Jeff Bull, the landing commissioner, presented an overview of the renovation project for Hicks Bridge Landing, focusing on the upgrade of the boat ramp and the implementation of measures to pre-treat stormwater runoff. The initiative also seeks to bolster sea level resistance and improve climate resilience. In addition to the ecological benefits, the planned improvements promise enhanced parking, safety, and possibly handicap access.

Addressing concerns from a nearby resident regarding fire safety and parking area expansion, Bull clarified that the project does not include provisions for picnic tables, campfires, or enlarging the parking area. Wendy Henderson, another commissioner, shared her insights based on her frequent use of the landing, pointing out the challenges posed by the condition of the concrete ramp and the potential advantages of adding floats on both sides.

Ryan Deont from GZA Construct Engineering brought attention to the feedback on organizing the site’s parking and presented a conceptual parking striping plan. Further discussions delved into ecological enhancements and their impact on the local habitat.

The commission also grappled with parking improvements, specifically the paving of parking areas and the incorporation of stormwater treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs). Debates emerged around whether to regulate parking for cars and trailers, especially during peak usage periods. The condition of the ramp itself was another focal point, with a commercial fisherman voicing concerns about safety hazards due to the ramp’s slab sliding into deeper water. The commission reaffirmed that parking at Hicks Bridge would remain sticker-access for residents only.

The duration of construction and its potential disruption to fishing operations was a point of contention, with the commission discussing the paving of the exit and ongoing negotiations for an easement. Environmental impacts of paving and grading changes to facilitate water flow into retention systems were also considered. Additionally, a resident’s reservations about the renovation plan were noted.

Ownership and administration of the property became a topic of interest, along with access issues, parking fees, and the prospect of installing lighting. Signage to control access and the anticipated increase in traffic and boat size led to a debate about the river’s fragile ecosystem and public river access rights. The Shellfish Advisory Committee expressed a preference for the north ramp, citing ease of use and favorable wind patterns, while comments about sea level rise emphasized the importance of environmental considerations in response to increased boat traffic.

The potential construction of an abbreviated gangway or dock on the north side of the ramp was a key discussion point, focusing on accessibility and usage. The commission pondered the removal of floats during winter and the repercussions for fishermen who rely on the facilities throughout the year. The Science Director of the Westport River Watershed Alliance stressed the need for salt marsh restoration and the allowance for marsh migration, alongside concerns about water quality affected by stormwater infrastructure.

The president of a local association raised liability concerns and the ramp’s condition, while a member of the rowing community questioned the parking plan’s adequacy for non-trailer users.

Finally, the design and logistics for the new boat ramp were thoroughly examined, with a focus on accommodating different trailer types and preventing congestion. The community was encouraged to contribute input, particularly the fishing community, on trailer area designations. Safety issues such as the ramp’s distance from the navigational channel, children jumping off the bridge, and the safety of the road exit were also brought to light. The commission discussed the necessity of dredging, regulatory compliance for float height, and handicap access, concluding with an affirmation of the value of public feedback and the intent to incorporate it into the project’s finalization.