The fiscal health of Dighton was a focal point of the meeting, as the Selectmen worked diligently to close a $240,000 budget shortfall. The Finance Committee’s additional cuts of $40,000 ameliorated the situation, but a remaining gap of approximately $21,000 necessitated further discussion. The board considered options such as further budget cuts, a debt exclusion for fiscal year 2026, and utilizing free cash to balance the budget for fiscal year 2025. Recognizing the importance of a balanced budget for the town’s financial standing, especially during the tax rate finalization process, the Selectmen aimed to finalize budget recommendations and warrant articles promptly to meet upcoming deadlines.

Departmental budgets were methodically reviewed, starting with a motion to recommend the moderator’s salary at $500, which passed without discussion. However, the Selectmen’s own budget sparked debate, particularly concerning the salary lines. The discussion unfolded with concerns that recommending the entire budget might appear self-serving. Conversely, it was argued that the Selectmen should provide guidance to the public, as the Finance Committee sought their recommendation. Ultimately, it was decided to recommend the Selectmen’s budget as proposed by the Town Administrator, taking into account that the issue of salary lines would be revisited when discussing the warrant article for setting elected officials’ salaries.

The board also set a “drop-dead” date to finalize budget recommendations and warrant articles, stressing the need to balance the operational budget before considering capital funding. Plans were made to meet jointly with the Finance Committee to reach a consensus and ensure all steps were taken to meet the deadlines.

In addition to budgetary discussions, the board examined the Town Administrator’s performance, where Mr. Mullen received commendations for his dedication and successful efforts in securing grants and savings for the town. Members generally rated him highly in various performance areas, with some noting the need for improved communication and performance reviews. One member shared a personal narrative of Mr. Mullen’s supportive leadership, further underscoring his positive impact on the town’s administration.

The meeting also delved into community concerns, including a debate over the authority to recommend the Cemetery Department budget and discussions around proposed bylaws concerning the hiring process for police chiefs, updates from the commission on disability, and land use project fees. Additionally, a public input session heard from a Board of Assessors representative regarding the senior tax exemption and a citizens petition about town administrative removal. Concerns were raised about the public’s role in providing feedback on town officials and the evaluation process.

Another point of discussion was a recent oversight that left the fire department out of a proclamation. While one member expressed regret for the omission, it was later clarified to have been an intentional decision made by the fire chief.