A primary focus was the deteriorating condition of Lift Station 3, which has faced ongoing issues with its pump. The city manager presented a cost-effective solution to repair the pump and replace the control panel for approximately $2,500, lower than the initial estimate of over $20,000 for a complete replacement. The council unanimously approved this repair, confirming that the necessary funds would be allocated from the repair and maintenance budget.

Additionally, the council approved the purchase of new water meters and registers to ensure compatibility with updated water system software, a measure aimed at preventing future replacements and aligning with the city’s technological advancements.

Further discussions included a bulk order for water and sewer supplies costing $22,759. The council explored the potential benefits of entering into an indefinite duration, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract to streamline future supply purchases. This approach would allow the city to secure a vendor for materials needed throughout the year, thus providing budget certainty for the Public Works team. The council emphasized the importance of having reliable suppliers and establishing long-term relationships to avoid frequent bidding processes.

Attention then turned to the airport, where a recent lightning strike had damaged the QT pod essential for fuel operations. The city manager reported that the entire pod needed replacement and that the insurance company would reimburse up to 70% of the expenses incurred. The council approved the purchase of an M4000 airport self-service fuel terminal for $23,900, with a motion passing unanimously.

The council also discussed a disaster recovery program that would expedite reimbursement of funds after a declared disaster through FEMA. This program, which had been under consideration for a year, received approval to enhance the city’s preparedness and financial resilience in the face of emergencies. Christy Seagler, the liaison for emergency management, was noted as the primary contact for this program.

Another topic was the debate over the recruitment process for a new director position, with Councilwoman Amy Heavilin absent during this discussion. The council considered tabling the item until all members, including Heavilin, could participate. The conversation revealed concerns about the lack of local government experience among applicants and the need for a clearer evaluation matrix to separate essential qualifications from other experience. Public comments echoed the importance of setting high standards for the qualifications of candidates, particularly for the finance director position, with a suggestion to require CPA credentials to elevate the caliber of applicants.

The council also tackled a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) related to the demolition of a structure at the corner of College and Circle, built in 1967. The existing structure was deemed not to contribute to the historic district, leading to a discussion on the necessity of council oversight in such decisions to avoid public backlash. The conversation highlighted the need for clearer guidelines and potential establishment of a design review board to evaluate properties’ historical significance and streamline the decision-making process.

A proposal from Take Five Oil Change for special approval to construct a service station within a C1 District was approved, with conditions imposed for stormwater management to protect adjacent wetlands. The council addressed broader concerns about the proliferation of similar businesses and the strategic plan for enhancing the community’s quality, focusing on attracting higher-paying jobs and diverse industries.

One of notable discussions centered around implementing a smoke-free policy in city parks. The proposal, initiated by the Tree and Beautification Board, garnered divided opinions. Some council members and attendees emphasized the importance of public education and community cooperation over punitive measures. Dr. Carolyn Zona from the Walton County Prevention Coalition advocated for the ordinance, referencing successful implementations in other Florida municipalities and highlighting its public health benefits. Concerns were raised about enforcement, potential pushback from smokers, and the aesthetic impact of signage in parks.