Residents expressed concerns about the expansion of the EP Polymers facility on River Road, particularly focusing on the potential for increased traffic and disruption in their community. The applicant’s representatives clarified that the expansion would be used for indoor storage, and any outdoor storage would be removed as part of the application. Residents were also concerned about the nature of the chemicals being stored, with the applicant confirming that one of the tenants produced food additives and flavors.

A traffic expert, Mr. Troutman, provided testimony indicating a minimal increase in traffic due to the proposed warehouse, estimating only three car trips and eight truck trips on a typical weekday. However, there were unresolved questions regarding the truck turning path near the facility and potential encroachment and safety issues. Despite the concerns, the board emphasized their limited authority, stating that traffic issues are within the jurisdiction of the township governing body and not the planning board.

Another issue debated was the application by F.F. Greek Development for the construction of a new 53,130 square foot building in the I2 industrial district, intended for manufacturing with associated office and employee parking. The applicant sought various variances and waivers for setbacks, surface coverage, and parking. The proposal included testimony from multiple witnesses, including the property owner and experts in civil engineering, architecture, and traffic engineering.

During discussions about a new property for Blue Sky, the company’s intent to use a rail siding for operations was revealed, with operations involving the blending of diesel fuel to produce diesel exhaust fluid. The company’s operations were detailed, including the expected minimal waste generation and the types of trucks that would be on-site. The board also addressed the storage of materials and the change in office square footage, emphasizing compliance with fire safety regulations.

A resident from the 55-plus community at Hand Creek Side voiced frustrations over the perceived negative impact of warehouse construction on their property values and quality of life. The planning board reiterated its limited role in the decision-making process and directed residents to contact the township committee for zoning-related concerns.

Another resident criticized the disruption caused by the construction of a new warehouse, mentioning issues such as cement dust and safety hazards. The response from local authorities was perceived as inadequate, and the resident was advised to reach out to the mayor’s office for further action.

The meeting also covered technical details of the proposed developments, including a discussion about the relocation of a driveway and the construction of a new warehouse with one loading dock. The potential increase in truck traffic and the impact on traffic flow on River Road were scrutinized. The applicant cited a report from the township traffic expert that found no additional truck traffic during rush hours due to the small warehouse space being proposed. The board also inquired about the landscaping plan, which aimed to provide screening for the new warehouse and loading docks.