Central to the discussion was the ordinance’s alignment with the city’s master plan, particularly concerning affordable housing. The board’s planner, after reviewing relevant documents, including the master plan and downtown plan, concluded that the proposed rezoning is consistent with these overarching city plans. The board’s responsibility was to assess this consistency, and after deliberation, they approved a resolution affirming that the ordinance did not conflict with the city’s master plan.

The proposed district’s provisions have been crafted to support a mix of uses – from multifamily and townhouse developments to retail and office spaces. The overlay zone also stipulates a maximum density of 30 units per acre, which is a critical figure considering the city’s efforts to increase affordable housing options.

The meeting also touched upon the important role of public input in the process. While this review was not a public hearing, it was noted that citizens would have the opportunity to offer their perspectives at a forthcoming public hearing before the common council. This is a part of the process, as it allows for community engagement and input on the development that will affect their city.

A significant part of the board’s discussion revolved around the balance between adhering to the city’s existing plans and agreements and allowing for flexibility to accommodate diverse viewpoints and innovative ideas in future developments. This debate underscored the board members’ awareness of the need for both structure and adaptability in planning to address the city’s evolving needs.

The proposed ordinance also includes area and bulk requirements, which are critical to maintaining the character of the development. These include limitations on building lengths and heights designed to ensure that any new construction within the district remains in harmony with the surrounding environment.

The board’s review of the ordinance was a necessary step before any potential development applications are submitted for consideration.

The discussion also highlighted the anticipated public hearing before the common council, which will be a key opportunity for residents to engage with the planning process. The board emphasized that while the current meeting was strictly an administrative function, the public hearing would serve as a platform for residents to voice their opinions on the proposed developments.