The centerpiece of the discussions was the mixed-use building proposed for Ventnor Avenue, which ignited a detailed examination due to recent ordinance changes affecting the project. The applicant’s request for variances, particularly regarding parking and building height, was framed by the need to comply with flood elevation requirements and the desire to preserve the economic viability of the commercial space. The proposal, including 3300 square feet of commercial space and three residential units above, was reviewed, considering the intricacies of marrying elements from the old and new ordinances. Concerns over the six-foot front yard setback requirement, which could lead to a significant reduction in commercial space, were vigorously debated.

The board also evaluated the aesthetics of the proposed building, especially the sloping roof design, and deliberated on the practicality of the six-foot setback around the building. The applicant contended that this measure would unnecessarily sacrifice valuable commercial space without substantial benefits. The project’s architect and planner played a role, presenting the challenges faced due to the ordinance alteration during the pendency of the application and the subsequent design considerations. They argued for waivers based on the unique characteristics of the project, touching on aspects such as the circulation plan and stormwater management.

In other discussions, the board approved an application for a house lift on South Gilmore Circle, put forward by Michael and Stephanie Scalini. Designed to accommodate their expanding family, the project sought variances for the front yard setback, deck size, and an oversize garage. The application garnered support from both the board and public, emphasizing the value of family-friendly developments in the community.

The board’s agenda further included a case for 109 South ARG LLC, which sought C variant relief for a property affected by Hurricane Sandy. The applicant, Seth Leer, detailed the need for raising the house due to storm damage and future protection concerns. Variances relating to deck building height, setback requirements, and landscaping were discussed, with the board considering the architectural character and flood compliance of the project.

Additionally, the board tackled a new construction project adjacent to an existing residence, focusing on the impact of proposed deck elevations and the height of a bulkhead on storm protection and aesthetics. Debates ensued over the board’s jurisdiction concerning the bulkhead and whether its height should be conditioned upon approval.

The public comments segment brought forth a mix of support and concerns from residents and business owners regarding the mixed-use building project. Issues such as traffic flow, trash pickup, and the need for more commercial spaces were highlighted. A notable sentiment from a long-time resident reflected optimism in the project’s potential to revitalize the business district.