The meeting, which included an emotionally charged atmosphere, was dominated by the debate surrounding the city manager’s potential removal. A resolution to remove Hernandez was presented, citing alleged failures to work equally with all council members and lacking the courtesy, integrity, cooperation skills, and judgment necessary for the position. Hernandez responded to the allegations, denying them and emphasizing her dedication to the community and the city’s accomplishments under her leadership. The public comments section saw an overwhelming show of support for Hernandez, with residents expressing their admiration for her work, especially her 20-year service and her positive impact on the community.

Margarita Galves, a long-time resident, defended Hernandez against what she considered unfair attacks and urged cooperation to improve the city. Velda Lopez, from the Special Olympics community, appreciated Hernandez’s efforts with children with special needs. Juan Colonades praised the progress in security and structural improvements during Hernandez’s administration. Ricky Fernandez, a resident and pastor, called for better administration and unity, while Bradley Caban criticized the potential removal of Hernandez’s job. Rabbi Rashit expressed dismay over the situation, labeling it a “tragedy” and a “travesty.”

In the same vein, other residents spoke highly of Hernandez’s commitment and integrity, with one emphasizing her role in the city’s growth and stability and another praising her positive reputation.

Furthermore, there were concerns raised about the impact of Hernandez’s removal on the city’s governance. Multiple speakers, including a CPA and the president of the Chamber of Commerce, expressed disbelief at the allegations against Hernandez and showed solidarity with her continued leadership. An organization against bullying acknowledged the support received from the city, stressing the benefits of maintaining the current administration.

There was a discussion on the legal and ethical implications of the city manager’s position and the potential conflicts of interest that could arise. The council members, whose names are not disclosed due to the uncertainty of their presence, also addressed the public perception of division within the council and the importance of unity for the city’s well-being.

The mayor, whose involvement in the meeting is confirmed, highlighted the necessity of basing governance on facts and information rather than perception. The mayor also argued for allowing Hernandez the option to resign with dignity and severance, an aspect that was later clarified by the city attorney regarding the conditions under which Hernandez would be entitled to severance pay.

Ultimately, the motion to terminate Hernandez’s employment without cause was passed, followed by a decision to appoint an interim city manager. A nomination for the interim position was debated, as was the effective date of the appointment and the length of the interim period. The council agreed to have an independent attorney review the relevant charter sections and requested safeguards for the interim city manager during their tenure.