The discussion was multifaceted, focusing primarily on the evaluation of three potential sites for the new community center, each presenting unique challenges and advantages. The Pleasant Street site was noted for its compact nature and existing utilities, yet concerns were raised about stormwater management due to limited land for absorption and zoning non-conformances. Oakland Road was favored for traffic flow but posed potential complications from bedrock and the impact on nearby properties. Simon’s Way offered ample parking and level terrain but had issues with street frontage and proximity to wetlands.

The committee examined the feasibility study presented by Joel Bargman, which detailed the constraints and possibilities of each site. Bargman’s report included considerations for parking, setbacks, and gym accommodation within the site’s size limitations. The study also addressed environmental factors such as the absence of flood plains and wetlands at the Pleasant Street location, while highlighting the need for further testing of groundwater and the potential presence of lead from a previous shooting range.

The potential impact of the center’s location on emergency access was a point of discussion, particularly the distance from the fire station and the relationship with adjacent residential properties and the ice arena. The committee scrutinized floor plans for the proposed community center, debating the arrangement of program rooms, a senior lounge, and a multi-purpose room to ensure a functional and flexible space that meets the community’s needs.

In terms of facilities, the committee grappled with cost estimates for the inclusion of a gym, track, and pickleball courts, weighing these amenities against their financial implications. The presentation of a comparative analytics chart sparked debate over the objectivity of site evaluations and the necessity of a 20% contingency in the budget for unforeseen costs. Furthermore, the discussion extended to non-construction expenses, such as hiring a project manager, architect, engineers, and legal counsel.

Beyond the primary considerations for the new center, the committee explored the possibility of extending the current Pleasantry Street Center, using solar panels, and transforming the building into a cultural hub. The introduction of pickleball courts raised concerns about potential noise and light disturbances to the neighboring community, and the choice of flooring for the gym was deliberated to accommodate various exercise activities.

The meeting concluded with the resolution to conduct further studies on the proposed sites and a commitment to a comprehensive evaluation process to ensure the new community center serves the best interests of Reading’s residents. The next steps include scheduling future meetings to continue the discussion and refining the project timeline.