The board granted relief for several deviations, including front yard setback, setback from the property line, and parking setback from M Brook Road.

Another point of discussion was the affordable housing allocation for three sites, where the applicant’s council addressed issues such as drainage and the need for access to the west or out to Grove Street. The feasibility of the projects and the potential for engineering optimizations were debated, with an emphasis on the importance of conditions and the need for review and approval. The board verified its ability to effectively hear and decide cases, and reviewed updates to the plans, including a trail easement, building relocation, amended floor plans, and feedback from the fire department.

The meeting also focused on the economic impact of the proposed plans and the potential benefits to both the applicant and the borough. The board expressed concerns about the agreements in place and the potential cost implications of alternative plans. The livability of the affordable housing was emphasized, with board members suggesting that the impact of any changes should be considered for the residents’ well-being.

Additionally, the Planning Board entertained a proposal for an amended preliminary and final major affordable multifamily site on Mount Ary Road. The applicant presented changes to the building and drive aisle locations, and the elimination of windows facing a neighboring property owner. The application was deemed complete, with the understanding that certain conditions would be addressed as part of the approval process.

There was also a discussion regarding a preliminary concept for a property development project, including the placement of the drive and parking spaces. The board examined the parking ratio for the 12 units, debating the need for variance relief, considering the proximity to downtown and transit-oriented development.

Furthermore, the meeting covered a variety of other development-related topics. The board discussed the potential for widening access to a site’s northeast corner, building layout and access, and the removal of fallen trees from a wooded area. Public concerns were raised about the type of trees in a landscaping plan and the need for additional screening to mitigate the visual impact of the buildings.

The board’s discussion on the proposed easement along property frontage, the monument sign at the front of the property, and the inclusion of a water room within the building to avoid the need for a hot box outside were also noteworthy. There was debate about the impact of these on the surrounding area and whether they complied with setback requirements.

The meeting concluded with the acknowledgment that the applications had undergone changes and improvements, and the board expressed appreciation for the progress made.