The Council’s conversation about the FY 2025 budget was comprehensive, covering salary allocations, department expenses, and the potential impact of an increased lifeguard pay rate. Mayor Nicholson presented the budget, emphasizing that increases were primarily due to contractual obligations or salary adjustments. He addressed concerns about health insurance costs rising post-COVID-19 and the city’s escalating retirement pension liability. A large increase in the Recreation Department budget aimed to meet current enrollment figures, but sustainability for the program was a concern.

Particular attention was given to the budget for outside counsel expenses. The trend of rising appropriations for outside legal representation was questioned, and a cut to the office expenses budget was supported by most council members. This move underscored a collective desire for greater transparency and accountability in fund allocation.

The council acknowledged the completion of high school for 140 students from Gardner High School and Gardner Academy, with graduates receiving congratulations during the meeting. However, the acknowledgment of academic milestones was brief compared to the more drawn-out discussions on city budgeting and staffing.

The lifeguard salary issue generated a robust dialogue. Some council members supported an increase, recognizing the pool’s significance and advocating for a salary study to ensure fair compensation. The mayor explained that the pay rate was influenced by factors such as revenue and staffing hours. A proposal to compare local lifeguard salaries with those in nearby communities was put forward to inform any decisions.

The discussions extended to other city positions, including the conservation agent and the assistant director of Community Development, funded through various sources like the Community Development Block Grant. The local building inspector’s transition from part-time to full-time status accounted for a salary increase. Further clarifications touched upon the deputy chief’s salary and parking meter maintenance expenses, which were managed by different city departments.

During the meeting, a council member inquired about the “oppos” listed in the budget, which was identified as a Captain’s salary. This prompted further exploration into staffing levels for the police and fire departments, with the mayor explaining that adjustments were made to align with national standards. Overtime for the Public Works department was also discussed, with the mayor noting that vacancies were covering the costs.

Professional services and EPA NPDES expenses in the engineering and public works department were another focal point. The recreation department’s budget increase was met with support from some council members who emphasized the importance of sustaining the program’s growth.