The case that garnered attention involved Bianca Marino’s request for three variances for a proposed home renovation. The renovation entailed reconfiguring the primary bath and closet, along with adding space above the home office, which used to be an old porch. The variances sought were for side yard setback, combined side yard, and floor area ratio. The architect presented visual aids to help the board understand the existing conditions and the proposed changes, while the board examined historical records to assess the suitability of the variances.

Another case was the proposal by Michael and Kristen Applebaum to replace an existing accessory structure with a new one. The project also planned to reduce patio area and increase lawn space, which involved discussions around the dimensions, setbacks, and the impact of the proposed structure on adjacent properties.

The board also reviewed a proposal for a second-floor addition and the removal of a concrete pad, which would result in a 2.6% reduction in lot coverage. Positive comments were received from the historic preservation commission, and concerns regarding the preservation of existing trees during construction were addressed. The applicant committed to consulting with the city forester to ensure the trees’ protection.

A detailed proposal for the removal of an inground trampoline and a portion of a patio to be replaced with grass and a new open-sided structure featuring multiple amenities was also examined. The board emphasized the need for structural calculations and the approval of the building department for a retaining wall included in the plan.

The relocation of a shed and the potential requirement for a new seepage pit or stormwater management system sparked debate. Members raised the need for a more plans, including the location of the seepage pit and soil test results. The board decided to adjourn the discussion to a future meeting, expecting the applicant to address these issues comprehensively.

Discussions also included concerns about the visual impact of air conditioning units and a generator, with the board suggesting landscaping solutions for screening. The architect provided a rationale for the proposed location of new structures and discussed the lack of plumbing in the proposed bar area.

The board addressed the design of a proposed pergola and structure exceeding the allowed size on Biew Avenue. The applicant’s engineer discussed the stormwater management plan and the steep slope analysis, confirming that the proposed stormwater management exceeded requirements.

Concerns regarding the potential noise and light impact from a proposed lighting and sound system in a rear yard were voiced. The applicant assured the board about the orientation of speakers and the minimization of light spillage. Questions about the engineering aspects, such as the function of coltech units and the suitability of the proposed cross-section for a retaining wall, were raised and clarified.