The highest number of investigations occurred among preK through grade 5 students, with the next highest in grades 9 through 12. The board attributed the decrease in total incidents to the preliminary determination policy, which allows for a more comprehensive approach rather than a hypersensitive reaction to bullying allegations. This policy facilitates early and meaningful conversations, particularly with younger students, about the law and its implications.

The revised policy 5512, which includes the preliminary determination by the principal or designee in consultation with the anti-bullying specialist, has shifted the focus from punitive measures to educational conversations. This shift is considered a positive change by the board, as it allows for more nuanced handling of incidents and emphasizes the importance of preventive measures and education.

The presentation underscored that incidents of bullying were most prevalent during unstructured times, but there was also a noticeable uptick in classroom incidents. This increase was attributed to teachers becoming more vigilant and proactive in recognizing and reporting potential bullying. The characteristics most commonly associated with bullying were race, ethnicity, and appearance, with appearance-related incidents, such as fat shaming and name-calling, being the most frequent.

The district’s efforts to address and prevent bullying extend beyond the preliminary determination policy. The board highlighted the role of school culture and climate teams, which involve multidisciplinary groups, student surveys, and staff professional development. These teams are crucial in building proactive programming and ensuring consistency in anti-bullying practices across the district.

Mental health resources for students, including school counselors and student assistance counselors, were emphasized as key components in supporting students and encouraging them to report incidents. The board also discussed the challenges of interpreting and applying the 2022 amendments to the anti-bullying law, especially regarding the visibility of founded incidents in a student’s record and the impact on postsecondary opportunities.

Peer mediation was another topic of discussion, described as a voluntary process that depends on the discretion of the anti-bullying specialist and school administration.

Superintendent Dr. David Aderhold emphasized the importance of reporting incidents and the availability of a reporting form on the district’s website. He encouraged parents to communicate with school staff to address bullying concerns proactively. Despite the opportunity for public comment on the bullying report, there were no participants.

In other areas of the meeting, the administration and facilities committee report, presented by Dr. Lee McDonald, Deputy Superintendent of Schools, covered a range of topics from school safety and security to renovations and construction projects. The curriculum committee report included a review of proposed summer courses and professional development for staff. The finance committee discussed financial reports, grant applications, and cafeteria operations.

During the voting segment, the board approved various administration, curriculum, and finance items, and recognized several district retirees for their dedication and service. Dana Krug provided information on the upcoming Mercer County School Board Association meeting, with a focus on school finance.