The Commission examined a proposal for a commercial structure intended to facilitate a shed manufacturing business. The petitioner detailed the operational plan, which includes constructing the walls and roof of the sheds within the building, followed by delivery and installation at the customer’s location. Commission members raised questions about the possibility of outdoor displays, the types of materials to be used, the frequency of product deliveries, and concerns regarding noise and other nuisances. The petitioner reassured the Commission that manufacturing activities would predominantly occur indoors, and any noise generated would be minimal. After thorough deliberation, the Commission voted in favor of the petition.

In addition to the shed manufacturing business, the Commission discussed a request for a variance and special permit for the creation of an in-law apartment on Marger Drive. The discussion concentrated on the adherence to setback requirements and the potential impact of the new structure on the existing property. The members debated the specifics of the request, which ultimately led to a vote accepting the petition as presented.

Further development plans discussed included an extension form for a different property, the introduction of a Starbucks, and the sale of land for the development of an auto store. These developments prompted a debate amongst the Commission members regarding the potential impact on local traffic patterns and the infrastructure’s ability to handle the anticipated increase in vehicle flow. Concerns were expressed about the cumulative effect of new businesses contributing to traffic congestion within the community.

The Commission’s agenda also covered the routine approval of meeting minutes from February 12th and March 11th.