##VIDEO ID:MFInoY_KCVE## all right you're on record all right good evening everybody you guys good down there announcement is made that adequate notice of this meeting has been given and that it is being conducted in accordance with njsa 10 colon 4-6 ex set of New Jersey open public meetings act nor call a rooll Please Mr buretz here M grani here Mr Jos here Mr mozarella here Mr Petty Here Mr Quinn here Mr ready Mr here we have our board planner Mr chadw our board engineer Mr L manowitz here and our board attorney Mr Johnson here all right as everybody knows last meeting was uh the chair's uh Mr kaplan's last meeting with us he stepped down um on to bigger and better things um so we're going to open up Nom biger bigger we're gon to uh open up nominations for a replacement chairperson any nominations I nominate Lor rag second chairman uh I move we close nominations oh I loaded I lo I we got two we're good nominations are closed we anybody else nope nominations are closed Bitz yes bring on for myself yes mazarella yes Teddy Quinn yes ready Wills yes congratulations the floor is your man here we go congratulations congratulations hey um past presidents Bob iraine and Dave Kaplan those are big shoes to fill and I thank this board for electing me as your chair thank [Music] you okay yes please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance IES to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for stands Nation God indivisible I ask that we all stand please for a moment of silence Rememberance of lives lost today thank you can I just swear your professional pleas Please Mr CH can you raise your right hand please you swear orir that any testimony that give tonight should be the truth Tru yes Mr L can you raise your right hand please any testimony that you give tonight should be the truth yes I thank you is there anyone here in the public that would like to speak on anything other than what is on our agenda this evening see none Nora we have correspondence yes uh we received correspondence from Mr zier 24 seminal Avenue block by 39 lot 9 request in application 2416 be carried to December 4th 2024 due to working with an engineer for storm water management so if anybody's here for that application there's going to be no new notice this is your notice you have any questions about that okay we have to make a motion to grant grant that you do yep you do may we have a motion please so move B second that would be with all necessary extensions correct yes it is yep Norah please call the rooll burkit yes Rani yes Josella Ted yes Quinn yes ready yes y resolutions application 2415 Martin Wong you can do the first one on its own the rest of them in a Grove okay so M second grani yes Mella yes Quinn yes ready yes yep application 2446 and application 2429 2449 and 2449 so M second J hold on Burt yes grani yes dowit peddy yes Quinn yes ready yes willing y it a 2444 Frank and Denise Petrino please come [Music] forward can you raise your right hands please you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give should be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth can you please State and spell your last name starting with you please ma'am [Music] sir thank you could you please please sit down could you please tell the board why you would like to uh have this application approved uh we we placed air conditioning it was for a new air conditioning to be you know installed a new unit our old one broke so we repl place to with the new one how long was the old one there 36 years wow that we did it's going in the same place as it was same place exactly everything's all the same same size everything so why are you here it wasn't approv decid the Minimus I'm going to be voting in favor of it let's move ahead no questions f it up is it on a concrete pad uh yes is that pre-exist the concrete pad or you need to install that no they it's um they put it in when day they put it in when day when they it's not even a side it's on concrete blocks okay and then they have like a a plastic tub they hold it gotcha I just wanted to make sure I had the resolution correct that's there's a side side yeah it's existing same as the exting ex no change it's any questions from the board of this applicant would some would like to uh frame a uh application 24 you want to open it to the public oh sorry about that is there anyone hear from the public that would like to speak in regard to this application see none would someone like to frame application 24 col 44 Franken Denise ketro Pinto 7 monito Avenue block 563 lot 9 Zone R4 recommend granting a c variant to install an air conditioning unit replacement contrary section 43035 colum second vertz yes bani yes AST mozarella yes py yes Quinn yes ready yes willings y any IDE thank you can we give this uh president any idea when the application will be of given to him so what happened uh after it's uh approve the resolution uh within 10 days I'll get it out in the mail to you then you'll go and I'll I'll mail it to you you'll go to the Zone in department for your Zone imp perment and then the construction okay thank you thank you have a good night guys application 2453 John Thomas [Music] can you raise your right hand please do you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give should do the truth whole truth or nothing but trth can you state your name spell your last name please [Music] th could you tell this board what your would like to do at your home please sure I'm a replacing my air conditioning with the the air conditioning that was previously there was a build uh too close to the property line so I like to get a variance to replace it at the same spot is it going to the same place yes it's the same as the last guy yep did you get 38 38 years no yeah I got 19 years out pretty good I got six out that's I think it's the Minimus in nature going to be voting for it yes second yes Y is there anyone here from the public that would like to speak in regard to this application Pro or against see none would someone like to application 24 call 53 John Thomas 62 winter said Drive block 1402 lot 11 Zone off for Grant to conceive varant to install an air conditioning unit with pad contrary to section 43035 column 8 second ready B yes grani J mozarella pedy yes Quinn yes ready yes willing yep application is approved you will be getting a notice from this board thank you thank you enjoy application 2454 Stewart freed [Music] another air condition must a sale the air can you raise your right hand please that's right you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give should be the truth the hold truth and nothing but state your name spell your last thank you can you can have a seat Mr freed would you please tell this board why you would like to have this application approved we are installing a mini split system air conditioning unit um with just a little bit too short of uh the code to reach the it's it's actually just a little bit too close to the neighbor property by about 6 in we're installing the air conditioner unit because it's just becoming too hot for us to live in the house and this is a new unit not a replacement this is not a replacement unit this is new it's just becoming it's kind of a health hazard it's uh just becoming too hot my wife has health issues and uh we were told to keep windows closed and keep the keep the temperature down did you talk to your neighbor that you were going to put any yes of course we did they're very cool they said do whatever you got to do no are there any questions are there any questions from this board to this applicant no would someone like to frame I keep on forgetting sorry about that are there questions from the public in regard to this application Pro or con see [Music] none would someone like to frame you're on a roll Scott okay application it's the Minimus nature I'm going to be voting for it and I'm going to start talking again application 24 calling 54 Stewart freed 32 Beachwood Avenue block 576 Lot 4 Zone R4 recommend granting a SE Vari to install an air conditioning unit with pad contrary to section 430 column 8 second oops yes bani yeset Mella yes Teddy yes Quinn yes ready yes will y Mr freed your application is approved and you will be getting a notice from from the township thank you very much thank you thank you application 2439 Alfred figeroa 82 Beachwood Avenue C variant to install a shed replacing the existing one and 6 ft high fence contrary to section 430-10 c shed and rear yards section 430-10 D1 SEC 43-35 columns 10 and 13 can you raise your right hand please yes you swear or affirm there the testimony that you're about to give should be the truth the whole truth the truth I do can you state your name and spell your last name Alfred Figaroa FIS and Frank I Gaz and GF u e r and Roberts o a Mr figuro would you please tell the board why you would like this application approved the shed that I've currently got in my backyard sits about an inch sorry a foot foot and a half away from the existing property line been there for about 40 years according to my neighbors who have been there for 50 years it's Fallen apart that said there's a bunch of of let's just say trees poison ivy grass behind it that I can't get to or maintain it just to get it out of the way so that said one I'd like to replace the shed because it's all bar two I'd like to move it away from the property line so I can get behind there and do whatever maintenance I need to also in the future if I want to install a fence replace the fence right now I think I got what you would consider a chicken wire behind it i' like to replace the fence line eventually at need to space um and generalizing it all that's pretty much what I what I'd like to do is the proposed shed the same size as the existing shed yes sir and the 6ot fence is only for the back of the house yes sir front not the so the the taking the old shed down and putting the new one up you maintain the same coverage pre-existing non-conforming it's the same it was 53.3% now it will be 53.13% with a new with the same exact size shed yes okay and the and the building coverage will also be exactly the same because it's the same shape okay and it's actually getting further away from the property that's my intent yes and the fence is going around the backyard side and the back yes ma'am of your property you're replacing chicken wire with a decent fence Yes sounds good to me are there any questions from the board of this applicant yeah back here any questions from the public regarding this application pictures would someone like to frame SC it okay come on on Miss in nature replacing the shed with the Same Size Shed I'll be voting for it application 24 call 39 Alfred Figaroa 82 Beachwood Avenue block 575 lot 7 Zone R4 recommend granting a c variant to install a shed replacing existing and 6 fo high fence C charity section 430-10 c shed side and rear yard section 430-10 I section 43035 colums 10 and 13 second ready B yes yes yes yes Teddy yes Quinn yes ready yes willing y application is approved be getting notification from our Township thank you very much everyone have a good evening thank you for your improvements application 2424 Charlotte Hogan Timothy McCall now it's been going pretty smooth tonight you're hoping it's going to stay that way can you both raise your right hands please if you swear or affirm that the testimony that you are about to give should be the truth the whole truth and nothing please state your name charl Hogan h Tim M MCC thank you you can be seated you please tell the board why you would like this application approved well um we have a small house and a growing family um the addition that we're seeking to add um would enhance the safety of our home um by creating greater visibility inside the house um and one of the most efficient economic ways to add more to our home um and since we live in Mount Taber our lot size is non-conforming the way it is um small lot size and um our plan stays within the impervious coverage requirement and the distance from our neighbors are you moving it further away from the street no we're adding in line with where the front of the house currently is um which is non-conforming currently you're removing your slate walk yes and you're adding you're adding the new addition correct no no planned walkway to go around the addition correct just going to so the access to the patio in the back will be from back now yes tomorrow yeah okay it's very di Minimus just one silly question the one variance you're seeking is uh looking in building coverage maximum low is 15% you're going 16.6% so very dous di minous but uh I guess that my point being it's so small that addition what what's what's what's that 1.6% additional needed for it it'll allow us to um move our kitchen and create a little bit more living space on the first floor of of the house um and uh it also is a the basement first floor and would add a bedroom onto the second floor um so it's a very efficient the most efficient way we could figure to add the second floor you don't need a variance for it's just correct correct perious coverage okay are you doing a full second floor or just on the addition part it's um it's a cape style house so it's a technically a half floor um it just in line with the current roof line okay so it will look like the house was built that way um and in keeping with our neighbors okay okay out outside will be uniform yes yes so there's not currently a second floor anywhere else or there is uning to that second floor just exactly the way it current yes yep any additional questions from the board to this applicant nice job looks like a nice job if someone would like to frame resolution questions I apologize are there any questions from the audience in regard to this application BR Pro or con C9 would someone like to frame a resolution for this applicant than all right right I'll give it a go Application 24 col 24 Charlotte Hogan Timothy mccole 17 Hill singer road block 91 lot 17 Zone R3 recommend the grant of C variants to construct a two-story Edition and screened in porch cont section 43035 columns 4 and 10 second book yes grani yes J mozzarella yes EDD yes Quinn yes ready yes will [Music] y good luck than you lots of luck your growing family location number 2447 has M Associates Incorporated good evening everybody Thomas J M Jr Vogal Chan Collins and Schneider on behalf of the applicant H Associates congratulations Madam Carolyn on your appointment this evening I hope we can be as efficient as the prior applicants you seen and heard from tonight I have two Witnesses site plan engineer Mr Eric Keller professional land use planner M Christine the phone and they'll explain to you in testimony why uh we are entitled and and and hopeful that the board grants final site plan approval for the Trucking terminal that has been constructed at uh block 76 68 1.01 in the par gener generally located at 1100 Edwards Road so with that uh I could have Mr Keller sworn in perhaps and we can get right to it you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give should be the truth of I do state your name by your last name tell us who your employed with certainly Eric Keller K ler I'm employed by Bowman Consulting Group six Campus Drive s 302 por siany why of you provide the board with the uh benefit of your education experience okay The Bachelor of Science and civil engineering from Ren leer poly Technic Institute I attended a master's program at the University of Maryland uh I'm a licensed professional engineer in this state uh for many many years and I have testified on numerous occasions before this board I see some new faces from the last time I was here I can go on but why yes you Eric in the in the keeping of brevity Eric can you summarize for the board um what exactly has happened uh since we obtained a preliminary site plan and variance approval for this property and it's used as a Trucking terminal for the parking of automobiles and various related type uh vehicles and Equipment certainly I I put the S plans on the board just in case there's any questions um this application received preliminary site plan approval back in 2018 at the time the township was still granting preliminary and doing final when it got built I understand you don't do that anymore but that was we only got preliminary approval so we're here for final site plan approval this project started Construction in uh early 2023 uh the work uh was completed earlier this year the township building department issued a certificate of occupancy for the trailer on the property and for the associated building related work that was done primarily the the like the construction of this site is generally in conformance with the approved site plans uh prelim preliminary site plans that were granted by this board um any of the deviations are minor in nature and do not affect the function or performance of the property um when this project was approved and we're still seeking to maintain those conditions of the approval is we had four options for how this s could be used essentially it's a large not paved area it is uh sealed uh millings which is consistent with what the approval was for that are strike right now for truck parking but there were also other options for mix of truck parking and car parking uh in different configurations the owners would are seeking to maintain that that was granted by this board as part of the preliminary approval depending to meet their needs and to meet their tenant needs um for uh the use of this property it was also a minor subdivision uh that was granted by this board to uh provide a a sliver of land to the Mars County mua that has been perfected they now own the land Deeds recorded um this uh project also required a flood Hazard permit from the D that was uh obtained uh with a certain amount of of net fill that was permitted uh to be placed on this site uh we have verified that the fill that was placed on the site is actually a little less than what the permit was granted which is a good thing so we're within the confines of our D approval um and the only other Real Change Is that the office trailer uh was approved it was granted a variance because it was too small it was granted a variance to be 500 square ft um and the office trailer uh that is on the property which is acknowledged in the certificate of occupancy building department is 320 Square ft so we're exacerbating previously granted uh size of the office trailer by 180 Square ft so um we have received comments uh from Mr Chadwick Mr L manowitz we've um provided a summary of letter in response to to those uh it was dated August 30th of 2024 um I will state that uh we have been working with the project surveyor um we do have some uh grading modifications minor grading modifications around the Basin um to uh increase the height of the BM um it had become overgrown this summer with all the rain and everything else uh um and once we got that all cut down and cleaned up we realized that we needed to do a little remedial grading uh which we've been working with the applicant uh to uh Source appropriate material do that work we'll get a final asil survey and provide it uh to Mr L manowitz and to the board showing that we have complied with the detention Basin requirements storage requirements for that BAS so even though the detention Basin has changed slightly that doesn't change its functionality in any way correct it's it right now the elevation of the top of the BM around the Basin is at what is a flood Hazard elevation but you're supposed to provide a foot of free board should be a little bit higher so but the the outlet structure itself the um the D made us change the water quality devices as part of the approval um so we have these uh green infrastructure treatment devices called aquaponics um that will still function as designed um and the uh the Basin itself will function as designed just to note when there's a flood Hazard storm the whipy river has a much bigger drainage area than our site and the flood Hazard elevation of the whipy river will actually inundate the detention base but we have an approved design and we have to meet and you indicated previously your willingness to comply with Mr Leno's recommendations correct um could you address Mr Chadwick's recommendations let's talk about the regrading before we get to the real issue sure the Mr regrading did you take any of the trees along 280 down no this will not affect any of the trees L 280 I was out on site uh today one say Monday I can't even remember what I did yesterday um there we noticed that there are five trees that have died they will be replaced um at the end of the month CU you know along 280 along 280 right yeah they'll be replaced but any of the work within the Basin itself is nowhere near any of the trees okay um as far as I would assume Mr gone is going to address the one issue that is in the report because you address going to address the variance right I do have a question about some of the conditions for approval that were in the prior resolution okay um I don't know if you have that unfortunately so one thing I forgot to break was the resolution for well I I can I think that' probably be easy to to address so it's paragraph s um and number one was a lighting plan approved by the boards and Township experts was that done do you know that was completed it's lining plan lighting oh lighting yes that was that was approved by the township engineer Mr Lisa um and that was documented um forget when sometime in like 2019 or okay there was also a condition that there be did we have the lights out on those poles or do we leave secur they're I don't think I think they're on a a photo I don't think there was a condition for in the resolution it's it's a long 280 it's next to the transfer station and it's across the street from the sewer plane so I mean the lights on 280 are on all the time and we're right near the Edwards um interchange so you know it's a a well illuminated area gotcha and there was also a condition that there be a landscaping plan approved by the boards and Township's experts do you know if that was completely yes it was great that's what they're replacing okay and then off fence as approved by the board's planner do you know if that was accomplished yes it was approved great and the last condition in this paragraph was all approvals by the njde and the US EPA I assume those were all done that is correct great we have we have a closure plan approval from be we also got the flood Hazard uh permit from D okay and all the other conditions of the resolution um have been complied with correct that is correct the the township would not have signed our preliminary site plans without satisfaction of all those trait I just wanted to make sure it was on the record no absolutely you you said originally in just this probably a silly question but you said the um you granted the ability to build at 500 ft for the trailer 500 square ft right corre because it it originally had it too small what was how small was too small well the minimum size is a 5,000 ft building and we got approval for a 500t trailer okay I mean it's basically a storage area and and you need just some place for somebody to uh manage the operation uh control traffic in and out things like that and it was determined that even 500 ft was larger than they really needed I I read it as it had to be 500 minimum I'm I'm good now no that is oh when you built it you built that 320 right so I I don't know exactly what we do about um well you're asking for a Amendment to the appr approved I I mean if that's what you determine as a board is required I did notice for it I mean I think you heard Eric say feels that it's the Minimus and not a substantial deviation from what was preliminarily approved right but but if this board and its experts and professionals disagree maybe put on the I did notice for put on the record exactly what the trailer is being used for it's it's it's being used for the office the administrative operations of by the tenant of uh who's running how many employees are there at any one time well we don't have any tenant yet there are two office areas within the trailer with the bathroom I mean 320 Square ft take out for the bathroom and you know I mean it's it's a generous space I mean it could accommodate uh you know a handful of employees probably it'll depend on what the tenant wants needs place in there but essentially this is a storage yard for is that is that Traer going to be man 24 hours I I I don't know I mean the gates there are Gates that have access to the property um and they're locked when when the facility is not right now it's not in use because it's not well the nature of the tenant would seem to me would be all hours throughout the day and evening they it would be tenant driven if I mean if they wanted to have a a 24-hour security presence they could certainly do it I mean it has bathroom facilities it's not set up that way do have bed doesn't have beds in there no no the board like to ask any more questions of this applicant no thank you okay with that I have a again our licensed professional land use planer M Christine gone here tonight well I I did have one more question sorry I'm I'm a little confused in in Mr Chadwick's report he talks about removing Pages five and six five and six are the alternate uh usage plans of not all truck parking but a mix of truck and car parking uh those were granted by this board uh is part of the preliminary approval and the applicant does not want to give up their rights to that so we are requesting that that those sheets made as part of the set and I would refer the board in uh professionals to Pages five and six of the resolution that contain recitation regarding those four plans so these are alternative plans depending on the tenant correct correct right and the idea is that you know the co is issued and the Tenant comes in it should be allowed to configure its operation based on one of those four plans the tenant then leaves and a new tenant comes in it should not have to return to this board or my client is the owner of the facility should not have to return to this board to amend the site plan approval rather it should be an administrative function uh that that that could be addressed by the township engineer with any dispute that can't be resolved returning to the board but I I I think that it's better not only for my client but for the board in the township as well to have that kind of mechanism in place just gives you some flexibility it gives us flexibility at this point in time you do not have a tenant that's correct but the the plans that were submitted at the time that you got preliminary site plan approval included yes those alternates as you indicated its reference in the recital of the testimony contained in the resolution yeah and these plans are exactly the same as those except it's his final site plan and there are some additional notes referencing the ad survey and to Mr Keller's earlier point the preliminary plan set was executed and approved with those with those alternates included there so you're not asking for any additional use relief other than what you were previously granted corre that that's correct and and again I'm suggesting that if you agree with me that this can be an administrative function when or if a configuration needs to change as long as it changes to one of the approved options okay P of engineer can simply does not have to I I understand so you okay with that Mr Chad the condition number one we've lumped a three different activities shown in what the sheets four five and six where are you in the resolution item condition one and we talk about a truck terminal which is the sheet the first sheet of the out which is sheet four this is how it's stried today yeah and Mr K's basically taken the term truck terminal to include the layouts of five and six so this is five which becomes a car storage yard and trucks and the next one is construction vehicles and cars and Drug s you refer just to make sure is just a flipflop right just to make sure I understand Mr CH you're talking about condition one of the approved resolution correct which just for the record States the conversion of the vacant cap landfill into a truck terminal shall be accomplished in accordance with the testimony and plans submitted by the applicant to the board you're testifying that both sheets five and six were part of the preliminary approval corre yes okay right and and the notice calls this out too I mean it was approved and we're seeking now final C it was primarily approved as a truck terminal for the parking and storage of automobiles comma trucks Comm trailers comma buses comma and construction vehicles and equipment with such parking and storage authorized to be configured in one of four matters that's the notice for preliminary you just read that was the notice for the final site plan the pr the preliminary plans Mr Keller testify have those all four Alternatives I think that's more important than what you put in your notice yeah well these are the they were in the preliminary approv they were absolutely okay cuz when I went back to search my files whatever I I had that sheet oh well sheet four whatever whatever it is okay I have like 14 different versions okay we can just verify that I mean if it turns out that they weren't part of the set of plans that we approved a couple years back uh then we're going to come back and see it talk about it otherwise I don't see there's any need to discuss the issue at all if they were part of the preliminary approval then my statement is incorrect if they weren't then we've got to deal with with it I'll put on the record that they were part of the approval and I'm happy to provide you know I think I I think I had to sign preliminary approval I may not I I don't remember I'm sure turn all is oh yeah I know that I know that Zora has it right the reference to plans in paragraph one would include those sheets yes sir and Mr Keller we're happy to have Mr Keller provide conf as aiss of final site okay okay I think that clears up that issue the re the rehabilitation do you have a performance bond on this or no the I don't believe that any bonding has been I mean it's built I don't know talking about the Landscaping I not to my knowledge I the the approval I think has a most most approvals have and I'm sure our plan say there's a two-year uh guarantee that if the the plants die then they have to replace them and we're already where some you know they would have replaced them now except they told them not to because with the weather we're about to have yeah they'll die again so let's wait till the end of the month when it cools down a little bit unfortunately um and we'll plant the trees in they're they're all Evergreens yeah so all right so is that little vacant area along 280 you put them right we had them um refer to the plan sheet that you're going to I'm referring to sheet 7 to 13 of the final site plans we have two clusters of trees one um that starts just north of the detention Basin and extends in a subbly direction along the 280 right away and then we have another cluster um where there was a I think a gap in the trees up near the North End and all that material has been planted [Music] okay there any other question so to conclude that basically they've satisfied fire report they've already addressed the engineer Madam chair just to close that Circle I have been in contact with Mr Keller and agree that the uh the detention Basin needs some massaging we'll say uh it's not a major doesn't appear to be a major excavation at this point just making sure things work uh and I don't see there being uh any issue with that um that would require them to come back uh I'd have no I have no issue with with handling that as a condition if the board so desires and the applicants committed to satisfying the man it's on uh on the detention based in any other [Music] comment good okay so are we ready for uh Miss Kone or main issue yep okay raise your right hand please do you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give should be the truth the whole truth and nothing yes say your name spell your last name it's Christine cfone coo f o n e first name is Christine with a c h r i s t i n e business address is 125 Half Mile Road Sweet 200 Redbank New Jersey 07701 and testifying this evening as a licensed professional planner I've testified here in pany and about 450 other planning and zoning boards throughout the state of New Jersey I'm never home at night um I am practicing for about 28 years now as a planning expert so not quite as long as Mr Chadwick but not brand new either I Planning and Zoning courses for the Ruckers Center for government services um a court appointed affordable housing special master in a few dozen communities um and my licenses are current invalid you are qualified thank you Christine can you address uh variance that we cited for the further undersized trailer yes so I mean it's really a very dominous exception because the Ford granted be reled previously there's a 5,000 ft minimum building requirement so that just speaks to um you know what is required where we had approval for a 500 square foot one so certainly the deviation of about 100 square fet shaved from that is going to have no material impact on this property it's not as if we were building a building that was going to have a ton of employees going to it and it changes the dynamic or it changes the intensity of the use it's really just um a more efficient trailer on site it really has no material impact or no impact at all on the operations of the site so to the extent that the relief is required and we need to reprove the D variant um when that was testified to it was really testified that under a price be hedi that that was a bulk variance that was subsumed into the D variant so that's how it was testified to in conjunction with the last application I would say that that is still appropriate for the board to consider that relief in the context of the overall D variant and it continues to be my position that the site is suitable for the propos Trucking terminal and other um vehicle storage and that the board could grant that relief for the um for the non Conformity with the 5,000 fo size and with no substantial detriment to the town Zone plan is the fact that it's less in size create any issues in your mind in terms of its functionality as it's for its intended use it does not it it will continue to function as it was intended uh I believe Mr uh Keller provided pictures to to the board of it it's there it's functioning so I see that it will have no material change uh from the site as was approved by the board right now you don't have questions I'm sorry right now there's no tenants for the site what if the tenant comes in and wants to have more employees on the site longer term what what's going to happen I mean I I guess it's it's a silly question in a way but the point being structure that you have right now cons serve a couple desks and a couple phones right so either way if it was an applicant that was going to have a ton a significant amount of employees coming to the site the change in the size of this trailer I believe they'd have to come back to the board we're only talking about 100 square feet so 10x1 area so the change to me is not Material if you had such a change where the applicant was going to require space for an applicant space for employees to come and spend some time there and function they would need to come back to the board and show it on a site plan so but if that were the change they were doing that anyway because whether it's almost 400 or almost 500 not a great place to store or house a ton of employees so in my opinion it's really not going to have any impact whatsoever thank you I guess just out of curiosity what was the reason for deciding to build it smaller and not just do the 500 the drill you know it was probably the available product that would that they could give there here so probably you know what they could what they could get access to what they could find you know to build and and reasonably get to the site okay they found the trail of someplace and reab I think that's what Mr colge report shows okay any questions from board this applicant Phil do we need to clarify this trailer I think we all assumed it was like a uh not a dispatch drill but just some somebody who would check people coming and going from the site I would think it's going to take on a security function too unless is do you know if they're going to put cameras all around or you know I'm not sure how how they intend to use it if they're going to put cameras on it or not I think that would be somewhat tenant driven so when they have a tenant and they know how long or how many people are going to be here then I would think they'll know what type of security system they would be having I mean in terms of the usage him if it becomes a security attorne I think we going to have somebody sleeping there don't they have to be awake no no you ever seen overnight people spells and whistles maybe we should put a c in that little TR to keep I know is there a condition right all the trucks have to be empty there there's no uh had to do with fuel and that kind of well rehabilitated landfill so there's no hazardous materials stored on site petroleum products and whatnot and remember the applicant and its tenant users of the site will always have the duty to comply at all times with not only the permitting and governmental approvals they've obtained including those obtained from this board but with all Township ordinances with the construction code with the construction subcode so there's non-compliance there's enforcement actions or the applicant or its tenant returns to the board to to seek an amended approval but we're not at that point right now we're simply seeking final site plan approval an amended preliminary I guess if as Christine said to the extent required for a smaller I'll be a slightly smaller trailer don't just looking for clarification as okay were you stating they could have trucks on this site full of fuel oil no okay no I mean they they trucks could park cars parked cars and trucks have oil that's not what I'm talking about that there no tankers I think is right there's a condition in the resolution that says the applicant will not be allowed to store any hazardous or flammable material at the yeah we fully intend to comply with them again it's a I just want to make sure story doesn't eliminate a a tank any additional questions from the board no anyone here in the public that would like to speak on behalf of this applicant in favor of it against it I don't see any would someone like to frame a resolution for this applicant sure if it is the Minimus in nature they're going or 100 squ foot less it means nothing I'll be voting for it and it's application number 24 col 47 hm Associates Incorporated 1100 Edward road block 768 lot 3.01 Zone Li I W-2 recommend granting a final major site plan approval of a parking lot and truck terminal and the variant for the smaller facility subject to the conditions we discussed subject to all conditions discussed second ready b b Bernie say yes he say yes yes he say yes okay Jos yes Mella yes pedy yes Quinn yes ready yes will yes grani yes thank you very much I'll send you a draft for the resolution make sure we've covered everything we talk about tonight thank you again have a good night every everyone again and congratulations again thank you sir may we have a motion motion to adjourn second every meeting has to be this [Music] airing for everyone that's thank you thank you thank Youk