The board’s conversation about the bed and breakfast application was extensive, focusing on the property’s layout and how it might fit within the town’s existing definitions and regulations. The property in question was described as a separate walled-off unit, potentially qualifying as a separate apartment due to its distinct utilities and kitchenette. Concerns arose regarding the potential impact on the residential district, with some board members contemplating the long-term effects of approving additional units in buildings.

During the discussion, the board weighed the possibility of imposing conditions such as annual inspections, occupancy limits, and parking regulations. The applicant was questioned about the property’s egress and parking arrangements, and there was talk of consulting the town’s regulations to ensure the establishment met the requirements for a bed and breakfast. While some members favored the special permit, others sought further information and consistency in the application of the town’s bylaws, particularly regarding short-term rentals.

The regulation of short-term rentals, specifically the duration and occupancy limits, was another significant topic. The board deliberated over the appropriate rental duration, with proposals ranging from 30 to 60 days. The maximum occupancy was also discussed, with the board deciding to impose a limit of four people, including both adults and children, and granting the building department, the South Deerfield fire department, and the Board of Health the authority to conduct inspections with notice as necessary.

In another key matter, the board addressed a separate application for a special permit for Hampshire Lumber’s construction of a new 12,000 square foot building adjacent to an existing structure. The project raised questions about parking and the impact on the gateway to the Center South Deerfield District. To address concerns, the applicant presented updates including improved screening, vegetation, and a sidewalk connection to the main walk. The board also discussed the need for appropriate measures to mitigate any negative effects on the district.

The discussion about the new building for Hamshaw Lumber on Elm Street included public comments, with a property owner expressing interest due to the proximity to their property. The board considered the project’s timeline, lighting impact on neighbors, and the ownership and maintenance of parking areas. A vote was held to approve the special permit for the project, with conditions related to the timeline, maintenance, lighting, and regulatory compliance.