The debate on mooring regulations focused on Manchester Marine’s usage of town-owned moorings, which sparked concerns over fairness due to a 20-year waitlist for these moorings. Questions were raised about the legality of existing mooring fees and whether private businesses should be permitted to rent moorings from the town and resell them at a higher rate. The board contemplated enforcement mechanisms and the potential impact on other local businesses, emphasizing the need for input from the Harbor Advisory Committee. The discussion was tabled, with plans to revisit the issue in October after gathering more information from other harbors and inviting stakeholders to contribute to the dialogue.

The Select Board also engaged in a detailed examination of the town’s water and sewer rates. The introduction of a capital fee was a point of contention, as members considered whether it should encompass all capital expenses or only basic infrastructure costs. The impact of the fee on residents and the structure of the fees were key considerations, with the board requesting more information from the town engineer to assist in their decision-making process. Additionally, there was an exploration of simplifying the current tiered system and the possibility of consolidating water and sewer rates.

Further discussions on boat mooring and launch services revealed concerns about the management of the town hall boat ramp, staffing needs, and the introduction of launch service fees. The potential implementation of a per-ride fee for the launch service was debated, with board members considering the effects on seasonal pass holders and the prioritization of customers. The definition of immediate family in relation to state rules on mooring permits and the rental of moorings by boat yards were also topics of discussion, highlighting the need for a transparent and fair policy.

In addition to mooring and utility rate discussions, the meeting addressed the potential establishment of an Enterprise Fund for the Harbor Department. The board weighed the criteria for setting up such a fund and whether it should encompass various fees related to the waterways, including those for dredging. The decision on this matter was postponed, pending further understanding of the differences between a revolving fund and an Enterprise Fund, with a commitment to revisit the topic at the next meeting.

The board also covered a range of other municipal concerns. It reviewed and appointed new volunteers to the Open Space and Recreation Committee and the Cultural Committee, with the new appointees expressing their eagerness to contribute to the town’s cultural and recreational landscape. Moreover, the board examined the reorganization of its own members, designating a local newspaper as the alternate official newspaper for public notices.

Other administrative matters included the Parks and Recreation department’s need for funding through revolving funds, the approval of a new Thord Day Proclamation, and the Department of Public Works’ collaboration with the Council on Aging. Updates were provided on the Downtown Improvement Committee’s feedback session and the school committee’s external review of the special education program. Preparations for the Fourth of July parade and emergency management for potential wildfires and hurricanes were also discussed, alongside the grand opening of the town post site.