The meeting began with a discussion on the Reading Municipal Light Department’s Electric Vehicle chargers at the Reading Public Library. While the number of charging sessions for the standard level two charger and the newer DC fast charger was similar, the fast charger’s shorter charge times and higher energy output were noted. However, challenges related to grant requirements were identified, specifically the need to provide a separate accessible parking spot for the DC fast charger. Concerns regarding parking availability and charger plug compatibility with different electric vehicle models were raised. Some board members requested regular updates on the usage of the EV chargers to monitor their popularity and impact.

The board then approved a Pride statement after debating the use of the Oxford comma and language specificity. The statement is to be posted on the town’s website and accompanied by a press release for Pride Month, showing the board’s support for the LGBTQ+ community.

The ad hoc Library Landscape Committee presented preliminary results and design concepts from the landscaping architectural firm Activitas. The concepts included a paved patio, pergola structure, seating, and a small stage to enhance outdoor library activities, based on survey data indicating community interest. A preliminary cost estimate for hardscaping and retaining wall work was discussed, with the initial figure of $1.3 million potentially being reduced to around $750,000. The committee emphasized that taxpayer money would not be used, with funding sought from grants or donations. Next steps for the project include community engagement, cost reduction strategies, and funding source exploration.

Policy changes in the library were also on the agenda. The local history room policy was updated to focus more on policy than procedure, allowing the use of cell phones and clarifying rules about bringing bags into the room. Additionally, the board debated a policy regarding access to delicate materials and addressed concerns about potential deliberate damage. Staff discretion in such matters was upheld as important. The success of a disruptive behavior policy, especially among younger patrons, was noted.

In the director’s report, updates on the repair of exterior lockers and the success of recent events such as an animal extravaganza were mentioned. The susceptibility of exterior lockers to sun damage was addressed, with possible solutions including additional signage and regular staff checks being discussed. Furthermore, the redistribution of fish and the introduction of a turtle to the library’s terrarium were updated.

Upcoming events at the library include a speaker series and a training program on First Amendment rights, social media, internet privacy, and confidentiality. A staff member reported securing a grant for a course on libraries in aging 101 and detailed a new library speaker consortium. The consortium’s cost, funding, and promotion were discussed, with the first program scheduled for June 3. Board members expressed their support and interest in the new consortium, recognizing its potential to draw diverse audiences and the possibility for future funding from the foundation.

Lastly, the board laid out future agenda items, highlighting the busy June schedule with updates on summer programming, a Community DEA assessment update, a history policy vote, election of new officers, and discussions on future dates and the holiday schedule. A reminder was given about the last Sunday the library would be open before the summer and the decision to promote it as such.