e e e e e [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] enforcement board is now called to order if everyone to please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all Mr Hua ladies and gentlemen wait for her to wait for them I'll start my Spiel right there we get her case number H and silent and Silent mic's On's on ph silent it's the very first okay she just giving him the order all right let's start over again ladies and gentlemen the Municipal Code Enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether an alleged violation of the city code has occurred decisions made by this quasi judicial board will be based on the evidence and facts presented this evening our meetings are conducted in accordance with Robert's Rules of Order and each case will begin with the city presenting its evidence of the alleged violation the respondent will then present his or her case both parties will have an opportunity to cross-examine all Witnesses the board members May question any witness comments by both parties must be relevant to the case persons wishing to speak will be given an opportunity to do so by the chair and must address the board from the podium after giving their name and address upon request copies of material submitted by staff are available for review board members are reminded to obtain permission to speak from the chair and questions of the city should be directed to the attorney for the city this time I'd like to ask all persons who expect to give testimony tonight to please stand and be sworn in by the city park okay do you spare or affirm the testimony you about to give is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth thank you as part our standard operating procedures we will be taking cases out of order tonight let me give you those before we move on our first two cases will be under old business first one will be 23- 4652 second one will be 24- 0448 following that new business case number 24- 0556 then case 23- 6292 and then we'll um finish up the new cases all right expart Communications this time I'd like to ask any board members that have had any expart Communications regarding any matters coming before this code enforcement board this evening if you've had verbal communication please disclose the sum and substance of those Communications when and where the communications occurred and with whom it occurred if you received any written Communications please disclose the nature of the communications provide a copy to the city clerk to be fil in the record was you one yeah I've got none I've had none I've had none I've had none I've had none very good thank you approval minutes assumably everybody's had a chance to review the minutes from April 10th 2024 if there's no additions changes or Corrections I'll entertain motion to approve motion to approve second motion is second all those in favor I opposed no Nays motion carries okay on to our first case first case is case number 23- 4652 David City versus David J coun for the property located at 5106 Rolling Hill Court the deadline for compliances tonight at midnight Mr chairman board members Lorie Smith Cod compliance this case was presented back in March uh to the board and was granted in a two- months extension uh Mr Graham the contractor for Mr Calhoun is here this evening and would like to address the board sir please all right you name and address please uh my name is Graham Keith and the address that I'm representing in this case is going to be 5106 Rolling Hill Court so um before you get started you have um permission to represent the property yes I do and he said I can call him if need be if you guys need for a recorded statement or anything okay Mr chair just so you know we are trying to work in uh authorizations that'll help with this going forward um we are aware that Mr Calhoun did authorize him verbally to do so very good let you know just in the future we'll have that covered better I knew you'd be on it close your sir all right so I Mr Calhoun is actually a longtime family friend of ours had no idea he was in the situation that he was in met with him during this last meeting found out he had a tarp on the roof the day after it was March 13th I believe March 14th I met with him we filed the claim together with his insurance company two weeks after that insurance came out did an inspection the roof has been approved as of last week we should be receiving a check from the insurance company tomorrow maybe next week as soon as we receive the check takes my company 5 to 10 business days to order materials and we're stalling the roof in one day so essentially in about 2 weeks roof's going to be brand new there's no longer going to be a hole there will no longer be a need for the tarp the issue should be resolved in about two weeks time okay and you have and you have no there's no supply chain issues with getting materials okay um Tom does the city have a problem with u a one additional month extension no okay any questions for the respondent they assume you you you're here to get another 30-day extension yes sir okay why don't you say that I ask why don't you ask me for a thir 30day extension what we're asking for is we can have a 30-day extension thank you thank you sir okay um so what you have before you is a request for a 30-day extension um if there's no if there's no others request no other questions for the respondent I'll entertain a motion all right well I I move to extend 30 days okay we have a motion do we have a second second motion okay why don't you uh can you break out your calendar and and and um do a date certain 30 days until what is it June 12th okay so we motion to extend the uh the case until June 12th do we have a second second he seconded okay is there any further discussion see none all those in favor all right opposed no Nays motion carries hopefully we won't see you again and we'll have it all done okay so you did you you just now received an extension to June 12th all right thank you guys very much you're welcome next case please Cas is 24- 0448 City versus Gregory and Carmen Keith for the property located at 307 J Road the deadline for compliance is tonight at midnight Doug Allen co-compliance officer uh this is the exact same thing that grahe just had only this time it's his parents house and they are hoping to get an extension 30-day I assume a 30-day extension to hopefully get their roof issue resolved which is unfortunately for them been dragging on aot long time okay all right just just keep the record clean state your name and address again got you my name is Graham Keith and in this one I'm representing 307 Dru at Hills Road um same situation this one we filed the claim May 5th of last year unfortunately their insurance company has not been complying with us last time we were here we were told there's going to be a resolution within 30 days so we had asked for a 60-day extension Unfortunately they decided to drop the ball they're no longer communicating with us we had to hire an Umpire in the situation um we're told it should be resolved within the next month in this case we're asking if we can have another 30-day extension and we you know that's that's what we're waiting on okay any questions for the respondent I yes you you're not you're not certain in one month is going to be we already you know there's 60 and now and asking another month you're not certain they're going to respond at all or correct and this situation legally insurance has 90 days to respond last time we were here we were it was the 60-day mark within 60 days they haven't given us any kind of change in situation at all so by the end of the 90 days they have to do something we're hoping that they're going to you know understand you know their position knowing that it's about to be 90 days and respond soon but we don't know but they have to do something in 90 days does the city have a any objection to it a bit hesitant to approve this because this has been going on for quite a period time since May of last year apparently yes and even I think more than that so my opinion this evening would be I'll Grant it another 30 days but we got to we got to come to a a situation where it's it's got to come to an end I mean understood okay so that's my okay I'll I'll prove 30 days okay an option that we can do as well is we can move the tarp back to where it's not visually seen from the road if that helps cuz basically there's a leak in the master bedroom that's the whole reason there's a tarp there okay well hopefully it doesn't come to that top is not the violation it's the damaged shingles that are the violation the top notifies us that there's moisture going into that structure right that's the violation not the top but but I think what he's saying is if if it can't Le he's offering a a option that doesn't offend people driving by I guess right so but I get it that that just so you understand that it's the tarp itself is not the the violation the damage shingles aren't visual at all I mean you can't you you have no idea being visual not visual is not the point the point is that there there's damaged shingles and that's that's the violation until till those singles are no longer damaged there's a violation there interesting okay okay I I have a question uh for uh Tom it's a lot of damage shingles a lot of I I don't know how much damage to the shingles but if you have a top on your roof that indicates that there's moisture going into that structure that's why the people put a top there yeah so I don't know what the damage is to the shingles do you have any assessment yeah yeah so there's one little area where a shingle is coming loose over the master bedroom and it's allowing water to come in so it's one shingle that's loose you can't you'd have no idea unless you went up to it and physically picked up the shingle so visually there's no sign the only reason we know it's damage is because the assessment we did determined that that's where the water is coming in from what's the square footage of changing just the that area 100 square ft 100 square ft you don't have to get a permit or anything right right I mean yeah we we could change it but essentially we're waiting for insurance to pay for this project because if not my mom's coming out of pocket unfortunately in this case she can't afford to do so which is why we're going through insurance is it so does it require we yes okay yes and that's just based on time and age and per determination any uh you said that you've asked for an Umpire in this the attorney in the matter has yes okay and how long does that process take because right now I think you're count hoping that the insurance company will sign off within that 90 days but if they don't and you have an have to go to an ire how long is that processed I personally don't know um that that'd being a question for our attorney and unfortunately she's not here tonight I mean I could call if you have to come back again next week or next month in request then I would suggest you have that information for the board if you're going to the Umpire process understood any other questions I was just going to say getting an Umpire can take another 60 days is that's what I deal with on a daily basis so right so we have a request in front of you for a 30-day extension um if there's no other questions I'll entertain a motion I'll do that in case number 24448 I move that the city Grant a 30-day extension till June 12th 2024 we have a motion do we have a second a second motion a second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I opposed no nay motion carries okay so you've been granted an extension to June 12th in this particular case if if you need more time uh we'll see you in June um and you can ask for another extension there's never a guarantee that you'll get one but there's always a guarantee that you allowed to ask understood okay guys thank you thank you very much good luck all right thank you guys next case please it's going to be case 24- 0556 City versin Beck and Junia Kadar for the property located at 5106 East 122nd Avenue the case is before the board based on alleged repeat violation of section 10-4 B4 nuisance building the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance director Tom Bron the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served good evening Tom brone Code Compliance this case this evening is a repeat violation case that was originally presented to the code board back on April 12th 2023 by inspector Lorie Smith in case number 22-1 1311 where the respondent was found in violation of section 10-4 nuisance buildings the board gave the respondent 30 days to bring the violation into compliance or a fine of $25 per day would Ur on May 11 2023 the violation did come into compliance on August 1st 2023 where the respondent was granted two months extension from the code board at the end of January 2024 I spoke to the building official Dallas fos pertaining to the property about the progress of the construction of this the progress of the construction of this structure that was damaged by a house fire back in 2019 as of today the respondent has two open permits a residential renovation and aition permit that was obtained on February 9th 2024 as of today there has been no inspection scheduled following that discussion with Mr fos and I other and I re reive other neighbor complaints I prepared a repeat violation notice on February 7th 2024 where I posted the notice at the front gate of the property and requested copies to be sent out certified in first class mail I also request a copy to be posted at City Hall for the 10-day requirement at this time I'd like to submit photographic evidence that was taken by May on April 22nd and April 30th of 2024 exhibit number one shows the partially constructed structure exhibit number two shows the west side of the structure exhibit number three shows the posing of the notice hearing at the front gate and exhibit number four is the ordering case number 22- 11113 1311 I'm sorry thank you I'll submit yes thank you we accept doing anything not coming up so Mr chairman the city has been very sympathetic to the loss of the structure due to fire however this structure needs to be rebuilt and as I've received three complaints from the neighbors they're all frustrated because of them looking at this partially constructed property which you'll see um it's becoming a nuisance to the the neighborhood and the value the concern about the value they're concerned about it's been four years and nothing has been done so the the owner has been pulling permits and she obtains permits but then she let allows them to expire after six months so we felt as though once she pulls a permit we trying to back off a little bit as far as but I mean it's four years later 5 years later and we're still as you could see there's nothing really done to bring it in compliance that the structure has to the work has to be completed is that right well I mean I I I'd like to see cind the blocks put up some progress some yeah it's got to be at least some some substantial progress okay any questions for any questions for so I'm a little confused on how the property was was brought into compliance the for the previous VI the yeah previous violation I guess because back in that case uh she pulled some permits um and then then there was an inspection by the building official okay and we kind of thought we were going in the right direction so we kind of put the property in compliance however everything just she just sits on the permit and lets it expire and then nothing else is done so that's I mean the the photos are what you're going to see tonight are the photos of the property today there's two exterior walls and that's it and the foundation go ahead Rod yeah um it's close to his question but I uh I don't understand clearly how it became repeated violation I know they came and and did something and they stopped again and within 6 months right five years five years oh five years they can oh yeah oh okay so there was some work like I said when Lori presented this case back in 23 there was a permit pulled and then all of a sudden there was work a little work done and then we did put the property in compliance because we were trying to be that the uh the owners are they have been communicating with you or yes y what's their point of view I I can't speak for them honestly but here they're right here but I I I mean they've been great to us I mean we've had good dialogue but as far as code enforcement we need to have this structure built I mean it's not fair to the neighbors to sit there and look at a vacant lot that's partially uh constructed uh for four or five years it's just like I said I'm with trying to be uh good you know to them Partners yeah so this is also the place of the kangaroos that's how how do they not have a house but they can house kangaroos they have a State permit well that it me it makes no sense to me that you can have kangaroos that hop around and makeo but we're not talking about the kangaroos I know but like this is not the forum for that wasn't there a oh sorry I'm just saying it's it's build a house you told about apples and orange it's that's tonight that's not the form that we that's my opinion wasn't there some issue with the electricity I mean maybe I'm pole you can see the temporary pole that's put there so that's already been that's been resolved it's only there's only a poll there that's it no hookup to it that's what I thought the problem was that was T was Tico was supposed to come out and meter it but that hasn't happened there's a poll there 4x4 wood po so we don't know why to Electric to it but we don't know why too hasn't proceeded with this you have to pay you have to pay for that service here you can ask them yeah I I get I'm just I wasn't trying to Ernie do you want to say something yeah real quick sure um because this is a repeat violation normally you've had repeat violation cases before but normally they've been in the area of parking on an unapproved surface or inoperable motor vehicle on the property and there's only been some like finite number of days four or five and you've done that this is a different this is this being a repeat violation in this type of sense where it's a continuing violation that just wanted to make you aware that you have the option if you find it to be a repeat violation of normally you have fines up to $250 a day but because if you find it's a repeat it'll be fines up to $500 a day and also you have the option of having the fin start when the code enforcement officer observe the repeat violation again that's an option we're not saying you have to but knowing that if we're presenting a repeat violation I wanted you to know and I wanted the uh respondents to know too just for record hang on put the record time when what's that date February 7th that's the of this year that's the day I prepared to repeat violation so it's three months two months okay I'm so you had a question I just in Pre in most of the previous uh U repeat violations the the property has been in compliance it's a lot of times it's parking by so in this case it's not in compliance so in this case we would we could continue with a f with a daily f if we wanted yes could that's why I want you want to answer any questions you might have on that because these don't come to you in this form often it's a it's barely a show he saw the pictures yeah I got got I got I got the pictur else what was the everybody's okay yeah we got if we may bring you back up but for now we're Good Ju had a question Juan you have a question for Tom what was the previous fine there was no previous fine okay uh she came in front of the board two for two months requested an an extension and we finally put the property in compliance so there was no F name and address please Junior ramire scar 5106 Isa and 22nd Avenue Temple terce Florida 33617 floor is yours uh good afternoon I'm sorry I have to go back after I've been coming here um one one thing that I want to say I don't know if he mention it uh when the house got on fire we went in the owner and I explained that to him after several years we managed to re refinance oh not refinance like getting a mortgage and then getting a house on our name and I explain him that how how you want me to pay for a or start a process with a remodeling when the house is not mine and only after then I start moving forward hiring um like a person to do the plans cuz it's our first time we still kind of new with all this stuff and then back on whatever what he was saying that I'm pulling a permits I'm not pulling no permits I have a contractor who is the one who doing that I I don't do anything because I'm not HED so everything I have to wait for other people to do it so I I don't pull no permits um I don't know why he said that before it wasn't compliant and now it's in compliant the reason that he's taking me here is because the house is not being built so as long as the house is not built I'm not in compliant and I understand I I told him since I we got the mortgage that when we got the houses in our name we pay two 2,000 plus every month for the house been sitting there plus whatever we live we cannot live there so it is very very important to us to finish it quick as soon as possible cuz we wasting money we've been having a like a financial hard ship and it's very embarrassing to say but you know and then after the Last Stand Out we were here the stuff didn't come out the way we we thought it would be you know we we thought we already would be leaving in the house so whenever he took the picture that he said that inspector on April um is is that the pictures when the foundation happened when the remember I I tell you that they just put the foundation the whole Foundation like the picture that dis this Monday you could VI picture guys but this when was this picture it was just just recently just this like three days ago or more than that there's the photos that was that's April yeah right now there is more job done I'm so sorry we we were in Georgia working and I I I I barely had time to take a shower and then come fast because I didn't want to miss this so I spoke to him he's aware that this Monday like two days ago they already pour the whole Foundation inside the concrete inside uh when this uh when this was taken I believe the it is it is what it was been done in here it was the whole inground pl plumbing and then the whole uh I don't know the specific name but whenever you put the blocks uh all around the perimeter with the rebars and and after that you know inspections and the last the last time the Dallas was there for an inspection it was to inspect also the termite which uh you know is also you know processed Dallas inspect the termite back when the kanguru got out by on February so after that he said that after we got the permit we didn't get no inspection this is incorrect because we did got an inspection what that's when Dallas came with the other group of um over there to inspect the the spray of the termite the paper the the yellow paper that we keep over there so it it was an inspection pool so after that the next step because uh the the plumber had to go back couple times to kind of like check on something on on the pipes so that's what the concrete it wasn't poor before but then already is pour everywhere the concrete uh this Monday I'm so sorry I don't have pictures but he he's aware I text him um and then I spoke to my contractor this uh next week they supposed to already start with the blocks uh they already order all the the Tres um I mean I understand th is in the warehouse uh yeah the Dres in the warehouse I understand you know I wish that would be something I I would be I I wish I could be magic and then I could like just build a house like like that so about the inspections the last inspection that we have is the like I said the thermite there is no inspection until the blocks are up I spoke to my contractor cuz and I I'm trying to be aware of the processing so I know just because he don't see no inspection call in it doesn't mean that it's nothing going on it's just there is no more inspection not even after the concrete is poor then there no more inspection until the blocks they go all the way up and then they call the next inspection but then my contractor say that next week he's supposed to already and putting blocks up doesn't really take that long it takes probably like I don't know a couple days to put the whole block you said you had the trust is sitting in a warehouse uh order yeah do you have do you have any kind of I mean purchase order or ticket or something I can get that from my contractor like I say I cannot do anything I cannot do anything I know where it's a waterhous when it's materials over there how do you know it's in the warehouse because my contractor tell me and who is your contractor Aline um I like Gonzalez I mean he live in Sami he don't speak Spanish his wife is the one that you know speak I'm so so he don't speak English so I mean his wife is the one who you know do all the paperwork honest with you you know with my uh you know like love money to do all this stuff you know it's you know he's been working with me with all this stuff which you know I really appreciate it you know I have to like change contractor before because one of the contractor like I said like I spent you before uh it's very hard to find contractors that they you know they want to they're willing to work with temps but then you know he's being anything else you want us to know um and you guys have any any other question that as far as I can I um I don't think go ahead R then then Bill and then you I just wanted to ask you is your contractor licensed in the city of timle Terrace oh yeah yeah yeah he's registered with this yes yes yes he had to go through all that yes uh now I just wanted to be clear about what uh Tom said uh what's the story of the permits they just run out and they expire that's that's a big problem too so I know I know but I we really didn't have the money to do forward that's the finance of the project is the problem is not the contractor being there or uh the first contract that we had uh actually I mean we wasn't really getting nowhere with him so that's why we also have to go redo all the paperwork that is that on the city when we we change contract on second contractor yeah that's our second contractor so he's the one that you know he's been very patient with us uh you know like MoneyWise construction wise and uh yes like I said because this uh temp work different than in any other City he explain me that like he he PID for example like we didn't even know let's say for example uh you pay uh for for the permits like like he cannot pay with everybody's you know every single different like like mechanical electrical they have to go in person so he always telling me that it's a hard time have to like texting everybody make sure and then some some even tell them like yeah yeah we already went and pick up the permit and then I just find out whenever I called the building department no long ago that no um you know mechanical is not ready you know but and I explained the lady like that is not even a like there's not even walls over there so yeah money wasted too do you have a construction loan because we already got yeah we we already has we we got a loan which is going to help us forward so it should be faster now but you know like I said we have a I have some family you know I have family in Cuba then you know they're not doing so well so but I know this is G nothing to do with that I know like he said the neighbors don't you know don't want to look at empty lot I understand uh like I said we've been I can I can I can go to my bank account and I can pull out every month I to explain to you if it was empty that would have been different but that's I know I know it doesn't look good believe me it doesn't look good it's a waste of money every month every month I can I can get the statements every month I pay money for that house I can prove you I can prove you that every month every month I pay money for the house understand Bill yeah I just was curious so the the the fire happened four to five 5 years ago so when when did you guys actually purchase the house how long it's in the system or like like at least like two years after or something like that February of 24 you on the house on the February 24th February of 2024 this year oh yeah yeah yeah more more yeah yeah yes yes okay so but not right when not right when the fire happened I explain him and have you resolve just go ahead you resolved the uh the issue with getting uh electricity to the lot to the to the to the lot have you that's a funny question and I think we were talking about before uh because um and I'm glad the Dallas is here the thing is is tricky because this is not new construction this is only renovation they do not allow me uh electric pole they they they didn't they don't give me any inspection for electric pole be only only new construction the city of temperas will allow an inspection of electric Pole so I kind of wasted time on that 4x4 with the electrical setup that is in there too because you guys not going to give me an inspection because you know I have to go to too to figure it out you know we've been using uh generators but it's funny yeah because it's a a specific renovation and no a new construction you guys not going to give me any inspection for a pole pole inspection so that's what we been using generators and then Dallas is here he knows for new construction only you guys put the inspection on the post and after the inspection that's the only way that I can I'd like to hear from Dallas yeah in a minute so as of right now there's no electricity out there well generators generators okay yeah Brian do you have evidence that you've actually the trusses are in a warehouse do you have evidence already well I just in general because it doesn't seem like you have anything and it's been years well we've been telling you what we've been told by our uh yeah but I can hang on if you're going to speak I need to I'm sorry yeah no I'm just I understand but I mean like can you submit anything into evidence I'll trust that a lot more hang on a second we'll get there in a minute um if there's no any other questions you guys can have a seat okay uh either Dallas Endor Tom um go too far don't go too far yeah uh Dallas Endor Tom I like Dallas to come up and answer the question as far as the poll yes let's ask him that but then I have questions for probably for you okay Dallas FIB builing ficient the they have a temporary poll on site we can issue a temporary or electrical release for that power to get power on the site okay however at this time the electrical permit was issued a while ago so it has expired so you just have to renew that get the inspection for the temporary pole we can get power turned on on the site the current permits less they're good I believe till roughly August I think February was the inspection get 180 days so the other two permits that are active or good until August the building permit and mechanical okay so the electrical one has exped has expired so even if they were to do work come in and renew they got renew it contractor can renew it and get it back and get the tle okay energized so they have power on site okay thanks Tom yes sir question for you um if if they were to provide proof that the block Mason's coming out and he's going to be put and block up and provide proof that they actually have these trusses sitting in a warehouse somewhere ready to be set would that satisfy you as far as progress uh I'd rather see the blocks installed okay and then then allow them to come for a lean reduction okay and then we can take that into consideration uh I but I at this point this is like I said this has been going on for years and I think I'd rather see cinder blocks put up maybe some trust and then we could put it in compliance okay I thought you said there were cinder blocks that had been no no no the concrete's been installed and the stub up for the plumbing is done foundation and he said the the the block guy was coming out shortly BL and it should only take a couple days that's what she said okay um okay if there's no other questions for anybody for for Tom just one last what what do you mean by Le lean reduction what well there' be there's going to be an acre lean then a fine and then there's a lean on the property the respondent has the right to ask for a lean reduction so let's say the lean is the fine is $10,000 we can it'll be an application filled out by the respond and then Ernie gets it and then he reviews it and then we can we reduce the lean to a substantial they do have they do have now I no no no no no no no no as remember when I came up earlier talked about the fact that this was a repeat violation you have the option if you want instead of like your normal cases where you would say 30 days to come into compliance or a fine will start you can actually if you choose to do it start a fine from the date that was that the uh repeat violation was observed which is Fe code officer so in other words back you you can have a fine start from February 27th February 7th February 7 February 7th that's a choice I'm not telling you have to do that I'm saying that's your option I'm trying to avoid that Ernie understood but you were asking about the lean hang on hang on we're not there yet okay let's hear about your thoughts later to avoid that though um um so if there's no other questions for the respondents or for the city I will entertain a motion I have a question for the respond hang on a second can you come back up to satisfy some of the board members uh is it possible that you could obtain a list from your contractor a purchase order from your contractor of the materials that's being stored I'm sure yeah I'm sure it had to be it would have to have some type of yes yes yes I'm sure uh I also want you to guys to understand that my contractor doesn't only have my house to take care of it you know he always he also has other stuff so he also you know sometimes uh you know he you know he needs to work on other stuff finish or something and then come over you know but yes I'm sure I'm sure I'm positive that he you know I believe you mentioned his wife supports him yes his wife is the one that you know I mean they actually even one time offered me if they wanted me to come over here cuz because they're the one who know more about me they I'm positive they can't even you know say more than I can but yes um it had to be because yes yes absolutely 100% how do how do we go by that I was say hang on slow down one at a time okay that's not our job okay that they can't obviously they're not going to be able to produce it tonight right but you can take that into cons take all the facts into consideration when you make your motion Brian I was going to say if we could get that within like two weeks that I I would think that should be but however you you also heard that the city's position is that's all well and good if they produce that but he wants to see some real progress he wants to see the blocks up he wants to see the trust is set I agree I I 100% agree with that no matter what the block I I'm just saying I think she can only do so much to get her contractor to okay again you we're not there yet but I'll hear your thoughts after we make the motion sure is there any other questions one last question for uh Tom how many how many complaints you have how many I have three complaints it's only surrounding neighbors yeah yeah almost everybody around and whenever we have a violation in that near vicinity the first thing they'll say is you allow that structure to be the way it is with that property but you're gonna bother me about my trailer in the driveway yep that's very com that's very common pressure is that a complaint no but that's just the make me aware of what's going on on our location okay mayam you can have a seat thank you so if there's no other questions I'll entertain a motion I'll attempt that okay thank you in case number 24- 0556 I move that the city has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Temple Terrace City Cod right there following repeat violation you got to go to the repeat got do the repeat yeah it's well you said violation you didn't say repeat yes uh the evidence the following violation oh I have to say repeat oh okay it's not in the there is no there is a there is a repeat there is a repeat ordinance he's he's reading it correct I'm reading it oh you are reading okay I think it's later on oh okay my mistake start again yeah in case number 24- 0556 I move that the city has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Tim ter city code exist on the property located at 5106 East 122nd Avenue with the appable code violation uh section Cas section uh 10-4 subsection B subsection 4 this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer Tom Boni along with other evidence including photos affidavit and the notice of violation of all uh of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that the respondent be found to be a rebeat violator as defined by city code section 1-63 because the respondent has been found to have violated the same provision of the city code within the previous 5 years regardless of the property address if F uh I further move that the daily fine be assessed for the repeat violations from the time of the notice of repeat violation until the time the repeat violations are corrected upon considering the following factors the gravity of the vi violation any actions taken by the Violator to correct the violation any previous violations committed by The Violator um I I move that the fine be um $25 per day we have a motion do we have a second I'll seconded just to open up the floor for discuss Motion in a second any further discussion yeah one at a time please the uh the um the question is I did not want to go back but the the repeat violator we have these are just guidelines you you have you have the option you could have given them 30 days or or you can go back to February 7th okay I I want to give him 30 days uh how do I do that there's no well then you just change it to I'm going to give them until don't read it well hang on one at a time the way to do it is you tell me that you'd like to revise your motion I I like to revise my motion okay because I whoever second at the first motion no no you don't it's not time second I got I got a second you guys got to stop pulling the trigger so fast okay wait for me to direct you okay once he makes the motion whoever made the second the first time will need to Second the new motion okay so what's your revision my revision would would be I don't want to go back to February to start any I just want a new motion yeah I just the the new motion so it's where do I insert that it's at the end where it says febr where it says the daily fine be assessed daily fine be assessed Ernie go ahead it just might be easier if you're not are you looking to make uh are you also at the same time wanting to find this to be a repeat violation well it it is it is beat violation you know I I trust Tom you know and and and that but I I don't want to go back to you know I want to give them one more last chance of 30 days to prove and to continue and get the list and do all that it seems to me you know I would suggest then you read the if you want to go that route you read the normal the normal exist at the end if you want you know once you're done with that if you want to find it to be a repeat violation regardless and you can just make kind of make that finding statement of that it's a repeat violation but on on the other hand looks like you want to give him a deadline so I think I think we would just move forward with a just your normal violation and then at the end if you want to make it clear that you do find this to be a repeat Just for future purposes yeah um with Toms except another 30-day to give them one last chance it's your you're the board member yes it's your decision what you want to decide then uh do I have to re read the new read you have to read the motion like he said use the regular motion but make sure that you include in there somewhere yes it's going to violation okay all right in case number 24- 0556 I move that the city has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Temple Terrace city code exist on the property located at 5106 east1 122nd Avenue with the aable code violation section uh 10-4 subsection B subsection 4 this motion is based on the swor testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer Tom Baroni along with any other evidence including photos Avid David and the notice of violation of which received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that the said violation is a reated violation and should be corrected on or before June 12th 2024 if the respondant does not comply with this order on or before the day they order to pay a fine for each and every day the violation continue past the date sit for compliance upon considering the following factors is the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the Violator to correct the violation any previous violations committed by The Violator I move that the fine be $25 per day we have a motion we have a second a second motion a second before we get into deliberations I want the record to show that the original motion made by Rod has died for lack of approval by the board okay any further discussion I think $25 a day is not enough I think this has been going on for years and um there's I understand there's Financial constraints but at the same time work has to happen either demolish it make it a clear empty lot or do something I I don't I don't think that the um the this this fine would be starting June you know no matter what you put I you could put $100 per day but if they do start putting the sindler blocks police permits getting going I think the Tom will be satisfi sat satisfied and I I don't want to increase the hardship on them it seems to me they're going through a hardship to be going through this all these years they must have some kind of hardship financial hardship with all due respect R um I think you're you're you're you're saying one thing and then doing another because you just said that it doesn't matter what the fine is that they're going to have it all fixed by June so why not make the fine higher well if if if that's required the new revision I don't like to put that bigger I'm not fines either however I am a fan of but what would be satisfaction you know between 25 to 250 it's a motivator it I know it is a motivator but you know this within within 100 days will be $2,500 within a year you just said they're going to have it all done by June well well yeah well I'm I'm hoping that would be an incentive I gave him a lower fine to just go and get from the street there's nothing done from the street there's been nothing done for years bill you want to say something I just think we've we've kind of bent the compliance rules uh a little bit in case to begin with so it's it's hard for me to to to justify a high fine or or a repeat violation where we go back and give them fines from for previous work I don't think that's going to get we're we want to encourage compliance right that's our goal right and I think in this case I just don't see where a high find is going to help these people get the job done and I would like to have another 30 days and yeah if they don't come back with any kind of hard evidence that they're making progress then you know we'll we'll deal with it at that time and and I'm okay with that like if they come back and they can show us that there's evidence that there's making progress and they're they're stepping up and they're doing the things that they need to do because we've all had worked on our house we've all you know you can get your contractor to give you paperwork to show that things are being done that's something they can do I'm not saying I don't want to I don't want to back date I don't want to back date fines I'm not I'm not encouraging that like I don't think that's that's the right thing to do but I'm I'm I'm kind of $25 a day is very that's what we do for parking I'm agreeing with you in that in the sense that and the fine won't start for 30 days once we set the fine that's it corre we can't increase it at a later date so maybe we want to start with something a little more urgent uh it's up I mean I'm may I speak sure yeah um Brian I agree with you uh I think $25 is is has a little sting you know um what did you have in mind I I mean personally for me for considering that we've already given I mean they've come in front of us several times now this is and and from the street from the road you can't see the difference I would say $100 a day I'm not saying 250 I'm not saying 500 we can go to 500 this a repeat violation we can go to $500 a day I'm not saying we do that cuz I again our job is to encourage compliance our job is to help them get to that point but I want encouragement I guess just had a question for Tom just so if we go with a higher fine uh would you be open to this to the same principles that we used before where just showing signs of of construction would be quote in compliance so we wouldn't if they made some a significant amount of progress by Next by 30 days would we went would we could we you know get not not not not impose the $100 they fine if if that was the case if I if I was to see SLE blocks up maybe some trust yeah I'd be satisfied with that I think that's fair the respondent did say it'll only take a few days to put a cindle block walls up so I'm good with that so so in that I'm good with the higher fine as as long as the city as long as the city is you know remember you always have the option if they want to come in for you know because the way you've done this just like any other case they can always come so hey we've got you know made this x progress that's true yeah we don't have which I'm absolutely okay with that like I If if there is progress and there is movement happening I'm okay like I I don't want to find people just for the sake of finding people that's not what we're here to do but from the road I'm sorry from the road there's been no earlier there's also the lean reduction process if you know if they were to incur substantial fine and they they can show proof that you know was out of their carry and control that the black guy went on strike or whatever they can come back I forget what it is how many days after compliance um what's it yeah 35 35 days after compliance they can file for lean reduction so there's there's a couple of avenues to lessen the Sting If the sting is if they do incur a fine but I'm personally I'm in in in Brian's camp that we need to get some incentive here to get things moving I don't mind revising it to $100 a day so so please do it formally yes um do I have to you have to do is say I'm I'd like to revise my motion and say what you're going to say okay I would like to revise my motion to uh revise the fine uh to be $100 per day starting on starting on um June 12th 2024 do we have a revise to a motion do we who want me to re second it yeah yes I second okay any other discussion seeing none all those in favor I oppose no Nays okay so here's what happened you have been found in violation if you do not show progress on that that particular structure by June 12th a fine of $100 per day will begin to incur be incurred on the property um so it's in your best interest to um provide Tom with proof of the the trusses get the block ey out there um if you have any other questions about to getting the electric pole inspected Dallas is always available um but you got to get moving okay and um wish you luck okay thank you next case pleasee 23- 6292 City versus Chelsea Jenkins for the property located at 7510 gadston Drive the cases before the board based on alleged violation of section 88-102 13B exterior walls maintained in good condition Section 8 10213 C roof maintained in good condition and Section 8 10213 p structural supports maintained in good repair the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lorie Smith city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served thank you good evening Mr chairman board members Lori Smith C compliance this case originated proactively on December the 28th 2023 my inspection revealed front and east side wall stains bascia staining the east side soet was in disrepair and the front porch was missing a support column at that time I left a door hanger with a compliance date of the 29th of January 2024 my inspection on January the 35 31st 2024 revealed the front wall and the and the facial stains had been removed the east side wall stains were attempted by pressure washing but may require painting also there was no change to the sopit and disrepair nor the missing support column on the patio of the structure therefore a notice of violation was prepared with the compliance date of the 29th of March 2024 no one was at home so I posted the notice letter at the front door and request that copies be sent certified in first class mail to the owner of record also request that a copy be posted at City Hall for the 10day requirement at this time I would like to submit photographic evidence taken by me on January the 31st and April the 23rd 2024 showing the violations we'll accept those thank you yes sir exhibit number one shows a notice letter posted at the front door exhibit number two shows the east side wall stains and a missing support column on the patio exhibit number three shows the East Side s and disrepair exhibit number four shows the top section where the missing support column was originally on the patio exhibit number five shows the bottom section on the concrete floor where the support column was Mr chairman and board members m m Miss Jenkins did contact me on January the 31st 2024 concerning the notice of violation letter she stated she would begin pressure washing the structure to remove the staining and would be checking into solidifying a contractor to re to uh to uh get for the uh needed repair work to the east side sopit and also the missing support column on the patio she has been in contact UM with me and um as of today's date the site does remain out of compliance and I am seeking a ruling but she is here this evening and would like to address the board yes sir pleas you sit down yes sir any questions for the code officer go ahead bill so all three violations are still in place yes sir in one form or another she said she did do some pressure washing yes sir she did she did the uh the pressure washing on the front of the structure got the uh the wall stains removed on the front as well as the fascia uh we have those on the east side as well which she did attempt um and made a really good attempt in getting those off uh there's a huge oak tree that's over there on the side a lot of that stainings came from the uh the oak tree um I'm hoping that she's going to be able to I don't know what kind of chemical would use to get the the mildew off but it seems like some pesky uh type of orange yeah for whatever reason is on that east side and and Miss Jenkins was unable to get it off at that time uh but she's she's definitely uh you know been been working towards uh trying to bring the the property into compliance is there any safety concerns uh as far as the missing column is there any the like is the is the roof sag sagging or is there any change no sir it's it's not sagging um as far as any kind of uh you know uh something that Dallas is here and would be better burst as far as to say yes uh that they're there is some uh you know that column uh you know they they would need something else or do something else uh to it from what I have seen of the column sir it is not dipping um there are other ones uh in the in the neighborhood um and they do have you know all the columns but again Miss Jenkins I do not see where it's it's leaning it's dipping um it's intact uh the other uh support columns also look good um when I looked at those um so in your opinion it's not a public safety concern no sir at this point sir no sir okay any other questions thank you yes sir you want to approach he everybody before you say anything name and address please good evening um I don't dispute anything that she says she hang on hang on name and address please I can't hear name and address my address your name and address name and address oh Chelsea Jenkins uh 7510 Gaston Drive okay Temple terce floor is yours say what you want to say oh um I don't dispute what she's saying she's uh pretty accurate um when it comes to the the the exterior panel um that she's speaking of at first we thought it was something that was like structural to my roof but it it's not um I called a few different companies it's hard to describe over the phone exactly what it is cuz roofing companies don't do that it's it's a just another company I called three or four had it scheduled I have job a part-time job kids so if I have something scheduled with the company two or three days they said that they're going to come out they don't follow up I'm not calling that company back I'm going to go to another company it just so happened nobody does me and her did have a conversation and she gave me the number to I can't remember whom called to see if I needed a permit to fix it we talked about it because it's less than 100 square fet and again it's not structural to my roof I don't need apartment so now I do have a handyman that is coming to do it but I was trying to get like a contract company to do it so if there was any permits or anything to be done they would be responsible for pulling it so if possible I could just get like I don't know a week or so and then it'll be done any other questions thank you ma'am you can have a seat you can sit down okay thanks okay if there's no other questions I'll entertain a motion all right I'll take this [Music] one in case number 23- 6292 I move that the city has proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violations of the city of Temple Terrace code exists on the property located at 7510 gadon Drive violations sections 88-102 D13 DB uh 8-12 D13 C and 88-102 D13 DP uh this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer Lorie Smith and Chelsea Jenkins along with any other evidence including photos affidavits and the notice of violation all of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that said violations be corrected honor before June 12th 2024 if the respondant does not comply with this order honored before that day they are ordered to pay a fine for each and every day the violations continue past the date set for compliance upon considering the following factors the gravity of the violations any actions taken by the Violator to correct the violations and any previous violations committed by The Violator I move that the fine be $50 per day we have a motion do we have a second second motion a second any further discussion see none all those in favor I oppose no Nays motion carries okay so you've been found in violation uh you have until June 12th of this year to bring the property into compliance that includes the this the uh post and all the staining all that stuff okay if if it's not brought into compliance by June 12th a fine of $50 per day will start at midnight that night okay thank you good luck yes sir you want to tell her about if she about oh yeah if for some for some for some reason you can't get it done by June 12th you need to come back to us let us know the reasons why and you're welcome to ask for an extension there is never a guarantee you will get an extension but you can ask okay oh it's going be done okay I hope so good luck she wi it two weeks you got money yeah good luck but that's but that option does is available to you if something does come up okay thank you all right now we're back to our regular scheduled program case number 24- 0991 okay case case number 24- 0991 City versus Randa Mustafa for the property located at 8713 Beverly Drive the case is before the board based on alleged violation of section 88-102 13c roof maintained in good condition case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lorie Smith city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served good evening again Mr chairman board members Lori Smith Code Compliance this case originated proactively on March the 5th 2024 my inspection revealed Bogen bill of vegetation on the south side of the roof at that time I left a door hanger with the reinspection datee of the 19th of March 2024 my inspection on March the 22nd 2024 revealed no change therefore notice of violation was prepared with the compliance date of the 10th of April 2024 no one was at home so I posted the notice letter at the front door and requested copies be sent certified in first class mail to the owner of record I also request that a copy be posted at City Hall for the 10-day requirement at this time I would like to submit photographic evidence of the violations taken by me on March the 26 2024 showing the violation exhibit number one shows the notice letter post at the front door exhibit number two shows the Bogan Villa on the roof south side of the structure as of today's date Mr chairman board members of site is now in compliance I'd like to submit an Affidavit of compliance and I'm just looking for a finding we will accept that thank you yes sir any questions for the code officer seeing none I'll entertain a motion I can do this one thank you in case number 24- 0991 I move the city is proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violations of the City Temple te code did exist on the property located 8713 Beverly Drive applicable codes 88-102 subsection 13 subsection see this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from Code Enforcement Officers along with other evidence including photos affidavits and the notice of violation all of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that there be no fine imposed because the violations were brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing we have a motion do we have a second second motion and a second any further discussion yeah I just want to make a personal comment that uh somebody deserves an award for removing that yeah that that's a hugee Bogan viia and I've I've had to deal with those things the Thor the thorns on those things are nasty I mean you can fighting a snake it's it's and you'll end up and you'll yeah you will get bit you'll have plenty plenty of scars to show for it so postcard time [Laughter] Tom all right wow if there's no other comments um all those in favor opposed no nay motion carries next case please case 24-10 21 City versus alazami M alazami for the property located at 235 willowwick Avenue the case is before the board based an alleged violation of section 8-28 A1 permit application required the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Doug Allen city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served good evening Mr chairman and board members Doug Allen code compliance officer this case was was initiated from Community Development on March 6 2024 as they had placed a red tag for AC work being done without a permit I prepared a notice of violation on March 28th 2024 with a reinspection date of April 3rd 2024 I posted a copy of the notice of violation at the front door and a copy was posted at City Hall for the 10-day requirement and copies were mailed both certified and regular mail to the address of the owner of record my communication with commun Community Development showed no permit had been acquired so a notice of hearing was prepared on April 19th 2024 and the case was scheduled for the May Municipal Code board meeting I have been in contact with the resident he will be out of town for this hearing but he stated he has been in contact excuse me with Community Development and plans on having some old permits closed out and will have the current AC issue resolved within 30 days this time I would like to submit photographic evidence taken by myself on March 28th 202 4 and a screenshot of the stop work order we accept that thank [Music] you uh exhibit number one shows the notice of violation exhibit number two shows a screenshot of the stop work order uh Mr fos just informed me that apparently the the permit has been applied for just has to be paid for okay and the site is not in compliance and I'm seeking a ruling we good thank you and any questions for the Cod officer uh yes um what what's replacing the whole entire AC or just the I have no idea how how did you catch the violation it's it's whatever the violation is he needs a permit and he hasn't got the permit so that's the violation how do we know that he was working on the AC Community Development put a red tag on the site and informed us that they'd put a red tag on the site for work without a permit it was it was a neighbor complaint to Community Development oh okay any other questions see none I'll entertain a motion you want to do it it's totally up to you all right so um in case number 24- 1021 I move that the city is proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violation of the city of Temple terrce City code exists on the property located at 235 willowwick Avenue and the code violation is section 8-28 A-1 this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from code enforcement officer Doug Allen along with any other evidence including photos affidavits and the notice of violation all of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that said violations be corrected on honor before June 12th 2024 if the respondent does not comply with this order honor before that day they are ordered to pay a fine for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance upon considering the following factors the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the Violator to correct the violation and any previous violations committed by The Violator I move that the fine be $25 per day we have a motion do we have a second second motion is second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I oppos no Nays motion carries next case please case 24274 City versus zulia m tahada d pagero and Alfredo M pagero Rivera for the property located at 5215 Holland Avenue the cas is before the board based on alleged violation of section 10-3 B sanitation grass weeds the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Allan the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing are properly sered good evening Mr chairman and board members Doug Allen code compliance officer this case was originated By Me on March 25th 2024 for overgrown conditions I left a door hanger with a reinspection datee of March 26 2024 my reinspection I'm sorry on April 8th 2024 my reinspection on April 9th showed no change I prepared a notice of violation on that date with a reinspection date of April 16th I posted the notice at the front door and a copy was posted at City hall for the 10-day requirement and copies were mailed both certified and regular mail to the owner of record my reinspection on April 19th showed no change so I prepare to notice a hearing on that date and the case was scheduled for the May Municipal Code board meeting this time I'd like to submit photographic evidence taken by myself on April 9th and April 19th and also I'd like to submit an affidavit to compliance because the site is in compliance and I'm seeking and finding very good thank you we'll accept that zipment number one shows the notice of violation posting and Exhibits number two and three show the overgrown conditions good any questions for the code officer see none I entertain a motion I okay in case number 24-10 21 I move that the city has proven by greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Temple terce City code did exist on the property located at uh 235 will will lock Avenue with applicable case oh I'm sorry oh 74 sorry sorry wrong case in case number 24-1 1274 I move that city has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the City Temple Terrace city code exist on the property located at uh 5215 Holland Avenue with the applicable code violation section 10-3 subsection B this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer Doug Allen uh along with any other Witnesses uh along with any other evidence including photos Abid David and the notice of violation of which received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that the fine there the be no fine imposed because the violation were brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing okay we have a motion do we have a second second motion the second and further discussion seeing none all those in favor I oppos no Nays motion C next and last case a case 241385 City versus white glove Holdings to LLC for the property located at 1401 North River Hills Drive the case is before the board based on alleged violation of section 8- 10222 maintenance of structures the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Doug Allen the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served thank you good evening once again Mr chairman and board members Doug Allen code compliance officer this case was originated by a citizen complaint on April 1st 20124 for a shed roof and disrepair I left a door hanger with a reinspection datee of April 3rd 2024 my reinspection on April 10th showed no change so a notice of violation was generated on that date with a reinspection datee of April 24th I posted a notice at the site a notice was also posted at City Hall for the 10-day requirement and copies were mailed both certified and regular mailed to the address of the owner of record on April 25th 2024 my reinspection showed no change so I prepared a notice of hearing on that date and the case was scheduled for the May Municipal Code board meeting this time I'd like to submit photographic evidence of the site taken by myself on April 10th and April 25th 2024 we'll accept those thank you thank uh exhibit number one shows the posting of the notice of violation and exhibit number two shows the shed roof and disrepair the site is not in compliance and I'm seeking a ruling very good any questions for the code officer so this is a a building kind of behind the house or it's a shed yeah it's just a utility shed adjacent to the house or the property or I I guess the house yeah had any contact with the homeowner yeah no the house sold roughly a year ago perhaps a little bit more than that and been vacant ever since whoever somebody pays somebody to mow the grass cuz it's always I mean you never you would never know that the house was vacant other than you never see a car there I've never heard from anybody so can you tell if the power still on um it have to be I would think to be think doesn't have to be but it makes sense it would be doesn't have to be it's pretty big house I don't know River yeah it's right on the river it's on the river side no no never seen like I said never seen a vehicle never seen anybody actually there was a notice I'd put on the door in 2023 and it was still on the door from 2023 so okay wellow okay that kind of makes me assume that nobody's coming on Wow was this shed permitted oh God I have no idea I mean we can't we cannot no well it's it's not that it's I know a shed has you need a permit for a shed right it depends depends on the size depends on the size and loc right and this one's I mean for the roof to have gotten in that bad of shape I'm assuming this shed's or 20 years old I mean it was a pre-engineered design shed so you can do that okay there's no other questions I'll entertain a motion I'll do the last one okay all right in case number this time I get this this correctly that'd be nice I  case number 24 13 85 I move that the city has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Temple ter city code exist on the property located at 1401 North River Hills Drive with applicable code violation section 8-12 subsection 22 this motion is based on the swor testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer de Island along with any other evidence including photos avid and the notice of violation of which received and uh not all which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that the said violation be corrected on order before June 12th 2024 if the respondent does not comply with this order on or before the day they are ordered to pay a fine for each and every day the violation continue pass the date set for compliance upon considering the following factors the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the Violator to correct the violation any previous violations committed by The Violator I move the fine be $25 per day we have a motion do we have a second second motion a second any further discussion none all those in favor I oppos no n motion carries okay on to unfinished business okay unfinished business case number 23- 3239 City vers Halu bua for the property located at 12917 ter Springs Drive the deadline for compliance was April 10th 2024 an affid of compliance was submitted by Officer Lorie Smith for Section 8- 10213 C dated April 10th 2024 case number 23-5 221 City vers Matthew raran for the property located at 409 Bullard Parkway the deadline for compliance is tonight at midnight an Affidavit of compliance was submitted by director Bron for sections 88-102 130 and 81023 P dated May 8th 2024 yeah case number 24- 0154 City versus M3 assets LLC for the property located at 8602 Shirley Drive the deadline for compliance was April 10th 2024 an after of non-compliance was subm was issued by Officer Lorie Smith was submitted by Officer Lorie Smith for Section 8-28 A1 dated April 11th 24 case number 24- 0188 City versus zadel and Marin for the property located at 202 Mission Hills Avenue the deadline for compliance is tonight at midnight an after of compliance was submitted by Officer Allen for sections 10-34 and 103b on April 30th 2024 case number 24- 0466 City vers John P Ziggler for the property located at 306 South Berling game Avenue the deadline for compliance was April 10th 2024 and Affidavit of non-compliance was submitted by Officer Smith for Section 12- 8592 dated April 11th 2024 case number 24532 City vers Barrow Properties LLC for the properly located 8727 Beverly Drive the deadline for compliance was April 10th 2024 and Affidavit of compliance was submitted by Officer Lorie Smith for Section 8-28 A1 dated April 10th 2024 case number 24-16 City verse Gonzalo Fernandez Lopez and Sophia PES PES for the property located at 302 Shadow Lane the property for compliance is tonight at midnight and affid of compliance was submitted by Officer Smith for Section 8-28 A1 dated May 3rd 2024 I also have one that is not on the agenda okay so it's going to be case numbers 23-1 1696 and 23 2894 City vers Mission Street homes LLC for the property located at 7815 blar Drive payment of $4,250 was made on April 19th 20124 in this case is no longer on the lean's list great that's it nice very good thank you is there any other board action leans report you guys should have been uh got an updated leans report in your package along with a spreadsheet showing the case number and name and the leans amounts that have been paid pa um totaling $2,838 and I would at this point like to ask the deputy clerk to please place a copy of the L's list into the record thank you cor any new business okay I don't have any new business just a reminder um that when you get the email about whether or not you're going to be able to make it tonight please try to respond promptly um any other new business I guess the only I had make sure everyone got the the email not ification or maybe I'm the only one that got one about having to register with the state you're the only one that got one the financial disclosure I got one too oh I got that you did one too yeah I wasn't sure if it was real It is Well I contacted J well it is and you have to and and you're filling it out online now you're not you're not getting in the mail so it is real now Jen that's a good point I didn't get one I don't trust the internet so I I don't know if it's um if it's related to when we started I recently filled that one David well that's why you didn't get one I get some um I will you do it every year yeah you do it every year yeah but I usually get them in the mail and this and this year they changed it online only this year yeah I just did mine this week I did I just did mine this week as well I don't trust that it's pretty much I will I will look into it okay my that yeah and you he has to get another one cuz he deleted he thought it was crap so no no I I didn't I they'll send you more I just didn't open it yet well what I don't want to happen is everybody to get and say hey you're late I have one question for Tom they'll send you one each week oh really yes because I've got three of them now oh you do oh oh really okay I haven't got any well Bill get on yeah I know well I just was I was like you I was a little suspicious again I don't know if it's based on when you became a member or what but I don't think it is I think it's my first time dealing with it so I'll figure it out okay appreciate it now I it's real I'll I'll actually like put my info in but it's essentially the same as uh as what we fill out on paper right it's just an electronic yes yeah and it's not the same one that that James has to but I wasn't about to put all my info in it could be just the link and if it's that if it's just the link and it's not tied to your names um I I just filled mine out for the first time but if it's not tied to your names I can forward you guys the link that I received that'd be great yeah yeah try that first and that way I can try that first and get it to you guys get your identity swollen and then question why not I don't have anything take your debt where is that coming from what an email address oh fdls Department ofs yeah Department Florida Commission of Ethics hold on um pull I will forward it to you and then you'll be able to see from mine it is legitimate yeah it is your financial disclosure form it's just the form one so um they're not asking for as much information as they would on the form six which is for elected officials only so to yeah and it's for those of you who filled them out the past it's the same form you've been filling out on paper just now this year it's electronic yeah it makes it easier actually because you can in I I always made a copy of mine just in case they decided I didn't do it but I really did so so now I can just have to print it I guess there's a hopefully there's an option to print it when you're done email too yes yeah there you go anything else go ahead question for go ahead uh I only see two Accord Enforcement Officers I I thought we hired a new guy yeah he didn't make he didn't make it this week he resigned wasn't looking good you know se's working out very well he just had no cases tonight to present no cases he chose us go home that's good okay he's fine that's so nice thank you for asking I'm I'm just asking you know because no he quit he hated it well the real problem was this guy Rod's house he found out he can't touch it or something and there so so many violations working in the neighborhood of our chairman so you know it's it's really scary he's still he's still in there filling out all the violation forms fny okay if there's nothing else I entertain a motion to adjourn motion to adjourn motion we have a second all those in favor we are adjourned thank you it felt like I was not sure [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music]