The proposed self-storage facility drew discussion from the commission, with members debating the size and number of storage units and buildings. The lack of a clear landscaping plan was a concern, as the commission underscored the importance of buffering between the facility and neighboring residences to mitigate visual impact and preserve local aesthetics. The absence of information on impervious cover was also noted, which could have implications for local drainage and runoff patterns.

Another concern raised was the absence of a lighting plan, which could lead to light pollution that not only affects nearby residents but also nocturnal wildlife. The commission discussed the need for a plan outlining the type of lighting to be used, its intensity, and measures to prevent light spillage into surrounding areas.

The discussion became more technical as the commission members delved into the specifics of the proposed construction, including the surface type and septic system. They stressed the need for a review of these details to ensure environmental safety and compliance with local regulations. Additionally, the commission considered the need for architectural standards for any proposed fence around the facility, emphasizing the significance of maintaining the character of the area.

The commission’s review of other applications also highlighted their diligence in examining environmental concerns. For the ZB2 24-3 application, the commission had no comment after determining that wetlands were not affected by the construction of a single-family home. However, for ZB2 24-5, which involved a 420 square foot addition to an existing residence, there was a brief deliberation about the impact of the addition and whether it would necessitate additional permits or variances.

The meeting also touched on old business, including an update on the grant for Piney Hollow and the Green Acres program. The commission members discussed the status of the grant and the potential efforts needed for cleanup at Piney Hollow and Malaga Lake Park. The possibility of engaging the Girl Scouts for assistance with the cleanup was mentioned, although some members expressed frustration over the lack of response to outreach efforts.

A proposed addition to a home on Fourth Avenue that may encroach on township-owned land was debated, raising questions about the Environmental Commission’s jurisdiction. Additionally, the commission reviewed a zoning board application for a single-family home on a non-conforming lot, discussing the placement of the well and septic system and considering whether to comment on the application.

The commission contemplated the logistics of documenting missing environmental markers and participating in the upcoming Bird Quest event. The necessity for a mailbox specifically for the Environmental Commission was also raised. A point of discussion was the need for a liaison to the planning board, though the qualifications for such a candidate were not detailed.

Planning for Community Day was addressed, though confusion about the event’s date led to a brief exchange among members. Additionally, the slow internet connection at the meeting venue was noted as a point of concern.

The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn at 8:39 p.m. There were reminders about time constraints and potential scheduling conflicts with other meetings.