The proposed rezoning of the Tomoka Oaks property emerged as a issue, sparking extensive debate among commissioners and residents alike. The property, with a storied history as a community recreational space and social hub, became the focal point of discussions about development rights, community character, and environmental considerations. The planning board had recommended against the amendment.

During the meeting, the Tomoka Oaks Homeowners Association successfully petitioned for party intervenor status, arguing that the proposed development would affect its members with increased traffic, loss of open space, and negative impacts on natural resources. Despite the contention from the legal representative for Tomoka Reserve, the commission granted this status to the association, allowing them a more substantial role in the rezoning process.

The applicant’s attorney presented a case for the zoning map amendment, emphasizing the legal implications and the need to assign a zoning designation to the property to facilitate development rights. The attorney argued that the lack of a current zoning designation was not permissible under the law. In contrast, the party intervener’s attorney and a professional planner, Mark Corret, delved into the criteria for zoning issues and the analysis of a zoning map amendment, focusing on the application’s consistency with the land development code and the comprehensive plan.

Residents voiced strong opposition to the proposed rezoning, fearing it would lead to a degradation of the neighborhood’s character, increased traffic, noise pollution, and a strain on resources. Many highlighted the sentimental value of the golf course and criticized the developers for prioritizing profit over community well-being. The community’s concerns ranged from the potential devaluation of homes to safety issues and the preservation of green spaces. The speakers called for the commissioners to prioritize the interests of the existing community and maintain alignment with the city’s comprehensive plan and land development code.

In a marked display of community engagement, several residents, including Ellen Cook and Haley Osborne, addressed the commission, outlining their worries about the potential ramifications of the development. They cited traffic congestion, wildlife preservation, and the unjust depreciation of property values as issues. Others, like David Kohley, acknowledged the challenging position of the commission but advocated for the property rights of the new owners.

The commission also addressed a number of other items during the meeting. Three 7-Eleven locations successfully requested special exceptions for electronic changeable copy signs for gasoline prices. The resolutions for these signs were approved unanimously, with Commissioner Sargent inquiring about the sign change frequency and Deputy Mayor Briley noting that electronic signs had become the standard for gas stations. Commissioner Tolland suggested revisiting the regulations around electronic signage to accommodate technological advancements.

Additionally, a resolution authorizing a mural ownership agreement for the installation of a mural on West Granada Boulevard was approved unanimously. The Ormond Beach Art District board had recommended approval, aligning with the city’s interest in enhancing the downtown area’s aesthetic appeal.

The City Manager discussed various community concerns and initiatives and proposed appointing an alternate to the opiate abatement task force. The commission also approved the calling of a primary municipal election for August 20, 2024, and a regular municipal election on November 5, 2024.