The architecture team presented a matrix and site selection criteria for the board to fill out. They emphasized the need for consensus and multiple meetings to discuss the selection process. The board considered the topography, existing structures, and challenges in site development, such as the presence of hazardous materials, wetlands, and utility access. A discussion on the vacant board seat highlighted the absence of applicants despite outreach efforts.

The debate extended to the layout and design of the center. Members discussed the inclusion of a multi-purpose room, gym, fitness area, wellness area, and commercial kitchen, along with parking space design to accommodate senior drivers. Concerns arose about the impact of fast-moving traffic on Washington Street and the need to consider traffic patterns in site selection. Members also contemplated the challenges of site development, including dealing with ledge and potential contamination.

Attention was given to the design of the restrooms. The board discussed the fitness room layout and equipment, emphasizing the need for proper programming and certification for facility usage.

The integration of technology infrastructure, such as networking cabling and Wi-Fi, was considered, with the board opting for the town’s provider to handle these aspects and emphasizing the importance of security measures. The board deliberated the advantages of a single-story versus a two-story structure for the community center, focusing on accessibility and space utilization.

The allocation of space for administrative functions was also discussed, considering the addition of a town social worker and a veterans agent. The board emphasized the need for private and flexible workspace to accommodate these roles.

In terms of space utilization, the board members questioned the efficiency of mechanical space allocation and discussed design preferences for classrooms, exterior storage, and outdoor spaces. The labeling of restrooms as unisex and the needs of the Disabilities Commission, particularly equipment lending programs, were also addressed.

The board considered the practicality of electric wheelchairs and the need for special charging stations, with the Disabilities Commission expressing interest in leading the initiative. A covered walkway or porch for indoor walking during inclement weather was proposed, and the importance of community involvement in decision-making was emphasized. The board outlined a plan for future meetings to avoid costly delays, committing to detailed meeting notes for accuracy.

The timing of the town meeting was debated, considering a special meeting in addition to the regular one. The board discussed the timeline for bidding and contractor selection and the importance of site visits and information gathering for future meetings.