The proposed Ocoee Pickleball Pro Complex was described as a facility that would encompass approximately six acres and feature 44 courts, a championship court, spectator seating, and additional amenities such as rehab facilities, workspaces, and food services. The project manager emphasized the growing popularity of pickleball and the lack of adequate facilities in the region.

However, residents from nearby neighborhoods strongly opposed the plan. Their concerns were primarily about the noise generated by the sport, which they claimed could disrupt the tranquility of the area and potentially devalue their properties. One resident, despite being a pickleball player, stressed the importance of the city addressing noise concerns. Another individual pointed out the negative implications for local wildlife. Suggestions were made for an indoor facility to minimize noise pollution and to better integrate with the community’s existing character.

During the discussion, a resident urged commissioners to experience the noise at existing pickleball courts to understand the potential impact better. The project manager responded with proposed noise mitigation measures, including the strategic placement of courts and the use of noise barrier equipment. Despite these assurances, skepticism remained among some commissioners about the project’s feasibility, given the noise issues and the number of courts planned.

The commission’s debate extended to the broader issue of property development within the city. Frustration was voiced over the lack of desired amenities, such as restaurants, and concerns were raised about the development of damaged properties into commercial or residential spaces. Discussions touched upon a plan that could potentially introduce close to 700 apartments into the area.

In addition to the pickleball complex, the commission addressed other significant city matters. They voted on the reappointment and rearrangement of members on the planning zoning commission, with some confusion about the process eventually resolved. The commission also expressed dissatisfaction with the city’s holiday lighting and discussed plans for upgrading decorations, seeking consensus on design, placement, budget, and timeline.

Tensions surfaced when one commissioner addressed another’s attendance at an HOA meeting, raising concerns about potential violations of the Sunshine Law. The commissioner in question apologized, explaining their presence was for informational purposes. Safety along the West Orange Trail, the status of foster care facilities, and the communication of programs for foster care youth were also on the agenda. Commissioners highlighted the importance of teacher appreciation, hurricane preparedness, and the recent success of the Ocoee Music Fest.

Furthermore, the commission discussed the need for enhanced code enforcement, especially on Saturdays, and the control of activities at the lakefront park. The issue of semi-trucks parking in the city was raised, emphasizing the necessity of law and code enforcement.