The meeting emphasized the impact of square footage decisions on MSBA grants, noting that the MSBA only acknowledges eligible square footage at the schematic design phase, which can present challenges. The Committee examined the costs exceeding MSBA’s reimbursement limit of $550 per square foot, with actual costs ranging from $700 to $1,000 per square foot. The importance of aligning with the MSBA’s criteria was highlighted by the presentation of various school models, particularly a new 665-student school, and the need for classrooms to meet not only current educational standards but also the district’s goals for inclusivity and flexibility.

The Committee also addressed the recent changes in the MSBA’s green incentive points program, which now offers a 3% increase for schools committing to all-electric energy sources. The potential long-term benefits versus the upfront costs of achieving LEED indoor air quality points was another focus, as well as the limitations on MSBA reimbursements for site work, which is capped at 8% of project costs. However, it was mentioned that this cap could be extended with community support for certain elements, and that third-party funding, including Community Preservation Act (CPA) funds, could be incorporated into the project budget.

A significant portion of the discussion centered around the educational guidelines for spaces in the schools, with attention given to the undersized conditions of classrooms compared to state guidelines. The Committee explored the implications of these discrepancies on funding and the potential need for more flexible and inclusive models for classroom activities. The design elements of the new school building, including the acoustics in the cafeteria, the size of science rooms, and the inclusion of special education program spaces, were thoroughly reviewed, emphasizing the need to reduce noise levels and maintain eligibility for reimbursement.

Special education space requirements, such as sensory rooms, were also discussed, with the acknowledgment that further review and discussion were necessary to balance district needs with reimbursement eligibility. The Committee engaged in a detailed examination of the potential consolidation of schools, considering the benefits of reduced facility maintenance and operating costs alongside concerns about safety and the impact on educational quality.

Renovation options, particularly at Glenbrook, were debated, including the challenges of maintaining ceiling heights, temporary relocation of students, and the MSBA’s preference for renovations over new constructions. The possibility of a new school at Glenbrook, which would require demolishing the existing structure and dealing with logistical issues of student relocation, was also a topic of discussion.

The Committee reviewed various site options, ultimately deciding to remove one from consideration due to environmental and legal constraints. They highlighted the need for further cost information before making decisions and planned a leadership meeting and visioning session to discuss next steps.