The most newsworthy topic of the meeting was the proposal to subdivide an 8,548-square-foot lot into two separate lots. Represented by a designer from Waitaki Design Collaborative, the applicant’s intention to build a new structure on one of the subdivided lots led to considerable discussion. The proposal included two residential units with three bedrooms each, open living concepts, and provisions for four parking spaces at the rear, requiring the removal of an existing retaining wall. Concerns from nearby residents about traffic impact, building height, and structural challenges due to the small lot size were prominent. One resident from 118 Glendower articulated worries about drainage and green space, emphasizing the potential structural issues posed by close foundation distances.

The applicant addressed some concerns by confirming that the proposed curb cut would improve parking at the rear, potentially alleviating traffic issues. They acknowledged the preliminary design stage. Despite these assurances, concerns about the project’s impact on local traffic and structural integrity remained.

Another topic was the proposal to replace a billboard on Canal Street with a smaller, static sign affixed to the side of the building. The existing rooftop billboard, visible from a nearby residential building, was to be removed to reduce visual impact. This proposal received support from the Downtown Business Association and the West End Civic Association. However, the city’s Planning Department maintained a policy stance against new billboards, regardless of the proposed improvements. The potential implications of denying the proposal, which would leave the existing billboard in place, were discussed. The applicant highlighted the community support for the new sign, emphasizing the aesthetic improvements and reduced visual intrusion.

In a separate case, the board reviewed a proposal to add live entertainment at a previously known establishment, now operating as Leyla’s. The request included provisions for acoustic music and a DJ, with noise mitigation measures such as closing windows by 9 PM during live performances. The board noted that the community process had been completed, and while there were noise concerns, the local civic association did not take a position on the application. The motion to approve the live entertainment license was carried without significant opposition.

The board also considered a series of cases involving residential developments. One proposal involved the removal of a garage and the construction of a new building on the same site, which raised concerns about the project’s budget adequacy and emergency services access. Despite letters of support, community members voiced worries about neighborhood access and the potential strain on emergency services.

Another development on Geary Street featured a revised parking configuration based on Boston Transportation Department recommendations.

A significant case involved the conversion of a building into seven units from a previously approved six units. This proposal faced public protest, but the applicant agreed to a rental cap of 80 percent of the area median income as a condition of approval. However, inconsistencies in the floor plans led to a deferral recommendation.

The board also addressed a proposal for groundwater recharge systems on Newbury Street, which confirmed compliance with city requirements and received no objections. Another case involved a roof deck addition to a four-story single-family structure on Adams Street, facing scrutiny due to height violations.