The board expressed notable disappointment with private landowners’ lack of interest in offering sites for the new senior center. The members discussed the due diligence required for these sites, including seeking legal opinions and organizing meetings with relevant parties. They explored the possibility of improving access to a particular site through cooperation with Mass development.

Additionally, the board supported involving the Devens Enterprise Commission’s U air Representatives in a project on air property, recognizing their input as potentially beneficial for advancing the project. The recent rain-induced closure of an area and subsequent cleanup operations by the Department of Public Works (DPW) were mentioned, alongside considerations for railroad crossings and criteria for such crossings at the site. The board delved into environmental designations, the process of obtaining permits, and working with state agencies for approvals. The importance of involving the Conservation Commission and Conservation Land in the project was acknowledged, illustrated by a real-life challenge involving a building next to the transfer station and a natural heritage line.

The discussion on the contract with Catelyn architecture was a focal point, with the board members reviewing, commenting, and editing the proposed agreement. The necessity for Select Board approval of such contracts was debated. The board emphasized the importance of the architect working within specific constraints to prevent future issues and the need for public input in determining the building’s size and program. There was consensus on the flexibility of the building’s design to accommodate changing needs over time. The town manager aimed to finalize the contract with the architect by the end of the following week.

Public input emerged as a recurring theme, with the board acknowledging its significance in determining the program for the building. A recent meeting at the senior center led by Katie highlighted the site selection process’s status and the potential for public hearings and surveys conducted by the architect. A community member’s suggestion to locate the senior center at State Mary cemetery raised concerns about environmental impact and space constraints. Another community member voiced concerns about the lack of public participation in the decision-making process, calling for increased community support and interest.

The board also contemplated potential sites for the new facility, considering aspects such as the impact on the Department of Public Works and preparedness for questions regarding environmental impact. The next meeting’s scheduling and logistical matters, such as using a different Zoom meeting ID for future gatherings to provide more flexibility, were discussed.