oh [Music] n [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] good afternoon we're going to go ahead and get started uh it's 1:34 p.m. uh and this is the uh July 25th 2024 regular meeting for the seminal County Code Enforcement board uh first of all welcome I'm going to give you some information here momentarily but before we do that uh let me uh ask Madame Clark to do a roll call for us for board members please here cineon here Mike here dley here here present thank you uh so we do have a quorum uh next we are going to do the Pledge of Allegiance followed by the swearing in of witnesses so if you're going to testify in any fashion today just remain standing after the pledge for us please pledge allegiance to the of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all we going to be testifying please to remain standing raise your right hand and Madam clerk will swear you in here thank you and I'll give you some information momentarily however I want to suggest that we revise the agenda and go in order to take care of everybody that's here first uh and my uh request for the revision would be started with case number 19-112 CB Miguel and Maria I Leon Miguel a leon 128 Helen Street of popka Florida 32703 don't come up yet if that was your name uh to be followed that's on page two uh to be followed by case number 23-36 CB JM excuse me JC MJ LLC Christine Crow registered agent 1980 Cameron Avenue Sanford Florida 32771 that's found on the top of Page Three uh to be followed by cases uh there's two cases with this respondents on page five case number 24- 64 ceb Delroy Clayton and Latoya Myers Clayton 2643 Sand Lake Road Longwood Florida 32779 they have another case that is 24-65 CB same address same respondents uh then to be followed on page nine the top of page nine lean request 24-16 CB uh Londa Jones uh no address it's an unassigned parcel I believe uh to be followed on the next page case number 24-24 CB Mark and Vivian Severson 3331 Elina Court Winter Park Florida 32792 they have three more cases same respondent same address but those other three case numbers will be 24 - 28 CB 24-29 CB 24-30 CB after we take care of that assuming this motion there's a motion for this it would be the case of on page 14 top of the page 24-36 CB Ruby Smith and Jimmy Smith and Johnny day Jr 125 54 to Pew Street alont Springs 32701 and then we would go back and start in order for those folks that are not here today so my my suggestion or request is to get a motion to take the cases in that order have ation yeah Mr Bates made the motion right Mr Bates second by Mr Ross I think yes I'll I'll I'll be a second okay thank you to take them in the order that I just recited uh and with that being said let me just give you all some information real quick here and it's easier if I just read it thank you good afternoon and welcome to the July 25th 2024 hearing of the seal County Florida code enforcement board before we begin I would like to advise everyone about the procedures that govern appearances before the code enforcement board this meeting is open to the public under Florida's government in the Sunshine Law therefore every effort will be made to hear all persons having relevant evidence or arguments to offer it is required that every person who appears before the code enforcement Board needs to register with a clerk if you haven't already done so the cases where the respondents are present and signed in will be heard first you'll be sworn in or affirmed by the clerk if you haven't let us know when you get up here I believe you all have once all the cases is whether respondents or present have been heard the code enforcement board will hear the remaining cases as they appear on the agenda when your case is called please be seated at the table reserved for the respondents that's this table right up here the county will present their case and then the respondents will be allowed to present their case additionally please limit your comments to only information related to this case each party May question Witnesses offered on behalf of the other party additionally staff members May question those appearing before the code enforcement board the board will then make their decision based on the evidence and testimony as presented by both parties all proceedings before the code enforcement board are electronically recorded please speak directly into the microphone at the center of the table and state your name before presenting your case should you need the assistance should you need assistance due to a hearing impairment or a language barrier please inform the clerk upon registration all cell phones and other electronic devices are to be turned off or silenced while inside the chambers thank you for your cooperation so that's uh what you need to know we're going to call the cases up here in the order we said again you'll be at this table when you're up here the officer code of force is going to present their case please let them present their case you'll have an opportunity to speak this board here is going to make a decision so your comments will be to this board and they may have some questions for you with that being said any other questions we'll get started uh bringing us to I find my agenda again starting with uh the case on page two c uh CB 19 excuse me case number 19-112 ceb Miguel and Maria I Leon Miguel a leon 128 Helen Street pop to Florida 32 703 if you're here as a respondent please have a seat at the table and then we're going to once you get seated in there ask you your names once you get comfortable there sir we'll start with you if I can get your name es Michelle hton daughter and I'm sorry your name again Esther Michelle hton daughter thank you and the sir I'm Reuben Leon a brother of Miguel Leon Reuben Leon you're the brother of Miguel yes you you speak English Okay correct yes okay excellent um okay with that we'll go ahead and get started uh s a dare whenever you ready code enforcement officer Cameron at s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 19-112 CB the respondent is Miguel and Maria I Leon and Miguel a leon like to give a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk as exhibit a the violation is located at 128 Helen Street sem County Florida the violation charge of sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defined in 95.3 B uncultivated vegetation the board initially heard the code enforcement board order was initially on July 25th 2019 is the repeat violation initial inspection was on April 19th 2024 a repeat letter was sent to the respondents on June 26 2024 and followup inspections were May 3rd May 20th June 17th June 26th and July 24th 2024 the followup the results of the follow-up inspection were the uncultivated vegetation remains so this is on the initial inspection of a repeat showing the uncultivated vegetation around the property on July or April 19th this is a followup inspection May 3rd the vegetation Still Remains in the same spots this was taken on May 20th there's been no change you can see where the arrows point but vegetation Still Remains this was on June 17th they did cut a portion of the property but the vegetation remains and that was the day of posting this was on July 24th so yesterday the vegetation Still Remains the suggested recommendation by the enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 19-112 CB it is determined that the respondent Miguel and Maria I Leon Miguel a leon is or are the property owner of record located at 1208 Helen Street located in semal County as determined by the property of appraiser records is in possession or control of the property and is in violation of semal county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defined in 95.3 B it is further recommended that based on the findings of fact and conclusion and Law and Order issued on July 25th 2019 the code enforcement board issue an order imposing a lean in the amount of $4,900 for 98 days of repeat violation ation from April 19th through and including July 25th 2024 and the fine shall continue to acre at $50 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th this concludes my presentation thank you any questions rer adir uh yes sir is this a result of a new complaint how what's the origin of this complaint so the origin of this complaint um the code enforcement officer before me Dorothy herd brought them to code board in 2019 or was this your old case Cara it was Cara's case my apology so she brought them to code board already it came into compliance but then recently back in April I got another complaint from the county commissioner um assistant so Lee Constantine's assistant betri Flores she advised me to do another inspection see if there's any other violations or and that's how we found it was in repeat any other question questions one or two maybe maybe I missed it but is it a residence that this is at or no correct residents residents and it's lived in somebody's living in there I've never had contact with them but I believe someone's living in there yes okay right and the $50 is comes as a result of the prior fine yes right that was the amount the amount that was approved so that's why you you recommend okay yes one more question do you have the date of when this place was brought into compliance from the original complaint um is it was an action in 19 and then they went before someone and had those reduced to solely administrative costs do we know what that date was how long it took them to get in compliance the previous time when they were out of compliance give me one second I can pull it up for you I don't I don't have it on hand but if you want me to look right now I can I mean when when they begin their presentation maybe you could get that information and have when they're finished okay wonderful any other questions okay uh this is your opportunity uh to respond to this you've heard what the recommendation is uh and so that's what we're that's what we're trying to decide today what what the next step for us is going to be on this case the floor is yours yes sir thank you thank you uh in November 30 last year we did a what is it called eviction a AIC eviction eviction order in this house uh Liv he my brother was living in the house at that time but because of all this garbage and all these things that J Tommy Tommy Tommy Jay Leon is the grandson he's having these bicycles and ladders and think that he want to recycle and keeps adding last two months he put another white truck I you saw the picture in here with the front end broken those car need to be moved the house in the in the bathroom you can see the the the sky it's no drop ceiling the RO roof is is going since the storm because of that Maria had to put in a nursing home uh three months ago to pass away in my house and Miguel he has I'm taking him for now for chemotherapy he has two stage cancer I wanted to put the roof in the house sell it but because the eviction I can do nothing I cannot go inside the house he has a dog in there for 2 years dead in the freezer in there there's no water in the house for more than 2 years and a bill for $2,000 that he broke a pipe or line and I don't know how to get rid of him and the authority haven't done nothing we we have letters I posted copies of this in the house let me ask no nothing just to get some clarification here uh Maria pass she passed away and Miguel Miguel Leon is my father he passed away he passed away too yeah and my brother Miguel Alon is my house and I'm taking for chemotherapy right now and and he has a blood cancer his son that used to helping in the House pass away last year with cancer thew also what that house okay well this was out of comp compliance once and then it came into compliance and now it's out of compliance again so we're sort of focused on that and trying to get you back into compliance so that's where we're at uh and continue I apologies I'm just trying to get the players here I took my niece his daughter and an attorney and we have a power of attorneys so we be able to come here I went to the house the young is still accumulating in there and we have the telephone his mother in Georgia and he said oh he's in Theona no he's so where I don't know I can never see him I can never see him and I need some some authority to to take everything out of there because actually he's he's invading a property that's that his he doesn't pay rent in a he doesn't do nothing my brother allowed him in one limosine that he has in the street park before he sleeping there with some dogs well let's stay focused on we're here today for the uncultivated vegetation that that issue is what we're here for today okay it's no way to get inside actually if you try to get to the back of the house the the trees and the the bushes the house is in a living condition there no way nobody can live in there that needs to be cleaned up but it's no way to get in Access in there because he have two or three cards in there he golf course and motorcycle a boat too many J Around the the whole the whole place there no way we can get it nothing Mr s you get some yeah I have a question so the owner the only living owner of this home that's listed here is Miguel a Leon Leon yeah okay and ma'am are you his daughter I am the daughter and um we should meet the we have we went in 2003 and to do an eviction Noti on Tommy J Leon he got the letter he didn't respond um I think we are supposed to go to the Sheriff's Office so the Sheriff's Office can deliver this to the him I believe um we can do that today and if you would please give us some time so we can evict Tommy J Leon out of the house to give him some time to move his cars out of the way before you find us because I I have death all around me I lost my brother through thorough cancer my dad has cancer I don't know if he came from that house and I don't want to lose Tommy J Leon too so is your issue is that you have a tenant that was evicted that won't that you have access he got the letter because um on um 2003 we we got the uh you can have 23 this is the eviction notice for Tommy G Leon to to leave but um I don't know if he got served so we have to go to the Sheriff's Office to serve him I believe when what's the date that you started with this um November 30 back in November last year yes 30th of November 2023 does some of let me ask quick question is that going to work I don't know we don't know what we're doing the self-help uh Clerk's Office helps them move papers in the right direction does some all have that do you don't know yeah don't know but we can't tell you how to handle your internal problem I wish we could uh you may want to check with the clerk's office at seal County Orange County they have a unit that sometimes helps you tell you what you but that's a whole separate issue so we're here today and all we're going to do is determine how to handle this issue with the uncultured vegetation and we're at a late stage here this isn't a good thing for you ought to be in this position because the F's already gone uh it was found in violation in 2019 somehow got brought into by and it's out of violation again or out of compliance again so what these folks here want to hear from you is what your plan is to get this thing fixed and how quick that's really what they're waiting to hear okay we're going to the Sheriff's office to see if I can get this letter that we wrote to the courthouse to to get him an eviction to get a cop out there to serve him so he knows to leave I don't know if they did that already but we got to go and check and then just give us time for Tommy J Leon to get that service notice so he can leave the house and get his cars and put it somewhere else uh my uncle built his home where he lives and he is trying to get him out so we can fix the house and my dad wants to sell the property can I make an amendment to my earlier statement please so on October 24th 2019 an order was issued reducing the fine to uh $389 64 to be paid by November 23rd 2019 uh the fine will revert back to a lean amount of 3700 if not paid the the original fine was never paid so so that would be on top of um the 98 days of non-compliance as well so they were um that they came into compliance then sometime between October 24 and November 23 of 2019 so or no so it came into compliance July 25th or sometime in between July 25th 2019 and October 24th 2019 the the actual date itself was October 23rd do you happen to know if somebody attended the hearing to get that reduction or if we just did it because it was in compliance and just moved along I could not answer that okay I was just curious okay all right and are you do you currently have any other Active cases with this home or is this only uncultivated uncultivated ve vegetation because what I'm hearing from this side is that there's a lot more than that yes so there's a lean on the house or the property for rubbish and I have an additional case for uh abandoned junk vehicles that will be brought to the boards in the upcoming months that hasn't made it our way yet okay thank you those aren't repeats those are new the vehicles is new yes according to the original order the respondents were not present okay at the reduction thank you so this the original case apparently they came into compliance and it was coming up in front of us because it was in compliance nobody showed up to ask for that we just did it because it was in compliance and reduced it to admin cost if it was paid or and it wasn't paid so so Mr chairman so or I guess offic officer camera so it's not just $44,900 it'll be the $ 3700 because they didn't pay the prior um they revert it back to 37 and then is 4,900 on top of that correct so 86 total $8,600 total and then $50 a day as well correct for future moving forward yeah okay yeah Mr B did I hear correctly you say that this gentleman some relative is living in the house now no oh okay I was wondering about wait Tommy J Leon is in that house and I was notified by my daughter he is bringing other people to rent rooms but didn't you also say there's no one there's no water in that house no because someone tampered with the um the pipes and my dad now has ,000 Bill and my dad hasn't paid it and um but I know that the electrical was cut off from my dad's name and it's put under someone else's name I don't know but there's lights in the house thank Mrs Townson I don't have any questions I'm ready to make a motion but okay before we move from so we can frame the motion correctly if this is where it goes the total that's due now or what are we requesting for a lean so requesting for a lean would be the original amount that was not paid which would be $3,700 in addition to the 98 days of non-compliance totaling $4,900 so in total it would be $8,600 plus the lean amount in for non-compliance I'm confused here was the the administrative 389 was paid back in 2019 no no was not okay thank nobody should that's why it red to the original thank you so the uh the to clarify the request by staff is uh uh apply a lean impose a lean for $8,600 $50 going forward for continued violations that's what staff is requesting that's where we're at I think that probably more than anybody I have a history of agreeing with staff however I'm going to make a motion contrary to that I personally would like to see us table this to the August 24th meeting give these people a chance to evict the people who are um illegally in the home and revisit this at theice August 24th meeting and I agree with that oh just for clarification the 3700 is already in place so there's really nothing that can be done about the 3700 amount so really what you're addressing is 4900 okay okay just so we all clear gotcha as far as the lean goes right because that other lean is already in place as soon as they fail to make that payment it automatically is there so the only thing before you today technically is the $4,900 so if you're asking for a tabling of the matter you're just addressing the 98 days but the amount will continue to acrew at $50 a day and so that amount will be larger if you revisit this in August okay and what was the date of August 24th at our August meeting and I seconded her motion thank you uh okay so we have a motion on the the table here to table this until the August 24th meeting just call out a continuance just continue the matter yes and I and I seconded her motion to continue okay motion by m Townson second by Mr Ross any other questions all in favor say I I so that's what we've done we've given you some more time you need to get this thing moving I would suggest you do what you want but August 24th is our next meeting we simply put this on hold until that meeting the fine continues what we'll be looking at when we come back uh is the staff recommendation a $4,900 lean to be put on to it on top of what's already there and $50 a day going forward so that's where this is at you all know what you need question yes ma'am is there any way to disappear that or my dad has to pay that well that's a lean that's going to be applied you could you know we have another hearing on the 24th and you make whatever request you you want at that point if Tommy Jay gets out and we get the Tommy Jay's cars out of there and my uncle fixes it can youall drop the let's just be clear cuz we're focused on the uncultured vegetation right now okay so the whole Tommy thing and being in there and getting them out that all with you all okay I mean we wish you the best but thank yeah thank you uh okay and that's what we've done so if you have any questions you can speak with oser Adair after you uh okay when he gets through with his his presentations today thank you for coming in and uh wish you the best there thank you thank you uh that brings us to on page three top of the page case number 23-36 CB JC MJ LLC Christine Crow registered agent 1980 Cameron Avenue Sanford Florida 32771 and I believe we have an attorney for that case correct sir correct I'm not Christine Crow okay uh in your name sir my name is Joseph koves I'm an attorney from the Lou Law Firm okay uh all right who does he represent who do you represent sir uh I represent the respondent here J cmj LLC and for the record although he's not with me at the table and authorized representative of the respondent is is with me in in the room as well that's Mr James Crow okay and he's what of the representative he's an authorized representative that's his official got sort of sunbiz designation thank you for that uh and uh let's see we can officer Henson whenever you're ready code enforcement officer uh Shannon Henson County sheriff's office North Region for the record of submitting this copy for the presentation to the clerk as exhibit one this case is 2336 CB J C MJ LLC Christine Crow registered agent of 1980 Cameron Avenue the violation is simal County Land Development code Chapter 30 part 47 section 30.8 A2 concrete crushing is not a permitted use in M1 zoning District without a special exception this case was originally heard by the code enforcement board on August 24th 2023 and an order was issued filing the pro finding the property in compliance the order stated that there would be $100 per day fine if the violation was repeated after September 1st 2023 an Affidavit of repeat violation was filed by the code enforcement officer after reinspection on May 24th 2024 an Affidavit of compliance after a repeat violation was filed by the code enforcement officer after reinspection on July 22nd 2024 the recommendation based on the findings of fact conclusion of Law and Order in compliance issued on August 24th 20204 2023 I'm sorry the code enforcement uh board issued an order imposing a fine in the amount of $6,000 for 60 days of repeat violation at $100 per day from May 24th through and including July 22nd 2024 if the I'm asking the board that the violation is repeated that they increase the fine to $500 a day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th 2024 this concludes my presentation thank you um reading it's it's comply by when I'm sorry they're in compliance right now okay um but this has been a repeat violation and it's only $100 a day so we're asking that it would be moved up to $500 a day if it falls back out of compliance I got it okay thank you can we go back to the please to the photos and can you explain what's going on at this property this was um just today the property is in compliance it came in compliance on Monday the 22nd of July um before that um if we go back one I think that was yeah the same day um the was uh last year no that was oh the this was the um second time I went there I went there May 24th and they were crushing concrete and it's not just the tools that they're using right there but also when they're doing it any kind of crushing would be uh considered concrete crushing because they were using just uh pounding it at the time before they got the new machine in for the actual concrete Crusher so that was when it repeated and the photo right before what we're looking at now was June 28th I think June it was more yeah okay if she goes back to the very first all the way year I'm wondering what they're doing now that back so that was last year and then they came into compliance and then may they this is what they started doing again and then June looked like it was still going on and that's the concrete crushing machine on the right the brand new one and then that's July there's machine still there and then that was July 22nd he I received a phone call that they had been they are in compliance and cleared everything off of the property with that concrete Crusher is this open lot there it's a construction company so there's actually a building commercial building of some sort yes altering so I I have a question because I'm a little confused so they in compliance you're not asking us to find them necessarily just saying to increase if they do it again instead of doing it $100 at per day to put it at $500 that's what you're asking but not for like this $6,000 we're not dealing with that I'm not asking that to be increased it just be falls out of compliance again for the $500 a day well no she's asking for the 6,000 for the time that they were in repeat violation and then if it falls out of compliance an increase fine to 500 that's what I thought but that's not what I heard so that's two yeah it's two parts of it so the 6,000 for the repeat time and then an increased fine if they don't stay in compliance right thank you for the clarification understanding that they are in compliance now how many times have they been out of compliance when I have had this case that was the very first time they've been out of compliance okay the can you go back to I'm sorry your first screen with all the inspections and there's a lot of dates there there was like 15 dates or something uh follow up inspection so those inspections they were in compliance or I'm just wondering how much of a problem this has been to y'all but I guess that's covered in the 6000 is I I from from what my understanding is there was compliance in all of the 23 follow-up inspections then there's a gap of 9 months and once that Gap once they reinspect in May was the first photo I saw that was non-compliant makes sense thank you anything else before we have the respondents okay sir I'm going to call you Mr K because I didn't really couldn't write that fast sir this is your opportunity to to speak um may I ask officer Henson just a few questions uh officer Henson good afternoon um were did you visit the respondents property on July 18th 2024 I don't have that on record no I don't uh during your your site inspections your site visits your Communications with the respondent have they been generally Cooperative in your investigation oh yes um what so I'm I I will apologize I'm I'm somewhat new to this proceeding um and I I was not a part of of respondents Team during those inspection dates and the the earlier hearings but what specifically is the text of LDC Chapter 30 part 47 section 30882 that was violated it would be a not not permitted use unless they had the special exception so it's not permitted in that um Zone and that's what it says in section 30882 it doesn't say that that means it's not permitted if it says concrete crushing is permitted then it would be permitted well let me get clarifications and I understand his question uh and I haven't read that but it would list everything that is permitted if it was permitted in there really list that one okay list of permitted uses and if it's not a permitted use then it's not permitted it's just if it's not there it's not permitted okay thank you you'd have to get a a special exception Council if you have uh an example in that code that suggests it says it's permitted we' certainly entertain listening to it well I asked that question because I can't specifically find section of 30.8 82 in the code I do see the permitted use table at section 3.5.2 is is that the source of the violation it's um Chapter 30 Part Five Section 30. 5.2 permitted use table and footnotes and in that table it suggests that activity with concrete may require a special exception um in in an M1 District for it is chapter 30.5 section 30.5 what was it2 use is unpermitted it still need would need a special exception our verbiage has we just uh got a new code table and so our verbiage hasn't changed just the tables so the numbers are different thank you very much officer hon question uh so again my name is Joseph koses attorney from L Law Firm um I I have a few brief comments just to sort of lay the background uh this is a M1 zoned industrial site it's been industrial will continue to be Industrial in the future as you've heard the respondant um operates a construction business the concrete crushing was using old material crushing it to then use in its business in the future um business has been operating there for a few years there's been a lot of Home Development around the property um now respondent very clearly understands the requirements for a special exception if it chooses to crush concrete on site that requirement does not take away the fact that it's an industrial site so we wanted to go on record that we are here we are in compliance we are cooperating with code enforcement um but we very much do continue do plan to continue the industrial use of our industrial property um the crushing activity notwithstanding um I I do want to respectfully submit that my client the respondent went into compliance on July 18th uh 4 days before the affid of compliance I recognize that officer Henson was not out there there's no Affidavit of compliance I do have an email a written email from Mr James Crow um who has communicated with officer Henson um the authorized representative stating that it was in compliance on the 18th to the extent the board imposes the fine requested I'd asked it be reduced to uh $ 5600 $5,600 in light of those four days um I also want to call into question the fact that the notice for today cites the incorrect code provision um again we aren't here to contest the underlying violation but there is a a procedural question with the code provision cited um I am available for questions but I I thank you for your time and I I thank you for letting me make those remarks thank you any questions for respondent has your uh client applied for a special exception yet I I do not know so we we my firm has been engaged to advise them what they can and cannot do in the property and we are very clear on what they can and cannot do though and I I apologize for interrupting you but oh no you didn't um so but your your request was just to reduce the fine to 5600 CU that's yes sir okay Miss hunson do you do you have this do you have you seen this email that he's referring to I do not have an email I got a phone call from Mr Crow on Monday the 22nd I went out the exact day that he called me one question do you have any information you could share with the board as to why after the first order went out it came out of compliance for 60 days what happened I I do not know I apologize I I would move to modify I mean $400 isn't going to kill anybody so I just moveed to accept the staff's recommendation as it is and including the increase cuz now they have a lawyer and they should know that they what they can and can't do and let's move forward with the staff's recommendation section to and that includes the days the the four days that may be in question the what's the amount I'm sorry let me it's 6,000 versus 56 5600 also I'd like to make a friendly um Amendment to the motion if I could I'd like to amend the motion to make it Ironclad clear which section of the statute um in the Land Development code that has been violated here because clearly it's not 3.88 to as as it says on my page I I don't think that makes a difference one way or the other because we're not giving legal advice and we just either have to find them or not find them so I again I stick with my motion that we just go with the staff's recommendation and they have the r attorney they can explain to them how to comply with the statutes and stuff okay St recommendation on the fine at 6,000 and the increase for future violations of five correct I I'll remove my second you you say you remove yeah I'm removing my second okay uh is there let me try to clarify this uh the fine is to accept staff's recommendation as presented which would be a fine of $6,000 uh and uh going forward violations at 500 a day we have a motion Mr Ross do not have a second at this point second second by Mr Bates before we vote I mean I just I would like to know I mean if if it's going to go in the record as we're finding them for a part of the 70 land code development code that they're either not violating or doesn't exist I mean where are we at yet they are they were at the time this is coming in as a repeat so at the time it was brought before you this was the accurate section it's been brought as a repeat the evid the testimony was that the numbers have changed the use scale the use I guess what the use chart has changed the numbers but the actual content has not changed that helps thank you okay they need to vote there there's a witness I'm sorry yes and there were some people that came in too but yes uh whoever the first witness is so you have a f you have a motion and you have a second okay okay um I missed the witness I think I can I I I'll I'll withdraw the motion so that the the people can speak I think that's probably right vote on the withdrawal what's that you have to vote on the withdrawal you have to vote on a withdrawal Robert's R of order say that we have to vote on a withdrawal I can't with I can't vote I can't make a motion to withdraw my own so can somebody else do that okay okay I I move to withdraw my motion so that we can hear further Evidence I'll second this motion withdraw okay all in favor say I I post okay uh so let witness speak who is the witness um is this Miss Valerie bomino yes okay uh thank you she was sworn in okay yes I am um I just made a few notes and and I just want to let you guys know a few things my name is Valerie bombino and I live at 3974 Silver stream Terrace which is in the Riverbend Community adjacent to this Cameron property that is in question I represented several resident homeowners for the past couple of years that are very highly affected by not only the concrete crushing emitting glass chars in the air but various other things that are permitted that are not permitted for the zoning area of the parcels that he occupies from what I understand it needs a special exemption to be able to do all of that and it takes quite a bit of work to get that exemption because now it is a residential Community all the way around all all 13 Parcels I um I just wanted to know that we have lots of videos and there's people that my my house actually is about 500 ft away but there are people that are right butt up against this area that it is like a construction zone at this place right in your backyard and these are really nice houses and some of them are twostory and they could see all of this construction and mountains of things and it looks like a quarry I just wanted to make this observation known we have a lot of videos all of these kind of pictures have been from the people in the neighborhood so that's what I have to say thank you very much I have one question these people bought this house knowing that was there uh no it was not there there was just there was just a property the construction site was put there after the houses were built mhm thank you quick question I'm familiar with at least three or four River bends in Seal county is this which just general uh the one right off of Cameron Avenue it's actually butt it butts up against his properties his Parcels okay all that that uh it's the one right off of 46 46 and karon oh okay then now now we're five of them are so the first one thank you thanks much uh any other questions for the witness are there any other Witnesses uh I saw some people walk in see for another case okay did they check in do I need okay go ahead you need to now keep mov keep going uh okay uh are we ready for a motion I move to remove no I'm just being I move to uh accept accept staff's recommendation as we discussed earlier is there a second second motion by Mr Ross by Mr Bat the set status recommendation is presented in this particular vote let's do a show of hands uh all in favor of this motion please raise your hand all opposed raise your hand and then pursuant to Florida statute section 112. 3143 Mr Davis has to abstain he has a conflict okay and he so I think your motion passes yeah okay he didn't vote he did not vote okay uh so the motion it failed I thought it pass 3 to two okay oh yeah okay all right so uh that's what we did we accept st's recommendation as presented uh thank you so much for your time and your inquit and offering what you did thank you chairman thank you uh brings us to our next case which is found on page five towards the bottom p case number 2464 ceb uh deloy Clayton and LaToy a Meers Clayton 2643 Sand Lake Road along with Florida 32779 and there's another case that we here along with that one and this is also a dare again whenever you're ready sir ma'am can you identify yourself hi amatoya clayon I must apologize for my husband he was not able to make it today no that's fine thank you yes sir go ahead code enforcement officer Cameron andir s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is K number 24- 64- CB the respondents are Delroy Clinton and Latoya Myers Clinton I'd like to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation of clerk as exhibit a the violation is located at 2643 San Lake Road in Semel County Florida the violation charge is s county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defined in 95.3 B uncultivated vitation the initial inspection was on March 7th 2024 notice the respondents were sent on March 21st in April 4th 2024 compliance dates were set for April 4th 2024 and April 18th 2024 followup inspections were March 21st April 4th April 18th July 12th and July 24th results of 2024 results of the followup in inspection where the uncultivated vegetation remains on property this is a picture taken on the initial inspection March 7th 2024 followup inspection uh March 21st 2024 grass remains this is a follow-up inspection on April 4th no change this is on April 18th you can see some of the grass has been cut but a majority remains this is date of posting on July 12th the grass is growing back and this is yesterday the grass Still Remains however I did meet with Mr Delroy he was on site working to correct the violations um I I I'm unaware to the grass how it standing is today but he was removing the other violations for the next case the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 24- 64- CB it is determined that the respondent deroy clayon and Latoya Myers Clinton are the owner of recorded property located at 2643 Sand Lake Road located in Semel County as determined by the property appraiser records are in possession or control of the property and are in violation of sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as Define 953b it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issue an order for the respondent to correct the violation honor before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove all uncultivated vegetation over 8 in in height if the respondent does not comply with the order or find a $50 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation thank you any questions offer there big is the parcel uh I don't have exact measurements but I'd estimate like an acre this a is this a has a residential home on it or no no it's just a vacant lot for now uh Mr Delroy said they would like to build a house eventually but as of now it's just a vacant lot tell me what the source of this complaint is I believe it was one of the nearby Neighbors any other questions why don't you do the unpermitted one and we're there's two violations here we're going to come back let you respond to both of them go ahead and do the um and this is uh we're going to jump to the second case 24-65 CB same respondant same address uh appears to be unpermitted use whenever you ready sir code enforcement officer Cameron adir sem County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 24- 65- CB the respondents are Delroy Clayton and lato Meers Clayton would like to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to clerk it's exhibit a violation is located at 2643 San Lake Road semal County Florida in violation charges semal County Land Development code Chapter 30 part 12 as to find a section 30202 use is permitted storage on a vacant parcel is not permitted use in r1a zoning District initial inspection was on March 7th 2024 notice respondents were on March 21st and April 4th 2024 compliance dates were set for April 4th 2024 and April 18th 2024 followup inspections were March 21st April 4th April 18th July 12th and July 24th 2024 results of follow-up inspection the unpermitted use violation remains on property again this is the initial inspection these are pictures showing the debris on the property um those are like cable spools and utility trucks this is on March 7 no change on March 21st you can still see the spools and the trucks followup inspection April 4th no change still has the spools and the trucks April 18th this is when they cut the grass but the storage violation remains this is data posting some of the trucks have been removed but there are still the spools and two trucks in the background and this is yesterday's inspection uh Mr Delroy has removed all the trucks but the on seen in the image but the spools still remain the suggested recommendation by the Cod enforcement officer is based on testimony in evidence presented in case number 24-65 CB it is determined that a respondent Delroy cleton and Latoya Myers cleton are the owner of record of the property located at 2643 Stan Lake Road located in Sim County as determined by the property ofer's records are in possession of or control of the property and are in violation of SEL County Land Development code Chapter 30 Part 12 section 30202 it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issued an order for the respondent to correct the V viation honor before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove all vehicles and storage from the vacant parcel if the respondent does not comply with the order of fine of $100 will be imposed for each state of violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation thank you any questions off sir there see none uh this is your opportunity to speak uh to these two issues we have two issues uh one is the uncultivated vegetation the other there is the unpermitted use which is a storage those things that are still out there before she she speaks can we ask them there been a lot of phone interruptions on on the the side okay thank you okay uh man' this is your opportunity to speak to these two issues sure I must apologize to the county for those violations first of all um one um in terms of the overgrown vegetation it we purchase it as a um a basically like that so in terms of the overgrown vegetation we were not aware that after purchase we would have to start um keeping it low because that's how we purchased it um now that we know we have um taken steps we've purchased a lwn more we have taken steps to keep it low but as I said like we just purchased it last year and prior to purchasing it that's how it like we didn't purchase it with grass lower than 8 in it was all wooded and um grown um to in terms of the violations the dates that are there um we again apologize for not responding earlier we get our mail most of our mail is electronic and we went on vacation came back and noticed that the um we weren't getting anything at all so when I reached out to the post office they said oh we thought you moved so we stopped sending mail to your your address which I didn't know they would we didn't request for mailes not to come so that's why we didn't respond because we weren't getting any mail and as soon as I got this I told my husband and let him know in terms of the trucks being there we were not aware that um they cannot be there if you don't live there because other homes in the area does have trucks park and not know is not saying that oh I am right but um again I apologize we have since removed all the vehicles and the property was cut yesterday and we do have um prior to now we did contract uh persons to come and cut it for us and we are since going to um get a lawn mower to keep it clean thank you questions you believe that this will be fully in compliance by the date that's listed there it's already in compliance there's nothing on the property the only thing that it was cut uh we used yesterday a company came and used a drive-in mower to cut it so the grass is about 2 3 in tall if um higher if if that high and there are no vehicles or the schools or anything like that on the property officer dare you have anything to add as far as what she just testified to I do not thank you so he hasn't been back since she says it's cleaned up you're looking for an order in case there's a future violation yes sir it's what we're looking at right here to find that they were in violation so uh staff's recommendation on the uncultured vegetation is to give them a compliance date even though she says she's in complian of August 8th where $50 day fine going forward the other unpermitted use same date August 8th or a fine of $100 per day on that one that's what the recommendation is taking one at a time uh 2464 CB which is the uncultivated vegetation is there a motion I Believe Miss Myers Clayton wanted to say one more thing oh I was just going to say I wasn't sure if you were the one that was there yesterday with my husband um after you left I believe when you met him yesterday he was in the process of he was waiting actually waiting on that company to come and get the grass card um so he that they came after you left yesterday so there's nothing there's no violation there now okay so I will have to do a reinspection just to verify and then we'll take it from there all right sure thank you uh anybody have a motion I'll make a motion to accept staff's recommendation motion by Mr Davis set say recommendation as presented is there a second second uh second I Mr signing all in favor say I I oppos he and one name Mrs Townsen uh so that's what we've done you've got to August 8th uh on on that you say you're in compliance but here's what happens just make sure you stay in compliance or the fines can start right away the second somebody reports it and he sees it so that's that case we're doing I just want to ask um it was like this for many years it's some place that I drive past every day on my way to and from work and then why now I'm not saying the the trucks should be there but why now the rush to get it it appears this is when it came to the attention of the county you know we see a lot of cases you sort of inherit whatever you inherit and unfortunate but you've got it sounds like you got it fixed so uh the next case on this respondent 24-65 CB we've already heard man we're not done yet we still have one more case for you uh if you want to hear it it's up to you yes I do okay Delroy Clayton and LaToy Meers Clayton uh same address 2643 Sand Lake we heard the case this one staff is recommending compliance date she says they're in compliance of August 8th same date or $100 per day fine that's the recommendation we have on the table uh I'd like to move that uh we accept staff's recommendation and re reduce the uh amount of the potential fine uh from 100 I believe it was 100 correct correct correct down to $50 a day okay um that's your motion that's my motion okay motion by Mr sinning set say recommendation as presented however reducing the fine of future occurrences are found at $50 per day as opposed to 100 second by Mr Ross uh motion by Mr s second by Mr Ross any other discussion all in favor say I I oppos nay and we had a nay here uh M oh oh okay and Mr Davis was a name okay so it passes uh and so you just need to be aware you come into come at at a compliance again that's what happens $50 for the one violation 100 for the other and thank you for working on that to your husband thank you and uh good luck 50 50 oh 50 on each 50 on each one I'm sorry I said 100 that's okay yes all right than you okay brings us is that it oh no it brings us okay page nine uh case number 24-16 CB uh lond Jones unassigned parcel ID alont Springs 32701 and this is aer's case again AER whenever you're ready this is a lean request by the way we've heard the violation on this already we good code enforcement officer Cameron at s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 24-16 CB the respondent is Londa Jones going to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to clerk as exhibit a the violation is located on East Altimont Drive in semem County Florida the violation charged sem County Land Development code Chapter 30 part 11 as Define a section 30. 1882 uses permitted storage on a vacant parcel is not a permitted use in an R1 zoning District the additional inspection was on October 5th 2023 the code board order date was on June 25th 2024 and a follow-up inspections were on April 29th June 25th and yesterday July 24th 2024 results of the followup inspection the UN permitted use violation remains on the property so just to refresher this was a date of initial inspection these are photos showing the debris in the back on October 5th 201 23 these are follow-up inspections on April 29th 2024 so this is after the hearing date um working towards compliance uh more pictures from April 29th showing Mr Jones trying to clean up the violation this is on June 25th 2024 this is the I believe when the order date was uh still see the rubbish uh there's Mr Jones again or this is a p pictures from yesterday fall up inspection before the hearing you can see Mr Jones still removing the debris in the back a lot has been removed I can give him credit for that but a lot also a lot Still Remains these are more images from yesterday's inspection shown the rubbish out front the suggested recommendation by the co Enforcement office officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 24-16 CB it is determined that the respondent Londa Jones is the owner of record of the property located at East Alan Drive located in s county has to determine why the property appraiser records is in possession or control of the property and is in violation of s County Land Development code Chapter 30 part 11 section 30.1 182 it is further recommended that the code enforcement board based on the findings of fat conclusion and Law and Order the code enforcement board issue an order constituting a lean in the amount of $3,100 for 31 days of non-compliance from June 25th through and including July 25th 2024 at $100 per day and the fine shall continue to acrew at 100 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th this concludes my presentation oh I'm sorry next slide oh yeah the concludes my presentation thank you any questions to officer officer dare if you um do you have a concept of what percentage of the of the junk has been removed I do not um after inspection yesterday I the initial inspection photo showed the large junk pile but after seeing it removed there's more violations behind it so it is a vacant parcel still so nothing could be stored on it there's still cars carbs tents Etc I have a question remind me this is the property behind the barbecue place correct uh behind the it used to be pan is Mexican I think now it's something else okay well make sure thank you any other questions for the record it's law Le and era currently they just opened okay okay uh Mr Jones or daughter it's your opportunity to speak to this um um he wanted to let you guys know that he's he's actually been working hard to clean it up um please take in account that this um property he has had his property for over 45 years so this is not just stuff that just appeared there like over time this stuff has been there for 45 years so he's doing like everything he can do himself because him he's the only person cleaning it up so he's doing everything he can do himself um to get it done um he said it um he was told that he had 6 months to get it cleaned no what did you say do give me 3 months I asked for six mons okay he asked for 6 months and they gave you 3 months and they gave him 3 months um but like I said he's doing his best to get it clean um you asked for a percentage um it's a huge percentage compared to what was there before you know so it is a big difference but I mean he's doing the best that he's can that he can I see I've been doing this him play there for 45 years yeah I told him yeah he he's had a property 45 I mean I thought I grandfather then I didn't know was a cold violation would I had cuz I've been back there for 45 years he said he was under I had control of that property for 45 years and I'm uh for jump and everything is not a business it's my living and let me ask you I'm sorry sir go go ahead it's it's my living and what I say I go out and pick up stuff and people bring it I don't buy nothing I pick it up and bring it back in process and take it to the and sell it to cycle place right it's my living and I say I I knew I couldn't do it in those 3 months to clean it up no way that's when I asked for 6 months well it leads me to my question uh and I remember the case you here last time and I had thought my question was going to be because I thought you said it was cuz you're scrapping activities and it helps you make love is that that doesn't look like scrapping stuff to me oh that's that's um all scrapping stuff that's actually um see you the stuff that you see in the bags here or plastic or or cans well see I bring that in every day and I process it and get C okay that's that's GI to me every day I go and pick them up at the factory would they at play what they make drinks now that right there tomorrow he' be gone yeah okay it doesn't justify whether it's it's something or not that you're scrapping I'm just curious uh no something take consideration yeah but that is what is exactly in those bags that that is p makes sense yeah anything else they may have some questions I have a question for the officer there um besides these violations once again is this even a permitted use in this zoning District to be scrapping it would not be a permitted use no it's a residentially zoned area and you can't do that in a resident this property is UN residential correct on Al M Drive I mean it's entirely bordered by commercial property so excuse me go ahead oh my man goes in and out but uh go ahead go ahead go ahead um sir all we're asking for is more time to get this to get this done you know can I say something yes ma'am he the problem is if he continues to do it it's never going to go away it's never going to stop right based on what I'm hearing is if he keeps trying to do what he's trying to do it's going to continue to be a problem I understand that too um what he's saying is that like he says the stuff um that's there like you see now he said we'll be gone tomorrow basically what he's trying to do is get the stuff that's been there for all of these years you know what I mean this stuff this okay yeah granted it's a it's it's an issue but um that in the grand scheme of things that's not the biggest issue at hand you know what I mean as far as these can's being out here he has bigger issue in the back that he's trying to clear up you know what I mean try explain the best I you're doing a good job but you have to kind of make him understand the cans coming in are going to continue to keep you out of compliance correct correct I also okay AB unrelated to this case I have a open case on his actual residence where he has two RVs and a vehicle that are inoperable um yes may I speak on that and I was told by I'm sorry what is your name she said they were going to bring the RVs to the lot and just store them there to clear up the violation so it's not going away we're not here we're not do you hear that okay but we do consider other events and that that may be later yeah maybe later we're not yeah we're not talking we're talking about whether or not there's going to be a lean today applied as a result of the March date when yall were here I think you both were here and you were given a time to to fix and it's not fixed and now we've heard testimony you know there might even be new stuff coming in so we're trying to determine a lean whether a lean needs to be applied and how much uh any other members have questions motion the the the request is for a lean of $3,100 for 31 days of non-compliance to continue occurring at $100 per day that's the request uh floor is open for Miss Townsen do you have something uh as I recall in our last meeting we discussed this being a health safety uh issue and in that regard I would make the motion to go along with staff's recommendation I'll second that motion by Miss Townson second by Mr Davis to accept recommendation as presented uh any other Mr Russ question when you said the health safety issue what I'm not I'm not against I just don't that we tagged it do you want I don't remember yeah because the fire department I believe had said that it was impeding uh their access on the to any emergencies so which that has been clean not that way anymore right we understand it's just something to remind you that's a good it doesn't change what you're doing here today that's give the county a little more Authority if nothing happens that's all I yes sir okay so where were we had motion by motion second by second by Mr Davis to accept s recommendation as presented anything else discussion comments all in favor say I I oppos that's what we've done so the find are still acre uh you know the the quicker you can get that done the better please communicate with officer Adair and thank you for what you've done yeah I I understand I completely understand what you're saying it's just a bit it's unrealistic to think that after 45 years of of accumulating things you're going to be able to get rid of it within 3 months but I understand what you're saying and she's absolutely right about you know keep bringing in stuff you're going to keep accumulating stuff I understand that but I'm just trying to look at it from a realistic point of view it's just unrealistic to even think that you can get rid of all of that stuff that much that that appointed time the stuff I'm bringing in I don't take it in the bank y I'm talking about like the can there that the only thing I bring in cuz I get them free and I'm not going give up that them can call that's my living until my I get a trailer load of cans a week that P $500 a week good will you give it up you un talking about it's free I ain't got to pay for it yeah but what he's saying is that he's not here to determine that Factor he's here to determine about this Lan so good luck thank you thank you okay uh brings us to on the next page page number 10 top of the page case number 24-24 CB Mark D and Vivian M serson 3331 elen Court Winter Park Florida 32792 they have a total of four cases on this same property same respondents uh whoever's here for that case I've noted somebody's here if you can step up to the table have a seat add these two to the end of your agenda okay okay L they after after Johnny day 68 68 okay sorry the heck I'm sorry I'm sorry folks give me one moment here oh here we go we'll do those at the end okay okay uh whenever you're ready go ahead and oh well let me let me read it into the record I'm sorry I think you oh I did okay the serson yes go ahead Tamara judges seal County Sheriff's Office east region code enforcement for the record I'm submitting a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk as exhibit one thank you this is case 2424 CB respondent Mark D and Vivian M seever the viol the viol is located at 3331 Alina Court seon County of Florida the violation charge rubbish my initial inspection was on October 16th 2023 the code board order was on May 12th 2024 um my most recent follow-up inspection was yesterday July 24th 2024 the results of the follow-up inspection the violation of rubbish remains on the subject property these pictures are taken through um fence slats as I'm not able to get in contact with Mr and Mr serson at times and this is in their backyard they have a random wagon there's some canoes that have been there and if you look along the fence line there's pallets this is also on the other side and I can only get to a certain angle but they have stuff around their pool as well the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony evidence presented in case number 2424 CB it is determined that the respondents Mark D and Vivian M Severson are the owner of record of property located at 3331 Alina Court located in Seal County as determined by the Property Appraiser's records in possession or control of the property and are in violation of the seal county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defined in 95.3 and it is further recommendation that the code enforcement board based on the findings of fact conclusions of Law and Order the code enforcement board issue an order constituting a lean in the amount of $7,500 for the 75 days of non-compliance from May 12th 2024 through and including July 25th 2024 at $1100 per day and the fine shall continue to acre at $100 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th 2024 the respondents must contact myself to arrange for an inspection of the property to verify compliance this concludes my presentation thank you any questions for user judges should I go I think I would address one at a time these are lean requests okay we're going to take these one at a time uh no no questions for the Auer U Mr Mrs uh serson Severson how do you pronounce I'm sorry s Severson thank you this is your opportunity to speak to this we have three other cases to follow but this is a request for Alene due to the fact uh of the days it was out of uh compliance and the request is for alen of $7,500 for the 75 days out of compliance that's what we're here for so we this is your opportunity folks well I am the living soul Mark Dennis Severson and this is the living consult Vivian M seers just to clarify this is uh all caps is indicative of the corporation we are not a corporation um I'm I'm looking at your flag and notice that it has a gold Fringe on it so is this Maritime Court I'm just trying to clarify what kind of this code enforce this is a administrative code enfor ment hearing is okay so do you have anything to say with regards to the County's request to lean your property for failing to comply within the time period uh I didn't even hear about the property being um I I didn't know if she had the right to go and Snoop around in my backyard I wasn't in your backyard sir well you're looking in my backyard that's called peeping peeping okay move on to the next case which is your 20 move on to the next case which is 2428 ceb all respondents were previously sworn go ahead inspector Tamar judges SEO County Sheriff's Office east region code enforcement for the record I am submitting a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk as exhibit one thank you this is case 2424 CB Mark D and Vivian M Severson the case I'm sorry this is this case is located at 3331 Alina Court Winter Park Florida the violation charge is unpermitted use my initial inspection was on 10:16 2023 the code board compliance date was 512 2024 follow-up inspection was yesterday at 724 2024 the results of the followup inspection the violation of occupying a camper remains on the subject property this was taken yesterday um on their street and as you can see the camper is popped open and there are piping and um things hooked up to the camper the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2428 CB it is determined that the respondents Mark D and Vivian M Severson are the owners of the record property located at 331 3331 excuse me Alina Court located in Seal County as determined by the Property Appraiser's records in possession or control of the property and are in violation of the seol County Land Development code Chapter 30 part 6 section 30102 uses permitted and it is further recommended by that the code enforcement board based on the findings of fact conclusions of Law and Order the code enforcement board issue in order constituting a lean in the amount of $7,500 for 75 days of not compliance from May 12th 2024 through and including July 25th 2024 at $100 per day and the fine shall continue to acrew at $100 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th 2024 the respondents must must contact myself to arrange an inspection of the property to verify compliance this concludes my presentation thank you any questions for user judges see n uh this is your opportunity to speak to this particular issue whether or not there should be a lean imposed and if not why not on this violation that we just saw if we could limit to that yes sir I believe I have a constitutional right to uh life liberty and pursuit of happiness uh I believe it's I'm being infringed upon by and that's part of the Constitution but it's all also predated because it's a god-given unable right and what she's telling me is I can't use my property for what I want to use it for and I don't know the Florida code or the Florida statute or Florida law that gives you the right to take my rights away and as I'm just challenging um the lawful uh right for her to take away my rights and then charge me for it all right moving on to item 2429 ceb same property same respondents all parties have previously been sworn go ahead inspector judge go ahead please Tamar judges seal County Sheriff's Office east region code enforcement for the record I'm submitting a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk as exhibit one thank you this is case 2429 CB respondents Mark D and Vivian M Severson the property is located at 3331 Alina cour Winter Park Florida and the violation charge is stagnant water in initial inspection was 1016 2023 code board compliance date 512 2024 follow-up inspection 724 2024 the result of the follow-up inspection the violation of stagnant or foul water remains on the property this was taken yesterday again through fence slots and you can see that the pool is still stagnant that's me zooming in the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2429 CB it is determined that the respondents Mark D and Vivan M Severson are the owner of record of property located at 3331 Alina Court located in seol County as the ter by the property appraisers records in possession or control of the property and are in violation of seal county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defined in 95.3 F the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the findings of fact conclusions of Law and Order the code enforcement board issue an order constituting a lean in the amount of $18,750 for the 75 days of non-compliance May 12th 2024 through the incl through and including July 25th 2024 at $250 per day and the fine shall continue to acre at $250 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th 2024 the respondents must contact myself to arrange for an inspection of the property to verify compliance um before I conclude my presentation um Mr Severson states that he does have a koi pond in the pool which I said is fine but the water does have to be clear so that God forbid a child or someone or something get back in there we can see it as soon as possible this concludes my presentation thank you any questions for AER judges officer if any of these cases has there been any progress on any of these cases any other questions thank you uh sver since this is your opportunity to speak to if there's nothing else you have to add that is specific to this lean request this is your opportunity she keeps calling it a pool it is a pond I looked it up in Black's Law Dictionary the definition of pond it fits it to a T I have an air raater in it so it's not stagnant it's that air raater runs 50% of the day every 15 minutes it's on and every 15 minutes it's off it's on a timer there's fish in it there's um plants in it um I it it leaks so I have to put water in it I put um well water into it so it's not stagnant I don't know the the fish would die I think if it was stagnant if there wasn't proper aeration in it and I don't know why she keeps insisting on calling it a pond or a pool if it's a pond and uh I think I think if you go through semal County you could probably find thousands of ponds that are you can't see the bottom the yard is fence the the patio is fenced um There Are No Children living there um okay I mean you could do this for every Blake pond in the whole County we understand your contention is it's it's a pond not a pool basically yeah it's a it's a pond and and fish poop you know and they dirty it I can clean it up spotless and in 24 hours it'll be cloudy in 48 hours you won't be able to see the bottom thank you Mr signning you look like you may have anybody have any questions no all right moving on to the last one 24th 30 same respondents all parties have previously been sworn tamaron judges suo County Sheriff's Office east region code enforcement for the record I am submitting a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk as exhibit one thank you this is case number 2430 ceb respondent Mark D and Vivian M Severson the violation is located at 3331 Alina Court Winter Park Florida violation charge uncultivated vegetation my initial inspection was on 1016 2024 code board compliance date 512 2024 followup inspection 724 2024 which was yesterday and the violation of uncultivated vegetation remains on the subject property these again were taken through fence slots and this is their backyard um the front yard is maintained however the backyard is not and you can see that it is well over 8 in the suggested recommendation by code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2430 CB it is determined that respondents Mark D and Vivian M Severson are the owners of record of property located at 3331 Alina Court located in SEO County as determined by the Property Appraiser's records in possession or control of the property and are in violation of the seal County chapter 95 section 95 .4 as defined in 95.3 B and it is further recommend recommended that the code enforcement board based on the findings of fact conclusion of law the code enforcement excuse me enforcement board issue an order constituting a lean in the amount of $3,750 for 75 days of non-compliance from May 12 2024 through and including July 25th 2024 at $50 per day and that the the fine shall continue to acrew at $50 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th 2024 the respondents must contact myself to arrange for an inspection of the property to verify compliance this concludes my presentation thank you any questions rer judges seeing none uh we'll take these one at a time I will say need to correct the date I think the initial inspection should show is 2023 instead of 2024 on the first slide yeah so we'll go back to 24-6 excuse me should we allow the respondent to speak on yes this is your opportunity similar to the other ones if you have anything to add on this particular uh request for aen uh when was the last picture taken yesterday and uh I don't know I mowed the lawn a few days ago I don't know what there is some um weeds up against the Florida room what used to be a Florida room before the SEO County sheriff and ATF set off a bomb in it now there's glass all over the yard so I don't mow right up to the edge of it because there's broken glass everywhere I don't want to scatter it all over um so yeah there there's there's some debris up close to the Florida room but uh I mow the rest of the lawn I mowed it several times in the past since I've been back I she she saw me on the 20th of May and uh we were unhooked from our RV for about 3 weeks and then I get a a thing in a mail that says that I'm am not compliant and they were charging me and I said well they're going to charge me I might as well hook it back up so um I I don't I don't agree with most everything here that I don't know what more you want me to do than mow the lawn there's there are a few weeds where I have wood she can after she you can get with her and she can clarify whatever you don't understand has been fixed but we've seen the pictures so we understand that you don't agree with it can I yes ma'am ma'am Miss did you oh I'm sorry go ahead so the picture on the left hand side if you're looking at your house Mr serson from the back is to the right that is the back right of your yard where your canoes and the pallets and everything are piled up the right is facing towards your pool area so what's wrong with the one on the right well it's over 8 in so once a property has been maintained it has to stay 8 in or it's over 8 in because I didn't use a weed ler to go around it rest of the lawn is mow um all right so unbelievable I think you're just looking for extra things to throw at me okay thank you uh I don't think you need to do them individually Mr chairman I think you could hear you've heard all four of them and make a determination just to recap we're going to take a vote on these all together uh it'll be 24-24 CB the recommendation was $7,500 for 75 days out of compliance fine would continue $100 a day until in compliance 24-28 CB recommendation is $7,500 lean as well $100 per day to continue as a fine 24-29 CB the recommendations is $18,750 uh for 75 days non-compliance at 250 a day and the uh fines will continue to recruit 250 a day for continued violations and 24-30 CB the final one recommendations lean for $3,750 for 75 days of non-compliance and the lean would continue at $50 per day that's the staff's recommendation do we have a just before we go to motion I just want to put it on the record that Ian we're already up to if this is approved today uh that' be about $38,000 somewhere in that neighborhood of leans on this house and you know just wanted to make sure everybody understood that before we move forward and I would like to ask the respond to just one question yes sir do you have any int you heard what everybody just said in the amount of the lean do you have any intention of working with the code enforcement officer to I understand how you feel but there's there there are rules do you have any intention of working with the coding for officer to correct these things I have been correcting things I I mowed the lawn uh I don't have a a weed whacker that's operating I mold it clear up to the edge of the fence um yeah I didn't get around that heart very close I meant on everything I I heard your arguments that she was wrong are you going to work with her on any of the things that she asked it's important because I want to know that before I vote on on on such an important matter if you're going to work with code enforcement or not my yard I used to keep it up very well my my health has been suffering for the last 10 years I do as much as as I can I work two or three hours a day and I'm exhausted I'm dealing with medical issues health issues and uh specifically cancer so I do what I can I used to keep my home immaculate my son I rented the house to my my son uh he's kind of a mess but he's my son and uh I can't always keep up with him cleaning up um so I'm I there's nobody that wants it more than I do to have a pond that is clear that was my uh um intention all along to have a a Clear Pond I'd like to see the fish but uh so far I haven't been able to do that I've had a lot of issues with the uh pool pump and other things um I I utilize the the RV probably about 4 to 6 hours a day we store food in there we eat in there and maybe watch a little TV but we live in the house I don't know I I keep it plugged in to store the food uh I think she she's being unreasonable I'm not hurting anything I'm not uh I don't believe that we're loud or annoying the neighbors or anything like that but if I want my food to not spoil I need it plugged in um yeah I'm doing the best I can but I you know like I said I can only do so much and I'm I'm exhausted I got to go rest I don't need I don't like to go in the house cuz my son has his friends over uh he doesn't and it's a tripping Hazard basically because of all his hobbies and stuff like that so anyway we just try to give him as much space as we can so I'm trying to I want the house to look nice too I want the yard to look nice too I want the pond to look nice too and I'm getting penalized that this kind of money that you're charging me I could maybe fix it up maybe I could do a lot of repairs and and and everything would be nice you know but instead of helping me out you're penalizing me you know you want me to be a good neighbor you know how they Define neighbor in the Bible a neighbor is someone who helps you not finds you ever hear the story about the Good Samaritan it was a guy who actually stopped and helped the guy that was beaten up and robbed that was the parable so you want to be a good neighbor you want me to be a good neighbor you be a good neighbor and quit finding me and quit finding fault with me I mve to re to accept the stat recommendation as is on all four second motion by Mr a by Miss Townson sus recommendation as present all four any other discussion all in favor say I I opposed motion carries uh so we have went with staff's recommendation uh the fines are going to continue to to acrew until you get the F the stuff fixed there but uh thank you for coming in and we hope for the best on that uh brings us to Ruby uh case number 24-36 CB Ruby Smith Jimmy Smith and Johnny day Jr 1257 Dew Street out to M Springs 32701 and Al sir there whenever you're ready sir could I get your name please Johnny D Jr thank you whenever you're ready El sir there yes sir Ruby Ruby and Jimmy Le they dead oh I'm sorry we'll give you a chance here a minute he's going to present the case code enforcement officer Cameron there s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 24-36 CB the respondents are Ruby and Jimmy Smith and Johnny day Jr like to present a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk as exhibit a violation is located at 1257 Dew Street SEMA County Florida the violation charge sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as to finding 95 3E abandoned junk Vehicles the initial inspection was on December 14th 2023 the code board order date was on June 7th 2024 and the follow-up inspections were on June 10th July 12th and July 24th 2024 results of the followup inspection the trunk abandoned vehicle violation remains excuse me so these are on the evanal inspection after um the code board it shows the vehicles are still there on June 10th this is the posting for the lean hearing on July 12th the vehicle still remain these are more photos of the other vehicles from July 12th this is yesterday's inspection July 24th uh the truck and the vehicle still remain and again more photos from yesterday inspection the other perspective of the vehicles the suggested recommendation by the co enforcement officer is based on testimony and evidence presented in case number 24-36 CB it is determined that the respondent Ruby and Jimmy Smith and Johnny day Jr are the owner of record of property located at 1257 deuse Street located in Sun County as determined by the property appraiser records are in possession of control of the property and are in violation of the sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as toine a 95.3 e it is further recommended that the code enforcement board based on the findings of fact conclusion of Law and Order and the code enforcement board issu in order constituting a lean in the amount of $3,200 for 63 days of non-compliance from April 26 2024 through an including June 27th 2024 at $50 per day and the vine shall continue to occur at $50 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after June 27th 2024 this concludes my presentation thank you uh could you clarify for me the the recommend recommended lean I've got 4,800 in my if I'm looking at the right page here my page 14 and then $100 a day you think you said $3,200 and $50 a day maybe no this is yes our you're correct that's what ours say yeah just I just want to know what oh my apologies yes that should be different it should be an order constituting the Leaning the amount of $4,800 okay for 48 days non-compliance from June 8th 2024 through including July 25th 2024 at $100 per day and the fine shall continue to acre at $100 per day for each day the violation continues or is repeated after July 25th thank you my apology no problem any questions for S aare how many vehicles are how many vehicles are there so I believe there's three and then that truck on the second picture to the right that's his daily driver that's not what I'm talking about um so it's the Corvette the yellow Corvette I don't know what the white car is that one in the smashed up truck any other questions thank you you're done with your okay um Mr day this is your opportunity to speak you heard the what we're doing here we're looking whether put a lean on it it's been here uh still in violation and uh sir the floor is yours so anything you have to share as far as why we should not be putting a lean on it at this time excuse me it's your chance to speak to this we're here due to the violations has brought us to the point where we're about to put a lean on the property because it hasn't been fixed yet uh and was found out a violation on the dates that he showed uh looks like December of last year so do you have anything to present you don't have to but this is your opportunity that would that you want to share with us well that truck there was mesed up okay I was driving down the road just just so we're clear I'm sorry don't mean cut you off I make sure certain time I get it out there couple weeks I have it all out I just been able to do it I no money to have nobody to come and get it so I had to go to work a couple weeks to make some money to get it out now I got the money I get it out of there okay so I'm not going to make a long story short okay okay so we're here uh again the request is for a $4,800 lean uh and then continue $100 a day he sounds like he's asking for 2 weeks to get it out of there the violation has already been found just so we're clear the fines have been running uh so you know we is this uh when we took this case up in May the respondent was not here correct do you recall H sir Hader I don't recall I believe that's correct I don't think anyone was here have you had any Communications from the point of you know finding him in violation from the point of the initial contact so after the initial hearing I think sometime in June don't remember the exact date I was actually stopped by Mr day waah parking lot and he said he was going to work to remove the truck and he was going to fix the Corvette so the Corvette is now on Jacks like lifted in the air but there's been no additional repairs Corvette is being fixed C that truck on the TR there that was that was fixed the Mercedes is going away and er Tru going away Mercedes that's my mom's called she died 2008 so I haven't read it they're just sitting there thank you any uh however this Situation's been going on since last December is that correct correct even longer okay any other questions or motion I move to accept the staff's recommendation second motion uh by Mr Ross second by Mr debate accept status recommendation as presented all in favor say I I oppos so that's what we've done sir the lean has been imposed uh you still need to work on fixing that stuff should be out this weekend okay well communicate with him when it's out and he can once you get to that point he can do a notice of in being in compliance thank you for coming in today and we wish you the best we're going to go back we had two uh two thank you sir two cases that came in is okay we'll start with uh actually it's the same respondent on page seven case number 2468 CB Carmen cologne and dami cologne uh Wells Fargo Bank Liz pendants 406 oando Drive alont Springs Florida 32714 if you're here for that case please step forward in the other case uh same respondent same uh same address 2469 CB it's on the next page and these will be AER aair again we'll be presenting these do you think we could take a break after these two cases then you have about six cases remaining when no respondents are present okay I'm sorry no it's okay I should be asking I'm a guy I actually got to go they need to get sworn in okay U folks whoever's going to be speaking if you could raise your right hand so we could swear you in uh our clerk here do you somly swear or affirm the testimony you're about to get is the church and your names please um Anna I'm her granddaughter okay what's her name Carman col col when everybody else right there code enforcement officer Cameron adir sem County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 2468 CB the respondents are Carmen cologne and Damie cologne like to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk is exhibit a the violation is located at 706 OK Lando Drive in sem County Florida the violation Charter sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defin a 95.3 a rubbish the inial inspection was on February 16th 2024 notices or respondents February 27th and October 12th correction February 27th and March 12th 2024 compliance states were March 12th 2024 and March 27th 2024 followup inspections were February 27th March 12th March 28th April 11th and yesterday July 24th 2024 right the results of followup inspection the violation the rubbish violation remains on the property this is on the initial inspection February 27th you can see the rubbish on the left hand side in the backyard and on the front yard and the porch this is 20 that was 20 2023 correction that should be 2024 this is a followup inspection on March 12th 2024 the rubbish remains on the side and on the porch followup inspection on March 28th there's been no change this is a follow-up inspection on April 11th 2024 the rubbish remains on the side in the porch and this is yesterday uh followup inspection you can see the rubbish there's more on the right hand side and the rubbish remains on the left and on the porch the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2468 CB it is determined that the respondents Carman cologne and D cologne are the owner of record property located at 706 of clo Drive located in s County as determined by the property appraiser records are in possession or control of the property and are in violation of sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as a 95.3 a rubbish it is further recommended that the Coe enforcement board issue an order for the respondents to correct the violation onor before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove the rubbish from the property if the respondent does not comply with the order a fine of $100 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation thank you any qu any questions for AER Adair see none uh this is your opportunity to speak to uh well did we have another case I'm sorry she has some pictures but dami um deceased about two or three years she passed away basically two or three years ago Dam Kum her daughter Dy okay and she got picture because when he went by she was trying to stop him to talk to him and he just drove off I know he just had to take pictures and move on but she wanted to talk to them but we have updated pictures from yesterday okay well can one moment the case he just presented that's what we're going to talk about now we're already into that so I'm let you go ahead as it relates to to this particular case what he just presented and then we'll hear the other one uh if you have anything you want to present you're not going to get it back it's it's going to have to be put into the record and so go ahead and I'm sorry start from that's up to dat until today and the furniture that there were there and everything I put it up in the storage with my fiance so and these pictures represent what and what day um that was literally from yesterday after he took the picture that he was showing from yesterday's day that was after the fact that he went by okay and you're trying to because what is it you're trying to establish with these pictures I see still see trash all over no she's working on it she's like like literally she's by herself my siblings try to help whenever they can I'm working I'm a single mom so I'm like taking a care of my son right now and working when I'm off I'm like literally helping her there she been in out the hospital for medical issues so I'm like the only one backing her up right now but if it needs to be done before the eth I will sign whatever to get it done before the eth to get it done because I'm the only one in my fiance that he's could be a witness as well that he's helping me as well to clean the house and the front and everything so you're good with the com the compliance date you're comfortable with that you see what the recommendation is is that she was wondering if until August 15 because she's getting the money to get more stuff out of the house but she needs like resource I just used my paycheck last week to just get everything out of until this day so I didn't even pay my stuff to help her out so 15 alista 15 of August I don't hear the second case Okay uh dare go ahead with the second case before we do this code enforcement officer Cameron Adair Sim County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 24- 69- CB the respondents are Carmen coloon and D coloon I would like to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation in the clerk is exhib day the violation is located at 706 OK Lando Drive sem County Florida the violation charge of s county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defin a 95.3 abandoned or junct Vehicles initial inspection February 16th 2024 notice to respondents were on February 27th and March 12th 2024 comping stes are set for March 12th 2024 and March 27th 2024 follow-up inspections were on February 27th March 12th March 28th April 11th and yesterday July 24th 2024 results of followup inspection the violation of abandoned or chunk vehicle remains on the subject property this was taken on my initial inspection on February 27th 2024 this is a follow-up inspection on March 28th 2024 and all these pictures the vehicles in the same location and operable flat tires and storage inside so this is yesterday's inspection July 24th 2024 the vehicle's in the same condition the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 24- 69-c B it is determined that the respondents Carmen cologne and D cologne are the owner of record of the property located at 76 oando Drive located in sem County as determined by the property appr appraiser records are in possession or control of the property and R in violation sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 s defined in 95.3 it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issue an order for the respondent to correct the violation honor before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove all inoperable vehicles or store them in an enclosed garage or permitted attached carport if respondent does not comply with the order a final $100 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation thank you questions officer d uh yes sir officer dare is that that vehicle's in the same position in that the photo is taken from a completely different angle has not moved any other questions El there sing now this is your chance we're talking about for the car is my car but my mom put a lot of stuff in there so I'm going to remove it from the property because once again I'm new to everything was going on that I used to live there that wasn't like that before so I would take an issue to remove this stuff because I've been looking around to get somebody to remove it but there's no um I don't have the key so they're looking for a key so as soon if it's to the eth or the 15 I will we Mo within those days uh so I'll ask you a quick question do you think August 8th 15th whether is realistic is I don't I want you to pick a realistic date we can for the 15 okay you know today is U today is the 25th and if we did a 30-day that's what I was thinking that's yeah then that would that would give them until the 2 I agree 5th so the motion well okay we're we have two of these just I'm sorry also I'd like to point out on this case that each one of these violations uh the staff is asking for $100 a day here so if this property does does not come into compliance you know within I mean I would say less than 120 days we're going to be talking about there's no way that this person would be able to to get out from under that level of lean so I just wanted to point that out before we move forward in fact I'll even make I'll even make a motion I don't know if you guys will be friendly to it but this is not a lean request just so you know this is a new case and it's whether to find them in violation or right but those fines will then come to us and if both violations exist okay so so I'll go ahead and move that we um accept the recommend recommendation of Staff except for I'd like to reduce the fines for each one of these to $50 a day instead of 100 with a compliance date of 30 days from today second it and you want August 25th to be the date we're talking about and I second his his motion on both of them okay uh okay so is there any discussion before we vote on this okay so the uh the motion is to accept ass recommendation however moving the compliance date to a August 25th in the fines on each one of these cases 2467 CB and 2469 CB would continue separately to run at $50 per day if they were still in violation that's the motion uh by Mr s and second by Mr Ross I believe correct and that's correct okay uh all in favor say I I all right I did oh I'm sorry I missed you okay uh okay so that's what we've done the the board has given you until the 25th of August as requested uh please get it done by then communicate with all I'm done but she was wondering like when she was trying to wait about him to talk to him I don't know how everything works I'm new with this like she wanted to ask him a couple question yesterday but he took off like she think it was disrespectful from his part from her being she's an older lady I don't know I'm just trying to translate I understand I can tell you I've never seen him be disrespectful for a second since he's been here but I'm sorry if that happened pick up a phone call him he's got and he'll give you his number before you leave here if you don't already have it thank you so much for coming in thanks for the work you've done we're going to take take a short break here 10 minutes yes please a 10 minute break it is uh what time is it y so we'll start 4:00 yes scar yeah we should [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] n [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] and the record is 401 all right we're going to start with three cases that are on page four and five the first one would be 24-48 CB property Scholars Investment Group LLC SBC startups reinforce res resourcing and Enterprises LLC is the registered agent the property 138 anchor Road Castleberry Florida 32707 and the next case we'll hear them all together since there's no one present 24- 49 CBS same Property Owners same property and then we also have 2463 C same property same Property Owners go ahead offer Adare code enforcement officer Cameron Adair s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 24-48 c the respondent is property Scholars Investment Group LLC and registered agent is SBC startups resourcing and Enterprises LLC going to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk has exhibited okay the violation is located at 138 anre Road Sim County Florida the violation Charter sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as to find a 95.3 B on cultivated vegetation initial inspection was on December 14th 2023 notice the respondents were on January 4th and January 18th 2024 compliance stes for January 18th and February 1st 2024 followup INSP ctions were January 18th February 1st July 12th and yesterday July 24th 2024 results of followup inspection the uncultivated vegetation violation remains on the property this is a photo from initial inspection when officer uh Henson inspected it you can show the or it shows the vegetation over 8 in this is my initial inspection on January 18th can you go back one slide I believe the date on that was incorrect 12424 in 20230 yes it should be want to make sure y'all correct those for record this is initial inspection by me on January 18th 2024 uh the vegetation still over 8 in this is an inspection by me on February 1st um the arrow in points to spots of vegetation that are over 8 in this the only photo I have from that day this is the date of posting on July 12th 2024 you can see the vegetation around the property still exceeds 8 in and this is yesterday's inspection uh it's the same thing vegetation around the property is 848 in the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based B on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 24-48 CB it is determined that the respondent property Scholars Investment Group LLC and registered agent SBC startup resourcing and Enterprises LLC are the owner of record for the property located at 138 anchor Road located sem County as determined by the property appraiser records are in possession or control of the property and R in violation of sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as to find a 95.3 B on cultivated vegetation it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issue an order for the respondent to correct the violation on or before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove all uncultivated vegetation over 8 in in height if the respondent does not comply with the order to a fine $50 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation any questions before we move on to the next case uh yes uh officer dare have you had any contact with this group and if so what were you able to find out about this I have not no um I can't speak for Shannon she is no longer in the room with us but she was able to or they called her sometime in between her initial inspection and when I took the case over and their plan was to demolish the building and that's the last point of contact that was sometime in January and the building is uninhabited I believe that's the next case I believe people are living in it oh any other questions go ahead to the next one voting code enforcement officer Cameron Dar s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 2449 CB the respondant are property Scholars Investment Group LLC and registered agent SPC startups resourcing and Enterprises LLC I'd like to submit a copy of this Power Point presentation to clerk is exibit day violation is located at 138 Anor Road semal County Florida the violation charge semal county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defin in 95.3 a rubbish initial inspection is December 14th 2023 notice to respondents January 4th and January 18th 2024 compliance stes January 18th and February 1st 2024 followup inspections January 18th February 1st July 12th and July 24th 2024 results the rubbish violation remains on the property so this is an initial inspection done by shanton and Hanson uh in the pictures you can see where the arrows indicate it's shingles from the roof that have fallen off and just remain there this is on December 14th 2023 this is my initial inspection on January 18th 2024 you can see the rubbish remains from the shingles on the left slide and in the towards the right of the property there's a shed with all that debris inside of it it's an open shed followup inspection on February 1st the shingles remain in the same spot and uh rubbish in the sheds remain the same this is date of posting on J July 12th the shingles remain in the same spot and in the shed there's a more clear picture the debris has changed this is also the posting from July 12th this is yesterday's inspection the shingles remain in the same condition same location and the shed has the same as July 12th the suggested recommendation by the coent enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2449 CB it is determined that the respondents property Scholars Investment Group LLC and registered agent SBC startups resourcing and Enterprises lsse are the owner of record of property located at 138 anchor Road located in Sim County as determined by the property appr appraiser records are in possession or control of the property and are in violation of s county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as to find a 95.3 a rubbish it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issue an order for the respondents to correct the violation honored before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove the rubbish from the property if there's fondant does not comply with the order a fine of $100 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation any questions uh officer D this is a a violation because the shed doesn't have a door if it if it had a door and what was inside would not be rubbish correct correct um but more so the shingles scattered across the property that's just one image in the same spot thank you any other questions before we move to the next case again this property is occupied or not I've never actually seen anyone in it but based on the debris in the shed and I know like a homeless population around the area I believe people are squatters that live in there there's easy access well the next slide we'll go into tomor go ahead continue to the last case 63 code enforcement officer Cameron today s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 24- 63- CB respondents our property scholar in Investment Group LLC and registered agent SBC startups resourcing and Enterprises LLC like to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to clerk as exibit EG the violation is located at 138 anchor Road semal County Florida the violation CH of simal county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as to find in section 95.3 C remains a rubble of a structure initial inspection December 14th 2023 notice the respond January 4th and January 18th 2024 compliance dates for January 18th and February 1st 2024 followup inspections January 18th February 1st July 12th and yesterday July 24th 2024 results of the inspection The Remains are Rubble of structure violation remains these are initial photos from officer Henson's initial inspection on December 14th 2023 you can see go back to you can see um on the left picture it is an open window looking into the house it's another open window uh smashed in and then from Shannon's case notes I can't speak on be her behalf but she saw the roof caving in this is my initial inspection on January 18th 2024 um the left picture is showing that the door hanger is still there and the window leading to the inside still open same results as the last inspection followup inspection on February 1st it zoomed in show the arrows pointing to that open window it's just a darker image harder to see this is from data posting July 12 2024 um that the left picture is in the back of the house showing the open entrance in the back and this is again the front window leading into the home these are the postings for July 12th 2024 and this is yesterday's inspection uh July 24th 2024 so the left slide is just a condition of the house to show you guys what state it's in and then the right one is that same window you can look all the way through see the light on the outside that's an opening in the door um so it's an entrance way through and through the suggested recommendation by the coup enforcement officer is based on testimony and evidence presented in the case number 2463 CB it is determined that the respondents property Scholars Investment Group LLC and registered agent SBC startups resourcing and Enterprises LSC are the owner of record of the property located at 138 anchor Road located in semal County as determined by the property appraiser record are in possession for control of the property and are in violation of semal county code chter 95 section 95.4 as defined in section 95.3 C it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issue an order for the respondent to correct the violation on or before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove repair or secure the remains or Rubble of a structure if the respondent does not comply with the order a fine of $100 will be imposed for each day the violation continu or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation any questions for anyone I was just wondering um how proactive you guys normally are on trying to find this type of respondent like sunbiz will usually have some type of contact in uh information on entities like this and then you posted the notice two weeks before I'm assuming you got no response at all from that correct did you did you try any other methods of trying to get in touch with these people I have not no besides the initial call but it is up to them to come contact me for compliance that's good that's what I want um I just have a quick question the structure of that building looks like it might be very unstable is would you consider that to be a hazard if there is people squatting in there is is the roof caving is is it would you consider it to be a dangerous condition at all I can't give advice on that okay no no further questions any want to deliberate we want to talk about uh what we look like we have three different cases we have a vegetation case where there's a $50 fine compliance all in the same compliance date of of August 8th um $50 for the vegetation $100 for both the rubbish and the rubble I'll be happy to make a motion that we accept staff recommendation in each of the three cases we've been presented here second so we have first by Mr s second by Mr Bates all in favor say I any opposed it passes so I think our next case is Edward sarapen and Frank Quine low 2466 CB following Page Six he got two cases oh there's two cases okay sorry and then the SEC and on page seven will be the second of of the cases same people Edward sarapin and Franken low 2467 cev officer there please code enforcement officer Cameron Adair s County Sheriff's Office South Region this is case number 2466 CB respondent are Edward sarapin and Frankin low I would like to submit a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to clerk is exhibit a the violation is located at 207 Grace Boulevard s County Florida the violation charge s county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defin a 95.3 B on cultivated vegetation initial inspection was on March 27th 2024 notice the respondents were April 3rd and April 18th 2024 compliance stes were April 17th and May 2nd 2024 fall followup inspections were April 3rd April 17th May 2nd July 12th and July 2020 July 24 2024 results of the followup inspection the uncultivated vegetation violation remains on the property these are photos from my initial inspection on March 27th 2024 can you go back to so on the left hand slide a majority of the next photos are going to be of the backyard in the pool shed this is taken from the neighboring property I can see over the fence to look at it so this was taken on followup inspection April 3rd 2024 you can see the front yard was cut cut but the backyard remains over 8 in this was taken on a followup inspection on April 17th the backyard Remains the Same this is taken uh April 18th the backyard Remains the Same what is that enclosure there with all the growth on top what is it it's a pool enclosure that's the next case so this was date of posting I was unable to see from the neighbor's yard he wasn't home at the time and I couldn't observe from any of the surrounding properties but you can see in the backyard on the left side through the fence the vegetation remains and scattered around the front yard vegetation remains this is the data posting and a closeup of the front yard this is yesterday's inspection uh July 24th 2024 the backyard remains in the same state uh severely overgrown along with the pool enclosure findes on top hold on when you say pool enclosure There's an actual pool underneath that thing correct okay the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2466 CB it is determined that the respondents Edward sarapin and Frank willin low are the owner of record of property located at 207 Grace Boulevard located in sem County as determined by the property of Razer records are in possession or control of the property and are in violation of SEL county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defining 95.3 be uncultivated vegetation it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issu an order for the respondents to correct the violation honored before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove all uncultivated vegetation over 8 in in height from the property if the respondent does not comply with the order a fine date of $50 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation any questions uh sir it does appear from the photographs uh that someone does live there is that correct correct have you had any contact with these owners and what was the result of those contacts I knocked on his door during the initial inspection but for safety concerns I did not speak with him I got back in my truck and left and and there's been no contact s okay any other questions let's move on to the next case no water allowed sir I I have a question I can't stand it I'm going to have to ask safety concern did he threaten you I there was no exchange of words he only creeped the door open about 2 in and wanted me to come closer thank you code enforcement officer Cameron ad s County Sheriff's Office South Region case number is 2467 CB respondent is Edward serpin and Frankin low would like to submit a copy of this PowerPoint Pres ation clerk as exhibit a the violation is located at 207 Grace Boulevard semal County Florida the violation charge of semal county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defined in 95.3 F stagnant water initial inspection was March 27th 2024 respond notice to respondents were April 3rd and April 18th 2024 the compliance stes were April 17 and uh May 2nd 2024 followup inspections were April 3rd April 17th May 2nd July 12th and yesterday July 24 2024 there was also followup inspection the stagnant or foul water violation remains on property this is a picture of the pool from the initial inspection on March 27th you can see the green water um with all the algae on top That was supposed to be this year 2024 not 2023 this is a follow-up inspection on April 3rd 2024 the pool remains in the same state followup inspection on April 17th 2024 you can still see the ouchy on top of the water this is from May 2nd 2024 pools Remains the Same this is data posting I was unable to get in the back or the neighboring backyard to see the pool that should have been a correct date of you go back that should have been yesterday's inspection date uh July 24th 2024 the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2467 CB it is determined that respondents Edward sarapin and frin low are the owner of record of property located at 207 Grace Boulevard located in s County as determined by the property appraiser records in are in possession or control of the property and are in violation of sem county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as def find at 95 95.3 f it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issue an order for the respondent to correct the violation honored before midnight August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondent must remove or clear the stagnant water from the pool if the respondent does not comply with the order a fine of $250 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance this concludes my presentation thank you any off any questions so what we have is two cases we have one for a vegetation violation with the compliance date of August 8th for $50 a day and a stagnant water one for with the same compliance date of August 8th with a $250 a day do I have any motions or any discussion I Mo the staff's recommendation in both cases I'll second that we have a a first and a second all in favor I any opposed none moot motion passes on both that's it okay he didn't mark it all right our next case is 2470 CB Joshua walls and so hang Chen 1904 Heathwood Drive Winter Park Florida 32792 officer judges tamaron judges SEO County Sheriff's Office east region code enforcement for the record I am submitting a copy of this PowerPoint presentation to the clerk as exhibit one this is case number 2470 CB responders Joshua walls and so K Chang the property the violation is is at property 1904 Heathwood Drive in Seal County Florida violation charged unsecured swimming pool my initial inspection was on March 28th 2024 notice to respondent March 29 2024 and 419 2024 compliance States 412 2024 and 53224 followup inspections 419 2024 59 2024 6 6 19 2024 and my latest inspection was yesterday on July 24th 2024 results of the followup inspection the violation of an unsecured pool remains on the subject property this picture was taken on March 28th of this year and as you can see the fence has been pushed down by the vines Shrubbery bushes so it does not make the pool secure this was on 419 I was not able to get on the subject property but The Neighbor Next Door let me in his backyard so this is coming looking at it from the neighbor's point of view on 619 I was not able to make contact with anyone in the home or the next door neighbor I did take a picture of this to show that um there was a new fence gate put up so I was thinking that maybe the whole fence had been taken or had been replaced however yesterday on July 24th 2024 when one of the tenants let me in the backyard as you can see the fence is still down in the pool is not secured the suggested recommendation by the code enforcement officer is based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2470 CB it is determined that the respondent Joshua walls and saken Cheng are the owner a record of the property located at 1904 Heathwood Drive located in seol County as determined by property appraisers records are in possession or control of the property and are in violation of seminal county code chapter 95 section 95.4 as defined in 95.3 G and it is further recommended that the code enforcement board issue an order for the respondents to correct the violation honored before midnight of August 8th 2024 in order to correct the violation the respondents must secure the pool by completely surrounding in it by a fence or barrier at least 48 in in height above the finished ground level measured on the side of the barrier away from the pool and where the grass excuse me and where the gates and doors in such barriers are self-closing and self-latching and where the release mechanism is located on the pool side of the gate if the respondents do not comply in the order a fine of $250 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance the respondent must contact myself in order to arrange an inspection of the property to verify compliance this concludes my presentation so is it being rented or do the respondents live there um it is being rented the um owner of the property did leave me a message stating that he was going to get the pool secured and that is what he did he put a gate on there which the gate was fine but did not secure the back area and you have so obviously you've been in communication with the owner yes can you can you tell me when you contacted did you contact him after like he contacted you and said he was going to secure it did have you spoken with him since after my initial inspection seeing that obviously there was a violation I made a phone call the owners actually live it's either Oregon or Washington but it's on the west coast left him a voicemail he called me back they were on vacation and said he would have it taken care of and I have not spoken to him since okay any other questions any discussion then I need a motion motion to accept staff's recommendation second we have a motion by Miss Townsen second by Mr Bates all in favor I I any opposed motion carries and then we have one more all right think you're done oh these what about these two yes and do we have to approve minutes no there were actually some additional changes that needed to be made so they'll bring them next month okay and then just make sure everyone's got August 22nd 2024 on your calendar and that's it and then I just need a motion to adjourn unless you want to stay here a little bit longer okay all in favor I thank you everybody [Music] d oh