The NJ DOT officials outlined the project’s preliminary preferred alternative, which includes a 10-foot wide path along the northbound side of Route 130, optimized traffic signal timings, and geometric improvements at Creek Road to eliminate weaving lanes. This detailed presentation sparked a conversation about the intricacies of the land acquisition process for the necessary right-of-way, with council members inquiring about the potential for negotiations and the role of eminent domain if required. Concerns were expressed about the effect of the project on parking spots, which could conflict with prior township approvals for various boards. The township’s involvement in the negotiation process and the evaluation of impacts on these previous approvals were highlighted as areas needing careful consideration.

The Right of Way (ROW) process was delineated, with explanations on the stages and the Right of Way unit’s involvement. A notable point of discussion was the delay between final design and construction. The potential funding source for the project was identified as federal Highway Safety Improvement funds. Additional concerns addressed included the intersections at Hanes Mill Road and Chester Avenue, where separate projects were already in progress. Council members also questioned the feasibility of extending sidewalks and the impact of the project on bus stop accessibility.

The meeting also covered the changes to the MS4 storm drainage program, with a focus on new training requirements for elected officials and municipal employees. A 45-minute interactive training video was provided for council members. In other discussions, the council addressed 2024 sewer claims. Several ordinances were on the agenda, including new regulations for solar energy systems and lead-based paint inspections and certifications. No public comments were made during hearings for these ordinances.

The council approved the consent agenda, and reports were delivered by various township officials, including the Township administrator, clerk, mayor, solicitor’s office, and engineer’s office. Council members also reported on local issues, such as flooding, fire department ceremonies, and Earth Day events.

During the public comment period, resident Raymond Branch raised a concern regarding a sewage backup at his property, claiming damages exceeding $50,000 due to alleged negligence and lack of maintenance on sewage lines. He appealed to the council for support in his claim against the insurance company. Another resident, Mary Janice West, questioned the township’s affordable housing obligations and the program’s legal context, which led to an explanation of the affordable housing program’s legal underpinnings, including its adherence to state regulations and the Supreme Court’s Mount Laurel decision.