A major focus of the meeting was the potential sale of the borough’s sewer system, a move that could have long-lasting implications for the community. The council discussed various options for managing the wastewater system, including public-private contracting, long-term lease, or outright sale. The financial benefits of not having to fund infrastructure upgrades were weighed against concerns about losing control over the system’s rates. It was mentioned that any decision to sell the system would necessitate a public referendum.

He elaborated on the four general options, notably public-private contracting and long-term lease or sale, explaining the potential processes and considerations for each. The council invited questions and comments from attendees.

Financial oversight was another issue that emerged during the meeting. Residents and council members raised questions about specific expenses in the borough’s bills list, which included payments to the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development and a licensing fee for music events. Concerns were heightened by the lack of satisfactory answers from council members, leading to tension and a pressing need for greater clarity and better communication regarding borough expenditures.

The council discussed payments to a consultant for employment council services, fair housing issues, and mold remediation. Doubts were cast on the ongoing payments to a consultant who reportedly has not been successful in court cases. The cost of repairs for beach facilities and the accountability of payments made were also scrutinized. This financial discussion extended to the handling of the Lorraine property and the decision to include an affordable housing plot on the site, which some community members opposed.

One resident’s remarks underscored the need for accountability, “we need Federal investigations in here now,” highlighting the gravity of the concerns. Furthermore, the handling of the town’s financial practices was called into question, with one resident stating, “I don’t understand how we approve the bill list without someone here to answer questions,” which underscored the demand for greater oversight.

The debate over financial management continued with discussions on the 2022 audit report. A council member voiced concerns about the borough’s financial management and the discrepancies found in the audit findings. Despite these concerns, the council voted to approve the audit report. The merit pay increases for lawyers and the council’s desire for involvement in executive sessions with the labor attorney also came under scrutiny.

Frustration was expressed over the delay in receiving the preliminary budget and the perceived lack of clarity in financial reporting. The council discussed various committee reports and community events, with some members advocating for public participation in upcoming tree planting events and updates on police department needs.

Matters of property development and public space usage were also addressed, including the debate over a property at 184 and the lack of affordable housing requirements for certain developments. Residents requested more structured processes for public input on the future of community buildings and events.

The placement of electric charging stations and a contentious $2,500 non-refundable deposit for events were also on the agenda. A council member suggested amending the ordinance concerning the deposit, and there was a discussion on possibly overpaying for the borough’s website maintenance service.