The ordinance proposes changes to existing regulations regarding solar panel installations, with the primary goal of making the process more accessible and less burdensome for residents. It allows for the placement of solar panels on various structures beyond dwellings, including detached garages and sheds. The permissible height of the panels above the roofline is increased from six inches to eight inches to accommodate structural needs, particularly for flat roofs.

A representative detailed that this ordinance aligns with the Princeton master plan, which promotes sustainability, resilience, and carbon neutrality. The master plan’s utility element encourages renewable energy and the ordinance aims to streamline the permitting process, thereby reducing the time and cost associated with seeking variances from the zoning board.

Additionally, the ordinance introduces a climate change hazard vulnerability assessment, the first of its kind in the area, mandated by the state. This assessment includes recommendations to enhance climate resiliency, such as increasing on-site renewable energy generation in both public and private developments. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) guidelines for installing solar panels in historic districts remain unchanged, but the ordinance encourages alternative locations like newer garages to preserve historical integrity.

During the discussion, a board member sought clarification on the definitions of “dwelling” and “structure,” receiving the explanation that a dwelling is specifically a living space while structures include other permissible constructions like garages and sheds. The ordinance applies to all residential districts except four zoning districts within the borough, focusing on one and two-family homes.

Another board member highlighted the complexities of including ground-mounted solar panels in this version of the ordinance, indicating that while considered, the vetting restrictions made it more challenging. Ground-mounted panels will be reviewed as potential accessory uses in future amendments. An environmental commission representative expressed strong support for the ordinance, emphasizing the importance of easing the process for solar installations.

Following a thorough discussion, the board moved to formally endorse the ordinance, finding it fully consistent with the master plan, and the motion received unanimous support.

In other notable business, the Board discussed the Wasco subdivision case on Stockton Street, which was postponed to October 17 due to additional variances identified. This will depend on the case being reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission first.

The meeting also included the approval of several resolutions and minutes. The board approved the minutes from November 30, 2023, and February 1, 2024, after resolving eligibility discussions. A resolution for a modification for the 10 Acre Foundation on Great Road passed unanimously, while a minor subdivision with variances on Jefferson Road was tabled for a future meeting. A minor site plan with a variance for Anthony Velli on Witherspoon Street was approved with a correction regarding the solar readiness of a parking area canopy.

Subcommittee reports were presented, including the landscape subcommittee’s resolution of tree planting issues on Tune Road and the site plan subcommittee’s review of a minor site plan application for Nassau Street. The latter involved paving a grassy area and committing to stormwater management compliance.

The board had initially anticipated a capital review regarding improvements to Princeton Public Schools, including Community Park Elementary, Littlebrook Elementary, and Princeton Middle School. However, this review was postponed due to the schools not submitting an updated long-range facility plan in a timely manner. The board emphasized the need for ongoing collaboration with the schools to facilitate a review once the necessary documents are received.