One notable matter involved the in-depth examination of four potential water supply alternatives, which carried implications for the town’s water system and budget. The board did not consider the first alternative, which suggested no action, viable due to a current development moratorium and the need for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) treatment. The second alternative, which involved purchasing the Brook Street well from Somerset, was estimated to cost $52.8 million through 2039 and would increase raw water production capacity.

The third and fourth alternatives revolved around accessing water from the city of Taunton and a connection to Somerset, respectively. Consultants presented financial models showing the impact of each option on ratepayers, with projections indicating increases in residential customer bills by 2030, ranging from 32% to 80% depending on the alternative chosen. The fourth alternative, which proposed a wholesale supply from Somerset, was recommended by consultants as the best option due to its lower cost of $32.2 million through 2039 and the potential for regionalization and efficiency. This option would result in a 102% increase in the existing operations and maintenance budget.

The meeting also touched on the challenges posed by the new EPA proposed rule on MCL for PFOA, which could necessitate treatment at the water treatment plant. The potential for low-interest loans and loan forgiveness was mentioned as a relief measure for communities affected by the new regulations. Additionally, there was discussion about the possibility of entering into intermunicipal agreements for water supply, which typically last for 20-25 years.

The board discussed the potential consolidation of the district and the town, but preliminary data did not show significant advantages or cost savings, with current financial and infrastructural interactions between the district and town departments deemed sufficient. Legal implications and minor efficiencies were also highlighted, with recommendations for indirect costs, planned development work review processes, and improved communication between the district and town, including the presence of contact information on the town’s website.

There were concerns raised about the high cost of purchasing a well site and the need to explore other options, considering the town’s size and customer base. The topic of regional water supply was brought up, referencing successful regional agreements in other areas, and the impact of new regulations on grants and funding for small towns was also discussed.

Towards the end of the meeting, there was a call for further input and the need to finalize a draft report for a grant by the end of June. The importance of working with the town administrator to submit the report was emphasized, as well as the upcoming steps to close out the grant process.