The delay in opening cannabis businesses was a focal point of discussion, with board members debating the introduction of a timeline for businesses to commence operations after receiving approval. This delay was attributed to financial barriers that applicants faced, which led to a suggestion to potentially vacate the resolution of support for those who have not met opening deadlines. The idea of implementing a renewal process and modifying the fee structure was also brought up, with the intent to motivate applicants to expedite the opening of their businesses and contribute to the city’s economy.

Community engagement emerged as another key issue, with the board highlighting the necessity for cannabis businesses to participate in neighborhood associations and establish meaningful connections with local community groups and schools. The importance of genuine community involvement was underscored as a critical factor for the success of the business in Jersey City’s distinct cultural and historical context.

Security concerns were also addressed, with particular attention to the potential risks associated with the large amounts of cash handled by cannabis businesses. Applicants reassured the board of their commitment to prioritizing security, including the implementation of visible security measures and surveillance cameras.

The board praised the efforts of Maris New Jersey LLC for their commitment to hiring a 100% local workforce. The applicant’s plans for diversity and inclusion, job fairs, and hiring practices were discussed, with the intention to bolster the local economy and provide employment opportunities to residents. Details about community engagement, outreach efforts, and future community events were also presented.

In regards to the Blossom dispensary, the board deliberated on the change of ownership, which was approved by the CRC. The dispensary had opened on a temporary basis, and after reviewing the information provided by the majority owner and their attorney, the board voted to accept the dispensary. Moreover, the board noted the unusual absence of the Leaf Joint representatives and agreed to send a notice for their next appearance.

The commitment to Hudson County Community College was another topic of discussion, with a scholarship fund dedicated to cannabis education being established.

The testimonies of various witnesses, including a CPA, a healthcare facility owner, and a security director with law enforcement experience, provided insights into the operational aspects of the proposed businesses. Their roles and relevant experiences were discussed, as well as their potential involvement and oversight of the cannabis establishments.

The meeting concluded with a discussion on the board’s attendance policies, referencing the municipal land use law concerning consecutive missed meetings. This revealed the board’s concern about the necessity for full member participation in decision-making processes and the potential impact of absences on the functioning of the board.