Residents and commissioners discussed the potential reallocation of funds initially designated for the recreation center towards traffic mitigation strategies, including the implementation of signage and flashing lights to address speeding and other traffic-related issues. The commission proposed allocating $100,000 to the traffic mitigation strategies line item. The discussion on potential areas for fund reallocation also included reducing the scope of the dog park or seeking private funding for it, as well as exploring private fundraising for water stations.

The “do not even speed” campaign was a focal point, with the commission considering the number and placement of signs necessary to deter speeding effectively. The police department was expected to advise on the strategic placement of the signs and provide cost estimates for their implementation. This topic underscored the urgency of addressing speeding concerns in the village, aligning with the broader objective of enhancing traffic safety.

Further discussions included the efficiency and effectiveness of the local police force in relation to traffic enforcement. A historical recount of an increase in traffic ticket issuance by the existing police force without additional staff suggested that a reallocation of current resources could achieve better enforcement. The commission emphasized the importance of outcomes such as reduced speeding over the number of tickets written to gauge the success of traffic enforcement strategies.

The commission also addressed the need for electronic access control systems at the police department to mitigate potential risks and facilitate the accreditation process. The project, which was considered urgent, saw the commission working to expedite the proposal, with two quotes already received and a third pending.

Community-generated proposals for amenities and projects were reviewed with the aim of organizing the list to prioritize funded items. The commission agreed to restructure the list to make it more manageable, without discarding any suggestions.

Among other items discussed were the financial planning for various community projects, including the feasibility of designating the Log Cabin as a historical site, installing solar panels on public buildings, and the potential liability associated with the village’s streets and walkways. A consensus was reached on the importance of having funds available for short-term traffic mitigation solutions while awaiting the completion of a comprehensive traffic study.

The debate over the allocation of funds and the prioritization of projects, such as the dog park, pickleball courts, and traffic mitigation, was indicative of the commission’s intent to address both immediate community needs and longer-term projects.