The committee’s discussion centered on the site’s potential, weighing its suitability against other considered locales. The selection of Simon’s Way was agreed upon with an amendment, which was not detailed in the summary. The committee emphasized the importance of communicating the process and next steps to the select board, signaling their readiness to take the project into the subsequent stages of planning and approval.

Following the site recommendation, the committee dove into the details of their presentation to the select board and the community. The presentation included slides on capacity constraints, site images, and a visit to Randal, which were reviewed and updated based on feedback. The committee aimed to present accurate numbers and a persuasive narrative to justify their site choice, including the necessary operator budget for the Senior Community Center. The importance of a clear and compelling final presentation was underscored as it would be the last opportunity to communicate their recommendations effectively.

The financial aspects of the project were also a topic of discussion. The committee debated the merits of including detailed budget allocations and expenses, specifically regarding the seniors’ portion of salaries. The inclusion of financial details in the presentation was contentious, with members expressing differing views on whether it was appropriate to address specific funding matters at this stage. Furthermore, the results of a survey on the community’s willingness to fund the Senior Community Center were considered, highlighting the need for a transparent presentation of the project’s management and costs to garner community support.

While some members suggested adding multiple courts aligning to the back of Burbank, others questioned the necessity of showing more options. The committee contemplated moving the project behind the ice arena. A member recommended simplifying a particular slide that struggled to convey its intended message, advocating for a more straightforward and readable content.

The committee discussed the importance of consolidating recommendations into a comprehensive slide. This included the need for a new center, preferred building features, and the rationale behind ranking Simon’s Way as the top site. There was a call for formal input from the Council on Aging, as they had not formally voted on their site preference.

Amidst these discussions, the committee contemplated whether to release the presentation to the public before the select board meeting, weighing the potential impact on the board’s decision-making process. The committee also planned to schedule a subsequent meeting after presenting to the select board to address any emerging questions or concerns.