The applicant’s representative presented extensive plans for structural changes to ensure the safety and flood compliance of the building. This included the installation of a steel frame, concrete second floor deck, and timber truss roof, reinforced with helical piles for stability. The representative addressed various concerns including noise, traffic, and the visual impact of the establishment. The board deliberated on the feasibility of proposed parking and transportation measures, including the placement of a sign for Uber and Lyft ridesharing services, and discussed how these would affect the local traffic and parking situation.

To mitigate neighborhood concerns, the applicant outlined concessions such as the coordination with city and police departments to manage parking issues, security measures to manage the dispersal of patrons at closing, and the installation of quieter trash collection processes. The board also discussed the installation of a fence along the property line and the accessibility of emergency exits, which included a debate about the practicality of moving dumpsters in case of an emergency.

During the meeting, the public had the opportunity to express their concerns. Residents voiced apprehension about the prospect of the C2 district becoming a hub for nightlife and its potential to disrupt the quality of life, along with worries about trash operations, increased traffic, parking challenges, and the impact on property values. The board responded by highlighting the expert testimony that supported the proposal’s compliance with city ordinances, assuring that construction plans would be shared with the community once finalized.

Additionally, the board considered a request for a C variance relief for fence location in the S60 zoning district. This debate included a discussion on a legal case related to fence relocation and the contemplation of a Whispering Woods hearing to resolve the dispute. A new plan was presented by an attorney which proposed moving the fence back, incorporating landscaping, and ensuring that the fence height did not exceed 5 feet to minimize the visual impact and address the board’s concerns.

The meeting also involved a review of the conditions set forth in letters from concerned parties, which included limitations on outdoor seating and the installation of a fence. The board voted on the application for the wine and tequila bar, with some members supporting the project for its potential community benefits, while others expressed reservations about its impact on the surrounding area and adherence to ordinances.