A detailed presentation by Dr. Rick Campbell from PayPoint outlined the methodology behind the salary study, emphasizing the use of market comparisons, organizational structure, and the knowledge, skills, and abilities required for each job title. Dr. Campbell’s presentation revealed that the study considered input from city employees and benchmarked the salaries against market rates. However, the data, collected in October of the previous year, did not account for subsequent pay adjustments by other municipalities, sparking debate among the commissioners about the need to consider recent changes in the market.

The discussion delved into the proposed salary schedule, which includes grades 1 through 20, and the process of determining these grades based on various factors. The Commission recognized the need to address salary shortfalls for challenging positions and contemplated a market-driven approach to the pay structure. Concerns were raised about the impact of salary adjustments on the city’s budget, with projections ranging from $250,000 to $300,000 depending on the percentile targeted for market competitiveness.

The “fog inspector” position, identified as being 10.7% below market average, became a focal point, highlighting the broader issue of underpayment across several job titles within the building department. The Commission debated whether to set the city’s pay scale at the 50th, 55th, or 60th percentile compared to other municipalities. Moreover, the potential budgetary implications of salary adjustments were discussed, with an emphasis on creating an attractive work environment beyond just compensation.

Moving beyond individual pay concerns, the Commission also addressed broader city matters. The review of the city’s comprehensive plan sparked debate over potential conflicts of interest with the contracted firm and the need for third-party review. The plan amendment aimed to align the city with statutory requirements and countywide rules, including Vision Zero and state-adopted flood risk requirements. This matter brought to light the challenges of balancing trust in the document’s integrity with the scrutiny required for such important city planning tools.

Another topic was the city’s parking meter ordinance, which has impacted businesses, particularly in the Pass-A-Grille area. Commissioners acknowledged the need for a review of parking issues, considering the challenges experienced across different districts. The discussion on parking did not result in a clear consensus on specific actions but established a direction for further review and consideration.

The City Commission’s meeting also touched on community engagement initiatives for City Government Week, including a bingo game and an essay contest, aimed at fostering civic involvement. Additionally, the City Manager proposed multiple shorter meetings for an upcoming budget workshop to ensure thorough discussion on budgetary issues, including the salary adjustments and their implications on the city’s finances.

Audience feedback featured prominently during the meeting, with city employee Ken Kpob expressing frustration over delays in the pay study results and audience member Deborah Shner raising concerns about language used by the city’s attorney.