The meeting was marked by extensive public comments regarding the proposed changes to the Livery ordinance, which governs the operation of charter boats. Individuals from the boating community voiced their apprehensions about exempting bareboat charters from the ordinance, pointing to the differences in regulations and inspections between six-passenger vessels and those carrying more than six. Concerns ranged from the potential for uncontrolled growth and safety hazards to unfair competition and the impact on established businesses.

Captain Kyle, a six-pack charter vessel operator, emphasized the dangers of loosening regulations, noting the possibility of increased capacity on his vessel and the consequent unfairness to his peers. Allan Staples Oliver, a third-generation charter commercial fisherman, spoke to the importance of protecting the local charter fleet. Scott Robson, a pontoon boat owner, opposed exemptions for pontoon boats, citing the lack of rules for such vessels. Captain Brandy Miles, a multi-vessel charter operator, advocated for the existing medallion system and the importance of strict guidelines.

Jonathan Hodges, co-owner of East Pass Sailing Company, compared the rigorous COI inspections for charter vessels to the less courtesy inspections, while Justin, a charter boat operator since 2005, emphasized the need for the council to review medallion laws. Stan Phillips, who transitioned to operating an over-six boat, underscored the extensive inspection process and the investments necessary for maintaining larger boats.

The council engaged in a nuanced discussion on the regulation of charter fishing, with a public member drawing parallels to online booking services and another resident questioning the scope of council decision-making. The issue of insurance for bareboat charters was also raised, with emphasis on the challenges in obtaining insurance for charters carrying over six people. Recommendations were proposed to refine the definition and regulation of bareboat charters, and a Coast Guard representative provided insights into federal and local regulatory differences. The need for clarity and consistency in definitions and rules was a focal point, as was the alignment with Florida state rules and statutes.

Further, the council debated the moratorium on medallions in the harbor. Safety, parking, and the number of vessels were concerns, as was the potential impact on businesses. It was noted that any potential changes would require multiple public hearings and would not be immediate.

Amidst the vessel regulation debate, the council covered other significant items, including the approval of transitioning to a digital timekeeping and payroll system. A combined contract related to infrastructure improvements on Highway 98 and a study of the boardwalk under the bridge was approved, with the conversation noting a cost-saving measure and additional funding requirements. The bid for landscaping and maintenance services was discussed, with the inclusion of monthly property inspections and consequences for uncorrected issues.

The council also approved the FY 25 budget calendar with amendments and discussed the Crystal Beach acquisition and the upcoming SRS VI Workshop. Public hearings addressed ordinances for right-of-way protection during construction and the progress of the Tarpon Beach area and pickleball courts. Several committee appointments were made, and an RFP for Clement Taylor Renovations was announced.