THE NOTIFICATIONS I DID  ASK THE CITY MANAGER AND ON  ONE. LAST WEEK AND US TO GET  BACK WITH ME YESTERDAY BUT DUE  TO THE STORMS AND EVERYTHING  AND NEVER GOT A REPLY FROM HIM  IF WAS ANY OTHER TYPE OF  ALTERNATIVES THAT WE COULD USE  AS A NOTIFICATION TOOL. SO MY  QUESTION IS TO THE CITY  MANAGER DID YOU GET ANY OF  THAT INFORMATION THAT I ASK  FOR.  >> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER  EMERICH GOT NO I DID NOT  YOU'RE RIGHT. I WAS DISTRACTED  BY THE OTHER THING FOR ALL OF  THE STORE. WE HAVE TALKED TO  >> WE DID DISCUSS OPTIONS THAT  WE  >> MIGHT BE HELPFUL NOTIFY  OUR. SO THIS IS ESPECIALLY  THOSE WHO HAVE NOT BEEN OR NOT  HERE.  >> TO PARTICIPATE IN PROCESS,  AS FAR AS THE ACTION THAT WE  HAVE TAKEN WE HAVE THE RULES  AND A LOT OF THAT'S NOT WHAT  YOU'RE CONCERNED WAS BUT  PEOPLE LISTENING. THIS MAKE  SURE THAT THEY UNDERSTAND JUST  BECAUSE WE FOLLOW THE LAW YOU  DON'T LIKE THE FACT THAT WE  FOLLOW THE LAW DOESN'T MEAN WE  NEED TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT  FROM THE LAW BECAUSE WE DIDN'T  FOLLOW THE LAW YOU WOULD  ACCUSE US OF BREAKING THE LAW  WHICH WOULD BE ACCURATE. SO  MOVING THE GOALPOST ON WHAT WE  NEED TO DO IS NOT THERE TO  THIS PROCESS BUT ANSWER YOUR  QUESTION WE ARE TRYING TO  SOMETHING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE  LET THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT  HERE IN THOSE LOTS THAT ARE BE  AWARE BASED ON THERE. NOT  BEING HERE ON ANNUAL BASIS IN  THE CITY.  >> I THOUGHT. THAT'S ALL I  HAVE MY RIGHT NOW OKAY. THANK  YOU.  >> I JUST WANTED TO.  >> THIS IS. AT A DIFFICULT  TOPIC BUT SOME AND ELECTED  OFFICIALS PEOPLE HAVE LIED YOU  THINK ELECTED OFFICIALS TO  JUST DO WHAT WHAT YOU WANT TO  SEE OR CERTAIN GROUPS OF  PEOPLE. WE HAVE A  REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF  GOVERNMENT IN THIS COUNTRY AND  THAT MEANS THAT. WE HAVE TO  MAKE DECISIONS THAT ARE IN THE  BEST INTEREST FOR ALL THE  PEOPLE THAT MEAN EVERYONE IS  GOING TO BE HAPPY. NO THAT'S  IMPOSSIBLE TO DO YOU HAVE THE  COURTESY OF SPEAKING WITHOUT  INTERRUPTION I WOULD LIKE TO  HAVE THE SAME. THANK YOU VERY  MUCH.  >> I'VE LIVED HERE SINCE 1990.  >> AND BELIEVE ME WHEN I CAME  HERE, I DIDN'T WANT TO SEE  THINGS CHANGE EITHER. BUT I  KNOW THAT NORTH PORT IS NOT.  CITY THAT IT WAS BACK THEN IN  FACT I CALLED IT HOW WE CALL  THAT THE TOWN. BUT THINGS DO  CHANGE AND. I WE HAVE TO  EXCEPT THE REZONING OF PRICE  BOULEVARD. THAT'S GOING TO BE  5 LANES OF OF ASPHALT AND THAT  IS NOT GOING TO GET PEOPLE WHO  ARE LIVING THERE THE SAME  EXPERIENCE THAT MAYBE THERE  HAVING NOW EVEN NOW IT'S NOT.  GOOD TO HAVE 2 LANES OF  TRAFFIC BACKED UP AND THOSE  ARE NOT JUST CARS. THOSE ARE  CEMENT TRUCKS DUMP TRUCKS GO  DOWN THERE AND YOU HAVE 5  LANES OF THAT AND IN FRONT OF  YOUR HOUSE AND THEIR PEOPLE  THERE THAT I SPOKE TO THAT  WANT TO GET OUT, BUT THEY  CANNOT SELL THEIR HOUSE AS A  SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE OR SOMEONE  WHO'S GOING TO BUY IT TO RAISE  A FAMILY THERE. EVEN PEOPLE  WHO THOUGHT THEY WERE GOING TO  DEVELOP THEIR PROPERTY TO  RETIRE THEY DECIDED THAT'S NOT  THE PLACE FOR THEM ANYMORE  EVEN WERE I LIVE. THERE WERE  PROPERTIES THAT HAD BEEN SINCE  THE 70'S AND I REMEMBER TRYING  TO CONTACT PEOPLE TO SELL  BECAUSE I JUST WANTED TO KEEP  IT AND EVENTUALLY THEY ENDED  UP SELLING TO PEOPLE WHO  DEVELOP BECAUSE EVEN THEY SAID  10 YEARS AGO NORTH PORT IS NOT  WHAT IT WAS WHEN WE FIRST  LOOKED AT IT CITIES CHANGE  PLACES CHANGE. AND I DON'T  THINK ANY OF THOSE PEOPLE THAT  NEED ANOTHER OPTION. FOR  SELLING THEIR HOUSES SELLING  THE PROPERTIES ON THESE THESE  CORRIDORS AND THEY WERE NOT  JUST CHOSE THEM RANDOMLY THESE  ARE IN CERTAIN AREAS FOR A  REASON. I'VE BEEN TO OTHER  AREAS AND AND ALWAYS OBSERVE  THINGS LIKE A LONG 7.76. I'VE  MENTIONED 17TH STREET UP IN  SARASOTA AT FRUITVILLE ROAD  MOST OF YOU ONLY APPROVED  PROBE ROAD FOR WHAT IT LOOKS  LIKE NOW WHEN I CAME HERE  THOSE ARE ORANGE GROVES OUT  THERE WITH THE LITTLE LITTLE  HOUSES THAT WAS NEVER GOING TO  STAY THAT WAY AND THE AREAS  THAT DID IT. THEY'RE NOT THAT  RIGHT THEY'RE NOT GREAT AREAS  BECAUSE THEY HAVE AGAIN 5  LANES OF ASPHALT IN FRONT OF  THEIR HOUSES. SO THIS ISN'T A  TAKE UNLIKELY, BUT A LIGHTLY  BUT AGAIN YOU HAVE TO MAKE  SOME DIFFICULT DECISIONS HERE  DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU'RE GOING  TO LIKE THEM AND OBVIOUSLY YOU  DON'T. BUT PEOPLE HAVE TO MAKE  TOUGH DECISIONS. I WISH  COMMISSION'S 2 YEARS AGO,  MAYBE SOME OF DECISIONS AND WE  WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE ADDRESSING  THIS THE WAY WE ARE NOW. I  KNOW THERE WAS A COMMENT MADE  ABOUT THE ULDC THE STAFF  HAVING THE ABILITY TO APPROVE  PROJECTS I UNDERSTAND THAT'S  FOR IF THEY'RE IN A 100%  COMPLIANCE THAT MEANS THEY ALL  THE BOXES HAVE BEEN CHECKED  ALL THOSE BOXES THAT WE HAVE  ALL RIGHT HE SAID. IT SHOULD  BE THAT'S THAT'S IT THERE  REALLY IS NO REASON TO COME  HERE IF IF YOU FOLLOW THE  RULES AND IT'S THE SAME THING  WHEN YOU HAD YOUR HOUSE AND I  HAVE TO SAY WE'RE ALL  DEVELOPERS WE ALL DEVELOP A  PLAN TO BUILD A HOUSE. IF YOU  CHECKED ALL THOSE BOXES ON  THAT LIST. YOU WOULDN'T WANT  SOMEBODY SAYING WELL, YES, BUT  WE'D LIKE YOU TO DO THIS TO  YOUR PROPERTY BECAUSE I LIVED  NEXT DOOR TO YOU. IT'S REALLY  THE SAME NO MATTER IF IT'S A  LARGE LARGE-SCALE DEVELOPMENT  OR NOT IT'S STILL DEVELOPING  PROPERTY. AND PRETTY I JUST  HAVE TO CLARIFY THAT WITH THAT  BECAUSE I WASN'T ABOUT MISTER  ENGLISH MENTIONED HERON CREEK  YES, I REMEMBER THAT THAT WAS  MARSH CREEK I HAD TREAT THE  GOES THROUGH THERE. THERE WAS  A SCRUB JAY STUDY DONE BY JON  THAXTON AND AT THE TIME THEY  DID NOT ENOUGH INE WIDE SCOPE  JASON THAT AREA EVEN THOUGH WE  QUESTION THAT THAT IS WHAT THE  ACTUAL STUDY SAYS WHICH I DO  HAVE A HOWEVER WITH IDENTIFIED  HAVING SCRUB JAY HABITAT  THAT'S REALLY WHAT WHAT WAS IN  THAT STUDY AND THAT'S HOW THAT  AREA WAS DEVELOPED WHETHER  OR NOT I AGREE WITH THAT OR  YOU AGREE WITH THAT THAT IS  REALLY WHAT IS OFFICIAL SO  JUST WANT TO PUT THAT OUT  THERE. WITH THINK I'VE HAD MY.  MIKE PENCE HERE. YEAH. AND I  DON'T THINK JUST PART I THINK  MOST OF YOU WERE NOT HERE  CHARLOTTE COUNTY HAD THEIR  MURDOCH VILLAGE IDEA. AND THAT  WAS THEIR ATTEMPT. TOO REZONE  BECAUSE THEY KNEW THAT THEY  COULD NEVER AFFORD TO BRING  INFRASTRUCTURE THERE AND THEY  ACTUALLY USED EMINENT DOMAIN  IT WAS A TERRIBLE TERRIBLE  PROCESS. I DON'T EVER WANT TO  SEE THE CITY GET TO THAT POINT  WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO  CONSIDER THAT IN ORDER TO NOT  HAVE ALL OF THE TAX BURDEN  SHOULDERED BY RESIDENTS  BECAUSE PREVIOUS COMMISSIONS  DIDN'T ACT. ON IT THAT'S  FINALLY COMING TO AN END OVER  THERE IN CHARLOTTE COUNTY BUT  THAT'S NOT SOMETHING WE EVER  WANT TO SEE HERE. SORRY I  WOULD WAS ON A SOAPBOX THERE  FOR A WHILE WHICH I'M NOT  COMFORTABLE WITH THIS IS  SOMETHING I HAD TO SAY.  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> LOOKING AT THE WEBSITE AND  IT DOES HAVE A SUB MIDDLE  CHECKLIST FOR A FENCE OR A  SHED FOR A PERMIT AND IT WAS  REVISED IN NOVEMBER OF 2023,  AND IT DOES REQUIRE A PERMIT  APPLICATION PROPERTY ID NUMBER  4 COPIES OF THE SURVEY. HI  TYPE OF FENCE INCLUDED IN THIS  AND A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT  OF THE JOBS OVER $5,000.  REMOVING THIS REQUIREMENT  THERE IS NO NOTICE OF  COMMENCEMENT TO THERE IS NO  CHECKS AND BALANCES TO ENSURE  THAT THE FENCES ON THE  PROPERTY ON THE CORRECT  PROPERTY OWNER'S PROPERTY. I  WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A FEW  MOTIONS MAYOR SEE HOW THEY  WILL FLY.  >> OKAY GOING BACK TO THE  FENCE.  >> THE CODE REQUIRES A VINYL  COATED BLACK OR GREEN COLORED.  CHAIN-LINK FENCE. DON'T KNOW  WHY THAT'S EVEN NECESSARY  ESPECIALLY IN RESIDENTIAL  AREA. I BEFORE I MAKE THE  MOTION IS I'D LIKE TO GET  STAFFS UNDERSTANDING AS TO WHY  WE HAVE TO HAVE A FINAL COVID.  BLACK OR GREEN IN A  RESIDENTIAL ZONE. THAT WAS A  QUESTION. I DON'T CLOTHING  CHAIN LIKE VERY  >> OUR BOND SYSTEM TRACTOR  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES THAT'S  NOT UNCOMMON FOR CITIES TO  ONLY ALLOW OUR FINAL CUT OFF.  I KNOW HOW DID FOR US AND  ONGOING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE  CHAIN-LINK FENCES DO TEND TO  ROSS AND EVENTUALLY. THAT HER  FROM. THE AESTHETICS OF THE  NEIGHBORHOOD SO THE FINAL  COATING. INCREASES THE  LONGEVITY OF THAT FENCING AND  KEEPS THE NEIGHBORHOODS KNOTS.  >> THANK YOU FOR THAT MAKE A  MOTION MAYOR OF GOT ONE. SO  LET YOU KNOW HOW MANY OF ONE  TOO. 3, 4, MOTIONS ALL RIGHT,  LET'S START WITH NUMBER ONE OK  NUMBER TO MAKE A MOTION TO  REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT OF  VINYL COATING FOR SINGLES.  SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.  >> OWNING DISTRICTS. OK SO IF  THE MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  REGARDING FENCES TO REMOVE THE  VINYL COATING IN SINGLE  FAMILY. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.  SO I HAVE THAT RIGHT. I KNOW  COATING REQUIREMENT IN SINGLE  PERSON OR EVENT STRICT STRICT.  DO I HAVE A SECOND. I'LL  SECOND RESPECT. LIKE TO SPEAK  TO GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR. I  THINK THAT. THIS BAR INC.  >> SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED  REASONS WHY SO YOU KNOW I FEEL  THAT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE TO  GO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE PROBLEM  IS WITH SO I JUST WANTED TO  COURTESY ALLOWING. EVERY  COMMISSIONER WHATEVER COMMENT  THEY MAY WANT TO MAKE  REGARDING THIS MATTER BUT I  THINK STAFF STOPPED THE RIGHT  IDEA HERE AND YOU KNOW FENCES  TO RUSH LIKE CRAZY THAT THEY  THERE INSTEAD NIGHTMARE AND SO  THE COATING DOES DO A GOOD  JOB. HELP. KEEP THEM LOOKING  GOOD.  >> ARE ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU  FOR THAT COMMISSIONER AND MUCH  DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING. TO ADD  TO THIS.  >> NOT ONLY THING I HAVE TO  ADD TO IT AS I UNDERSTAND THE  REASONING WHY IS THE COST  FACTOR TO THE HOMEOWNER. AND  IT WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT  CHEAPER AND I CAN GET DOWN NOT  AS MODELS SO I'D BE IN FAVOR  FOR THIS.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WE HAVE THAT  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL SECONDED BY VICE  MAYOR IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  ON THAT FIRST MOTION I WILL  CALL FOR A VOTE THAT WE HAVE  AND WITH THAT.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR KNOW.  MAYORS LANGDON NO. WE SHOULD  YES. AND COMMISSIONER EMRICH  COMMISSIONER I WAS A YES,  OKAY, AND THAT FAILS 2 TO 3.  THE NEXT ONE IS.  >> RELATING TO THE TREES IN  THE FRONT YARD AND USING  STAFF'S MEMO. AS A GUIDELINE  TO HAVE THIS MOTION WILL BE  FORMULATED I WILL MAKE A  MOTION TO EXEMPT SINGLE FAN.  I'M SORRY. TO EXEMPT EXISTING  HOMES PRIOR TO JULY FIRST 2027  WITH OR WITHOUT SEPTIC SYSTEMS  FROM CODE FOR 0.3 0.6.  >> C AND  >> COMMISSIONER REPEAT AFTER  THE CODE. 0.3.  >> 0.6. C.  >> AND D AND THAT CODE NUMBER  JUST FOR CLARITY IS REQUIRING  TREES AND SHRUBS ON A SINGLE  FAMILY LOT THAT STAFF SAID  THAT THAT IS NOT TO THEIR  INTENT. FOR EXISTING HOMES.  >> ALL RIGHT, HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  AND COMMISSIONER DOW JUST  WANTED TO. CLARIFY.  >> YOU JUST WANT TO CLARIFY  THIS IS NOT. DOES NOT INCLUDE  EXISTING HOMES. THAT'S REALLY  YOUR INTENT OF THIS MOTION TO  EXAMINE THAT.  >> EXISTING HOMES YET PRIOR TO  JULY FIRST 2027, WITH OR  WITHOUT SEPTIC SYSTEMS FROM  CODE FOR 0.3 0.6 C.  >> AND  >> OKAY BECAUSE THIS IS SLATED  TO BE EFFECTIVE ON JULY FIRST  2027 I UNDERSTAND THAT BUT  THERE IS A PROVISION IN THE  CODE IF IF SOMEBODY SECOND  THAT I WILL EXPLAIN ALL SET TO  GO AHEAD BY A THANK YOU VICE  CHAIR THAT COMMISSIONER DOWN  THERE'S A PROVISION IN THE  CODE.  >> THAT IT IS  >> EXEMPTING CERTAIN  REGULATIONS DUE TO STATE LAW  IN HURRICANE IAN.  >> THAT TAKES EFFECT AFTER  JULY 1ST OF 2027. THIS THAT  PHRASE IS USED THROUGHOUT THIS  CODE REWRITE FOR JULY FIRST  2027. AND THE REASON I DIDN'T  SAY EXISTING HOMES TODAY OR  WHEN THIS TAKES EFFECT IS  BECAUSE THERE IS THAT TWO-YEAR  ISH LED TIME. FOR ANY HOMES  THAT COME ON THAT GET CO. SO  THAT'S WHY I PICKED THAT DATE.  ANY  >> QUESTIONS DISCUSSION ABOUT  THAT WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL CITY  CLERK COULD BE READ THAT BACK.  >> MOTION WAS MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL SECONDED  BY VICE MAYOR STOKES TO EXEMPT  EXISTING HOMES PRIOR TO JULY  FIRST 2027 WITH OR WITHOUT  SEPTIC SYSTEMS FROM CODE  SECTION 3004.6 C AND D.  >> OKAY AND THAT WAS SECONDED  BY VICE MAYOR NOTHING ELSE WE  WILL DO A VOICE. VICE MAYOR OF  THERE'S A YES. LANGDON SAY  YES. MCDOWELL IS YES.  COMMISSIONER EMRICH EMRICK. I  MEAN ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES  5 TO 0 ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL NUMBER 3 I SHOCKED  FACE. THANK YOU.  >> THE SECOND MOTION IS TO  EXEMPT EXISTING HOMES. I'M  SORRY EXEMPT. HOLMES THAT  RECEIVED A C KNOW. AFTER JULY  FIRST 2027. THAT HAVE A SEPTIC  SYSTEM. FROM CODE 4 POINTS 3.6  C ANDY.  >> I WE HAVE A MOTION MADE  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL CITY  CLERK WHEN YOU'RE FINISHED  CLACKING AWAY THERE COULD BE  >> TAKES EMPTY HOMES THAT  RECEIVE A CO AFTER JULY FIRST  2027 THAT HAVE A SEPTIC SYSTEM  FROM CODE SECTION 3004.6 CMT.  >> I GET A SECOND ALL EXPLAIN  WHAT THAT CODE AND SELL SECOND  SET  >> THIS IS.  >> ANY HOMES BUILT AFTER JULY  FIRST THAT MAGIC DATE THAT'S  IN THIS CO GET TO THAT HAVE A  SEPTIC SYSTEM WOULD NOT TO BE  REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE  REQUIREMENTS OF PLANTING TREES  AND SHRUBS ON FRONT YARD OF  THEIR PROPERTY. THIS IS  SOMETHING THAT STAFF SAID  STAFF WILL NEVER REQUIRE  SOMEONE TO PLANT TREES OR  SHRUBS OVER SEPTIC FIELD  ANYWHERE THAT WOULD COMPROMISE  THAT SEPTIC FIELD. SO THAT'S  WHY THAT I PUT AFTER THAT DATE  BECAUSE THE FIRST MOTION  COVERED UP TO THAT DATE THIS  IS ONLY EXEMPTING THOSE THAT  HAVE SEPTIC SYSTEMS AFTER THAT  SHOULD THANK THANK YOU FOR THE  SECOND IN DISCUSSION.  COMMISSIONER LANGDON. YES,  THANK YOU.  >> AND IN MY OWN NEIGHBORHOOD  OF SEEN WAY TOO MANY EXAMPLES  OF TREES BEING REMOVED FROM  AREAS OF THE PROPERTY WHERE  THEY COULD HAVE BEEN  SUSTAINED. I HAVE A SEPTIC  SYSTEM.  >> AND I HAVE PLENTY ROOM, I'M  IN THE FRONT OF MY PROPERTY  AND ON THE SIDE OF MY PROPERTY  TO PUT TREES IF I WANTED TO  HAVE THEM THERE. I APPRECIATE  THE INTENTION BUT I'VE JUST  SEEN WAY TOO MUCH ABUSE EVEN  IN MY OWN NEIGHBORHOOD OF  PEOPLE REMOVING TREES THAT  REALLY COULD HAVE STAYED ON  THAT PROPERTY AND THOSE  PROPERTIES HAVE WELL AND  SEPTIC.  >> OK AND YOU KNOW, I'M GONNA  WEIGH IN ON THIS WOULD PRETTY  MUCH MEAN THIS IS USELESS  BECAUSE WE HAVE 45,000 LOTS IN  THIS CITY BETTER. AND SEPTIC  AND MOST OF THEM ON WELL,  WHICH IS 12,000 ACRES OF LAND  THAT WILL HAVE THE BIGGEST  IMPACT AND HAS HAD IMPACT OF  THE LOSS OF OUR TREE CANOPY  BECAUSE THERE WAS NOTHING  REQUIRING PEOPLE THAT HAVE  HAVE A TREE ANYWHERE ON THE  PROPERTY WHERE AS A  LARGE-SCALE DEVELOPMENTS HAVE  TO BUT TRAINS AND SHRUBS AND  THERE. AND HOW IT READS IT'S  ONE TREE. ONE TRAIT NEEDS TO  BE AND THAT FRONT YARD  CERTAINLY NOT ON THE DRAIN  FIELD AND THE DRAIN FIELD IS  NOT THE ENTIRE FRONT YARD. AND  THAT'S BEEN MADE CLEAR VERY A  LOT AND AGAIN AT THIS FOR  DECADES VERY LONG TIME. THERE  IS ROOM FOR A TREE, SOMEWHERE  AND THAT FRONT AND IF WE'RE  GOING TO BE MOMENTUM ABOUT THE  LOSS OF OUR TREE CANOPY  INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT WE  OUGHT TO TAKE OWNERSHIP. OF OF  THAT I CERTAINLY HAVE I TELL  PEOPLE ALL THE TIME I INVITE  YOU TO COME SEE MY HOUSE  BECAUSE ACTUALLY WE CAN'T SEE  MY HOUSE ALL AND I'VE BEEN  THERE FOR 33 YEARS. IT'S A LOT  OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE TREATED  FRONT YARD. AGAIN RIGHT TREE  RIGHT PLACE IS REALLY REALLY  IMPORTANT. OF COURSE, BUT WE  HAVE TO REALLY GOING TO BE  SERIOUS ABOUT THIS THIS IS  WHAT WE HAVE TO START DOING.  TO MAKE UP FOR THAT LOSS SO  THAT'S. THAT'S MY LOOK AT THE  WORD SEPTIC TANK THAT'S MY  TAKE ON THIS. COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING  THAT.  >> WE'RE SITTING HERE ARGUING  OVER ONE TREE. YEAH  HOMEOWNER'S FRONT YARD. WITH  THE CENTER FOR WORRIED ABOUT  IT RECOUNTS. LET THEM PUT IT  THAT TREE IN THE BACKYARD, LET  THEM PUT IT THE SIDE YARD. IF  THERE'S BOTH HAVE 3 OR 4 TREES  LET THEM PUT THEM ANYWHERE  THEY WANT TO PLUG THEM RATHER  THAN REGULATE THEM AND SAY  YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE THAT TREE  IN YOUR FRONT YARD. LET THEM  HAVE THAT OPTION. SO I'M IN  AGREEMENT OF THIS, I MEAN TREE  ROOTS RUN FOREVER, YOU'RE NOT  WATCHING WHAT'S GOING ON  UNDERNEATH THE GROUND FOR  YEARS AND AND YEARS AND IT  BECOMES A VERY EXPENSIVE  RETHINKS IF YOU'VE GOT TO  CHANGE YOURSELF TO GO BECAUSE  WE DON'T HAVE CITY WATER  AVAILABLE OUT THERE WHICH IS  MANY MANY YEARS OUT IN THE  PLAN SO YOU KNOW SEEN A LOT ON  FACEBOOK AND AND THIS IS JUST  ONE THING THAT'S I RING THE  CITIZENS OUT THERE SAYING.  H.O.A. PORT. I MEAN COME LET'S  LET'S. WE DIDN'T GIVE A LITTLE  BIT IT'S TREE PER PROPERTY  THAT CAN BE MOVED TO THE BACK  YARD. THAT'S WHY I LOOK AT IT  NOW SUPPORT THIS.  >> ANYTHING FURTHER.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WE HAD A A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL, SO WE NEED THAT  REPEATED OR DO WE KNOW WHAT  WE'RE VOTING ON. WE'RE OK GOT  IT AND VICE MAYOR SECONDED  THAT SO WE WILL DO A VOICE. BY  SPARE.  >> VICE MAYOR'S FO, YES, THIS  ONE. I THINK THAT THE. PLANT  THE TREES WHERE THEY WANT. I  THINK PEOPLE SHOULD WANT TO  PLANT TREES NOT TAKE THEM DOWN  SO I MEAN YES ALL RIGHT, I  MEAN NOW.  >> LANGDON NO.  >> MCDOWELL YES.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> I'M A YES.  >> ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 3  TO 2. ALL RIGHT. 2 MORE 2 MORE  TO GO IT SHOULD SAY. THIS  MOTION HAS TO DO WITH THE  RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMP PLAN  THAT I ALREADY READ THAT WAS  REMOVED FROM THE THAT WE SAW  IN NOVEMBER OF 22. SO I WILL  MAKE A MOTION TO INCLUDE  NUMBER I MEAN JUST FOR THE  RECORD I'VE GIVEN THE CITY  CLERK A COPY OF THE LANGUAGE.  OF THIS. MAKE A MOTION TO  INCLUDE NUMBER 4. AS PRESENTED  ON NOVEMBER 7TH 2022. IN 2  SECTION ONE 1.3. AND NUMBER  ACCORDINGLY. THE FOLLOWING AND  HE RUNS TO PRESCRIBE STANDARDS  BY THE LAND DEVELOPER OF THOSE  REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD  NOT BECOME A CHARGE.  >> THE CITIZENS.  >> AND TAXPAYERS OF ALREADY  EXISTING AREAS.  >> CITY CLERK TO HAVE THAT.  >> TO INCLUDE NUMBER 4 AS  PRESENTED ON NOVEMBER 7TH 2022  IN THE SECTION 1001.3 AND RE  NUMBER ACCORDINGLY THE  FOLLOWING AND HE RUNS TO  PRESCRIBE STANDARDS BY THE  LAND DEVELOPER OF THOSE  REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT SHOULD  NOT BECOME A CHARGE ON THE  CITIZENS AND TAXPAYERS OF  ALREADY EXISTING AREAS.  >> THAT WAS THE MOTION. A  SECOND. DISCUSSION VICE MAYOR  SECONDED YOU CAN DISCUSS AND  LISTEN MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS  CAN COULD BE A GOOD REASON WHY  THIS ISN'T A GOOD IDEA. YOU  KNOW, I'M SUPPORTIVE. SO  THANKS BOTH COMMISSIONERS  MIGHT HAVE SHOWN YEAH I'D LIKE  TO HEAR THAT RED AGAIN  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL WHAT  WHAT IS THAT.  >> IT SAYS IS FROM NOVEMBER  7TH 2022 YOU RIGHT WHEN WE HAD  OUR VERY FIRST WORKSHOP ON  CHAPTER ONE RIGHT THERE REALLY  WASN'T THAT MUCH DISCUSSION ON  CHAPTER WANT UNA OR ANYTHING  LIKE THAT. THIS WAS IN THAT  DRAFT LANGUAGE. SOMEHOW  SOMEWHERE ALONG THE WAY. I  NOTICED IT AT FIRST READING IT  MAY HAVE BEEN REMOVED I DON'T  KNOW AT THE WORKSHOP WHEN WE  HAD THE FIRST. MARY YOU KNOW  ALL THE CHAPTERS TOGETHER SO I  FORGOT TO MENTION THIS AT  FIRST READING SO THAT'S WHY  I'M BRINGING IT UP ITS SECOND  READING IT WAS IMPORTANT TO  HAVE IN THERE DURING THAT  CHAPTER ONE WORKSHOP.  >> AND IT'S CLEARLY SAYING WE  ARE THE DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD  NOT BE A COST TO EXISTING  TAXPAYERS THAT THEY HAVE TO  PAY KIND LIKE GROWTH PAY FOR  GROWTH. AND IT'S IN  RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMP PLAN  AND IT WAS IN THERE. IT'S NO  LONGER IN THEIR FIRST FIRST  AND SECOND READING SO THAT'S  WHY I'M ASKING TO HAVE IT PUT  BACK  >> TO DO IT'S  JUST EXPLAIN COST ARE YOU  REFERRING ANYTHING IMPROVEMENT  IT SAYS. PRESCRIBED STANDARDS  BY THE LAND DEVELOPER OF THOSE  REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD  NOT BECOME A CHARGE ON THE  CITIZENS AND TAXPAYERS OF  ALREADY EXISTING AREAS. SO  BASICALLY IT. AND AND I'M NOT  AN EXPERT IN INTERPRETATION. I  THINK IT KIND OF SPEAKS ITSELF  IF A DEVELOPER HAS TO MAKE  IMPROVEMENTS. TAXPAYERS ARE  PAYING FOR THEY ARE. THE  DEVELOPER US. AND AGAIN I  DON'T KNOW WHAT WAS REMOVED  STAFF FELT IT WAS NECESSARY TO  HAPPEN THERE.  >> OK I WOULD LIKE TO STAFF,  YES, THIS THING I THINK HAS A  LOT OF LEGS.  >> HIDDEN BEHIND A CURTAIN SO.  I MEAN PART PART OF HOW I  REACTED YEAH, IT'S YOU KNOW  GROWTH SHOULD PAY FOR GROWTH,  WE KNOW IT WAS. BUT. SOMETIMES  THERE ARE IMPROVEMENTS THAT A  DEVELOPER MIGHT MAKE THAT  REALLY BENEFIT AT. THE GENERAL  AREA, SO I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM  STAFF WHAT SOME THE UP AND  DOWN SIDE OF THAT CHANGE WOULD  MAKE. DO WE CHARGE PEOPLE NOW.  >> I'M LORI VAN SYSTEM  DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.  THE LANGUAGE REFERENCED FROM  NOVEMBER OF 2022. I CANNOT  SPEAK TO TONIGHT WHY THAT  LANGUAGE WAS REMOVED THAT MAY  HAVE BEEN PART OF THE LEGAL  REVIEW AND MAY HAVE PART OF  THE STAFF FOR YOU. I DIRECTOR  RAIN HIGH AFTER THE DEPARTURE  >> THE.  >> COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCLUDES  PROVISIONS THAT PROVIDE FOR.  DEVELOPER I'M INFRASTRUCTURE  IMPROVEMENTS. THAT'S COVERED  IN THE COMP PLAN LANGUAGE HERE  I THINK.  >> WE NEED TO ANALYZE FURTHER  IF IT'S GOING TO BE  INCORPORATED INTO THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.  PRESCRIBED.  >> STANDARDS.  >> FOR DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT  UP PAY OR SELL NOT BE BORNE BY  THE TAXPAYER IS  >> AND REALLY WHAT THE  LANGUAGE IN REFERENCE. WHAT  ABOUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN  SUBJECTS. IF THE CITY  COMMISSION WANTED TARGETED  INDUSTRY TO COMMENT TO THE BAY  AND WANTED TO PROVIDE ECONOMIC  DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES THROUGH  OUR ECONOMIC WOULD WE BE  BARRED FROM DOING THAT IF WE  INCORPORATED THAT LANGUAGE.  WELL THAT AND VALIDATE OUR.  ARE DRAFTS AMENDMENTS TO  CHAPTER THAT PROVIDE FOR  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT  INCENTIVES FOR TARGETED  INDUSTRIES. SO THERE ARE MANY  QUESTIONS SURROUNDING THIS  LANGUAGE THAT IS BEING  SUGGESTED FOR INCORPORATION  STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND IT BEING  REVIEWED OUR ALI PRIOR TO  INCORPORATING ANY SUCH  LANGUAGE THE AT THIS LATE DATE  WE HAVE NOW INDICATOR THAT  THIS WAS GOING TO BE A TOPIC  OF DISCUSSION TONIGHT.  >> I HAVE A FOLLOW-UP QUESTION  THAT THE MAYOR AND I THINK I  STILL HAVE THE FLOOR NOW  DEVELOPERS ARE REQUIRED WHEN  THEY DO A SUBDIVISION  RESIDENTIAL OVER CERTAIN SIZE  TO PUT IN WATER AND SOLAR.  THEY'RE REQUIRED TO DO THAT.  THAT INVESTMENT IS ON BY THE  PURCHASE PERSON WHO PURCHASES.  AROUND SO WHAT HAPPENS THEN.  >> WHAT'S IMPLICATION. I MEAN  THAT'S GENERAL STANDARD  OPERATING PROCEDURE EVERYWHERE  SO WHAT HAPPENS TO THEM IF WE  HAVE THIS LANGUAGE IN OUR  ULDC.  >> I THAT'S THAT'S A GOOD I  THINK IT COULD CAUSE SOME  CONCERN NOW OF COURSE THE CITY  DOESN'T INVOLVED IN PRIVATE  TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN  DEVELOPERS AND AND HOME  PURCHASERS FOR HOME BUYERS. I  GUESS EVENTUALLY BE  SO AGAIN WAIT IF THAT KIND OF  LANGUAGE IS GOING TO BE  INCORPORATED GENERAL  PROVISIONS WHEN WE FEEL IT  SHOULD BE. REVIEWED BY STAFF  THE PROS CONS AND THEN ALSO  AND PUT FROM THE CITY  ATTORNEYS OFFICE OUTSIDE  COUNSEL ON INCORPORATING THAT  TYPE OF WE FEEL AS ORDER.  >> I WOULD AGREE MAKE AN  AMENDMENT. REVIEW. I'M I'M NOT  IN THE FOR AN AMENDMENT.  >> SO.  >> WE CAN CERTAINLY GET THERE.  THERE ARE A LOT OF MOVING  PARTS TO THIS ULDC. AND IT  CLEANS UP A LOT OF THINGS AND  PUTS IN A LOT OF REQUIREMENTS,  PARTICULARLY FOR COMMERCIAL  DEVELOPMENT THAT WE  DESPERATELY NEED TO HAVE. TO  DELAY AND I WOULD NOT DELAY  TONIGHT'S VOTE. TO RESEARCH  THAT ADDITION, BUT I WOULD PUT  IT AT THE TOP OF THE LIST.  I'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS BUT  STAFF THINGS CHANGE OVER TIME  THE ULDC WILL BE A LIVING  DOCUMENT. LET'S PUT THIS ON  THE TOP OF THE LIST OF THINGS  TO BE DEBUT AFTER THE DUST  SETTLES. I THINK THERE ARE  TOO. MANY POTENTIAL AND VERSE.  UNANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES OF  THIS THAT WE REALLY NEED TO  RESEARCH AND DISCUSS. BUT  TONIGHT NOT PREPARED TO DO  THAT SO LET'S PUT IT ON THE  TOP OF THE LIST. THINGS TO  REVIEW AFTER THE DUST SETTLES.  I I KNEW VICE MAYOR JOHN A.  >> YEAH I AND I REALLY DO  APPRECIATE THE CONVERSATION  BECAUSE. PORCH. THIS WILL  MISTER ROBSON. GENUINE  CONCERNS, NOT TO SAY THAT THIS  SOMETHING THAT CAN BE WORKED  THROUGH IN TIME, BUT BUT I  DON'T DISAGREE THINK THERE  NEEDS TO BE SOME DILIGENCE ON  THIS ISSUE BEFORE WE WERE TO  ADOPT THIS ITS MOTION SO SO  MORE INCLINED TO YOU KNOW.  MOVE FORWARD AND THEN AS  COMMISSIONER LANGDON  RECOMMENDS WE WE PICKED THIS  UP IS SOMETHING WE HAVE STAFF  LOOK INTO IN OUR LEGAL STAFF  LOOK INTO IT DETERMINE WHETHER  THIS MAKES SENSE AND WHAT  POTENTIAL PITFALLS THERE MIGHT  BE OUT THERE. WE WERE WITHOUT  THIS KIND OF LANGUAGE SO YEAH.  I APPRECIATE THAT GUY LIKE A  REALLY GOOD COACH.  >> OK THROUGH WHEN ASKED THE  COMMISSIONER AND WHAT SHOULD  YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD ON  THIS.  >> YEAH, I'M PRETTY MUCH STILL  AND YOU KNOW AGREEMENT I WOULD  LIKE TO HAVE. YOU KNOW LEGAL  AND STAFF LOOK INTO IT MAY  EVEN EARLIER IN THE EVENING  AND THEY TALKED ABOUT BRINGING  BACK. MANY AMENDMENTS, YOU  KNOW, AND THIS COULD BE ONE OF  THOSE AMENDMENTS THAT COULD BE  BROUGHT BACK. ADDED AS LONG AS  LEGALLY FEASIBLE AND NOT  DETRIMENTAL.  >> OK THANK AND I'M IN  AGREEMENT WITH THAT TOO.  >> JUST SO PEOPLE KNOW THIS IS  AS COMMISSIONER LANGDON SAID  THIS IS A FLUID DOCUMENT ITS  BUT THIS IS NOT WRITTEN IN  STONE I MEAN IT THINGS CHANGE  WE HAVE CHANGED PARTS OF THE  CODE THROUGHOUT THE YEARS SO  SOMETHING LIKE THIS I THINK  ITS OWN CONVERSATION AND NOT.  >> RIGHT RIGHT HERE AT AT MAKE  A DECISION HERE ON I WANT TO  CALL FOR THE VOTE TO MAKE AN  AMENDMENT THERE. I CAN MAKE  MEANT THAT. I WOULD LIKE TO  MAKE AN AMENDMENT.  >> 2 AND HAVE THE CITY  ATTORNEY WORK WITH STAFF TO  REVIEW AND WEIGH THE MERITS OF  THE LANGUAGE. THE PROS AND  CONS AND VERBIAGE AND REPORT  BACK TO COMMISSION. THE A MEMO  WITHIN A COUPLE OF WEEKS.  THAT'S RIGHT.  >> THANK YOU DIRECTOR  DEVELOPMENT I HAVE CONCERNS  WITH THE STAFF WILL HAVE TO DO  SOME RESEARCH ON THIS AND  DEVELOP MEMO AND THEN WE WILL  HAVE TO SEND IT TO THE CITY  ATTORNEY'S OFFICE INTENSITY  ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TIMELINE FOR  REVIEWS LEAST 30 DAYS ON JUST  ABOUT ANY ISSUE. IT'S IT'S  GOING TO TAKE MORE WEEKS. IT  WILL IT WILL TAKE US LONGER  THAN THAT JUST TO RESEARCH.  AND COME UP.  >> WE DOESN'T TAKE EFFECT  UNTIL OCTOBER 28TH OF 2024,  THERE'S PLENTY OF TIME TO  REVIEW IT RESEARCH IT.  >> OKAY THAT'S YOUR LOOKING  FOR A COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  THAT'S NOT TECHNICALLY AN  AMENDMENT TO YOUR MOTION  THAT'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT YOUR  AMENDMENT AS YOU'RE ADDING  SOMETHING OR TAKING AWAY YOUR  MOTION. ALL RIGHT THANKS FOR  CLARIFYING A WHOLE NOTHER  OKAY, I'M OKAY SO YEAH, THE  FLOOR LET'S LET'S VOTE ON THE  ORIGINAL ONE AND THEN YOU  COULD YOU COULD DO AS A  SEPARATE WANT TO DO THAT SO.  >> DO WE NEED RIGHT BACK AND  WE'LL CAT WE KNOW VOTING ON  YOU WANT READ IT INTO KNOW OR  NO DOES TO INCLUDE NUMBER 4 AS  PRESENTED ON NOVEMBER, 7 2022  AND A SECTION ONE 1.3 AND RE  NUMBER ACCORDINGLY THE  FOLLOWING LANGUAGE AND HE RUNS  TO PRESCRIBE STANDARDS BY A  LAND DEVELOPER OF THOSE  REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT SHOULD  NOT BECOME A CHARGE ON THE  CITIZENS AND TAXPAYERS OF  ALREADY EXISTING AREAS.  >> ALL RIGHT SO YES AS YOU  AGREE WITH THAT YOU DON'T.  TURNER'S THERE IS A NO LANGDON  SAID NO DO YES. COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE. OKAY, SO THAT FAILS  ONE TO 4 COMMISSIONER DO HAVE  A ANOTHER MOTION I DO THAT.  THIS IS THE BIG ONE YET. THIS  ONE I ATTEMPTED BEFORE.  >> THIS ONE IS BEEN THE  BIGGEST CONVERSATION AND THE  REASON WHY I HAVE BEEN SO  OUTSPOKEN ABOUT THIS ULDC  REWRITE REZONE THE A STATE  STATUTE IS THE MINIMUM AND YES  STEPH FOLLOWED THE MINIMUM  REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED BY STATE  STATUTE. THERE IS A NUMBER 9.  IN THAT SAME STATE STATUTE.  THAT CLEARLY SETS. THIS IS THE  MINIMAL. THE COMMISSION AND  DIRECT. FOR ANYTHING ABOVE AND  BEYOND WHAT STATE STATUTE  REQUIRES. SO I WILL MAKE A  MOTION. TO REQUIRE THE CITY  MANAGER TO WORK WITH THE CITY  CLERK AND THE CITY MANAGER TO  NOTIFY EACH PROPERTY OWNER.  SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL  ZONING. IS BEING CHANGED TO  OUR 2. OUR 3.  >> CT.  >> C O R.  >> A C.  >> THE.  >> I OR I'M TOO. NOTICE SHALL  BE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL. USING  THE PROPERTY TAX ROLLS. FOR  THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS.  AND THIS IS TO BE COMPLETED.  BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE. OF  THIS ORDINANCE.  COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL. I MEAN YOU JUST  REPEAT CHANGE TO OUR 2 OR 3.  THE WHO SINGLE-FAMILY  RESIDENTIAL ZONING IS BEING  CHANGED TO OUR 2. OUR 3.  >> CT. C O R.  >> A SCENE. THE.  >> ONE. OR.  >> I TOO. NOTICE SHALL BE BY  FIRST-CLASS MAIL. USING THE  TAX ROLLS FOR THE PROPERTY  OWNER'S ADDRESS. THIS IS TO BE  COMPLETED. BEFORE THE  EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS  ORDINANCE.  >> THAT TO DIRECT THE CITY  MANAGER TO WORK WITH THE CITY  CLERK TO NOTIFY EACH PROPERTY  OWNER WHO SINGLE-FAMILY  RESIDENTIAL ZONING IS BEING  CHANGED TO OUR TO OUR 3 C  TEENSY OR A C BEING I WANT OUR  EYE TO BE A FIRST CLASS MAIL  USING THE PROPERTY TAX ROLL  FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER'S  ADDRESS TO PRIOR TO THE  EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE  ORDINANCE.  >> I DO I HAVE A SECOND ON  THAT DIFFERENT DISCUSSION.  VICE MAYOR SO WHAT I'D LIKE TO  UNDERSTAND AND MAYBE STAFF CAN  CAN SHED LIGHT ON IT IF WE  WERE TO SUPPORT THIS. AND  >> MY UNDERSTANDING IF IF WE  WE DO APPROVES SECOND READING  HERE THAT THIS NOTICE WOULD GO  WELL BEFORE THE EFFECT THAT  THEY JUST WENT UP TOLD WERE  OVER 20 RIGHT UP TO OVER 28.  AT LEAST THAT WOULD PUT  EVERYONE ON NOTICE THAT AS  OCTOBER 28. THIS ULDC CHANGE  CONSENT WITH THIS IN ANY WAY  TO WAIT THE ULDC PROCESS.  >> THE ADOPTION OF THE ULDC IF  THAT OCCURS AND THE EFFECTIVE  WHAT OCTOBER 28. STAFF OR  REQUIRE TOO. PROVIDE THAT  NOTICE BETWEEN NOW AND THE  EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE  ORDINANCE.  >> IT WOULD BE.  >> A SERIOUS CHALLENGE AND MAY  NOT BE ACCOMPLISHED ALL BY  ABOUT 8 BETWEEN NOW AND THE  EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE CODE.  STAFF NEEDS TO AS YOU AND  COMMUNITY EDUCATE THE  CONSULTANTS EDUCATE THE  CONTRACTORS. TOGETHER INTERIM  PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES FOR  OUR NEW APPLICATION TIGHT THAT  WILL.  CODE BETWEEN AND  IMPLEMENTATION OF US UP AND  THAT INCLUDES PREPARING ALL  THE TIME BUT DOCUMENTS OR.  RESOLUTIONS FOR EXAMPLE UNDER  THE CODE FOR. I DON'T PLATT'S  AND 4. THAT'S FOR CONCEPT  PLANS. STAFF IS STRETCHED AND  TO BEGIN WE'RE STILL SHORT  PLANNERS ON THE DEPARTMENT OUR  ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF. MANY OF  THEM ARE TO THE CITY AND JUST  LEARNING THE CITY. I'M NOT  WITHSTANDING THE COST TO  NOTIFY THESE PROPERTY OWNERS  WHICH WE CAN EVEN ESTIMATE  WITH OUT. DOING THOROUGH  ANALYSIS OF WHICH PROPERTIES  OR. CHANGED FROM SINGLE-FAMILY  TO SOMETHING ELSE ON THE NEW  DRAFT MAP AND I DON'T BELIEVE  THAT WE HAVE. THAT ASIDE ANY  FUNDING FOR THAT KIND PATIENT.  >> DO NOT HAVE FUNDING. I WILL  SAY THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE  WOULD STILL BE THE EFFECTIVE  DAY. OCTOBER 28 WOULD STILL BE  THE EFFECTIVE DAY I DON'T  BELIEVE THAT WE WOULD HAVE THE  RESOURCES BETWEEN NOW AND THEN  TO BE READY. THE ADDITIONALLY  I WILL LIKELY NEED TO MOVE  PEOPLE FROM. THE ACELA  IMPLEMENTATION. TO MANAGE  THIS. WHICH MEANS WE WOULD  LIKELY DELAY SELL. SO WE  PROBABLY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO  GO LIVE ON A CELL IN DECEMBER.  FOR EVERY MONTH THAT I DO NOT  GO LIVE. ON ACELA IT WILL COST  BATTLED ADDITIONAL $100,000 TO  THE PROJECT. SO THAT FUNDING  WOULD HAVE TO BE IDENTIFIED IN  ADDITION TO THE FUNDING FOR  THIS EFFORT. WE HAVE TALKED.  ITS LATEST TODAY ABOUT AND  ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF  NOTIFICATION TO THESE PROPERTY  OWNERS. AND WE ARE PREPARED  DISCUSS THE METHODS THAT WE'VE  TALKED ABOUT SO FAR IN  ADDITIONAL METHODS FOR  NOTIFICATION TO PROPERTY  OWNERS. BUT TO DO IT BY  OCTOBER 28 IS A SERIOUS. I DO  SEE A PATH FOR IT TO BE DONE  WITHOUT. NEGATIVELY IMPACTING  OUR GO LIVE FOR US ELLA. THE  BUDGET FOR LAW WHICH WOULD  NEED TO BE MODIFIED AS WELL  BEING ABLE TO GET ALL OF OUR  FORMS AND ALL OF OUR PROCESSES  AND OUR TRAINING DONE NOT JUST  FOR OUR INTERNAL STAFF, BUT WE  HAVE TRAINING SET THAT WE'RE  ABOUT TO A SHOP FOR OUR  CONTRACTORS ARE BUILDERS. ALL  OF THOSE SO THAT THEY CAN  BECOME FAMILIAR WITH NOT ONLY  THE ONLY SEE BUT SELL AS WELL  WE'RE GOING PLANNING TO GO LOT  GO WITH THE TRAINING PROGRAM  FOR SELLING FOR OUR OUTSIDE  USERS NEXT MONTH, SO OKAY.  >> I GOT THE AND I APPRECIATE  THAT I DO APPRECIATE THAT THE  OCTOBER DATE IT'S NOT  REALISTIC AND CONSIDERING THE  FACT THAT.  >> WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD I  WOULD ASSUME AND VOTE ON THIS  ULDC SECOND READING TONIGHT  AND. IT GOES INTO EFFECT IF  IT'S VOTED ON FOR ME TO FLEE  ON THE 28TH OF OCTOBER  REGARDLESS THERE GOING TO BE.  OTHER HOMEOWNER'S PROPERTY  OWNERS WHERE. THERE'S REALLY  GOING TO BE NO IMPACT TO THE  ADOPTION. THIS ORDINANCE AND  THIS ULDC REWRITE SO PERHAPS  THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF  PUSHING THAT DATE OUT EVEN  FURTHER EVEN INTO NEXT YEAR IF  NEED BE THE IDEA BEING THAT  OVER A REASONABLE PERIOD OF  TIME OR PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD  BE AWARE THAT THIS REWRITE  TAKING PLACE AS YOU SAID ARE A  NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO DON'T  LIVE IN THE AREA.  >> A NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE  CITY WERE JUST PREOCCUPIED  WITH WITHIN THEIR LIVES  RAISING THEIR FAMILIES AND AND  THIS IS ON THE RADAR AND AS  FOR THE COSTS. YOU KNOW WHAT  IF IT COSTS THE CITIZENS OF  THE CITY A QUARTER MILLION  DOLLARS OR MORE IT SOUNDS LIKE  THEY'RE WILLING TO SPEND THEIR  TAX DOLLARS TO BE NOTIFIED  ABOUT THIS. I WOULDN'T HAVE A  PROBLEM WITH IT. I JUST FEEL  THAT WE NEED TO BE FLEXIBLE IF  THERE'S ALTERNATIVE  METHODOLOGY OF NOTIFICATION  YEARS FOR THAT TO MY BIG  CONCERN IS THAT THIS IS MANY  MANY MANY MANY YEARS IN  PROCESS FOR ANYBODY TO SAY  REWRITE ITS BEING RUSHED  THROUGH THE PROCESS IS ABSURD  AND IT IS BEEN SOMETHING THAT  HAS BEEN THE LABEL FOR AN  EXTENSIVE  ♪ PERIOD OF TIME I DO NOT WANT  TO SEE THAT DELAY. BUT I DO  APPRECIATE THE NEED FOR  PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE AWARE  EVEN IF THEY HAVEN'T FOR  WHATEVER REASON BECOME AWARE  SO YOU KNOW.  >> I'M INTERESTED IT'S IT'S  CERTAINLY IT'S IT'S CERTAINLY  SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO WHERE  WE'RE CERTAINLY OUR POST  TONIGHT. I THINK WE SAID ALL  ALONG THAT IF THE COMMISSION  DRUG TESTING SOME MEDICATION  WE ABSOLUTELY WOULD. IT'S THE  TIMELINE I DON'T HAVE ANY ANY  ISSUES WITH SOME. IF THE  COMMISSION WOULD LIKE SOME  OPTIONS ON HOW WE DO  NOTIFICATION AND WHAT THOSE  TIMELINES WOULD BE WE'D BE  MORE THAN HAPPY TO PUT THAT  TOGETHER FOR YOU. I I WOULD  LIKE TO SAY THAT AS FAR YOU  KNOW WHAT WE HAVE DONE. WE  HAVE GONE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE  MINIMUM EDUCATIONS BUT JUST  WANT TO MAKE IT. CLEAR THAT  WE'RE MORE THAN MORE THAN ABLE  AND HAPPY TO DO THAT THE  NOTIFICATION IT'S JUST A  MATTER OF. OCTOBER 28, THIS  ISN'T A PROBLEM JUST  >> AND I'M I WANT TO COMMENT  ON THAT DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM  WITH THE NOTIFICATIONS BUT  WITH THE DATE BUT A DAY LIKE  ON THERE. SO I DON'T KNOW.  COMMISSIONER ME. IN A BOWL  AMENDMENT THERE, BUT IT'S JUST  THE DATA. AGAIN I KNOW THE  TIMELINES I THINK THAT IN  THERE THAT'S A LOT OF PRESSURE  AND. SOMETIMES YOU DON'T END  UP WITH WITH A QUALITY PRODUCT  WHEN YOU'RE LIKE THAT TO DO  THINGS SO THAT'S GOING TO BE  PROBLEM WITH IS THE DAY. WE  WANT TO DO.  >> LIED AND SAID HE'S GOING  YES GO AHEAD CAN TAKE MY LIFE  OKAY, ALRIGHT. COMMISSIONER  DOUBT, YEAH, I'M SORRY.  >> I HEARD THAT THEY THAT  STAFF NEEDS TO EDUCATE THE  BUSINESSES AND TRADES AND  CONTRACTORS ABOUT THIS ULDC.  >> I'M SORRY THAT SHOULD HAVE  ALREADY BEEN DONE THEY SHOULD  HAVE BEEN STAKEHOLDERS IN THIS  WHOLE PROCESS. I UNDERSTAND  THAT THERE'S A COST INVOLVED.  >> THIS IS A COST OF DOING  BUSINESS. WE HAD NO PROBLEM  WITH THE COST INVOLVED WHEN WE  HAVE CONTRACTORS THAT HAVE TO  DO THIS FOR THEIR REZONING.  WHAT I HEARD THAT JUST BLOWS  MY MIND. CORRECT ME I HEARD IT  INCORRECTLY. THAT YOU DON'T  EVEN KNOW WHICH PROPERTIES ARE  BEING REZONED YOU DON'T HAVE  THOSE PROPERTY ID NUMBERS  LISTED SOMEWHERE.  >> WE HAVE EVERY PARCEL ID  IT'S A MATTER OF SCRUBBING  THAT LIST TO ACCOUNT FOR.  >> SINGLE FAMILY. BUT YOU SAID  WE'RE GOING TO CERTAIN  DISTRICTS. WE HAVE AN ENTIRE  PARCEL LISTED ALL OF ONES THAT  ARE BEING CHANGED. BUT WE HAVE  TO GO THROUGH INSCRIBED THAT  LIST SO WE ARE PULLING OUT.  RESIDENTIAL PARCEL PUT INTO  THIS ZONE IN RESIDENTIAL  PARCELS PUT INTO THIS OUT. I  THOUGHT WOULD BE NOT JUST TO  SAY. THE ONLY CHANGED FIRST,  HERE'S A WEB SITE BUT ACTUALLY  HAVE SOMETHING TO EACH OF  THOSE DIFFERENT ZONING  DISTRICTS THAT SAYS YOUR  PROPERTY HAS BEEN DOWN TO  THIS. SO THAT IT'S NOT JUST A  BLANKET STATEMENT, BUT WHAT  WE'RE SENDING THEM SAYING YOUR  INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY HAS BEEN  ZONE TO A CERTAIN DISTANCE  WELL DON'T YOU HAVE TO SEND  THAT NOTIFICATION TO THE  PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE OR  THE TAX COLLECTOR 128 KNOW  THAT YOU HAVE TO DO PROBABLY  BY JANUARY FIRST BECAUSE  THAT'S WHEN THEY DO THE  REASSESSMENT OF THE TAX ROLLS  OCTOBER 28 IS.  >> MUCH SOONER THAN JANUARY  1ST. OKAY 2 MONTHS I BROUGHT  UP THIS SUBJECT UP IN MARCH.  WHEN I ASKED TO HAVE THE  NOTIFICATIONS DONE MARCH ALL  RIGHT THIS WITH G OBVIOUSLY OR  SO IT'S ARGUMENT I'M NOT BEING  ARGUMENTATIVE I AM SPEAKING  FACT AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE HOW  I'M SAYING IT I'VE GOT NOTHING  FOR YOU THIS IS FACT.  >> ARE DO HAVE A MOTION SECOND  AND WE DID DISCUSS THAT I'D  LIKE TO CALL FOR THE VOTE. DO  WE HAVE TO HAVE THAT RED BACK  TO DOING NOW. WHAT IS WE'VE  GOT SOME GOOD SO THAT HAVE THE  VOTE VICE MAYOR. VICE MAYOR  NO. MAYER IS UNKNOWN LONDON'S  UNO PICKED YES COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE. ALL RIGHT SO THAT ONE  TO 4.  ♪ >> CAN HANDS ARE YOU LOOK AT  THE YELLING AT US BASE. THAT'S  JUST NOT KIND  ♪ YES, I'M VOTING.  >> PUBLIC HEARING NOT LOOKING  FOR I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A  MOTION  >> STAFF TOO.  >> LOOK AT THAT.  >> FOR NOTIFICATION OF  PROPERTY ON US WITH REGARD TO  THIS ULDC REWRITE. TIMELY A  FASHION AS POSSIBLE.  >> I WOULD SECOND THAT. CITY  CLERK THAT THAT. I HEAR THAT.  >> TO DIRECT STAFF TO REVIEW  OPTIONS FOR NOTIFICATION TO  PROPERTY OWNERS REGARDING THE  ULDC ME RIGHT IN A TIMELY  MANNER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,  OKAY OPTIONS GOT IT. I MISSED  THAT. THAT MADE BY VICE MAYOR  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON IF THERE IS I COULD  COMMISSIONER DOW AND IS THAT  PUTTING IT ON THE WEBSITE.  WHAT WHAT. WHAT OPTIONS ARE  GOING TO COME BY AND THERE'S  THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK TO  COMMISSION ARE THEY GOING JUST  EXPLORE OPTIONS AND JUST DO  WHAT THEY FEEL IS BEST GOING  TO BRING BACK TO OKAY PART OF  ARE YOU AND BRING BACK  COMMISSION. THANK YOU  CLARIFYING THAT ALL RIGHT.  >> WE MADE A VOTE ON THAT ONE  AND THE ONLY THING I'D LIKE TO  ADD TO THAT IS. WE'RE AT  SECOND READING. IF THE  NOTIFICATIONS WENT OUT I HAVE  TO FIRST READING OR EVEN PRIOR  TO TEASE THAT REASON PRIOR TO  FIRST SECOND READING. I'M SURE  CHAMBERS WOULD BE MUCH MORE.  SO EFFECTIVE IS OCTOBER 28.  AND THE REASON I PUT OCTOBER  28 SO THAT PEOPLE WOULD KNOW  THAT THIS IS TAKING EFFECT ON  THIS DATE IN THEIR PROPERTIES  BEING RE ZONE.  >> NOTIFYING THE PEOPLE  SOMETIME NEXT YEAR. IT IS  DEFINITELY PUTTING THE CART  AFTER THE HORSE. I WILL  SUPPORT THIS SO THAT OUR  CITIZENS GETTING NOTIFIED AND  THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED  AT LEAST 6 MONTHS AGO.  >> OK, I'M GOING OFF A VOTE ON  THAT MADE BY VICE PIER AND  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON VOICE VOTE VICE MAYOR.  >> MAYER'S  >> I MEAN, YES SAY YES, DO  YES.  >> COMMISSIONER EMRICH.  >> A CASE THAT PASSES 5 TO 0.  I THINK WE STILL NEED VOTE ON  ACTUAL COMMEND MINUTES,  ANYBODY WANT TO DO A  >> I MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 13.  >> WITH THE.  >> MOTIONS PAST. EFFECTIVE  DATE OF OCTOBER 2020 24.  >> OKAY. PART THAT HAVE ADOPT  THE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  13 AS AMENDED BY THE PRIOR  MOTIONS WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE  OF OCTOBER 28TH 2024.  >> ALL RIGHT SO THAT WAS MADE  BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR STEPS  RIGHT. LIKE DEJA VU. YOU'RE  WHATEVER. ALL RIGHT IF THERE'S  NOTHING LET'S DO A VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR S  THERE'S A YES LANGDON SAY  DOLLARS AND NO. COMMISSIONER  >> YES.  >> OKAY, SO THAT PASSES 4 TO  OR 2, 1, 4, EYE TOOTH THE TIME  I GOT I HAD I SEE AND I STAYED  THERE LIKE TO SPEAK TO MY  REASON FOR DISSENSION YES, GO  AHEAD. I HAVE 10 REASONS WHY  DISSENTED I HAVE PLENTY MORE  ABOUT I HAVE PLENTY MORE  REASONS. A LOT MORE THAN 10.  THESE ARE MY TOP 10. THE  CITIZENS ARE NOT BEING  NOTIFIED THAT THEIR PROPERTIES  BEING RESOLVED PRIOR TO THIS  ADOPTION. THIS IS WRONG. THIS  IS EGREGIOUS AND IT JUST  CREATES MORE DISTRUST BETWEEN  GOVERNMENT AND OUR CITIZENS.  THERE ARE MANY UNSUSPECTING  VACANT PROPERTIES THAT WILL  NOT BE PERMITTED TO BUILD A  HOME ON THEIR PROPERTY, THIS  CREATES A HARDSHIP FOR THOSE  EXISTING AND FUTURE PROPERTY  OWNERS AND THIS IS NOT AN  IMAGE I WANT FOR MY CITY NOW  OR EVEN IN THE FUTURE.  DEVELOPMENTS WILL NO LONGER BE  APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION OR  WITH THE INPUT OF THE CITIZENS  DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE APPROVED  ADMINISTRATIVELY BY STAFF  WHICH NOW REMOVES THOSE CHECKS  AND BALANCES REGARDLESS IF  THEY WERE A 100% ACCORDING TO  CODE. THE PROPOSED LAND USE  FOR ACTIVITY CENTER 70. THE 68  SURROUNDING THE WARM MINERAL  SPRINGS. IT HIGH DENSITY HIGH  INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT.  GENERALLY VARIANCES AND  MODIFICATIONS TO THE CODE WILL  NOT BE APPROVED BY THE  COMMISSION BUT BY ZONING  HEARING OFFICER OR  ADMINISTRATIVELY BY STAFF.  IT'S ALSO REMOVES NEIGHBORHOOD  AND CITIZEN INPUT. THERE ARE  TOO MANY INSTANCES WHERE THE  INTENT OF THE CODE DOES NOT TO  MATCH THE WRITTEN WORDS WITHIN  THE CODE. THIS CREATES  UNCERTAINTY AND LACKS CLARITY.  DECISION SHOULD BE MADE WITH  ACTUAL DATA AND EVIDENCE THE  DECISION TO REZONE THOUSANDS  OF PROPERTIES WAS DRIVEN  WITHOUT ANY DATA. STATISTICS  YET WE WILL BE DESTROYING  EXISTING PROPERTIES AND  NEIGHBORHOODS. HAVE THESE AND  OTHER REVENUES COLLECTED WILL  NEVER BE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE  THE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS  NECESSARY FOR THE CITYWIDE  REZONING AND THESE EXISTING  NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE IS NO  REFERENCING THE PROPERTY  IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS BEING  REZONED. WE RECENTLY MANY  PARCELS TO ACCOMMODATE  RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH  0 2 VERY LITTLE COMMERCIAL  DEVELOPMENT ON THOSE PARCELS  WHICH DEFEATS THE WHOLE  PURPOSE OF THE CITYWIDE  REZONING. I'VE SAID MY PIECE  THIS MATTER IS VOTED ON THIS  MATTER IS CLOSED. SO I WILL  USE ALL PHRASE MCDOWELL PUT A  SOCK IN IT. TERM SEE WITH HIM  ARE WRESTLING HERE. I THANK  WHAT IS THE WILL OF BOARD DO  WANT TO MOVE IT TO BREAK  BREAK. OKAY, IT'S 10 MINUTES.  OKAY, SO WE'LL COME BACK AT  >> HAVE FUN WITH IT MAKING  YOUR OWN IT'S NOT SCARY. IT  DOESN'T HAVE TO BE  INTIMIDATING AT ALL YOU'RE  USING YOUR BODY WEIGHT USING  THE ANGLES THAT YOU CHOOSE TO  USE ON THE MAN'S AND IT JUST  VARIES WITH HOW YOU'RE  COMFORTABLE AND HOW YOU'RE  FEELING WHEN YOU'RE HERE.  >> STARTED CHARLOTTE COUNTY  UTILITIES AS A METER READER IN  2004. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHERE  I GOT MY FOOT IN THE DOOR AND  WANT REACH A POINT MY LIFE OR  THINGS ARE MORE STABLE AND I  DECIDED TO LEAVE CHARLOTTE  COUNTY UTILITIES. AND I WENT  AND GOT MY INTERNS LICENSE  THOSE VERY EXCITING DOING THAT  FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME,  BUT AFTER A WHILE I STARTED  THINKING ABOUT THE UTILITY. IT  WAS IN MY HEART AT THIS POINT  I HAD ALMOST 12 JUST 2 MONTHS,  SHY OF 12 YEARS AND AND SO I  REALIZED DURING THAT TIME. MY  HEART WAS IN UTILITIES AND SO  I STARTED LOOKING AROUND AGAIN  I THINK OPENING HERE TO BE  SEEING IN THE TECH SO I  APPLIED AND I GOT IN TYPICALLY  I GET HERE AT 7 IN THE  MORNING. I GET MY LIST YOU  KNOW IF I CAN GET TO THIS THIS  IS WHAT I NEED TO DO AND.  >> I GET IN MY TRUCK IF I NEED  ANY SUPPLIES PARTS TOOLS BASED  OFF OF THE WORK I WAS GIVEN  THAT MORNING, I'LL PICK THAT  UP HERE AT OUR SHOP AND THEN I  HEAD OUT IN THEM. MICHAEL FOR  THE DAYS TO GET AS MUCH WORK  AS THAT WAS ASSIGNED TO DONE  AS POSSIBLE. AND SOMETIMES  THAT HAPPENS AND OTHER TIMES  THERE'S A LOT OF FIRST  RESPONSE CALLS THAT COME IN MY  FAVORITE PART IS THE  UNIQUENESS NOT KNOWING WHAT  I'M GOING TO BE FACED WITH  EVERY DAY IT COULD BE  DIFFERENT. IT'S NOT MUNDANE  ANYWAY.  >> AND IT'S EXCITING WHEN YOU  GET A CALL AND YOU'RE YOU'RE  ON YOUR WAY YOU DON'T KNOW  WHAT IT IS AND YOU YOU HAVE  THE EXPERIENCE AND THE  KNOW-HOW AND THE BACKING TO  FACE WHATEVER IT'S GOING TO BE  SO I FEEL VERY CONFIDENT IN  FACING THESE CALLS AND I THINK  THAT'S PART.  >> HI I MALAYNIA THIS IS  ANSWERS WITH ELENA AND I'M  GOING TO ANSWER ALL OF YOUR  FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.  ♪ TOO MANY PEOPLE HERE WHY  HASN'T THE CITY STOPPED PEOPLE  AND BUSINESSES FROM BUILDING  IN NORTH PORT THE SHORT ANSWER  IS WE CAN'T IF SOMEONE IS HAS  AND THEY COMPLY WITH THE  ZONING AND THE CONFERENCE OF  PLAN  ♪ STATE LAW MANDATES THAT WE  ALLOW THEM TO BUILD. FLORIDA  IS A VERY INTENSIVE PROPERTY  RIGHTS STATE SO WHAT WE CAN DO  IS MAKE SURE THAT THEY COMPLY  WITH ORDINANCES. PORT WAS  ALWAYS EXPECTED TO GROW FROM  ITS INCEPTION WITH ALL OF THE  LOTS LAID-OUT AND SOLD OFF TO  INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS.  NORTH PORT WAS EXPECTED TO  HAVE A POPULATION AROUND  270,000 PEOPLE WITH ULDC THAT  WE'RE CURRENTLY WRITING WE  PROJECT THAT THAT NUMBER WILL  FALL ABOUT 250,000 PEOPLE AS  LONG AS SOMEONE IS COMPLYING  WITH OUR CODES THEY ARE  ALLOWED TO BUILD. BUT WE WANT  TO ENSURE BUT THAT BUILDING  THAT THEY DO WILL BE  BENEFICIAL TO THE CITY AND ITS  RESIDENTS. HI I MALAYNIA THIS  IS ANSWERS WITH ELENA AND I'M  GOING TO ANSWER ALL OF YOUR  FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.  WHY ISN'T THE CITY WORKING TO  BRING IN NEW AND INTERESTING  BUSINESSES WE ARE. MOST LARGER  BUSINESSES ARE LOOKING FOR A  CERTAIN DENSITY FOR POPULATION  AND MEDIAN  ♪ HOUSEHOLD INCOME. NORTH PORT  IS ON THE CUSP OF HITTING BOTH  OF  ♪ THOSE TARGETS. MANY COMPANIES  WANT TO SEE A MEDIAN INCOME OF  $75,000 PER HOUSEHOLD NORTH  PORT JUST HIT 78,000  ADDITIONALLY MANY COMPANIES  WANT TO ENSURE THERE IS LEAST  A 100,000 PEOPLE WITHIN A  SPECIFIC RADIUS OF WHERE  THEY'RE LOOKING TO LOCATE.  NORTH PORT. IT'S JUST UNDER  100,000 AT APPROXIMATELY  93,000 AS OF 2024. SO WE ARE  VERY CLOSE TO  ADDITIONALLY NORTH PORT HAS AN  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION  THAT IS RECRUITING AND TALKING  WITH BUSINESSES EVERY SINGLE  DAY FOR SMALL BUSINESSES NORTH  PORT LOVES ITS MOM AND POPS WE  HAVE A LOT OF RESTAURANTS THAT  START OUT AS FOOD TRUCKS AND  MANY INTERESTING STORES THAT  STARTED IN SOMEONE'S GARAGE OR  ON THEIR DINING ROOM TABLE WE  ARE VERY BUSINESS FRIENDLY.  AND WE WANT TO HELP OUR SMALL  BUSINESSES GROW AND THRIVE WE  HAVE A TEAM DEDICATED TO  ENSURING OUR BUSINESSES IN  PORT HAVE THE RESOURCES THEY  NEED IN ORDER TO HAVE A LONG  AND PRODUCTIVE FUTURE IN OUR  CITY. HI I MALAYNIA THIS IS  ANSWERS WITH ELENA AND I'M  GOING TO ANSWER ALL OF YOUR  FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.  CAN A BUSINESS BE BUILT RIGHT  NEXT DOOR TO MY HOME. IT'S A  PENCE ONE OF THE BIGGEST  FACTORS IS HOW MUCH LAND DOES  THAT PROPERTY OWNER, HALF IN  ORDER FOR SOMEONE TO PUT NEW  DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY THEY  HAVE TO HAVE ENOUGH LAND FOR  PARKING BUFFERS STORM WATER  TREE CONSERVATION AND ALL OF  THE OTHER THINGS THAT GO INTO  BUILDING A NEW FACILITY THAT'S  GOING TO MEAN THAT SOMEONE IS  NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO COME  IN AND PUT A NEW BUSINESS ON A  QUARTER ACRE LOT RIGHT NEXT TO  YOUR HOME THEY'RE GOING TO  HAVE TO HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY  MORE LAND THAN THAT BUSINESSES  ALSO TYPICALLY LIKE TO HAVE  FRONTAGE ON A MAIN ROAD SO ANY  BUSINESS THAT COMES IN IT'S  GOING TO BE LOOKING FOR THAT  ACCESS. THAT MAY MEAN THAT  THEY HAVE TO BUY NUMEROUS LOTS  IN ORDER TO HAVE ENOUGH LAND  TO DEVELOP AND TO GET THE  ACCESS ON THE MAIN ROADS THAT  THEY WANT THE ULDC REWRITE  THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY DRAFTING  HAS PROTECTIONS FOR CURRENT  RESIDENTS. SO THAT IF A  BUSINESS DOES LOCATE NEAR YOUR  HOME. WE WILL HAVE ADEQUATE  BUFFERS AND PROTECTIONS TO  ENSURE THAT YOU CAN STILL  ENJOY YOUR QUALITY OF LIFE.  >> DECIDED TO BECOME A  FIREFIGHTER USED TO WORK  HOSPITALITY AND GROUP SALES  AND I ALWAYS HAD FRIENDS THAT  WORK. FIREFIGHTERS AND I  DECIDED ONE DAY THAT I WANTED  MY JOB AND PEOPLE SO.  >> I WENT AHEAD UT AND  PARAMEDIC PROGRAM WITH THE  FIRE ACADEMY. SAW NORTH WE'RE  HIRING AND REALLY LIKED WHAT  THEY HAD ON THEIR BETWEEN  THEIR ISO RATING BELIEFS AND  VALUES AND EVERYTHING 5, THEY  GAVE ME AN OPPORTUNITY EVERY  DAY IS DIFFERENT BUT FOR THE  MOST PART WE START OFF THE  SAME.  ♪ WHAT WAS GET OUR YEAR ONTO  THE. BRAD US MAKE SURE  EVERYTHING'S OPERATIONAL AND  OUR  ♪ AIR BACK. ALSO CHECKED  INVENTORY. MAKE SURE WE HAVE  ALL OUR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT.  EVERYTHING'S THAT WAY YOU CAN  RESPOND TO ANY EMERGENCY SO  WE'RE ALWAYS STOCKED AND READY  TO I THINK THE BEST PART IS  THAT EVERYONE'S PASSION ABOUT  THEIR JOB.  >> SO THEY COME TO WORK AND  THEY'RE READY TO TRAIN AND  TAKE CARE OF EACH OTHER AND  TEACH EACH OTHER SO EVERYONE  SHARPENED ON THEIR A GAME SO  IT MAKES IT OFTEN AND I JUST  LOOK FORWARD TO COME TO WORK.  >> ALWAYS GET VERY EXCITED  WHEN ANYBODY ASKS ME ABOUT MY  JOB IN WHERE I WORK AND WHAT I  DO IT'S NOT A SECRET THAT I  LOVE WORKING FOR THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT I WORKED FOR  CHARLOTTE COUNTY AND I FELT  THAT I NEEDED TO DO SOMETHING  DIFFERENT AND I WANTED  SOMETHING MORE AND I WANT  OFFER MY SKILLS TO TELL MY  FRIEND DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO  AND I WAS THINKING ABOUT MY  NEXT STEPS AND SHE SAID DID  YOU THINK ABOUT APPLYING TO  JOBS. THE CITY OF NORTH PORT  THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT VIBE  HERE AND SHE SAID LOVE IT AND  I SAID I COULD THINK ABOUT  THAT SO I APPLIED AND I  STARTED MY FIRST POSITION IN A  PLANNING AND ZONING IN OUR  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  DEPARTMENT I'M PARTNERED WITH  THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.  >> BECAUSE MY MIND THE FEES  ARE ASSESSED OFF OF BUILDING  PERMITS AND IT'S STRICTLY FOR  NEW CONSTRUCTION, NEW  DEVELOPMENT. AND THE FIRST  THING I DO IS TO CHECK THE  SPREADSHEET TO LOOK AT THE  PERMITS AND DETERMINED WHICH  ONES NEED ME TO ESTIMATE THEIR  IMPACT FEES AND THAT'S START  WITH THAT THEN I GO TO NUMBERS  THAT I HAVE TO PUT TOGETHER  AND I PUT TOGETHER INVOICES  FOR DEVELOPERS OFTEN TIMES GET  PHONE CALL TO GET VOTES BEFORE  THE DEVELOPMENT COMES THROUGH  AND SO DEVELOPERS WANT TO KNOW  HOW MUCH THEY CAN.  >> BUDGET FOR SOMETIMES I PUT  PROPOSED ESTIMATE TO HELP THEM  LIKE THAT.  ♪ ♪ THE BULK OF IT IS IT'S MAKING  SURE THAT THE FEES ARE IN THE  SYSTEM FAST AS POSSIBLE I LOVE  THE ESPRIT DE CORPS THAT  EXPERIENCE. JUST HOW EVERYBODY  TEAMWORK TOGETHER ENJOY  KNOWING THAT I CAN MAKE A  DIFFERENCE FOR THE CITY AND  THAT MY POSITION CAN HAVE A  POSITIVE IMPACT FOR OUR CITY.  ♪ ALWAYS INTERESTED IN PORT.  >> HERE TODAY, WITH MARY OF  AND ANY PLAYER SCHEDULE FOR  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT SOLID  WASTE DIVISION WE'RE GOING TO  TALK ABOUT PICKUPS TODAY. I  HAD A SCHEDULED VOTE PICKUPS  WHAT SHOULD GO OUT AND WHAT  SHOULD NOT GO OUT TO THE  CURRENT WHERE TO PLACE THE  ITEM TO THEM WHAT HAPPENS IF  YOU HAVE MORE THAN WHAT A LOT  OF CHIEF OF THE YEAR PICK UP.  SO I KNOW WE CALL 9, 4, 1, 2,  4, 0, 8, 0, 50 TALK TO OUR  CUSTOMER SERVICE REPS HAD A  SCHEDULED VOTE PICKUP HOW ELSE  CAN WE DO THAT.  >> CAN ALSO GO ON A  WEBSITE NORTH PORT FL DOT  CLICK ON SOLID WASTE AND FILL  OUT A BULK REQUEST FOR  EXCELLENT EXCELLENT SCENARIO  WHEN IN DOUBT.  >> IF A PERSON WANTS PLAY SET  OUT WHAT SHOULD TAKE PLACE  OUT.  >> WHAT'S RIGHT THING WAS THE  WRONG THING BASICALLY FRANK  ANYTHING THAT DIDN'T 51 AND  CURRENTLY CHARGED COMMISSIONER  ELRICH ARE YOU THERE.  >> YES, MA'AM OKAY.  >> I WAS JUST LOOKING AT  EVERYTHING WE'VE GOT LEFT.  ♪ ♪ >> THAT SOUNDS LIKE YOU OKAY  WE'RE MOVING ITEM D.  >> WAS NUMBER 2020 FORECAST,  14 CITY CLERK, AND YOU READ  THIS BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 14 AN  ORDINANCE OF THE CITY IN NORTH  PORT FLORIDA REPEALING CHAPTER  29 AND THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO  SIGN REGULATIONS AND CREATING  NEW CHAPTER 5 PROVIDING  FINDINGS PROVIDING COMPLEX  PROVIDING SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> I THANK YOU. CITY MANAGER  THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR OUT  ITEM IS WE'RE GOING TO HAVE  YOU KNOW ABOUT IT MY WAY IN  DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO  SIGNED RELATING CREATING A NEW  CHAPTER FOR SIGNS. ORDINANCE  FOR SECOND READING PROVIDE FOR  THE REMOVAL OF SIGNS. BOTH  GREAT FROM. I IT ALSO SUMMER.  THAT AFTER THE CITY COMMISSION  APPROVED ORDINANCE NUMBER DASH  4 TEAM ON THE SECOND THANK  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK LET'S GET  MYSELF SETTLED HERE  >> I MOVE ING OUT TO  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS AND  DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> YES, MAYOR I DID NOT  MENTION THAT STARTING FIRST  BEING BECAUSE THERE WAS A LOT  OF OTHER DISCUSSION CODE AND I  DIDN'T WANT TO GET IF YOU GO  TO SECTION C ON PAGE 10.  >> IT SAYS ABOUT CONSTRUCTED  WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING  CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS  AND STATES D OBSCENE OR  INDECENT IN DESIGN DISPLAY  STATEMENT CHARACTER  ILLUSTRATION.  >> I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHO  DETERMINES WHAT OBSCENE AND  WHAT IS IN DECENT AND WHAT IS  THAT. MECHANISM TO MAKE THAT  DETERMINATION.  >> CAN. I LARRY ON THE TOWN.  >> ALL RIGHT JON AND DIRECTOR  ACTUALLY THIS TO COME OFF  FIRST READING. AND OUR OUTSIDE  COUNSEL.  >> HAS REVIEWED THE USE OF THE  WORD AND THIS ACTION UP CODE.  SHE HAS INDICATED THAT IT IS  THAT THE COMMISSION'S  DISCRETION AS TO WHETHER THEY  RETAIN THE LANGUAGE OR REMOVED  THE LANGUAGE AS FAR AS  ENFORCEMENT OF ANY OBSCENITY  AND SIGNAGE IT JUST FALLS TO  THE SUPREME COURT'S DEFINITION  UP CD WHICH IS VERY STRICT.  BASICALLY IT'S TO BE THE  OFFENSIVE. YOU KNOW WE'VE  TALKED ABOUT THE POLITICAL  SIGNS WITH THE FACTS AND HAVE  AND IN A NAME THAT DOES NOT  RISE TO THE LEVEL OF OBSCENE.  NOW IF WE HAD A. SIGNED WITH  SEXUAL CONTACT. WE RECEIVED A  COMPLAINT TO PALM. WE WOULD  IMMEDIATELY GO TO OUR COUNCIL  AND FOLLOW WITH THEM AS TO A  DETERMINATION OF WHETHER THE  SIGNAGE ROSE TO THE LEVEL ALL  SANITY AND OR THE SUPREME  COURT DECISIONS BEFORE WE AND  THAT BEFORE WE ACTED ON ANY  ENFORCEMENT.  >> MARRIAGE IS FIRMLY BELIEVE  WE SHOULD JUST TAKE IT OUT OF  THE CODE. THERE'S NO REASON TO  HAVE IT IN THERE.  >> COMMISSIONER CAN THOUGH  WHERE IT IS AGAIN.  >> THE MEMBERS LETTER ACTUALLY  LINE FOR 10 OF THE FIRST  READING DOCUMENT PREGNANT AND  SECTION.  >> OR STRAWS 5 ONE WON.  >> C 6.  >> OKAY DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER  DISCUSSION PAGE 10 PAGE JEN  THANK YOU.  >> FOR THAT WE HAVE ANY OTHER.  DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT. I WOULD  JUST MAKE A AND THE GUARDRAILS  ARE PRETTY LOOSE ON THIS ONE.  BUT IF WE DON'T HAVE IT IN  THERE. AND WE HAVE NO RECOURSE  I MEAN ARE OUR OPTIONS ARE  LIMITED WHEN IT COMES TO THIS  BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT HAS  WEIGHED  >> I WOULD BE MORE COMFORTABLE  HAVING THE LANGUAGE AND GIVING  US THE OPPORTUNITY. TO ADDRESS  AN EGREGIOUS ISSUE. BUT I  AGREE THAT THE SUPREME COURT  WILL MAKE IT VERY DIFFICULT.  2. AND FOR US AND THE THING  THIS AREA. I HAVE A QUESTION.  FOR CLARITY THIS IS IN AND  SECTION.  >> SAY WHEN 3.92. AND THAT  GOES DOWN 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,  MINE THAT RIGHT SECTION AS YOU  ARE YES CONTINUE DOWN TO DO  YOU KNOW THOSE.  >> ARE NOT JUST APPLICABLE TO.  >> THE WIND 3.93 THAT SAYS.  AVERAGE HIGHS. THOSE PRODUCTS  OR SERVICES OFFERED OR CARRY  ON AT THE PREMISES WHERE THE  SITE IS LOCATED. PROVIDED THE  SIGNS ARE AND THEN IT HAS.  >> THOSE. STIPULATIONS THERE  SO DOES NOT JUST APPLY TO WHAT  IS.  >> MENTIONED AND SEE. REQUIRE  ANSWERS AT ANY SIGN DIDN'T  READ THAT IS ANY SIGN  ANYWHERE. CITY ATTORNEY.  INTERPRETING THAT CORRECTLY.  >> AND THEN I WOULD DEFER TO  YOUR PLANNING STAFF AS THEY  WORK DIRECTLY WITH SPECIAL  COUNSEL HOLE AND AFTER SIGNS  ARE AND THEN IT LISTS  EVERYTHING I THOUGHT IT WAS  JUST TENDING TO.  >> THE PARAGRAPH THAT IS  THAT'S AT 3.93.  >> MADAM MAYOR KNOW IT APPLIES  TO ANY SIGN THAT IS VISIBLE  FROM PUBLIC RIGHT OF OKAY.  ACTUALLY A SEPARATE OKAY ALL  THE CODE PROVISIONS REGARDING  SIGNAGE IT SIGNS THAT VISIBLE  ON THE PUBLIC OKAY.  >> THAT WAS LET'S START WITH  THAT CONTENT THAT I THOUGHT  THAT THAT JUST THAT'S TALKING  ABOUT HER SENTENCE, BUT IT'S  NOT OK AND AND I AGREE I WOULD  JUST REFER TO WHAT THE SPRING  PARTIES ARE READY.  >> DECIDED ON AND I I KNOW  THAT VERY WELL BEING A CHILD  OF THE 60'S AND 70'S YOEST  ABOUT THE FIRST THAT HAS TO BE  TO STICK 2 CONDITIONS MET FOR  SOMETHING TO BE CONSIDERED  OBSCENE. I'M NOT GOING TO  ARGUE WITH THE SUPREME COURT.  THAT'S MY TAKE ON THAT.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE YOU  HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD BEFORE WE  GO 2 MAYBE A SECOND ROUND.  COMMISSIONER DOUBT.  >> I JUST FEEL THAT NEEDS TO  BE REMOVED BECAUSE BY HAVING  IT IN THERE ANYBODY CAN READ  IT AND THEN SAY HEY THIS IS  OBSCENE AND THEN WE HAVE TO GO  THROUGH EVERYTHING AND GO  THROUGH ALL JUMP THROUGH THOSE  HOOPS AND STUFF. I'M JUST BY  HAVING IT REMOVED THIS ENTIRE  CODE IS PROTECTING FREEDOM OF  SPEECH THAT'S THE WHOLE  PURPOSE OF THE COVERT GREAT  THING. AND I THINK THAT IT'S  STEPPING AN AREA THAT WE  REALLY SHOULDN'T BE STEPPING  IN AND STAFF IS ALREADY SAID  THAT SPECIAL COUNSEL SAID THAT  IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP IT IN OR  TAKE IT OUT. THERE'S NO HARM.  NO FOUL. I'M HEARING NO HARM.  NO FOUL BY TAKING IT OUT. I  THINK KIDS. IT IS GIVING. THE  TEETH THAT IS NECESSARY IN THE  REST OF THE COLD NOT JUST THIS  ONE SENTENCE BECAUSE OBSCENE  AND INDECENT IS ONLY MENTIONED  ONCE IN THE CODE AND THAT'S  GREAT HERE. AND I WOULD HATE  TO HAVE. ANY STAFFER.  >> GO MY GOSH THAT IS OBSCENE  THAT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED AND  REMOVE THE SIGN. HELLO  LAWSUIT. AND THAT'S NOT  SOMETHING WANT TO SUBJECT THE  CITY TOO.  >> AND ITS STAFF CONCURS I  REALLY WISH THAT THEY WOULD  COME UP GIVE A RECOMMENDATION  TO THIS COMMISSION TO REMOVE  IT OR TO LEAVE IT IN I KNOW  IT'S AT OUR DISCRETION. I SAY  TAKE IT OUT.  >> LATER A DIRECTOR OF  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF HAS  NO OBJECTION TO TAKING OUT.  >> WE WE UNDERSTAND THE.  >> FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUES OUR  LEGAL COUNSEL.  >> IS HAS SAID THAT IT IS IT  IS A POLICY DECISION BUT I  THINK THAT THEY WOULD HAVE NO  OBJECTIONS TO US TAKING IT OUT  AS WELL.  >> I HAVE QUESTION IF I'M A  YES, NO STAFF.  >> THERE ANY DOWNSIDES TO ARE  TAKING IT OUT AND AND AGAIN MY  MY SENSE WAS THAT WOULD NOT BE  UP TO THE ARBITRARY DISCRETION  OF A STAFF MEMBER TO DEFINE  SAME, WE WOULD NEED TO THE  FALL TO THE SUPREME COURT.  WELL BUT IS THERE ANY  POTENTIAL DOWNSIDE TO REMOVING  IT.  >> THE LANGUAGE TO SEND A  MESSAGE WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL  UNDERSTANDS THE DIFFERENCE  BETWEEN.  >> COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD  OBSCENITY BY COMMUNITY MEMBERS  VERSUS THE SUPREME COURT.  DEFINITION OF SCENE IS THE  QUESTION OF NOT.  >> OUR CODE ENFORCEMENT STAFF.  IT HAS HAS IT THAT IF  THERE ARE.  >> THESE.  >> PROFANITIES.  >> FINANCE THAT THEY COMMENT  THEY ARE VERY WELL INFORMED.  >> WE WILL CONTINUE TO ENSURE  THAT THEY ARE WELL INFORMED.  AND IF THERE WERE A SIGN THAT.  ROSE ABOUT THAT LEVEL. I HAVE  NO DOUBT THAT A CODE VIOLATION  NOTICE WOULD NOT BE WRITTEN  AND TELL DIRECTOR RAY. OR ARE  NEW ASSISTANT DIRECTOR. WERE  CONSULTED. DEFINITELY FIRST  AND 14TH AMENDMENT. WITH  SIGNAGE AND AS MATTER OF FACT  OUR OUTSIDE COUNSEL NOT A  RECOMMENDATION ONE WAY OR  ANOTHER, I'M HER ONLY  COMMENTARY WAS IF WE WORKED  REALLY IT, I'VE SEEN. THAT  PARTICULAR PROVISION THAT WE  NOT TO FIND AND WE NOT ATTEMPT  TO ADMINISTER.  APPLICATION OF OBSCENITY  LOCALLY.  >> AND WHAT HAVE THERE. YEAH.  ♪ ♪ >> IF THE CONVERSATION IS  THERE'S NO PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT  ON  >> MAKE A MOTION TO REMOVE  ITEM FROM SECTION 5 0.1 0.1.  >> SCENE. SINKS. D.  >> REMOVING THE SENTENCE IN  ITS ENTIRETY OBSCENE OR  INDECENT DESIGN DISPLAY.  STATEMENT CHARACTER OR  ILLUSTRATION. YOU KNOW SECOND  IT.  >> I HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TO  REMOVE.  >> FENTON'S BOUND AND SECTIONS  GENERAL REQUIREMENT NUMBER 6.  >> THE WINDY.  >> DEALING WITH OBSCENE OR  INDECENT AND DESIGNED TO  STATEMENT CHARACTER  ILLUSTRATION AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR. VICE  MAYOR.  >> IT'S AMAZING. YES.  >> I WAS STARTING A LIKE  THAT'S NOT WHAT I THOUGHT YOU  WANT TO TALK ABOUT  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL N.  >> I NEAR THE YES MAYOR IS  YES. I'M YES, BUT I DON'T LIKE  IT.  >> THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS  REPORT DOES THAT WE DON'T  MCDOWELL'S A YES COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE.  >> I MEAN YES ALL RIGHT SO  THAT PASSES 5 TO 0.  >> ALL RIGHT AND I JUST HAVE  TO MAKE A COMMENT.  >> IT'S JUST A VERY SAD STATE  OF AFFAIRS THAT COMMUNITY  CANNOT SET LIMITS. IT IS A  VERY VERY SAD STATE OF AFFAIRS  SO THAT'S ALL I'M GOING TO  SAY.  >> YES YOU READ RE YOU I I  AGREE IDENTITY.  >> PEOPLE MY STUDENTS  SELF-CONTROL IT WOULD HAVE TO  HAVE TOO MANY RULES AND SO  THAT WAS A A MOTION TO TAKE  OUT THAT LINE CORRECT. RIGHT  SO WE STILL A MOTION TO ADOPT  THE ORDINANCE WITH THAT. NOW  OF GET THAT A CORRECT I  ALREADY TURNED MY PAGE THAT WE  HAVE ANY PUBLIC I MOVE TO  ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 14.  >> REMOVING THE REFERENCE TO  OBSCENE HAND ACTIONABLE WAS  THAT THE LANGUAGE. A LINE OF  TEXT REFERRING TO OBSCENE  CONTENT.  >> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 14 WITH THE AMENDMENT  THAT WAS MADE TO REMOVE LINE.  AND THAT SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER NOTHING ELSE WILL  DO A VOICE. VICE MAYOR.  >> IT IS YES.  >> THEY ARE THANK SAY, YES  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> OKAY SO THAT.  >> PASSES 5 TO 0.  >> LET'S MOVE ON TO ITEM E  ORLEANS 24 DASH 15. CITY JUST  BY TITLE ONLY.  >> IT'S NUMBER 2024 DASH 15 AN  ORDINANCE OF THE CITY IN NORTH  PORT FLORIDA RELATING TO THE  OFFICIAL ZONING MAP REPEALING  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2010 DASH 15  AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING  AMENDMENT ADOPTING A NEW  OFFICIAL ZONING MAP PURSUANT  TO CHAPTER ONE ARTICLE 2  SECTION 2001.3. THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> THANK YOU CITY CLERK CITY  MANAGER YOUR ITEM.  >> THIS SHOW. DON'T KNOW THE  CITY WHERE THIS I DON'T LIKE  WITH 6 WE ASK THAT YOU APPROVE  THE ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 24.  THAT'S 15% THANK.  >> MOVING ON TO COMMISSIONER  QUESTIONS.  >> I DON'T THINK IT'S SAYING  LITTLE BATTERY. I WANT TO GO  TO PLANT TOTALLY BUT.  >> ALL RIGHT DO I HAVE ANY.  >> COMMENTS. QUESTIONS ON  >> COMMISSIONER HEMORRHAGE DID  YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> WE HAVE THE PUBLIC COMMENT  ON  >> I'M SORRY IF TO MAYOR RAHM.  ♪ BUT NUMBER 2024 DASH 15 I  STRONGLY OPPOSE THE REZONING  FROM OF CHAMBERLAIN FROM  SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES I  UNDERSTAND THAT CHAMBERLAIN  HAS BEEN PLANNED AS A MAJOR  ROAD AND WILL BE EXPANDED AT  SOME POINT IN TIME.  >> TODAY A MULTI LANE ROAD  LATER I HAD MENTIONED THAT  THE NORTH PORT FORWARD MEANING  THAT SHE FELT PEOPLE WOULD NOT  WANT TO LIVE ON A MULTI-LANE  ROAD. SO IT WAS THAT'S TO  INCLUDE SMALL BUSINESSES  CHAMBERLAIN NOT JUST  SINGLE-FAMILY HOME BUILDING.  THERE ARE MANY HOMES CHAMBER  LAND AND THE REZONING WILL  INCREASE TRAFFIC TO WHERE IT  WILL BE A CHALLENGE FOR THOSE  OF US LIVING FOR CHAMBERLAIN  TO GET TO AND FROM THEIR  HOMES. I KNOW IMPORTANCE  INCREASE THE NUMBER OF  BUSINESSES TO HELP WITH THE  TAX BASE. BUT HAS STUDY BEEN  DONE TO SEE HOW MUCH  ADDITIONAL MONEY THE CITY  WOULD GET FROM BUSINESSES AND  CHAMBERLAIN AND DOESN'T  JUSTIFY THE LOSS OF ENJOYMENT  AND ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC BURDEN  THAT PEOPLE BOTH ON AND OFF  CHAMBERLAIN WELL CHEAP. DUE TO  THIS REZONING. JUST ABOUT  CONVERSATION AND DISCUSSION  WITHOUT BETWEEN THE ELECTED  AND THE ELECTORATE AT THESE  MEETINGS WILL BE THERE IN  PERSON BUT SINCE THAT IS  UNIQUELY PROHIBITED PORT CITY  HALL MEETINGS. THIS ONLINE  COMMENTARY WILL SUFFICE MY  FAMILY AND I AND ALL NEIGHBORS  OPPOSED TO THE REZONING SCHEME  FOR THE ENTIRE CITY, TURNING  BOULEVARDS IN THE CORRIDORS OF  HIGH-DENSITY DEVELOPMENT IZICK  SPECIALLY OUTRAGEOUS AND WILL  RUIN NOW QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD  AND THAT PROPERTY VALUES AND  HOMEOWNERS AS A 4TH GENERATION  FLORIDIAN I'M DISGUSTED BY THE  LACK OF RESPECT FOR THE PEOPLE  AND NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE  CITY THAT IS REGULATION BY THE  CITY GOVERNMENT HERE OF COURSE  ALL THE COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE  FOR THIS SHOULD BE VOTED OUT  THAT I'M BACK IN A LOT OF WILL  BE VOTING WITH FEET AS WELL.  AND PERSON I HAVE RON DESANTIS  ENGLISH. PEOPLE  >> GOOD EVENING AGAIN UP AND  SAID  >> I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF I  SHOULD EVEN SPEAK TO WHAT I  WAS GOING TO SPEAK THOMAS ON  MAPS AND PAST 8. ORDINANCE  2024 13, WHICH IS BASICALLY  REZONING OUR CITY. I FEEL I'M  WASTING MY BREATH. I MEAN I  TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THE CITY IS  GROWING. I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND  THE NEED FOR THE BALANCE OF  COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL.  HOWEVER, AGAIN YOU'RE GOING  INTO AREAS THAT YOU SHOULDN'T  BE GOING INTO A REZONING. AND  THAT IS ESPECIALLY IN  SPECIFICALLY THE CORRIDORS.  IT'S NOT NEED TO GO THAT THERE  WAS SO MUCH LAND WITHIN A  CITY. THAT CAN BE LEAVES ON  THAT YOU ARE REZONING WHO THE  ACTIVITY SENSE. IT'S A GREAT  TO KINDS OF WONDERFUL. YOU  DON'T NEED TO IMPEDE FURTHER  INTO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS  LIKE YOU DOING. I MEAN WHERE  WHERE DOES IT END DOES IT EVER  END. OR DOES IT JUST KEEP  CONTINUING TO WE JUST ARE  TOTALLY SPRAWLED OUT. AND A  CONCRETE JUNGLE. WITH JUST  MAYBE A LITTLE PERCENTAGE OF  GREEN SPACE. THAT'S MY CONCERN  AND I JUST KEEP GETTING UP  HERE AND. FEEL EVERYTHING'S  JUST GOING INTO LA LA LAND.  YOU'RE LOOKING AT ME LISTENING  TO ME BUT. IT DOESN'T MATTER.  AND THAT'S WHY YOU'VE GOT AN  EMPTY ROOM. BECAUSE THAT'S HOW  THE PEOPLE FEEL. NOTHING SAY  MATTERS.  >> SO I'VE GOT NOTHING ON THE  ZONE MATTER ANYMORE.  >> THANK YOU MISS ROBIN. OKAY,  CLOSING PUBLIC HEARING AND  LOOKING FOR MOTION.  >> MAKE A MOTION GO AHEAD AND  MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 DASH 15 AS PRESENTED.  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 15 AS PRESENTED AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR IF  THERE'S NOTHING ELSE VOTE.  VICE MAYOR. YES. THERE IS A  YES LINE DIDN'T SAY. YES AND  COMMISSIONER ELRICH. OKAY THAT  PASSES 4 TO 0 OR TO WANT THAT.  THANK YOU COMMISSIONER DOW.  >> THAT'S I HEAR THINK IRAN,  I'M LOOKING AT THE  >> JUST HAVE IN MY HEAD.  >> BEEN DOING THAT A LOT I  DON'T KNOW WHAT IT MOVING  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 6  TEENS CITY CLERK AND YOU'RE IN  THIS BY TITLE ONLY DISCOVER  2024 DASH 16 ORDINANCE OF THE  CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA,  AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY  AND FLORIDA SECTION 2.8 2.  >> PLUS ADDITIONAL MATTERS TO  RIDE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> AND TO CITY MANAGER THIS IS  YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU DECIDE ARE WE  NEED TO GO TO THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT FLORIDA  ACCEPTING 2.8 TO REQUIRE THAT  ADDITIONAL MATTERS WAS HEARD  FOR THE COMMISSION ON JULY  23RD CONTINUE TO THE SECOND  ORDINANCE READING WELL TODAY  THE 6. WE ASK THAT YOU APPROVE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 TO 16 AS  WE TO THAT THANK YOU.  >> THANK YOU LOOKING FOR  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS OR  COMMENTS ON THIS.  >> SEEING COMMISSIONER MUCH TO  DO ANYTHING. THANK YOU.  >> ANY PUBLIC COMMENT THERE  ISN'T ALL RIGHT SOME CLOSING  THIS PORTION OF THE PUBLIC  HEARING AND LOOKING FOR MOTION  THEY CAN GO AHEAD VICE MAYOR  MOVE TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2, 0,  2, 4 DASH 1, 6 S PERCENT  SECOND ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY VICE MAYOR STOW  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 20  20 FORD AT DASH 16 AS  PRESENTED AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  THAT'S TO A VOICE VOTE.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR MAYOR  ZS LANGDON YES.  >> ALLEN YES, AND COMMISSIONER  EMRICH TO LET THE DOGS OUT YES  TO.  >> IT'S QUOTE I LEFT MY GOD SO  I COULD VOTE AND THEY CAME TO  THE DOOR STARTED BARKING MY  THAT I YOU ABOUT. I'M GOING TO  VOTE. YES THERE'S OLD  >> ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5  TO 0 YOU KNOW YOU'RE OK MOVING  ON TO ITEM G ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 DASH 17. CITY CLERK TO BE  BY TITLE ONLY.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  17. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY AND  OUR PORT FLORIDA AMENDING THE  CODE OF THE CITY OF NORTH  FLORIDA SECTION 2 DASH 5, 1,  1, RELATED TO FINES FOR TREE  PROTECTION VIOLATIONS, WRITING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR  CODIFICATION AND PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE THANK YOU CITY  MANAGER THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR THIS  I KNOW IS AMENDING THE CODE OF  THE CITY OF 4TH QUARTER, THE  SECOND DASH 5 ONE WORLD. WAS  PROTECT IN VIOLATIONS. THIS  ITEM WAS DISCUSSED AT ITS  PEAK. AT YOUR REGULAR MEETING  WAY THERE. BORE ORDINANCE TO  TODAY FOR SECOND READING THE  6TH PLACE WITH 4. WE ASKED  CITY MISSION BORN IT'S BEEN  BETWEEN 4 TO 17 AS PRESENTED.  THANK  >> THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT  LOOKING FOR ANY COMMISSIONER  QUESTIONS. THIS ITEM. NOT  SAYING ANY. COMMISSIONER  EMERICH YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS  ON ONE.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> THAT WAS RON ITEM G ALL  RIGHT ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. ALL  RIGHT SOME CLOSING THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND HAVE A MOTION.  >> MAKE VICE MAYOR MOVE TO  ADOPT ORDINANCE 2024 17  ESTROGEN.  >> THAT WE HAVE A MOTION MADE  BY VICE MAYOR STOKES TO ADOPT  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 17  AS PRESENTED. THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON IF THERE'S NOTHING  FURTHER, LET'S DO A VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR S MAYOR THE  WELLINGTON YES MCDOWELL  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE. YES ALL  RIGHT THAT PASSES 5 TO 0.  MOVING ON TO ITEM H ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 18. CITY  CLERK COULD YOU READ THIS BY  TITLE ONLY.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  18 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA AMENDING  THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT FLORIDA TO UPDATE  REFERENCES FOR CONSISTENCY  WITH THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THEN  CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE 4 DIVISION  ONE PARENT OFFICERS AMENDING  CHAPTER 4 BOARDS AND  COMMITTEES TO ADDRESS  COMMISSION LIAISONS AND ART  ADVISORY BOARD MANY CHAPTER 22  ARTICLE TO FERTILIZERS AND  LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT MEANT  AFTER 59 SECTION 59 DASH ONE  PARKING AND STORAGE OF CERTAIN  VEHICLES ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS  RIGHT. THE FINDINGS RUN  COMPLEX PROVIDING SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> ALL RIGHT THANK THAT A  JUROR THIS YOUR ITEM.  >> THIS TIME IT WAS GOING THEM  THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT BIG PRESENCE IS FOR  CONSISTENCY WITH THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT THE CITY  COMMISSION FOR THE FIRST  READING OF THIS OR AT ITS  REGULAR MEETING JULY 23RD 2024  TO DOOR GETS A SECOND READING  ON AUG 6 TODAY AS. WE HAVE TO  THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 23 PORT AS A  TEAM TODAY IS PRESENT.  >> OK MOVING ON TO ANY  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.  YES GO AHEAD.  >> I HAVE NO QUESTIONS.  ♪ ♪ >> OKAY.  >> THANKS FOR SENDING ME THE  TROUBLE OF  ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. SOME  CLOTHING THIS PORTION OF THE  PUBLIC HEARING AND LOOKING FOR  MOTION AMERICA GO AHEAD AND  MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 DASH 18 AS PRESENTED.  >> SECOND. I HAD A MOTION MADE  BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON TO  ADOPT THE ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 DASH 18 AS PRESENTED AND  THAT WAS SECONDED BY VICE  MAYOR STOKES. WE WILL DO A  VOICE VOTE.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR C S.  >> THERE'S SLAMMED AND YES DO.  YES. YES, ALRIGHT, PASSES 5 TO  SARAH.  >> ALL RIGHT MOVING ON TO ITEM  I.  >> 24 DASH 2419. ANY PART  DURING THIS BY TITLE ONLY WAY.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  19 ORDINANCE OF THE FL  REPEALING ARTICLE ONE SECTION  26 1926 DASH 2026 DASH 22,  3.26 DASH 35 CHAPTER 26 OF THE  COVID THE CITY OF NORTH PORT  FLORIDA LATE INTO FIRE  PREVENTION AND PROTECTION AND  AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT FLORIDA SECTIONS  26 DASH ONE 26 DASH 2026 DASH  22 THROUGH 26 23 RELATING TO  FIRE SAFETY AND PREVENTION  PROVIDING DIRECTION FOR STATE  FIRE MARSHAL REVIEW, PROVIDING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY PROVIDING  CODIFICATION PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> THANK YOU CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THEY COME EVERY YEAR THIS  ORDINANCE IS WE BELITTLE  ARTICLE SECTIONS 26 TO 1926,  2026 RANGES 2 2635 PROTECT THE  26 THOSE OF THE CITY OF PORTE  CITY MISSION ARE THE FIRST  READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 20  REPORT THAT'S 19 REGULAR  MEETING ON JULY 23RD 2024  CONTINUE OR HAS BEEN SECOND  READING ON AUGUST 6 OF 2024.  CITY STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE  THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED  GOING IS DASH 19 AS PRESENTED.  THANK  >> THANK YOU TO WE HAVE ANY  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.  COMMISSIONER ELRICH.  >> ANY PUBLIC COMMENT.  IMPOSING THIS PUBLIC HEARING  AND WITH THE PROMOTION OF MAKE  VICE CHAIR I MOVE TO ADOPT  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 19  AS PRESENTED. ALL RIGHT, WE  HAVE A. VICE MAYOR TO ADOPT  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 19  AS PRESENTED AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL THERE'S NOTHING TO OF  OYSTER BOAT. VICE MAYOR VICE  MAYOR ZS THEY YES DO. YES.  ALRIGHT, THAT PASSES 5 0.  >> MOVING ON TO ITEM J  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 20.  CLERK HE WITNESSED BY TITLE  ONLY.  >> THE 2024 DASH 20 AND  ORDINANCE OF THE FL REPEALING  SECTION 34 DASH ONE OF THE  PART OF THE CITY OF NORTH PORT  FLORIDA RELATING TO MOBILE  FOOD VENDORS, PROVIDING FOR  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION  PROVIDING AN AFFECTED DATE.  >> THANK YOU.  >> ALRIGHT CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THIS ORTIZ REPEALING  SECTION 34 DASHBOARD OF GO TO  THE CITY OF PORT FLORIDA  RELATED TO MOBILE FOOD  VENDORS. ITEM. HER DURING  FIRST READING JUST WANT GET  YOUR REGULAR MEETING ON BOARD  INTO HAS PRESENTED ITS SECOND  READING ON AUGUST, THE 6TH OF  2024. WE HAVE THE CITY  COMMISSION APPROVED FOR OR 3,  4 DASH 20 AS PRESENT IT, THANK  >> THANK WE HAVE ANY  COMMISSIONER QUESTION.  COMMISSIONER EMRICH ANY  QUESTIONS ABOUT.  >> NO MA'AM OKAY. A PUBLIC  COMMENT ALL.  >> ALL RIGHT SOME POSING THIS  PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AND  LOOKING FOR A MOTION.  >> MAKE GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO  ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 20 AS PRESENTED.  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 20 AS PRESENTED AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR  STOKES IT WILL DO A VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR THIS MAYOR ZS  LANGDON YES. WELL, YES,  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE THANK  ASSETS 5 TO 0. MOVING ON TO  ITEM K 2024 DASH 21. A PARK  WITH THIS BY TITLE ONLY  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 21 IN  ORDINANCE TO THE CITY IN NORTH  PORT FLORIDA AMENDING THE CODE  OF THE CITY OF NORTH PORT  FLORIDA TO UPDATE REFERENCES  TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  DEPARTMENT IN CHAPTER 34  LICENSES PERMITS AND  MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS  REGULATIONS.  >> ARTICLE 2 BUSINESS TAX  RECEIPTS AND ARTICLE 4 ADULT  ORIENTED BUSINESSES. BUT FOR  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  CODIFICATION AND PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE DATE. ALRIGHT CITY  MANAGER THIS YOUR ITEM.  >> THEY COME HERE I DON'T THIS  THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT FLORIDA UPDATE REFERENCES  TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY OR. THE  COMMISSION THIS I DO AT ITS  REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 23RD  REPORT CONTINUED ORDINANCE AS  WRITTEN IN THE SECOND READING  ON AUGUST 6 WHICH 4. YES, THE  THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2020 FOR THAT  FOR ONE HAS PRESENTED. THANK  YOU. THANK YOU.  >> AND THE COMMISSION THIS  COMMISSIONER EMRICH OK THANK  YOU.  >> YOU KNOW, I'M GOING TO ASK  EVERY SINGLE TIME ANY PUBLIC  ALL RIGHT SOME POSING THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND LOOKING FOR A MOTION MAKE  IT GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR MOVE  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  21 PERCENT THAT KIND AND THE  MOTION MADE BY VICE MAYOR  STOKES TO A DOT. ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 21 AS  PRESENTED AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON WILL DO A VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR.  >> VICE MAYOR S MAYOR ZS  LANGDON YES YES. I'M A YES  ALRIGHT, THAT PASSES 5 TO 0.  >> MOVING ON TO ITEM ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 22 CITY CLERK  TAKEAWAY BURDENS NUMBER 2024  DASH 22 AND ORDINANCE OF THE  CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  RELATING TO SOLID WASTE  AMENDING THE CODE OF  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL  CHAPTER 62 SOLID WASTE ARTICLE  SPRING COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL  TO CLARIFY DEFINITIONS AND  UPDATE REFERENCES PROVIDING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  CONFLICTS SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AFFECTED DATE. THANK  YOU CITY MANAGER ITEM.  >> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR OF  THIS ORDINANCE HAS BEEN MADE  JUST ALL THE WAYS IN MANY OF  THE CODE OF THE CITY YOU KNOW  BEFORE THAT 62. THE COMMITTEE  HEARD THE READING OF THIS I  DON'T ITS REGULAR MEETING ON  JULY 23RD 2020 EITHER  ORDINANCE THAT'S IT. SECOND  READING ON AUGUST 6 TODAY THAT  YOU IS THAT WE TO REPORT AS 20  TO BECAUSE THANK YOU.  >> THANK YOU LOOKING FOR  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS ON  THIS.  >> OKAY  >> ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. ALL  RIGHT SOME CLOTHING THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND LOOKING FOR A MOTION. WELL  A KIT AHEAD, VICE MAYOR MOVE  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 22 AS PRESIDENT I CAN. I  WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY VICE  MAYOR TO IMPROVE TO ADOPT  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2020 DASH 22  AS PRESENTED AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL. WE WILL DO A VOICE  VOTE.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR MAYOR  ZS LANGDON YES DO YES. I'M  RICH ALRIGHT ASSETS 5 TO SEE  WRAPPED. SHOULD PAY ON ITEM  ORDINANCE.  >> NUMBER 2020 BOARD ASKED 23  CITY CLERK.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  23. AND ORDINANCE OF THE FL  RELATING TO THE NORTH PORT  ROAD AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND  THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ROAD  THING MANY OF THE COVID  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL  CHAPTER 66 SPECIAL DISTRICTS  ARTICLE DRAINAGE DISTRICT TO  ELIMINATE CONFLICTS WITH THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  UPDATE REFERENCES CLARIFY  ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS AND  CLARIFY THE TIMING OF THE  PAYMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION  TRAFFIC PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  THANK YOU CITY MANAGER THIS IS  YOUR ITEM.  >> YOU RELATED TO  >> THE NEW CONSTRUCTION  TRAFFIC ROAD SITTING COMMITTED  THIS.  >> OR WHEN TO EXPECT MEETING  ON 23RD TO CONTINUE THE  ORDINANCE HAS BEEN SECOND  READING 6. YESTERDAY THE CITY  COMMISSION APPROVED NUMBER. WE  KNEW IT 23. YOUR DISASTERS,  IT. TODAY THANK ALL RIGHT.  >> AND THEY.  >> COMMISSION QUESTIONS ON  THIS. ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. ALL  RIGHT SOME CLOTHING THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND WITH THE PROMOTION.  >> AMERICA CAN'T I MOVE TO  ADOPT THE ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 DASH 23 HAS PRESENTED A  ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 23 AS PRESENTED AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  WITHOUT GOING TO A VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR.  >> THIS MAYOR'S, YES MAYOR ZS  LANGDON SAY YES DO. YES. YES,  ALRIGHT PASSES 5 TO 0.  >> MOVING ON TO ITEM N  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024. DASH 20  OR CITY CLERK.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  24. AND ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA AMENDING  THE CODE OF THE FOR FLORIDA  CHAPTER, 70 STREETS SIDEWALKS  AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES  CREATING A NEW ARTICLE FOR  CANOPY ROAD ZONE DESIGNATION  PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE CITY  MANAGER THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> IS ORDERS OF COVID CITY OF  REPORTER TEMPERATURE, 70. THE  FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE WAS  THAT THE REGULAR MEETING ON  JULY 23RD, AND IT WAS  CONTINUED AS PRESENTED A  SECOND READING SUSSEX THAT  AFTER THE CITY COMMISSION  APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  TO 24 AS SENATE. THANK YOU.  >> THANK YOU. ANY COMMISSIONER  QUESTIONS ON THIS.  >> NO THANK YOU.  >> AND I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING  ON MY SCREEN. SO ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT. CLOTHING THIS PORTION  OF THE PUBLIC LOOKING  PROMOTION. THEY GO AHEAD MOVE  TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 20 FOREST PERCENT. WE  HAVE A MOTION MADE BY VICE  MAYOR STOKES TO ADOPT  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 24  AS PRESENTED AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL WE WILL DO A VOICE  VOTE.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR S  MAYOR ZS LANGDON YES DON'T  U.S..  >> EMMERT YES ALRIGHT PASSES 5  TO  >> MOVING ON TO ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH PARK.  >> IT'S NUMBER 2024 DASH 28  ORDINANCE OF THE FL AMENDING  THE CODE OF  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL  CHAPTER 82 WATERWAYS. RAIN  RAIN VESSEL REGULATIONS  PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  ALRIGHT CITY MANAGER.  >> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR OF  THIS OR DOES IT THE CODE OF  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT FOR  CHAPTER 82. THE FIRST READING  OF THIS ORDINANCE THAT WAS AT  YOUR REGULAR MEETING ON 23RD  2024 CONTINUED AFTER SECOND  READING. THEY ARE THE 6 STAFF  ASKED THAT THE COMMISSION  APPROVED ORDERS FROM A REPORT  28 AS PRESIDENT. THANK YOU.  THANK YOU.  >> AND THE COMMISSIONER  QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> THANK YOU ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT. CLOTHING THIS PORTION  OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND  LOOKING FOR A MOTION MAKE VICE  TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  28 THAT THE MOTION MADE BY  VICE MAYOR STOKES TO ADOPT  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 28  AS PRESENTED AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON IT THERE'S NOTHING  ELSE WE WILL DO BOYCE VOTE.  VICE MAYOR AS MAYORS, MAYOR,  THE S LANGDON YES GOING US.  YES ALL RIGHT SO THAT  ORDINANCE PASSES 5 TO 0 MOVING  ON 2 RESOLUTIONS. ITEM P  RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024 DASH R  DASH 30.  >> CITY CLERK WITH THIS BY  TITLE ONLY PLEASE RESOLUTION  NUMBER 2024 DASH R DASH 30  RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  COMMISSION OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA AMENDING  CITY COMMISSION POLICY AND  2021 0 MADE IT TO CITY  COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED  NOTICES AND AGENDAS PROVIDING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE THANK YOU CITY  MANAGER THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR THIS  RESOLUTION, CITY COMMISSION  OFTEN NUMBER 20. BUT I WOULD  ASK YOU A POPULATED THE CITY  COMMISSION MEETINGS GO  SCHEDULE NOTICES AND AGENDAS.  THIS RESOLUTION REVISE THE  POLICY REFLECT INCLUSION OF  RESOLUTION APPROVING. MATTERS  UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA  CATEGORY LINE WITH CHAPTER 2  SECTION 2002.2 OF THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE UP ABOUT  ONE IS NUMBER 4 DASH 13 THE  CITY WITH SOLUTION 2024. THAT  3040 INCORRECT. THIS. WE HAVE  TO THE CITY COMMISSION  APPROVED THIS RESOLUTION AS  THANK YOU.  >> THANK YOU LOOKING FOR  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> ALL RIGHT NOTHING FROM  COMMISSIONER. AND RICH WE HAVE  COMMISSIONER LANGDON AND 2.  >> YEAH, THANK YOU MADAM  MAYOR, I JUST HAVE A COUPLE  QUESTIONS ON THE POLICY.  >> ITEM 3. C NUMBER 3 VOTE.  >> SO THAT CAN CENTER GENDERS  VOTED ON WITH A SINGLE VOTE TO  APPROVE THE VOTE SHALL BE  TAKEN BY ROLL CALL. WE  TYPICALLY DO THAT DO WE  USUALLY ABOUT AND THE NORMAL  WAY.  >> OR TECHNICALLY ROLL CALL  VOTES BECAUSE THEY'RE  INDIVIDUALLY LISTED ON THE  AGENDA. SUPPOSE WHEN YOU SAY  ALL IN FAVOR SAY OK I WAS  OKAY, THANK YOU FOR AND ONE  OTHER QUESTION ON PAGE 4. ITEM  4.  >> 8.  >> THE 1, 1, 1,  >> IT'S REALLY BEEN OUR  PRACTICE TO DISCUSS ITEMS  BEFORE WE GO TO A MOTION I  MEAN OCCASIONALLY WILL ALSO  HAVE SOME CONVERSATION AFTER A  MOTION IS MADE BUT. SINCE WE  PREDOMINANTLY DISCUSS THINGS  BEFORE A MOTION IF WE  SHOULDN'T MODIFY OUR POLICY TO  REFLECT THAT. I'D BE  INTERESTED IN I FELT A LOT OF  COMMISSIONERS HAVE TO SAY ON  THAT. NO ONE CARES ASSISTS US  NEWS ITEM KNOW ANY 10 THAT  WHAT PAGE ARE YOU TIME ON PAGE  MORE THE AND SECTION O 4 8.  >> THE 1, 1, 1, OUT.  >> IT WAS LIKE PUBLIC COMMENT  YET WEST A MOTION THEN WE TEND  TO HAVE THE CONVERSATION FIRST  AND THEN GO INTO A MOTION SO  THIS WOULD JUST BE OUR  OPPORTUNITY TO REFLECT THAT IN  OUR POLICY.  >> I THINK I WOULD ADD THE  DISCUSSION THAT IS AFTER THE  MOTION CAN ONLY BE RELATIVE TO  THAT PARTICULAR MOTION. SO  SOMETIMES THE COMMISSION HAS  DISCUSSION ON OVERALL TOPIC OF  AGENDA ITEM. WHEN YOU DO IT  AFTER THE MOTION IT TO BE  SPECIFIC TO MOTION. YES, YEAH,  IT'S NOT CLEAR TO BUT I I DO  HAVE A STRONG STRONG FEELING  ABOUT THAT. INITIALLY THAT IT.  >> IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN  CHANGING. THAT WE WOULD ALSO  NEED TO. AND CITY COMMISSION  POLICY NUMBER 2021 DASH 3,  RULES ORDER AND RULES OF THE  CURRENT RESOLUTION ARE  CONSIDERING TONIGHT IS  WRITTEN. TO CONFORM TO THAT  OTHER POLICY SO IF YOU'RE  INTERESTED MODIFYING THIS  RULES OF ORDER WANTING TO I  DON'T HAVE A BIG HEAD OF  STEAM. JUST THOUGHT IF IT WAS  AN EASY WEEK THAT MAYBE WE  COULD.  >> MAKE THAT CHANGE BUT THAT I  GET CITY CLERK'S COMMENT THE  DISCUSSIONS ABOUT SPECIFIC  MOTION. SO I'M OKAY  COMMISSIONER DOUBT.  >> PREVIOUS COMMISSIONS WAS  QUESTIONS. A PUBLIC COMMENT.  MOTION AND THEN DISCUSSION ON  WHATEVER THAT MOTION WAS. I'VE  SEEN IT DONE BOTH WAYS THE  ONLY OTHER THING THAT I MIGHT  ADD IS CLOSING THE PUBLIC  HEARING. THAT USUALLY TO  REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING  USUALLY ONLY DONE FOR QUASI  JUDICIAL. WHEN WE BECAUSE OF  THE PROCESSES WHEN MAYOR CLOSE  THIS PUBLIC HEARING FOR LIKE  AN ORDINANCE DISCUSSION WE  STILL ASK STAFF QUESTIONS  WITHOUT REOPENING IT. SO I  DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S AN  APPETITE TO POSSIBLY CLARIFY  THAT OR JUST LEAVE IT ALONE. I  DON'T. I. LIKE YOU  COMMISSIONER. BROKE DON'T FIX  IT. BUT AT THE SAME TIME IF WE  ARE TO GO BY POLICY WE ARE  SUPPOSED TO BE DOING GOING BY  POLICY AND IT MAY NEED TO BE  AMENDED. RELATED QUESTION.  >> WHAT WE NEED TO BRING THAT  BACK AS AGENDA ITEM FOR THE  FACT THAT THE POLICY IN OUR  BACKUP THAT MAKE IT FAIR GAME.  >> NOT SURE TO WEIGH ITEM IS  IS NOTICE LEGAL ISSUE WOULD BE  CHANGING ANYTHING. WITHIN THE  POLICY PROVIDED IT'S  CONSISTENT WITH OTHER  POLICIES. OKAY THANK YOU.  >> HOW CAN JUST DON'T HAVE A  BIG HEAD OF TO DO IT.  >> AFTER NOVEMBER MAYBE WITH  THE NEW BOARD IF OBVIOUSLY  THERE'S GOING TO BE A NEW  >> MAYBE THERE MIGHT BE AN  APPETITE TO ADDRESS THE WHOLE  POLICY AT THAT. I DON'T KNOW.  I'M WITH YOU I DON'T THINK SO  WASN'T ABLE TO DOING MUCH OF  ANYTHING REGARDING THIS KIND  OF STUFF IN THIS POINT EITHER  SO.  >> OKAY COMMISSIONER RICHARD  YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON  THAT.  >> NO.  >> ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. OKAY.  HAS IN.  >> SINCE YOU HAVE THIS ON THE  AGENDA. ONE OF MY QUESTIONS  SOME MUNICIPALITIES HAVE  PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> PRIOR TO AN AGENDA ITEM  DISCUSSION BY COMMISSION.  PUBLIC COMMENT COMES YOU'VE  HAD YOUR DISCUSSION AND READY  TO THAT VO. SO ASKING WHY  CAN'T THE PUBLIC COMMENT COME  BEFORE. YOU HAVE DISCUSSION SO  YOU CAN DISCUSS SOME OF THE  FEEDBACK YOU GET FROM THE  PUBLIC. AND MAYBE INCORPORATE  THAT INTO A DISCUSSION AND  THEN VOTE. I WAS ONE OF  QUESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.  THE OTHER SINCE THIS IS IT'S  REGARDING THE AGENDA. I'VE GOT  QUESTIONS. CITY MANAGER PLEASE  DON'T TAKE ANY DISRESPECT  BECAUSE THIS HAS TO DO WITH  YOU SINCE YOU PUT TOGETHER THE  AGENDA.  >> IT'S NO DISRESPECT TO YOU  AT ALL. IT'S JUST BASIC POLICY  QUESTIONS AND AND COMMENTS AND  THAT'S ALL IT IS.  >> BUT I'VE GOT QUESTIONS AS  FAR AS.  >> THE CRITERIA AND THE  GUIDELINES IN CREATING WHAT  EXACTLY GOES ON THE AGENDA.  THE ITEMS THAT ACTUALLY GET  PUT ON THE AGENDA. AND SINCE  THE PUBLIC HAS NO WAY TO  REQUEST AN AGENDA ITEM WE HAVE  TO GO TO A COMMISSIONER. AND  AND HOPEFULLY THAT THEY WOULD  PUT FORTH MAYBE THAT REQUEST  TO HAVE AN ITEM PUT ON THE  AGENDA BECAUSE THEY'VE HEARD  FROM SEVERAL CITIZENS. AND  THEN WHAT IF THE CITY MANAGER  DENIES THAT REQUEST. THERE'S  ABSOLUTELY NO GUIDELINES FOR  THE CRITERIA FOR AGENDA.  ITEMS.  >> AND THE.  >> THE GUIDELINES SET FORTH  CITY MANAGER BECAUSE YOU'RE  THE ONE IN CHARGE OF THE  AGENDA. COMMISSION BODIES ARE  IN CHARGE OF AGENDA. BUT THERE  IS NO SET GUIDELINES AS FAR AS  THAT GOES THAT'S MY QUESTION.  THE CONSENT AGENDA. WHAT IS  THAT EXACTLY THE DEFINITION OF  NONCONTROVERSIAL, I KNOW I PUT  THAT UP. AS FAR AS HOT TOPICS  AT THE LAST MEETING. BUT WHAT  EXACTLY FITS THAT CRITERIA AND  WHAT EXACTLY IS THAT  DEFINITION. SO I'M I'M LOOKING  MORE IN-DEPTH AGENDA POLICY  AND THE GUIDELINES FOR SETS  THE AGENDA. WHAT RECOURSE DOES  THE CITIZEN HAVE OR DOES THE  COMMISSIONER HAVE IF THEY  CONTINUE TO GET DENIED.  REQUEST THAT IS BEING PUT  FORTH TO THEM BY US BY  CITIZENS THAT WE AND PUT AS  FAR AS MOST ON THE AGENDA. SO  I'M ASKING IF YOU COULD PLEASE  CONSIDER WHAT ASKING. AND WHEN  YOU EXACTLY LOOK AT THIS  POLICY. IF YOU MAYBE CAN  INCORPORATE THAT INTO THIS  POLICY. WE'LL HAVE A SEPARATE  GUIDELINE WHATEVER IS GOING TO  BE IN CHARGE OF THE AGENDA.  ALL RIGHT ANY OTHER PUBLIC  COMMENT. ALL RIGHT, IT  >> THANK I CAN REMEMBER. OKAY  YOU YEAH. WE VOTE IN THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND LOOKING. MOTION.  >> MAKE MOTION GO AHEAD MAKE A  MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION  NUMBER 2, 0, 2, 4, R DASH 3,  8, 3, 0, HAS PRESENTED ACTIVE.  >> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION  TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER  2024 DASH 4 DASH 30. I  COMMISSIONED A GALLON THAT WAS  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR STOKES  WE WILL DO A VOICE VOTE VICE  MAYOR VICE MAYOR SO THEY'RE  THE S LANGDON SAY 1000 YES AND  I'D LIKE MAKE ANOTHER MOTION  FOR YOU TURN. OKAY THAT PASSES  I TO SPIRO AHEAD COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION  TO DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO  BRING BACK POLICY NUMBER. A  COMMISSION POLICY NUMBER 2, 0,  2, 1, 0, 5,  >> RELATING MEETINGS AND  SCHEDULES TO DISCUSS THE  PUBLIC COMMENTERS IDEAS AND  SUGGESTIONS IN TOTALITY ADDED  8 TO BE DETERMINED.  >> A SECOND MAP.  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL,  IT  >> DID CAPTURE THAT DIRECT THE  CITY CLERK TO BRING BACK  POLICY NUMBER 2021 DASH 0, 5,  RELATING TO MEETINGS AND SCOTT  COMMISSION MEETINGS AND  SCHEDULES TO DISCUSS PUBLIC  COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS. AT A  DATE TO BE DETERMINED. ALL  RIGHT AND THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON ALL RIGHT  ANYTHING ELSE WILL DO A VOICE  VOTE VICE MAYOR. MAYOR ZS  LANGDON SAY YES YES.  >> YES, OKAY PASSES 5 TO YOU.  0. MOVING TO GENERAL PUBLIC  COMMENT.  >> I WANT CHANGE THE SUBJECT.  THERE'S A COUPLE ISSUES IT  SIGNIFICANTLY BOTHER ME AND I  WANT TO BRING IN TOO  COMMISSION'S ATTENTION BECAUSE  I'M GOING TO BE WORKING ONE  ISSUE HAS TO RELATE TO  HISTORICAL HAZMAT ISSUES. AND  AS RELATE TO. PROJECTS THAT  MAY COME FORWARD FOR THE CITY.  THE SECOND. IS AS IT RELATES  TO THAT. I KEEP HEARING THE  PHRASE. WE DON'T HAVE TO.  MULTIPLE TIMES ON MULTIPLE  ISSUES. AND EXAMPLE WOULD BE  WHEN WE'RE TESTING DURING  ARSENIC IS BEING TESTED SABAL  TRACE. THE PROPERTY WAS  TESTED, BUT THE MAC AS YOU  CREATE WAS NOT BECAUSE. WE  DON'T HAVE WAS THE RESPONSE.  STAFF AT THAT TIME AND I'M NOT  GOING ANYBODY PARTICULAR AND  U.S.. THAT ALSO BRINGS TO  LIGHT. THERE ARE MANY MANY  EXEMPTIONS. 2 POLICIES THAT  CODES THAT THE CITIZEN HELD  TO. BUT STAFF. IN PARTICULAR  OPERATIONS AND PROJECTS. I  HEARD THE WORD. WE DON'T HAVE  TO WELL IT'S AN ADMINISTRATIVE  ASPECT AS TO A EFFECTIVENESS  HEARD MULTIPLE A. AND I COULD  USE ANOTHER AND THAT'S REALLY  STARTING TO BE A BOTHER. AS  FAR AS WE DON'T HAVE TO. AND I  CAN UNDERSTAND WHY STAFF IS  NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME CODES  RULES AND REGULATIONS AS ANY  CITIZEN OF THIS CITY.  WHEN IT COMES TO CERTAIN WHEN  IT COMES TAKING WHEN IT COMES  REMOVING TREES. WELL EVER.  THAT PHRASE IS GOING TO CHANGE  IS GOING TO BE SOMETHING  DIFFERENT ABOUT THAT. THEY  EITHER ADHERE TO SAME COACH OR  THEY DON'T. THAT THAT WHAT A  GOOD SIDE IS RIGHT. I THINK WE  HAVE WON THE MOST PROFESSIONAL  STAFFS. WE'VE HAD A VERY LONG  TIME. I AND OVER WHAT THEY.  AND THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW  POLICY. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE  ASPECTS. THE AGENDA. LIKE WHAT  THEY DO. THEY MAY NOT. AGREE  WITH WHAT THEY BUT THEY'RE  SUBJECT TO POLICY. SO NOBODY  TO ANYTHING. AGAIN STAFF AND  WHAT THEY DO. DOING THE JOB. I  DO. THE PERSON WHO IS HIRED TO  DO A JOB. AND HE IS VERY GOOD  AT IT. PROBABLY 70%. WITH THE  ULDC THERE'S 30% THAT'S AWFUL.  THAT STUFF. AND THERE'S 2 WAYS  TO MANY TO TO GET TO. AS FAR  AS THE 70'S 30 ON THAT RIGHT  NOW AND I THINK THE CITY IS  DOING AN OUTSTANDING AND SOME  OF THE COMMISSIONERS GETTING  THE ANSWERS TO THE PUBLIC. ALL  THEY WANT HIS ANSWERS TO THEIR  QUESTIONS. UNFORTUNATE THING  GET A REAL HARD AS FAR AS  REZONING. THANK THANK YOU ALL  AND THANK THANK YOU. MISTER  ENGLISH.  >> ANYTHING ELSE. RIGHT.  >> I TOO WANTED TO MAKE SURE  THAT. ANY OF MY COMMENTS THAT  I'M TALKING ABOUT. AND  BRINGING ATTENTION TO A  SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL. IT WAS  ABSOLUTELY NO DISRESPECT. SO  EVERYBODY MUST STAND THAT.  ESPECIALLY YOU CITY MANAGER,  NO DISRESPECT WHATSOEVER.  OKAY.  >> ALANA NO DISRESPECT TO YOU  WERE NOTICED TO YOU WHEN I WAS  MENTIONING. PROBLEM THAT I WAS  HAVING WITH THE ULDC THIS JUST  ACTUALLY A COUPLE MORE ITEMS.  ON THE ULDC CHAPTER 6 UNDER  GOPHER TORTOISE.  >> YOU HAVE IN THERE LETTER A  THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND  THEN ACTUALLY RELOCATE THE  GOPHER TORTOISE THEY CAN  ABSOLUTELY NOT. SO THAT HAS TO  CHANGE THE PROPERTY CAN IN NO  WAY WE LOCATED GOPHER TORTOISE  HAS TO BE A PROFESSIONAL. OVER  TOWARDS NOT A NOT PROPERTY ON.  IT'S IN THERE LIKE THAT. MY  QUESTION WAS WITH THE SCRUB  AND HE IS AND THE TREES. WE  HAD A SO THE TREES IN THE PAST  THEY WERE 5 OF THEM. THE  DIFFERENT TYPES OF OAKS WHEN  I'M LOOKING AT THAT I ONLY SEE  SQUABBLE. WITHIN THAT AS FAR  AS MAINTAINING. HABITAT WE  JUST  >> PILING EVERYTHING WITHIN  NATIVE HABITAT LAND MANAGEMENT  WITHIN THOSE AREAS.  >> OR DO WE NEED TO  SPECIFICALLY LISTS SOME OF  THOSE TREES THAT SHOULD NOT BE  REMOVED. THIS IS WHAT WAS  DISCUSSED YEARS YOU KNOW PUT  TOGETHER FOR THE SCRUB JAY.  GUIDELINES.  >> ONE MORE THING I JUST THINK  MAYBE WITH NOTIFICATION TO THE  CITIZENS, YOU KNOW THERE IS.  >> EMAIL LISTINGS THERE'S  NOTES WE CAN PUT LIKE YOU HAD  RECOMMENDED COMMISSIONER  LANGDON IT MAY BE THAT IN THE  TAX NOTICES. YOU KNOW MAYBE A  GENERALIZED STATEMENT TO LOOK  OUT FOR OR SIGN UP FOR EMAIL.  SOMETHING SO WE CAN PROPERLY  THE RESIDENTS AS FAR AS ANY  UPCOMING ZONING ISSUES  REZONING ISSUES. THAT'S REALLY  GOING TO AFFECT THEM. MAYBE IF  WE CAN FOLLOW THE SAME  GUIDELINES SET FORTH FOR  DEVELOPERS. WHAT THEY HAVE TO  GO GO THROUGH AS FAR AS  NOTIFYING NOTIFYING THE  AFFECTED ALL MONIES WITHIN A  CERTAIN RANGE. IT DOESN'T COST  THAT MUCH MONEY IF WE'RE  TALKING ABOUT MAYBE 3,000  HOUSEHOLDS. IF WE DO IT IN.  THE WAY IT'S BEING PRESENTED  AT A $1.50. IT'S LIKE WHAT.  ♪ ♪ 2004 1005 1000 BALLOTS. YOU  KNOW THAT'S NOT A LOT OF MONEY  SO THAT A DIFFERENT PLACE TO  NOTIFY THE CITIZENS BECAUSE  THAT'S THE PROBLEM WE'RE  HAVING. TRUST.  >> WE WANT TO HEAR WE WANT TO  BE PART OF  THANK YOU. CAN'T.  >> ALL RIGHT SO I'M GOING TO  ADJOURN THE THAT YES THAT  TIME. JUST A REMINDER IN YOUR  INBOX THERE'S AN E-MAIL FROM  AN THE INPUT SUPPOSED TO GIVE  THEM THE DIMENSION ALSO IS DUE  ON FRIDAY AUGUST 9.  >> MAKING CASE.  >> CITY MANAGER WAS THAT SENT  OUT VIA EMAIL.  >> A NEW LAW. SHE SAID YOU GET  IN A SERVER THEY NOT DO A LOT.  >> FOR THE DEBT MANAGEMENT  POLICY.  >> YES, BUT YES, SIR.  >> SO YOU NEED TO HAVE IT BY  FRIDAY.  >> JUST OKAY I'LL BE BACK BUT  MAYBE HOST AND YOU HAHA.  EVERYBODY THERE AUGUST. REALLY  I JUST ONE.  >> THANK YOU YOU TOO.  >> SO IT'S NOT A 53 AND I  ADJOURN THIS WILL STAY OFF  DRIVEWAYS WHAT'S NOT ACCEPT  THAT IS