The topic of residency requirements emerged as a prominent point of discussion, with committee members pondering the implications on city governance and staff recruitment. The debate was multifaceted, touching on the current two-year residency requirement and its impact on the availability of affordable housing in Tarpon Springs. Members also considered the flexibility of these requirements during emergencies or personal issues. The possibility of department heads being subject to residency requirements was raised, triggering further debate on the necessity and potential impact on city operations.

Another major topic was the referendum on property purchases. One committee member pointed out that the existing $350,000 limit does not offer strong leverage when negotiating with property owners, suggesting a need to raise the limit to $750,000. The committee discussed the advantages and disadvantages of such an increase, including the potential lack of citizen support and the impact on the city’s financial planning and property negotiations.

The meeting also touched on the challenges associated with finding qualified individuals to serve on city boards like the Public Art Committee. The reinstatement of the Marine Commerce Commission was mentioned as an example, with difficulties noted in finding members who are both qualified and willing to commit. Further complicating the recruitment of board members, the issue of allowing individuals to serve on multiple boards was raised, with concerns about conflicts of interest and the potential creation of a “rogue board.”

The establishment of a maritime committee to address issues related to the Anclote River and the city’s commercial waterfront was suggested by one member. This proposal included a focus on navigation aspects and the incorporation of a sustainability plan and funding mechanisms into the charter. The creation of a land preservation fund was also proposed, with the inclusion of funding sources such as a potential tax for land preservation.

During the public comments section, concerns were raised about potential changes to the requirements for volunteer advisory boards. Members of the committee emphasized the volunteer nature of these boards and the challenges they face.

The committee debated the prioritization of capital improvement projects, like sidewalk improvements, and the potential inclusion of such priorities in the city charter. The allocation of funds for these projects was also discussed, along with the process of sealed bids for outside contractors and whether negotiations should be held in confidence.

The debate extended to invasive species management, specifically Brazilian peppers, with a recognition of the need for a proactive plan to address their impact on the community. Members also recommended identifying funding sources in the ballot language for property referendums to inform citizens about potential tax impacts.