Highland Park Rent Control Board Tackles Ordinance Amendments

The Highland Park Rent Control Board recently convened to address matters concerning the rent control ordinance, the challenges of enforcement, and the implications for landlords and tenants. The board delved into the intricacies of the ordinance, discussing potential amendments aimed at clarifying language and jurisdiction, especially regarding landlord-tenant harassment. They also debated the use of the Consumer Price Index for rent increases, the inclusion of luxury apartments under rent control, and the awareness of ordinance rights among tenants.

An issue that took center stage was the need for amendments to the existing rent control ordinance. The board examined sections that required clarification, particularly those related to the board’s jurisdiction in landlord-tenant harassment cases. The board agreed that certain language in the ordinance might be more suited to criminal law enforcement rather than their governance. They discussed the approach to handling such cases in the future.

The discussion also covered the process of gathering and evaluating documentation in hardship appeal cases. The board reflected on a recent hardship appeal case, which highlighted the struggles both landlords and tenants face due to the new rent ordinance implemented during their negotiations. The case involved scrutinizing the landlord’s financial records and reaching a consensus that considered the interests of both parties. The outcome of the case prompted suggestions to refine the board’s tone during discussions to prevent confrontational situations. Additionally, there was a consensus on the need to improve ordinance enforcement mechanisms and the documentation process for future cases.

Another point of debate was the application of the rent control ordinance to various property types, including luxury apartments. The board addressed the concern that tenants paying higher rents might not be covered by rent control. This led to a discussion about the board’s mission and goals, and how to ensure that tenants are informed about their rights under the ordinance.

The board confronted the challenge of tracking and ensuring compliance with rent control regulations across all rental properties. It was recognized that accurately identifying rental units, especially those owned by smaller landlords, is difficult. The focus was placed on raising awareness among landlords and tenants about the regulations. During the public comment period, a small landlord shared a case where an attempted rent increase based on market analysis was rejected under current regulations. This prompted a proposal for a “landland appeal to non-hardship tenants” method, which spurred a debate on the implications of such a method, including the potential for a surge in appeals.

In terms of rent adjustments, there was a discussion on the appropriate percentage increase in rents, with figures ranging from 2% to 3.5%. The pandemic’s disruption to the rental market added complexity to the decision-making process, with concerns about the impact of the board’s decisions on the market. The board also considered the inclusion of different types of properties under rent control.

Enforcement issues were also at the forefront, with the board acknowledging the difficulty of enforcing rent control without accurate data, particularly for unregistered properties. The dynamic nature of the local rental market was emphasized, considering that many property owners are not career landlords. The board weighed the potential negative outcomes of rent control, such as landlords refraining from making essential property improvements, which could affect tenant safety and maintenance standards.

A specific case involving a tenant who was unexpectedly evicted while subleasing a condo was brought to attention. The board also discussed the uncharted territory of Airbnb rentals and their unknown impact on the rental market. Finally, the debate extended to the concept of introducing a third type of hardship for landlords under specific circumstances and examining rent increases on a case-by-case basis.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.
Mayor:
Elsie Foster
Rent Control Board Officials:

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country:

Meeting Date
Filter by bodytypes
Agricultural Advisory Committee
Airport Advisory Board
Art and Culture Board
Beach Committee
Bike and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Board of Elections
Board of Health
Borough Council
Building Committee
Cannabis Control Board
Cemetery Commission
Charter Revision Commission
Child and Family Services Board
City Council
City Identity Committee
Code Enforcement Board
College Board of Trustees
Community Appearance Board
Community Preservation Committee
Community Redevelopment Agency
County Council
Disability Advisory Committee
Economic Development Board
Elderly Affairs Board
Electric Advisory Board
Environmental Commission
Financial Oversight Board
Historic Preservation Commission
Housing Authority
Human Relations Committee
Human Resources Committee
Insurance Fund
Land Use Board
Library Board
Licensing Board
Mental Health Commission
Municipal Alliance
Open Space Commission
Oversight and Review Committee
Parent Advisory Board
Parking Authority
Parks and Gardens Commission
Parks Commission
Pension Board
Planning Board
Police Review Board
Port Authority
Property Assessment Board
Public Safety Committee
Recreation Commission
Redevelopment Agency
Rent Control Board
Rent Leveling Board
School Board
Sewerage Authority
Shade Tree Commission
Special Magistrate
Taxation & Revenue Advisory Committee
Tourism Board
Trails Committee
Transportation Board
Utility Board
Value Adjustment Board
Veterans Committee
Water Control Board
Women's Advisory Committee
Youth Advisory Committee
Zoning Board
Filter by County
FL
Bay County
Bradford County
Brevard County
Broward County
Clay County
Duval County
Escambia County
Gulf County
Hendry County
Highlands County
Hillsborough County
Indian River County
Lake County
Lee County
Leon County
Levy County
Liberty County
Manatee County
Marion County
Martin County
Miami-Dade County
Monroe County
Okaloosa County
Orange County
Osceola County
Palm Beach County
Pasco County
Pinellas County
Polk County
Putnam County
Santa Rosa County
Sarasota County
Seminole County
St. Johns County
Taylor County
Volusia County
Walton County
MA
Barnstable County
Berkshire County
Bristol County
Essex County
Franklin County
Hampden County
Hampshire County
Middlesex County
Norfolk County
Plymouth County
Suffolk County
Worcester County
MN
Anoka County
Becker County
Beltrami County
Benton County
Blue Earth County
Brown County
Carver County
Cass County
Chippewa County
Chisago County
Clay County
Cook County
Crow Wing County
Dakota County
Freeborn County
Goodhue County
Grant County
Hennepin County
Isanti County
Itasca County
Kanabec County
Kandiyohi County
Koochiching County
Lac Qui Parle County
Lyon County
Mcleod County
Morrison County
Mower County
Nicollet County
Olmsted County
Pipestone County
Polk County
Ramsey County
Rice County
Scott County
Sherburne County
Sibley County
St Louis County
Stearns County
Steele County
Waseca County
Washington County
Wright County
NJ
Atlantic County
Bergen County
Burlington County
Camden County
Cape May County
Cumberland County
Essex County
Gloucester County
Hudson County
Hunterdon County
Mercer County
Middlesex County
Monmouth County
Morris County
Ocean County
Passaic County
Somerset County
Sussex County
Union County
Warren County
NY
Bronx County
Kings County
New York County
Queens County
Richmond County
TN
Shelby County
Filter by sourcetypes
Minutes
Recording