A crucial point of the meeting was the council’s decision to approve a request from the Bergen County United Way to demolish existing buildings on Serpentine Avenue, paving the way for the development of affordable housing units. This decision came despite concerns voiced by some neighbors about the potential impact of the demolition on the local area.

In tandem with the affordable housing resolution, the council also approved the introduction of a new ordinance into the borough’s code book which mandates lead inspections. This ordinance is a proactive measure to ensure the health and safety of residents by preventing lead contamination.

Another topic that garnered attention was the proposal to install lights on a police department building. There was a debate among the council over the merits of this proposal, particularly concerning its potential impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Seeking to address these concerns while still moving forward, the council agreed to proceed with the proposal to gather more information for future deliberation.

The Senior Services Committee’s request for benches at specific locations was discussed.

In addition to infrastructure and service improvements, the council also showed support for local activities by considering the approval of the Spring Fling Banner, an event organized by the Downtown Committee and the Chamber of Commerce. The mayor received gratitude for his role in promoting the event, which is part of a broader effort to stimulate community engagement and local commerce.

The subject of the Roosevelt Common Tennis Court resurfacing was brought up during the meeting, with the suggestion to involve the Department of Public Works in assessing both the funding required and the location for the project. This item was indicative of the council’s ongoing efforts to maintain and improve recreational facilities for residents.

There was also a report on the Palisades Multi-Use Path study by the New York State, which is an ongoing project that involves input from stakeholders. This project is part of a larger initiative to promote alternative transportation and recreational options in the region.

A correspondence from the Song and Park family was addressed during the meeting, appealing a decision by the building department regarding light pears. The council suggested involving the police department in the review process.

The meeting also included a public comment session where individuals, including Andrew M and Dr. Coleman, provided insights about the Greenway project. They encouraged council members to participate in upcoming sessions.

In closing the session, the council addressed administrative matters by approving a resolution to go into a closed session to discuss contract negotiations, potential litigation, and real property acquisition. Upon returning to open session, the council approved a resolution related to the closed session discussions and voted to conclude the public meeting.