The board members engaged in a debate over the necessity of conducting a new traffic study related to the Union Hotel project, with concerns raised about the impact of road closures on data accuracy and the responsibility of funding the study. The board questioned the need for the study given previous reports and the project’s proximity to existing infrastructure. Despite differing opinions, the board moved forward with the appointment of Mr. Trapman as the traffic engineer for the study, seeking clarification on its scope and additional funding requirements.

The reduction of parking spots due to the proposed developments, including the Chick-fil-A site’s addition of a second drive-thru lane, prompted discussions on the potential overflow into nearby streets and the implications for parking permits. The board voiced concerns over the impact on parking and the necessity to adjust signage notation to accommodate the changes. The board’s engineer, Michael Campion, underscored the importance of compliance with updated storm water regulations, particularly in light of the proposed site modifications exceeding the lease area. Campion emphasized the need for a detailed storm water management plan to address increased impervious coverage and ensure adherence to new standards, including the provision of electric vehicle spaces.

The applicant’s representative for Chick-fil-A acknowledged the deficiencies in the submitted plans and committed to revising the proposal to address the board’s concerns, particularly related to storm water management and landscaping. Technical difficulties during the site plan approval hearing led to the decision to adjourn the discussion to a later date, with the board insisting on a more comprehensive plan before proceeding.

In addition to the development proposals, the board wrestled with the application of EV regulations, expressing frustration over the ambiguity in the model ordinance from the Department of Community Affairs. There was uncertainty about whether the regulations applied to new or existing parking spaces. The board decided to carry the application to the March 26 hearing date to gain further clarity on these regulations.

The meeting also focused on the progress of the historic district map, with the board voting to move forward with the discussion and preparing a report for the change in the historic district. The possibility of a joint hearing for the historic district report and the master plan amendment was explored to streamline the process and minimize the need for multiple meetings. The Historic Preservation Commission mentioned the upcoming historic house tour and sought volunteers, reflecting ongoing efforts to promote and preserve the town’s heritage.

Administrative matters included the upcoming completeness review of an application for an accessory structure on Main Street and an appeal. The board emphasized the importance of thorough checklists to ensure that all required information is provided for analysis. Training for new members was addressed, with plans for providing access to certification classes and scheduling training sessions.