One of the most notable discussions during the meeting was about the town’s long-term financial obligations, specifically focusing on pensions and Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB). It was noted that the town’s pension liability had increased to $9.3 million, with the total pension obligation reported at $32.7 million as of December 31, 2022. The town had also established a trust for OPEB years ago, with contributions now totaling $3.5 million, representing 13% of the town’s liability—a favorable percentage compared to other communities. The treasurer had successfully moved funds into higher-yielding investments, and continuous evaluations of cash handling and departmental controls were encouraged to monitor revenue trends and identify potential red flags.

Another topic was the proposal for an adult-use retail cannabis dispensary by Salty Breeze Inc. on State Road. The applicant emphasized the business’s local connections. The business model aims to provide a variety of cannabis products, potentially attracting customers from neighboring towns like Fall River and New Bedford, thereby boosting local tax revenues.

The proposed dispensary would operate from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., aligning its business with the community’s culture by incorporating a nautical theme. The Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission’s regulatory framework was discussed, noting the introduction of a model agreement to standardize terms across municipalities and address past compliance issues. The proposal included a comprehensive packet detailing operational procedures and business plans, submitted for the Select Board’s review.

The board also discussed the financial implications of the cannabis business, including a 3% revenue impact fee that could provide Westport with a total positive financial impact of 6% of gross sales, combining both sales tax and community impact tax. The applicant emphasized a commitment to local hiring, community engagement through toy drives, and volunteering at local events. A draft of the host community agreement was sent to the Town Council for legal review, and no vote will occur until the legal feedback is received.

The meeting also covered the acquisition of easements for sewer purposes at two properties located on State Road and State Road, which led to debate. One board member expressed strong objection to the takings, citing concerns about appropriateness without clear project funding. Despite this, both motions concerning the easements passed with four members in favor and one opposed. The first motion awarded $44,500 in damages to the owner of 35 State Road, while the second awarded $9,700 for the property on State Road.

Additionally, the meeting included updates on various town projects. A request to transition the principal clerk position in the building department from part-time to full-time was unanimously approved, noting the clerk’s effectiveness and the upcoming online permitting project. Contracts for inspectional services and construction for the Route 6 and Maom Mer Loop waterline project were also approved, with the selected companies having favorable reputations and experience.

Another discussion focused on the Council on Aging and its increasing demand for services. Over 300 families utilized tax services during the busy season, and there were requests for more robust programming, such as pickleball. Transportation options for seniors were highlighted as a pressing need, with suggestions to relocate the Council to the old high school for better accessibility. The topic of privatization was raised, but concerns about losing state funding and grants made this option less feasible.

The board also addressed a proposal to improve parking at Hicks Bridge Landing, particularly for disabled individuals and permit holders. The representative from the Landing Commission discussed the need for safer parking and permit regulations. The board expressed a desire to ensure proper maintenance and utilization of landing areas, with an emphasis on historical preservation and community engagement.

Lastly, the meeting touched on the potential redevelopment of the old high school building. The board discussed various options, including demolishing the structure, limited municipal use, or full renovation. The financial implications of each option were considered, and the need for a thorough analysis was emphasized. The engagement of a project manager to facilitate this evaluation was discussed, with a consensus to proceed with finalizing the Request for Proposals (RFP) to avoid delays.