During the meeting, there was a review of a redline document initially submitted by Eartham, with members noting that it could serve as a baseline for further discussions. The committee examined various aspects of the document, particularly the change from “board of Selectmen” to “select board,” reflecting a modernized language approach. Other debated terms included “development plan,” “proposed routes,” and whether to retain or remove “Center Trail” from the document. The conversation highlighted differing opinions on the extent of language that should be included and the committee’s role in construction and maintenance planning. Emphasis was placed on the need for the committee to develop a comprehensive set of recommendations for the select board, including cost and maintenance estimates.

The debate regarding the Center Trail was particularly notable due to its historical significance. Some members voiced the need to preserve the trail’s legacy, while others advocated for more flexibility in the committee’s future options. This resulted in a vote to keep the Center Trail within the committee’s charge, but with altered language from “shall” to “may” to allow for adaptability.

Further discussions revolved around the committee’s operational procedures, including the election of officers and adherence to open meeting and public records laws. There was a sense of concern from one member about the rigorous level of documentation required, which they likened to feeling like “an undisciplined teenager.”

Another focal point of the meeting was the recommendation to introduce two additional officers to the committee: a treasurer and a secretary. This suggestion aimed at improving minute-taking consistency and enhancing transparency to the public. The committee members deliberated on the necessity and feasibility of publicly maintaining a list of future agenda items and reaching agreement on topics for the next meeting’s agenda by a majority vote. The discussion concluded with a motion to amend the language of the requirement, softening the demand for a majority vote. However, the committee decided to postpone the final decision on this matter to a later date, with a tentative meeting set after the town meeting.